Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
At 5:04 P.M., Tuesday, October 17, 1989, as over 62,000 fans filled Candlestick Park for the third game of
the World Series and the San Francisco Bay Area commute moved into its heaviest flow, a Richter magnitude
7.1 earthquake struck. It was an emergency planner's worst-case scenario.
The 20-second earthquake was centred about 60 miles south of San Francisco, and was felt as far away as
San Diego and western Nevada. Scientists had predicted an earthquake would hit on this section of the San
Andreas Fault and considered it one of the Bay Area's most dangerous stretches of the fault.
Among the most catastrophic seismic-induced events were the collapse of the elevated Cypress Street
section of Interstate 880 in Oakland, the collapse of a section of the roadbed of the San Francisco-Oakland
Bay Bridge, multiple building collapses in San Francisco's Marina district, and the collapse of several
structures in the town of Santa Cruz at the Pacific Garden Mall and in other areas around the epicentral
region.
It is possible that surface waves, which are a slower rolling motion and the last type of wave to arrive,
stimulated heavy motion in soft, water-saturated soils around the Bay's margin, resulting in much of the
dramatic damage in parts of San Francisco and Oakland. This was somewhat like the amplified earthquake
waves that destroyed sections of Mexico City hundreds of miles from that earthquake's epicenter.
Damage and business interruption estimates reached as high as $10 billion, with direct damage estimated at
$6.8 billion. $2 billion of that amount is for San Francisco alone and Santa Cruz officials estimated that
damage to that county will top $1 billion. Areas outside of Santa Cruz, including the towns of Watsonville,
Hollister, and Los Gatos, also suffered heavy damage. President Bush declared a disaster area for the seven
hardest-hit counties, from Monterey and San Benito in the south to Marin and Solano in the north.
Over 62 people died, a remarkably low number given the time and size of the earthquake. Most casualties
were caused by the collapse of the Cypress Street section. At least 3,700 people were reported injured and
over 12,000 were displaced. Over 18,000 homes were damaged and 963 were destroyed. Over 2,500 other
buildings were damaged and 147 were destroyed.
The October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake - October 1989
Damage to Buildings
• The Loma Prieta Earthquake and its subsequent aftershocks resulted in widespread damage to a variety
of commercial structures. A large geographical area was affected, as is typical for an earthquake of this
magnitude.
• In total, building structures experienced damage over an area of approximately 3,000 square miles.
• Although damage was widespread, it was also quite sporadic. As would be expected, areas closest to the
epicenter experienced the most concentrated damage. Farther away, heavy damage was generally limited
to buildings of very poor construction founded on soft soils that failed or amplified the earthquake
ground motions. This is similar to the effects noted in the 1985 Mexico City Earthquake.
• Earthquake effects also tended to be highly directional. Most damage occurred within a narrow band
that extends northwest to southeast, approximately paralleling the San Andreas Fault. Thus many
communities along the margins of San Francisco Bay escaped serious damage.
Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
• As has been observed in past California earthquakes, the most concentrated and severe damage to
building structures occurred in unreinforced masonry (URM) bearing-wall buildings.
• URM buildings, constructed of wood-frame roof and floor systems supported by thick unreinforced brick
walls, were commonly constructed throughout California until the 1930s, when new building regulations
taking into consideration the need to withstand earthquakes prevented further buildings of this style.
• As a result, these older URM buildings are typically found in the crowded central business districts of
older California cities.
• The remote location of the epicentre of this earthquake allowed the San Francisco Bay Area to survive
with relatively few instances of structural collapse. Except for buildings near the epicenter, most cases
of severe damage occurred in older buildings with little ability to withstand earthquakes and in areas of
extremely weak soils.
• The fact that many inadequate structures in the region experienced little damage indicates that ground
motion in most areas was not severe.
• Even so, most businesses experienced at least a week's business interruption and some capital loss. Many
businesses must relocate to new facilities until their buildings are repaired or replaced.
