You are on page 1of 23

PHILIPS Vs

MATSHUSHITA
STRATEGIC COMPETENCE

PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 1/22
GROUP - 2
 RENU
 REKHA
 KARAN
 ADITYA
 ASHOK
 MANISH

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 2/22
PHILIPS MATSUSHITA

Strategy Strategy
National responsiveness Global scale efficiency
Technology-driven innovation Market-driven rapid innovation

Entrepreneurial NOs Innovative PDs


Central research and funding Linkages in the value chain

Core Incompetencies Core Incompetencies


Slow technology to market Overseas subs not innovative
Poor global strategy

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 3/22
Philips

Value Management

Research Development Manufacturing Marketing Service, etc.

Centralized Decentralized (NOs)


Basic scientific Adapt, manufacture, market, and service products within national markets
innovation, develop
new products

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 4/22
Matsushita

Value Management

Research Development Manufacturing Marketing Service, etc.

Centralized Centralized (PDs) Decentralized (NOs)


Applied product and Develop and manufacture products Market and service products within
process innovation national markets

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 5/22
PHILIPS MATSUSHITA
 Gerard Philips and  Konosuke
Anton Matsushita
 Van Riemsdijk and  Yamashita’s
Rodenburg  Tanii’s
 Wisse Dekker  Yoichi Morishita’s
 Van der Klugt  Kunio Nakamura’s
 Timmer
 Boonstra
 Kleisterlee

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 6/22
Gerard Philips and Anton

 Development of tungsten metal


filament bulb
 Transfer of Assets
 Research Laboratories shifted to
England
 Top Management moved to USA

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 7/22
Van Riemsdijk and
Rodenburg
(1970)
 Decentralization of Authority between
Product Division and National
Organization
 Closed the inefficient Local Plants and
convert best into International
Production Center

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 8/22
Wisse Dekker
(1982)

 Focused on core operation


 Cost reduction in operation
 Overseas Technology Sharing
Agreement

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 9/22
Van der Klugt
(1987)
 Matsushita
overtook Philips Net Income

6000
5000
Net income (in $ Millions)

4000
3000
2000 Philips
1000 Matsushita

0
-1000 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

-2000
-3000
Year

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 10/22
Van der Klugt
(1987)
 Matsushita overtook Philips
 Divided business in core and non-
core
 Divesting Business

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 11/22
Timmer
(1990)
 Stick approach
 Sold the non profitable business
 Ignored consumer demand

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 12/22
Boonstra (1996)

 Shifted production to low-wage


countries
 Achieved 24% returns on net assets

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 13/22
Kleisterlee (2001)
 Outsourced production
 Made a loss after 1996

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 14/22
Conclusion
 Philips had a complex manufacturing
and marketing origanization which
was not cost effective.

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 15/22
MATSHUSHITA

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 16/22
Konosuke Matsushita

 Started company with Yen 100 and


start production of double-ended
stock
 Battery Power lamps, electronic irons
and radios
 250 year Plan divided into 25 year
section plan
 Post-war boom with new products
24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 17/22
CONT.
 Divisional Structure
 Business Expansion
 Global Leadership
 Monitoring and Operation Controls
 Headquarter and subsidiaries
relationship

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 18/22
Yamashita’s
 Local Market Operation
 More product alternatives were made
available in overseas

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 19/22
Tanii’s
 Brought all subsidiaries under METC
 Acquisition of MCA
 Economy burst
 Less profit as compare to 1991

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 20/22
Yoichi Morishita’s
 Decentralization of authority
 Shifted production to Asian Country
 Began investing in R&D Partnership

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 21/22
Kunio Nakamura’s
 Change the company’s vision.
 Focus on customer need.

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 22/22
Bibliography
 online.glos.ac.uk
 HBS Case Study

24/12/07 PGDBM-1
PICT-SITM 23/22

You might also like