Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Complaint to the ACFEI Revised-2

Complaint to the ACFEI Revised-2

Ratings: (0)|Views: 185|Likes:
Published by mikekvolpe
Complaint by Chris Mackney of Dr. Stanton Samenow in Mackney's custody evaluation with his wife Dina Mackney. Dina Mackney's father is Pete Scamardo
Complaint by Chris Mackney of Dr. Stanton Samenow in Mackney's custody evaluation with his wife Dina Mackney. Dina Mackney's father is Pete Scamardo

More info:

Categories:Types, Legal forms
Published by: mikekvolpe on Feb 19, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





October 20, 2011  American College of Forensic Examiners International 2750 E Sunshine Springfield, MO 65804 Dear Ms. Sickman, I would like to file a formal complaint against Dr. Stanton Samenow and request an investigation into violations of the Ethical Principles of your organization for which he is a member. On January 23rd 2009, pursuant to §Virginia 20-124.2(D), Dr. Samenow was
appointed by the Honorable Leslie Alden “
to conduct a psychological evaluation and assessment of the parties and the minor children in order to make recommendations to the Court and the parties regarding what custodial arrangements would best suit the parties and the children
.”, as per the parties Pendente Lite Visitation Order (
Exhibit 1). Both the order and the Virginia Code specify that he was to perform a psychological evaluation. Dr. Samenow failed to conduct the proper evaluation. As I am sure your organization is aware a psychological evaluation is very different from a custody evaluation. Had a psychological evaluation been conducted as ordered, the
truth about the mother’s psychological condition would no longer be in question.
Dr. Samenows failure to conduct the proper evaluation is a violation of your organizations Principles;
Members are to be forever vigilant of the importance of their role and to conduct themselves only in the most ethical and professional manner at all times.
 In addition to c
onducting the wrong evaluation, Dr. Samenow’s report
misleading and did not ‘
serve justice by making an accurate determination of the facts involved.
 1. Dr. Samenow was made aware that I was being treated by a psychiatrist for the previous 4 years and was voluntarily on medication for depression related directly to the marriage and my employment with my ex-father in law. Dr. Samenow was given a signed release in order to speak with the psychiatrist Dr. Colleen Blanchfield (Exhibit 2), in order to confirm and verify allegations of emotional and physical abuse. Dr. Samenow was asked to verify the reasons for his treatment
and the Mother’s refusal to meet with Dr. Blanchfield
 and participate in the treatment. Dr. Samenow did not serve Justice by withholding the information provided to him regarding my treatment for depression and the reasons for the treatment. 2. Dr. Samenow was made aware of Domestic violence committed by the mother on me, on January 19
 2008, in the presence of the children and witnessed by Fairfax County Police. After custody had already been determined, Dr. Samenow admitted that he had been shown a shirt that the Mother had ripped from my body during the assault. Dr. Samenow left this
incident out of his report.
Dr. Samenow was also told how the mother’s father,
Pete Scamardo, tried to hide evidence of the mothe
r’s physical abuse when
he took the ripped shirt after the altercation.
also reported to Dr. Samenow a hole in the Mother’s bedroom wall, created
when the Mother threw a book in anger. Dr. Samenow could have verified this allegation during his home visit and reported accordingly. 3. Dr. Samenow left out of his report emotional abuse and manipulation of our son. On April 30
, 2009, my son repeated in front of Dr. Samenow that my ex-
wife had called me ‘a liar’ and that I “have all the money”.
I was concerned
about Dr. Samenow’s impartiality and emailed details of the incident
 (Exhibit 3) to my attorney and Dr. Samenow as a record. 4. Dr. Samenow did not accurately report the facts of the Traumatic Brain Injury of the mother 
 I informed Dr. Samenow
of the Mother’
s Traumatic Brain Injury, suffered from a cab accident, during the marriage, on January 1, 2003.
The Mother’s Brain Injury
 was specifically identified, as a source of conflict in marriage to Dr. Samenow in his office and in sworn testimony in 2004 (Exhibit 4; Exhibit 5).
Dr. Samenow was also specifically empowered by the Order to obtain ‘any
