Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Adap Watch 11.19.12

Adap Watch 11.19.12

Ratings: (0)|Views: 189 |Likes:
Published by housingworks

More info:

Published by: housingworks on Nov 27, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/21/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
ADAPs with Active Waiting Lists(87 individuals in 5 states*, as of November 15, 2012)StateNumber of Individualson ADAP Waiting ListPercent of the TotalADAP Waiting ListIncrease/Decreasefrom PreviousReporting PeriodDate WaitingList BeganFlorida
0 0% -58 June 2010
Georgia
0 0% 0 July 2010
Idaho
8 9% 8 October 2012
Louisiana**
58 67% 28 June 2010
South Dakota
21 24% 5 August 2012
*As a result of FY2012 ADAP emergency funding, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska,North Carolina, and Virginia were able to reduce the overall number of individuals on their waiting lists.**Louisiana has a capped enrollment on their program. This number represents their current unmet need.
ADAPs with Capped Enrollment (as of November 15, 2012)State Enrollment CapUtah
450 direct medication clients,100 insurance clients
Wyoming
135
ADAPs with Other Cost-containment Strategies: Financial Eligibility(instituted since September 2009, as of September 26, 2012)
Since September 2009,
six ADAPs
previously lowered their financial eligibility as part of their cost-containment plans. Illinois, North Dakota, Ohio and South Carolina lowered their eligibility level to 300% FPL. Utah lowered its eligibility level to 250% FPL. Arkansas lowered its eligibility level to 200% FPL.Previously, income eligibility for the states noted above was 400% FPL or higher. As a result of thesemeasures, a total of 445 individuals in three states (Arkansas - 99, Ohio - 257, and Utah
89) weredisenrolled. Illinois, North Dakota, and South Carolina grandfathered clients that were previouslyeligible based on their income level into their programs. No other ADAPs currently report anticipatingfurther changes to their financial eligibility.
 
November 19, 2012

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->