Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By: Kathleen Sciacca, M.A. Executive Director, Sciacca Comprehensive Service Development
for Mental Illness, Drug Addiction and Alcoholism, MIDAA, e-mail: ksciacca@pobox.com
URL: http://pobox.com/~dualdiagnosis
Invited response to section on co-occurring addictive and mental disorders. Published letter to
the editor. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (66) 3, July,1996.
To the Editor,
The opening article of the Journal's special section (Osher & Drake,1996) which traces the
history of separating mental health and addictive services, is an important contribution to the
literature on dual disorders. Since we are now in the early stages of the evolution of dual
diagnosis services, however, I believe it is important to provide a more complete and detailed
In response to the article by Drake, Mueser, Clark and Wallach (1996) which states "Ten years
ago the only treatment options available for people with co-occurring substance abuse and severe
mental illness were parallel treatments in separate programs" (p.49), the record requires
correction. Dual diagnosis treatment interventions and "integrated" programs that truly adapted
to the needs of severely mentally ill chemical abusers (MICA) began in 1984 (Gigliotti,1986,
Sciacca 1987a,1987b) in a New York State outpatient psychiatric facility. In 1985 these
integrated treatment programs were implemented across multiple program sites (Sciacca,1987b).
Concurrently, treatment and program elements were taught through training seminars in New
York as well as nationally. Early articles by Gigliotti, 1986 and Sciacca, 1987a, 1987b, outlined
these processes and documented their starting dates. In September, 1986, the New York State
(NYS) Commission on Quality of Care (CQC) released the findings of eighteen months of
1
research. Its report (Sundram, Platt, Cashen, 1986) described the detachment and downward
spiral of dually diagnosed consumers who were bounced among different systems with "no
definitive locus of responsibility." As a result, Governor Cuomo designated the NYS Office of
Mental Health as the lead agency responsible for coordinating collective efforts for this
population. CQC proceeded to visit the dual diagnosis programs developed in 1984, and declared
the treatment interventions, the training, and integrated programs to be positive solutions to the
dilemmas (Gigliotti, 1986). TIME magazine learned of the CQC report, and CQC suggested that
TIME magazine investigate these programs. A reporter sat in on treatment groups, interviewed
consumers and the director, and attended related training seminars. The story (Gorman, 1987)
was held due to an international crisis, and later published with a survey of national dual
diagnosis statistics (Ridgely, Osher, & Talbott, 1987). Hence, the "doubly troubled" were
The Governor's task force put forward a vision for statewide program development. The "MICA
Training Site for Program and Staff Development, New York Statewide" was created to attain
that vision (Sciacca 1987b, 1991). Short term and on-going training and program development
were offered to hundreds of treatment providers at both state and local mental health and
substance abuse agencies. Consumer led and family support programs were also developed. The
state produced a training video that demonstrated the integrated treatment model. The CQC
report called for "invested," "sustained," leadership. However, the training site closed in 1990
due to budgetary considerations. MICA programs and groups that grew out of this model
continue to be an important nucleus of our present services in New York State and nationally.
2
The original treatment interventions evolved in "adaptation" to the needs of MICA clients.
Methods and philosophies clearly differed from traditional substance abuse treatment.
Consumers who were actively abusing substances, physically addicted, unstable, and
approach to denial and resistance, involving acceptance of all symptoms was employed.
Consumers participated in treatment groups without pressure to self disclose, and explored topics
from their own perspectives. Subsequent providers either learned from this model, or came upon
similar processes through their own experimentation. Presently, we find consistent similarities
across the interventions that have evolved for the dually diagnosed, thereby validating the need
The process of "interagency" program development implemented in 1985 (Sciacca, 1987b) has
escalated in the state of Michigan. A project that included formal cross-training and cross-
systems program development was jointly initiated by the split bureaus (Sciacca & Thompson,
1996) in 1993. It demonstrated that continuity of care across systems, including trained
professionals from a variety of disciplines, is attainable and results in improved, less costly
services for the dually diagnosed. Every program in both service delivery systems (across two
In the Journal special section, Green (1996) diagrams for us the serious inadequacies of our
divided systems, and the resulting deterioration and anguish for the consumer. In contrast, her
participation in an integrated dual diagnosis program that was accepting of all of her symptoms
3
Our history thus far demonstrates a lack of invested, sustained leadership that is capable of
developing a cohesive national agenda for dual disorders. It is our responsibility to change the
course of this history to meet the needs of dually diagnosed consumers and their families
References:
outcome of substance disorder in persons with severe mental illness. American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry.(66),42-51.
Harlem Valley P.C. Quality of Care Newsletter by the N.Y.S. Commission on Quality of Care.
Issue28,p.9
Gorman,Christine,(1987, August 3)"Bad Trips for the Doubly Troubled" TIME Magazine,
pg.58.
Osher,F.C. & Drake,R.E.(1996) Reversing a history of unmet needs: Approaches to care for
Orthopsychiatry,66,4-11.
Ridgely MS, Osher FC, & Talbott JA, (1987)"Chronic Mentally Ill young adults with
substance abuse problems: Treatment and Training issues. Baltimore Mental Health Policy
Studies,UniversityofMarylandSchoolofMedicine.
Sciacca, K., (1987a,July)"New Initiatives in the Treatment of the Chronic Patient with
Alcohol/Substance Use Problems." TIE Lines, Vol.IV, No. 3. (Publication of the Information
ExchangeofYoungAdultChronicPatients.)
4
Sciacca, K., (1987b) "Alcohol and Substance Abuse Programs at New York State Psychiatric
Centers Develop and Expand." This Month in Mental Health, NYSOMH, Vol.10, No.2, pg.6,&
AID Bulletin Addiction Intervention with the Disabled, Winter Vol.9, No.2, p.1-3.
Mentally Ill Individuals with Substance Disorders." New Directions for Mental Health Services,
Dual Diagnosis of Major Mental Illness and Substance Disorders. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, #50.)
Sciacca, K. & Hatfield, A.B., (1995) "The Family and the Dually Diagnosed Patient." Double
209.
Treatment Across Systems for Dual Diagnosis: Mental Illness, Drug Addiction and Alcoholism,
Sundram, CJ, Platt, IL, Cashen, JA, (1986,September)"The Multiple Dilemmas of the
Multiply Disabled." Albany, NYS Commission on Quality of Care for the Mentally Disabled
report.