A , 9tir cAcCirm

Ex.ndota gifrs f

# of evaluations = 8
Feedback RESULTS
Accelerated and Enriched Instruction Advisory Committee
January 151 2009
Ciidethe,reSPOitse that rn (Toëflàtthis.4.!Ciiii:':..0011jlaiii'.
The meeting accomplished the outcomes:
The meeting addressed the charge of this Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
committee. Agree
1 = no comment 6 1
Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
• Reviewed action steps Agree
5 3
• Revised future meetings agendas Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
(note: action was deferred to the agenda Agree
subcommittee) 1 3 3
1 = no comment
Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
• Provided input on revision of Policy IOA Agree
5 2 1
• Provided input of Policy IOA Revision Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Overview Agree
1 = no comment 4 3
-ffective means were used to achieve outcomes. Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Agree
1 = no comment _3 2 2
The pacing was appropriate. Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Agree
2 4 2
There were opportunities for me to interact with Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
others during the meeting. Agree
5 3
I felt valued and involved. Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Agree
4 4

Tellms what you think.

What did you find most helpful about the meeting?
- Working on the policy language and voting.
- The truly thoughtful consideration given to participant requests for voting.
- A number of contentious points were discussed.
What changes/upgrades would you recommend?
- We are spending too much time on word-smithing.
- More focus on creating edits and voting on language.
- Present the voting/vetting process on the screen for review and clarification before starting. It's hard
to hear that process verbally.
That else should we consider?
• - Focus on the Policy Revision.
- I would like to add a discussion of the math curriculum and acceleration goals to our agenda. If
necessary, I could wait until the next school year.