Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Abele's Referendum Veto 2011 and Response

Abele's Referendum Veto 2011 and Response

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5|Likes:
Abele's Referendum Veto 2011 and Response
Abele's Referendum Veto 2011 and Response

More info:

Published by: Chris Capper Liebenthal on Aug 22, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/15/2014

pdf

text

original

 
RESPONSE TO ABELE'S MTA COUNTY VETO:On Facebook 
Below is the Veto that County Executive submitted after the close of business onTuesday, August 28, thereby precluding the posting of a 24 hour required notice for aspecial meeting of the Board of Supervisors. He thus made sure that meeting theWednesday deadline to submit a ballot item for the November presidential was not possible. So much for the actions of one who is part of the 1%.Like· ·Share· EditEdit · August 31, 2012
Richard Miller likes this.
BOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ~ Now I KNOW~ "L" LOSER!Abele is a billionaire 1%-er, heir to the Boston Scientific fortune, who thought $19,000was too much money to spend on direct democracy. Ridiculous.My husband Jim and I called his bluff by saying we, a retired couple from the elite (ha)community of Riverwest, would use our own IRA money to fund the referendum. Theusual and customary cost, which he quoted in n email to us, was $19,000. He changes itto $39,000.00 in this document for some reason. And for some reason, (incompetence?)it took the County WEEKS to figure out how much ink & paper would cost to print thereferendum when they gave us the original quote. Then they go and change it.HE WROTE UP A CONTRACT STATING -
QUID PRO QUO
- He would not veto itif we paid for the referendum, thus proving he's shameless -letting Jim and I pay for our own direct democracy if we want it, when he wouldn't even NOTICE the $19,000 out of his OWN pocket This also shows he really didn't want to hear from his constituents. Notenough to pay $19,000, a real true pittance for someone with a budget bigger than theCounty itself.To me, this also proved he doesn't support money OUT OF POLITICS, AS ANHONEST POLITICIAN WOULD.Even worse, he has shown he was not telling the truth in the above statement when hesays he believes what Justice Stevens wrote, in his dissent to the Citizens United ruling,
 
"a democracy cannot function effectively when its constituent members believe laws arebeing bought and sold" 
, and that he really DOES BELIEVE the plutocrats, who happento include him and the MEN who wrote the corporate county takeover bill AB85/SB95,should rule the County. It was written with the help of Representative Joe Sanfelippo(and probably ALEC), and the Greater Milwaukee Committee, consisting of industry"leaders" and self-proclainmed "job creators" (who do not create any jobs, but send themoverseas and eviscerate unions at home and hire prison slave labor).They did not consult a single person acting as a CONSTITUENT during this process,according to a report by the Milwaukee Journal -Sentinel. They only talked amongst their  business associates, and no constituents, apparently believing that what's good for  business is good for Milwaukee. I tend to think that's a limited, elitist, job-killing view.The gist of this turn of affairs is that Abele vetoed a direct democracy referendum because he did NOT want to hear from We the People, all the while implying that it was because it was NOT a local issue and didn't want to spend taxpayer money (except for Jim's and Mine, decimating our retirement account), then turned around
made
it local byworking with his local old boys club, consisting of corporate power-brokers, on a statelaw that would give him autocratic powers to sell and/or lease Milwaukee County property (which includes our magnificent, famous parks), Milwaukee Harbor, and jobs programs for the poor and disabled.Undemocratic, elitist, truthLESS, self-serving.According toi AB85/SB95, which were passed despite many constituent protests to thecontrary at the County listening sessions, the County Board will no longer be able tonegotiate these sales or leases, only approve or vote against the final product. This is aform of democracy?I think not.It is corporate monarchy at it's worst. They would be more at home in China.The final lie is the referendum. It allows the public to vote only on cutting the CountyBoard Supervisors' salaries, to a POVERTY WAGE of $24,000.00/year. At that rate of  pay, they'd better all stay single, have no children, or get paid off for deals from localcorporate interests.What do YOU think will happen? And what will happen to our county bus system, our  parks, our harbor, our poor on welfare, our disabled in the County works programs, our airport which really makes the County some good money, one of the few solvent airportsin the U.S.? All we can do is watch, now.This was a State bill, and our Governor signed itWhat will happen to Milwaukee? It's like Abele hates Milwaukee as much as ScottWalker!Milwaukee will make temporary money from the sales, and then, like Texas, try to buy back what was ours when the price becomes too exorbitant to rent it. Meanwhile, Abele's books will look good - big income (and HUGE outgo/losses for we who love and livehere).What was wrong with Boston, anyhow, that Abele left it? He came to Milwaukee to runhis Dad's Argosy Foundation from Milwaukee? I don't get it.He made lots of friends by giving money to liberal causes, like Planned Parenthood andgay rights and the arts, simultaneously trying to take over all power for himself and hiscorporate buddies in Milwaukee. And disbelieving in direct democracy.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->