Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. Grammar , spelling , punctuation , coherence , covering . In my opinion, attending a live performance , for example, a play, concert or sporting event such as football game, is more enjoyable, of course, than watching them on TV. Simply because it is healthier, more realistic and more able to share my feeling with thousands of the fans who are with me at the same place. Watching a play, concert or any live performance on TV is harmful because we all know that the image on TV is composed of electromagnetic waves that are very harmful to the eyes of anyone of us. But when I am in theatre or stadium, there is no bad radiation because I see the players themselves. Watching any live performance on TV, even if the TV is smart 3D one, is not real; it is just a picture. But when I am at the stadium, I can see the whole show by my naked eyes not just what the director and the cameraman are showing me. You can see how the fans interact with the show , and you can follow certain player that you like most. You can see how he is playing at all times so, what will you do if the cameraman does not make him show all the time? Watching live performance with thousands of fans is amazing. You can share all your feeling with them whether it is a good feeling at victory or bad one when loss. Seeing thousands of people around you is enjoyable in itself . You can make a very strong friendship relationship with one you meet at a theatre or stadium, that happens to me, for example , but at home how can I do this ? Never. As an evidence when anyone sees a football game at a caf with a lot of people, he/she enjoys himself/herself more than watching at home alone or with just two or three friends . So finally, I believe that attending live performance, whatever it is, is healthier and more enjoyable than watching it on TV.

Fans (fanatical ) / audience of concert , seminar , presentation / spectators / I didn't like the restaurant ; the food was cold , the service was bad and the restaurant was noisy .

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. In my opinion, one must never judge a person by external appearances. Because he/she is may be better than me, he/she is passing through very bad circumstances or it is not the right and the accurate scale to judge people. May be I look wonderful in all my external appearance; my shape, my hair, my clothes etc. however, I do not do any thing useful for the society or the people. And there is another one ,in contrast, whose shape is not good ( i.e he/she does not follow the new lines of fashion or cares about his/her shape ) but he/she is for example a doctor who treat people or a teacher who teach people or ..etc. My be this person, that I judge him/her by the external appearance only, is passing through very bad circumstances; lose his/her job, lose one of his/her relatives recently and he/she is sad or it could be any other bad circumstances that any person, when he pass through it, does not pay attention to his/her external appearances. What I want to state here is that judging people by external appearances is not accurate or right role. Because, of course, you will misjudge a lot of people for the reasons I have mentioned above or other reasons that I do not mention. So to conclude, judging people by their external appearances is wrong because they can be better than me, they may pass bad circumstances and, finally, it is not an accurate role.