Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
National Press Release

National Press Release

Ratings: (0)|Views: 120 |Likes:
Published by Donald Boxley
We The People's Press Release
We The People's Press Release

More info:

Published by: Donald Boxley on Oct 22, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as ODG, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





- Major grassroots movement in 48 States, Constituting Common Law Grand Justunning six to three, 1992 Decision that went unnoticed, until now, Justice Antonin Scalia writing for t In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992, JusticeAntonin Scalia, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the junor legislative branches of government, but instead belongs to the people. It is in effect a fourth branc"governed" and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emBill of Rights, the acts of the Grand Jury is the consent of the people.“The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not beassigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It " 'is a constitutional f right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional governmkind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.-- Justice Antonin Scalia “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present "True Bills" of icourt, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently th"buffer" the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate-- Justice Antonin Scalia “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not prclear that, as a general matter at least, no such "supervisory" judicial authority exists. The "common laAmendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”-- Justice Antonin Scalia “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, irelationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm's length. Judges' direct ithe functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the graand administering their oaths of office. The grand jury's functional independence from the judicial branboth in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that po-- Justice Antonin Scalia “The grand jury 'can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because itthat it is not.' It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even "the precise nature of the offense" i The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor doerequire leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand juryoperates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates i-- Justice Antonin Scalia “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5
Amendment's constitutional guarantee presuppoan investigative body 'acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”-- Justice Antonin Scalia “Given the grand jury's operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surpbeen reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jurythe years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury's evidence-takihave refused them all. "it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution" to permito be challenged "on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand-- JusticeAntonin ScaliaNew York Supreme Court Judges v. The People - - - - SEE ATTACHED DOC
UUnniiiieeddNNeewwY YoorrkkCCoommmmoonnLLaawwGGrraannddJ Juurryy 
Psa 89:14 Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face.
Fax (888) 891-8977
October 15, 2013
 TObe distributed to “All” County Clerks, “All” Chief Court Clerks, “All” Administrative Judges, and, “All” District Executives. Without delay!FROM:Bronx, Columbia, Dutchess, Greene, Kings, Monroe, Nassau, New York, Niagara, OrPutnam, Queens, Rockland, Schenectady, Suffolk, Ulster, and Westchester CountieCommon Law Grand Juries.SUBJECT:Common Law Grand Juries and their unalienable right of consent.MESSAGE:On October 11, 2013 the Unified Grand Jury dispatched a small committee to fivecounties to test the access into the People’s courts and was to file the same day, indictments upclerks and judges if access was not achieved. Although access was not achieved due to extenuacircumstances the committee decided to call together the Grand Jury because it was observed bcommittee that the clerks were under a strong hold by the judges. The Grand Jury after hearingreport agreed and decided that to indict the court clerks would be unjust considering they wereelected or appointed and were acting under “orders” from judges and the threat of losing theiremployment. We also decided that the Elected County Clerks were not in a position to prevent othe people access into their buildings either.It is the intention of the Grand Jury to file indictments against Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge MichCoccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan, D Scheinkman if they fail to step aside byof the week.We ask that all the recipients of this memorandum read the attached letter in order that theyunderstand the “Constitutional Crisis” America is facing.ATTACHMENTS:Copy of letter sent to Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, JudgC. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan, D Scheinkman:
UUnniiiieeddNNeewwY YoorrkkCCoommmmoonnLLaawwGGrraannddJ Juurryy 
Psa 89:14 Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face.
Fax (888) 891-8977
October 15, 2013
 Judge A. Gail Prudenti Judge Michael V. Coccoma Judge C. Randall Hinrichs Judge Allan, D. Scheinkman..Dear Servants; The People of New York are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
. To secure theserights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the “CONSENT OGOVERNED”. Whenever any appointed or elected servant becomes destructive of these ends, itDuty (Right) of the Consentors (Grand Jury) to remove such servants and appoint or elect new sPrudence indeed dictates that presentments against elected and appointed servants should notcharged for light and transient causes; but, when a long train of abuses and usurpations finds thunder absolute Despotism, it is the right, it is the duty of the People (Grand Jury) to remove sucdisobedient servants and provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patiensufferance of the People of New York; and such is now it may be necessary to change the guard“True Bill”. To prove this, let the Facts be submitted to a candid world. Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge AllScheinkman have conspired to supplant the unalienable right of We the People to lawfullyassemble as consentors under a common cause to protect the unalienable rights of the Pof New York as constitutionallyprescribedand protectedunder the Fifth and other Amendments. Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge AllScheinkman have refused their Assent to the Law of the Land, the most wholesome, andnecessary for the public good. Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge AllScheinkman have blocked the Peoples’ access to take their rightful seat as Consentors. Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge AllScheinkman have opposed the rights of the People to consent or deny.
Declaration of Independence- We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowby their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->