Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Lucero Pulido-Aguirres, A095 784 426 (BIA July 29, 2013)

Lucero Pulido-Aguirres, A095 784 426 (BIA July 29, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 233|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case "in an abundance of caution" for consideration of whether the respondent was eligible for a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A) based on her marriage to a U.S. citizen. The decision was written by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case "in an abundance of caution" for consideration of whether the respondent was eligible for a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A) based on her marriage to a U.S. citizen. The decision was written by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Aug 02, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
   i
Executive Oce r Immigraon Reiew
Board of Immigration AppealsOce ofthe Clerk
5107eesburg like. Sute 200Fa Church gnia 22/
HS/ICE Oce of Chief Counsel TUSP.O. Box 25158Phoenx, AZ 8002Name: PULDOAGUIRRES LUCERO A 095-784-426Date of ths notce:7/29/201
Encosed s a copy of he Board's decson and oder n te above-erenced case.nclosue
Pl Mb:Ad-B, C K
Sncerely,
D
c
Donna Car Cef Cerk
hk 
Cite as: Lucero Pulido-Aguirres, A095 784 426 (BIA July 29, 2013)
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
 
U. Dpant of Jusc
Execuve Oce
r Im
gaton RevewDecision of e Board of Imiaon AppalsFalls Cuch
Virga
22041
 File: A095 784 426 -Tucson, 
 Date:
re:LUCERO PUOAGURES a.ka Lucero PuldoAgrre REMOVAL ROCEEDGS APPEAON BEHAL O RESPODENT Pro seON BEHALF OF HSMatthew W KauSenor Atoey APLCAION ContinuanceORDER:
JUL2 9
2013
e responent has appealed the Iation Judge's Jne 2, 2012, decson to te extenttat te maton dge dened the oton r a contnanceWe acowledge te reasonng r the aton uge's dena of te oton r a contnce Nonetheess, n unance o cauton, e n t appropate to reand the record r te aon udge de pares to etene the respondent's elbity r a provsonal ulawl presence aver
See
 Applcaton r Provsonal Unlaw Presence Waver (Fo 601A) Accordingy, terecord s reane to te Iiaton udge r her proceedngs consstent wth te regong opnon d r the eny of a new decson
Cite as: Lucero Pulido-Aguirres, A095 784 426 (BIA July 29, 2013)
 
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTCEEXECTVE OFFICE FOR IGTION REVIEWUNTED STATES GTON CORTFile: A095-784-26n the Matter of00 West CongressSuite 00 TUCSON, ARZONune 26, 2012 LCERO PLIDOAGIRRES))))IN REOVAL PROCEEDNGSRESPONDENTCARGESection 22(a) (6) (A)(i)o the Act, as amended. APPLCATONConcluion vountary departureON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT PATRICIA MEIA, EsquireON BEHALF OF S ATTHEW KAUFAN, ASSISTNT CIEF COUNSELORAL DECISON AND ORDER OF THE IMIGATION DGE The respondent, whose nae is Ms Lucero Pulido-Aguires,is a emale natie and citizen o Mexico who entered into thenited States through Nogales, Aizona, December 2008 ilegalywithout beig inpected The Deatment of Homeland Security stated these emoval proceedings by filing a Notice o Appear See Ehibit 

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
Parn Akuma added this note
MOTION TO CONTINUE - I-601A - Denial overturned simply out of an "abundance of caution" but decision finds IJ properly denied because I-601A law not in effect at the time of ruling.
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->