Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
SIMI Fictions Tehelka

SIMI Fictions Tehelka

Ratings: (0)|Views: 60|Likes:
Published by MuhammedAfzalP

More info:

Published by: MuhammedAfzalP on Nov 18, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/30/2013

pdf

text

original

 
    S    A    T    U    R    D    A    Y ,    1    6    A    U    G    U    S    T    2    0    0    8
    |    V    O    L .    5 ,    I    S    S    U    E    3    2 ,    N    E    W     D    E    L    H    I
FREE
FAIR
FEARLESS
RS
15
   w   w   w .   t   e    h   e    l    k   a .   c   o   m 
    |
   w   w   w .   t   e    h   e    l    k   a    h    i   n    d    i .   c   o   m
p20
RAHUL BAJAJ
‘THE WORLD RECOGNISESINDIA NOT FOR ITS CULTUREBUT FOR ITS GROWTH’
MY BROTHER, OUR TOWN
SUDHIR MISHRA TALKSABOUT HIS CHILDHOODFRIEND DR. BINAYAK SEN
LITERARY APARTHEID
Richard Crasta hits out atthe West and India
p48p56
INVESTIGATIONS REVEAL THE INDIAN STATE ISWALKING DOWN A DANGEROUS AND UNJUST PATHIN ITS ATTEMPT TO COMBAT TERROR
p54
EXPOSÉ
 AN
INDIAN 
MARXIST:
EXAMINING THE EARTHY LEGACY OF HARKISHAN SINGH SURJEET
p10
 
03
16 AUGUST 2008
TEHELKA
What do you mean when you say you have “documentaryproof” against Amar Singh in the cash for vote scam?
Tis crime of bribery comprised three stages. Te first was theoffer to
MP
s
, the second was their meeting with Amar Singh,and the third is the actual payment of money through his assis-tant Sanjeev Saxena. All three stages are on the videocassette.Additionally, the cameraman and reporter of the channel thatrecorded it are corroborative witnesses. Te
MP
s
themselves area direct witness. And the fact of Sanjeev Saxena being AmarSingh’s man can be corroboratedfrom the video with independent evi-dence. He speaks to Amar Singh atleast six times. His phone shows callsmade to Amar Singh’s residence dur-ing that period. Te car in which hecame is registered in the name of Amar Singh’s family mem-bers. And we have given huge proof. In fact, only one proof it-self is enough. Now that it is admitted that Sanjeev Saxenacame with the bribe money, who is he and whose man is he?We have given voluminous evidence including documentary evidence in his own handwriting showing that his place of work was 27, Lodhi Estate and he is Amar Singh’s man.
How would you refute allegations from former colleague,Uma Bharti who has accused you, a
BJP
general secretary, aparty chief minister and some
MP
s
of having a hand in plan-ning the entire cash for vote episode?
She doesn’t deserve a reply.
Why not?
Her politics have sunk so low that she can only tout fabrica-tions at the behest of Amar Singh. I don’t think she deserves aserious comment.
Are you trying to cover up because there is disarray in yourown house? Eight of your
MP
s
cross-voted during the trustvote in the Lok Sabha.
Why is it a cover up? I think your conscience should prick onthe question of corruption. Tis is the kind of investigationthat 
EHELKA
should have been carrying out rather than us.We are giving evidence of the fact — even if we give it in thecase of three
MP
s
— that money was used to influence the vote.
Was it then a planned strategyby the
BJP
to display the bundlesof cash in the Parliament on theday of the trust vote?
Well, once you have got evidenceto prove that bribe was given, it isnecessary to arouse the national consciousness.
There was a time when
BJP
questioned sting operations.Doesn’t the current one by your party fall in the realm of entrapment?
I don’t think we have ever questioned the very idea of stingoperations. Te fact is that one has to be careful about the ve-racity of the facts, that’s all.
When your former party president Bangaru Laxman wasstung, the party did question the sting operation.
We had made him resign the very night that the stingtook place.
But the
BJP
did question it…
You see, there was a difference regarding the interpretation of evidence in some cases, but the concept of sting operationswas never questioned.
The BJP hit back when it was stung butparty General Secretary
Arun Jaitley
tells
SHOBHITANAITHANI
that stingoperations are kosher
‘UMA BHARTIIS LYING AT AMAR SINGHSBEHEST’
‘Your conscience should prick onthe question of corruption. Tehelkashould have done it, not us’
incoldblood
    S    H    A    I    L    E    N    D    R    A    P    A    N    D    E    Y

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->