Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2011_03_25 - Letter Boxer - On the Immorality of Drone Strikes

2011_03_25 - Letter Boxer - On the Immorality of Drone Strikes

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1 |Likes:
Published by John Uebersax
Open Letter to Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) on the immorality of US drone stikes
Open Letter to Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) on the immorality of US drone stikes

More info:

Published by: John Uebersax on Feb 12, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





John S. Uebersax PhD
83 Laguna Place
(805) 712-3145
Paso Robles, California 93446 
March 25, 2011The Honorable Barbara BoxerUnited States Senate112 Hart Senate Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20510-0505
Subject: On the Immorality of Drone Missile Strikes in Pakistan
Dear Senator Boxer:Best greetings. Thank you again for your having recently introduced legislation to effect the rapid removal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. While appreciative of this step, I amnonetheless moved to write to request a cessation of drone missile strikes in Pakistan; andthat the Senate conduct hearings on these covert operations.Your House colleagues last year held hearings on the legal aspects of the strikes. Despitecertain points of disagreement, the witnesses unanimously recommended Congress toexercise considerably more oversight in the matter.Those hearings, however, did not go far enough. More fundamental than the question of conformity to international law is that of morality: as Seneca put it, "Propriety forbidswhat the law allows."I believe that the immorality of these strikes ought to be apparent to every Americanofficial and citizen. Some of the more salient problems are these:1.
. Assassination is universally regarded as odious and morally repugnant.Only in the case of dire necessity is it deemed acceptable -- and only then with great reluctance, and even remorse. One or two strikes, if truly necessary to neutralize topterrorists, might be considered necessary. But ten strikes should raise an alarm; and 200strikes, the current approximate number, show that all moral restraint has beenabandoned.2.
. The mechanized, inhumane nature of these killings makes them evenworse. With conventional war, there is at least a sense of honor, courage, and mutualrespect among combatants. But with drones the victims are slaughtered like animals, withno chance to flee, to surrender, or to fight back 
thereby at least gaining an honorabledeath. Nothing in the strikes acknowledges the humanity of those slain.3.
. These attacks are mainly aimed at Taliban militants, not terrorists.Thus the principle of proportionality, a basic tenet of Just War doctrine, is violated. TheTaliban never attacked the United States; in their minds, they are defending theirhomeland. There is no justification to resort to such extreme, violent, and inhumanemethods against them.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->