• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 1
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
No. 09-10661-C
 _____________________ 
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
 _____________________ 
SUSAN HERBERT,
Plaintiff-Appellant 
VersusBARACK OBAMA,JOHN ROBERTS,AND THE UNITED STATES
, 
 Defendants-Appellees
On Appeal From The United States District CourtFor The Middle District Of Florida
BRIEF FOR APPELLANT
“Judicial Review Is The Myth Of Fingerprints”
Susan Herbert1100 Seagate Avenue 101 Neptune Beach, FL 32266904.705.6171
1
 
Corporate Disclosure Statement
Appellant, Susan Herbert, does not hold an interest in any corporations nor does she own anystock; she represents only herself as an absolute class of one. Not only does Susan own no stock  but Susan Herbert holds no professional licenses and no diplomas as she does not believe inthem, as paper proves nothing in a constitutional nation. This case meets and exceedsextraordinary circumstances thus some rule may not be applicable.
Table of Contents
Corporate Disclosure Statement..........................................................................................iTable Of Authorities............................................................................................................iiOral Argument.....................................................................................................................iiiJurisdictional Statement.......................................................................................................1Statement Of Issues..............................................................................................................9Facts....................................................................................................................................20Summary Of Argument.......................................................................................................60Argument............................................................................................................................62I.Judicial Review Is The Myth Of FingerprintsII.Constitutional Authority Vested In The Lone Citizen, or, Like It Or NotMarbury V Madison Is The Law Of The US And This Universe...........................76III. Forever Pro Se.......................................................................................................123Conclusion.........................................................................................................................136Certification.......................................................................................................................179Proof Of Service................................................................................................................Last2
 
Table Of Authorities
Bush V Gore, throughoutBrown V Topeka, throughoutMarbury V Madison, throughoutMonell V DSS, page 60, 89 and throughoutIn Re Susan Herbert, 07-9804 Supreme Court of the US, throughoutIn Re Thomas Jefferson, 08-6622 Supreme Court of the US, throughoutKokkonen V Guardian Life Insurance, page 6Lassiter, page 60, 89Carhart, page 80 & throughoutSchiavo De Novo, page 80 & throughoutCastlerock V Gonzales page 80 & throughout Nicholson V Scopetta, page 24Stankowsky V Kramer, page 86Ca Evidence Code, page 39See Exhibit O titled “US Case Law”.
Other
 NY, PA & FL domestic violence and child abuse law Exhibit T; Federalist 10, 23, 47, 48 and 78;the Magna Carta and the Iroquois Confederacy (Constitution).3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
SusanConstant

Who wants to author a brand new Federalist Paper? I'll be needing one entitled "Abolishing Insufferable Forms of Governemnt"...you need to address how one exercises their right of dissolution as it takes several forms. One is: You change the construct people have in their heads as it does not match actual reality. Nobody has to wait on the elected government to act. It is as I said: If you wait to dissolve insufferable forms of government what you are then waiting on is for these people to die as that is the only way they'll leave office and/or be forced to act via default as physical death is the check and balance no man can defeat - yet. WHO said the law is that you cannot write a brand new Federalist Paper if it is needed? WHO made that law? Even the founders did not suggest that.

reply04 / 28 / 2009
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...