Nanotech Roadmap 2007 Main

2 0 0 7
Productive
Nanosystems
A Technology Roadmap
Sponsored by
All Rights Reserved
Copyright© 2007 Battelle Memorial Institute and Foresight Nanotech Institute. Permission is
granted to copy and distribute this work, provided that the work is unaltered and not a part of a
derivative work, this notice appears on all copies, copies are not used or distributed in any way
that implies an endorsement by Battelle Memorial Institute or Foresight Nanotech Institute or
any product or service not provided by Battelle or Foresight, and the copies themselves are not
sold or offered for sale. All other use, including creating derivative works, requires written
permission from Battelle Memorial Institute or the Foresight Nanotech Institute.
Notice for Content Prepared by Staff Employed at DOE National Laboratories
This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No.DE-AC05-
00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy, by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC under
Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Battelle Science
Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 and Battelle Memorial Institute DE-
AC05-76RL01830 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains
and the publisher, by accepting this article for publication, acknowledges that the United States
Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or
reproduce the published for of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States
Government purposes.
Roadmap Participants
Steering Committee
Paul Alivisatos, University of California at Berkeley
Pearl Chin, Foresight Nanotech Institute
K. Eric Drexler, Nanorex
Mauro Ferrari, University of Texas–Houston, Institute of Molecular Medicine
Doon Gibbs, Brookhaven National Laboratory
William Goddard III, Beckman Institute, California Institute of Technology
William Haseltine, William A. Haseltine Foundation for Medical Sciences and the Arts
Steve Jurvetson, Draper Fisher Jurvetson
Alex Kawczak, Battelle Memorial Institute
Charles Lieber, Harvard University
Christine Peterson, Foresight Nanotech Institute
John Randall, Zyvex Labs
James Roberto, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Nadrian Seeman, New York University
Rick Snyder, Ardesta
J. Fraser Stoddart, University of California at Los Angeles
Ted Waitt, Waitt Family Foundation
Technical Leadership Team

K. Eric Drexler, Nanorex; Alex Kawczak, Battelle Memorial Institute;
Project Management Team

Alex Kawczak, Battelle Memorial Institute; K. Eric Drexler, Nanorex; John Randall, Zyvex
Labs; Pearl Chin, Foresight Nanotech Institute; Jim Von Ehr, Zyvex Labs
Editors
K. Eric Drexler, Nanorex; John Randall, Zyvex Labs; Stephanie Corchnoy, Synchrona;
Alex Kawczak, Battelle Memorial Institute; Michael L. Steve, Battelle Memorial Institute
Contributing Editors
Jeffrey Soreff, IBM; Damian G. Allis, Syracuse University; Jim Von Ehr, Zyvex Labs
Front Cover Design

Katharine Green, Zyvex Labs
Nanotechnology Roadmap Participants i

Workshop and Working Group Participants
Radoslav R. Adzic*, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Damian G. Allis*, Syracuse University
Ingemar André, University of Washington
Tom Autrey*, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Don Baer*, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Sandra Bishnoi*, Illinois Institute of Technology
Brett Bosley, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Joe Bozell, University of Tennessee
Philip Britt, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Paul Burrows*, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
David Cardamone*, Simon Frazer University
Ashok Choudhury, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Stephanie Corchnoy*, Synchrona
James Davenport*, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Robert J. Davis*, The Ohio State University
Shawn Decker, South Dakota School of Mines
Mitch Doktycz*, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Eric Drexler*, Nanorex
Joel D. Elhard*, Battelle Memorial Institute
Jillian Elliot, Foresight Nanotech Institute
Doug English*, University of Maryland
Leo S. Fifield*, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Keith Firman*, University of Portsmouth
David Forrest*, Naval Surface Warfare Center
Glen E. Fryxell*, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Dan Gaspar*, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
David Geohegan*, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Anita Goel, Nanobiosym
J. Storrs Hall*, Engineering Research Institute, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing
Alex Harris, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Amy Heintz*, Battelle Memorial Institute
Evelyn Hirt, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Linda Horton, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Ed Hunter*, Sun Microsystems
Ilia Ivanov*, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Neil Jacobstein*, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing
Evan Jones, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Richard Jones, University of Sheffield
* Provided material for inclusion in this Nanotechnology Roadmap.
ii Participants Nanotechnology Roadmap

Workshop and Working Group Participants, Continued
John Karanicolas*, University of Washington
Alex Kawczak*, Battelle Memorial Institute
David Keenan, Nanoscience Technologies
Peter C. Kong*, Idaho National Laboratory
James Lewis*, Foresight Nanotech Institute
Alan Liby, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Khiang Wee Lim, Singapore Engineering Research Council
Eric Lund, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Russ Miller, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jim Misewich, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Scott Mize, Foresight Nanotech Institute
Lorrie-Ann Neiger, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Lee Oesterling*, Battelle Memorial Institute
Lori Peurrung, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
John Randall*, Zyvex Labs
Fernando Reboredo*, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Mark Reeves, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Steven M. Risser*, Battelle Memorial Institute
Sharon Robinson*, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Paul W. K. Rothemund*, California Institute of Technology
Jay Sayre*, Battelle Memorial Institute
Christian E. Schafmeister*, Temple University
Thomas Schulthess, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Nadrian Seeman*, New York University
Ida Shum, Idaho National Laboratory
Mark Simpson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Dennis Smith*, Clemson University
Vincent Soh, Singapore Engineering Research Council
Jeff Soreff*, IBM
Rob Tow, Sun Microsystems
Mike Thompson, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Bhima Vijayendran, Battelle Memorial Institute
Chiming Wei*, American Academy of Nanomedicine
Chia-Woan Wong, Singapore Engineering Research Council
Stan Wong*, Brookhaven National Laboratory
* Provided material for inclusion in this Nanotechnology Roadmap.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Participants iii

Sponsors and Hosts
Supported through grants to the Foresight Nanotech Institute by the

Waitt Family Foundation (founding sponsor) and Sun Microsystems,
with direct support from Nanorex, Zyvex Labs, and Synchrona.
Working group meetings hosted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
Brookhaven National Laboratory, and the Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory, in cooperation with Battelle Memorial Institute.
Notice
The views expressed in this document are the personal opinions and
projections of the individual authors as subject matter experts and do
not necessarily represent the views of their organizations of affiliation
or employment.
iv Participants Nanotechnology Roadmap

Executive Summary
Atomically precise technologies (APT) hold the potential to meet many

of the greatest global challenges, bringing revolutions in science, med-
icine, energy, and industry. This technology roadmap points the way for
strategic research initiatives to deliver on this promise.
Reasons why atomically
APT — An Essential Research Frontier
precise manufacturing
The long-term vision of all nanotechnologists has been the fabrication (APM) and atomically
of a wider range of materials and products with atomic precision. precise productive
However, experts in the field have had strong differences of opinion on nanosystems (APPNs)
how rapidly this will occur. It is uncontroversial that expanding the merit high priority:
scope of atomic precision will dramatically improve high-performance
technologies of all kinds, from medicine, sensors, and displays to • Atomic precision is the
materials and solar power. Holding to Moore’s law demands it, probably guiding vision for
nanotechnology.
in the next 15 years or less. • Limited atomically
precise fabrication
Atomically precise technologies are here today in diverse but restricted capabilities exist today.
forms: APT structures are found throughout materials science, and • Prototype scanning-
probe based APM
APT products are common in organic synthesis, scanning probe systems exist in the
manipulation, and biomolecular engineering. The challenge is to build laboratory and
on these achievements and expand them to produce a wider range of demonstrate AP
structures, providing APT systems of larger scale, greater complexity, operations on
semiconductor systems.
better materials, and increasingly higher performance. Progress in this • Nanoscale APPNs exist
area can be used to make advances in the area of APT fabrication, in nature and fabricate
which can be used to make further progress in other areas. Physics- uniquely complex AP
based modeling indicates that this path will lead to the emergence of nanostructures in
enormous quantities.
revolutionary capabilities in atomically precise manufacturing (APM). • Improved AP
technologies will enable
APM Will Launch an Industrial Revolution development of next-
generation APM
systems.
Atomically precise manufacturing processes use a controlled sequence • Next-generation APM
of operations to build structures with atomic precision. Scanning probe systems will enable
devices achieve this on crystal surfaces. Biomolecular machines achieve development of more
advanced AP
this in living systems. In both technology and nature, the components of technologies.
complex atomically precise systems are made using APM processes.
Recently identified approaches for using products of today's APM to

organize and exploit other functional nanoscale components show great
promise. Building on achievements in other areas of nanotechnology,
they point to capabilities that could prove transformative in multiple
fields, expanding the set of nanoscale building blocks and architectures
for products.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary v

Atomically precise productive nanosystems (APPNs) are nanoscale
APM systems that are themselves atomically precise. Biological APM
systems are all APPNs. As APM technologies are drawn upon to work
with a wider range of materials, APPNs will become applicable to wider
and wider ranges of products. This will lead to materials and devices of
Reasons why atomically unprecedented performance.
precise manufacturing
(APM) and atomically Robust physical scaling laws indicate that advanced systems of this type
precise productive can provide high productivity per unit mass, and requirements for input
nanosystems (APPNs) materials and energy should not be exceptional. These considerations
merit high priority and experience with the bio-based APPNs suggest that products
(continued): potentially can be made at low cost. With further development and
scale-up at the systems level, arrays of APPNs will be applicable to the
• Nanosystems in nature production of streams of components that can be assembled to form
demonstrate that macroscale systems. These characteristics of scale, cost, and
APPNs can produce performance point to far-reaching, disruptive change that spans
solar arrays, fuels,
complex molecules,
multiple industries.
and other products on
a scale of billions of No alternative to APPNs has been suggested that would combine
tons per year, at low atomically precise production of complex structures with the potential
cost, with low environ- for cost-effective scale-up. APT development leads toward unique
mental impact and
greenhouse-gas opportunities.
absorption.
• Arrays of artificial The Roadmap Workshops Opened
APPN modules
organized in factory- a Unique Window on the Potential of APT
style architectures will
enable fabrication of The Roadmap project provided a unique, cross-disciplinary process for
AP products on all
scales and from a wide exploring current capabilities and near-term opportunities in APT, and
range of synthetic explored pathways leading toward advanced APM. Our inaugural
materials: photovoltaic meeting, held in San Francisco, was followed by workshops at the Oak
cells, fuel cells, CPUs,
displays, sensors,
Ridge, Brookhaven, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories. These
therapeutic devices, meetings were unusual in the breadth of disciplines and research
smart materials, etc. experience brought by the participants. They were unique in their focus
• Across a wide range of on integrating knowledge applicable to the development of APT and
devices and systems,
pursuing the ultimate APM.
in high performance
drives toward atomic Workshop participants gained new perspectives and directions for their
precision, as only research. The body of this Roadmap document brings together threads
atomic precision can
enable optimal
from the meetings and subsequent exchanges, pointing to research
structures. directions that promise remarkable rewards.
APM Products Will Have Broad and Growing Applications

Potential products of APM are applicable to familiar nanotechnology
objectives in energy production, health care, computation, materials,
instrumentation, and chemical processing. These include:
vi Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap
• Precisely targeted agents for cancer therapy
• Efficient solar photovoltaic cells
• Efficient, high-power-density fuel cells
• Single molecule and single electron sensors
• Biomedical sensors (in vitro and in vivo)
• High-density computer memory
• Molecular-scale computer circuits
• Selectively permeable membranes
• Highly selective catalysts
• Display and lighting systems
• Responsive (“smart”) materials
• Ultra-high-performance materials
• Nanosystems for APM.
The most attractive early applications of APM are those that can yield
large payoffs from small quantities of relatively simple AP structures.
These applications include sensors, computer devices, catalysts, and
therapeutic agents. Many other applications, such as materials and
energy production systems, present greater challenges of product cost
or complexity. There is likewise a spectrum of challenges in required
materials properties and durability in application environments. Early
niche applications can provide momentum and market revenue, and we
anticipate that ongoing improvements in product performance,
complexity, and cost will ultimately enable the full spectrum of
applications outlined in the Roadmap, as well as applications yet to be
imagined.
Call to Action for APT Advancement

This Roadmap is a call to action that provides a vision for atomically
precise manufacturing technologies and productive nanosystems. The
United States nanotechnology advancement goal should be to lead the
world towards the development of these revolutionary technologies in
order to improve the human condition by addressing grand challenges
in energy, health care, and other fields. The United States can accom-
plish this goal through accelerated global collaborations focused on two
strategies that will offer ongoing and increasing benefits as the
technology base advances:
1. Develop atomically precise technologies that provide clean
energy supplies and a cost-effective energy infrastructure.
2. Develop atomically precise technologies that produce new
nanomedicines and multifunctional in vivo and in vitro
therapeutic and diagnostic devices to improve human health.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary vii

The vision expressed in this Roadmap is to use nanotechnology to
improve the human condition. We believe that the most cost-effective
way to do this is to develop atomically precise technologies and
productive nanosystems, which enable science, engineering, and
manufacturing at the nanoscale. To justify the investment, the long-
term development pathway must have intermediate milestones that
demonstrate real benefits.
Close cooperation between government, academia, and industry is

necessary to cover the spectrum from basic to application-oriented
research. To foster the necessary breakthroughs, participating
universities must develop advanced study programs that address
Atomically Precise productive nanosystems. Long-term and high-risk research will require
Technology (APT) investment by government and philanthropic sources, since industry
can seldom afford to invest in such research. However, an efficient
• Atomic precision is the approach to developing and commercializing technologies based on
guiding vision for productive nanosystems must foster competition, since market
nanotechnology. competition has repeatedly proven to be the most efficient way to
• Required for Moore's
law progress in 15 year
allocate the ever-scarce resources of talent, time, and money. In all
time frame. areas, we must measure our success by results, not by dollars spent.
• Required for optimal
materials and systems. Close cooperation among scientific and engineering disciplines will be
• Current forms have necessary because of the nature of the engineering problems involved.
sharply restricted
capabilities. This cross-disciplinary collaboration will bring broad benefits through
• Advances will enable the cross-fertilization of ideas, instruments, and techniques that will
expanding result from developing the required technology base.
applications.
• APT development
requires focused cross- With international cooperation, the benefits of productive nanosystems
disciplinary research to will be delivered to the world faster. Coordinating a full international
develop a body of effort is extremely desirable in order to minimize duplication of effort in
engineering knowledge smaller national programs conducted independently.
for systematic design
and improvement of
AP nanosystems. Recommendations
As a foundation for action, establish research objectives and

organizations that will be effective in developing APT systems.
• Develop a broad technology base for APT and apply this to

develop improved APM, APPNs, and spinoff APT
applications. Use atomic precision as a merit criterion for
general research in nanofabrication. For research directed
toward APM and APPNs, treat atomic precision as an
essential criterion.
• Build partnerships among research institutions to coordinate
the development of complex, atomically precise
viii Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

nanosystems. Complement scientific exploration of novel
phenomena with engineering approaches that exploit and
integrate components that exhibit more predictable
behavior.
• Promote collaboration aimed at satisfying the multiple
requirements for building next-generation systems. The
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors
illustrates this vital role, coordinating diverse groups to
develop the comprehensive sets of tools needed to fully
enable next-generation technologies.
Support work on modeling and design software that facilitates AP

Atomically Precise
nanosystem development. Manufacturing (APM)
• Prioritize modeling and design software as critical elements • Essential feature:

in the development and exploitation of APM, APPNs, and programmable control
spinoff APT applications. of operations.
• Required for engineer-
• Support ongoing research in multi-scale modeling to ing and fabricating
describe physical phenomena in large systems at different complex AP systems.
levels of theory and resolution. Focus this research on • Scanning probe devices:
APM on metals,
requirements needed to support computer-aided design semiconductors.
software for AP nanosystems. • Biomolecular
machines: APM of
• Develop software that addresses domain-specific problems of polymer objects.
modeling and design in diverse classes of AP nanosystems, • Self-assembly: large AP
including structures made by tip-directed APM and by the products from smaller
ones.
folding and AP self-assembly of nanoscale polymeric objects. • Near-term APM
• Develop compilations of data organized to support design promises a growing
range of applications.
and implementation of APT systems. Classify materials, • Advanced APM
building blocks, devices, and processes, enabling search promises revolutionary
according to criteria and metrics that describe their applications.
functional characteristics. These compilations will cut across
the disciplinary barriers that now impede the flow of
practical knowledge.
Develop tools and processes to support tip-directed APM.
• Develop stable, reproducible, atomically precise scanning

tunneling microscope tips.
• Develop tool tips that capture and transfer atoms, molecules,
or other building blocks in known configurations; tool tips
able to sense building-block capture and release.
• Develop closed-loop nanopositioning systems with
resolution < 0.1 nm and three or more degrees of freedom;
Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary ix
develop small-footprint systems to implement array-based
parallelism
• Improve atomic layer epitaxy and atomic layer deposition.
• Seek means for highly selective depassivation and etching of
surfaces and for atomically precise functionalization.
Atomically Precise • Seek means for direct placement and bonding of atoms and
Productive Nanosystems molecules and for atomically precise defect inspection,
(APPNs) repair.
• Develop robust protection layers to preserve the atomic
• Essential feature: APM
processes implemented precision of APM products.
by APFNs.
• Bio-APPNs are the Expand and exploit sets of building blocks for
central fabrication
systems in living cells. AP self- and tip-directed assembly.
− Used in biotech for
bulk production: 1010 • Explore and catalog diverse sources of AP components:
to >>1020 units.
− Can now design and natural and synthetic molecules, AP nanoparticles, DNA and
make 3D, 107-atom protein objects, products of tip-directed APM.
biopolymer objects.
• Advanced-generation • Expand the set of atomically precise building blocks for both
APPNs provide a road AP self assembly and tip-directed methods.
forward.
− Bootstrap the • Develop monomeric building blocks for ribosome-like
capabilities of next- synthesis of AP polymer sequences with subsequent folding,
gen APPNs. binding, and cross-linking to form AP polymeric objects by
− Expand range of
materials: ceramics, self-assembly.
semiconductors,
metals.
• Develop prototype APPNs that perform ribosome-like
− Increase performance synthesis of AP polymer sequences.
of components for
APFNs • Make atomic precision a criterion for APT-relevant self-
− Robust scaling laws assembly research.
predict high
throughput per unit • Make systematic design methodologies a merit criterion for
mass. research in AP self-assembly.
− APPN arrays enable
macroscale products
from nano parts. Support the development of modular molecular
composite nanosystems (MMCNs).
• Extend and exploit the recent development of configurable,

3D, million-atom-scale DNA frameworks with dense arrays
of distinct, addressable, AP binding sites.
• Extend and exploit the capability of protein engineering to
produce functional, relatively rigid AP polymer objects.
• Expand capabilities for engineering proteins with AP binding
to DNA frameworks and functional components.
x Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

• Develop systematic methodologies for building MMCNs in
which proteins bind specific functional components to
specific sites on DNA structural frameworks.
• Support theoretical and experimental research to develop
and exploit the ability to organize large numbers of distinct,
functional nanostructures in 3D patterns on a 100 nm scale.
• Develop means to interface MMCNs with nanostructured
substrates patterned by tip-directed AP fabrication and by
non-AP nanolithography.
• Pursue synthetic biology approaches for bringing the cost of
DNA into line with the cost of proteins and other Some Enabling
biopolymers. Technologies
Explore objectives for system development. • Structural DNA

nanotechnology
• Scanning probe
• Extend and exploit methodologies for using modeling and manipulation
design to specify APT systems well enough to indicate the • Protein design
requirements for their implementation. • Macromolecular
self assembly
• Use these methodologies to identify research objectives that • Nanoparticle
can reasonably be anticipated to have high payoff. synthesis
• Nanolithography
• Develop objectives and requirements for implementing high- • Organic synthesis
payoff APT systems, including both APT applications and • Biotechnology and
molecular biology
next-generation APM and APPN technologies that will • Surface science
expand the range of APT applications. • Molecular imaging
and characteri-
zation
Looking Forward • Quantum
chemistry
This initial roadmap explores a small part of a vast territory, yet even • Molecular
this limited exploration reveals rich and fertile lands. Deeper integration dynamics
• Computer-aided
of knowledge already held in journals, databases, and human minds can molecular
produce a better map, and doing so should be a high priority. Some engineering
research paths lead toward ordinary applications, but other paths lead
toward strategic objectives that are broadly enabling, objectives that can
open many paths and create new fields. These paths are the focus of this
roadmap. They demand further exploration.
Looking forward, we see both incremental payoffs and grand challenges

that can be achieved through a chain of strategic objectives. Advancing
from exploration, to pioneering, to full exploitation will require a great
effort, but this will be a natural progression. Great rewards are already
visible. They merit a commensurate investment.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary xi

Technology Development and Applications Overview
Development Area Horizon I
• Bio-based productive nanosystems

(ribosomes, DNA polymerases)
• Atomically precise molecular self-
Atomically Precise assembly
Fabrication and
• Tip-directed (STM, AFM) surface
Synthesis Methods modification
• Advanced organic and inorganic
synthesis
• Biomolecules (DNA- and protein-

based objects)
Atomically Precise • Surface structures formed by tip-
Components and directed operations
Subsystems • Structural and functional
nanoparticles, fibers, organic
molecules, etc.
• 3D DNA frameworks, 1000

addressable binding sites
Atomically Precise • Composite systems of the above,
Systems and patterned by DNA-binding protein
adapters
Frameworks
• Systems organized by tip-built
surface patterns
• Multifunctional biosensors
• Anti-viral, -cancer agents
• 5-nm-scale logic elements
Applications • Nano-enabled fuel cells and solar
photovoltaics,
• High-value nanomaterials
• Artificial productive nanosystems
xii Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

Horizon II Horizon III
• Artificial productive nanosystems • Scalable productive subsystems in

in solvents machine-phase environments
• Mechanically directed solution- • Machine-phase synthesis of exotic
phase synthesis structures
• Directed and conventional self- • Multi-scale assembly
assembly
• Single-product, high-throughput
• Crystal growth on tip-built surface molecular assembly lines
patterns
• Coupled-catalyst systems
• Composite structures of ceramics, • Nearly reversible spintronic logic

metals, and semiconductors
• Microscale 1 MW/cm3 engines and
• Tailored graphene, nanotube motors
structures
• Complex electro-mechanical
• Intricate, 10-nm scale functional subsystems
devices
• Adaptive supermaterials
• Casings, “circuit boards” to • Complex systems of advanced

support, link components components, micron to meter+
scale
• 100-nm scale, 1000-component
systems • 100 GHz, 1 GByte, 1 μm-scale,
sub-μW processors
• Molecular motors, actuators,
controllers • Ultra-light, super-strength,
fracture-tough structures
• Digital logic systems
• Artificial immune systems • Artificial organ systems

• Post-silicon extension of Moore’s • Exaflop laptop computers
Law growth
• Efficient, integrated, solar-based
• Petabit RAM fuel production
• Quantum-wire solar photovoltaics • Removal of greenhouse gases
• Next-generation productive from atmosphere
nanosystems • Manufacturing based on
productive nanosystems
Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary xiii

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
xiv Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

Table of Contents
Executive Summary................................................................................. v
Acronyms and Abbreviations................................................................ xix
Part 1—The Road Map
Introduction.............................................................................................. 1
Atomic Precision: What, Why, and How? .......................................... 4
Atomically Precise Manufacturing....................................................... 8
Atomically Precise Components and Systems ................................... 14
Modeling, Design, and Characterization ............................................ 17
Applications.............................................................................................. 22
Agenda for Research and Call to Action ............................................ 45
Part 2—Topics in Detail
Topic 1 Components and Devices ..................................................... 63
Topic 2 Systems and Frameworks ...................................................... 87
Topic 3 Fabrication and Synthesis Methods .................................... 113
Topic 4 Modeling, Design, and Characterization ........................... 151
Part 3—Working Group Proceedings

Atomically Precise Fabrication
01 Atomically Precise Manufacturing Processes .......................... 01-1
Nanotechnology Roadmap Contents xv

02 Mechanosynthesis .......................................................................... 02-1
Damian G. Allis, Syracuse University
03 Patterned ALE Path Phases .......................................................... 03-1
04 Numerically Controlled Molecular Epitaxy
(Atomically Precise 3D Printers) ................................................. 04-1
J. Storrs Hall, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing
05 Scanning Probe Diamondoid Mechanosynthesis..................... 05-1
David. R. Forrest,* Robert A. Freitas Jr.,** Neil Jacobstein**—
Important Note About *Naval Surface Warfare Center, **Institute for Molecular
Copyrights Engineering
06 Limitations of Bottom-Up Assembly ......................................... 06-1
Individual papers in the John Randall, Zyvex Labs
Working Group Proceed-
07 Nucleic Acid Engineering ............................................................ 07-1
ings are protected by James Lewis, Foresight Nanotech Institute
copyright as follows.
08 DNA as an Aid to Self-Assembly................................................. 08-1
Copyright © 2007 Battelle
James Lewis, Foresight Nanotech Institute
Memorial Institute: Papers 09 Self-Assembly ................................................................................. 09-1
09, 17, 26, 27, 28, 31, 33, Glen E. Fryxell, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
34, 35, 37, 39. 10 Protein Bioengineering Overview .............................................. 10-1
Sandra Bishnoi* and Doug English,** *Illinois Institute of
Copyright © 2007 Battelle Technology, **University of Maryland
Memorial Institute and
11 Synthetic Chemistry ...................................................................... 11-1
Foresight: Papers 01, 02,
Damian G. Allis, Syracuse University
03, 04,05, 06, 07, 08, 10,
11,12, 13, 14,15, 16, 18, 19, 12 A Path to a Second Generation Nanotechnology .................... 12-1
20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, Christian E. Schafmeister— University of Pittsburgh
30, 32, 36, 38. 13 Atomically Precise Ceramic Structures ..................................... 13-1
Peter C. Kong, Idaho National Laboratory
14 Enabling Nanoscience for Atomically-Precise Manufacturing
of Functional Nanomaterials........................................................ 14-1
D. B. Geohegan, A. A. Puretzky, and G. Eres,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Nanoscale Structures and Fabrication
15 Lithography and Applications of New Nanotechnology ........ 15-1
Robert J. Davis* and John Randall**, *The Ohio State
University, **Zyvex Labs
16 Scaling Up to Large Production of
Nanostructured Materials............................................................. 16-1
Sharon Robinson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
xvi Contents Nanotechnology Roadmap

17 Carbon Nanotubes ........................................................................ 17-1
Leo S. Fifield, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
18 Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes .............................................. 18-1
Stan Wong, Brookhaven National Laboratory
19 Oligomer with Cavity for Carbon Nanotube Separation ....... 19-1
Ingemar André, University of Washington
20 Nanoparticle Synthesis ................................................................. 20-1
Peter C. Kong, Idaho National Laboratory
21 Metal Oxide Nanoparticles .......................................................... 21-1
Stan Wong, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Motors and Movers
22 Biological Molecular Motors for Nanodevices ........................ 22-1
J. Youell and Keith Firman, University of Portsmouth
23 Molecular Motors, Actuators, and Mechanical Devices ......... 23-1
David. R. Forrest,* Robert A. Freitas Jr.,** Neil Jacobstein**—
*Naval Surface Warfare Center, **Institute for Molecular
Engineering
24 Chemotactic Machines ................................................................. 24-1
Paul Rothemund, California Institute of Technology
Design, Modeling, and Characterization
25 Atomistic Modeling of Nanoscale Systems ............................... 25-1
J. W. Davenport, Brookhaven National Laboratory
26 Productive Nanosystems: Multi-Scale
Modeling and Simulation.............................................................. 26-1
Joel D. Elhard, Battelle Memorial Institute
27 Thoughts on Prospects for New Characterization Tools........ 27-1
Dan Gaspar and Don Baer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
28 Characterization/Instrumentation Capabilities
for Nanostructured Materials....................................................... 28-1
Don Baer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Applications
29 Nanomedicine Roadmap: New Technology and
Clinical Applications...................................................................... 29-1
Chiming Wei, American Academy of Nanomedicine
30 Applications for Positionally Controlled Atomically
Precise Manufacturing Capability .............................................. 30-1
David. R. Forrest,* Robert A. Freitas Jr.,** Neil Jacobstein—
*Naval Surface Warfare Center, **Institute for Molecular
Engineering
Nanotechnology Roadmap Contents xvii
31 Piezoelectrics and Piezo Applications ....................................... 31-1
Leo S. Fifield, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
32 Fuel Cell Electrocatalysis: Challenges and Opportunities ..... 32-1
R. R. Adzic, Brookhaven National Laboratory
33 Atomic Precision Materials Development in PEM Fuel Cells 33-1
Jay Sayre, Battelle Memorial Institute
34 Hydrogen Storage .......................................................................... 34-1
Tom Autrey, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
35 The Potential of Atomically Precise Manufacturing
in Solid State Lighting.................................................................... 35-1
Paul Burrows, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
36 Towards Gaining Control of Nanoscale Components and
Organization of Organic Photovoltaic Cells.............................. 36-1
Ilia Ivanov and Fernando Reboredo, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
37 Impact of Atomically Precise Manufacturing on
Transparent Electrodes ................................................................. 37-1
Amy Heintz, Battelle Memorial Institute
38 Atomically Precise Fabrication for Photonics:
Waveguides, Microcavities ........................................................... 38-1
Lee Oesterling, Battelle Memorial Institute
39 Impact of Atomically Precise Manufacturing
on Waveguide Applications.......................................................... 39-1
Steven M. Risser, Battelle Memorial Institute
xviii Contents Nanotechnology Roadmap

