Pro rogues want more money to feed their illegal Legal Aid as rogue government continues proroguing a legitimate

Constitution independent judicial court With pro rogue Senators http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2013/08/17/skn-annual-canadian-bar-meeting-access-tojustice.html http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Canadian+Association+calls+quick+abysmal+access+justice/880 3590/story.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/161089364/True-Pro-Bono-Gets-the-Bone

The outlaws protect outlaws prerequisite to a thriving business of the NEWS Never Ending War Story

Section VI: A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION I. THE RATIONALES FOR THE IDEAL OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE
In evaluating the current condition and performance of the legal aid system in Ontario and how well equipped it is to face future challenges in the years ahead, it is obviously important, and indeed necessary, to have a clear focus on some broad normative reference points or benchmarks against which both the performance and potential of the system can be evaluated. This was squarely recognized in the McCamus Report 1 in 1997, and in important background research that the McCamus Task Force commissioned. 2 I here set out briefly what I view as the most compelling normative justifications for an obligation on the state to ensure access to justice.

a) Access to Justice and the Rule of Law

The first and most important rationale for viewing access to justice as an important ideal is based on the close relationship of access to justice to the rule of law. The development of democratic societies has been accompanied by the adoption of the notion of the

rule of law - the replacement of rule by arbitrary measures or by unchecked discretion with rule by law. While the content of the rule of law has been subject to much debate over the years, 3 even minimalist conceptions of the rule of law espouse as central the notions of "natural justice" or due process as these concepts are widely understood. If the rule of law is considered to be based on laws that are knowable and consistently enforced such that individuals are able to avail themselves of the law, then individuals must have the tools to access the systems that administer those laws. Thomas Hobbes argued that the rule of law must satisfy an obligation which Professor David Dyzenhaus has called the "publicity condition". This means that individuals, in committing their obedience to the sovereign's rule, are promised the protections and benefits of law. Dyzenhaus argues that the publicity condition is not so much an external limit on the sovereign's legal power, but what the sovereign has to do in order to exercise power through law. Dyzenhaus argues further that part of the obligation that attaches to the rule of law, especially as that law becomes more complex (as many of our laws have, including criminal law, family law, immigration law, and social assistance law) is for the government to provide the resources so that people can not only know the law, but also gain access to it. This publicity condition obviously does not imply that the state is under an obligation to ensure that every individual has a grasp of its entire set of laws. Actual knowledge of the law is not considered a right under even the most progressive liberal theory, so long as every person has an opportunity to know the law. This means that when individuals are unable to understand the law and its impact and are unable to exercise effectively their rights and responsibilities under the law,

the state has an obligation

to ensure that

they have the resources to do so

http://www.scribd.com/doc/145588734/Bar-to-Bar-Justice-Causes-Eccentric-to-Saddle-Up-to-the-Bar

www.SolarGhost13.com

The Constitution Charter guarantees equal protection presumably from the Criminal element mandatory the courts be adept to efficiently effectively determine who is of the criminal element demonstrating due diligence to deterrence www.Justice13.com