♦
On September 25, 2000, the US Supreme Court affirmed that pursuant to CERCLA,the federal government has a (
unrecorded easement by implication : a UnitedStates Congressional incorporeal right
) right of access to contaminated propertydespite a landowner's opposition to such access {New Orleans v. US, 99-1805}[Note:Chapter 103:CERCLA, (Title) 42 U.S.C. 9604(e) paragraphs (1) and (3)(B)(C)accords EPA a statutory right of access to potentially contaminated property]. EPAand its representatives may enter property, at reasonable times, if EPA determines that"there is a reasonable basis to believe there may be a release or threat of release of ahazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant." Hence, if CERCLA contaminationhas migrated under or upon a property via ground water, an unrecorded easementimpacts the property.
♦
In the
Lobato v. Taylor
Case No. 00SC 527, April 28, 2003, 32 Colo. Law. 231 (June2003) the majority decision concluded that contrary to the usual practice in the legalcommunity that generally only documents in the chain of title must be searched todetermine relevant interests in real property, more is required when it appears thatoutside interests may affect title. In such instances, an individual has a duty toinvestigate these other interests, and is charged with knowledge of the facts to whichthe investigation would have led.
♦
Colorado approved Real Estate forms including the "Contract to Buy and Sell RealEstate" require disclosure of all "
unrecorded easements
";
♦
A developer, seller, or contractor may be liable for damages for fraud or negligentmisrepresentation when it makes incorrect statements regarding the nature or qualityof construction, soil conditions, the status of title, or the performance to be expectedof a building. Such fraud or misrepresentation, if committed before the execution of acontract, may allow the contract and any limitations of liability within its terms to beset aside.
♦
Pursuant to Colorado 12-61-405 the Real estate Commission may impose fines, issueletters of admonition, refuse, revoke or suspend a subdivision developer's registrationshould the developer:
(b)
Has misrepresented or concealed any material fact from a purchaser of anyinterest in subdivision;(j)Commits any act that constitutes a violation of the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act", article 1 of title 6, C.R.S.;
(m)
Has failed to disclose encumbrances to prospective purchasers or has failed totransfer clear title at the time of sale, if the parties agreed that such transfer would be made at that time.
♦
Tort Claims for Improper Disclosure - Restatement 2
nd
of Torts Sec. 529:A representation stating the truth as far as it goes but which the maker knows or believes to be materially misleading because of his failure to state additional or qualifying matters is a fraudulent misrepresentation. A premises owner is liable for acontractor's injuries, only when the owner fails to warn about a hidden hazardous
Leave a Comment