Acronyms and Abbreviations
3DAP 3-D Atom Probe

AES Auger Electron Spectroscopy
AFM Atomic Force Microscopy
ALE Atomic Layer Epitaxy
AP Atomically Precise
APFN Atomically Precise Functional Nanosystem
APM Atomically Precise Manufacturing
APPN Atomically Precise Productive Nanosystem
APSA Atomically Precise Self Assembly
APT Atomically Precise Technology
CAD Computer Aided Design
CASSCF Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field
CBS Complete Basis Set
CC Coupled Cluster
CI Configuration Interaction
CNDO Complete Neglect of Differential Overlap
Cryo-EM Cryo-Electron Tomography
DCP Disc Centrifuge Photosedimentation
DLS Dynamic Laser Light Scattering
ESEM Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy
FIB Focused Ion Beam
FRAP Fluorescence Return After Photobleaching
FRET Fluorescence Resonant Energy Transfer
FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
GVB Generalized Valence Bond
HRTEM High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy
INDO Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap
LED Light Emitting Diode
MCSCF Multi-Configuration Self-Consistent Field
MEMS Micro Electro Mechanical System
MINDO Modified Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap
MMCN Modular Molecular Composite Nanosystem
MP Moeller-Plesset Perturbation Theory
MRCI Multi-Reference Configuration Interaction
MWNT Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube
NC-AFM Non-Contact Atomic Force Microscopy
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
NOPV Nanostructured Organic Photovoltaic
OLED Organic Light Emitting Device
PALS Phase Analysis Light Scattering
PCS Photon Correlation Spectroscopy
PEM Proton Exchange Membrane; Polymer Electrolyte Membrane
PIXE Proton Induced X-ray Emission
PN Productive Nanosystem; Obsolete form replaced by APPN
PPP Pariser-Parr-Pople
PV Photovoltaic
QMC Quantum Monte Carlo
RS Raman Spectroscopy
SAM Scanning Auger Microscopy
SAMMS™ Self-Assembled Monolayers on Mesoporous Supports
SANS Small Angle Neutron Scattering
SAXS Small Angle X-ray Scattering
Nanotechnology Roadmap Acronyms xix

SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy
SHeM Scanning Helium Ion Microscope
SNOM Scanning Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SPM Scanning Probe Microscopy
SSL Solid-State Lighting
SSNMR Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
STM Scanning Tunneling Microscopy,
SWNT Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube
TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy
TOF-SIMS Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
UV-vis Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy
XAFS X-ray Absorption Fine Structure
XPS X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
XRD X-ray Diffraction
xx Acronyms Nanotechnology Roadmap

Introduction
The two challenges Richard Feynman issued at the end of his classic
lecture in 1959, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” helped focus
interest on the possibility of manipulating and controlling things on a
very small scale. Since that time, researchers have increasingly turned
their attention to achieving atomically precise manufacturing (APM).
There are immense technical challenges in attaining complete control
of the structure of matter, and the development path is apt to be a long
one. However, even before the ultimate goal is achieved, APM is
expected to provide a wide array of practical and profitable technologies
and products as research and development in nanotechnology proceeds.
Leadership provided by Battelle and access to conference facilities at

three U.S. National Laboratories were instrumental in enabling
researchers from academia, government, and industry to map out
several paths that hold promise in developing the ability to construct
complex products with atomic precision. The workshop projects
brought together key stakeholders who have a role in developing the
next generations of nanotechnology, and gave them the opportunity to
coordinate their current thinking and future APM activities. The aim of
this first version of a nanotechnology roadmap is to provide a common
vocabulary and framework that scientists, engineers, managers, and
planners from many technical specialties can use for their own strategy,
investment, research and/or development processes. This Technology
Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems is a first attempt to map out the
R&D pathways across multiple disciplines to achieve atomically precise
manufacturing.
About the Roadmap Document

This Roadmap has three main parts. The first provides a broad,
integrated perspective on technologies and objectives in APT and APM,
together with a survey of applications and a policy-oriented call to
action.
The second, Topics in Detail, explores contributing technologies in

more depth, surveying current capabilities important to APT and APM
and discussing how they might be exploited to develop next-generation
capabilities and applications. It is here that we felt most acutely the
limits of our time and resources relative to breadth and depth of the
relevant knowledge. Important topics, major challenges and
opportunities, and promising lines of development are sometimes
represented as bullet points, or briefly highlighted in the discussion of a
broader subject. We believe this represents an opportunity to invite
Nanotechnology Roadmap Introduction 1

your participation in the development of a future version of this
roadmap.
Finally, the Working Group Proceedings presents a set of papers,

extended abstracts, and personal perspectives contributed by
participants in the Roadmap workshops and subsequent online
exchanges. These contributions are included with the Roadmap
document to make available, to the extent possible, the full range of
ideas and information brought to the Roadmap process by its
participants.
We hope that this initial exploration of paths forward will be followed

by further efforts, some more comprehensive, and others delving more
deeply into topics that will, in time, become fields in themselves.
There is no sharp and Battelle and Foresight Nanotech Institute would like to thank the Waitt
compelling line that Family Foundation and Sun Microsystems for financial support of the
defines the atomically project, and the many research participants for their technical
precise structures within knowledge and time in producing this “first cut” at an APM roadmap.
the scope of the TRPN. For
example, devices made About the Terminology in the Roadmap
with 10,000 atoms in a
specific, complex structure The initial meeting of the Steering Committee and follow-on
would be in scope, even if discussions produced the following definitions for key terms:
they have a few defects, yet ¾ Nanosystems are interacting nanoscale structures, components,
a flawless water molecule and devices.
would be out of scope.
Somewhere between these ¾ Functional nanosystems are nanosystems that process material,
is a gray area. Because energy, or information.
agreement on a sharp
¾ Atomically precise structures are structures that consist of a
definition would be
specific arrangement of atoms.
difficult and of little use,
we suggest that this ¾ Atomically precise technology (APT) is any technology that
question be set aside. exploits atomically precise structures of substantial complexity.
Rather than using scale,
complexity, and defect ¾ Atomically precise functional nanosystems (APFNs) are
density to define threshold functional nanosystems that incorporate one or more nanoscale
criteria, it will be more components that have atomically precise structures of substantial
productive to use them as complexity.
metrics for evaluating
¾ Atomically precise self-assembly (APSA) is any process in which
progress.
atomically precise structures align spontaneously and bind to form
an atomically precise structure of substantial complexity.
2 Introduction Nanotechnology Roadmap

¾ Atomically precise manufacturing (APM) is any manufacturing
technology that provides the capability to make atomically precise
structures, components, and devices under programmable control.
¾ Atomically precise productive nanosystems (APPNs) are

functional nanosystems that make atomically precise structures,
components, and devices under programmable control, that is, they
are advanced functional nanosystems that perform atomically
precise manufacturing.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Introduction 3

Atomic Precision: What, Why, and How?
Atomically precise structures consist of a definite arrangement of
atoms. Current examples include:
• Self-assembled DNA frameworks
• Engineered proteins
• Crystal interiors and surfaces
• STM-built patterns on crystal surfaces
• Organic molecules, organometallic complexes
• Closed-shell metal clusters and quantum dots
• Nanotube segments and ends
• Biomolecular components (enzymes, photosynthetic centers,
molecular motors).
These examples illustrate some limits of fabrication capabilities today.

This section briefly The only large structures are simple and regular—crystals; the only
answers basic questions complex, 3D structures are polymers—proteins and DNA. Atomically
about atomic precision,
precise, STM-built patterns are at a very early stage of development.
The remaining examples represent components with a broad range of
and shows the motivation
functions. What is lacking is a systematic way to combine components
for work in the field. It also
to build complex systems.
provides a framework for
distinguishing near-term, Physical principles and examples from nature both indicate the promise
mid-term, and advanced of extending atomically precise fabrication to larger scales, greater
levels. complexity, and a wider range of materials. Table 1 outlines how
various aspects of atomic precision (control of feature size, surface
structure, etc.) enable useful properties and applications, many of which
have revolutionary potential. Applications of atomically precise systems
are presented in more detail later in this Nanotechnology Road Map.
The range of techniques to produce atomically precise structures is

already broad, and broader applications will follow as production
techniques are augmented with methods of greater power and
generality. To understand the promise of atomically precise
technologies, it helps to draw a clear distinction between what we can
do with today’s level of technology, and what we can identify as targets
for longer-term research and development, requiring advances in
crucial enabling technologies.
4 Atomic Precision Nanotechnology Roadmap

Table 1. Atomically precise structural control: kinds, results, and uses
Aspect of atomic
Enabled features and applications:
precision:
Precise internal Materials with novel properties (optical,
structures piezoelectric, electronic...) with extremely broad
applications
Defect-free materials that achieve their ideal
strength, conductivity, transparency... These apply to a range of
Absence of statistical fluctuations in dopants levels of fabrication
enabling scaling to smaller gate size capabilities (see Table 2)
3D bandgap engineering for systems of quantum

wells, wires, and dots
Systems of coupled spin centers for novel

computer devices, quantum computing
Atomic-scale feature High frequency devices, new sensors, high power-
size density mechanisms
20
High density digital circuitry, memory (up to ~10
3
devices per cm )
Precise patterns of Unique alignment of complementary surfaces for
surface charge, atomically precise self-assembly of complex, many-
polarity, shape, and component structures
reactivity
Precisely structured scanning-probe tips for
atomically precise manufacturing, improved
scanning probe microscopy
Molecular binding, sensing of specific biomolecules
Stereospecific and chiral catalysis
Filtering, purification, separation
Atomically smooth, Minimal scattering of electrons for low resistance

regular surfaces nanowires, ideal electron optics
“Epitaxial” alignment of matching surfaces for

atomically precise self-alignment, high-strength
interfaces
Non-bonding, out-of-register surfaces for sliding
interfaces with negligible static friction
Precisely identical System designs can exploit fine-tuning of
structures properties
System designs can exploit symmetries among

identical components
Reproducible behavior simplifies fault identification
Nanotechnology Roadmap Atomic Precision 5

Techniques for implementing atomically precise systems are often
based on atomically precise tools. For example, organic synthesis
depends on organic reagents; atomically precise biopolymeric structures
are built by molecular machine systems made of similar materials. Thus,
atomically precise manipulation of surfaces could benefit from the use
of atomically precise tool-tips. Some of the anticipated developments
Anticipated developments derive directly from the achievement of intermediate, enabling goals.
may derive directly from Consequently, intermediate goals are of special strategic importance in
the achievement of
formulating plans for technology development.
intermediate, enabling
The promise of atomically precise fabrication springs from the diversity
goals, which lends them a of techniques and approaches that have emerged, and from the many
special strategic ways in which these might be combined to move the field forward. This
importance in the diversity, however, complicates any attempt to describe pathways and
formulation of plans for levels of anticipated development. Table 2 provides a simple overview.
technology development. Moving from current capabilities, two complementary lines of
development emerge: one anchored in direct manipulation of atomic
and molecular structures by means of scanning probe devices, the other
anchored in atomically precise self-assembly of diverse components
organized by folded polymers. Downstream, advances lead to atomically
precise fabrication based on productive nanosystems, and a
convergence of these lines of development. This schematic perspective
serves to show broad directions of advance, and to distinguish near-
term developments from those that can be approached only by means
of intermediate stages.
Progress in this area will raise familiar constellations of challenges, such

as:
• Design and modeling
• Device properties
• Spatial organization and interconnection of components
• Interfacing to macroscale systems
• Production methods, cost, and yield
• Device degradation and lifetime
• System-level defect tolerance
Later in this document we address the critical research challenges that

must be met to move forward toward applications and toward enablers
for a succession of next-generation technologies.
6 Atomic Precision Nanotechnology Roadmap

Table 2. Existing and projected capability levels in atomically precise fabrication.
Atoms in Typical product
Fabrication Input typical quantity†
Years methods* materials Product type product grams units
Current Level
2007 Tip-based APM Small Patterned crystal 1.E+02 1.E-21 1.E+00
molecules surfaces
Organic synthesis Various Varied covalent 1.E+02 1.E+00 1.E+21
reagents structures
Protein Biological 3D folded 1.E+03 1.E+00 1.E+20
engineering, substrates polymers
Ribosome as APPN
Structural DNA Biological 3D polymer 1.E+06 1.E-06 1.E+11
design, Polymer- substrates frameworks
ase as APPN
Special processes (Diverse) Nanocrystals, — — —
nanotubes,
others (diverse)
Next Generation
2 – 10 Tip-array APM Small Layered ? ? ?
molecules crystalline
structures,
multiple
materials
Self-assembly of Building 3D biopolymer 1.E+07 1.E-03 1.E+13
composite blocks: frameworks,
nanosystems DNA, diverse
protein, components
and other
Level 1
5 – 15 Tip-array APM Small Diverse 3D ? ? ?
molecules structures,
diverse materials
Artificial polymer- Diverse Robust polymer- 1.E+08 1.E+00 1.E+15
building APPNs, monomeric based composite
guided assembly building nanosystems
blocks
Level 2
10 – 25 Solid-building Small Robust systems 1.E+09 1.E+01 1.E+15
APPNs (converged molecules built of diverse
technologies) engineering
materials
Level 3
15 – 30 Scalable APPN- Small Systems at the 1.E+10 1.E+02 1.E+15
array systems, molecules level of
directed assembly complexity of
2007 macroscale
products
Level 3+
15 – Scaled APPN-array Small Large arrays of 1.E+26 1.E+03 1.E+00
30+ systems molecules complex systems
*Typically combined with other nanotechnologies: nanolithography, nanoparticles, SAMs, etc.
†Rough order of magnitude of quantity per lab-scale production run.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Atomic Precision 7

Atomically Precise Manufacturing
APM will play a growing role in atomically precise fabrication,
expanding both the production volume and capabilities of atomically
precise products. The two approaches in use today are tip-based APM,
which uses STM or AFM mechanisms to pattern surfaces with atomic
precision, and bio-based APM, which uses the natural, programmable
molecular machinery of living cells to produce atomically precise
molecular objects. These approaches are complementary because they
address different problems and have potential synergies when used in
Bio-based APM can be
combination. APM in all its forms can both exploit and extend the
used to produce large,
capabilities being developed in the broader field of nanotechnology.
complex, functional
nanosystems.
Potential of Bio-Based APM to Produce Large,
Complex, Functional Nanosystems
The largest complex, atomically precise objects fabricated as of 2007 are
made of DNA. These DNA constructions comprise helical rods linked
to form combinations of sheets, tubes, and triangulated structural
frameworks. For DNA constructions of established types made in well-
equipped facilities, it is currently feasible to complete the design and
fabrication cycle for new product in about one day, and an established
type of DNA construction has been licensed for commercial use.
Looking forward, DNA constructions appear able to position hundreds
to thousands of distinct components to addressable locations in three-
dimensional patterns.
Table 3. Functional properties and roles of DNA, protein, and specialized

structures in modular molecular composite nanosystems.
Engineering protein molecules is now routine and produces complex

objects built around dense polymer cores. Protein molecules can be
8 Atomically Precise Manufacturing Nanotechnology Roadmap

engineered to bind to DNA, to each other, and to a wide range of
atomically precise structures. Moreover, a wide range molecules and
nanostructures can be directly and covalently linked to DNA
constructions. Together, these capabilities enable the development of
atomically precise self-assembled modular molecular composite
nanosystems.
Areas of Nanotechnology Where Bio-Based Modular

Molecular Composite Nanosystems Are Applicable
In building large, self-assembled systems, these components can work
together:
• DNA constructions are well suited to serve as frameworks.
• Nanometer-scale protein molecules are well-suited to serve
as precision binding structures. Their mechanical properties
are typically comparable to those of engineering resins such
as epoxies and polycarbonates.
• A host of particles, fibers, and surfaces are well-suited to
serve as high-performance structural and functional
components.
Numerous fields of nanotechnology research have produced functional

components. In many instances, this work may find a new level of
payoff through the use of MMCNs to organize these components to
form functional systems.
Main Challenges for Applications Using

Self-Assembling MMCNs
The development of self-assembling MMCNs presents challenges
related to the design of building blocks and of complementary interfaces
between them. A major advantage of DNA is that interfaces for APSA
can be provided by simply matching bases. Protein design, by contrast,
requires computational search of a large combinatorial space. Special
functional structures offer only highly constrained options for surface
design, which must be accommodated by other system elements.
Biopolymers have a restricted range of properties and limited stability,

with rigidity similar to that of engineering materials such as epoxy and
polycarbonates. Although some organisms live at >100°C, the tolerance
of biopolymers for high temperatures is limited. Many naturally
occurring proteins, in particular, are notorious for low stability.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Atomically Precise Manufacturing 9

Increasing the stability and range of operating environments feasible for
products of bio-APM is a major challenge. Progress has been made both
in designing proteins for higher than natural stability and in using
unnatural conditions, such as dry organic solvents, to increase their
stability. In addition, designs should be sought in which biopolymers
play an organizing role during fabrication, and then are no longer
necessary.
For large-scale applications of MMCN, a further challenge is the cost of

materials. Bulk DNA production costs are currently in the dollars per
milligram range (or higher). The application of bioengineering
techniques, however, promises to bring this cost down to dollars per
kilogram, comparable to that of many other biopolymers.
Approaches Embraced by Tip-Based APM

Tip-based APM-style manipulation has been performed on many
The range of potential materials, with positioning of many kinds of atoms and molecules. The
process and resulting range of potential processes and resulting structures therefore may be
structures associated with
quite broad. However, most of the work to date has involved lateral
displacement of weakly bound species on surfaces. For APM to become
tip-based APM is quite
viable, new processes must be developed that exploit the inherent
broad.
resolution of scanning probe tools, but permit covalent bonding to build
three-dimensional structures. Identified approaches include transfer
and deposition of atoms, and removal of atoms or molecules to create
reactive surfaces for precisely tailored crystal growth (patterned atomic
layer epitaxy or ALE). Patterned ALE is presently a target of commercial
research.
Challenges for Tip-based APM in Process

Development and Scale-Up
It remains a challenge to develop a tip-APM process that operates
quickly and with a low product defect rate. In terms of mass
throughput, the rate of production possible by means of macroscopic
tip-based APM systems is inherently low, but increases in speed expand
the size and complexity of feasible products. These challenges can be
addressed by a combination of advances in several areas:
• Identification of tractable combinations of surfaces and
building blocks.
• Development of improved and more reproducible structures
for scanning tunneling microscope tips to be used for
patterned ALE.

• Development of tips that can capture and deposit atoms or
molecules for mechanosynthesis.
• Improvement in the stability and control provided by tip
positioning mechanisms.
• Simultaneous use of many tips to increase fabrication speeds.
One of the more promising paths for scaling up to relatively large

numbers of tips is the use of micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS)
–based closed loop nanopositioning systems. Recent advances in
CMOS-compatible MEMS closed loop systems suggest that small-
footprint intelligent scanning systems could be developed and down-
scaled to produce relatively large arrays of tips that could operate at
high frequencies. However, even with these advancements, macro-scale
manufacturing tools that employ tip-based APM will need a throughput
that will produce significant value per unit.
This suggests applications in areas such as sensors (DNA sequencing, Perhaps the most impor-
for example), information processing (quantum encryption and tant contribution of tip-
computing), and the creation of atomically precise tools (such as based APM will be to
nanoimprint templates). Perhaps the most important contribution of make the atomically
tip-based APM will be to make the atomically precise components precise components
required for productive nanosystems. required for productive
nanosystems
Complementary Nature of Tip-Based and
Bio-Based Technologies
It should be clear that tip-based and bio-based APM technologies
address different problems, face different challenges, and provide
different results. They are in no sense competitors, but are in fact
complementary. Moreover, the MMCN vision embraces self-assembled
structures that interface with the products of tip-APM systems. Each
approach increases the value of the other, because both together
promise to enable a broader range of products and applications.
Cascade Effect of Advances in APM and

Other Technologies
Bio-APM processes in living cells build bio-APM mechanisms, and this
points to the feasibility of developing biomimetic APM systems, some of
which could enable the fabrication of a wider range of polymer
structures than that found in biology.
Looking forward, expanding the range of feasible components will

increase the performance of feasible products, including APM systems.
Advances in APM can therefore be directly applicable to improving

next-generation APM. Iterating this process toward higher performance
materials leads toward structures (for example, ceramics) that are
denser and more stable than biopolymers. APM systems that build
products of this sort are envisioned to use flexible tip-based processes,
since biomimetic approaches appear to have limited value in this area.
Further development will This anticipated convergence on tip-based inorganic systems suggests
involve broadening the that near-term, tip-based APM methods might be more directly
range of structures that developed in this direction. The approaches of this kind also involve
can be built, leading to broadening the range of structures that can be built, leading to
nanoscale structures that nanoscale structures that by themselves provide the central components
by themselves provide the necessary for APM. As always, hybrid approaches that combine the
central components strengths of different lines of development may prove attractive.
necessary for APM. As
always, hybrid approaches
It should be noted that these lines of advance remain speculative in
their specifics. A case can be made that adequate tools will become
that combine the strengths
available, and basic physical principles appear favorable, yet the absence
of different lines of
of concrete designs limits conclusions that can be drawn regarding
development may prove
downstream objectives, development times, costs, and so forth.
attractive.
Some general features are clear, however. For example, physical
principles indicate the feasibility of highly productive nanosystems.
Elementary mechanical scaling laws indicate that tip-based mechanisms
on a 100 nm scale can be expected to operate with high motion
frequencies (KHz to MHz). This rate is sufficient for an APM tip
mechanism assembly to process a mass comparable to that of the
mechanism itself in a practical length of time (a day or less). Taking into
account requirements for power, coolant, power, control signals, and
transport of feedstocks and products, one can envision planar structures
that provide arrays of specialized, productive, nanoscale mechanisms,
and the design and coordination of these mechanisms extrude
macroscale products constructed from building blocks that are
themselves sophisticated nanosystems.
As pointed out by a recent study sponsored by the US National

Academies, there are uncertain constraints on the performance of APM
systems. One is the error rate in the unit operations, which is related to
another, which is thermodynamic efficiency. These are a function of
numerous conditions, including the thermodynamic requirement that
energy be dissipated to drive each step forward, and the magnitude of
the energy barriers that separate paths leading to desired and undesired
outcomes. To the extent that discussions in the Roadmap considers
prospects for downstream products, the usual premise will be that error
rates and energy costs are roughly in line with those seen in bio-based
APM processes today.

Position of APM in Current Nanotechnologies
At a component level, products of bio-based APM, such as MMCNs,
are naturally complementary to a host of nanotechnology products.
Some provide atomically precise interfaces suitable for self-assembly,
and these can in many instances join and extend the atomically precise
domain of a larger system. More generally, even atomically irregular
nanoparticles, fibers, and surfaces can provide functionality to be
organized by an atomically precise framework. Conversely, APM APM products will expand
products will expand the array of building blocks available for the array of building
developing nanomaterials and nanosystems of all kinds. APM and other blocks available for
nanotechnologies lend each other greater value. developing nanomaterials
and nanosystems of all
Among the most attractive prospective applications of APM, both tip- kinds.
based and bio-based, are those that build on nanolithography and
nanoscale electronic circuitry. There is a natural fit between these
technologies in interfacing between the nano and macro worlds,
enabling the flow of energy and information in one direction, and data
from sensors, memories, or nanocircuitry in the other. The advances
driven by APM lend further weight to the widespread view that
atomically precise fabrication will become part of the ongoing
revolution in microelectronics.

Atomically Precise Components and Systems
The applications of any manufacturing system depend on the structural
frameworks, functional elements, and systems that can be built using it.
The same holds with atomically precise manufacturing (APM). This
section gives a brief overview of APM capabilities related to product
structure and function. It is not intended to serve as a complete survey.
Structural Frameworks—A Limiting Factor

in Applications of Nanosystems Engineering
The weakness of structural The manufacture of atomically precise individual devices, such as
frameworks in the area of molecular wires and switches, has been demonstrated. However, the
nanosystems engineering devices have seen little use, largely because of the lag in the further
can be overcome by the development of technology to make comparably precise frameworks to
development of APM-
hold and organize them. Transistors and conductors would have
remained laboratory curiosities if the technology to organize them to
based fabrication.
form circuits would not have matured. Similarly, we know of the
development of many molecular motors, bearings, and so forth, but we
do not have a way to connect them to build systems.
This limiting factor is not critical in the field. Some applications of

APFNs require no frameworks. For example, enzyme-like catalysts
could function in solution or could be bound to conventional high-
surface-area substrates, as is done with similar functional entities in
current industrial practice.
Promising Results of APM-Based Fabrication

Tip-based APM exploits crystal surfaces to provide large, rigid
structures. These surfaces provide a structure on which tip-based
manipulation can build functional elements. One class of structures
could be “sockets” that provide atomically precise interfaces able to
direct the atomically precise binding (self-assembly) of diverse
functional elements, exploiting components developed by other
methods means of fabrication.
Self-assembly of moderately complex molecular components provides

an alternative means of fabrication of atomically precise frameworks for
complex nanosystems. To accomplish this, the components must be
designable, in the sense that a systematic procedure enables the
selection of structure from a large range of possibilities. This design
freedom is required to enable the fabrication of interfaces that match
other components, including the many unique, pairwise-matching
interfaces required to organize the self-asssembly of information-rich,
14 Atomically Precise Components and Systems Nanotechnology Roadmap

aperiodic structures of the sort that abound in conventional engineered
systems.
Ultimately, any of a range of structures built by incremental addition of

different building blocks could serve this function. Today, the accessible
structures of this class are restricted to polymers that are built stepwise,
with a choice of monomers at each step. Wholly synthetic versions of
such polymers have been experimentally realized, and these have
unique properties, but the premier examples are biopolymers built by
APM systems provided by nature. These are proteins and the nucleic
acids, RNA and DNA. Extending this set to enable routine use of robust,
non-biological polymers is an objective with potentially high payoff. Advances in APM will
expand the diverse set of
Structures that, like these polymers, are formed in a systematic way precise, exploitable
from multiple components are termed “modular.” Modular molecular functional elements that
composite nanosystems are self-assembled systems in which several have been developed
different kinds of building blocks are organized by frameworks based on already, providing new
self-assembling units with a modular structure. Using a combination of ways to organize and
DNA and proteins to organize functional elements derived from other exploit them and creating
nanotechnologies appears attractive. nanosystems at a new scale
of size, complexity, and
Precise, Exploitable Functional Elements Now Available sophistication.
In recent years, billions of dollars have been invested in exploring and

developing functional elements on the nanoscale. These include:
• Organic molecules and organometallic complexes with
useful optical and catalytic activities.
• Closed-shell metal clusters and quantum dots with unique
electronic properties.
• Nanotubes with extraordinary strength, stiffness, and
conductivity.
• Lithographically patterned electronic devices with features
smaller than macromolecules.
• Biomolecular devices with the diverse photochemical,
mechanical, catalytic (etc.) activities essential to
photosynthesis, motion, and metabolism in living cells,
including APM functionality.
APM-based fabrication will leverage past research investments by

providing a new means to organize and exploit these functional
elements, creating nanosystems at a new scale of size, complexity, and
sophistication.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Atomically Precise Components and Systems 15

Functional Elements and Systems Enabled by APM
Advances in APM will enable a wider range of materials to be patterned
with atomic precision. The resulting expansion in the range of
functional devices will generically enable higher performance, greater
stability, and longer functional lifetimes. A few of the devices expected
to become feasible along this development path include:
• Circuitry based on integrated nanotube conductors,
semiconductors, and junctions.
• Arrays of identical or smoothly graded quantum dots,
promoting controlled transfer of electrons and electronic
excitations.
• Digital devices based on transitions in precisely coupled spin
systems.
• Nanoscale memory cells organized into 3D crystalline arrays
with ≥1018 bits per cubic centimeter.
• Catalytic molecular machinery that couples mechanical
energy to chemical transformations.
Advances in APM-enabled device fabrication will combine with other

fabrication techniques to expand the technology base for development
of atomically precise systems. The section on Application Highlights
will explore some of the application-level capabilities that are expected
to emerge.
Relevance of Physics-Based Modeling

It is important to recognize that physics-based modeling can provide
The potential of advanced- insights into the capabilities of physical systems whose implementation
generation nanosystems is beyond reach of current-generation fabrication technologies. Systems
can be understood in part of this class arise naturally in considering multi-stage development of
by physics-based modeling. advanced fabrication systems. Physics-based modeling can provide an
indication of the potential that can be unlocked by pursuing various
lines of development. Placing systems of this class in the context of a
multi-stage roadmap also puts them in a clarifying perspective, showing
both their connection to, and their distance from, the technologies of
today or the next decade.
16 Atomically Precise Components and Systems Nanotechnology Roadmap

Design, Modeling, and Characterization
Modeled Properties
Design, modeling, and characterization technologies together are
intimate components of the design cycle in technology development. Some commonly modeled
Design and modeling are closely intertwined, ultimately guiding properties important to AP
fabrication. Characterization technologies—imaging and measurement components and systems:
—provide the data that validate or drive revision of both designs and
models. Characterization technologies are crucial, but largely adequate • Structural geometry,
today. Design and modeling, by contrast, will set the pace of rigidity
development for many atomically precise technologies. They drive • Molecular dynamics
demand for more better data, models, algorithms, and computers. behavior
(“Modeling” as used here includes simulation by dynamic models.) • Energy of reactant
molecules
APT Design Requirements • Energy of transition
state barriers
By its nature, APT requires atomistic modeling. Beyond this, however,
domain-specific requirements vary widely. Processes that involve bond • Energy of protein
rearrangement, unusual structures, electron transport, or electronic unfolding
state transitions typically demand quantum-mechanical modeling of • Energy of non-
electron distributions and energies. Processes that involve atomic covalent binding
motion and molecular displacement and deformation are typically
• Dynamic friction,
addressed by molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics methods.
thermalization
To reduce computational burdens, reduced models are common,
treating groups of atoms as single bodies, or (in the limiting case) • Transport of thermal
subsuming them into non-atomistic models of elastic or even rigid solid energy
bodies. At this level, the techniques are those familiar in macroscale • Transport of electron,
modeling and design. holes
• Electrostatic dipoles,
Choosing a specific model always involves trade-offs of the speed of
forces
computation, the scale of the structures modeled, and the accuracy of
the results. Quantum methods in particular embrace a range of models • Energies of electronic
(levels of theory) that differ widely in their computational tractability: transitions
Some allow dynamical studies of thousands of atoms; others strain • Optical refraction,
available computational resources in order to provide great precision in absorption
describing small molecules. Molecular mechanics and dynamics models • Nonlinear optical
rely on direct approximations to the forces among atoms, and currently
coefficients
scale to systems with up to millions of atoms. The accuracy of the latter
methods (for suitably chosen classes of systems) can be judged by the • Spin-spin interaction
fact that they are used to gain insights into the balance of weak dynamics
interatomic forces responsible for the geometry and dynamics of • Magnetic domain
proteins and other biomolecules. dynamics
Extending the scale, scope, and accuracy of atomistic modeling

techniques is a high priority and can greatly facilitate APT design and
implementation. Integrating atomistic and non-atomistic models at
different levels and scales is key to enabling practical design and
Nanotechnology Roadmap Design, Modeling, and Characterization 17

simulation of large, complex AP nanosystems. This is an area of
ongoing research activity.
Near-Term Potential for Design and Development

