Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
Appendix
Submission checklist......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
Submission
This guide takes you through the submissions process for the Professional Experience Route to membership, which requires you to submit written evidence to demonstrate your level of competence. Before completing the submission you will have paid an assessment fee that covers this process and a nal assessment. The nal assessment includes an interview. This is only open to those who meet all the requirements indicated in this guide in addition to meeting the required competence standards. It is important that your submission provides an accurate representation of your capabilities as these will be fully tested and cross-referenced in a face-to-face nal assessment interview that ultimately determines whether you have met the competence requirements.
Approach to take
The summary of experience allows you to show how you have developed depth of knowledge and practical ability throughout your career. The contents of your summary of experience will be drawn from your education/training and your work on a number of projects. The case study will allow you to demonstrate your competence from another approach. The focus of a case study is on one specic project. The project you choose should allow you to demonstrate a range of technical and mandatory competencies, and how you used the competency skills to achieve a successful outcome
Overview
You must provide the following written evidence: summary of experience against required competencies for your chosen pathway case study organisation chart. CPD record Once you have submitted your evidence, an assessor will decide whether you have demonstrated your competence sufciently to be able to progress to the nal assessment stage.
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
Summary of experience
For your summary of experience, you must write a brief statement about each of your technical and mandatory competencies. It is important to ensure you have a copy of the pathway guide for your chosen pathway with you when you are completing this stage. The guide gives denitions of the competencies, with practical examples of relevant tasks. In your summary of experience you will explain how your education, training and experience show that you have achieved each competency, using examples from your career. Once you have completed the statements you should review them as a whole: together, they form your summary of experience. In addition to showing your abilities in individual competencies, they should provide the assessors with an overview of your career, the work that you do and the levels you are working at. Your summary of experience should be between 2000 and 3000 words in total. RICS is not looking simply for evidence that you can do a relevant job (i.e. as a technical operative), but that you are operating at a level with considerable personal responsibility for decisions that have a signicant effect on clients (i.e. as a broad-based professional). You should demonstrate progression beyond what would normally be expected of a new graduate in a rst role. For example, with ve years professional experience you should be able to demonstrate that you are undertaking work that reects a broad range of the competencies for the pathway. With ten years experience, you may have progressed in a number of ways and could: be covering a broader range of projects and duties have moved up the management structure have become a specialist, focusing on one particular area but demonstrating considerably more expertise be covering the same work since your career started, but be working under less supervision and leading on some projects or accounts, or becoming involved in contributing to the work of another professional body. Your summary is expected to reect this.
The competencies are defined in three levels, from level 1 through to level 3. The following information will help you to understand what is required at each of those levels. If the competency you select is a level 3 competency, you should ensure you write the summary to level 3. You must include a brief statement for Level 1, (Knowledge and Understanding) and Level 2 (Practical Application). Level 3 competencies are the most important: they are crucial to demonstrating that you practise at a professional level. Follow the format outlined in the submission document.
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
The case study should focus on a single project or piece of work undertaken in the last 24 months where you played a leading role in terms of any or all of the following: strategy implementation management decision making problem solving client relationship management.
The content of your case study is more important than the style, but it should meet the standard of writing expected in a professional report prepared for a client. You should be condent that the case study demonstrates the following: your understanding of the competencies (core, optional, mandatory competencies) at least two technical competencies (core, optional competencies) a range of business and technical skills (mandatory competencies) the level of your responsibility
at least one example of personally giving reasoned advice to a client. While writing the case study you should be aware of what evidence you have already provided in your summary of experience and ensure that the level and scope of activities you are describing is consistent with what has been detailed in the summary. The assessor will look at the summary of experience and case study individually, but will also take a holistic view. Review all your written evidence together before you submit it, and make sure there are no gaps or contradictions.
Organisation chart
You must provide an organisation chart that clearly shows your own position, and your place in the structure both of your immediate department and the organisation as a whole. Use the submission checklist (see appendix) before you submit your written evidence to ensure the submission meets the requirements.
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
Result
You will receive one of the following results at this stage of the assessment process. Ready for nal assessment Not ready for nal assessment
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
Mandatory competencies
The assessor will make a preliminary assessment of your mandatory (business) competencies, including ethics. You will not be prevented from going forward simply on the basis of these non-technical competencies. The assessor may, however, identify any that have not been covered, or where your evidence does not look particularly strong. This will help you work on these competencies before your nal interview in which any or all of them may be covered.
