Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CALCULUS
( , )
1670 1740
! ANALYSIS
1820 smera
Susthmatik melth: Pwc orzetai o arijmc? Aximata pou
jemelinoun to snolo twn pragmatikn arijmn
ANALUSH
1648-1727
1646-1716
Orismc sunqeiac...
Dhmiourga
I (= ) ,
I (= ),
I lim f (x), , . . .
AUTOSUNEPOUS GLWSSAS
xa
I , , ...
BIBLIOGRAFIA
- .. , LEADER BOOKS, 2003
, M. Spivak , . . ,
(Lseic x + n = 0)
, . , .
, THOMAS-FINLEY, . .
N = {1, 2, 3, . . .}
(Indo)
Z = {0, 1, 2, . . .}
Arqaithta
(Lseic qx p = 0)
Q = {p/q, p Z, q N}
Diafneiec: http://users.auth.gr/daskalo
Anagnnhsh
Noi Qrnoi
x2 + x + = 0
= 2 4
Lseic
Aximata
Peano
Prosjetik
Omda
Pukn
pedo (field) /
sma
Tomc
Dedekind
Pukn pedo
me ditaxh
<<suneqc >>
NZQR
Fusiko arijmo
SUSTHMA
AXIWMATA
i) 1 N
ii) n N
iii) n N
iv) n = m
Arq Epagwgc
Peano
Peano
n+1N
sunepgetai ti
n+1>1
h prtash
P (n)
P (n + 1) alhjeei
nN
n+1=m+1
BASIKES TAUTOTHTES
Tpoc Newton
0! = 1
n! = n (n 1)!
n
Sundiasmc n pragmtwn an k
k =
paragontik/factorial
Gewmetrik Ajroisma
1 + t + t2 + + tn =
n
P
k=0
tk =
1tn+1
1t
Tpoc Newton
n
P
n
n1
n1
=
+
(a + b)n =
k
k1
k
k=0
Tpoi <<Gauss>>
1 + 2 + 3 + + n =
n
k
n(n+1)
2
n (n + 1) (2n + 1)
6
Tpoc <<Bernoulli>>
1 + 2 2 + 3 2 + + n2 =
x 1
(1 + x)n 1 + nx
n
0
ak bnk
= 1,
n
1
= n,
n! = 1 2 3 (n 1) n
n!
k! (n k)!
n
2
n(n 1) 2 n2
(a + b)n =bn + nabn1 +
a b
+ +
2
n m nm
+
a b
+ + nan1 b + an
m
n
P
n
n1
n1
n k nk
=
+
(a + b)n =
a b
k
k
k1
k
k=0
Apdeixh <<di th
c ec topon apagwghc>>/ proof by contradiction
Gia na apodexoume thn sunepagwg twn protsewn P Q arke na
apodexoume ti h upjesh { P alhjc kai Q analhjc } sunepgetai
mia antfash (<<topon>>)
Paradegmata
Z Z 3 (, ) + Z
{ An n N kai n > 2 } n 1 N
{ Metax twn fusikn arijmn n kai n + 1 den uprqei lloc fusikc
arijmc} ! {To snolo N den enai pukn}
A1
A2
A3
A4
+ =+
+0=
+ () = 0
+ ( + ) = ( + ) +
:
Q ( ), R ( ), C ( ),
Pedo/Sma -
Field
(F, +)
A1
A2
A3
A4
+ =+
+0=
+ () = 0
+ ( + ) = ( + ) +
(F\{0}, )
A5
A6
A7
A8
=
1=
(1 ) = 1
( ) = ( )
- distributivity
A9
( + ) = ( ) + ( )
F n
F, 6= 0;
n = 1
Q / 0, Z
Q qx + p = 0, p q
Z
o
nm
: m Z, n N
Q=
n
2 6 Q ( )
a + b 2 : a b Q
( a2 2b2 6= 0) 0 ( )
0
+ 2 + 0 + 20 = ( + 0 ) + 2 (
+ )0
0
0
0
0
+ 2 + 2 = ( + 2 ) + 2 ( + 0 )
1
2
+ 2
= 2
2
2 2
2 2
n
a+b 2 =1
n=0
To snolo Z2 0, 1 enai pedo. Me qarakthristik 1.
0+0=0
00=0
0+1=1+0=1 01=10=0
1+1=0
11=1
a 6= 0 a = a
1
a =1
Pardeigma Z5 = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
0+0=0
00=0
0+1=1+0=1 01=10=0
1+1=2
11=1
0+2=2+0=2 02=20=0
1+2=2+1=0 12=21=2
2+2=1
22=1
2
a 6= 0 a = 1
1
1 = 2, 2 = 1, 2 = 2
2+22
1=2
0
0
1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
0
2
2
3
4
0
1
3
3
4
0
1
2
0
1
2
3
4
4
4
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
3
4
2
0
2
4
1
3
3
0
3
1
4
2
4
0
4
3
2
1
(1) 3 = 2 = 3
4
Orismc:
To snolo X enai olik diatetagmno an mia sqsh ditaxhc
A10 x y : X x y y x
A11 x
x x autopajc idithta
A12 x y kai y x
x = y (anti)summetrik idithta
A13 x y kai y z;
x z metabatik idithta
Paradegmata:
2 =3 =4 =1
Orismc:
To pedo F, pou enai olik diatetagmno onomzetai
diatetagmno pedo an
A14 x y
x+z y+z
A15 0 x kai 0 y
Paradegmata:
0xy
AXIWMATA R
AXIWMATIKH JEMELIWSH R
(A1 )
(A2 )
(A3 )
(A4 )
+ =+
+0=
+ () = 0
+ ( + ) = ( + ) +
abelian idit.
prosetairist.
(A5 )
(A6 )
(A7 )
(A8 )
=
1=
(1 ) = 1
( ) = ( )
abelian idit.
Axwma I
(A9 )
( + ) = ( ) + ( )
epimeristikt.
(A10 )
(A11 )
(A12 )
(A13 )
x, y : R x y y x
x
xx
x y kai y x;
x=y
x y kai y z;
xz
(A14 )
(A15 )
xy
0x
kai
oudtero
antjeto
oudtero
antjeto
prosetairist.
autopajc id.
kai
Axwma II
To R enai na olik diatetagmno pedo
antisummetrik
metabatik id.
Axwma III
x+z y+z
0y
0xy
Paratrhsh lec autc oi idithtec enai koinc kai gia to Q kai gia
to R
Infimum
Protseic
kx
m = inf A
k =
(i)
x A
m = inf A
(i)
x A
mx
mx
m=inf A
` R : x A
x ` pou ` = nw frgma
M = sup A
M = sup A
(i)
x A
(i)
x A
xM
xM
An inf A A
inf A = min A.
Genik to inf A 6 A dhl. to min A den uprqei p.q.
1
3 4 5
A = 1 + , n N = 2, , , , . . .
n
2 3 4
inf A = 1 6 A
An sup A A
sup A = max A.
Genik to sup A 6 A dhl. to max A den uprqei
1
1 2
A = 1 , n N = 0, , ,
n
2 3
p.q.
3
,...
4
sup A = 1 6 A
Orismc:
sup R