In assessing the near-term potential for the design and fabrication of
APT systems, it is necessary to assess the adequacy of existing modeling
techniques in support of the design process. This is a matter of
particular concern because of the existence of many physical systems of
APT design requires multi- interest for which the predictive power of existing models is very poor,
level, multi-scale modeling often giving qualitatively incorrect results (for example, predicting
of diverse phenomena. stability for a system that is in reality unstable).
For design problems, the adequacy of a model cannot be assessed

without considering the practical question it must answer. Design can
succeed, and even be reliable, in domains where models have substantial
inaccuracy and can give qualitatively incorrect results. What is required
Design and development
for success is not universal predictive accuracy, but instead is the ability
can succeed despite
to identify a suitable class of systems within the domain. To be suitable
incomplete knowledge.
for the purpose of design, members of this class must be sufficiently
well-behaved to be insensitive to modeling errors, and the class must
include members that satisfy the relevant set of design requirements.
What constitutes sufficient insensitivity, however, typically depends on
whether these requirements are stringent or loose, hence the
importance of knowing the practical design question before judging the
adequacy of a model.
Even very incomplete knowledge can aid a technology development

program. Even a weakly predictive model can speed development by
directing experimental research away from likely failures and toward
systems that are viable candidates for success. Experimental trial and
error is often an acceptable development method, provided that success
is sufficiently common, and that trials are not prohibitively slow or
expensive.
Developments That Can Reducing Modeling Difficulty

Advances in AP fabrication will enable practical applications of an
increasing range of structures and phenomena, increasing demands on
modeling techniques by driving expansion of their scope, and increasing
the demand for faster and more routine methods that are applicable in
the context of system design.
However, in one important respect, advances in AP fabrication can

make successful modeling less demanding. Advanced fabrication
techniques can in many instances make components with improved the
18 Design, Modeling, and Characterization Nanotechnology Roadmap

stability, rigidity, and performance. These improvements tend to make
the structural behavior of components less sensitive to small errors in
model energies, and they can also be used to increase the margin of Advances in AP
safety by which components satisfy design requirements. This again fabrication can in some
reduces sensitivity to errors. instances reduce modeling
requirements.
As a consequence, currently accessible products may require more
advanced modeling techniques, while analogous advanced products do
not. This inverse relationship is illustrated by molecular machines,
where protein-based devices remain a great challenge to modeling, but
not to fabrication, while machines made of rigid AP components can be
easy to model, despite being inaccessible to current and near-term
fabrication techniques. This relationship facilitates, to an unexpected
degree, the use of current modeling techniques to explore and evaluate
the general properties of classes of systems in order to weigh their
potential value as longer-term development objectives.
Innovation Needed in Computer-Aided Design

Each unique domain of atomistic modeling (see list of Modeled
Properties at the beginning of this section) creates corresponding
unique demands on computer aided design (CAD) tools. At all but the
largest scales, conventional approaches are inapplicable because of the
discrete nature of component structures: One must drop the
assumption that dimensions, electrical properties, etc., can be varied in
a continuous way. This is in many ways more fundamental than
differences in the applicable device physics.
For structures to be made by means of tip-directed APM processes,

product geometry results directly from a programmed sequence of APT developments
motions of a tool with respect to a workpiece. This directness applies demand innovations in
both to current and next-generation APM based on scanning-probe computer-aided design.
instruments and to envisioned advanced-generation productive
nanosystems. Domain-specific CAD requirements in this area are
driven chiefly by the need to model discrete structures with appropriate
device and process physics.
In AP self-assembled systems, by contrast, structure and fabrication

become related in a far more intimate way. At every stage of assembly,
at least one component must be free to diffuse in a solvent, enabling it
to explore all possible positions and orientations to find its unique,
intended binding site. This process requires that the component be
soluble, that it have a surface complementary to that of its intended
binding site, and that all other surfaces of the workpiece and the
component be sufficiently non-complementary that stable binding is

precluded. These requirements are added on top of functional
requirements.
Identification of designs in which components have appropriate

surfaces and matching interfaces characteristically requires an
automated computation search mechanism. In many DNA structures,
“sticky ends” serve as complementary interfaces, while in proteins,
folding requirements can be viewed as extending self-assembly
constraints to the interior of the molecule. In both instances, design
tools today rely on search in the combinatorial space of alternative
monomer sequences. Improving success rates and product performance
will likely require improvements in this class of algorithms, chiefly in
the definition of suitable objective functions.
Future-generation APSA systems, perhaps exploiting components

produced by new classes of APPNs, appear likely to share this
requirement for integrating search-based operations in CAD tools and
design processes. A similar need for search will arise when tip-based
APM systems are used to manufacture structures that satisfy surface-
defined constraints by means of structures that depart greatly from
crystalline order.
Multi-level modeling is motivated by the great differences in scope and

computational cost associated with different modeling techniques, and
this will need to be integrated into CAD tools and the design process in
two distinct ways. The first is the application of different techniques to
different parts of a system, for example, applying quantum methods to
describe reactions, while applying molecular mechanics methods to
describe the structures that support and constrain the reacting
components. This has been achieved and applied, for example, in
modeling enzymes. Expanding this principle to mixed models of more
kinds is an important objective. The second role for multi-level
modeling is design refinement. In this application, less-accurate, lower-
cost techniques are used for exploratory purposed, to identify systems
that are worth further investigation using more-accurate, higher-cost
techniques. It will be important to provide smooth integration of this
methodology into CAD tools for developing APT systems.
Characterization Methods Enable Refinement of

Characterization methods All the Other Methods
enable refinement of
designs, models, and
The development cycle in systems engineering loops through design
and modeling (for example, computational simulation) until an
fabrication methods.
apparently satisfactory result is achieved. Fabrication and physical
testing then provide the ultimate feedback on the success of a design.
20 Design, Modeling, and Characterization Nanotechnology Roadmap

The quality of this feedback determines its effectiveness in guiding any
necessary revisions in the fabrication method, the model, or the design.
It is crucial to know, for example, whether a failure results from a
difference between what was designed and what was made (a
fabrication problem), or from a difference between the properties
predicted and the properties observed (a modeling problem). In either
case, the best response may be to change the design to make it more
robust, rather than to correct either the model or the fabrication
process.
Improved characterization methods will aid development of AP Improved tools for

nanosystems, but the needs and ingenuity of the scientific community characterizing AP nano-
have already provided remarkably capable tools. Nanoscale and atomic systems will be of great
scale sensing, imaging, and metrology have been achieved in a plethora value, but the present state
of ways. These methods do not solve all problems, but their capabilities of the art provides an ade-
are immense and growing rapidly. Improved tools for characterizing AP quate basis for progress.
nanosystems will be of great value, but the present state of the art
provides an adequate basis for progress.

Applications
The scope of the Roadmap can be summarized as technologies which
could either undergo major paradigm shifts with the advent of
atomically precise manufacturing (APM) or themselves enable APM.
Such technologies will draw on a wide range of disciplines and catalyze
innovation across many markets and industries.
Technologies relevant to APM includes not only advanced productive nanosystems, but also a
APM include advanced range of nanoscale fabrication technologies that are themselves rapidly
functional nanosystems, evolving:
which incorporate
• Atomically precise, computer-controlled deprotection of
products of APM. The
surfaces for selective growth
application potential is
significant and wide • Molecular manipulation using scanning probe microscopes
reaching. • Controlled self-assembly of atomically precise building
blocks
• Exploitation of existing (e.g., biological) productive
nanosystems
• Organic synthesis of modular, extensible nanoscale
structures.
These existing APM technologies have broad utility in themselves and

have been identified as enablers for productive nanosystem
development. Technologies relevant to APM include advanced
functional nanosystems, which incorporate products of APM. The
application potential is significant and wide reaching when one
considers that atomically precise functional nanosystems will impact
the development and evolution of the following applications during the
next 10 to 20 years:
• Energy production
• Health care
• Computation
• Smart materials
• Instrumentation
• Chemical Production (Catalysts)
These applications are the drivers for the development of APM,

atomically precise functional nanosystems, and ultimately productive
nanosystems. Some applications will employ hybrid systems, such as
nanolithographic structures interfaced to atomically precise devices,
others will leverage the hybridization of controlled self-assembly with
22 Applications Nanotechnology Roadmap

atomically precise targeting tools, and still others will utilize the as yet
undiscovered integration of the individual pathways and technologies
that are discussed in this Roadmap.
Advanced functional nanosystems—products of APM—will lead to the Clean, efficient, and cost-
innovation of productive nanosystems. These, in turn, will advance effective energy and long
APM, enabling yet more products and applications. Thus, a focus on awaited breakthroughs in
technologies and applications relevant to APM will facilitate the targeted multi-functional
emerging revolution of productive nanosystems, and hence will support in-vivo and in-vitro
the vision articulated by this Roadmap initiative. The grand challenges therapeutics and
for clean, efficient, and cost-effective energy and long awaited diagnostic devices for
breakthroughs in targeted multi-functional in-vivo and in-vitro cancer and other diseases
therapeutics and diagnostic devices for cancer and other diseases are are two of the most
two of the most compelling drivers to advance the development of compelling drivers to
atomically precise technologies. advance the development
of atomically precise
From the industrial point of view, the most attractive near-term
technologies.
applications for Atomically Precise Technologies are those which are
high-value applications that exploit the atomic precision of an APM
output and are enabled with a very small volume of atomically precise
matter. Good candidates for these applications are sensors, metrology
standards, and quantum computing. Although an application with a
very large market would be ideal, the initial applications may very well
be niche applications with a modest market. This hypothetical niche
market might not be worth the initial investment of developing APM,
However, for a company bold enough to make that investment, once
such an application demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of APM,
the investments to develop slightly more ambitious products would
follow. Growing revenues from those products would start the
economic drivers that would produce the manufacturing throughput
and capability to capitalize on the applications listed below and many
others.
Government funding to the extent that it is made available will

accelerate development of APM technology, but should not be counted
on to replace the market drive to more ambitious applications.
Government funding is best suited to promote several to many of the
more promising paths to APM, as opposed to a huge effort aimed at an
outcome that will not come to fruition for many years.
The following is a brief sampling of applications that will benefit from

atomically precise technologies. A more extensive overview of
applications is presented in the Working Group Proceedings section.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Applications 23

Application Development Opportunities for Atomically
Precise Technologies
Fuel Cells
PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cells represent a class of
technology that is expected to eventually become a major source of
clean energy, because of their environmentally friendly operating
characteristics and uniquely high energy-conversion efficiency. Despite
definitive advances in recent years, existing fuel-cell technology still has
several challenges, including: (i) the lower than theoretical efficiency of
energy conversion, (ii) the high platinum content of electrocatalysts,
and (iii) the instability of platinum under long-term operational cycling
conditions.
The solution to these three performance issues can be addressed with a

combination of (i) designing catalysts using advanced theoretical
methods, (ii) atomically precise manufacturing of catalysts, and (iii)
further improvement of in situ characterization with atomic specificity
and sub-angstrom resolution.
The benefits of atomically precise manufacturing may seem difficult to

achieve at first given the system’s complexity, however, small metal
nanoparticles of 2 to 5 nm in diameter may be single crystal particles
without steps and kinks. Due to a combination of quantum confinement
and surface effects, such particles can have substantially different
catalytic properties from bulk samples of the same material. Placing
atoms of a catalyst, or catalyst modifier, on the well-ordered facets of a
nanoparticle support with atomic precision can be conducive to
significantly improving their properties and fuel system performance, or
could mimic the catalytic properties of, for example, Pt in a material
with far lower cost. Thus, we may be able to “tailor” the adlayer
structure for a particular reaction to obtain the optimal “ensemble
effect” for a particular reactant while optimizing the spill-over effect via
the right coverage, to block the adsorption of catalytic poisons. (See
Adzic, Paper 32, Working Group Proceedings.)
Energy Efficient Solid State Lighting

Artificial lighting is extremely inefficient: 22% of the nation’s electricity
(or 8% of the nation’s total energy) was used for artificial lighting in
2001. The cost of this energy to the consumer was roughly $50 billion
per year or approximately $200 per year for every person living in the
U.S. The cost to the environment, furthermore, was approximately 130
million tons of carbon emissions. This inefficiency is rooted in the fact

that conventional technologies generate light as a by-product of
energetic processes such as heat or a plasma.
Solid-state lighting (SSL) offers the potential to revolutionize the

efficiency of artificial light. It can be defined as the direct conversion of
electricity to light in a semiconductor. Today, SSL suitable for
illumination has a power conversion efficiency significantly less than
100%, but it is steadily increasing and there is no known fundamental
physical barrier to achieving high efficiencies for white light generation.
SSL capabilities would be revolutionized via the controlled arrangement
of the charge transporting and light emitting building blocks with
atomically precise manufacturing technologies. Light emitting devices
(LEDs) utilize crystalline semiconductors where the management of
simgle atomic defects is important for efficient charge transport and
light output. In contrast, organic light emitting devices (OLEDs) are
based on largely amorphous, very thin films of molecular materials. The
potential for atomic precision between the molecular building blocks of
an OLED is largely unexplored territory.
For example, it is currently the relatively low efficiency of blue light Small molecular building
emission that limits the overall efficiency and stability of white OLEDs. blocks can be incorporated
Using molecular engineering, however, it has recently been into larger, tractable
demonstrated that small molecular building blocks can be incorporated molecules with excellent
into larger, tractable molecules with excellent electron transport electron transport
properties by using saturated linkers to extend the size of the molecule properties by using
without extending its conjugation length. saturated linkers to extend
the size of the molecule
We do not currently have the synthetic techniques to combine without extending its
molecular building blocks with monodisperse noble metal nanoparticles
conjugation length.
with atomic precision in an electroluminescent device. If such
techniques could be developed, the efficiency of fluorescent OLEDs and
conventional LEDs could likely be increased multifold via plasmonic
effects, with a concomitant increase in the efficiency of solid state
lighting devices.
These effects cannot currently be exploited because we lack the

technology to assemble the bulk structure with molecular precision. If
we could do so, the potential exists for both LEDs and OLEDs with
close to 100% of the thermodynamic efficiency for conversion of
electricity to light. (See Burrows, Paper 35, Working Group
Proceedings.)
Solar Energy
Direct conversion of sunlight into energy using photovoltaic (PV)
devices is being increasingly recognized as an important component of

future global energy production. While silicon-based PV still dominates
the market, the cost on a dollar-per-watt basis remains about an order
of magnitude too high to compete with power generation from fossil
fuels except in certain niche applications. Thin film technologies
promise low cost PV advancements. Technologies such as nano-
structured organic photovoltaics (NOPV), thin film silicon, CIGS, etc.
are believed to be a key to future PV systems.
Currently, the conversion efficiency of existing NOPV is close to 5% (for

laboratory scale devices), which is a factor of three smaller than the best
efficiency demonstrated by CdTe thin film PV systems or amorphous-
silicon PV. While CdTe, Si and Grätzel cells are the most studied and
widely-used PV candidates today, their processing is more
technologically challenging, involving multiple steps of vacuum
deposition, selenization of metal precursors, cathode sputtering or
spraying, electro-deposition, and followed by the final encapsulation of
PV in a polymer layer and the deposition of a protective layer of glass.
The size of the PV modules made with this technology is defined by the
maximum size of the vacuum chamber. The largest size of CdSe thin-
layer PV demonstrated is only 30 x 30 cm2, and operated at 12.8 %
conversion efficiency. The alternative technology of thin layer PV
Grätzel cells have the problem of a liquid electrolyte which lacks
stability over time due to evaporation, operates in a limited range of
temperatures, and has a major problems with a charge collector
electrode material which degrades due to the corrosive environment of
electrolyte employed. Thin film monocrystalline silicon PV cells, on the
other hand, have major problems with (1) the thickness of Si, which
needs to be greater than 10 μm to absorb a significant amount of light,
which renders it less flexible; (2) the challenge of growth of large-area
monocrystalline silicon; (3) a wire-sawing problem; and (4) a conversion
efficiency degradation within the first year by 20 to 30% from the
original, followed by the steady decline over next several years.
With theoretical efficiency Low cost of NOPV, unlimited raw materials supply, low temperature
the same as conventional processing, and possibility to make large area devices on flexible
semiconductor based PV substrate cheaply make them very attractive. With theoretical efficiency
and low cost structure, the same as conventional semiconductor based PV and low cost
NOPV have a potential of structure, NOPV have a potential of achieving the goal of PV
achieving the goal of PV technology—economic generation of large-scale electrical power.
technology—economic
generation of large-scale In very general terms, an optimized NOPV device requires controlling
electrical power.
the organization of nanocomponents with the right gaps forming
interfaces with the right band offsets in a structure that is
thermodynamically stable. This general goal involves succeeding in
several tasks, some of which are described below.

1. Controlled synthesis of defect-free nanomaterials. This may
require development of better understanding of multivariable process of
nanomaterial synthesis. The challenge calls to improve our
understanding and control of defect formation and growth termination.
This in turn required development and improvement of growth
monitoring techniques and tools. This is a major opportunity for
atomically precise technology development as conventional synthesis
and directed self-assembly technologies encounter limitations.
2. New methods for atomically precise manufacturing or

controlled self-assembly of well characterized nanostructured
components into meso-scale devices. A significant advance would be
to achieve synthesis nanomaterials and assembly of macroscopic
structures in a single step.
3. Macroscopic applications that require from synthesis of large

amounts of materials homogeneous properties in an economical
way for basic, R&D, and production efforts efforts. New approaches
for synthesis of nanomaterial at the commercial scale will have to be
developed, and will require revolutionary engineering design.
4. Quality standards ought to be developed among various research

groups across the world in order to improve the quality of the
starting materials and establish their precise composition.
Standardized preparation methods should be developed in order to be
able to reproduce the material elsewhere.
5. New instrumentation should be developed to characterize

nanomaterials and to enable quality control. Lack of standard quality
assessment routines and the multiple instruments needed to
characterize quality of a single material make these processes extremely
time consuming.
6. New methods for modeling and simulation are required across

many size scales in order to understand and predict the properties
of the individual components and their interactions in a working
device. Moreover, since the characterization of nonmaterial is hindered
by size reduction and the convoluted structure of their interfaces theory
and simulation plays a fundamental role assisting the interpretation of
experimental data. (See Ivanov and Reboredo, Paper 36, Working
Group Proceedings.)
Piezoelectric Energy
Piezoelectric materials can generate electrical energy from mechanical
energy. This means that piezoceramics and piezopolymers can be
effectively used as motion sensors, but also that they can be used to

convert otherwise unused mechanical stress or vibration into usable
electrical energy. When a stress is applied to a ceramic piezoelectric
element, such as a PZT (lead zirconate titanate) disc, the electrical
energy created in the element is equal to the total mechanical energy
applied minus the energy required to deform the element. The
generated electrical energy is proportional to the elastic compliance of
the piezo material (the strain produced per unit of stress applied) and to
the square of the piezoelectric coupling factor of the material. This
action can generate large voltages, depending on the geometry of the
element, which may be reduced to lower voltages and the electrical
energy stored using a parallel capacitor.
The atomically precise manufacturing of piezoelectric materials would

enable unprecedented performance of and opportunities for these
materials for mechanical energy harvesting. The electrical energy
generated from a mechanical energy input into a piezoelectric element
is proportional to the capacitance of the element. One approach that is
used to increase the capacitance of a certain volume element is to
employ a multiple layer stack of piezo materials alternated with
electrodes rather than a single thicker element. This approach creates a
larger surface to volume ratio, contributing to a higher generated charge
and a comparatively lower voltage. There is difficulty in achieving
ultimately thin piezoceramic layers of desired perovskite solid solutions,
such as PZT, to maximize this effect using current experimental
methods. With specific control over the placement of atoms in the
construction of such a piezoelectric stack one could make each layer
minimally thin, perhaps one unit cells, and comprised of optimal
compositions of elements (Pb, Zr, Ti, O). Minimally thin electrodes
between the layers could be constructed without pinhole defects. The
coupling factor and elastic compliance of the assembly could be
optimized. Additionally, such control in layer fabrication could
conceivably enable the inclusion of piezoelectric mechanical energy
harvesting thin film skins on many surfaces, such as those of automobile
components, which undergo mechanical energy dissipation (vibration)
that is currently untapped as an energy source. (See Fifield, Paper 31,
Working Group Proceedings.)
Waveguides
Advances in waveguide technology have created the information
revolution of the past 20 years. Future advances in waveguide
technology due to atomically precise manufacturing (APM) could have
impacts that are as large as, or larger than, what has been experienced in
information technology and sensor fabrication, in addition to enabling
the development of silicon photonics.

The continued expansion of the data-carrying capacity of fiber-optics
networks requires the continued development of optical devices with
increased functionality. Of particular interest is the development of
amplifiers directly integrated into key passive components, such as star
couplers and wavelength demultiplexers, and the development of
components utilizing photonic band gaps or other specific
arrangements of multiple materials. In the case of amplifiers, APM will
allow higher dopant levels without quenching, leading to optical
amplification in shorter path lengths and allowing more compact (and
less expensive) device fabrication. APM will enhance the development
of photonic band gap (or similar) devices by allowing more precise
control of the refractive index patterns that enable the device function.
Additionally, the application of APM methods to electrode fabrication
may allow the realization of devices that are impossible using
conventional lithographic methods.
Waveguide sensors have multiple attractive features, including APM can enhance these
compactness, robustness, resistance to electromagnetic interference, sensors in multiple ways,
and remote connection to instrumentation using optical fibers. These including the fabrication
sensors primarily operate using either evanescent field sensing of patterned surfaces on
techniques (grating couplers, waveguide interferometers, surface the waveguide to allow
plasmon resonance sensors) or surface acoustic wave techniques. In detection of multiple
both cases, the waveguide surface is treated to allow binding of the targets, formation of
desired species, which alters the signal propagating along the tailored binding sites to
waveguide. APM can enhance these sensors in multiple ways, including reduce the non-specific
the fabrication of patterned surfaces on the waveguide to allow binding of other species to
detection of multiple targets, formation of tailored binding sites to the surface, and the
reduce the non-specific binding of other species to the surface, and the
fabrication of waveguides
fabrication of waveguides with tailored optical or acoustical properties
with tailored optical or
that would allow for improved or alternate signal transduction.
acoustical properties that
Silicon photonics is an effort to increase the bandwidth of the connec- would allow for improved
tions between microprocessors by using optical transfer of data. The or alternate signal
key is all components of the optical interconnects must be fabricated as transduction.
part of the CMOS manufacturing, using standard techniques. Although
silicon waveguides have been used for some time, only recently has
continuous lasing been demonstrated in silicon. Because of the much
smaller size of optical components in silicon as opposed to silica, APM
techniques will be required to allow for the fabrication of the full range
of silicon optical components (waveguides, lasers, amplifiers, filters,
resonators, attenuators, modulators, etc.) needed for the complete
realization of the potential of this technology. In particular, fabrication
of the laser cavity, and the localized doping of the silicon to form
modulators and the lasers will require the integration of APM tech-
niques into the CMOS manufacturing process. (See Risser, Paper 39,

High Q, Resonant Microcavities
Optical microcavities are resonant devices into which photons can be
selectively stored or routed when certain resonant conditions are met.
The microcavity Q is a benchmark parameter which is directly related
to the photon storage time in the microcavity. Chip scale, microcavities
are effectively closed waveguide rings, into which, when resonant
conditions are met, photons can be coupled. Current chip scale,
microcavities are typically on the size of tens of microns in diameter.
With nominal Q values on the order of 1010, photons can be stored in
the microcavities for microsecond time scales and the photons will
travel an effective path length on the order of kilometers. Consequently,
large effective waveguide path lengths can be realized in very compact
geometries through resonant recirculation of the photons within the
microcavity. As cavity Q increases, the effective waveguide path length
increases. The Q values of current chip scale microcavities are limited
by material defects and sidewall roughness in the cavity surfaces.
Atomically precise fabrication would enable ultrahigh Q values through
defect free materials and atomically smooth sidewalls and enable
fabrication of microcavities with small mode volumes. High Q, chip
scale microcavities technology is currently being pursued to enable
compact technologies in the following fields:
• Sensors: photons are coupled into microcavities and sense
the environment through the evanescent wave. The higher
the Q, the longer the photon senses the environment
through the evanescent wave while circulating in the
resonator ring cavity. By functionalizing the surface of the
microcavity ring resonator these sensors can be configured
to selectively detect target molecules such as chem/bio
compounds to support defense, environmental, or medical
applications. Label free, single molecule bio detection has
been demonstrated using this approach by the Vahala
research group at Caltech.
• Compact, Low Threshold Lasers: the ratio of microcavity Q
to mode volume, V, is known as the Purcell factor (Q/V) and
directly related to the threshold levels required for lasing.
Through fabrication of ultrahigh Q cavities with small mode
volumes, very low threshold laser can be fabricated on chips.
The Vahala group at Caltech has demonstrated low
threshold level laser on a chip with toroidal resonator
microcavities. Higher Q values and smaller mode volumes
achieved through atomically precise fabrication would
reduce threshold lasing levels.

• Quantum Information Sciences: quantum networks and
node configurations are currently being pursued by a wide
variety of researchers which function through the strong
coherent interactions of light and matter, whereby
information stored in trapped atoms or quantum dots is
coupled to high Q microcavities for optical information
processing. Higher Q enables longer periods of strong
coherent interactions with trapped atoms for accurate
conversion of atomic logic to optical logic for information
processing.
• Optical Information Processing: small mode volume, high
Q microcavities reduce switching times and enhance non-
linear interactions, which are required to enable high speed,
all optical processing. Higher Q cavities would increase
switching speeds and data process rates. (See Oesterling,
Paper 38, Working Group Proceedings.)
Biological Sensors
Future sensor designs for biological monitoring and screening will need
to capitalize on the enormous amounts of information resulting from Effective chemical sensing
genome sequencing and systems biology related efforts. Effective capabilities require
approaches to screening for metabolic indicators, disease associated controlled specificity and
markers, or the activity of potential pharmaceutical reagents will be
sensitivity to an analyte
enabled by biosensor technologies. Increasing the speed and accuracy of
and the capability to
such measurements requires recognition of diverse chemical reagents.
transduce sensor
Related sensing capabilities for in situ biological monitoring will need to
information into a useful
integrate information assessment with an appropriate compensatory
response while being self-powered, self-healing and biologically format. Atomically precise
compatible. Such attributes will be essential for realizing in vivo sensors manufacturing is well
aimed at ameliorating the effects of disease or for the long-term positioned to meet this and
monitoring biological processes. Effective chemical sensing capabilities other challenges posed by
require controlled specificity and sensitivity to an analyte and the next generation sensing
capability to transduce sensor information into a useful format. formats.
Atomically precise manufacturing is well positioned to meet this and
other challenges posed by next generation sensing formats.
Examples of atomically precise manufacturing are displayed in

biological systems and serve as an inspiration for biosensor design.
Biopolymers, such as proteins, nucleic acids and carbohydrates, show
selective affinity to other biopolymers and small molecules through
careful positioning of chemical functional groups. Potentially, new
chemical recognition elements can be created by the atomically precise
arrangements to form ensembles of weak interactions that can
controllably recognize biomolecules. Such recognition elements are
essential for chemical sensing and for the in vivo targeting of

pharmaceuticals, image contrast agents or monitoring devices. The
design of molecular scale features is also critical for controlling
unwanted interactions, such as those associated with false positive
signals or biofouling.
The molecular scale basis of biosystem function dictates that similarly

Atomically precise sized, nanoscale materials will be effective in transducing signals
manufacturing may allow between biomolecules and sensing systems. Small-scale structures will
for direct electron transfer be necessary for entering cells and for interfacing to biological
between synthetic and complexity. The atomically precise manufacturing of such
natural structures, nanostructures will enable controlled self-assembly of sensing system
enabling new approaches components, allowing integration of different sensing elements and
for powering sensor diverse functions such as chemical recognition, information processing,
systems or for relaying signal transduction, and therapeutic response. Atomically precise
sensor information. design that bestows directed assembly would also be critical to the
construction of self-healing structures and for integrating approaches to
passively power sensor systems. For example, as is well recognized, the
controlled synthesis of nanomaterials can be exploited for tuning the
electrical or optical properties of materials. Atomically precise
manufacturing may allow for direct electron transfer between synthetic
and natural structures, enabling new approaches for powering sensor
systems or for relaying sensor information (personal communication
submitted by Mitch Doktycz, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.)
Electric Nanomotors and Nanoactuators

In 2003, the Zettl Group at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories and UC
Berkeley fabricated the smallest-known non-biological nanomotor. The
device employed a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWNT), which
served as both a bearing for the rotor and as an electrical conductor,
and had the following characteristics:
• Doped silicon substrate covered with 1 μm SiO2.
• Rotor, anchor pads, and electrodes—constructed
lithographically; 90 nm gold layer with 10 nm Cr adhesion
layer
• Rotor length 100 to 300 nm
• Bearing—MWNT, 10 to 40 nm diameter, 2 μm length
between anchor pads
• Torsional spring constant of the outer nanotube, 10-15 to 10-12
N-m “as produced;” however the researchers broke the
bonds with an electrical jolt (~80 V d.c.) torquing the rotor
and causing the tube to rotate freely

• Speed—operated at several Hz, but potentially could run at
gigahertz frequencies
• Vacuum—10-6 to 10-5 torr.
This breakthrough is highly relevant because motors based on this

concept could be used to drive systems of molecular mechanical
components. If the outer nanotube were fractured at the far ends rather
than right next to the rotor, then this motor-driven outer shaft could be
connected (e.g., by molecular gears) to other components. It’s
additionally significant because the operation of the motor is controlled
with electrical circuitry, offering precise control from the desktop. Most
importantly, the device is individually addressable from the desktop as
opposed to broadcast architectures where light or chemical signals
trigger operations on a large array of devices.
This research was additionally significant because in order to fabricate

this device new technologies were developed:
• A method for peeling off successive layers of nanotubes
• Precision cutting of, and selective damage to, nanotubes
• A manipulator capable of pulling out the inner nanotube in a
MWNT. This spawned a commercial product.
In 2005, the Zettl group constructed a molecular actuator able to

reversibly push apart two carbon nanotubes. Mobile atoms of indium Mechanical devices based
formed a nanocrystal ram between two nanotube electrodes under an on levers or plates
applied voltage. attached to the droplets or
• Variable distance between nanotubes, 0 to 150 nm nanocrystal ram could be
• Cross sectional area of nanocrystal, 36 nm2 used to convert electricity
into repetitive linear
• Force, 2.6 nN motion.
• Extension velocity, >1900 nm/s
• Power, 5 fW
• Power density, 20 MW/m3 to 8 GW/m3
Using similar methods, the size of liquid droplets of indium on a

nanotube surface could be controlled by varying the electrical current
through the nanotube. These droplets are capable of exerting pressure
in an oscillating manner (peak power, 20 μW, peak force 50 nN).
Mechanical devices based on levers or plates attached to the droplets or
nanocrystal ram could be used to convert electricity into repetitive
linear motion. Again, these devices are individually addressable. (See
Forrest et al., Paper 23, Working Group Proceedings.)

