Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mr. C. Caldwell Financial Times 1 Southwark Bridge London SE1 9HL Dear Mr. Caldwell,
To support your statement that not a shred of evidence emerged at the trial to indicate that Mr Zimmermans shooting of Martin was motivated by racism, you state that Zimmermans neighbourhood was mixed with a 20 percent black population. Shooting a black unarmed teenager in a 20 percent black neighbourhood is not a strong justification to exclude racism as a motive just as one claiming, Im not racist because my best friend is black or because I have dated a black girl is not a strong justification to exclude racism as an excuse for one using the N word against a black person. You also write, He does not fit the stereotype of a segregationist southern white which you suggest is because he is of Peruvian descent. Although Zimmermans father is a white American of German descent and his mother from Peru, however, because he is not 100 per cent white does not mean that racism should be excluded as a factor for the shooting as racism is not only restricted to those who are 100 percent white. You also mention, There is a lobby for racial justice that can be summoned into action at a moments notice and to them this shooting of an unarmed black teenager carried an echo of segregationist violence. This lobbying you note put political pressure on the Governor to charge Zimmerman. It is essential for one to lobby when justice has been denied. If the tobacco, banking and pharmaceutical sectors can lobby for causes, which are sometimes detrimental to the general public, why shouldnt a community lobby for justice when one of their members has been murdered in cold blood? In addition, you write, Mr. Zimmermans case that he was defending himself appeared strong and His head was bloodied and his clothing torn when they arrived, consistent with his story of self-defence. Sir, people in my community see things differently. We dont believe Zimmerman has a strong case for using self-defence as a justification for killing Martin. To help you understand why we see things differently, perhaps we should look at the case from another point of view and then we can ask some tough questions. Here is a scenario: A young white boy who loves rock music visits his friend in a certain neighbourhood that is 25% populated with white people. This young white boy is holding lets say a can of diet coke and a mars chocolate bar. He is wearing an Arsenal football jersey with the name Thierry Henry inscribed on the back. As the white boy is walking to his friends place, a black patrol officer guarding the area sees the white boy and concludes that the boy is up to no good because there has been some theft in the neighbourhood in the past. The patrol officer calls the police to say that he has seen a white boy that looks suspicious. The police tell him not to follow the boy. The Black patrol officer disobeys the instruction and chases the white boy and catches up with him. A confrontation ensues and five minutes later, the black patrol officer shoots the unarmed white boy. The Black patrol officer is not arrested until say fifty days later. The case goes to court and during the proceedings, the defence lawyer presents evidence to show that the black patrol officer acted in self-defence. Pictures of the black patrol officers bloodied head and torn clothes are presented as evidence. At the conclusion of the trial, an 80 percent populated black jury find the black patrol officer not guilty of the cold-blooded murder of this young unarmed white boy. Later on, one of the black jurors tells a BBC journalist, Race did not come up during deliberations. Based on the above hypothetical scenario, one wonders how the family of the young white boy will feel? Would the community to which the white boy belonged not be justified to lobby for justice for the cold-blooded murder of the boy? Would the Black patrol officers strong case for self-defence hold water with the general public? How would the young boys community feel hearing that the cause of his death was due to his hip-hop rock lifestyle? How would the young boys family feel hearing a talk show presenter say on a TV, I am urging the parents of white youngsters particularly to not let their children go out wearing hoodies Thierry Henry inscribed Arsenal jerseys ? Would the young boys community be happy that his name has been smeared in the public in order to justify the killing by the Black patrol guard? Would the young white boys community be happy to know that a man can be sentenced to prison for two years for participating in a dog fighting and dog execution ring, while the black patrol officer who killed the young white boy is free to roam the streets? How would the young boys community feel if they hear commentators and analysts saying, Why all the fuss about the death of a little white boy when everyday, white men kill each other in many white neighborhoods. Unfortunately, I dont have the answers to these questions.
Sir, one reason why people in my community view the Zimmerman case differently is because of our personal experiences. Please spare me a moment to tell you of my own experience. Sometime in 2009, while on a business trip to Jersey, I was stopped and searched by the authorities. After making an official complaint, I was informed that the reason why I was stopped and searched was because I looked suspicious as I was wearing a business suit and had a silver coloured Bose headphone over my ears. My brother who is a consultant medical doctor also had a similar experience. While he was on his lunch break, he went for a walk and some people in the neighbourhood called the police to say that they saw a Black man in the neighbourhood looking suspicious. The police stopped my brother and searched him. My brother found the experience so distressful that when he made an official complaint, he told a police officer, I dont want my son to go through this same experience. There are some experiences that change you from a Trevor McDonald to a Malcolm X. Sir, while you may not see the Zimmerman issue as racially motivated, my community sees it differently. But Ahmed, you are being oversensitive some may say. Others may even go further and say, Why are black people always playing the victim and bringing up the race card whenever they fall into any misfortune? If one works hard and is successful one will transcend race just like Obama who never plays the victim or brings up the race card. In response, I say, even President Obama like most black people, sees things differently. At a recent press conference while addressing the Zimmerman case, he said, Its important to recognize that the AfricanAmerican community is looking at this issue through a set of experiences and a history that doesnt go away. He continued, There are very few African-American men in this country who havent had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me. From Obamas statement, one can see that based on historical and current realities, an oppressed race often sees things in a different light. Moreover, I dont agree that the civil rights activists were attracted to the Zimmerman case because it had an ultimately illusory conformity to Jim Crow archetypes. Instead, I believe that the case conforms to a 21st Jim Crow archetype. After all, just like how the murderers of Emmet Till were acquitted in 1955, the murderer of another innocent unarmed black teenager has been acquitted in 2013. This is reality and not illusion. Furthermore, the fact that as you pointed out, Young American men of modest means murder each other frequently without drawing media attention, is not a necessary and sufficient condition for the Zimmerman case not to draw the attention of the media and activists. If the Zimmerman case is ignored or allowed to be swept under the carpet, it would send the wrong signal because if someone can murder another person in cold blood and get away with it because his case for defending himself appears strong, then what stops millions of other Zimmermans around the world from conducting similar acts? After all, Martin Luther King was right when he said, Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. In conclusion, the people in my community and I see the Zimmerman case from a different lens. We dont see Zimmermans self-defence claim as a strong one, we see it has an irrelevant one; we dont see our call for racial justice as lobbying, we see it as what is right and necessary; we dont see the shooting as not being motivated by racism, we see the shooting as a consequence of the criminalisation of our community by an institutionally racist criminal justice system and media; we dont see the case as an illusion of past injustice, we st see it as a realistic 21 century form of past injustice melted on our community. In short, we see unfairness, we see injustice and we see inequality. Selah Ahmed Sule, CFA suleaos@gmail.com