lmplications for Missouri
Leaderless resjstanceposes
anumbeT ofissues
for
N4isso!rl.
Those whochoose
lo
ac1
aslone wolvesmake theworkol
law
entorcement morechallenging.
A
limilednumber ol con'spirators
and
iew,
ji
any, linkslo
larger
organizalions
lessens
thelikelihood
of an
inveslrgalor iinding oulinlormation
on
a
plot.
Both Timolhy
N,4cveigh
and Eric Budolph
had
ties
toglolps
wjth white supremacisljdeologiesin
Missouriprior
lo their
in
tamous
aclions.The
additlonal dangerposed
by
those
in-
spired byleaderless resistanceis therisk olfudher
radicali_
zatjon. Asstrangeasilmaysound,departingiromestablishedradicalorganizalionscanleadtoaneven
grealer polarjzationof beliefs,
as thereis
no
group
toperiormthe role ofmoderaling views
or
policies.Remote,sparselypopulatedareas ofMissouri attractthose seeking isolation andprivacy,arguably
in-
cludingthosewho would usethatisoialion andprivacy
lor
theplanningandpreparation
ol
ione
woll
attacks.
lo
them.
According to
an
assessmeni
writtentor
the Depaftment ol Homeland
Seclrity,
'[tiheELF
JEarth
Liberalion Fronll websile
instucls
indrvid!als
who
areinteresled
in
joining
to avoid
existing cells,
eslab'
ijsh
their own cells, andproclaim
membershrp
rn
ELF
ailer allackingthe
property
01
an appropriate largel.Thisprocess
serves
to resisl inlillrallor
and atres1.
'o
The
Anima/ Liberation
Fronlhas
similarguidelines,allowing'anygroup
of
people
who arevegelarians
oIvegansandwhocatry
oul
actions accordingtoALFguideli;es
hav;
the
rigirt
to
regard
thems;lves asparl
of the ALF."1r
it is interesting
to
note
thal
a,though
Beam's
trealise onLeaderless Resistance calis
tor
the
iormation
olcells independent
01
any structuredparentgroup,in most,
if
not
all
cases,human nature
wilJ
interveneandaleader will emerge within
a
cell.
Without
fail,withjnanyextremisvsubversive organizalion,there
isa
core of ultra-extremistslinked by
several
lactors, themost imponant of whjch
is
the desire
and
need totake some sort ol
action.
lvlany times,
lhis
core
ol ultra-exiremists
is
not
known to
the
general
membership.
lnalmosi allcases however,
this smalicellis known 10'the
leadership
01
the
parentorganizatjonnotnecessarily becausetheysanction
the cells,
bul beca!se theyare a threat to the overallwell beingof theparent
Oroup
andpose
a
threat
to
iheallhority
and
leadership
oJ
the larger
group
A
number of other
1ac_
torsmay iniluence
the
viability
of
lnderground
ceJls:
The"BetterHaif"lactor has been
observedin
a
nunber
oi
cell
groups.
Individuaily, the
"leadership"
lacks eitherpsychologicaltraitsor technicalskill thalwouidprovidetheimpetus
Jor
the
celi to
take
action.
A complimentaryfigure
may
emergewhoprovidesthat companionship,psychologjcaltrait,skiil,
or
ambition
that makes the
two individuals
become
oneslrong entity,
and
the cell becones
capable and
more
active.
Sheerphysical
energy
andgenuinemilitaryprowess/experiencewill alsogela
unit.
lnmosl cases,these lalents are immediatelyrecognizedby oth-
ers
and
like it
or
not,
thatindivjduai
becomes a
deJactoleader, in some cases
an
objeci
of
worshjp
for
the
others.
With
these facisjnmind,
how doeslaw
enforcemenl detect,monilor,
and
disrupl theplanned
ac'
tiviliesof
a cell
group
or lone
woll?
Add a Comment