Photonic Nanomotors and Nanoactuators
Another class of nanomotors is that which can be controlled by photons
(light and magnetic fields). There are a considerable number of
examples of molecules that can be caused to rotate or change
conformation with photons. In the pathway to APM, nanosystems made
from these devices may be driven by arrays of motors performing
operations in parallel. A broadcast of electromagnetic radiation onto
the motors would provide energy for the array, which could be
controlled by modulating the frequency and amplitude of the radiation.
Nanocar. One of the most prominent examples of the application of this

technology is the Rice University Nanocar (and its evolving product line
of wheelbarrows and trucks). What distinguishes this effort is that a
Feringa motor, which powers the device, was successfully integrated
with other molecular structures to create a molecular machine. The
motor rotates and pushes a protruding molecular group against the
substrate propelling the molecular car forward along an atomically flat
surface under 365 nm wavelength light. While the utility of this
particular application may or may not lead to APM, it shows that a
Feringa motor (which had also been used to rotate glass rods on the
surface of a liquid crystal) can be connected to a device in order to effect
directed motion. One can envision alternative configurations such as
Feringa motors pushing against gear teeth to rotate a shaft, or provide
linear motion as in a rack and pinion.
Molecular valve. In another example, in 2005 researchers at the

Biomade Technology Foundation and the University of Groningen
developed a molecular valve controlled by light. To do this, they
modified a protein found in e. coli bacteria that in nature serves as a
safety valve for excessive pressure in the cell. The modifications allow it
to be opened by UV light (366 nm wavelength, applied for about 2
minutes) and closed by visible light (>460 nm, for about 2 seconds) by
building up and releasing localized charge. The valve operates within a
lipid bilayer, is about 10 nm in external diameter, 21 nm long, and has
an internal pore size of 3 nm when open. When the valve is closed it
resists being forced open under pressure to nearly the breaking point of
the cell wall. Although the valve has been developed and tested in an
open system—embedded in the lipid bilayer of a cell wall, or more
accurately, a patch clamp to measure current within this environment—
one can envision fluid channels (pipes) leading to and from the valve in
order to have it regulate fluid or gas transport in a closed system. (See
Forrest et al., Paper 23, Working Group Proceedings.)

Carbon Nanotubes
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have been at the forefront of
novel nanoscale investigations due to their unique structure-dependent
electronic and mechanical properties. They are thought to have a host
of wide-ranging, potential applications including as catalyst supports in
heterogeneous catalysis, field emitters, high strength engineering fibers,
sensors, actuators, tips for scanning probe microscopy, gas storage
media, and as molecular wires for the next generation of electronics
devices. The combination of the helicity and diameter of SWNTs,
defined by the roll-up vector, determines whether a tube is a metal or a
semiconductor. Moreover, the mechanical strength of a tube is a
function of its length and diameter. SWNTs have been synthesized in
our lab, in gram quantities, by means of a chemical vapor deposition
process although other methods including arc discharge and laser
vaporization exist for generating these materials. Indeed, the advantage
of SWNTs is that they are chemically, molecularly defined structures
with reproducible dimensions.
Many applications utilizing SWNTs require chemical modification of The advantage of single-
the carbon nanotubes to make them more amenable to rational and walled carbon nanotubes
predictable manipulation. For example, the generation of high strength (SWNTs) is that they are
fibers is associated with the individualization of nanotubes and their chemically, molecularly
subsequent dispersion into a polymer matrix. Moreover, the require- defined structures with
ments of load-transfer efficiency demand that nanotube surfaces should reproducible dimensions.
be compatible with the host matrix. Secondly, sensor applications
involve the tethering onto nanotube surfaces of chemical moieties with
specific recognition sites for analytes with ensuing triggering of a
predictable response in the nanotube’s optical or transport properties.
Thirdly, gas storage and lithium intercalation applications necessitate
the opening of hollow cavities in nanotube sidewalls. To fulfill all of
these varied stipulations at the nanoscale requires an intimate and
precise understanding of the chemistry and functionality of carbon
nanotubes, such as would be offered by atomically precise
manufacturing.
The main problem with the majority of popular synthetic methods for
growing SWNTs (i.e., laser ablation, arc-discharge, and chemical vapor
deposition) is that they produce samples yielding a mixture of many
different diameters and chiralities of nanotubes that are moreover
contaminated with metallic and amorphous impurities. Thus, post-
synthesis chemical processing protocols, that purify tubes and that can
also separate individual tubes according to diameter and chirality by
taking advantage of their intrinsically differential reactivity, are often
the only viable routes towards rational and predictable manipulation of
the favorable electronic and mechanical properties of these materials.

APM would certainly be viewed as an alternative route towards
practically achieving these goals.
From a fundamental scientific perspective, chemical functionalization

and APM allow for the exploration of the intrinsic molecular nature of
these SWNTs and permit studies at the rich, structural interface
between true molecules and bulk materials. In general, chemical
modification strategies have targeted SWNT defects, end caps,
sidewalls, as well as the hollow interior. APM would allow for an even
more highly focused chemical targeting of nanomaterials.
Representative approaches to nanotube derivatization include covalent
chemistry of conjugated double bonds within the SWNT, non-covalent
π-stacking, covalent interactions at dangling functionalities at nanotube
ends and defects, and wrapping of macromolecules. Chemical
functionalization of SWNTs attached to conventional atomic force
microscopy probes has also been demonstrated as a methodology of
yielding high-resolution, chemically-sensitive images on samples
containing multiple chemical domains. In this last case,
functionalization can be spatially localized at nanotube ends, often
involving only a few molecules.
Thus, rational SWNT functionalization as well as APM provide for the

possibility of the manipulation of SWNT properties in a predictive
manner. The surface chemistry of SWNTs plays a vital role in enabling
the dispersability, purification, solubilization, diameter and chirality-
based separation, and biocompatibility of these unique nanostructures.
In addition, derivatization allows for a number of site-selective
nanochemistry applications such as the self-assembly of nanotubes with
tailorable electronic properties, important for advances in molecular
electronics. Other derivatized SWNT adducts show potential as
catalytic supports and as biological transport vessels. Moreover, these
systems often demonstrate novel charge transfer characteristics, the
development and understanding of which have implications for
photocatalysis and energy storage. Finally, rational chemical
manipulation of SWNTs is critical for the hierarchical build-up of these
nanomaterials into functional architectures, such as nanocomposites
and nanocircuits, with unique properties.
Opportunities to research and design atomically precise catalysts and

atomically precise manufacturing of carbon nanotubes will gain
momentum as the demand for high quality and pure carbon nanotubes
grows for energy, electronics, transportation materials, military and
medical applications continues to grow. (See Wong, Paper 18; Fifield,
Paper 17; and Heintz, Paper 37, Working Group Proceedings.)

Opportunities for Atomically Precise Technology
Advancements in Medicine
Nano-Devices, Nano-Biosensors, NEMS, Nano-Tube, and

Nano-Wire for Biological Application
Nanomaterials are exquisitely sensitive chemical and biological sensors.
Nanosensors with immobilized bioreceptor probes that are selective for
target analyte molecules are called nanobiosensors. They can be
integrated into other technologies such as lab-on-a-chip to facilitate
molecular diagnostics. Their applications include detection of
microorganisms in various samples, monitoring of metabolites in body
fluids and detection of tissue pathology such as cancer. The
nanomaterials transduce the chemical binding event on their surface
into a change in conductance of the nanowire in an extremely sensitive,
real time and quantitative fashion. Boron-doped silicon nanowires
(SiNWs) have been used to create highly sensitive, real-time electrically
based sensors for biological and chemical species. The small size and
capability of these semiconductor nanowires for sensitive, label-free,
real-time detection of a wide range of chemical and biological species
could be exploited in array-based screening and in vivo diagnostics.
Nanowires and nanotubes carry charge and excitons efficiently, and are
therefore potentially ideal building blocks for nanoscale electronics and Nanowires and nanotubes
optoelectronics. Carbon nanotubes have already been exploited in carry charge and excitons
devices such as field-effect and single electron transistors, but the efficiently, and are there-
practical utility of nanotube components for building electronic circuits fore potentially ideal
is limited, as it is not yet possible to selectively grow semiconducting or building blocks for nano-
metallic nanotubes. The electrical properties of the assembly of scale electronics and
functional nanoscale devices are controlled by selective doping. (See optoelectronics.
Wei, Paper 29, Working Group Proceedings.)
Diagnostic Nanomedicine for Cellular and

Organ Imaging in Living Cells and Living Animal.
Nanomolecular diagnostics is the use of nanobiotechnology in
molecular diagnostics. Nanotechnology is the creation and utilization of
materials, devices, and systems through the control of matter on the
nanometer (1 billionth of a meter)-length scale. Numerous nanodevices
and nanosystems for sequencing single molecules of DNA are feasible.
Given the inherent nanoscale of receptors, pores, and other functional
components of living cells, the detailed monitoring and analysis of these
components will be made possible by the development of a new class of
nanoscale probes. Nanobiotechnologies are clinically relevant and have
the potential to be incorporated in clinical laboratory diagnosis.

Nanotechnologies enable the diagnosis at single cell and molecule level
and some of these can be incorporated in the current molecular
The most important diagnostics such as biochips. Besides following techniques,
current applications are nanoparticles, such as gold nanoparticles and quantum dots, are the
foreseen in the areas of most widely used. The nanotechnology-based chips on a nanoscale are
biomarker research, cancer related to nanomanipulation. The droplets used are 1 billion times
diagnosis, and detection of smaller in volume than has been demonstrated by conventional
infectious microorganisms. methods. The levitated particles can be manipulated and positioned
with accuracy within a range up to 300 nm. Use of this technology on a
lab-on-a-chip would refine the examination of fluid droplets containing
trace chemicals and viruses. As such, these technologies will extend the
limits of current molecular diagnostics and enable point-of-care
diagnosis as well as the development of personalized medicine.
Although the potential diagnostic applications are unlimited, most
important current applications are foreseen in the areas of biomarker
research, cancer diagnosis, and detection of infectious microorganisms.
(See Wei, Paper 29, Working Group Proceedings.)
Genetic Nanomedicine for Gene Detection and Gene Delivery

Gene delivery is an area of considerable current interest; genetic
materials (DNA, RNA, and oligonucleotides) have been used as
molecular medicine and are delivered to specific cell types to either
inhibit some undesirable gene expression or express therapeutic
proteins. To date, the majority of gene therapy systems are based on
viral vectors delivered by injection to the sites where the therapeutic
effect is desired. Viral gene-transfer techniques can deliver a specific
gene to the nucleus of a cell, for expression, through integration into the
geneome or as episomal vectors. Viral vectors can have potentially
dangerous side effects due to unintended integration of the viral DNA
into the host genome which include incorporation of the virus into the
hosts immune system and hence, have been less successful than
originally hoped. Liposome based gene transfer has relatively low
transfection rates, are difficult to produce in a specific size range, can be
unstable in the blood stream, and are difficult to target to specific
tissues. Injection of naked DNA, RNA, and modified RNA directly into
the blood stream leads to clearance of the injected nucleic acids with
minimal beneficial outcome.
The use of non-viral vectors, because of their non-immunogenicity and

easy production, represents a good alternative to viral vectors, however,
most non-viral vectors have lacked the high transfection efficiency
obtained with viral vectors. As such, there is currently a need for a gene
delivery system that has minimal side effects but high potency and
efficiency. The idea that nanosystems have unique physical and
biological properties that might be used to overcome the problems of

gene and drug delivery has gained interest in recent years. Nanosystems
can be designed with different compositions and biological properties.
Some of these systems, such as nanoparticles, dendrimers, nanocages,
micelles, molecular conjugates, liposomes and so on, have been
extensively investigated for drug and gene delivery applications. One
such system could be that of the self-assembled nanoparticles coated
with targeting biomolecules. It uses a nanoparticle platform for
diagnostic probes and effective targeted therapy. (See Wei, Paper 29,
Nanotechnology-Based Regenerative Medicine:

Cell Sheet Engineering
By combining preformed biodegradable polymer scaffolds and specific
cell types, various tissues including cartilage, bone, and blood vessels
have been reconstructed, although, so far, therapeutic use has been very
limited. A method to circumvent the need for the traditional technology
is “cell sheet engineering” which utilizes temperature-responsive culture
surfaces. These novel surfaces are created by the covalent grafting of the
temperature-responsive polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) by
electron beam irradiation. The grafted polymer thickness and density
are precisely regulated in a nanometer regime. These surfaces allow for
the non-invasive harvest of cells by simple temperature reduction.
Confluent cells are non-invasively harvested as single, contiguous cell
sheets with intact cell-cell junctions and deposited extracellular matrix
from the surfaces. These harvested cell sheets have been used for
various tissue reconstructions, including ocular surfaces, periodontal
ligaments, cardiac patches, esophagus, liver, and various other tissues.
(See Wei, Paper 29, Working Group Proceedings.)
Oncology Nanomedicine for Early Diagnosis and Early

Treatment in Cancer
Targeting and local tumor delivery is the key challenges in both
diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Cancer therapies are based on a Nanobiotechnology is
better understanding of the disease at the molecular level. Nano- being used to refine
biotechnology is being used to refine discovery of biomarkers, discovery of biomarkers,
molecular diagnostics, drug discovery, and drug delivery, which are
molecular diagnostics,
important basic components of personalized medicine and are
drug discovery, and drug
applicable to management of cancer as well. Examples are given of the
delivery
application of quantum dots, gold nanoparticles, and molecular imaging
in diagnostics and combination with therapeutics—another important
feature of personalized medicine. Management of cancer, facilitated by
nanobiotechnology, is expected to enable early detection of cancer, and
more effective and less toxic treatment, increasing the chances of cure.

Nanotechnology is an emerging interdisciplinary field dedicated to the
manipulations of atoms and molecules that lead to the construction of
structures in the nanometer scale size range that retain unique
properties. Emerging BioMicroNano-technologies have the potential to
provide accurate, realtime, high-throughput screening of tumor cells
without the need for time-consuming sample preparation. These rapid,
nano-optical techniques may play an important role in advancing early
detection, diagnosis, and treatment of disease. Recently, many
nanotechnology tools have become available which can make it possible
for clinicians to detect tumors at an early stage. The nanostructures can
potentially enter the single tumor cell, which can help improve the
current detection limit by imaging techniques. Gourley shows that laser
scanning confocal microscopy can be used to identify a previously
unknown property of certain cancer cells that distinguishes them, with
single-cell resolution, from closely related normal cells. This property is
the correlation of light scattering and the spatial organization of
mitochondria. In addition, the new technology of nanolaser
spectroscopy using the biocavity laser can be used to characterize the
unique spectral signatures of normal and transformed cells. These
optical methods represent powerful new tools that hold promise for
detecting cancer at an early stage and may help to limit delays in
diagnosis and treatment. Nanotechnology can help diagnose cancer
using dendrimers and kill tumor cells without harming normal healthy
cells by tumor selective delivery of genes using nanovectors. These and
other technologies currently are in various stages of discovery and
development. (See Wei, Paper 29, Working Group Proceedings.)
Pharmacological Nanomedicine for

Drug Delivery and Drug Design
The application of nanotechnology in life sciences is becoming hot topic
on drug design and drug delivery. The nanotechnologies, including
nanoparticles and nanodevices such as nanobiosensors and
nanobiochips, are used to improve drug discovery and development.
Nanoscale assays can contribute significantly to cost-saving in screening
campaigns. Many drugs discovered in the past could not be used in
patients because a suitable method of drug delivery was lacking.
Nanotechnology is also used to facilitate drug delivery. A product
incorporating the NanoCrystal technology of Elan Drug Delivery (King
of Prussia, PA, USA), a solid-dose formulation of the
immunosuppressant sirolimus, was approved by the FDA in 2000.
Abraxane™ (Abraxis™ Oncology), containing paclitaxel as albumin-
bound particles in an injectable suspension, is approved for the
treatment of breast cancer after the failure of combination
chemotherapy for metastatic disease or after relapse within six months
of adjuvant chemotherapy. It is based on nanoparticle technology,

which integrates biocompatible proteins with drugs to create the
nanoparticle form of the drug (with a size 100 to 200 nm) to
overcome the insolubility problems encountered with paclitaxel. Now,
the trend is to consider drug-delivery issues at the earlier stages of drug
discovery and design. Potential applications of nanotechnology to
facilitate drug delivery can be taken into consideration at the stage of
drug design. A carrier nanoparticle can be designed simultaneously with
the therapeutic molecule. Although there might be some safety
concerns with respect to the in vivo use of nanoparticles, studies are in
place to determine the nature and extent of adverse events. Future
prospects for the application of nanotechnology in healthcare and for
the development of personalized medicine appear to be excellent. (See
Dendrimer-Based Nanomedicine: Its Impact on Biology,

Pharma Delivery, and Polyvalent/Targeted Therapies
Dendrimers are now referred to as “artificial proteins” based on the
close scaling/mimicry of their dimensions, shapes and surface
chemistries to these biological nanostructures. Considering the
importance of nanoscale structures, dimensions associated with
proteins, DNA, antibody-antigen complexes, viral particles, to mention
a few, it is safe to make the following statement: “The positive
management of human health, disease and longevity will likely be
determined/controlled by a deeper understanding of critical parameters
in the nano-length scale; namely: nanomedicine.” This theme will be
used to present the use of precise, synthetic nanostructures (i.e.,
dendrimers) as critical nanoscale building blocks in a variety of nano-
diagnostic, drug delivery and nano-pharma-type applications.
Dendrimers are routinely synthesized as tunable nanostructures that

may be designed and regulated as a function of their size, shape, surface Dendrimers are obtained
chemistry and interior void space. They are obtained with structural with structural control
control approaching that of traditional biomacromolecules such as approaching that of
DNA/RNA or proteins and are distinguished by their precise nanoscale traditional biomacro-
scaffolding and nanocontainer properties. These important properties molecules such as DNA/
are expected to play an important role in the emerging field of the RNA or proteins and are
nanomedicine. Recent efforts have focused on the synthesis and distinguished by their
preclinical evaluation of multipurpose dendrimer prototype precise nanoscale
STARBURST PAMAM (polyamidoamine) that exhibits properties scaffolding and nano-
suitable for use as: (i) targeted, diagnostic MRI/NIR (near-IR) contrast container properties.
agents, (ii) and/or for controlled delivery of cancer therapies. This
dendritic nanostructure (~5.0 nm in diameter) was selected on the basis
of a very favorable biocompatibility profile, the expectation that it will
exhibit desirable mammalian kidney excretion properties and

demonstrated targeting features. (See Wei, Paper 29, Working Group
Proceedings.)
Cardiovascular Nanomedicine for

Heart and Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in the United
The future of States: One out of every four Americans has cardiovascular disease and
cardiovascular diagnosis every 30 seconds one person dies form heart disease. Although
already is being impacted
significant advances have been made in the management and treatment
of this disease, the effectiveness of early detection and treatment in
by nanosystems that can
preventing heart attacks is still questionable, since few of the heart
be both diagnose pathology
attacks could be predicted by the physicians. One of the fundamental
and treat it with targeted
and unresolved problems in cardiovascular biology is the in vivo
delivery systems.
detection of atherosclerotic disease and the evaluation of
atherosclerotic disease activity. Current technology limits clinicians to
diagnostic techniques that either image or functionally assess the
significance of large obstructive vascular lesions. Techniques have been
developed recently to achieve molecular and cellular imaging with most
imaging modalities, including nuclear, optical, ultrasound, and
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, current imaging
modalities do not allow for the possibility of imaging atherosclerotic
disease at its earliest stages nor do available techniques allow routine
assessment of atherosclerotic lesions susceptible to rupture and/or
thrombosis. This is of particular clinical significance given that
myocardial infarctions and other sequela of atherosclerotic disease are
just as likely to occur from small non-obstructive coronary artery
disease based on the degree of luminal obstruction is fundamentally
flawed. Newer technologies must be developed that are capable of
identifying earlier atherosclerotic lesions as well as atherosclerotic
lesions that are active or unstable. The role of nanotechnology in
cardiovascular diagnosis is expanding rapidly. It has been applied
nanosystems to the area of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular
biology. The technologies for producing targeted nanosystems are
multifarious and reflect end uses in many cases. The results to date
indicate rapid growth of interest and capability in the field. The future
of cardiovascular diagnosis already is being impacted by nanosystems
that can be both diagnose pathology and treat it with targeted delivery
systems. To date, both advanced imaging methods and new targeted
nanoparticles contrast agents for early characterization of
atherosclerosis and cardiovascular pathology at the cellular and
molecular levels that might represent the next frontier for combining
imaging and rational drug delivery to facilitate personalized medicine.
The rapid growth of nanotechnology and nanoscience could greatly
expand the clinical opportunities for molecular imaging. (See Wei,
Paper 29, Working Group Proceedings.)

Neurological Nanomedicine for Neuroscience Research
Applications of nanotechnology in basic neuroscience include those
that investigate molecular, cellular and physiological processes
including three specific areas. First, nanoengineered materials and
approaches for promoting neuronal adhesion and growth to understand
the underlying neurobiology of these processes or to support other
technologies designed to interact with neurons in vivo (for example,
coating of recording or stimulating electrodes). Second, nanoengineered
materials and approaches for directly interacting, recording and/or
stimulating neurons at a molecular level. Third, imaging applications
using nanotechnology tools, in particular, those that focus on
chemically functionalized semiconductor quantum dots. Applications
of nanotechnology in clinical neuroscience include research aimed at
limiting and reversing neuropathological disease states. Nano-
technology approaches are designed to support and/or promote the
functional regeneration of the nervous system; neuroprotective Nanotechnology
strategies, in particular those that use fullerene derivatives; and approaches are designed to
nanotechnology approaches that facilitate the delivery of drugs and support and/or promote
small molecules across the blood-brain barrier. Applications of the functional regeneration
nanotechnologies for neuroprotection have focused on limiting the of the nervous system;
damaging effects of free radicals generated after injury, which is a key neuroprotective strategies,
neuropathological process that contributes to CNS ischaemia, trauma in particular those that
and degenerative disorders. (See Wei, Paper 29, Working Group use fullerene derivatives;
Proceedings.) and nanotechnology
approaches that facilitate
Dermatological Nanomedicine for Skin Research the delivery of drugs and
small molecules across the
Several nanoparticles are used in molecular imaging: gold nanoparticles,
BBB.
quantum dots and magnetic nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles are
particularly good labels for sensors because a variety of analytical
techniques can be used to detect them, including optical absorption,
fluorescence, Raman scattering, atomic and magnetic force, and
electrical conductivity. This technique can be used to detect
microorganisms and could replace PCR and fluorescent tags used
currently. Quantum dots (QDs) are nanoscale crystals of semiconductor
material that glow, or fluoresce when excited by a light source such as a
laser. QDs have fairly broad excitation spectra–from ultraviolet to red–
that can be tuned depending on their size and composition. At the same
time, QDs have narrow emission spectra, making it possible to resolve
the emissions of different nanoparticles simultaneously and with
minimal overlap. QDs are highly resistant to degradation, and their
fluorescence is remarkably stable. Bound to a suitable antibody,
magnetic nanoparticles are used to label specific molecules, structures,
or microorganisms. Magnetic immunoassay techniques have been
developed in which the magnetic field generated by the magnetically

labeled targets is detected directly with a sensitive magnetometer. (See

Agenda for Research and Call to Action
The final report of the 2006 Congressionally-mandated review of the
U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative by the National Research
Council of the National Academies and the National Materials Advisory
Board includes an evaluation of prospects for molecular manufacturing
based on what are here termed advanced-generation productive
nanosystems. The executive summary of the review closes with a call for
research in this area: Experimentation leading to demonstrations
supplying ground truth for abstract models is appropriate to better
characterize the potential for use of bottom-up or molecular
manufacturing systems that utilize processes more complex than self-
assembly. The present section includes recommendations that are
responsive to this call.
The following topics for research should be addressed in order to

promote the development of atomically precise manufacturing, Experimentation leading
productive nanosystems, and their applications. This list is, of course,
to demonstrations
far from exhaustive, and reflects ideas that will evolve over time. Any
supplying ground truth for
agenda for research in this area must be revisited regularly.
abstract models is
In this section, little effort will be made to motivate our choices. The appropriate to better
reader only has to refer to other sections of the roadmap to understand characterize the potential
why we list these research topics. We will make an effort to suggest in for use of bottom-up or
broad terms what path to APM and productive nanosystems, or what molecular manufacturing
enabled product or application would benefit from the research. systems that utilize
processes more complex
We recommend a useful (necessary but not sufficient) test with respect than self-assembly.
to topics that should be included or excluded from this list: If the goal of
the technical challenge does not propose to lead to the fabrication of
structures with atomic or molecular precision, or if it does not explore
the application of atomically or molecularly precise structures then it
may be worthwhile, but it should not be on the productive nanosystem
roadmap. To achieve molecular or atomic precision, an approach must
manipulate and exploit the quantized nature of matter.
Roadmapping and Data Integration

Knowledge, instrumentation, modeling, techniques, and components
do not by themselves add up to functional engineering systems. This
requires the design of system architectures, division of systems into
subsystems, and the development of components that meet functional
requirements determined by their context in a system as a whole. These
functional requirements then set a detailed agenda for research.
Nanotechnology Roadmap Agenda for Research 45

The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) is a
premier example of this process operating at the level of an industry as a
whole. In an ongoing process, R&D leaders from across the semi-
conductor industry pool their knowledge to set concrete objectives for
next-generation semiconductor manufacturing, to determine their
requirements, and to identify and evaluate options for satisfying those
requirements. This process ensures that all of the many necessary
technologies will be available together. If any were missing, the rest
would be of little use. Coordination gives all participants the confidence
necessary to invest in equipment that must work together with
equipment that does not yet exist — the light sources, etching
equipment, positioning mechanisms, test equipment, design software,
and so on.
The ITRS process does more than this: it looks ahead not one, but
several technology generations, helping to guide the research that will
To develop complex create the options for developing the equipment that will implement
systems, efforts must be the digital electronic systems that will revolutionize the world a decade
coordinated so as to
hence. This has been an essential part of the first industry to build
complex, integrated nanosystems. In this way, the ITRS process has
develop all the parts they
transformed our lives.
require. This entails
selecting and refining We cannot hope to match the ITRS achievement today, in part because
objectives, determining of the exploratory nature of this initial roadmap, and in part because of
requirements, considering the greater diversity and earlier stage of APT, APM, and their
options for meeting them, applications. The principle, however, is the same: To develop complex
and thereby identifying systems, efforts must be coordinated so as to develop all the parts they
research directions that require. This entails selecting and refining objectives, determining
are more likely to produce requirements, considering options for meeting them, and thereby
results of great value. identifying research directions that are more likely to produce results of
great value.
The results will always be imperfect, but it is better to try than do

nothing. A vital part of the research agenda is to develop a better
research agenda, and we see this as an ongoing process in which
roadmapping will play a vital role.
Modeling, Design, and Data Integration

The demands of science and technology have driven vigorous
development of a wide range of techniques for modeling atomically
precise systems. Recognition of the promise of APT and APM adds a
driver for this many aspects of this work, but it appears that this calls
for little change in its overall direction.
46 Agenda for Research Nanotechnology Roadmap

Outside of APM and productive nanosystems there is a well
documented need and ongoing effort to develop techniques that model
materials and structures at the atomic and molecular level. These efforts
have and will facilitate developments in AP nanotechnologies, and will
play a major role in the development of APM processes and productive
nanosystems. The promise of these developments calls for greater
investment in applicable modeling techniques, with an increased
emphasis on multilevel, multiphysics modeling that can support the
design of larger and more complex systems. Present computational
modeling techniques are broadly adequate for progress today, but
improved techniques will be of substantial value.
Design software for APT and APM will draw on progress in the
modeling community, but it presents distinct challenges that are not yet
receiving sufficient attention. This is understandable because APM is in
its infancy, and design software will necessarily be technology and
material dependent. However, as APM techniques advance, design
software will be an important and increasingly necessary enabling tool.
This is an area that calls for new initiatives with the objective of
developing and improving software that supports systematic design Greater investment is
methodologies.Without sufficient investment, design software would needed in applicable
become a bottleneck in developing AP nanosystems. modeling techniques, with
an increased emphasis on
Modeling and experimentation add to a store of knowledge regarding multilevel, multiphysics
AP structures and processes. This knowledge, together with modeling, modeling that can support
will inform the design process for AP nanosystems. Today, much of that the design of larger and
knowledge is dispersed and, in effect, inaccessible to designers. It more complex systems.
resides in a host of different journals and databases, and it is not
indexed in a manner that makes it useful for design.
Designers would be greatly helped by compilations of suitably organized

data relevant to nanosystems engineering. This calls for classifying and
indexing data about materials, building blocks, devices, and processes
according to criteria and metrics that describe their functional
properties. Compilations of this kind will help designers find solutions
to problems, and will help them reject unworkable options. Compila-
tions organized around functional criteria and metrics can cut across
the disciplinary barriers that now impede the flow of practical
knowledge and thus can leverage the value of both past and future
research. Collecting and organizing knowledge to support nanosystems
engineering deserves a high priority.
Characterization
All manufacturing processes depend on inspection and metrology to
control the manufacturing process. The current analytical characteriza-

tion, inspection, and metrology tools are not yet capable of sustaining
scanning-probe directed APM. However, excellent progress has been
made in the resolution and capabilities of these tools. While the needs
of current manufacturing processes such as the semiconductor
industry, and scientific research in general will continue to develop
these technologies, the needs of APM would justify accelerated
development of characterization, inspection, and metrology tools. The
complete list of techniques and tools would be beyond the scope of this
section. Some obvious candidates for consideration are listed below:
• Transmission electron microscopy
• Atom probes
• Scattering/Diffraction methods
• Scanning probes
• He beam microscopy.
Next-generation fabrication methods based on self-assembly will be

outgrowths of existing methods involving biomolecules, synthetic
molecules, and nanoscale particles, fibers, and so forth. These can draw
on the well-established methods for macromolecular characterization
that have been the basis for today’s extensive knowledge of the
productive nanosystems and other molecular machinery found in
biology.
Early-generation APPNs are expected to roughly parallel ribosomes and

DNA polymerases in scale and complexity. Current methods are now
able to provide atomically precise characterization of these structures,
though this remains a challenge at such a large scale (hundreds of
thousands of atoms). Current million-atom class AP nanostructures are
based on structural DNA technology that exploits the recent “origami”
technology, and atomically detailed structural knowledge of these
products derives largely from knowledge of their nanometer scale
geometries combined with knowledge of smaller-scale of the same kind.
Characterization of their nanometer scale geometries has proved to be
the bottleneck: The premier technique today is cryoelectron
tomography, but the necessary instruments are rare today and in great
demand. A dedicated user facility for this purpose would speed
progress, as would improvements in automation of the technique.
Overall, characterization methods in this area appear adequate to

support progress and are already advancing to serve demand from other
areas of molecular science and technology. However, the development
of a wide range of AP can benefit greatly from faster, lower-cost
methods for atomically precise characterization of macromolecular
objects. The time required for this is often the rate-limiting step in the

cycle of design, fabrication, characterization, and redesign or use. The
promise of AP systems and productive nanosystems therefore adds
urgency to the demand for improvements.
Fabrication Methods and Enablers

AP fabrication and assembly methods are often divided into top-down
(directed by scanning probe tips) and bottom-up (directed by AP self-
assembly of complementary interfaces) methods, but with a gray area
between. Because of the many overlaps in the technical challenges for
these fabrication approaches, however, those listed below are not
categorized in these terms.
Atomically Precise Tools

• Stable, reproducible, atomically precise scanning tunneling
microscope tips with atomic resolution imaging capabilities.
• Atomically precise tool tips designed to capture atoms,
molecules, or other building blocks in precise, reliable
configurations, and to transfer them to other structures
through a precise, reliable operation.
• Smart tool tips that are able to sense whether a building
block has been captured by the tip and when it transfers from
the tip to the desired location.
• AP stamps, molds, and nanoimprint templates that enable
parallel passivation/depassivation operations.
• Closed-loop nanopositioning systems with resolution < 0.1
nm and 3 or more degrees of freedom, and small-footprint
systems to implement array-based parallelism.
Atomic Resolution Processes

• Technical improvements in atomic layer epitaxy and atomic
layer deposition.
• Multi-material patterned atomic layer epitaxy.
• Methods to accommodate lattice mismatch in
heteroepitaxial 3D structures.
• Highly selective depassivation of surfaces (in support of
multi-material ALE).
• Highly selective and layer-by-layer etches (removal of
sacrificial layers deposited by multi-material ALE).
• Robust protection layers to preserve the atomic precision of
the output of APM.

