Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Desierto
Facts:
o February 5, 2001: Estrada files a petition for prohibition with a prayer for a
writ or preliminary injunction to enjoin Ombudsman Desierto from continuing
the probe on the criminal cases filed against him (OMB Case No. 0-00-1629,
1754-1758), supposedly until his term as President is over.
o February 6, 2001: Estrada files another petition, this time a quo warranto
petition, against Arroyo. He wanted to be confirmed as the “lawful and
incumbent President of the Republic of the Philippines” and Arroyo only as
temporary / acting president until he is able to resume his duties.
o February 24, 2001: Respondents file their replies to Estrada’s consolidated
petitions.
1. Petitioner’s Arguments:
• He has not resigned as President yet, and so Arroyo’s presidency
was void since the position was not vacant at the time she was
sworn in.
• He is only temporarily unable to fulfill his duties as President, and
that he is merely on leave.
• Given the above arguments, Estrada is still President, especially
since he was never impeached, and he thus enjoys Presidential
Immunity from all kinds of suit.
• The Ombudsman has to stop the investigation since he had
already developed a bias against him (Estrada) from the
“barrage of prejudicial publicity on his guilt.”
2. Respondents’ Argument:
• The cases pose a political question (“ ‘the legitimacy of the
Arroyo administration’ ”) and are therefore out of the Court’s
jurisdiction, especially since Arroyo became president through
people power, and has already been recognized as such by other
governments. They compare the present case with Aquino’s
“revolutionary government” (Lawyers League for a Better
Philippines v. Aquino).
Issue:
Whether or not Estrada is merely a President on leave, which makes Arroyo just an
Acting President. (Whether Estrada resigned from his position)
Held:
Estrada resigned from his position. There are two elements that must be present to
consider someone to have resigned: first, the intent to resign, and second, the act/s of
relinquishment. Both elements were evident in Estrada’s actuations before he left
Malacañang, and so he must be considered to have resigned.
o Using the Totality Test (i.e., the totality of prior, contemporaneous and
posterior facts and circumstantial evidence bearing material relevance on
the issue), the Court found that Estrada’s acts to be tantamount to his
resignation.
o For intent: the Court mainly used Angara’s Diary, “Final Days of Joseph
Ejercito Estrada,” in order to intuit Estrada’s intent. The Diary, which was
published in a major publication, described Estrada’s acts following the
massive withdrawal of support by former Estrada allies. Here, Estrada is
quoted to have proposed a snap election of which he would not be a part.
He was also shown to have conceded to the idea that he had to resign.