Knowing little about the mind-body connections, these so-called 'Leaders of Knowledge' havethe nerve to criticize a 'Holistic Homoeopathic Science' as unscientific, baseless and MYSTIC.Who is responsible for this 'plight' of Homoeopathy? None other than us, Homoeopaths. Wedon't practice the science as it should be - on 7 Cardinal principles. We don't follow thehomoeopathic parameters of improvement in a patient i.e. Generals, which are exactly theopposite of allopathic parameters. We are not interested in Hering's Law of Cure. We are tryingto please the statistician, of other sciences presenting statistics in their concept of diseases. Weare not taking risk of undertaking acute serious illnesses or terminal illnesses all on our own.We are not trying to establish scientific connections to our theory of similia-similibus curantur.In short, we are not trying to put our foot down and say with conviction -
"We areHomoeopaths and we beg to differ".
This book I have written, is an essay to produce 'conviction' in those homoeopaths who are notfortunate enough to get results in acute and serious cases. If the book and chart is followedstrictly, anybody can get results in such cases and that too with ideal
ONE DOSE.
Once theygrow in confidence I'm sure they shall all prescribe holistically both in Acute and Chronicillnesses and this, I am sure, shall ring the Death-knell for those hypocritic Homoeopathicleaders of multi-homoeopathic-patent fame.Finally, a word of advice dear friends, remember our homoeopathic motto--
AUDE SAPERE -Dare to be Wise
and act accordingly, since the future belongs only to Homoeopathy. Come on -let's grow together to welcome the
'Homoeopathic Millenium' - Year 2000 plus.Preface
Homoeopaths and Homoeopathy have taken a second seat for long. In the 'bus' of medicalsciences it is the only science with firm, UNALTERED principles and concrete philosophy as itsbase. None of the Homoeopathic principles or age-old, time-tested remedies have becomeobsolete. None of them has developed resistant strains to viruses or humans alike. They are aseffective in 'single dose' as they were 250 years ago when they were discovered. All thispersistency and 'consistency' of Homoeopathic drugs and their results is despite a drasticallychanging world scenario and having no research advances done by any multi-million-dollarmultinational companies! This, in itself, speaks volumes of the STABILITY and'SCIENTIFIC'ness of this science called
Homoeopathy!
The other medical sciences who callthemselves scientific sciences are busy redefining their 'principles' in the multi-million-dollarracket industries and laboratories which 'churn' out newer and newer versions of 'killer-drugs'(supposed to kill the bacteria and viruses, of course), only to be discarded as dangerous andineffective within a decade of its invention - so much for the 'scientific'ness!! These sciences are still struggling to find a drug which can 'cure' an allergy or a 'common cold'in the real sense of the term. Their superficial knowledge limits them to 'think' of a humanbeing as a conglomeration of 'spare parts'. Trying to treat in parts, calling themselves'specialists and super specialists', they are blissfully unaware of the
'dangerous connections'
.Knowing little about the mind-body connections, these so-called 'Leaders of Knowledge' havethe nerve to criticize a 'Holistic Homoeopathic Science' as unscientific, baseless and MYSTIC.Who is responsible for this 'plight' of Homoeopathy? None other than us, Homoeopaths. Wedon't practice the science as it should be- on 7 Cardinal principles. We don't follow thehomoeopathic parameters of improvement in a patient i.e. Generals, which are exactly theopposite of allopathic parameters. We are not interested in Hering's Law of Cure. We are tryingto please the statistician, of other sciences presenting statistics in their concept of diseases. Weare not taking risk of undertaking acute serious illnesses or terminal illnesses all on our own.We are not trying to establish scientific connections to our theory of similia-similibus curantur.In short, we are not trying to put our foot down and say with conviction -
"We areHomoeopaths and we beg to differ".
This book I have written, is an essay to produce 'conviction' in those homoeopaths who are notfortunate enough to get results in acute and serious cases. If the book and chart is followedstrictly, anybody can get results in such cases and that too with ideal
ONE DOSE.
Once theygrow in confidence I'm sure they shall all prescribe holistically both in Acute and Chronic
Leave a Comment