• Deprotection-based AP mechanosynthesis methods (for
example, by tip-directed H depassivation of atomic sites on
Si surfaces to direct subsequent growth steps).
• AP functionalization of surfaces.
• In situ generation and separation of radicals for atomic
resolution processing.
• Atomic defect inspection.
• Atomic defect repair (adding and removing atoms).
• Atomic resolution etching.
• Additive covalent mechanosynthesis methods (direct, AP
placement and bonding of reactive molecules and molecular
fragments).
• Additive non-covalent mechanosynthesis methods (direct,
AP placement of building blocks that self-align and bind
non-covalently).
• Ribosome-like mechanosynthesis of AP polymers that
subsequently fold or bind to form AP polymeric objects.
• Binding sites for collecting feedstock molecules and building
blocks used in mechanosynthesis.
• All of the above in liquid phase.
Atomically Precise Components and Building Blocks

• Catalogues of atomically precise building blocks (organic or
inorganic, natural or synthetic) organized by functional
properties.
• Improved processes for the production and purification of
these building blocks.
• Building blocks fabricated by atomically precise top down
method.
• Self-aligning building blocks that enable AP results from
less-than-AP positional control during assembly.
• Monomeric building blocks for ribosome-like
mechanosynthesis of AP polymers (that can subsequently
fold or bind to form AP polymeric objects).
• Monomeric building blocks for mechanosynthesis of highly
cross-linked AP structures.
• Lower-cost production of DNA through bioengineering to
exploit and improve the utility of DNA-secreting bacteria.

• Improved design software for folded protein structures, and
for new classes of folding polymers based on new monomeric
building blocks.
Modular Molecular Composite Nanosystems (MMCNs)

• Capabilities for engineering proteins with AP binding to
DNA frameworks and functional components
• Extension to a wider range of structures of the recent
“origami” technology for building configurable, 3D, million-
atom-scale DNA frameworks.
• Exploiting the dense arrays of distinct, addressable, AP
binding sites generated by DNA-based structures to organize
3D patterns of non-DNA components.
• Developments that exploit and extend the enormous set of
DNA-like, DNA-binding polymers to expand the functional
repertoire of structural DNA nanotechnologies.
• Developments in protein engineering to produce a wider
range of functional, relatively rigid AP polymer objects with
greater reliability.
• Systematic methodologies for building MMCNs in which
proteins bind specific functional components to specific sites
on DNA structural frameworks, for example, by exploiting
zinc-finger based proteins with sequence-specific binding.
• Theoretical and experimental on applications that can
exploit systems with large numbers of distinct, functional
nanostructures organized in 3D patterns on a 100 nm scale.
• Means to interface MMCNs with nanostructured substrates
patterned by tip-directed AP fabrication and by non-AP
nanolithography.
Structures, Devices, and Systems

AP systems will require a range of components with functional
properties as diverse as their applications, and each application area will
generate its own agenda for research. These agendas will overlap in
requiring a range of core capabilities, many of which are also enablers
for APM systems in general, and for productive nanosystems in
particular.
Because tasks and functions at the often parallel those at the macro-
scale, the required components and devices likewise are often parallel.
Structural frameworks require components like beams, plates, and rods,

and require means for attaching one to another. Mechanical systems
require components like bearings, joints, shafts, and motors. Electrical
systems will commonly use wires, insulators, capacitors, and switches.
Indeed, all these are found in existing nanosystems, either in biology or
in digital electronics.
Physical phenomena important at the nanoscale (tunneling, thermal

fluctuations, short-range attractive forces, etc.) will often make an
enormous difference in the implementation and operation of nanoscale
AP systems, and will present fresh challenges and opportunities. Design,
modeling, and experimentation all can contribute to expanding our
understanding and capabilities in this area, and systematic exploration
of nanoscale versions of familiar elements of macroscale systems will be
of great value.
In this pursuit, however, it will be vital to apply engineering criteria and

metrics to evaluate merit. To be a genuine motor, for example, a device
must be able to deliver power to something else (a criterion), and it can
Design, modeling, and
be judged by metrics such as its speed, torque, and efficiency. Similarly,
experimentation all can
be a genuine logic gate, a device must be able to function as part of a
contribute to expanding network of devices that forms a digital system (a criterion), and it can be
our understanding and judged by metrics such as its switching speed, energy dissipation, and
capabilities in this area, noise margins.
and systematic exploration
of nanoscale versions of Development of Scanning-Probe Based APM Systems
familiar elements of
macroscale systems will be In addition to the component-level and process-level research
of great value. challenges described above, the realization of scanning-probe based
APM systems will require system-level development work.
The passive systems required for APM, such as mechanical framework,

power distribution, information distribution, etc., must be designed, but
are largely straightforward adaptations of existing technology and may
be constructed with existing toolsets. We will not list passive system
requirements for APM.
The active systems for APM are also within the grasp of existing
technology but will be operating in regimes where production
manufacturing tools have not yet tread and will require challenging
system integration, especially when scaling up to higher levels of
throughput through parallelism and higher-frequency operations.
While the nanopositioning system will not require atomically precise

components, it will require the integration of the atomically precise tool
or tools that implement the fabrication operations. Research objectives
for these tools are discussed above. It should be noted, however, that
developments in this area will also be applicable to advanced-generation

APPNs, which are anticipated to perform similar operations by means
of nanoscale positioning mechanisms. Thus, tip-directed processes
studied and developed for scanning-probe based APM systems can also
be viewed as exploratory research for advanced-generation APPNs.
Designing the system architecture for a particular APM technology will

set the requirements for its passive and active systems. We believe some
of the nearer term areas of useful research for active systems for APM
will include:
• Microscale nanopositioning systems used to carry out the
spatially addressed atomically precise fabrication technique
to be implemented, such as deprotection-based or additive
mechanosynthesis.
• Power and information distribution systems to control arrays
To extend the scope of
of microscale nanopositioning fabrication systems.
APM based on productive
• A global alignment and nanopositioning system to control nanosystems, a natural
the position of an array of fabrication units relative to a direction is to develop
workpiece. analogous systems that
• Inspection and metrology systems. can link different kinds of
• Material transport systems for both feedstocks and finished monomers in order to
products. broaden the range of
materials that can be used
Development of Early-Generation Productive Nanosystems to make AP polymer
objects. This approach can
Existing APPNs are self-assembled biopolymeric mechanisms that enable the production of
fabricate biopolymers (proteins and nucleic acids) under the direction higher-performance AP
of DNA. To extend the scope of APM based on productive nano- products by improving the
systems, a natural direction is to develop analogous systems that can stability, predictability,
link different kinds of monomers in order to broaden the range of rigidity, and functionality
materials that can be used to make AP polymer objects. This approach of the structures.
can enable the production of higher-performance AP products by
improving the stability, predictability, rigidity, and functionality of the
structures, accomplishing this by using (for example) novel backbone
structures, denser cross-linking, and monomer side-chains with special
functional properties. This approach to APM is clearly complementary
to scanning-probe based methods, as each can make products that the
other cannot.
An appealing approach for early-generation APPNs is to mimic

biological ribosomes by using nucleic acid sequences to direct
operations by binding sequences of monomeric building blocks via
nucleic acid “adapters” analogous to tRNA molecules. The use of
complementary sequences substantially longer than the three bases
used in biology can increase reliability and obviate the need for

sophisticated kinetic proofreading like that employed by biological
ribosomes. It should be noted that ribosomes are relatively simple
mechanosynthetic devices: They employ no special catalysis to form
bonds, relying instead simply on positional control of the reactive
molecules to promote and direct bonding.
This objective suggest a range useful research challenges that are useful
or necessary to meet in order to develop early-generation APPNs and
products of practical utility:
• Design and evaluation of competing architectures for broadly
ribosome-like APPNs, in order to prioritize options for
meeting the following challenges.
• Development of competing options for backbone structures.
Monomer accessibility, reactivity and cost are
considerations, as well as the properties of the resulting
structures.
• Development of nucleic acid (or analogous) adapters to bind
sequences of monomers in accordance with base sequences
in DNA strands.
• Development of mechanisms for binding and transporting
sequences of monomers to a reaction site where they are
linked and removed from their carrier.
• Provision of high-purity feedstocks of correctly coupled
monomers and adapters (purity is a constraint on defect
rates in the product structures).
• Development of monomers and linking mechanisms that
enable the production of densely cross-linked AP polymeric
objects of high stability, strength, rigidity, and overall
robustness.
• Further development of pairs of interface structures and
moities that can be covalently “locked” to give self-assembled
products higher stability, strength, and overall robustness.
Pathfinding for Advanced-Generation Productive

Nanosystems
Within certain limits, computational modeling can support the
development and evaluation of exploratory designs for complex
nanosystems. This can speed the development of advanced-generation
APPNs by enabling a more efficient and coordinated application of
research and development effort. Designers can explore the utility of
potential developments in fabrication methods by modeling and
evaluating components of the sort that those potential methods could

make. Evaluation of the projected utilities of research objectives can
enable researchers to select directions that are more to produce high-
value results by dovetailing with other results to enable system
development.
System level design and modeling can, in turn, determine the

requirements for components, enabling their evaluation. (In practice, of
course, component design and system design form an iterative process
in component properties also constrain system architectures.)
The challenges for modeling here differ from those in molecular biology
and biochemistry. As noted in an earlier section, components that are
(for example) relatively rigid, regular, and stable can be far more
susceptible to atomistic modeling than are components accessible by
means of current fabrication processes. Further, straw-man exploratory
designs can include susceptibility to modeling as a design criterion.
These considerations facilitate the design, modeling, and evaluation of
important classes of potential downstream development targets,
including nanomechanical systems comprising advanced-generation
APPNs. The challenges are quite unlike those of modeling, for example,
soft, un-designed biological systems presented by nature.
Experimentation contributes to pathfinding by testing and discovering It is anticipated that the

structures, functions, and processes of kinds that will be useful later in a enabling technologies for
systems context. This motivates an enormous range of work in next-generation APPNs
materials science, surface science, and chemistry. Tip-directed synthesis will increasingly rely on
methods, in particular, can be seen as prototypes for operations seen as previous generations of
important in advanced-generation APPNs. APPNs that, in a successful
development chain, must
In pathfinding for advanced-generation APPNs, the overall research be able to produce com-
challenge is to identify and compare alternative chains of enabling ponents and systems with
technologies. In the earlier generations, components will be made and
expanded capabilities.
manipulated chiefly by techniques that are direct extensions of current
laboratory practice. In the later generations, it is anticipated that the
enabling technologies for next-generation APPNs will increasingly rely
on previous generations of APPNs that, in a successful development
chain, must be able to produce components and systems with expanded
capabilities.
A modest level of effort invested in forward-looking design exercises

and experimentation can leverage ongoing research by enabling it to
target what are likely to be high-value objectives. It can also help
identify challenges that require greater focus, missing scientific
knowledge that impedes or obstructs effective modeling, and obstacles
that make an otherwise attractive path very difficult or completely
infeasible. Information of this kind can help define a better targeted
research and development program.

A Call to Action: Policy Recommendations
The goal of this Roadmap is to accelerate the development and
application of nanotechnology to improve the human condition. We
believe this will require the development of Productive Nanosystems
and Atomically Precise Manufacturing (APM), which enable science,
engineering, and manufacturing at the nanoscale. A long-term program
such as this requires strategies that deliver intermediate benefits to
justify the investment. This Policy section will first sketch the
opportunities, next suggest some general approaches and principles,
and then present specific initiatives proposed to be undertaken by the
United States:
“Strategy One” is to develop atomically precise technologies that

enable clean energy supplies and a cost-effective energy infrastructure.
“Strategy Two” is to develop atomically precise technologies that result

in nanostructured medicines and multifunctional therapeutic devices to
improve human health.
The Opportunity
This Roadmap’s sketch of Atomically Precise Manufacturing offers a
Now is the time to take the vision with immense leverage—and challenges—in many areas. It builds
next step of accelerating on and extends the nanoscience foundation established by the U.S.
the translation of our
National Nanotechnology Initiative1 and similar initiatives in other
countries. While only a small subset of possible breakthroughs enabled
global nanoscience
by APM has been described in this Roadmap, success in just one of
research into beneficial
these areas would justify a major program. The economic value derived
nanotechnology, by
from early APM commercialization is projected to be enormous,
launching programs
creating huge new economic opportunities for those who succeed.
focused on the
development and We urge involvement by responsible participants worldwide in
commercialization of achieving APM. Now is the time to take the next step of accelerating the
APM. translation of our global nanoscience research into beneficial
nanotechnology, by launching programs focused on the development
and commercialization of APM. In the U.S., the NNI has been
instrumental in focusing world attention on nanoscience and has
provided world leadership in establishing the necessary interdisciplinary
research. A major opportunity exists to leverage the past eight years of
NNI research platforms and to establish a unifying vision for the
advancement of atomically precise technologies and APM. Our aim in
this Roadmap is to call for the development of Atomically Precise
Manufacturing Technologies that will address the grand challenges of
1
National Nanotechnology Initiative web information at www.nano.gov

Energy, Health Care and other fields that will benefit from atomically
precise technologies and Productive Nanosystems.
General Approaches and Principles

Our strategy should emphasize competition to find good ideas, and
markets to reward success and to allocate scarce resources of money, Decentralized competition
time, and brainpower. Development of the Internet economy has shown and cooperation will move
the power of competition and markets to accomplish a wide range of faster and at a lower cost
tasks faster and cheaper than large centralized programs. Rather than
than setting up and
creating a single, multi-billion-dollar project, we should aim for a mix of
attempting to manage a
thousands of one-million-dollar efforts and hundreds of ten-million-
single, enormous program.
dollar efforts, using these to lay the groundwork for tens of hundred-
million-dollar efforts. Many pathways lead toward our goal, and they
will inevitably lead to unexpected opportunities, difficulties, and mutual
synergies. As with the commercialization of the Internet, decentralized
competition and cooperation will move faster and at a lower cost than
setting up and attempting to manage a single, enormous program.
Cooperation between government, academia, and industry is essential.

A well-designed program would fund multiple company/university
groups to compete with one another in target areas, while fostering
cooperation within an individual company/university cluster.
Improvements in the rules and mechanisms for technology transfer
between universities and companies would be highly beneficial. High
speed communications will support close international collaborations
that can benefit from brainpower anywhere in the world.
Industry involvement is essential for program focus and rapid

deployment of the technologies developed. However, companies have a
limited ability to invest in long-term research. Financial markets often
punish public companies for making R&D expenditures, and small
private companies lack the necessary resources. Government research
funding can make a crucial difference in the scale, breadth, and time-
horizon of industry-driven R&D. Tax policy could foster more R&D, but
with much less focus and effectiveness than a targeted funding program.
In the U.S., new types of government funding programs are needed that
support larger research budgets for longer times than programs such as
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR). The Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA) model of R&D funding2 works very
2
DARPA maintains a very small staff of highly technical Program Managers
who have broad discretion to propose programs, award significant contracts,
and push for breakthrough results in short time horizons. Bypassing most of
the bureaucracy involved in normal government R&D contracts, this model
can fund risky projects that other agencies would shy away from. For two

well at funding high-impact, competitive research (such as the creation
of the Internet). Creating a DARPA-like program focused on APM,
fostering R&D proposals from competitive consortia of universities and
companies, would create a dynamic and productive environment for
rapid technology development and commercialization. Creating such an
agency would be a very productive and cost-effective way for a country
to launch an APM program.
Once early laboratory results have demonstrated the fundamental

operations required for next-generation APM, we would expect some
countries to launch a DARPA-like program to accelerate progress. The
challenge will be to build programs with the right participants and
incentives to take technologies from early demonstrations to scalable
systems, products, and industries. A program under university control
could foster research, but would not directly support system-level
development. A program under government lab control could enable
early system-level development, but would not bring technologies and
products to market. Corporations would have incentives to bridge the
final steps to market, but these same incentives would the necessary
precursor stages. A well-structured consortium of these organizational
forms, however, would give each participant an ability to do what it
does best.
International cooperation will deliver the benefits of APM and APPNs

to the world faster, and with wider applications, than a number of
smaller national programs duplicating one another’s work.
Coordinating a full international effort is beyond the scope of this initial
Roadmap, but is extremely desirable. We recommend a future
international workshop on atomically precise manufacturing with
representatives from countries wishing to participate in such a program.
Recommendations for the United States

The U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office3 should
coordinate both the governmental and university aspects of a national
examples, see DARPA’s “Revolutionizing Prosthetics” program to build an

advanced prosthetic arm controlled by neural impulses
(http://www.darpa.mil/dso/thrusts/bio/restbio_tech/revprost/index.htm) and
their “Grand Challenge” program to develop self-driving vehicles
(http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/index.asp).
3
The National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office (web site at
www.nano.gov/html/about/nnco.html) currently assists in the preparation of
multi-agency planning, budget and assessment documents. The NNCO is the
point of contact on Federal nanotechnology activities for regional, state and
local nanotechnology initiatives, government organizations, academia,
industry, professional societies, foreign organizations, and others to exchange
technical and programmatic information. In addition, the NNCO develops

program to develop APM. The NNCO should be augmented with an
industry representative to coordinate this program.
The National Science Foundation should work with NNCO to structure

a university program to develop APM. The NSF already manages a
network of universities as part of their National Nanotechnology
Infrastructure Network4. Created as a user facility, this network offers
access to advanced tools at 13 universities around the U.S. The tools
needed for APM are expected to be different from the NNIN’s top-
down approach to generic nanotechnology, but the collaboration model
established by the NNIN would be beneficial for development of APM.
Emphasis should be placed on developing effective collaborations
between universities and industry.
Strategy One: APM Research Targeting Clean and Low-Cost Energy

Infrastructure should become a major focus of the U.S. Department of The collaboration model
Energy. The DOE has been successful in creating five Nanoscale Science established by the
Research Centers (NSRCs) that are aligned in the support of DOE’s National Nanotechnology
mission by performing both basic sciences and applications research. Infrastructure Network
All five centers are user facilities that provide access to industry and would be beneficial for
other research organizations: development of APM.
• Center for Nanophase Materials Science at Oak Ridge Emphasis should be placed
National Laboratory on developing effective
collaborations between
• Molecular Foundry at Lawrence Berkeley National
universities and industry.
Laboratory
• Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies at Los Alamos
National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories
• Center for Nanoscale Materials at Argonne National
Laboratory
• Center for Functional Nanomaterials at Brookhaven
National Laboratory
These five nanotechnology centers are ideally suited to lead an

“Atomically Precise Manufacturing Initiative for Energy Systems” that
will also impact other industries and markets. The applications section
of this Roadmap highlights a few of the huge opportunities to
dramatically improve efficiency, generation, conversion, and storage of
energy. Around the world, governments, universities, and industry are
making growing investments in photovoltaics, fuel cells, thermoelectric
and piezoelectric energy harvesting, solid state lighting, and bio-energy.
and makes available printed and other materials as directed by the NSET
Subcommittee, and maintains the NNI Web site.
4
National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network web information at
www.nnin.org

A core program to develop Productive Nanosystems will provide
enabling technology to advance all these initiatives.
A new position of “DOE Program Manager for Atomically Precise

Technologies” should be created to work with the five DOE
nanotechnology centers to develop a strategic plan that integrates and
aligns resources in support of APM pathways discussed in this
Roadmap. This program manager should also sit on the National
Nanotechnology Coordinating Office board as a representative of the
DOE, and would be responsible for managing a grant program to
address industrial needs while also bringing in industrial cost share to
accelerate the research and development of APM pathways.
The DOE has launched a program called ARPA-E to streamline its

R&D. This represents an opportunity for the DOE to evaluate including
APM in new ARPA-E initiatives. This would help accelerate the APM
technology development for fuel cells, photovoltaics, and other
renewable energy programs.
Strategy Two: Atomically Precise Nanomedicine Technologies to

Improve Human Health should become a major focus of the National
Institutes of Health. The NIH already has efforts in nanotechnology, but
the power of APM would revolutionize our ability to analyze,
synthesize, and ultimately commercialize atomically precise
multifunctional in-vivo and in-vitro therapeutic and diagnostic devices.
A new position of “NIH Program Manager for Atomically Precise
Technologies” should be created to align NIH resources, and this
person should sit on the NNCO board as a representative of the NIH.
Conclusion
The sooner we launch programs to develop APM and productive
nanosystems, the sooner our vision suggests we can enjoy the benefits
of cleaner energy and healthier lives. A vital next step is further
development of this Roadmap by an expanded international team
drawing from a wide variety of nanoscale-focused organizations.
The graphic on the following page gives an overview of the basis for
collaborative research and the possible early and advanced outcomes in
productive nanosystems and applications. The research areas indicated
therein and the tools necessary for making progress toward developing
nanotechnology applications are discussed in the next section, Topics in
Detail.

Practicable Nanotechnology Research Initiatives and Outcomes

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Topic 1 Components and Devices
1.1 Introduction
This topic covers passive and active components of kinds that may
prove useful in implementing atomically precise functional nano-
systems. The boundary dividing “components and devices” (discussed
here) from “systems” (discussed in a later section) is necessarily
somewhat arbitrary. The line drawn here includes passive and active
structures that have what are in some sense elementary functions. Some
are structural elements that in combination could form an extended
framework; others are functional elements that could (e.g., logic gates)
be composed to make functional systems (e.g., computing devices).
As discussed in the Agenda for Research, it would be of great value to

have an ongoing compilation of components and devices indexed by
properties relevant to their fabrication and use. Classes of components
can be defined by functional criteria, and within those classes, compon-
ents can be characterized by both general metrics (e.g., size, mass,
composition, maximum operating temperature) and class-specific
metrics (e.g., motor torque, logic gate delay time). A compilation of this
kind would aid designers, reveal needs, and foster cross-disciplinary
communication. Today’s alternative is a literature that is difficult to
access and impossible to search effectively with respect to the relevant
criteria and metrics: this is a major impediment to problem-solving in
the development of APM and functional AP nanosytems. Better ways
are needed to exploit the results of the billions of dollars of research
funding that has been invested in nanotechnologies and related fields.
1.2 Structural Components

Structural components include components that are primarily used to
hold parts of a system in place, to provide dimensional precision,
stiffness and strength. They must resist deformation due to thermal
vibration and due to the forces present during system operation. For
these components, in addition to the information of interest for
atomically precise components in general, parameters of interest also
include:
• Stiffness
• Strength
• Granularity (the scale of the units of design: atoms,
monomers...)
Nanotechnology Roadmap Topics in Detail 63

1.2.1 Modular Oligomers
Modular components are components that can be built of a series of
independently chosen monomers, such as the nucleotides of DNA or
the amino acid residues of proteins. These components are discussed at
length in Topic 2 Systems and Frameworks in the context of structural
systems. See Lewis, Paper 08, Working Group Proceedings; see also
Mathieu et al., 1995.
1.2.2 Surfaces
Perfect surfaces of stiff crystals are attractive building platforms for
Perfect surfaces of stiff atomically precise structures (see also Topic 2 Systems and
crystals provide long range Frameworks). They provide long range atomically precise positioning,
atomically precise effectively using the parallel chemical bonds in the bulk of the crystal to
positioning, effectively constrain the amplitude of both thermal fluctuations and the elastic
using the parallel chemical deformations that may result from forces applied by a mechanical
bonds in the bulk of the nanosystem. Today, atomically flat crystal terraces as large as 8x8
crystal to constrain the microns are available for silicon (Lee et al., 2001).
amplitude of both thermal
fluctuations and the elastic 1.2.3 Sheets and Fibers
deformations that may
result from forces applied A sheet, like graphene or MoS2 can serve as a stable substrate analogous
by a mechanical to a crystal terrace, albeit without the mechanical reinforcement
nanosystem.
provided by the subsurface chemical bonds. In the plane of the sheet, it
is still a highly fused polycyclic system.
Polymers with Covalent Backbones. This category includes DNA and

proteins, which are covered in detail in Topic 2 Systems and
Frameworks. More generally, any programmable 1D polymer, anything
that can be built by solid phase synthesis, can be directly useful as a 3D
component if it folds predictably. Even if it does not fold predictably, if
it can be put under tension (e.g., by covalent bonds to DNA on both
ends) it may still be useful in placing exotic functional groups in
predictable 3D locations.
Fibers can include structures with a diameter of several atoms, such as

carbon nanotubes (covered below in Subsection 1.2.8, Graphene
Components) and a wide range of polymers. These can have high
strength along the backbone, and some are available in high molecular
weight. Locally, these structures are atomically precise. Some are also
available as oligomers of known length. These strands are attractive
tensile structural components for atomically precise nanosystems.
Non-Covalent Nanotubes. Another class of atomically precise linear

structural element now available comprises a growng range of
64 Topics in Detail Nanotechnology Roadmap
nanotubes formed by hydrogen-bonded self-assembly. This category
includes nanotubes formed from DNA. For example, studies of
variations on a tube type formed by self-assembly of two types of double
crossover tiles showed that diameters ranged from 7 to 20 nm. (See
Lewis, Paper 08, Working Group Proceedings; see also Rothemund et
al., 2004.)
Atomically precise self-assembled tubes have also been formed from

peptides. For example, 8, 10, and 12 residue cyclic peptides were
synthesized with alternating D and L amino acid residues, and it was
demonstrated that they self-assembled into nanotubes with a beta-sheet
motif (Hartgerink et al., 1996).
1.2.4 Dendrimers
Dendrimers are special polymers assembled by a branching growth
process, conceptually beginning with groups A and B that will bond,
e.g., after an activation step on B. Starting with a single root molecule of
the form AXB2, the two B groups are activated, then reacted with two
additional molecules of the monomer to form AX(B-AXB2)2. The four B
groups on this must then be activated and reacted with four molecules
of the monomer to form AX(B-AX(B-AXB2)2)2. Each of these steps is
called a generation. The molecule starts from a single point, and the
number of groups attached to that point grows exponentially with the
generation number such that the process is eventually limited by steric
congestion. If one stops short of that limit, the correctly synthesized
molecules are atomically precise. A wide variety of dendrimers have
been synthesized. The monomers used in each generation can differ,
e.g., AXB2 and AYB2. This yields options somewhat like those in
foldamers, but with less information per dalton because the late
generation monomers are numerous and are all identical in any given
generation.
Initially dendrimers were limited by the capabilities of conventional

organic synthesis. Major synthetic strides have been achieved by
development of self-assembly approaches that exploit hydrogen
bonding, metal coordination, and pi-pi stacking interactions. Stability
and utility are being enhanced via incorporation of mechanical bonds.
(See Fréchet, 2002; Northrup, 2005.)
1.2.5 Biological Nanoparticles

Certain biological nanoparticles are both atomically precise and
relatively large. They are therefore potential frameworks to which other
atomically precise components can be attached. Examples are viral
capsids, especially MS2 and TMV.
The group of Dr. Matthew Francis at the University of California,
Berkeley has developed many techniques (chemical reactions) to
incorporate functionalities of interest to specific, well-defined sites on
the walls of the cavities inside these structures and on their external
walls. These can be modified with, for example, polymers or proteins, to
control solubility, antibody recognition, and other key properties. A
functional example is the incorporation of MRI contrast agents within
the capsids. By using specific chemistries to target specific amino acids,
crystallographic knowledge of protein structure enables the
functionalization of discrete sites on discrete places on these protein
structures.
1.2.6 Ceramic Nanocrystals

Metal oxides. A wide variety of metal oxides have been prepared as
nanoscale particles. Viewed as molecules, these particles are highly
crosslinked, polycyclic structures; some have high stiffness (e.g.,
~300 GPa for TiO2). While this section concentrates on structural
components, nanoparticles of metal oxides might potentially serve in
• Molecule processing (as catalysts)
• Energy conversion (as photochemical centers)
• Signal transduction (as magnetoresistive elements)
• Information storage (as magnetic dipoles)
Currently, metal oxide nanoparticles are seldom atomically precise.

