Professional Documents
Culture Documents
24
Evidence of Need
Aging facilities that are over 50 years old Passenger processing characteristics are less efficient than those of the newer North and South Terminal, and the maintenance and operating costs of the Central Terminal facilities will continue to increase because of their age. Pier configuration of Concourses E, F, and G do not provide the adequate separations needed to provide the efficient and unimpeded access between the airfield and the aircraft gates for these concourses.
Pier configuration of Concourses E, F, and G also lack the adequate apron depth on many gates needed to accommodate newer generation aircraft (e.g. B737-700/800/900, B747-800, B787, A350, and A380).
25
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The gates depicted on Concourse F represents a smaller fleet mix resulting in a higher number of gates. A larger fleet mix was used in the study for comparison purposes.
SOURCES: MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, MARCH 2010 (PARKING PLAN); MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, MARCH 2010 (2010 AERIAL); RICONDO & ASSOCIATES , INC., APRIL 2010.
26
Why now?
MIA Passenger Activity Projections
SOURCE: STRATEGIC AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING STUDY FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND SYSTEMS OF AIRPORTS, MARCH 2010.
27
Increase gate capacity (measured in the context of passenger volumes) and flexibility for accommodating a mix of domestic and international activity. Maximize the potential for post-security, non-aviation revenue-generating opportunities.
Enhance the customer experience within the Central Terminal by providing spacious and open areas; a diverse mix of retail and food offerings within a short walking distance; and ease of connectivity to the North and South Terminals, the Miami Intermodal Center Station, and other landside facilities. Provide an efficient and spacious FIS Facility.
28
29
Existing Conditions
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
30
Alternative 1
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
31
Alternative 2
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
32
Alternative 3A
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
33
Alternative 3B
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
34
Alternative 3C
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
35
Alternative 4
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, OCTOBER 2008; RICONDO AND ASSOCIATES, OCTOBER 2008.
36
37
Representative Plan
New Midfield Concourses bounded by a dual taxilane system to the North and East
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010; RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC., JUNE 2010.
38
Concept Characteristics
B737-800
B787-8
A350-800
A380-800
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010; RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC., JUNE 2010.
39
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010
40
41
Vertical development opportunities for commercial and retail development unlike that seen at any other U.S. airport
42
Vertical clearances similar to what has been created in the South Terminal would be adopted for the Central Terminal
43
Clear line of sight and easy access between the commercial/retail levels and the passenger processing levels are envisions for this modernization concept
44
Midfield Airside Concourse as viewed from the intersection of Runway 12-30 and Runway 9-27
45
46
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
47
Phase 1A
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
48
Phase 1B
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
49
Phase 2
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
50
Phase 3
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
51
Phase 4
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
52
Phase 5
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
53
Phase 6
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
54
Phase 7
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
55
Phase 8
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
56
Phase 9
SOURCES : MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT, JUNE 2010; RODRIGUEZ AND QUIROGA ARCHITECTS CHARTERED, JUNE 2010.
57
Next Steps
Undertake preliminary programming for the representative concept Prepare an implementation sequencing scheme for the program that balances operational needs with construction phasing efficiencies Establish the affordable program budget
Scale the program, or phase the program to meet the budget yet provide the desired benefits and achieve the established goals for the modernization of the Central Terminal
58
THE END
59