Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction: Detonations
Reaction processes Deflagration: Subsonic. Detonation: Supersonic. Coupled shock and following reaction.
Density x
Introduction: Detonations
Detonation applications
Solid
explosives Dust powder combustion in air Safety and prevention Astrophysical phenomenon
Detonation Propagation
Steady Structure: ZND profile
Density
Temperature
tr
: Reaction time
ti
: Induction time
Instability in Detonations
Detonation are unstable, which has lead to the
2D cellular structures
[Austin, The role of instability in gaseous detonation]
[Ng et al, Nonlinear dynamics and chaos analysis of 1D pulsating detonations 2005]
1D Pulsating Instability
It is an oscillation in detonation
strength
Bifurcation behaviour
Studied numerically with the 1D
reactive Euler equations Admit universal dynamics [Sharpe, Ng et al., Henrick et al.]
Summary
1D Pulsating detonation instability
governing mechanism
equations
The physics are more transparent Similar to Burgers equation for wave propagation
Eulers equation with reaction 2-step induction-reaction model [ Leung et al., Short and Sharpe ]
Present Study
Use Ficketts model with 2-step reaction model Determine the governing mechanism behind
pulsating instability
p + =0 t x 1 2 p = + Q 2
1 + = Q r 2 x t x
Characteristics Description
Characteristic can be used to describe the wave motion
dp 1 dx = rQ, along = dt 2 dt
d dx = r , along =0 dt dt
Reaction Model
2-step Induction-Reaction model An induction delay period begins before the exothermicity
i = ri = K i e t
1 2D CJ
r v = rr = K r (1 r ) , t
Numerical model
Exact Riemann solver with fractional step method Programming framework: C++ Parameters: Q=5, Ki=1, Kr=2, v=0.5
Numerical Simulation
We wanted to examine the instability behaviour Initial conditions: 1D channel of unreacted gas Initial steady ZND detonation profile
Shock Front
Reaction Zone
Induction Zone
Numerical Simulation
i = ri = K i e t
1 2D CJ
mechanism
Results
A steady solution was present Oscillatory solution occurred for >5.7 We tracked the amplitude of the shock front
= 4.5
= 6.8
5.7
6.9
7.7
8.72
Period 22 : 7.7 < 7.9 Period 20 (single period): 5.7 < 6.9 Stable Solution: < 5.7 Period 21 (double period): 6.9 < 7.7
Instability Mechanism
End of Reaction Zone End of Induction Zone Shock Front
Instability Mechanism
Stable Solution
t x
Acceleration
Deceleration
Wave Characteristic:
dp dx = rQ, along = dt dt
Conclusion
Ficketts model did admit stable and oscillatory solutions,
and followed the Feigenbaum route to chaos via period doubling bifurcations
We were able to get a clearer picture of the instability
mechanisms by analysing the characteristics in this simpler analogue, in which the dynamics of the acceleration and deceleration feedback were much more transparent [Radulescu & Tang (2011)]
While we did qualitatively recreate the bifurcation
diagram, the mechanisms behind the bifurcations still requires further study
Acknowledgements
SME4SME