Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)

Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 469|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected the respondent's argument that a theft offense to which he pled nolo contendere was not a "conviction" under Section 101(a)(48) of the INA because it was processed as an "infraction" and he was not provided with the right to a jury trial or appointed counsel. The Board found the argument was foreclosed under its decision in Matter of Cuellar-Gomez, 25 l&N Dec. 850 (BIA 2012). The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected the respondent's argument that a theft offense to which he pled nolo contendere was not a "conviction" under Section 101(a)(48) of the INA because it was processed as an "infraction" and he was not provided with the right to a jury trial or appointed counsel. The Board found the argument was foreclosed under its decision in Matter of Cuellar-Gomez, 25 l&N Dec. 850 (BIA 2012). The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Aug 22, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/27/2014

pdf

text

original

 
UGAS GIL, JOSE LUISPO BOX 65215SALT LAKE CIY, U 84165Name: UGAS GIL JOSE LUIS
 m of 
Executive Oce r Immgration Revew
Boad ofImmigation AppealsOce ofthe Clek
57 Leesbug Pike, Sute 2 Fs Chuch l'gmi 22./
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel -SC2975 Decker Lake Dr. StopCWest Valley Cty UT 84119078-903-173Date of ths notice:8/4 /2013
Enclosed s a copy of the Board's decson and order n he above-rerenced case.Enclosre
 Mb:Ply Rg
Sncerely,
D
c
Donna CarrChe Clerk
hk: 
Cite as: Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)
 
US Depaent of Jutce
Executive
O
e
r
Imation RevewFas Crh, Vrgna

File:A078 903 173 -Sat Lae Cit, UTIn re JOSE LUIS UGAS GIN MOVA PROCEEDNGSAPPEAON BEHALF OF SPONDENTPro seON BEHALF OF DHS Kain Ivany
Deision of the Board ofaion Appeals
Date
U 14 203
Assistant Chef CouselCHRGE Notice Sec.22(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), &N Act [8U.S.C.§82(a)(2)(A)(i)(I)]Cie involving moal uideSec.22(a)(6)(A)(i),&N Act 8 U.S.C. §  82(a)(6)(A)(i)Present without being admitted or paoledAPPLCATION Adjustment of statusThe espondent appeas the Iigration Judge's August 24, 202, decision denyinghisapplication r adjusent of staus ude section 245(a) of the migtion and Nationaity Act,8 U.SC. § 1255(a). The appeal will be dismissed.The onl issue in ths appeal is weter the mmigation Judge ered in nding therespondent ineligible  adjusment of stats under section 245(a) of the Act bed on isinadmissibili due to his two convictions r crimes involving moral tupitude (J at 34).On appeal, te respondent contends tat his 1993 the conviction in violation of Caliia PenalCodesection 84(a), to whic he ped
nolo contendere,
isnot a "conviction as den bysection 0(a)(8) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 0(a)(48), because it was pocessed as an inactionand,  a esult, he was not povided with the ight to a ju
ta
o appointed cousel.
According to the respondent, the lack of these due process potections emoves his oense omthepurview of section 0
I
(a)( 48) of the Act.otwithstanding the reondents contentions on aeal, e nd no reaon to distr theImiation Judges conclsion that his 1993 conviction is a conviction r immigration oses (IJ. at 112).
See
8 CF.R § 1003.(d)(3)(ii) (2013)
(de novo
review) Asund bythe Imigation Judge, the respondent case is goveed by the Boards recent decisionin
Matter of Cuelar-Gomez
25 &N Dec 850 (BIA 2012) (.J at ). n
Matter o/uear-Gomez
we concluded that a rmal judgent of gilt of  aien enteed b a municipa cou is a 
We rel on the men aised in the respondents Notice of Appeal and 1page statemente respondent did not le a ll bief in support of his appeal.
Cite as: Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)
 
A08 903 173convtion ndr ction 101a)48)A) of th Act if th pocding in which th jdnt wa ntrd wr gnuin criina procding
ee i; see also Maer of Rivera-Valencia
4 & Dc 484 BA 008);
Maer of Esamizar
3 I&  Dc 684 BIA 004)A nd by th Immigration Jdg, h rpondnt 993 pa to an "inaction,,i conviction ndr ction 101a)48) of th Act inamch a it rquir a nding of guit byond a raonab doubt d aord th rpondnt gratr right upon appa J at 914)
ee
Caiia Pna Cod ction 197
People v. Prince
 CaApp3d pp 9, 333 1976)
Maer of CuelarGomez supra
at 84 Likwi, in
Maer of CuellarGomez
w coniddth  rgmnt raid by th rpondnt rgading hi contntion hat hi procding wrnot gnn criina procding bca h wa not aodd appointd con and a jry
eei
Undr th circtanc th Imigration Judg dciion nding th rpondnt inigib r adjutnt of tatu du to hi inadmiibiity i pportd by h rcod IJ at 
I
4)Th rpondnt did not appy r a waivr of hi inadiibiity undr ction 
I
h) of th Act,8 UC § 8h) J at 7)inay, th rpondnt ha ubmid vidnc that h d th rqird vont dprbond bt did not  within th day ti iit t by th Immiation Jdg IJat 1)
eeMaer of Gamero
4&  Dc 4 BA 00)  Dpnt of Homand crity "DH)ar that th vonty dpa piod cnot b rintatd
ee i
Howvr, th DHaccptd h rpondnt bond r, w wi rintat h vouty dp piodAccodingy, th appa wi b diidORR Th appa i dimidURTHR ORDR Prat to th mmigraion Judg ordr nd conditiond poncopic with condition t h by th Imigraon Jdg and h tatut, th pondnt ipmitd to vountaiy dpa th Unitd at, without xpn to h Govnt, wihin60 day om th dat of thi odr o y xtnion byond that ti  ay b td by thDprtnt of Homand cuity "DH)
ee
ction 40Bb) of th Iigation d ationaiy Act, 8 UC § 9cb)
 see also
8 CR §§406c) In th vnt thrpondnt f to vontariy dpat th Unitd tat, th rpondnt ha b rovd aprovidd in h Immiation Judg ord OTICE If th rpondnt i to vounty dpart h Unitd tat withinthtimpriod pcid, or y xtnion gtd by th DH, th rpondnt hab bjct to a civipnaty a povidd by th rguation d th taut and ha b inigib r a priod of10 y r any thr rif nd ction 40 d ction 40A, 4, 48, and 49 of thAct
ee
ction 40Bd) of h ActWARNG f t rpondnt  a motion to ropn o rconidr pior to h xpiration ofh vount dparr priod t h abov t grant of vontay dpartr i autoaticaytinatd; t priod aowd r vonary dpu i not tayd, tod, o xtndd If thant of vount dpatur i atoaticay tinatd upon h ing of a otion, th pnatir fair to dp undr ction 40Bd) of th Act ha not appy
ee
8 CR§ 406))
Cite as: Jose Luis Ugas Gil, A078 903 173 (BIA Aug. 14, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->