UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT O F NEW Y O R K X MARCUS ISAIAH WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, : :

-againstW I L L I A M MORRIS ENDEAVOR E N T E R T A I N M E N T , L L C , fon-nerly known as the W I L L I A M MORRIS AGENCY, INC., JEFF M E A D E and S A R A H WINIARSKI, Defendants. X

: : :

C m l Action N o . 10 Civ. 9647 (PKC) (JCF)

E M E R G E N C Y M O T I O N T O D I S Q U A L I F Y P. K E V I N C A S T E L AND J A M E S C . F R A N C I S DUE T O A C T U A L AND/OR AN " A P P E A R A N C E " O F R A C I A L BIAS. P R E J U D I C E AND I M P R O P R I E T Y IN V I O L A T I O N O F 28 U.S.C. S 455. OR IN T H E ALTERNATFV^E. E M E R G E N C Y MOTION F O R D I S C I P L I N A R Y SANCTIONS. INCLUDING D E F A U L T J U D G M E N T AND $250 M I L L I O N IN M O N T E A R Y SANCTIONS. AGAINST W I L L I A M M O R R I S E N D E A V O R E N T E R E T A I N M E N T . L Q E B & L O E B L L P . M I C H A E L P. Z W E I G . C H R I S T I A N C A R B O N E AND M I C H A E L HARNETT DUE T O "FRAUD UPON T H E C O U R T . " O R A L H E A R I N G DEMANDED.

Marcus Isaiah Washington 54 Boerum St., Apt. 6 M Brooklyn, N Y 11206 (646) 504-6497 humanrights. areamust@gmai 1. com Pro Se Litigant

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION E T H I C A L RESPONSmiLITIES OF A R T I C L E I I I FEDERAL JUDGES A N D CASE L A W O N DISQUALICATION [Ethical Responsibilities of Federal Judges] [Disqualification Case Law] [Aj-ticle I I I Federal Judges and the Constitution] P R O C E D U R A L SUMMAJIY OF W A S H I N G T O N BEFORE S.D.N.Y. A N D SECOND CIRCUIT PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF W A S H I N G T O N BEFORE THE A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N ASSOCIATION A N D M I C H A E L P. ZWEIG A N D LOEB & LOEB LLP'S "PATTERN" OF H I G H L Y
U N E T H I C A L A N D C R ; I M I N A L C O N D U C T O N B E H A L F O F W I L L L \ MORRIS xv

4 4 6 7 xii

[Prior Allegations o f Unethical and Criminal Conduct Against William M o m s , Loeb & Loeb LLP and Michael P. Zweig] xv

[Unethical and Criminal Conduct o f William Moixis, Loeb & Loeb L L P , Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone and Others Before the American Arbitration Association] xvii

[Loeb & Loeb LLP Seek Gregory's Disqualification After He Issues "Award." A A A Ignores the F A A , As Well As Their Own Rules, to Grant Loeb's Request.] xxvii

[Was Gregoiy's Removal by the A.A.A "Procedurally Improper"? Is Gregory's "Partial Final Award" "Final" for the Sake o f Judicial Review?] S H O R T C O M I N G S OF A R B I T R A T O R D A V I D L, GREOGRY A N D THE A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N ASSOCIATION: A R B I T R A T I O N WAS N E V E R A N APPROPRIATE F O R U M FOR THIS P A R T I C U L A R CASE [Shortcomings o f David L . Gregory and His December 17, 2013 "Partial Final Award"] [Decision on Arbitrability] [Pattern and Practice and Disparate Impact] [Pre-Hiring Individual Disparate Treatment] [Antitrust and Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights] [Defamation] [Relief] [Conclusion] [Shortcomings o f A A A and Arbitration in General [ A A A ' s Inability and/or Refusal to Punish Attorneys For Unethical Conduct] [Conflicts o f Interest] [The A A A and Its Staff Are Aiding and Abetting in Fraud] xxxvii 34 xxxviii 37 xli xliii 45 46 48 49 49 53 53 27

-11-

[The Public Policy Goals o f the Civil Rights Act o f 1964 O f Ending Workplace Discrimination in America Cannot Be Effectuated in Arbitration Because "Final" Arbitral Awards Are Unable to Set Precedent] [Arbitrator Gregoiy's "Partial Final Award" Should Be Confirmed in Part and Vacated in Part to Support that Castel's July 20, 2011 Stay Order Is Enoneous As a Matter o f Law and Public Policy and Therefore Should Be Vacated.] ["Manifest disregard o f the applicable law"] [Conclusion] A R G U M E N T S I N SUPPORT OF P. K E V I N CASTEL A N D LAMES C. FRANCIS' DISQUALIFICATION [Introduction] [Highlighting Some o f Enws o f Castel's July 20, 2011 Stay Order] [Castel's Distorted Summary o f Washington] [Castel's Manifest Disregard o f Federal, State and Local Antidiscrimination Law] [Even I f 2009 Arbitration Agreement Was the "Governing" Agreement, Both Contracts Were Unconscionable] [Castel's Numerous Violations Under the Judicial Code o f Conduct] [Erroneous Decisions o f S.D.N.Y. and Second Circuit Reflect Republican's Conservative Effort to Reshape the Judiciary and Larger Conspiracy by White Federal Judges To Eviscerate Many o f the Gains Made During Civil Rights Movement.] [Ronald Reagan] [George H . W. Bush] [George W. Bush] [Studies on Political Party of Appointing President & Judge's Judicial Opinions] 71 71 72 73 73 67 68 62 62 62 62 63 60 60 61 55

[Is Judicial Independence & Impartiality Possible In Cases Challenging Institutional Racism Under These Circumstances?] [Demonstrating How Decisions o f S.D.N.Y. and Second Circuit Were Narrowly Constiued] [Conclusion] [Addressing James C. Francis' Actual and/or Appearance o f Bias, Prejudice and Impropriety] [Previous Attempts Made To Have Castel and Francis Disqualified & Impeached] [Castel Refusal to Provide Notarized Copy of Appointment Affidavit] A R G U M E N T S SUPPORTING T H A T W I L L I A M MORRIS, M I C A H E L P. ZWEIG, CHRISTIAN CARBONE A N D LOEB & LOEB LLP H A V E I N T E N T I O N A L L Y ENGAGED I N " F R A U D UPON THE COURT" TO PREVENT JURY T R I A L [Introduction] [Fraud Upon the Court] -iii82 82 82 74 77 78 79 81 81

[Violation of New York Rules o f Professional Conduct and New York Judiciary Law 487] [Disciplinary and Monetary Sanctions for "Fraud Upon The Comt"] [Sanctions Should Be Granted Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 1] [Conclusion] PRAYERS FOR RELIEF [Irreparable Harm] [Prayers for Relief] [The Court's Inherent Powers] CONCLUSION

84 87 88 90 90 90 92 94 95