Over the long term, APM techniques should enable production of these
components with atomically precise structures. Over a somewhat
shorter term, the sol-gel oxide synthesis techniques may prove
amenable to atomically precise control, for instance, via binding
capping materials to crystal faces of correctly matching sizes. A modest
set of large atomically precise metal oxide particles are known, notably
polymolybdates (up to Mo368 monodisperse species) and tungstates,
which have been synthesized with quite diverse structures and ligands.
(See Roy, 2006; also Kong, Paper 20, Working Group Proceedings.)
II-VI semiconductors. II-VI semiconductor nanoparticles have

properties somewhat similar to some of the metal oxides (and the group
IIB oxides, notably ZnO, are in the intersection of the groups). They can
be made in nanoscale particles with well-defined internal crystal
structures, and researchers have been successful in narrowing the
distribution of size, yet these are generally not available as single species
of atomically precise particles. The exceptions include a modest set of
“closed shell” structures.

Typically, these particles are made by precipitation from organic
solvents in a reaction between an organometallic compound of the
group IIB metal (e.g., dimethylcadmium) and a chalcogenide donor
compound (e.g., bis-trimethylsilyl sulfide) in the presence of a capping
ligand (e.g., a trialkylphosphine) (See Cao, 2004.)
While these materials are potentially useful as structural materials, they

also are useful as functional components in other areas, notably in
• Photonics and signal transduction, due to their (quantum
dot) fluorescence
− Notable due to modulation of their energy levels by
confinement of carriers to the dot
− Notable due to much better resistance to photobleaching
than traditional chromophores
• Logic operations, as nanoscale semiconductors suitable for
transistors.
Advanced APM would enhance the usability of these components for

these applications, and early AP fabrication techniques could potentially
supply more sophisticated capping that would enable the synthesis of a
wider range of atomically precise components made from this class of
materials.
1.2.7 Metallic Nanocrystals

A number of metals are available as nanoscale crystals. On the lower
end of the size spectrum, there are many known metal cluster
compounds. Clusters such as Au55 are atomically precise and can be
used as atomically precise components.
Other areas of applications for these components include

• Information processing: use as electrodes in single electron
tunneling (see Chi et al., 1998).
• Signal transduction: use of plasmon resonances to greatly
increase sensitivity for Raman-effect sensing of adsorbates.
• Chemical processing: use of metal nanocrystals to catalyze
reactions. The trade-off between use of metal nanocrystals
versus use of complexes of isolated metal atoms would need
to be evaluated case by case. A very wide range of catalytic
properties is available from these simpler components as
well.

1.2.8 Graphene Components
There is a vast literature on graphene nanostructures. These are very
stiff (with theoretical Young’s modulus around 1 TPa), so they are
extraordinarily attractive as rigid structural components. Roughly
speaking, these components exist in the following types:
• C60, C70, other fullerenes, and their derivatives
• Planar, atomically precise graphene sheets, currently up to
C222H42
• Larger, planar graphene flakes, atomically imprecise at their
edges
• Single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs
and MWCNTs)
• Various other structures: “nano-onions” (nested fullerenes),
nanohorns, etc.
Identifying opportunities Graphene is a two-dimensional, honeycomb structured monolayer of

to exploit atomic-scale graphite. Defects in the regular hexagonal lattice, such as pentagons or
properties: double-walled heptagons, result in curling of the two-dimensional graphene sheet into
nanotubes show physical
three-dimensional structures. The most well-known is the soccer-ball
shaped C60 fullerene, comprised of 12 pentagons and 20 hexagons.
and electrical properties,
similar to single-walled A single-walled carbon nanotube is a seamless cylinder of graphene that
tubes but possess enhanced possesses physical and electrical properties distinct from both graphite
chemical resistance owing and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. SWCNTs possess metallic or
to the additional layer of semiconducting properties that are dependent on tube chirality and can
atoms. be manipulated via doping, and that rival those of the best metals and
semiconductors used in current electronics. Synthesis approaches are
relatively aggressive and uncontrolled, generally involving the
deposition of vaporized graphene or carbon onto a catalyst or other
template, and cost of production remains a significant hurdle to more
widespread utilization.
Multi-walled nanotubes are typically a set of single-walled nanotubes of

progressively increasing diameter, arranged as concentric cylinders.
Double-walled nanotubes show physical and electrical properties
similar to single-walled tubes but possess enhanced chemical resistance
owing to the additional layer of atoms. The additional layers also render
multi-walled nanotubes attractive candidates for functionalization and
modification, broadening further the range of potential applications.
Carbon nanotubes, particularly the single-walled variety, occupy an

unusual middle ground in atomic precision. An infinitely long nanotube
has its structure defined by a two-integer index called the roll-up vector,
which defines the angle and width at which one would have to
(conceptually) cut a strip out of a graphene plane in order to roll it into
a nanotube of this type. Amongst other properties, this roll-up vector
determines if a SWCNT is metallic or semiconducting. Some progress
has been made in isolating SWCNTs of desired roll-up vectors.
Preparing finite nanotube segments that are atomically precise in the The fullerenes and the
same way that, e.g., anthracene, is atomically precise, will be a more C222H42 graphene sheets
challenging research goal. This will require that all of the segments be of are atomically precise
precisely the same length, and that their terminal groups match as well. components today, and
could be incorporated as a
A natural target of APM is to prepare such structures. It is possible that section of a foldamer
this may be a relatively near-term task. The conditions for producing component where a small
nanotubes today are rather drastic (laser or arc vaporization, high but high stiffness part is
temperature CVD), but the conditions for forming/interconnecting the needed.
aromatic rings in synthesizing C222H42 are rather mild (FeCl3 oxidation)
(see Kastler, 2006 ). A similar reaction may be feasible in early MMCNs
(see Topic 2 Systems and Frameworks), potentially allowing true
atomically precise SWCNT segments to be prepared.
Alternatively, SWCNTs have been grown with transition metal

catalysts. MMCN techniques may potentially be used to prepare
atomically precise catalyst particles that could then be used to produce
tubes with a selected roll-up vector – albeit of uncontrolled length.
In addition to their use as structural components, graphene

components show promise for application in multiple areas, including:
• Information processing: semiconducting SWCNTs have
been used as transistors
• Power and signal transmission: metallic SWCNTs have very
high current-carrying capability
• Actuators: MWCNTs have been used in a motor, with sliding
rotary motion between concentric tubes
• Chemical sensors: CNTs have shown sensitivity to adsorbed
molecules.
1.2.9 Inorganic Nanotubes

Spanning the periodic table in composition, inorganic nanotubes and
fullerene-like particles comprise a broad range of structures and
properties, sometimes analogous to their carbon counterparts.
Inorganic nanotubes include boron nitride (BN), transition metal
sulfides and oxides, selenides, halides, and more. WS2 nanotubes, for
example, possess lower Young’s modulus but are much stronger under
compression than carbon nanotubes, and undoped BN nanotubes are
uniformly insulating. Some properties, such as piezoelectric effects, are
generally accessible only in non-carbon nanotubes. Similar to carbon
nanotube approaches, synthesis is relatively aggressive and unspecific,
particularly with respect to nanotube diameter, and there is again scope
for more controlled syntheses using AP structures employing catalytic
functional elements. See Pokropivnyi, 2001; Pokropivnyi, 2002; Zettl
Research Group, 2007.
1.2.10 Semiconductor and Metallic Nanowires

Both semiconductors (Si, InP, etc.) and metals (Ni, Au, Pd, etc.) have
been produced in the form of nanowires, structures typically a few
nanometers in diameter and as much as microns long. The mechanism
of formation is typically a liquid drop catalysed deposition from vapor
phase material, not unlike carbon nanotube CVD growth. The semicon-
ducting nanowires are typically crystalline and do not have an atomic-
ally precise diameter. As with other crystalline materials, the interior
bonds contribute to their strength and stiffness. APM may provide
mechanisms for fabricating these materials in atomically precise form.
As with quantum dots, these materials are notable for carrier confine-
ment effects on the energies of electronic states.
1.3 Motors and Actuators

For motors and actuators, there are a number of function-specific
metrics of interest:
• Maximum load
− Stall force (for a linear motor)
− Stall torque (for a rotary motor)
• Maximum speed (unloaded linear and angular velocities,
respectively)
• Energy efficiency
1.3.1 Biological
All cellular organisms contain both linear and rotary molecular motors
(MM). An additional example is a bacteriophage that uses an ATP-
fueled corkscrew motor to fill and pressurize a capsule with DNA.
While fluorescence labeling can be used to characterize the structure
and motion of MM, their localization remains a synthetic challenge.
One option for a positioning template is the bacterial S-layer; another is
a DNA origami based framework (see Topic 2 Systems and Frame-
works), an approach that promises great control in building complex,
functional structures.
Existing biological motors have diverse properties:
• Flagella
− Contain all of the components of conventional motors
(bearings, rotators, shafts, stators, fuel requirement, etc.)
− Powered by the flow of protons across a membrane
− Self assemble from 40 proteins
• Myosin (a muscle protein)
− Uses ATP fuel
− Drives linear motion of fibers, causing muscle
contraction
• Kinesin
− Uses ATP fuel, 100 steps/second, 5-7 pN force
− Transports large cargo objects (cell organelles) along
microtubules.
• ATP Synthase
− Rotary motor, 44 pN force
− Powered by the flow of protons across a membrane, the
resulting mechanical energy is used to sythesize ATP
• DNA Translocase
− Acts like a fishing rod reel: pulls in DNA like a line
− Bidirectional translocation
− When attached to a surface: directional, provides useful
work-pulls DNA in
− Motor is controllable (via methylation)
1.3.2 Synthetic
Atomically Precise. A photochemical rotary motor is an example of an
atomically precise stepping motor. This motor uses a C=C double bond A photochemical rotary
as an axle and operates in a four-state cycle. Upon irradiation with 280 motor is an atomically
nm UV light, state A isomerizes to state B, which then relaxes thermally precise, unidirectional
into state C, characterized by the rearrangement of sterically hindered motor that is steppable.
aromatic groups attached to the double bond. Upon irridation with a
unique frequency of UV light, 380 nm, state C isomerizes to state D,
rotating the double bond by another 180 degrees. Finally, state D
thermally relaxes back to state A, completing the cycle. This atomically
precise motor is unidirectional and, because of the different light
frequencies used, steppable. (See Vicario et al., 2006.)

Structural DNA nanotechnology methods have been used to construct
several kinds of motors and actuators that are powered and controlled
by the addition of short DNA strands to the surrounding solution.
Because these act on complementary sequences in the motor structure,
and because different motors can have different sequences in their
active sites, multiple motors in a single nanomechanical system can by
this means be addressed and activated with independent control.
Atomically Imprecise. Dr. Alex Zettl and his colleagues at Lawrence

Berkeley Laboratories and UC Berkeley have constructed several
nanoscale devices whose motion is controlled from the desktop with
changing voltage: a rotating molecular motor, a molecular actuator, and
a nanoelectromechanical relaxation oscillator.
A piezoactive polymer of Piezoelectrics can be used for actuation by varying an applied field to a
potential utility is piezoelectric crystal, such as lead zirconate titanate. The principal near-
poly(vinylidene difluoride), term disadvantage for using these crystals as components is the same as
PVDF, (CH2CF2)n. for most other crystal components: they are not currently available as
Oligomers of PVDF could atomically precise components. In addition, some piezoelectrics are
serve as atomically precise solid solutions, with substitutional disorder within the crystal lattice.
actuators available in the Advanced APM is expected to benefit applications of piezoelectrics by
near term. Control of fabricating precisely controlled phases with substituents in controlled
strand orientation is locations, and by controlling the location and orientation of piezo-
crucial to their function, as electric domains. (See Fifield, Paper 31, Working Group Proceedings.)
piezoelectric activity
SWCNTs have been used as electromechanical actuators. Immersed in
requires asymmetry along
an electrolyte solution (to provide counterions when the tube is
one axis. charged), they have exhibited strains of up to 1% (see Baughman et al.,
2002).
Thermally responsive polymers provide another mechanism for using a

controllable environmental property to produce motion. In small (yet
far larger than nanoscale) systems, thermal time-constants can be
milliseconds or less, increasing the potential utility of this approach.
1.3.3 Macroscopic
Scanning probe systems with atomically precise positioning capability
typically use macroscopic positioning components (often piezoelectric
ceramics). Extending the range and repeatability of these components
and of systems containing them would be useful in developing
atomically precise systems.

1.4 Motion Control
Motion control is fundamental to macroscale systems that move parts
with respect to one another, for example, those that assemble other
components to build systems. The spontaneous Brownian motion of
nanoscale objects together with selective binding can be used to build
systems without motion control. With motion control, however, the
constraints imposed by self-assembly can be relaxed, because parts can
be directed to their binding sites. Similar remarks apply to material
transportation.
Hinges have been
A motion control component controls the relative motion of parts in a fabricated from DNA.
system. The components considered in this section are a subset of ( See Lewis, Paper
these, distinguished from the motors in the section above in that these 08,Working Group
do not directly provide the mechanical energy for this motion. A large Proceedings; see also Yurke
range of these components rely simply on rigid body kinematics and in et al., 2000.)
some cases elasticity. A reasonable near-term research goal would be to A near-term implementa-
construct many of them from DNA structures (albeit with modest tion of a clutch between a
mechanical performance).
driven component and a
For these components, rigidity, energy dissipation and operating load component may be as
frequency are important metrics. simple as using one single
stranded DNA sequence as
Examples of motion control components include: one component, using a
second as the other com-
• Bearings
ponent, and using the
− Bonded: sigma bonds, ferrocenes addition of a strand
− Non-bonded: complementary to both
o Biological examples, e.g., in flagella sequences for the actuation
o Sliding nonbonded interfaces with systematic of the clutch.
cancellation of lateral forces owing to rotational
symmetries
• Gears: “teeth” via interlocking shapes, hydrogen bonds, dative
bonds, etc. (See Lewis, Paper 08, Working Group Proceedings;
see also Tian and Mao, 2004.)
• Hinges: many implementations
• Stops, detents: many implementations
• Clutches: implementations using interlocking shapes,
hydrogen bonds, dative bonds, etc.

1.5 Molecule Processing
Molecule processing components transport or transform molecules.
These functions are of interest in implementing APM and APPNs, and
have value in a wide range of other contexts, including chemical
synthesis and separations.
Metrics of interest in devices for structural transformation of molecules

include:
• Reaction rates
• Error/side-reaction rates
• Required placement accuracy (where relevant)
• Selectivity of operation (determines what kinds and locations
of alternative reactive sites can exist without causing
substantial error rates)
1.5.1 Catalysts
A vast array of catalysts is known. In some reactions a catalyst can be as
simple as a hydrogen ion. For the purpose of near-tem use in molecule-
processing nanosystems, an important category of atomically precise
examples is the set of metal complexes used in homogeneous catalysis.
While the homogeneous catalysts are employed in solution, for use in a

nanosystem it would be advantageous to use slightly modified variations
which would employ modified ligands to attach the catalytic center to a
larger framework to control its location. Alternatively, noncovalent
binding to a suitably designed protein would suffice.
1.5.2 Enzymes
Enzymes are a special category of atomically precise catalyst, composed
of proteins, and able to catalyze a wide variety of reactions. They have
been heavily studied, and many of their active sites are known in atomic
detail.
Typically an enzyme surrounds part or all of the substrate(s) that

participate in the reaction that it catalyses. One way of thinking about
how some enzymes work is to think of them as being receptors for the
transition state of a reaction. By presenting a complementary surface to
the transition state of a reaction, they bind to it and lower its energy,
thus lowering the barrier for the reaction and accelerating it. Some
enzymes are highly specific to just one substrate.

In other instances, an enzyme is more intimately involved in a reaction,
for example donating a hydrogen ion from an acidic side chain that
reacts with a substrate at one step in a reaction, eventually receiving it
back after several intermediate steps.
As with other catalysts, attachment of an enzyme or modified enzyme

to a larger AP nanostructure or device can provide means to direct its
activity to specific sites, and (in more complex systems) for it to act at
specific times in a sequence of operations.
1.5.3 Atomic Ledges, Kinks, and Adatoms

Many chemical processes involve inhomogeneous catalysis, in which a
reaction takes place on a solid surface. In such cases, it is often not the
flat terraces of the crystal that are truly catalytically active, but instead
the less coordinatively saturated surface defect sites.
In advanced APM, after atomically precise nanoscale crystals can be

reliably assembled, one could expect that these functional “defect” sites
can be made precisely and reproducibly, providing structures that can
serve as reactive components of nanosystems. In the near term,
atomically precise analogs of these sites might be accessible as potential
components through metal cluster chemistry.
1.5.4 Active Tips

Many of the mechanisms discussed above are applicable to reactions
directed by STM, provided that the necessary active structures are
provided as tips. Further operations become possible by exploiting the
high electric fields and current densities that these tips can create.
An important subset of these are tips suitable for removing passivation

from surfaces for use in patterned ALE approaches (discussed in detail
in Topic 3 Fabrication and Synthesis Methods). Initially, the most
desirable reactions are those that remove H (and possibly Cl)
passivation from Si (and possibly Ge) surfaces. An important research
goal will be to atomically characterize the tip structures that participate
in these reactions. Some dramatic work has recently been done in
systematically fabricating and characterizing single atom Pd tips on
atomically precise W{211}, three-sided pyramids on W(111) surfaces
(Kuo et al., 2006). A later goal could be to align an array of such tips
with atomic precision for use in Phase 3 parallel patterned ALE
fabrication (see Topic 3 Fabrication and Synthesis Methods).
Other approaches employ catalysis, as shown in selective reduction of

azides to amines by a Pd tip (see Blackledge et al., 2000).

1.5.6 Filtration Membrane Pores
A number of structures can serve as filtration membrane pores.
• Atomically precise examples include many ion-selective
cellular channels from biology. These are typically a circular
assembly of membrane-bound proteins.
• DNA meshes have been proposed as atomically precise pore
structures (see Mohammadzadegan and Mohabatkar, 2007).
• Carbon nanotube segments have been found to have
extraordinary transport properties of use in water
purification (see Ghosh et al., 2006).
1.5.7 Soluble or Volatile Precursors

A broad range of materials that are important to the development of
APM are not precisely components in that not all of their atoms will
necessarily be incorporated in the final structure, but which are
precursors to portions of the atomically precise structures.
The nature of these materials depends heavily on the specific

fabrication chemistry in use. In the case of ALE, this could include
silane and germane (GeH4) and some of their derivatives. In the case of
II-VI nanocrystals, this can include organometallic compounds and
chalcogen donors.
1.6 Computation
1.6.1 Logic Operations

For logic gates, important metrics include
• Frequency
• Fanout
• Power dissipation
• Error rates.
Most amplifying elements provide a nonlinearity that can be used to

perform logic. Amplifying electronic components that have been
demonstrated in molecules include:
• Nanotube FETs: Semiconducting SWCNTs have been used
to produce FETs of both n-type and p-type. These devices
have been combined into inverters, and into other simple
logic gates.

• Negative differential resistance diodes
• SETs (single electron transistors)
1.6.2 Memory
Every logic technology listed above can also be used to build cross-
coupled inverters and therefore memory. Additionally:
• DNA, as well as being useful as a structural material, is also
usable as an information storage medium.
• A wide range of structures with bistable energy minima are
candidates for information storage:
− Molecules exhibiting cis-trans isomerism
− Slowly interconverting tautomeric pairs
− Rotaxanes with two or more energy minima
− Van der Waals bonds between elastically deformed
nanotubes
− Hydrogen bonds with double well minima
− Electronic double minima in which an electron can be
located on either of two metal ions, both of which are
stable in two oxidation states
1.6.3 Mechanical Computation Components

Sliding rods with mechanical interlocks can implement systems with
behavior that parallels CMOS logic circuits. With stiff components, this
approach enables high frequency operation (GHz range). A larger,
slower version could be made from DNA or other near-term accessible
structural elements. Systems of this sort might find niche applications
in contexts where the limiting factor is energy per computation rather
than clock rate. Switching energies of less than 1 eV appear feasible in
principle.
1.6.4 Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

An approach to computation which uses electrostatic interactions, but
which does not involve current flow over long distances is based on
quantum-dot cellular automata. The components are small blocks built
from a handful of quantum dots (e.g., four per block). In one scheme a
pair of electrons trapped on each block selects between residence on the
(four) possible dots. The blocks are placed sufficiently closely that
electrostatic coupling between the blocks makes the positions of the
electrons in one block set the positions of the electrons in a neighboring
block. By proper arrangement of the couplings between the blocks these
interactions can be made to perform computations. Unlike the
approach in the next section, this approach does not rely on phase
coherence of the electrons, merely on their classical behavior, and is
therefore not “quantum computing” as the term has come to be used.
(See Porod et al., 1999.)
1.6.5 Coherent Quantum Computation

In this approach to computation, components of the system (“qubits”)
are put into a coherent superposition of states, which enables a limited
but (where applicable) extraordinarily powerful form of parallel
computation. The classic example is Shor’s 1994 algorithm for factoring
an integer N in O(log(N)3) time, which is much faster than the compar-
able time on a classical computer (which is roughly O(exp(log(N)1/3)).
The main challenge is that quantum computation requires the
maintenance of phase relationships among qubits, and these are easily
destroyed by interaction with the environment. APM may be helpful in
building systems where these interactions can be better controlled.
1.6.6 Signal Transmission

In a typical complex, active, integrated system, control signals must be
transmitted from their point of generation to the effectors of the
system; in a closed-loop system, signals from sensors need to be
transmitted as well. The components mentioned in this section are
examples of some of the options for implementing this function.
Metrics of interest for these components, and for the signal

transduction components in the next section, include
• Data transmission rate
• Energy requirements
• Error rates.
Electrical Conductors.
• Tour wires – mixed sp2/sp conjugated oligo(phenylene
ethynylene)s. Atomically precise, including end groups.
Metal junctions with these have been heavily studied
(notably Au/thiol contacts). Some chemical versatility, can be
built with substituents on phenylene hydrogens
• sp2 conjugated polymers, polyacetylene, polyaniline,
polythiophene. Locally, each of these is atomically precise.
• Nanotubes. There is an extensive literature on electrical
conduction in carbon nanotubes. By some measures, their

conductivity exceeds that of the best room temperature
metals.
Optical Waveguides. Existing optical fibers have extraordinarily low

losses (0.2 dB/km). The remaining losses include contributions from
Rayleigh scattering due to fluctuations inherent in the amorphous
structure of their glass cores, and from absorption by residual hydroxyl
groups in the glass. Replacing the glass with atomically precise
structures of crystalline regularity would eliminate these causes of signal
loss.
Acoustic Transmission. Many structural components can be used to

transmit acoustic signals. The speed of transmission is proportional to
the square root of the stiffness/density ratio, which for SWCNTs >20
km/sec.
1.7 Signal Transduction

Sensors are attractive near-term applications for AP devices and
systems. Since these produce information, rather than a volume of Sensor applications are
physical product, this application is less limited by near-term less limited by near-term
restrictions on the productivity of APM. In sensing a signal, it is often restrictions on the
important to convert it from one domain to another. The components productivity of APM
in this section apply to that task. because they produce
information, rather than a
• Optical to mechanical
volume of physical
− Includes the cis-trans molecular motors product.
− A natural example of an atomically precise optical sensor
with a mechanical output is the photoreactive
chromophore in rhodopsin, 11-cis retinal. On absorbing
a photon it isomerizes to an all-trans state. This shape
change then pushes the bound protein (opsin) into a
different conformation, triggering a cascade of changes
that ultimately launches a neural signal.
• Optical to electrical
− Semiconducting quantum dots (see Hegg and Lin, 2007)
− Atomically precise organic donor/acceptor combinations,
e.g., Cu-phthalocyanine/3,4,9,10-perylenetetracar-
boxylicbis-benzimidazole (see Peumans et al., 2000)
• Electrical to optical
− Semiconducting quantum dots.
− Organic light emitting diodes – Some examples of these
contain atomically precise discrete molecules as the emit-
ting centers, e.g., Tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminium
• Mechanical to optical [FRET]
− An important technique for detecting changes in position
in nanoscale devices is fluorescence resonant energy
transfer. A photon absorbed by a donor can be trans-
ferred to an acceptor over distances of the order of 5 nm.
If no transfer takes places, the donor can fluoresce in
isolation. If the distance is sufficiently close, the energy is
transferred to the acceptor, quenching the donor
fluorescence (and replacing it with acceptor fluorescence,
when present).
• Chemical to mechanical
− Includes all the molecular motors, also includes pH
sensitive polymers which will shrink or swell above or
below a critical pH
• Chemical to optical
− Trivial examples include pH indicator dyes.
− More selective examples include, for example, a proposal
to embed a binding site within a high-Q micro-scale
optical resonator tuned to an optical response peak of the
molecule to be detected
• Chemical to NMR
− A wide variety are available. Basically any reaction that
produces a product with a different NMR spectrum than
the reactant is a candidate. Particularly large shifts come
from large changes in the magnetic environment of the
protons visible in NMR (changing their proximity to
paramagnetic ions or to aromatic ring currents). This
potentially serves as a noninvasive readout mechanism
for medical applications.
• Chemical to electrical
− Trans-pore conductivity modulation (DNA sequencing)
− Adsorbed molecule effects on conductivity (e.g., on
SWCNTs)
• Molecular sensing
− Applies to any tight binding of a molecule to be sensed,
and could result in several modes of output. In general,
proteins are capable of strong selective binding.
Antibodies are the classic example. The binding can
result in a shape change, which can then trigger a variety
of read-out mechanisms.

• Mechanical to chemical
− Mechanochemical bond breaking (experimentally
demonstrated with an AFM)
− Modulation of steric effects, e.g., physically moving
blocking groups out of the path of reactants
• Mechanical to electrical
− The most dramatic example is the exponential sensitivity
of an STM tip, with around an order of magnitude/
angstrom dependence of transmitted current on position.
Within a MMCN, modulation of proximity between two
atomically precise conductors could provide a detection
mechanism of comparable sensitivity.
1.8 Energy Manipulation
1.8.1 Energy Storage

Important metrics for energy storage are (1) energy stored per unit
mass, (2) energy stored per unit volume, (3) rate of energy storage,
delivery, and (4) rate of energy loss while stored
In general, APM can be expected to weakly affect the first two

parameters (a kilogram of propane continues to yield the same energy
on oxidation as before, though oxidizing it in a fuel cell rather than in a
heat engine is beneficial). It strongly affects the third, which blends into
the subject of energy conversion. It can sometimes affect the fourth, if
the storage time is limited by a defect that APM can bypass (e.g., some
leakage paths in some capacitors).
1.8.2 Energy Conversion

Optoelectrical and Optochemical. Several potential components are
suited for bulk conversion of optical energy to electrical or chemical
energy.
• Direct bandgap nanocrystals such as II-VI compounds
(typically with an absorption pathlength ~1 micron)
• Silicon nanocrystals (with an absorption pathlength ~100
microns)
• TiO2 nanocrystals, notably for optically driven hydrogen
generation
• Organic pi-systems, including analogs to natural light
harvesting pigments such as chlorophyll and

bacteriorhodopsin, and donor/acceptor pairs as cited in the
signal transduction subsection
Electrochemical. Electrochemical processes (e.g., in fuel cells) depend

strongly on atomic and nanoscale features, which determine the rate of
transport of reactants and (through catalysis) the rate of their reactions.
Optimization of these structures can be expected to greatly increase the
power density and efficiency of fuel cells.
1.9 Photonics
1.9.1 Ordinary (Linear) Optical Components

APM will permit forming both reflecting and transmitting optics to
much finer tolerances than at present, and permit sharper bandpass and
bandstop filters using dielectric stacks, particularly at short wave-
lengths. Performance advantages in the X-ray region of the spectrum
are most promising.
1.9.2 Photonic Band Gap Materials

These are materials where a periodic pattern of refractive index changes
yields ranges of wavelengths where there is no direction in which light
can propagate. They require fabrication on a scale comparable to the
wavelength of the light involved, so they are within reach of semicon-
ductor lithography – but using these techniques for large or thick
structures is expensive and difficult. APM might be an alternative.
Advanced APM might also have an advantage in being able to inter-
weave materials with more extreme refractive index differences than
conventional fabrication can.
1.9.3 Metamaterials – Exotic Indices of Refraction

Electromagnetic responses of a dense array of conductive resonators
that are substantially smaller than the wavelength of their resonance
can be dramatically different from responses yielded by a uniform mix
of their constituent materials. In particular, it is possible to build
structures which respond as if they had a negative index of refraction.
These structures are desirable because they permit, among other
applications, lenses with better resolution than the normal diffraction
limit. Because these structures must behave as if they had a uniform
index of refraction, their components must be substantially smaller than
the wavelength of the light of interest, so fabrication requirements are
even more stringent than for photonic band gap materials. Conse-
quently, these resonators are natural applications for APM.

