Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Merton David Lopez, A091 085 417 (BIA Dec. 13, 2013)

Merton David Lopez, A091 085 417 (BIA Dec. 13, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 345|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of the respondent’s motion for continuance pending the adjudication of a Form I-130 that would allow him to apply for a waiver under Section 212(h) of the INA. The Board stated that immigration judge did not meaningfully consider the factors listed in Matter of Hashmi, 24 l&N Dec. 785 (BIA 2009), but rather observed that waivers under Section 212(h) of the INA are not typically granted for persons convicted of robbery and that the respondent may not merit favorable exercise of discretion. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of the respondent’s motion for continuance pending the adjudication of a Form I-130 that would allow him to apply for a waiver under Section 212(h) of the INA. The Board stated that immigration judge did not meaningfully consider the factors listed in Matter of Hashmi, 24 l&N Dec. 785 (BIA 2009), but rather observed that waivers under Section 212(h) of the INA are not typically granted for persons convicted of robbery and that the respondent may not merit favorable exercise of discretion. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Dec 26, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/09/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Eli A. chols, sq Socheat Chea PC.
   
Executive Oce r Immgraon Reiew
  
Ap O

h C
/    l  V 
OHC ice of hief osel -S 14 CCA Road 3500 Duuth Prk Lane Building 300 lth GA 0096 umpkn GA 1815 Ne: LPEZ MET DAVI A 091-085-417 Date o this notice: 12/132013
nclosed is a copy of he Boad' deso ad ode  he aboe-rerecd se. osre
 Mb: Py Rg
Seey,
D- c

Don Cr e ek
 
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Merton David Lopez, A091 085 417 (BIA Dec. 13, 2013)
 
PZ MR DAVD A091085417 146 CCA RAD UMPK GA 31815 Nae: PZ MRT AVID
   
ve e r mai ve
Bard  mmigrtn Aels Qce  he erk
5107 Lsburg Pike St 20 Fa Chch gn 3
OHC ffice of Chief Conel -SC 146 CCA Road
Lk
GA 31815 A 091-085-417 Date of thi notice 1213/203
nco   copy o te oad' in n e boven c Ti cpy  bn ovdd to yo a a cy Yo atoey o petave a bee eve t  on prn 
8
F § 12925()

 e deci er  y be movd om e Uie Se o arm a mmri Je dc orern a y be emov, ny peo  ve o  atace ion m be d  and eve by  appopit t o ppea n

ay o e e  t ecion 
 b Py g
Siney
c
a ar ie erk
Useram
_
Cite as: Merton David Lopez, A091 085 417 (BIA Dec. 13, 2013)
 
US eprtmet of Justice
Executive Oce r Imigraion Review Decision of te Board o mmigration Appeals Fas Church, Virina
0530
ie A09
l
085 417 Lmpkn, GA
Date I re: MERTON DAVID LOPEZ a.k.a. Marti David opez
OV PROCEEDS PPEL N BEHAF OF RESPONDENT: El
.
Echols, Esqire PPLICATON Cotiuance
DEC 1 3
20
he respodet, a naiv ad citize of Honduras, has apeaed om the Immigraton udges decisio aed Agst , 2013, deyig his reqes  a coninane o await adjudicaion of a mmediae reaive peitio (Fo 30 led by his Unied Staes citizen i The record wil be remanded r rther proeeigs. We review digs of ct, d
 e  eerminatio o redibiliy, made by the Immigraion Jdge unde a clearly eoeos" sdard 8 CR.
§
003
d)3i)210). We evew all ohe issues, icuding
sios o law ad ssues of isceio, ude a de novo sadard 8 CF.R
003((3)(i) As und b he Immgration udge, the responet has onvicions r obbery and the b taking r which he was setenced to a te of imprisonment o 6 years (.J. at 2 he respondens robbery oese is a ime ivolving moral trpitue tha would requie he respodent o obai a waiver of iamssibiliy der seion 2
2{h o e Immigatio and  Natioaliy Ac, 8 SC
§
82(h), o adjus staus though his ws peio, assumig it s vorabl addiaed Moreove, the oese of robber s a presmpivel a vioet ad dangerous crime ha would require the responen to meet a heighned stadad o demosratig extraordiy circumsances ha meri a vorable exercise o discretion.
S
8 C.FR
§
22.?(d). Pursan to o decisio i
M
of
H
 &N Dec. 785, 79092 BIA 209 (seing rth ctos to cosider i deeiig hehe good ause exiss r a oniuane o awa adjdcation of a peding vsa peii
),
I igaio Judges prim coseratio i deemg ether to gra a coace o awai addication o a peding 130 s he ikeihood ha the pettion will bd
�
 djusmen graned We indiaed i
H
that i order o mae this deeminon,  araio udge ma eed o exmine a wde ange of ctors coceing te mr te pplicato r adjustment, inludig amil ties and supporting documentation r ay ncessary waivers.

at 792. owever, he Immigraion udges decision onl coans an observatio ha a sectio 22) waiver is o orinarily grated r crmes sh as robber, ad he staemen tha he respodets applicaion r adjusen may ot mei a vorale exercise of dscreion based upon he covio docmes in the record (I a
3
uch p
tr pronouemens do not provide s wi  adeqae assurance tha due considerain w   ive to the responden's moo, partiulary

light o the Immigraion udges admisso o the record that he made ol a csor
Cite as: Merton David Lopez, A091 085 417 (BIA Dec. 13, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->