• In future stronger shocks or in earthquakes located closer to the major population centers, much more
extensive damage and commercial loss are likely.
• A major and encompassing effect of the Loma Prieta Earthquake is to transportation. Several major
highways, overpasses, and ground thoroughfares were damaged and rendered useless, some for only a
short time, others for as much as a few years.
Conclusion
• Little of the damage caused in this earthquake was unexpected.
• Typically, unreinforced masonry structures, older tilt-up buildings, and poorly designed wood-frame
houses in the epicenter region were heavily damaged, while damage farther away from the epicenter was
to high-risk structures on soft and saturated soils.
• The significance of this earthquake is the warning it delivered of the dangers faced by people,
governments, and businesses in seismically active areas. With such attention, it is hoped that
preparedness efforts will be similarly stimulated and will continue at a high level.
• There is the concern, however, that many building owners in the Bay Area may conclude that the survival
of their buildings in this somewhat distant, but strong earthquake certifies their structure as
earthquake safe. In many cases, nothing could be further from the truth. For example, thousands of
unreinforced masonry buildings, pre-1975 tilt-ups, and poorly engineered structures survived the
earthquake with no apparent damage. A larger quake or one that is closer to San Francisco, San Jose, or
Oakland would have produced dramatically different results.
• It is interesting to note that in October 1865, a strong earthquake struck virtually the same section of
the San Andreas Fault (in the Santa Cruz Mountains) with similar effects to the same areas. This quake
was then followed three years later, in October 1868, by one of the largest earthquakes to occur on the
Hayward Fault near Oakland. Finally, the "big one" struck in 1906 with a magnitude of 8.3 on the San
Andreas Fault, devastating Northern California and destroying much of San Francisco. It should be
understood that the recent earthquake did not lower the probability of another major earthquake or the
"big one" occurring in the next 30 years. Based on past history (1865, 1868) there is speculation that
there actually may be greater seismic activity in the future.
Despite the various problems, officials and experts are quick to point out that this earthquake could have
been far worse. Engineers continue to improve building codes, particularly in California, to incorporate
improved seismic design. However, there are still many seismically vulnerable structures that need to be
dealt with. This is particularly true outside of California.
In terms of response, years of planning and drilling enabled police and fire departments to respond quickly
and efficiently to what could have been a safety planner's ultimate nightmare--a major earthquake during
rush hour and the World Series.
The October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake - October 1989
Aerial view of collapsed sections of the Cypress Bent reinforcement bars in failed support column,
viaduct of Interstate Highway 880. Cypress viaduct.
Aerial view of large slides north of Fort Funston. House moved laterally off cement foundation.
Earthquake Probabilities for the
San Francisco Bay Area
On the basis of research conducted since the 1989
Loma Prieta earthquake, U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) and other scientists conclude that there is a
70% probability of at least one magnitude 6.7 or
greater quake, capable of causing widespread
damage, striking the San Francisco Bay region before
2030. Major quakes may occur in any part of this
rapidly growing region. This emphasizes the urgency
Structural failure of twin bridges carrying Highway 1 for all communities in the Bay region to continue
across Struve Slough, near Watsonville. preparing for earthquakes.
The October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake - October 1989
Fortunately, there is something we can do about it. By taking actions, such as those described in this
booklet, we can drastically reduce the losses and we can make the Bay Area a safer place to live.
Earthquake damage is particularly great in certain locations and in certain buildings. Most locations and most
modern buildings are relatively safe. By identifying the greatest hazards, we can set priorities for using our
limited resources most effectively to reduce them. The choice is ours.
The October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake - October 1989
• If you are driving when the earthquake strikes, move to the shoulder of the highway and away
from bridges, overpasses, power lines, and large buildings as quickly as is safe. Stay in your car
and wait for the shaking to stop.
• If you are riding BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit), the train typically will stop. Remain calm and
follow instructions from BART staff members who have been trained to handle earthquake
emergencies.
The October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake - October 1989