Practical application
If you have not provided evidence of sufciently broad and high-quality experience to demonstrate practical application of one or more technical competencies, the report will recommend that you gain further experience in this area.
Reasoned advice
If you have not provided evidence of giving reasoned advice to clients, for a level 3 technical competency, you will need to gain further experience in this area.
Appeal
You have the right to appeal against the assessors decision. The appeal procedure will be explained in the feedback report.
July 2013
rics.org/experience
Applicant Guide
Professional Experience Route
Checks for the case study: Context section completed (optional) Case study focuses on only one project or piece of work Project/work was undertaken in last 24 months Two technical competencies are demonstrated (minimum) One mandatory competency is demonstrated (minimum) Your level of responsibility is demonstrated One example of level 3 technical competence (reasoned advice) is demonstrated (minimum) Client condentially is upheld Technical and mandatory competencies covered are listed beneath the case study Word count is a maximum 2000 words
Checks for the summary of experience: Chosen technical competencies meet the requirements Mandatory competencies meet the requirements Competency name and reference number completed correctly Competency level correctly identied according to pathway requirements Summary demonstrates competence to the levels required Summary is closely linked with competency denitions and examples given in pathway guide For level 1, reference is made to education, qualications or training For level 2, reference is made to a range of projects and practical application of skills For level 3, examples are given of advice given to clients Client condentially is upheld Word count is between 2000 and 3000 words in total.
Checks for the CPD record: 20 hours recorded for previous 12 months (minimum) Activities cover a broad range of competencies
Checks for all submissions: Accurate spelling, punctuation and grammar Writing style is professional
July 2013
rics.org/experience
rics.org
RICS HQ Parliament Square London SW1P 3AD United Kingdom Worldwide media enquiries: e pressofce@rics.org Contact Centre: e contactrics@rics.org t +44 (0)24 7686 8555 f +44 (0)20 7334 3811
Advancing standards in land, property and construction. RICS is the worlds leading qualication when it comes to professional standards in land, property and construction. In a world where more and more people, governments, banks and commercial organisations demand greater certainty of professional standards and ethics, attaining RICS status is the recognised mark of property professionalism. Over 100 000 property professionals working in the major established and emerging economies of the world have already recognised the importance of securing RICS status by becoming members. RICS is an independent professional body originally established in the UK by Royal Charter. Since 1868, RICS has been committed to setting and upholding the highest standards of excellence and integrity providing impartial, authoritative advice on key issues affecting businesses and society. RICS is a regulator of both its individual members and rms enabling it to maintain the highest standards and providing the basis for unparalleled client condence in the sector. RICS has a worldwide network. For further information simply contact the relevant RICS ofce or our Contact Centre.
Europe (excluding United Kingdom and Ireland)
Rue Ducale 67 1000 Brussels Belgium t +32 2 733 10 19 f +32 2 742 97 48 ricseurope@rics.org
Asia
Room 2203 Hopewell Centre 183 Queens Road East Wanchai Hong Kong t +852 2537 7117 f +852 2537 2756 ricsasia@rics.org
Americas
One Grand Central Place 60 East 42nd Street Suite 2810 New York 10165 2811 USA t +1 212 847 7400 f +1 212 847 7401 ricsamericas@rics.org
Africa
POBox 3400 Witkoppen 2068 South Africa t +27 11 467 2857 f +27 86 514 0655 ricsafrica@rics.org
United Kingdom
Parliament Square London SW1P 3AD United Kingdom t +44 (0)870 333 1600 f +44 (0)207 334 3811 contactrics@rics.org
Ireland
38 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland t +353 1 644 5500 f +353 1 661 1797 ricsireland@rics.org
Oceania
Suite 2, Level 16 1 Castlereagh Street Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia t +61 2 9216 2333 f +61 2 9232 5591 info@rics.org.au
Middle East
Ofce G14, Block 3 Knowledge Village Dubai United Arab Emirates t +971 4 375 3074 f +971 4 427 2498 ricsmenea@rics.org
India
48 & 49 Centrum Plaza Sector Road Sector 53, Gurgaon 122002 India t +91 124 459 5400 f +91 124 459 5402 ricsindia@rics.org