IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., a
Delaware corporation, and SIERRA
WIRELESS, INC., a Canadian corporation,
Defendants.
M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
CINTERION WIRELESS MODULES GMBH,
a German limited liability company,
CINTERION WIRELESS MODULES NAFTA
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENFORA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
NOV ATEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS,
INC., a Delaware corporation, and
NOV A TEL WIRELESS, INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
C.A. No. 12-030-RGA
C.A. No. 12-031-RGA
C.A. No. 12-032-RGA
Case l:l2-cv-00030-RGA Document ll3 Filed 0l/30/l4 Page l of 3 PagelD #: 3ll2
M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware
corporation, TELIT COMMUNICATIONS PLC,
a United Kingdom public limited company, and
TELIT WIRELESS SOLUTIONS INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
SIMCOM WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO.,
LTD., a Chinese limited company, SIM
TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD, a Bermuda
limited company, MICRON ELECTRONICS
L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company,
and KOWATEC CORPORATION, a California
corporation,
Defendants.
C.A. No. 12-033-RGA
C.A. No. 12-034-RGA
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
After having considered the submissions of the parties and hearing oral argument
on the matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that, as used in the
asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,094,010 ('"010 patent"):
1. The term "permitted caller" is construed to mean "a telephone number or IP
address on a list of numbers that are designated to cause the programmable
communicator to accept an incoming call received from that number."
2
Case l:l2-cv-00030-RGA Document ll3 Filed 0l/30/l4 Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 3ll3
...:; . -
2. The term "coded number" is construed to mean "a designated, unique sequence of
characters."
3. The term "a programmable interface" is construed to mean "an interface that is
able to be directly programmed."
4. The term "processing module" is construed to mean "components or units of a
computer program."
5. The term "monitoring device" is construed to mean "a device configured to
remotely monitor a programmable communicator device and/or a monitored
technical device."
6. The term "wireless communications circuit for communicating through an
antenna" is construed to mean "a complete wireless circuit that transmits and
receives data through an antenna."
7. The term "monitored technical device" is construed to mean "a device that
provides information to the remote monitoring device through the programmable
communicator device."
8. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, as used in claims 92 and 94, the term "a
programmable communicator device ... configured to be incorporated into the at
least one monitored technical device such that it becomes an integrated part of the
monitored technical device" should be construed to mean "a programmable
communicator device configured to be physically embedded within a monitored
technical device so as to form a single device."
SOORDEREDthisQdayof ,2014.
3
Case l:l2-cv-00030-RGA Document ll3 Filed 0l/30/l4 Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 3ll4