medical or mental health information
or documentation or releases’.
Samenow’s report does not indicate that any information was obtained from
Dr. Spector, Dr. Deborah Warden (a leading expert in TBI) or Dr. Cooney.
Dr. Samenow only refers to an ‘alleged head injury’ in his report
 (page 3). 5. Dr. Samenow was made aware of the concerns that I had about my father in law and the fact that I had discovered that he was, in fact, guilty of the murder he had denied all involvement for over 40 years and was concerned for my safety. Dr. Samenow does not accurately communicate my concerns for my
children’s character or my safety, as he was given numerous ‘acts of bad faith’, lying and manipula
tion: a. The Mother 
’s father admitted to trafficking heroin across the Mexican
border (Exhibit 6, 7, 8). b.
The Mother’s Father had his business partner murdered
 and was convicted of accomplice to murder.
 After exclaiming in Court “But, I didn’t
do it
. I didn’t”
, he was sentenced to Probation instead of the death penalty sought by the prosecutor. (Exhibit 9)  c. The Grandfather attempted to forge a polygraph examination (Exhibit 10)  d.
The Mother’
s father committed perjury (Exhibit 11)  e.
The Mother’s mother committed perjury (
Exhibit 12) f. The
Mother’s father has over 1
08 lawsuits in Fairfax County alone (Exhibit 13).
g. The Father in law had a $56 Million judgment against him in Maryland h. The Mother and her father conspired to circumvent Thoroughbred Racing Licensing laws, a class 4 felony (Exhibit 14). i. The Mother manipulated the
class mother, Kelly Malesardi, to remove me from
his daughter’s
 Class email list (Exhibit 15).  j. The Mother manipulated the
son’s Soccer 
‘team mother’
, Karla Brown, to not send information to the father (Exhibit 16). k. The mother lied under oath on May 13
, 2009, (Exhibit 17) during the time
of Dr. Samenow’s evaluation
that her parents were paying her legal fees. Her attorney's own legal bills prove that her father wrote 7 checks, totaling $72,643.95, from his Business account to pay legal fees prior to her statement on May 13th. Both of these issues were brought to Dr. Samenow's attention. l. The M
other’s father has a well known reputation for
bullying and abusive behavior throughout the real estate community. A witness and victim of
Pete Scamardo’s wrath and
abuse, John Sobecki, was not contacted by Dr. Samenow, as requested by the Father. Two other witnesses, Charles Kehler and Terry Hindermann, that could testify to my character and the abusive character of Pete Scamardo were not contacted by Dr. Samenow.
Dr. Samenow’s report
prejudicially refers to the felony accomplice to murder
conviction of the Mother’s father and his subsequent denials as
a ‘criminal conviction’
‘the situation 40 years ago’. The 
 glossed over and withheld from the Court by Dr. Samenow are extremely disturbing for the callousness, remorselessness and manipulation exhibited by Pete Scamardo. This is a pattern consistent with his reputation, well known in the business community, as reported to Dr. Samenow by the Father. In his report Dr. Samenow knowingly mischaracterizes the
Father’s legitimate “concern”
for the emotional welfare of
as being “obsessed”
(page 13 of his report). In addition to withholding material facts that reflect extremely poorly on the
mother, Dr. Samenow reports the mother’s statements and makes conclusions
, in his report, that evidence, witnesses and emails prove to be untrue. Here are examples of emails that prove that I was attempting to act in good faith and repeatedly offered to settle our differences out of Court and
completely contradict Dr. Samenow’s
conclusions. (Exhibit 18) 
Dr. Samenow also repeats the mother’s allegations that I was in communication
with a 17 year old girl and gave her a venereal disease without ever reporting my side of the story. I had communicated to Dr. Samenow that I had made my wife aware that I was communicating with other men and women who were also going through a similar experience. The person that my ex-wife claimed was a 17 year old girl was in fact a married 40+ year old woman, whom I had met publicly and even told my wife about. Her accusation that she was 17 or that I was in communication with her is baseless, as I explained to Dr. Samenow. Furthermore, I informed Dr. Samenow when my wife accused me of giving her a venereal disease, I vehemently denied it and even offered to

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->