Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kairos A Publication of the Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary Community Issue #174
Personal Counseling
Parents’ Night Out
Referral for individual counseling is available to
Mark your calendar for the following dates: students and/or their families as needed. If you would like
• March 27, Hicks Community House, 6:00 to 8:30 to talk about the possibility of counseling, contact Ann
p.m. RSVP by Wednesday, March 25. Fields at afields@austinseminary.edu or by phone at 404-
• April 17, Hicks Community House, 6:00 to 8:30 4869.
p.m. RSVP by Wednesday, April 15.
Sat., May 23
CORRECTED TIMES
The Student Senate is proposing a change to the are tallied up as everyone’s vote and the results
Constitution regarding the election of student officers. show the Diane has 30 votes, Cindy 27, Billy 26,
The proposal will be presented, discussed, and consid- and Adam 17. Since no candidate has reached a
ered at an upcoming Manna. What follows is a descrip- majority something else has to happen to elect a
tion of the current situation and the proposal for change. candidate. Normally we would have a second
round of voting with new ballots. In the proposed
The idea behind changing our election system to system we move to the instant runoff.
an instant runoff vote (single transferable vote) system is 4. Adam has the lowest vote count and so his bal-
to limit the amount of time we spend on elections and to lots are redistributed based on the second prefer-
ensure that each voter’s voice is given an equal say. ence. Let’s assume that most of Adam’s support-
In previous years our election system has made ers favored Billy and to a lesser extent Diane and
for elections that last anywhere from four to eight weeks. Cindy. The new tally is Diane 33, Cindy 31, and
When you count in all the time it takes for nominations, Billy 36.
elections, and then runoff elections, our current system is 5. We still have no majority winner and so another
very time consuming. As the elections drag on, students instant runoff is held, this time Cindy’s ballots are
become less interested and candidates can become more redistributed based on the next preference. As-
frustrated. It also ties up extra time for the elections com- suming most of Cindy’s support went to Diane the
missioner, Student Senate, and candidates during the end new tally is Diane 58 and Billy 42. Diane is de-
of the spring semester. clared the winner because she now has a major-
During runoff elections voter turnout is almost, ity of the votes.
always much lower than for the original election. Voters
voices aren’t heard because they don’t participate or be- All this happened within a matter of minutes once
cause they no longer care for either candidate. the final vote was cast and each and every person’s ballot
The proposed system would allow for voters to was counted in a way they preferred. While the system
vote their preference of candidate no matter what situa- seems more difficult, it is actually a much more efficient
tion arises. The proposed election system would bring and fair way of holding an election.
the election cycle down to about 4 weeks at most. Be- While the system isn’t exactly the same when it
cause of the way the elections would be conducted, there comes to electing senators or committee representatives
would be no runoff elections (they would be built into the the guiding principles are the same. This is because we
first ballots) and candidates would be elected in a much aren’t electing a single winner but multiple winners in a
quicker amount of time. The ballots would ask the voter to single election. There is an added step in redistributing
rank the candidates in order of preference to be used in some of the votes. This system is officially called single
case no candidate is elected immediately. Because voters transferable vote instead of instant runoff voting.
rank the candidates they always have a say in the elec-
tion process and they never have to make a choice be- If you would like to learn more about the pro-
tween the “lesser of evils.” posed system or watch some really cool videos check out
Here is (hopefully) a simple breakdown of how these web resources.
the proposed voting system works. There are other expla- http://instantrunoff.com/
nations on the Internet, and there are links to them at the http://www.fairvote.org/
end of this letter. This example will use the student body http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLVAF6M-FcQ - the
president election as the example. easiest/shortest way to get acquainted with the proposed
voting system.
1. Adam, Billy, Cindy, and Diane are all nominated http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
and are running for president. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
2. Students are given (electronically using email and Yes the last two come from Wikipedia, but they are accu-
the Internet) a ballot that asks them to rank ALL rate and in depth and provide a good picture of what IRV
candidates by preference. and STV are.
3. After the election has ended the first preferences
For more information, contact Melissa Koerner, Student Body President, or Matthew Thompson, Senator.
Issue 174 www.austinseminary.typepad.com/portal/kairos.html Page 4
Submissions to Kairos: Email submissions to the editor, Paul Dubois, at Kairos@austinseminary.edu. Calendar events and room reservation
requests should be sent to Jackie McCully at jmccully@austinseminary.edu or made in person at the McCord desk. Editorial decisions are based
on urgency, availability of space, and editorial guidelines. Deadline is Wednesday at 5:00 P.M. Submissions made after deadline must be
accompanied by a dunkel.