• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
The Atkin Paper Series
Under the Microscope:Israeli and Bi-nationalPeace NGOs
Yosef Kedmi
March 2009
 
1
 About the Atkin Paper Series
Thanks to the generosity of the
 Atkin Foundation
, the
International Centre for theStudy of Radicalisation and Political Violence (ICSR)
offers young leaders fromIsrael and the Arab world the opportunity to come to London for a period of fourmonths. The purpose of the fellowship is to provide young leaders from Israel and the Arab world with an opportunity to develop their ideas on how to further peace andunderstanding in the Middle East through research, debate and constructive dialoguein a neutral political environment. The end result is a policy paper that will provide a
deeper understanding and a new perspective on a specic topic or event.
Editor
Dr. Peter R. Neumann
DirectorInternational Centre for the Study ofRadicalisation and Political Violence(ICSR), King’s College London
Editor
 Jeni Mitchell 
King’s College London
Editorial Assistant
Katie Rothman
Project Manager, International Centre forthe Study of Radicalisation and PoliticalViolence (ICSR), King’s College London
To order hardcopies or contact the editor,please write to mail@icsr.info. All papers in the
 Atkin Paper Series
 can be downloaded free of chargeat
www.icsr.info
 About Yosef Kedmi
 Y 
osef Kedmi holds a Law (LL.B) and a Government and Politics (BA) degreefrom the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Centre (IDC) and is currently writing hisBusiness Law Masters’ thesis (LL.M) on minority rights in the Israeli educationsystem. He is an active member within the OneVoice Movement advocating forregional peace. Kedmi also previously assisted in providing free legal aid for the
needy in the Tel Aviv county courts’ executioners’ ofce.
Summary
T
he ongoing conict in the Middle East has given rise to a myriad of conictresolution and conict management organisations that collectively invest
enormous effort and funds into trying to improve relations between peoplesand promote peace within their respective communities. These organisations– sponsored by individual donations as well as international governments andinstitutions – have encountered major problems, not least in trying to establishmeasurements of success.Through analysis of the activities, audiences and self-assessment mechanisms
of peace and conict resolution organisations working in Israel or bi-nationally (that
is, with Palestinians) this paper aims to provide a better understanding of the currentstatus and activities of P/CROs in this region, as well as which areas are in needof more attention. This is achieved by evaluating four main comparative criteria ofanalysis – Finance, self evaluation, outreach and transparency.The aim of this paper is not to undermine the important work of organisations,
but rather to promote efciency in working towards the aim of peace which they
all share.
 
2 3
Under the Microscope:Israeli and Bi-nationalPeace NGOs
By Yosef Kedmi 
Introduction
The ongoing conict in the Middle East has given rise to a myriad of conictresolution and conict management organisations that collectively invest enormous
effort and funds into trying to improve relations between peoples and promote peacewithin their respective communities. These organisations – sponsored by individualdonations as well as international governments and institutions – have encounteredmajor problems, not least in trying to establish measurements of success.The ‘peace industry’, as it is often referred to, aims to promote unquestionablypositive values, but spending is too often consumed by over-sized mechanismsthat are based on self-sustainment and often are not as cost-effective or productiveas they could and should be. Misunderstandings and cultural differences betweenfunders and people working on the ground have exacerbated this problem. Realguidance, in other words, is required.Grassroots support is needed now – more urgently than ever – for an agreementthat can be accepted by all the peoples of the region based on the hope for a bettertomorrow, regardless of the current animosity, mistrust and fundamental differencesin religious background and narratives. To create such an atmosphere and generate
real change, peace and conict resolution organisations (P/CROs) need to be as
productive as possible, given that funding is scarce and radical and violent positions
are amplied by the media and attract more attention and support than ever before.
This paper analyses the activities, audiences and self-assessment mechanisms
of peace and conict resolution organisations working in Israel or bi-nationally
(that is, with Palestinians). The aim is to evaluate their effectiveness and relevance,identifying strengths as well as weak points and failures. Four main criteria guidethe analysis:
•
Finance
The paper aims to understand the nancial situation of P/CROs,
including recent changes and constraints. What are their budget priorities?How can their spending become more effective and focused?
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...