1.9.4 Nonlinear Transmission
One application area is protective goggles which stop a high power laser
pulse, but pass low power light with the same frequency. In this context,
APM would be useful primarily to provide improved materials. Some of
the materials are subject to damage from high intensities, and some of
this results from defects that APM could avoid.
1.9.5 Nonlinear Harmonic Generation

At high intensities, some materials convert light to its second harmonic,
effectively combining two photons into one. This is useful for a number
of reasons, amongst others because it is easier to obtain coherent light
at lower frequencies and this phenomenon provides a way to convert
this laser light to double the original frequency.
A number of small organic molecules have strong second harmonic

generation in isolation, notably some tetracyanoquinodimethane
(TCNQ) derivatives. These molecules can serve as components for
second harmonic generation. The primary difficulty in using these
molecules simply as crystals is that they have strong dipole moments,
and these dipole moments tend to align them into centrosymmetric
crystals, which cancels out the overall nonlinear polarization required
for second harmonic generation. APM could constrain the orientation
of these molecules, eliminating this difficulty. (See Cole and Kreiling,
2002.)
1.9.6 Controllable Absorption, Phase Modulation

Some of the components for these functions straddle the boundary
between components and systems. One of the options for a phase
modulation component, for instance, would simply be two pieces of
optically anisotropic material that are rotated in the path of a polarized
beam.
Components for controllable absorption can be as simple as

chromophores, which can be reduced or oxidized, forming or breaking
a conjugated pi system. Alternatively, simply twisting one single bond in
a series of conjugated double bonds can also reversibly partition the pi
system.
1.10 Topic 1 References

Baughman, Ray H.; Zakhidov, Anvar A.; and . de Heer, Walt A. 2002.
“Carbon Nanotubes—the Route Toward Applications,” Science, Vol.
297. no. 5582, pp. 787 – 792 (2 August 2002)
Blackledge, C.; Engebretson, D. A.; and McDonald, J. D. 2000.
“Nanoscale Site-Selective Catalysis of Surface Assemblies by Palladium-
Coated Atomic Force Microscopy Tips: Chemical Lithography without
Electrical Current,” Langmuir, 16 (22), 8317-8323, 2000.
Cao, Guozhong. 2004. Nanostructures and Nanomaterials: Synthesis,

Properties and Applications, 448pp, Imperial College Press, London,
UK, April 2004.
Chi, L. F.; Hartig, M.; Drechsler, T.; Schwaack, T.; Seidel, C.; Fuchs, H.;
and Schmid, G. 1998. “Single-electron tunneling in Au55 cluster
monolayers,” Applied Physics A Materials Science & Processing, Volume
66, Issue S1, pp. 187-190 (1998).
Cole, Jacqueline M.; and Kreiling, Stefan. 2002. “Exploiting

structure/property relationships in organic non-linear optical materials:
developing strategies to realize the potential of TCNQ derivatives”
CrystEngComm, 2002, 4(43), 232–238 DOI: 10.1039/b202287g.
Fréchet, Jean M. J. 2002. “Dendrimers and supramolecular chemistry,”

PNAS, Vol. 99, No. 8, 4782–4787 (April 16, 2002). Available online at
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/99/8/4782.
Ghosh, Asim K.; Nygaard, Jodie; and Hoek, Eric M. V. 2006. “Nano-
Structured Compaction Resistant Thin Film Composite Membranes,”
presented at 2006 Annual Meeting AIChE, San Francisco, CA.
Summary available on line at
http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2006/techprogram/P70132.HTM.
Guo, 2007. Patent description (unavailable). Agent: Mueting, Raasch &

Gebhardt, P.A. - Minneapolis, MN, US Inventor: Peixuan Guo Class:
435183000 (USPTO), C12N009/00 (Intl Class).
Hartgerink, Jeffrey D.; Granja, Juan R.; Milligan, Ronald A.; and Ghadiri,
M. Reza. 1996. “Self-Assembling Peptide Nanotubes,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
118, 43-50 (1996)
Hegg, Michael C.; and Lin, Lih Y.. 2007. A Nanocrystal Quantum Dot
Photodetector. Available on line at www.ee.washington.edu/research/
photonicslab/publications/NANODDS2007-HeggLin.pdf
Kastler, Marcel. 2006. Discotic Materials for Organic Electronics. Ph.D.

Dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany.
Kuo, Hong-Shi; Hwang, Ing-Shouh; Fu, Tsu-Yi; Lin, Yu-Chun; Chang,

Che-Cheng; and Tsong,Tien T. 2006. “Noble Metal/W(111) Single-
Atom Tips and Their Field Electron and Ion Emission Characteristics,”

Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 45, No. 11, 2006, pp. 8972-
8983. Available on line at http://jjap.ipap.jp/link?JJAP/45/8972/
LANL, 2002. Available on line at

http://cint.lanl.gov/docs/nanomech.pdf.
Lee, Doohan; Blakely, Jack M.; Schroeder, Todd W.; and Engstrom, J. R.
2001. A Growth Method for Creating Arrays of Atomically Flat Mesas
on Silicon. Available online at
http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~blakely/2001-01/apl00.pdf
Mathieu, Frederick; Liao, Shiping; Kopatsch, Jens; Wang, Tong; Mao,

Chengde; and Seeman, Nadrian C. 2005. Six-helix bundles designed
from DNA. Nano Letters 5, 661-665 (2005). Abstract available online at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl050084f.
Miura, K.; Kamiya S.; and Sasaki, N. 2003. Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Feb
7;90(5):055509. Epub 2003 Feb 7.
Mohammadzadegan, Reza; and Mohabatkar, Hassan. 2007 “Computer-

aided design of nano-filter construction using DNA self-assembly,”
Nanoscale Research Letters, Volume 2, Number 1, 24-27 (January 2007).
Nocera, Daniel G.; Wun, Aetna W.; Snee, Preston; and Somers, Becky.
2005. Optical Materials and Device Fabrication for Chemical Sensing on
the Nanoscale, Final Report, Defense Technical Information Center, 5
Apr 2004-14 Apr 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge Department of Chemistry, 15 pp. Available on line at
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA435965.
Northrop, Brian H. 2005. “Self-Assembling Interwoven and Interlocked

Dendrimer Architectures.” Available online at
http://organicdivision.org/essays_2005/Northrop.pdf
Peumans, P.; Bulovic´, V.; and Forrest, S. R. 2000. “Efficient photon

harvesting at high optical intensities in ultrathin organic double-
heterostructure photovoltaic diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, Volume
76, Number 19 (8 May 2000) 2650-2652.
Pokropivnyi, Vladimir V. 2001. Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics,

Volume 40, Numbers 11-12, pp. 582-594(13) (November 2001).
Pokropivnyi, Vladimir V. 2002. Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics,

Volume 41, Numbers 3-4, pp. 123-135(13) (March 2002).
Porod, Wolfgang; Lent, Craig S.; Bernstein, Gary H.; Orlov, Alexei O.;
Amlani, Islamshah; Snider, Gregory L.; and Merz, James L. 1999.

“Quantum-dot cellular automata: computing with coupled quantum
dots,” Int. J. Electronics, 1999, Vol. 86, No. 5, 549-590.
Rothemund, Paul W. K.; Ekani-Nkodo, Axel; Papadakis, Nick; Kumar,

Ashish; Fygenson, Deborah Kuchnir; and Winfree, Erik. 2004. “Design
and Characterization of Programmable DNA Nanotubes.” Journal of the
American Chemical Society 126, 16344-16352 (2004). Abstract available
online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja044319l.
Roy, Soumyajit. 2006. “A Guided Tour to the World of Molybdates,”

National University of Singapore, Department of Chemistry, Invited
Lecture Series 2006.
Tian, Ye; and Mao, Chengde. 2004. “Molecular Gears: A Pair of DNA
Circles Continuously Rolls against Each Other,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126
(37), 11410 -11411, 2004. Web Release Date: August 26, 2004; available
on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja046507h.
unkn#01. refs: Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1497; Dalton Trans. 2003, 1;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2446
unkn#02. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanowires
Vicario, Javier; Walko, Martin; Meetsma, Auke; and Feringa, Ben L.

2006. “Fine Tuning of the Rotary Motion by Structural Modification in
Light-Driven Unidirectional Molecular Motors,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128
(15), 5127 -5135, 2006. 10.1021/ja058303m S0002-7863(05)08303-4.
Yurke, Bernard; Turberfield, Andrew J.; Mills, Allen P. Jr,; Simmel,

Friedrich C.; and Neumann, Jennifer L. 2000. “A DNA-fuelled
molecular machine made of DNA,” Nature 406, 605-608 (2000).
Available on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35020524
Zettl Research Group, 2007. Available on line at

http://www.physics.berkeley.edu/research/zettl/projects/BNtubes.html.

Topic 2 Systems and Frameworks
2.1 Introduction
This topic gives a survey of a range of atomically precise systems and
subsystems that can serve roles in nanosystems engineering and its
applications. It aims to give a sense of the breadth of functional system
requirements and potential implementation technologies for physical
systems able to satisfy those requirements.
A “system,” as distinct from a “component,” is taken to be a physical

structure that is fabricated from multiple distinct parts to achieve a
functional purpose. Discussion of systems inevitably involves their
design, their components and methods for their fabrication and
assembly, hence this section has a degree of overlap with the others.
Particular attention is given to atomically precise productive

nanosystems (APPNs), owing to their potential role in enabling the
fabrication of a wide range of advanced AP systems. Since APPNs are
tools for fabrication, this discussion inevitably overlaps with, and relies
on, topics explored further in the section on fabrication.
Importantly, the discussion of productive nanosystems delineates and

distinguishes among distinct classes and generations of APPN
development. Early generations and classes embrace systems that may
be appropriate as stretch objectives for development based on current
fabrication capabilities, while others would require one or more
generations of intermediate APPN development for their realization.
These advanced but currently inaccessible objectives are appropriate
targets for exploratory design and modeling. This is of value because it
can help to motivate, support, and guide ongoing research by clarifying
the longer-term payoffs that can be expected from the pursuit of
appropriate enabling technologies.
2.2 Structural Frameworks
2.2.1 Background
The ability to build atomically precise frameworks for organizing
components is fundamental to atomically precise manufacturing (APM)
of all kinds, and to the development of productive nanosystems. Also
important is the ability to interface precise frameworks and
components with imprecise structures, such as nanolithographically
patterned substrates and circuits.

This overview describes several approaches and technologies applicable
to this problem. Some technologies (e.g., large-scale patterned atomic
layer epitaxy and structural DNA) have the potential to implement
complex structures directly, while other technologies (for example,
magic-size quantum dots and small-scale patterned atomic layer
epitaxy) have the potential to play roles as components in composite
nanosystems. The latter approach, in which some technologies provide
a modular, extensible framework, while others provide diverse
functional components, has been a useful organizing concept in
envisioning directions for atomically precise functional systems.
A key distinction in what follows is between structures that are modular

and those that are not. As used here “modular” refers to structures that
are composed of many components that can be put together in many
different ways (defining a large, combinatorial design space). Examples
of modular components include monomers in polymers, and atoms or
other growth species in solid structures made by tip-directed synthesis.
If a set of monomers, for example, has M members, then the number of
possible structures for a chain of length N is MN. For proteins, a typical
number would be 20300. The size of this design space, together with the
diverse properties of the 20 amino acid monomers, is what makes it
possible to find protein molecules that bind selectively to any of a vast
set of other structures.
2.2.2 Frameworks Made Using Tip-Directed APM

Fabrication techniques that use top down computer controlled
nanopositioning devices to create atomically precise patterns on crystal
surfaces, such as patterned atomic-layer epitaxy (P/ALE), are presently
in an early exploratory stage, but can be expected to enable the fabrica-
tion of structures of roughly similar size and complexity, with tempera-
ture and stability metrics comparable to those of semiconductor devices
and costs. For patterned ALE of Si structures, atomically precise
patterns defined on a Si wafer will be the framework for fabrication.
Throughput for early-generation systems will be comparable to those of
other direct-write processing systems, which operate on a feature-by-
feature basis, rather than performing wafer-scale patterning via mask-
based processes. Use of MEMS based nanopositioning systems should
allow for a significantly higher level of parallelism than is available in
typical semiconductor direct write systems, but the fact that individual
“pixels” are atoms will result in very limited throughput on initial APM
systems of this sort. This suggests costs per device substantially above
those achieved by commercial semiconductor processes, hence high-
value applications that take specific advantage of atomic precision. Top
down controlled scanning probe fabrication techniques (such as

patterned ALE) have the potential to create atomically precise
structures that can include designed three-dimensional connectors.
Top Down Designed Modular Structures. Patterned ALE and other

top down controlled APM techniques can draw on the many decades of
experience in the material science and design of semiconductors,
insulators, and metals used in microelectronics, MEMS, photovoltaics,
and optoelectronics. These material systems provide a much wider
range of material properties and operating conditions than DNA or
proteins. Since these top down fabrication techniques employ directed
assembly from the start, there will be a bias to continue with directed
assembly to generate larger and more complex products. However,
there is an opportunity to use designed modular structures produced
with top down approaches in self-assembly schemes.
Currently most proposed top down controlled approaches to APM

attempt to build on covalent crystalline structures. The advantages of
this method include robust materials that are “simple” (compared to
proteins) with well understood material properties.
A well ordered, stiff, covalent crystal structure carries with it some

disadvantages. To change material properties within a given structure
usually requires a change of crystal structure, lattice constant, or both.
There is considerable experience in heteroepitaxy to draw on, but
lattice mismatch will create strain, which can distort structures
complicating their design when a specific atomically precise shape is
required for inter-connectivity.
There is a possibility to use individual modular components that are

each of an individual homogeneous material designed to couple with
modular components of different materials. This approach would result
in necessarily simpler modular structures but would avoid the lattice
mismatch problem.
Perhaps the largest advantage top down designed modular structures

have is that, with the freedom to design arbitrary structures that are in
principle only constrained by the lattice structure and some surface
atom reconstruction, combined with the well understood properties of
the lattice, the design space can be very well defined and can evolve with
improved technologies in the same manner that integrated circuit
design rules have evolved to create ever more valuable products.

2.2.3 Frameworks Based on Atomically Precise Self-
Assembled Structures
Several of the approaches below exploit biomolecular components to
build APSA frameworks, and a brief overview of some properties and
metrics may be in order. The state of the art in biomolecular systems
provides frameworks with sizes of 100 x 100 nm or more and com-
plexities of >10,000 bits. Their processing and operating temperatures
are typically <100°C, with stability depending strongly on details of
structure and environmental conditions. If they are used as scaffolds for
organizing non-biomolecular components that subsequently bind or
fuse to one another, the products could potentially have far wider
temperature and environmental tolerances. Costs for experimental
quantities of material are high (the dollars-per-milligram range), but
experience with large-scale production in the biotechnology industry
suggests that costs can be greatly reduced in many instances (the
dollars-per-kilogram range). For 100 nm scale devices, $1000 dollars per
kilogram equates to a materials cost of approximately $10–15 per device.
This is substantially below the cost per device achieved by the com-
mercial semiconductor industry, which are on the rough order of $10–9,
suggesting the potential for products that are competitive in
information storage and processing.
Crystal Surfaces. As discussed above, patterned crystal surfaces

provide an approach to the fabrication of large, extremely rigid
framework structures. With suitable patterning, these can serve as a
basis for APSA, with multiple distinct surface patterns to direct and
align self-assembly of potentially complex structures.
DNA Origami Unpatterned crystal surfaces have the potential to serve as supports and
stiffeners for epitaxial APSA of a broad class of structures. These struc-
The concept of “Unique tures would have internal features that provide specific and potentially
Addressing”—components complex patterns of self-assembly, while the crystal surface would pro-
in which information is vide a basis for long-range alignment and precise control of distances.
encoded in structure. In
the prime example of DNA DNA Frameworks. DNA, most familiar as a genetic molecule, can be
frameworks, the program used to build 3D structures. In these structures, segments of double
for assembly is encoded in
helix are held together by strands that swap from one helix to another,
forming “junctions.” A striking example is Dr. Paul Rothemund’s DNA
the structure and thereby
origami technology, reported in Nature in early 2006. For this first
is the same size as the
paper, he designed and fabricated many different 100-nm scale,
structure. The goal is a
atomically precise structures, using design methods that consistently
programmable system yielded the intended structure on the first attempt. Setting aside the
towards a generalizable time required to obtain synthetic DNA oligomers by postal order, the
self-assembly. time required to design and make a new structure of this sort is
approximately one day.
DNA engineering technologies (termed “structural DNA nano-
technology”) now provide a reliable way to build large (million-atom
range), complex, atomically precise frameworks. Fabrication is
straightforward. DNA can be synthesized or obtained from bio-
engineered organisms. In the DNA origami approach, these DNA
components are dissolved and mixed in a hot buffer solution and they
self assemble as the solution is slowly cooled.
DNA has only four kinds of monomers; these are bulky and similar to
one another, and can form only a relatively narrow range of structural
motifs. Consequently, DNA nanotechnologies enable only relatively
coarse-grained control of molecular shapes and surface properties.
While DNA nanotechnologies make possible large, intricate, easy-to-
design, easy-to-make structures, the nature of the material limits its
utility for many other applications. This limitation is addressed by the
MMCN approach described below. It is further mitigated by the Proteins to Interface
availability of hundreds of synthetic DNA analogs with diverse
Bio-Proteins
backbones: Like DNA, these polymers can bind by means Watson-Crick
base pairing, yet they can display more diverse surfaces and covalently
The goal of Baker Lab
attached functional elements. Thus, synthetic DNA analogs provide
another family of modular molecular materials for use in MMCN design work is a general protocol
and fabrication. for design of proteins that
will bind to natural
In terms of distinct, addressable attachment points, resolution of the proteins. An example
structures that Rothemund has been able to construct with DNA is 3.5 would be an artificial
nm by 6 nm, set by inter-strand spacing, and by the distance between antibody aimed at a pre-
junctions on a strand. Important to remember for interfacing of the chosen face of an analyte
structures is the three-dimensional nature of the helical structure of the protein—engineerable for
DNA. The yield of his structures has exceeded 80 or 90% in some cases increased function,
and is largely dependent on the integrity of the DNA scaffold used. stability, etc.
Arbitrary patterns of DNA can be created and these may be marked
with chemical labels.
Funding for structural DNA nanotechnology is modest, estimated to

support approximately 200 researchers and students world wide. An
important focus from the perspective of advanced functional nano-
systems will be to extend DNA engineering to additional geometries
and to use it to organize other parts in a precise way. Challenges include
better characterization and control of defect rates in self-assembled
DNA structures.
Protein Components. Protein engineering is an emerging design

domain for a class of complex, atomically precise objects several
nanometers in size. Unlike DNA, proteins can be designed to have a
wide range of molecular-scale shapes and surface properties. DNA has a
bulky sugar backbone with a choice of four large side-chains (the bases),

all similar to one another. Protein, by contrast, has a slim backbone with
a choice of 20 side chains of many sizes, shapes, charges, and chemical
properties. Proteins are polymers that typically have strengths and
rigidities like those of polycarbonates, epoxies, and similar polymeric
engineering materials. Silk has been used to make bullet-proof vests. In
biology, proteins and self-assembled structures using proteins serve a
wide range of functions, acting as structural components, catalysts,
motors, and photochemical energy conversion devices.
Many natural proteins bind other molecules in precise ways. Of

significance in composite systems, proteins can readily be made that
bind to DNA double helices in specific locations, recognizing a
sequence of base pairs from the side, without unzipping the helix.
In combination with nucleic acid polymers, protein molecules imple-

ment the naturally occurring productive nanosystems in cells. Both
ribosomes and DNA polymerases use digital data to direct the assembly
of small building blocks into specified sequences. The ability to engineer
both proteins and nucleic acids can evidently be extended to enable the
design and fabrication of productive nanosystems at this level of
capability.
Protein Structures and Useful Properties. These properties enable proteins to provide
Components mechanically stiff interfaces to DNA, providing a basis for integrating
protein engineering and DNA engineering to form an expanded, more
Lessons have been learned capable design domain. Further, because proteins can bind other
from the study of amyloid molecules in precise ways, they can serve as a kind of atomically precise
fibers—responsible for “glue” that self-assembles other structures to DNA (or other things) in a
many diseases including precise position and orientation. Dr. Angela Belcher has shown that
Alzheimer’s. In these fibers peptides (the material proteins are made of) can be developed that bind
beta-strands from different specifically to different surfaces, including semiconductors.
protein monomers interact
Limitations. Protein engineering is advancing, but the technology is far
to form beta-sheets. The
from mature. Current design technology for proteins has only a moder-
goal of research by Dr.
ate success rate in producing novel molecules that are stable and have
Ingemar André is de novo an intended function. For example, the rate of success on a first try is on
protein architecture the order of 50% for achieving stability. The success rate for making a
design: such as nanotubes, structure with a specific function is lower, and depends on the design
2D hexagonal arrays, objective. Successful projects have often required multiple redesigns.
ligand-induced virus
capsids, novel shapes, and Limitations Relative to DNA.
moving proteins (motors). • Size: Proteins are far smaller than recent DNA structures,
being only a few nanometers in size (the thousand-atom
range), rather than hundreds of nanometers and millions of
atoms.

• Defect rates: Protein molecules are synthesized by ribosomes
with error rates of 10-5 to 10-4 per amino acid added. DNA, by
contrast, can be synthesized in biological systems with error
rates of 10–9 or less (error rates in chemical synthesis are far
higher). The error rate in protein synthesis greatly limits the
size and yield of perfect, atomically precise protein objects.
(Purification and defect tolerance are important mitigating
strategies.) Much of the current work
in protein engineering
• Design: relative to DNA, it is harder to design new structures focuses on modifying
that will be stable and have the intended properties. Current existing functional
design technology for proteins has only a moderate success
structures, for example, to
rate in producing novel molecules that are stable and have an
stabilize enzymes for
intended function. Successful projects have often required
industrial use. This
multiple redesigns.
circumvents the problems
• Synthesis: biological production through genetic engineering associated with engineer-
is necessary and takes many weeks. Chemical synthesis of ing new functions directly.
proteins is impractical, while synthesis of DNA strands of These and other modified
adequate length is easy and fast (hours).
biological devices could be
• Stability: in water, typical proteins are less stable than DNA, useful in composite nano-
both physically and chemically. Artificial proteins, however, systems, but more as
can have greater physical stability than typical natural functional components
proteins, and design for increased chemical stability shows than as structural
promise. Stability can be increased by changing the chemical components or “glue”.
medium. Requirements can be relaxed by using biomolecules
only as temporary scaffolding.
These limitations motivate limiting the use of protein-based

components to functions where their special properties are necessary,
using DNA for most structural purposes. The two materials have
complementary capabilities.
Some problems of stability and function may be reduced in composite

nanosystems applications, however, because binding to a comple-
mentary structure tends to stabilize a protein (by stabilizing the form
that does the binding), and because adhesion that is based on multiple
binding interactions will be less sensitive to unexpected weakness in any
single interaction. Further, the requirements for interfacing to a
functional component are less stringent than those of providing a
function directly.
Funding of protein engineering is primarily focused on the narrower

field that modifies biological proteins to modify their functions.
Challenges include refining design technologies to increase the success
rate for achieving stability and specificity of binding.

To enable routine use of protein building blocks in MMCN develop-
ment will require facilities organized to provide higher throughput in
the design, fabrication, and test cycle for novel structures of relatively
standard kinds. A focus on developing capabilities for combining
specific DNA binding with specific binding of small inorganic structures
will be of particular importance.
Synthetic Modular Molecular Structures. Synthetic methods can be

used to make a wide variety of modular molecular systems, although
these capabilities are currently less developed than those of protein and
DNA engineering. Accessible structures today are polymers, typically
made by means of stepwise synthesis on solid supports. Atomically
precise patterning of surfaces by means of scanning probe systems also
provides a way to arrange subunits in a combinatorially large set of
designed patterns, and hence also fits the definition of "modular" used
in this document. Looking forward, the development of productive
nanosystems is expected to enable the synthesis of an increasingly broad
set of modular molecular systems. The early prospects include non-
biological polymers. Later prospects include structures with dense two-
and three-dimensional networks of covalent bonds.
Typical polymer molecules adopt loose, fluctuating, randomly coiled

conformations in solution. The molecular polymers of greatest interest
in the present context are those that can be designed to fold back on
themselves and collapse to form specific three-dimensional objects akin
to proteins and structures engineered using DNA. Structures of this
kind, sometimes termed "foldamers," are candidates for use as building
blocks in self-assembling systems, provided that they can be designed to
display surfaces with shapes and molecular properties complementary
to those of other surfaces. A recent achievement is the engineering of a
protein-like folded structure built from beta (rather than alpha) amino
acids.
Some polymer molecules have substantial rigidity and maintain specific

(or greatly constrained) shapes in solution. Most form straight rods or
helixes, which sharply limits their utility as modular components for
self-assembling structures, but polymers constructed from monomers
that include a diversity of shapes have broader applicability. A polymer-
building system of this kind is under development (discussed elsewhere)
and has been shown to enable the design of molecules with a
combinatorially large range of shapes and surface properties, and to do
so without the necessity of folding first.
Synthetic monomers have relatively few constraints on their structures.

They can carry diverse side-chains, some of which can be reactive
groups that serve as “handles” for attaching other molecular structures

at a later time. Those with greater rigidity can contribute greater rigidity
to self-assembled structures, thereby decreasing the amplitude of
thermal fluctuations. Within a particular chain-building technology, the
design domain can be expanded by expanding the library of available
monomeric building blocks. This is a task that could easily be pursued
by multiple, loosely coordinated research groups, with additive results.
A natural application of early-generation productive nanosystems will Schafmeister Polymeric

be to facilitate the design and fabrication of synthetic modular Structures
molecular systems, much as ribosomes and DNA polymerases do for
the naturally occurring modular systems. Natural objectives include the Bis peptides are rigidified
synthesis of stiffer polymers, or of more advanced structures with dense into an oligomer that has
two- or three-dimensional networks of covalent bonds. Productive no rotatable bonds within
nanosystems with these capabilities would further expand the molecular its core structure and its
nanosystems design domain by enabling the design and use of new shape is determined by the
modular molecular structures with superior materials properties. structure, sequence and
stereochemistry of its
Advantages of stiff polymeric structures
building blocks. Bis-amino
• Improved thermodynamics for self assembly. Folding or acids are coupled through
binding a flexible molecule reduces its entropy by confining pairs of bonds to create
it to a smaller part of its configuration space. bis-peptides.
Thermodynamically, this opposes self-assembly. Stiffer
polymers have lower entropy to begin with, which favors
assembly.
• Stiffness may make the design process more straightforward.
Because the parts have a definite shape, there is less chance
that they can assume a conformation that can bind
incorrectly.
• Greater stiffness in the polymer will tend to result in greater
stiffness in the final structure. Because increasing stiffness
reduces the amplitude of thermal fluctuations in the
molecular configuration, it can help in building nanosystems
with good control of component geometry.
2.2.4 Modular Molecular Composite Nanosystems (MMCNs)

To return to considerations specific to particular technologies, the
emerging technology of modular molecular composite nanosystems
(MMCNs) provides a way to integrate diverse nanoscale components to
form complex, atomically precise systems. (DNA frameworks of the sort
discussed below are revisited from a different point of view in Topic 3
Fabrication and Synthesis Methods.)
The MMCN technology discussed here aims to exploit the

complementary strengths of three areas of research:
1. DNA engineering, which can rapidly design and build 3D
frameworks that provide hundreds to thousands of uniquely
addressable locations.
2. Protein engineering, which can make precisely tailored

interfaces between DNA and a wide range of other, more
specialized structures.
3. Special structures, which include components from all areas of

nanotechnology that deliver high levels of functionality but resist
systematic design.
To direct the atomically precise self-assembly of complex structures,

building blocks must have many unique, atomically precise
complementary interfaces. However, many potentially useful
components (magic-size quantum dots, nanotube segments,
spontaneously formed crystal-surface features...) are non-modular and
have fixed surface structures that cannot be expected to fit other
surfaces of interest. In MMCNs, however, modular molecular structures
can compensate for this limitation by enabling designers to build an
effectively infinite number of distinct, precisely tailored complementary
interfaces.
Table 2-1. Characteristics of emerging MMCN technologies.

Scale Modularity Surfaces Functions
Structural DNA Framework 102 to 103 nm Nucleotides Semi-regular
Proteins 2 to 10 nm Amino Acids Diverse Binding, other
Synthetic chains 1 to ? nm Diverse Diverse Binding, other
Patterned ALE 1 to 5 nm Atomic Diverse Diverse
3
Special structures 1 to 10 nm Little or none Specific Very Diverse
7
Nanolithography 1 to 10 nm Imprecise Imprecise
Putting It Together: The MMCN Perspective. The range of molecular

technologies outlined above includes several that meet the test for being
design domains, or at least emerging design domains. All are modular
molecular systems. DNA engineering is the most mature; protein
engineering is established, but less mature, and the synthetic systems
both through a chemical synthesis route and a top down positional
fabrication approach are still emerging. Special structures, as meant
here, are products of science-intensive research that involves only a very
limited scope for reliable, systematic design. (Some of these functional
structures result from work guided by a scientific insight, and some
were found by accident.)

