A study by Martin Walsh of traditional authority, historical knowledge and political power in Usangu, south-west Tanzania.
Citation: Walsh, M. T. 1984. The Misinterpretation of Chiefly Power in Usangu, South-west Tanzania,. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Original Title
The Misinterpretation of Chiefly Power in Usangu, South-west Tanzania
A study by Martin Walsh of traditional authority, historical knowledge and political power in Usangu, south-west Tanzania.
Citation: Walsh, M. T. 1984. The Misinterpretation of Chiefly Power in Usangu, South-west Tanzania,. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
A study by Martin Walsh of traditional authority, historical knowledge and political power in Usangu, south-west Tanzania.
Citation: Walsh, M. T. 1984. The Misinterpretation of Chiefly Power in Usangu, South-west Tanzania,. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
‘THE MISINTERPRETATION OF CHIEFLY POWER
IN USANGU, SOUTH-WEST TANZANIA
by
Martin Timothy Walsh
Wolfson College
Cambridge
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
August 1984CONTENTS
PREFACE...
1, INTRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGE AND POWER.
2. POLITICAL HISTORY FROM WRITTEN SOURCES.
3. THE MODERN CHIEF: BETWEEN VILLAGERS AND THE STATE.......0000++67
44, RELATIONS AND CORRELATIONS OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE “97
5. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MISREADING GREETINGS, 126
6. CONCLUSIONS: MERERE IN WRITING...... estat +2158
APPENDIX: SANGU KINSHIP...
BIBLIOGRAPHY....... +2188
iLPREFACE
The argument of this thesis (that power is reproduced through its
misinterpretation) is straightforward. Its presentation is rather more
involved and in this and other respects it reflects current trends in
ethnographic writing (as reviewed by Marcus and Cushman 1982), The thesis
opens with an account of my first impressions in the field and the
received image of chiefly power which they appeared to support. The
central chapters show this to have been a misinterpretation, while the
last two argue that misinterpretation of this kind can itself result in a
(very different) form of power. Recent developments in post-structuralist
theory are drawn upon to suggest one possible account of this process, and
a final section reflects critically upon the historical outline which
forms the subject of chapter two. Argument aside, I hope at least to have
highlighted an important interpretative problem and to have made a
significant contribution to the ethnography of south-west Tanzania.
Acknowledgments
My first thanks must go to the people, the party (CCM) and the
government of Tanzania; most of all to the villagers of Utengule and
Luhanga, especially Eliuter Shinangonele, Betitha Mwakalinga, Ngwila
Simuhongole, Gaspar Makela, mtwa Alfeo Mgandilwa Merere, their families and
‘the many others who helped me during my stay.
My supervisor, Ray Abrahams, has been a constant source of
encouragement and advice, Alison Redmayne introduced me to the ethnography
of Usangu and visited me in the field. Thanks also to the following for
help of different kind
Jacques Bilodeau, William Garland, Beverley
ua