Each of these areas can produce structures of value by themselves, but
their strengths and weaknesses indicate that they can be combined to
form the basis for a broader design domain that produces composite
structures.
• A natural role for DNA is as a structural framework for other
components. Broad classes of DNA structures have become
easy to design and make. In this role, the limited adaptability
of DNA structures with respect to fine-grained shape and
surface properties is unimportant. Different DNA sequences,
though buried in the center of the helix, can nonetheless
provide markers for distinct locations to which other
structures can selectively bind. This makes locations in a
framework addressable.
• A natural role for the more adaptable protein and synthetic
structures is to recognize and bind to distinct locations on
DNA frameworks (zinc finger proteins have already been
engineered to do this). With one surface anchored to a
specific location in a framework, the other surfaces can
either provide functionality directly, or can serve as selective
binding sites adapted to fit special structures. An important
research question will be to establish how closely multiple
proteins can be spaced on nearby locations before special
measures are needed in their design to account for lateral
interactions.
• A natural role for special structures is to provide functional
properties that can be exploited in novel ways when multiple
structures are held in predictable orientations and positioned
with respect to one another with great accuracy. (The
positioning accuracy, on a moment-by-moment basis, is
limited by thermal fluctuations). A major constraint on the
use of special structures is that they must be soluble (or form
stable colloidal suspensions) in solvents and chemical
conditions compatible with the other elements of the
composite system. Solubility engineering will often be
crucial.
Structures produced by top down methods have much in common with

special structures in their range of functions, yet structure engineering
principles can be applied to take advantage of their fine-grained
modularity to create specific connectors that are designed to dock with
designed sockets. A natural role for top down fabricated nanostructures
is where material properties are required that are difficult or impossible
to achieve with DNA or protein structures.

Notably, DNA frameworks with sizes of 100 nm or more already
overlap the size range of features fabricated in commercial
semiconductor manufacturing. This suggests the prospect of designing
and building patterns (including 3D patterns) of nanoscale functional
elements that can bind and interface to active semiconductor
nanosystems.
Looking forward, the MMCN approach promises to enable the

production of devices that can bind, join, and release other molecular
building blocks, fabricating new components. These operations can
expand the repertory of available components (both modular and
special) for building next-generation MMCNs. To the extent that these
devices can be seen as programmable, they satisfy the definition of
productive nanosystems. Continued advances in the quality of
components, the capabilities of APPNs, and the introduction of
mechanically directed component assembly can provide stepping stones
along a family of pathways to advanced APPNs as a basis for atomically
precise manufacturing.
Global investment in special, highly functional nanoscale components

now totals many billions of dollars. A premise of this investment has
been the expected utility of systems built from these components. The
ability to juxtapose many different kinds of highly functional nanoscale
components in complex spatial patterns can be expected to leverage
this investment by enabling fabrication of the kinds of systems that
motivated it in the first place.
The MMCN concept includes research that is already underway, but it

provides a new way to see that research in a broader strategic context.
This perspective highlights ways in which diverse areas of research are
complementary rather than competitive, and shows why advances in
any one of them increase the value of research programs in all the rest.
The MMCN concept emerged late in the roadmap development
process, and will provide a useful framework for organizing future
roadmapping efforts and next-generation research in self-assembling
AFNs.
2.3 Machinery, Active Positioning Systems

There are many potential roles for mechanisms that drive the motion of
nanoscale components and subsystems:
• To expose or protect active surfaces such as binding sites
• To position catalytic sites at specific locations where one
wishes to form or break bonds

• To modulate resonant transfer of energy between
chromophores in optical systems
• To use mechanical positioning to direct molecular reactivity
to specific site (without resorting to protecting groups).
• To position components to construct systems that are
beyond the scale and complexity possible with pure self-
assembly.
• To move a nanosystem as a whole from one location to
another, e.g., in medical applications
The requirements for constructing such systems may include:

A significant milestone
• Motor components accurately bound to atomically precise that appears feasible for
structural members the near term would be the
• Motors that can be stopped and started on command. construction of a DNA-
based Stewart platform.
• Multiple motors actuating distinct mechanisms able to start
Since DNA actuators have
and stop their motors independently. An existing example is
been demonstrated that
an actuator “fueled” by a DNA strand, specific to the
are sequence-specific and
particular actuator.
therefore site-addressable,
Systems based on DNA structures have been designed that satisfy each it appears straightforward
of these requirements (albeit at low operating speeds and in a restricted to incorporate 6 of these
environment). The mechanism used to accomplish this is selective actuators in a DNA
binding and displacement of various short DNA strands, resulting in octahedron and to
large changes in structural geometry in response to the addition or demonstrate full control
removal of strands from the solution environment. over a set of rigid body
coordinates at a
In top-down fabricated atomically precise nanostructures, the challenge
nanometer scale (albeit
of constructing a system with multiple independently controllable
with binary control, not
actuators is in some ways simpler and in some ways more difficult. At
full analog control, of each
the microscale, CMOS controlled MEMS actuators can be arrayed to
degree of freedom).
create a modest amount of parallelism. However, the technology to
create nanoscale actuators that would have top down control and
atomic resolution has yet to be demonstrated. One path that could
produce such nanoscale actuators would be to use the emerging
macro/micro scaled ATM tools to create such nanoscale actuators.
However, the required ability to create insulators, conductors, and
sacrificial layers must first be developed. Once these material
capabilities are developed, the whole spectrum of MEMS (or more
appropriately NEMS) design and construction (actuators, cantilevers,
etc) becomes accessible. In addition, these materials would immediately
allow the independent control of multiple actuators by merely including
connections to separate insulated wires, a simpler and higher
bandwidth approach than using the diffusion of multiple DNA strands.

2.4 Productive Nanosystems
Atomically precise productive nanosystems are AP nanosystems that
can be used to make any of a wide variety of structures under
programmable control. Ribosomes and nucleic acid polymerases are
examples found in nature. Metrics for productive nanosystems include:
• Block placement cycle time
• Error rate in placement
• Specific throughput (output rate per unit mass)
• Information content of products
• Metrics of the products themselves.
2.4.1 Major Subsystem Requirements

Productive nanosystems (present and projected) form a spectrum at
least as broad as that of historical electronics, which has advanced from
primitive crystal-diode radio receivers to teraflop computers. This
spectrum can be divided roughly into early-, intermediate-, and
advanced-generation systems.
Anticipated early-generation systems of one class resemble nanoscale

systems found in biology today. After multiple intermediate technology
generations, anticipated advanced-generation systems resemble
automated factories with macroscale assembly systems fed with parts
produced by macroscopic arrays of coordinated microscale productive
systems that are themselves based on nanoscale components. The
subsystems required for these are, of course, radically different, and
their requirements must not be confused.
The paragraphs that follow consider some of the major functions that
must be served in a productive nanosystem, and the kinds of subsystems
required to implement them. In early-generation systems, the answer is
often “nothing required.”
System Architectures. The overall system architecture will depend on

the technology generation of the APPN in question, and on its specific
applications.
Anticipated early-generation systems are of two basic kinds, although

innovative ideas may broaden this conception. One kind, associated
with tip-directed fabrication pathways, relies on mechanical conveyance
and positional assembly to move parts; the other, associated with self-
assembly based fabrication pathways, relies on diffusion for this

purpose. In either case, early-generation APPNs are anticipated to have
little parallelism and correspondingly simple architectures.
Anticipated advanced-generation systems are expected to converge on

mechanical conveyance and positional assembly, which are favored by
considerations of reliability, control, efficiency, product scope, and so
forth. Advantages of this approach are strongly indicated by exercises in
design and modeling of different kinds of components and subsystems.
It must be emphasized, however, that these prospective advantages in
no way force early- or intermediate-generation systems to have these
features, and they are in no sense requirements or defining criteria for
productive nanosystems.
Control of Operating Environments. In early-generation systems,

APPN mechanisms are expected to operate exposed to an ambient
environment, which has its temperature and composition controlled by
external means. The APPN itself requires no subsystem that performs
this task.
Paths through intermediate to advanced systems entail greater control

of the environment, and at some point, transfer of more responsibility
for that control to the APPN-based system. At the advanced end of the
spectrum, control entails rigorous exclusion of unwanted molecules by
barriers and control of transport through them. Only macroscale
systems will require internal means for transport and rejection of waste
heat; temperatures of nanoscale and microscale systems will
characteristically be closely coupled to the surrounding medium.
Feedstock Distribution. In early-generation systems, APPN

mechanisms are expected to work with feedstock molecules transported
for capture (by a tool-tip or a deprotected reaction site) by diffusion
from the ambient environment (a gas or liquid). The APPN itself
requires no internal subsystem that performs a distribution task. Local
capture mechanisms suffice.
Paths through intermediate to advanced systems entail increasing the

control of feedstock distribution, as a requirement both of tighter
control of operating environments and of the objectives of greater
speed, reliability, and diversity of fabrication operations. This entails
capture and subsequent transport. Separation of these functions can
buffer internal mechanisms from statistical fluctuations in the timing of
feedstock molecule capture. In macroscale APPN-based systems, as in
conventional macroscale factories, the paths and control of
transportation can become complex.
Power distribution. In early-generation, ribosome-class systems,

“power distribution” is a consequence of the delivery of chemical free
energy together with feedstock molecules (which may be in bound
forms). No internal “power distribution system” is required. Local
energy coupling mechanisms suffice.
Along paths through intermediate to advanced systems (and perhaps in

early-generation systems on tip-directed fabrication paths), energy
sources will perform multiple functions, requiring some form of power
distribution. Along the path to advanced-generation systems, these
subsystems again become complex, requiring transport over
macroscopic distances and distribution to a large array of productive
mechanisms. Electrical power distribution has been examined and
appears adequate. Energy in chemical form is a natural alternative
choice.
Information distribution. In early-generation systems with a single

point of activity, the problem reduces to one of external distribution of
information to the devices themselves, which can be accomplished by
any of several means (e.g., information molecules like nucleic acids, or
modulation of light, pressure, or electric fields). No internal distribution
of control information is necessary, because an external “broadcast”
mechanism will suffice.
Again, advances lead to a requirement for more internal structure. At

some point, multiple devices must perform different, simultaneous
operations at different locations. This entails a communication network
subsystem, and can benefit greatly from the use of locally stored
instruction sequences, and even computation. Mechanical or electrical
means appear adequate for information distribution in practical
systems. There is the opportunity to use the same distribution channel
for delivery of both information and power. For instance the
information can be encoded as a modulation of the power delivered to
the individual units.
The requirements on the information distribution subsystem will be

strongly determined by the system architecture and complexity, and the
system-level problems are of kinds familiar to manufacturing engineers
and to programmers of parallel-processing computers.
Handling Finished Products. In solution-phase, early-generation

systems, a natural approach is to simply release products that are
themselves designed for self-assembly (or for “folding” of a chain of
linked blocks). This avoids any requirement for a subsystem that
handles products.
Along paths through intermediate to advanced systems (and perhaps in

early-generation systems on tip-directed fabrication paths), product
handling requires transportation, and in larger systems, the
transportation network can become complex. Anticipated macroscale
APPN-based manufacturing systems employ microscale transport
systems to bring small blocks together to make larger blocks, as part of a
hierarchical process that results in the assembly of macroscale products
from parts of substantial size. The required architectures again involve
problems of kinds familiar to manufacturing engineers and to
programmers of parallel-processing computers.
2.4.2 Natural Productive Nanosystems

Biological productive nanosystems include:
• Ribosomes, which convert information in RNA into proteins
• RNA polymerase, which translates DNA into RNA
• Reverse transcriptase, which translates RNA into DNA
• DNA polymerase, which copies DNA to DNA
• RNA dependent RNA polymerase, which copies RNA to
RNA
Some metrics that describe the operation of ribosomes are:

• Placement frequency 20 s–1
• Error rate 10–5 to 10–4
• Specific productivity ~10–3 s–1 (this is the reciprocal of the
time required for the system to produce a mass of product
equal to the mass of the system itself).
• Block size 110 Daltons
• Metrics for products—maximum size ~105 Daltons; Young’s
modulus ~109 N/m2; information content ~4 kbits;
maximum temperature ~100°C.
2.4.3 Synthetic Productive Nanosystems

There are several different approaches to producing atomically precise
3D structures. The following paragraphs describe potential stages and
system-features on pathways that lead from early- to advanced-
generation APPNs and APPN-based productive systems, together with
some ideas that have been considered in connection with the
implementation of early-generation systems.
Ribosome-Class Artificial Systems. As with natural ribosomes,

systems of this class would combine a series of selected monomers in a
one dimensional chain and rely on non-covalent interactions between

the carefully selected monomers to fold them into the desired 3D
geometry.
Nadrian Seeman has developed a system that is constructed of DNA, is

programmed by adding strands of DNA, and builds any of several
output strands according to its programming. In its current version, the
device cannot select individual base pairs to be joined, but only short
sequences of base pairs; however, it can build up to four different strand
patterns. Seeman has expressed an interest in building similar DNA-
based machines that can control the fabrication of other polymers.
2D and 3D Polymeric Component Builders. It is useful to make a

distinction between productive nanosystems capable of building 1D
polymers, and systems capable of building 2D or 3D polymeric
components. (Strictly speaking, the components will be oligomers since
an atomically precise component has a fixed number of monomers in a
fixed arrangement with fixed terminations.) The latter is a desirable
research goal for a number of reasons, including:
• Because the higher dimensional polymers use covalent bonds
in more of their structure, the design problem is reduced in
complexity. The structures have fewer thermally accessible
degrees of conformational freedom. This simplifies the
design space search needed to avoid misfolding.
• Also because of the additional covalent bonds in their
structures, these polymers can have better mechanical
properties than 1D polymers.
2D and 3D Component Construction via a Self-Assembled

Productive System. Constructing 2D and 3D oligomers with atomic
precision is a challenging research enterprise. Two strategies that
suggest approaches towards this goal as an outgrowth of MMCN
systems are:
1. For each step of the synthetic process

• bind an MMCN DNA/protein/catalyst system to a
particular location on a workpiece
• catalyze a reaction which deposits a monomer with
multiple covalent bonds on the selected location on the
workpiece from a water-soluble precursor
• unbind, apply a solution of the next MMCN system to
deposit the monomer, and repeat.
A major challenge of this approach would be to achieve sufficient

productivity for practical applications

2. For each step in an alternate synthetic process
• bind an MMCN DNA/protein/catalyst stepper system to
a particular location on a workpiece
• actuate the stepper to move the catalytic site to the next
location for monomer deposition
• catalyze a reaction which deposits a monomer with
multiple covalent bonds on the selected location on the
workpiece from a water-soluble precursor
• without moving the MMCN system as a whole, use the
stepper to move the catalytic site
• repeat the last two steps until all sites accessible to the
MMCN’s actuators have been processed
One challenge in this approach would be to control the molecular

steppers in the MMCN to properly place each monomer in its site.
One known technique of actuating multiple motors independently is
to use the binding of site-specific DNA strands to drive the motors.
An alternate approach to separate control is to use light,
temperature, pressure, and the electric field perpendicular to a
working surface to actuate distinct stepper mechanisms within the
MMCN.
Finally, if the MMCN has enough independently controllable degrees of

freedom, it could step over periodic features on a workpiece surface to
access additional deposition sites. A crystal surface is an attractive
substrate for such an operation, given its rigidity and long-range atomic
precision.
2D and 3D component construction via direct manipulation

technologies. A number of potential atomically precise manufacturing
techniques could lead to productive nanosystems.
Patterned Atomic Layer Epitaxy (see Topic 3 Fabrication and Synthesis

Methods, Subsection 3.4.3) is a mechanosynthesis technique that
achieves top down control by using atomically precise depassivation to
activate bonding sites on a crystalline surface. This approach avoids
directly capturing and placing atoms or molecules, but instead allows
reactive molecules in an ambient gas or liquid to bond to these activated
sites in a direct, conventional fashion. An advantage of this technique is
that it forms a densely bonded structure as a direct consequence of the
epitaxial growth of a covalent crystal lattice.
Another mechanosynthesis approach discussed in this roadmap is
direct manipulation of reactive molecules by capturing and placing
them at specific reactive sites on a workpiece. Bonding
multifunctional monomers is conceptually straightforward, and
quantum chemistry methods have been used to investigate
processes that would transfer highly reactive molecular fragments
(one or several atoms) to build up a densely bonded covalent
structure. An attractive goal would be to extend this analysis to
placement of less exotic reactive monomers to form 3D networks
with mixed ionic/covalent bonding. Examples include silicic acid
and other oxide-crystal growth species. Many of these reactions are
compatible with aqueous conditions suitable for the use of MMCN
components to provide mechanical constraints on reaction
locations.
Another approach to constructing highly interconnected 2D or 3D
structures would be to use larger blocks rich in potential bonding
sites. For example, an MMCN framework might bind a dendrimer
block in a way that imposes geometric constraints that break the
symmetry of its potential bonding sites, enabling them to perform
different and specific roles in a structure. This approach could
enable dendrimers to be used as building blocks in highly cross-
linked structures, resulting in products with more fine-grained
structural control than the symmetries of the dendrimers would
otherwise permit.
As the technologies develop, diverse mechanosynthesis techniques
can be expected to widen the range of useful reagents on both ends
of the scale of reactivity: precise positioning of a highly reactive
reagent at a single chemical site on a workpiece should allow its use
where uncontrolled solution chemistry would yield unwanted side
products from reaction with other, chemically similar sites. Forceful
application of a relatively unreactive reagent on a site on a
workpiece can in some instances address activation energy barriers
to overcome what would otherwise be unacceptably low reaction
rates.
2.5 Systems for Application Areas

The following sections discuss several potential areas of application for
AP nanosystems, some at the product level, some at the subsystem level,
and of clear utility for products. In general, applications have the
potential to expand greatly from early-generation products (sharply
restricted materials, scale, and complexity; high cost) to progressively
more advanced products (with materials expanding well beyond the
familiar range, scale eventually growing to macroscopic, complexity
limited by design capabilities, and costs potentially quite low).

2.5.1 Information Processing Systems
Add-Ons to Advanced Semiconductor Systems. Semiconductor
systems are increasingly limited by the Poisson statistics of implanted
impurity ions that control the electronic properties of the transistors in
the system. APM would provide a number of options to solve this
problem:
• Atomically precise synthesis of electrically conventional
transistors, but with atomically precise positioning of
impurity atoms.
• Atomically precise synthesis of exotic, but proven, active
devices, such as carbon nanotube transistors. A possible
alternative is the use of planar graphene as the
semiconductor.
• Atomically precise synthesis of devices which have gain, but
which are not directly analogous to transistors. An example
is a molecular tunnel diode with negative differential
resistance.
In addition to forming the active devices, integrating them into an

otherwise conventional semiconductor fabrication process would
require forming electrical contacts to conventional electrical
conductors. Considerable work has been done on the interfaces
between molecular electronics and conventional metals, as reported by
Reed and associates (Reed et al., 1997).
Replacing atomically imprecise transistors with atomically precise FETS

throughout a system requires moderately high productivity from APM.
An earlier hybrid application area is in instrumentation, where the bulk
of a system might be built by conventional techniques yet the critical
sensor(s) would be built by atomically precise approaches. Patterned
ALE would provide a very natural match to the substrates of modern,
but atomically imprecise, electronic systems for this type of hybrid
system.
Another type of hybrid of conventional microelectronics and patterned

ALE might take place when the AP component of the system is capable
of useful function (e.g., as STM tips) but is not yet capable of
implementing logic or memory. Given some error rate in the
patterning, it might be necessary to, for example, disable the
nonfunctional STM tips, and the conventional FETS on the substrate
might be used to do that.
Full Computational Systems. Given advanced atomically precise

manufacturing, the devices described above continue to be available,
and the atomic precision can be extended to the conductors in the
design and to their interfaces with the active devices. In addition, the
freedom to explore configurations other than active devices on a silicon
surface allows more options devices, 3D organization, integrated
cooling, etc.
Information-Oriented Optical Systems. For some applications,

advanced APM systems will enable construction of better devices than
we currently have for electronic-to-optical, optical-to-electronic, and
nonlinear optical operations.
In the specific case of nonlinear optical operations, second-harmonic

crystals must have no center of symmetry, but symmetry is difficult to
avoid in conventional materials fabrication. The same molecular level
asymmetry that produces the nonlinear optical feature tends to force
crystallization in cells which oppose molecular dipole moments, and
tend to cancel nonlinear optical effects. Productive nanosystems could
bypass this limitation.
For information processing, the gains likely in the optical domain are
smaller than in some other domains simply because the scale of useful
devices is set by the wavelength of light. The chemical flexibility of APM
promises better materials, and the general manufacturing flexibility of
APM promises easier integration of systems than current
manufacturing allows, but this area presents fewer opportunities for
strikingly new features than some of the other areas considered.
2.5.2 Medical Systems

Medical applications offer a broad scope for near-term, atomically
precise systems. Several of these involve combing antibodies with labels
or bioactive elements. For example, researchers have combined a
magnetic moiety visible on NMR with a radioisotope and a near-IR
fluorescent probe, all linked to antibodies that highlight different types
of diseased tissues. (See Bumb et al., 2007.)
This is a covalently linked system with multiple functional pieces. The

general availability of NMR as a position-sensitive readout mechanism
(with many parallel channels at many separable chemical shifts) and the
ability of in-vivo atomically precise systems to respond to many
clinically interesting chemical parameters with a change in the NMR
signal suggests that this is a rich area for near term applications.
The nanoscale near-term opportunities in the medical area are related

to therapeutics, principally in delivery systems, as described by Dr.
Chiming Wei (see Wei, Paper 29, Working Group Proceedings): “In

drug therapy, nanotechnology can dramatically improve the therapeutic
potential of many water-insoluble and unstable drugs either through
size reduction or encapsulation of the drug particles. In gene therapy,
polymers and lipids can condense DNA into nanoparticles that can be
internalized by cells, followed by delivery of the DNA into the nucleus.”
While these examples are not atomically precise, Dr. Wei also cites
dendrimers as attractive delivery mechanisms, and these are atomically
precise.
A wide variety of diagnostic applications of nanoscale technology are

also cited by Dr. Wei:
• The use of semiconductor nanoparticles, quantum dots, as
fluorophores which are far more resistant to photobleaching
than their organic dyes predecessors. “This increased
photostability is especially useful for three-dimensional (3D)
optical sectioning, where a major issue is bleaching of
fluorophores during acquisition of successive z-sections,
which compromises the correct reconstruction of 3D
structures.”
• The use of scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM)
to image cell ultrastructure with much less perturbation of
the cell than AFM imposes.
• The integration of atomically precise binding sites for a
variety of potential analate molecules with nanowires to
translate the chemical binding event into a change in
electrical conductivity of the nanowire.
• Targeted contrast agents—“Techniques have been developed
recently to achieve molecular and cellular imaging with most
imaging modalities, including nuclear, optical, ultrasound,
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).”
Over the longer term, APM and medical applications are a natural fit.
Living materials are intricately structured on the nanoscale. Many
interactions between our cells involve complex nanoscale actions (e.g.,
the presentation of antigens in [what is the name of the cells involved?]
out immune system). It seems reasonable to expect both diagnostic and
therapeutic activities to involve more and more materials structured on
this scale.
With very advanced APM, the potential exists to construct systems that
are substantially better than the biological subsystems in healthy
humans. For example, there have been theoretical studies of micron
scale AP systems (“respirocytes”) that would perform the same oxygen-

transport task as erythrocytes, but with an oxygen-carrying capability
greater by 2 orders of magnitude.
2.5.3 Energy Conversion Systems

Generally speaking, APM has the largest impact on energy conversion
Opportunity to systems where throughput is directly affected by the nanoscale or
Extend the Bridge atomic scale features of energy conversion components. For example,
theoretical studies of advanced-generation AP electrical motors have
It isn’t clear what the best yielded designs with power densities >1012 W/m3, far above current
long term option is here. capabilities, yet chiefly a consequence of elementary mechanical and
Simply using APM to electromagnetic scaling laws.
manufacture conventional
silicon cells, but with the
Bulk power conversion is not a clear near term target for APM. The
current costs of AP fabrication from both self-assembled and scanning
system-level advantages of
probe approaches are too high to be competitive in bulk energy
fabricating an array of
conversion, though specialized niche applications may still find them
much smaller cells
useful. With plausible cost reductions and performance advantages,
connected by flexible
however, systems incorporating AP self-assembled structures may
conducting joints would prove attractive in this area, and this potential is well worth exploring.
preserve the high efficiency Nonetheless, considerable attention has been given to solar power
of the cells while overcom- applications of nanoscale component technologies, both photovoltaic
ing some of their disad- and photochemical.
vantages. On the other
hand, given a blank slate Photovoltaic. For comparison, note that existing silicon photovoltaic
to choose any organic cells can reach an efficiency of 24% (at 0 C) (University of Oregon,1996).
structure as the cell, one The limitations on the cells include rigidity/fragility, degradation over
might be able to do better time, and the high cost of fabrication. Near term nanoscale technology
than silicon. Whether the
offers options such as organic photovoltaics, with lower costs, better
degradation of the cells, of
flexibility, but with reduced efficiency (~5%).
either type, can be avoided
Photochemical. Near term nanoscale approaches (albeit atomically
is unclear. One option that imprecise) have yielded significant results (11% efficiency). (See Khan et
advanced APM systems al., 2002.)
might provide is to simply
periodically Electrochemical/Fuel Cells/Batteries.
remanufacture the cell in
situ, removing any From a systems perspective, the ability to, for example, integrate
accumulated damage. transportation of solid fuels and fuel cells on a sub-millimeter scale
would permit many products that would be infeasible today. For
instance, it would become feasible to feed a solid graphite crystal into a
fuel cell, with atomically precise coordination between the fuel feed and
the electrode reactions. In the shorter term, the molecular-scale nature
of the key physical processes in batteries and fuel cells has already
attracted extensive research in nanostructured materials. AP
nanostructures hold great promise in this area.

Bumb, A; Brechbiel, M. W.; Choyke, P.; Fugger, L.; and Dobson, P. J.
2007. “Nanomedicine: Engineering of a Tri-Imageable Nanoparticle,”
Presentation at NSTI Nanotech 2007, May 20-24, 2007, Santa Clara,
CA. Abstract available on line at http://www.nsti.org/Nanotech2007/-
showabstract.html?absno=835.
Khan, Shahed U. M.; Al-Shahry, Mofareh; and Ingler, William B. Jr.

2002. “Efficient Photochemical Water Splitting by a Chemically
Modified n-TiO2,” Science 27 September 2002:Vol. 297. no. 5590, pp.
2243 – 2245.
Reed, M. A.; Zhou, C..; Muller, C. J.; Burgin, T. P.; and Tour, J. M. 1997.
“Conductance of a Molecular Junction,” Science, 10 October 1997: Vol.
278. no. 5336, pp. 252 – 254
University of Oregon. 1996. Solar Energy: Conversion into Electricity.

Teaching aid available on line at http://zebu.uoregon.edu/-
1996/ph162/l6a.html

Topic 3 Fabrication and Synthesis Methods
3.1 Introduction
This topic presents techniques for fabricating atomically precise
components, as well as a brief survey and assessment of coarser-
resolution technologies (e.g., nanolithographic methods) that can
facilitate the development or application of atomically precise systems,
including productive nanosystems and their products.
The products of these fabrication and synthesis methods are often

tenable building blocks and components for larger-scale assemblies,
aspects that are the focus of Topic 1, Components and Devices.
The process of design can be thought of as the sequence of exploring

and choosing from the array of designs possible within a fabrication
technique, building the target, testing it against the criteria for the
application, refining the design choices, and repeating.
Ideally, an atomically precise fabrication method would provide:

• Reliable control of the 3D location of each atom in the design
• Many possible design choices
− Many types of subunits
− The ability to freely choose between subunits at many
locations
− The ability to build large structures, with many total
design options
• Rapid turnaround times for designs
• Ability to build many instances of a design.
Table 3-1 provides a sampling of some atomically precise fabrication

techniques available today.
By combining several of these methods it has proved possible to build

operational molecular machines (though in some, components are not
atomically precise). This approach is explored in Subsection 3.5 Hybrid
Fabrication.

Table 3-1. Characteristics of Atomically Precise Fabrication Techniques Available Today.
Self Assembly Organic Synthesis
Metal/Ligand Bis-peptide
Parameter DNA Protein Supramolecular STM/Vacuum oligomers Total Synthesis
3D control Excellent Excellent ? Mostly 2D Good Varies
Types of units 4 20 Large Few in any >14 Very large

single system
Programmable 100% 100% ? Some 100% Constrained
locations, 3 bits/kD 30 constraint, 24 bits/kD by side
Density of bits/kD Reconstruction reactions
choices 20 bits/kD 200 bits/kD
Maximum size 3x106 104 ? 103 atoms 103 ~102 atoms
atoms atoms (single (non-polymer)
oligomer)
Turnaround Days Months ? Hours to Days Days Days to Years
time
Instances 1017 1020 1023 1 1020 1023
3.2 Organic Synthesis

Developments in organic chemistry, which include millions of distinct
synthetic structures over a period of two centuries, cannot be readily
summarized in the space of a few paragraphs. Roughly speaking, if a
structure of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and halogen atoms is
physically stable and not too large, an organic chemist can probably
synthesize it. Why then, are other, more specialized, design motifs such
as DNA and proteins being considered? Because it generally takes a
great deal of time and effort to synthesize an arbitrarily selected organic
structure. The time needed to invent and debug a synthesis for an
arbitrary (in general, polycyclic) organic structure possessing on the
order of 100 atoms is on the order of months to years.
For the design of large atomically precise systems, it is best to think of

classical organic chemistry as a source of a vast but finite set of
functional components and building blocks on the order of 10 to 100
atoms in size. Two major exceptions to this restriction are
• The formation of chemical libraries: Some reactions (e.g.,
peptide bond formation, esterification) are so reliable, even
in the presence of a wide variety of other chemically active
groups, that given N starting materials with one functionality
and M starting materials with the complementary
functionality, one can be essentially assured that all NxM
products of the reactions are immediately accessible.
• The formation of linear sequences of selected monomers via
solid phase synthesis. This is another way of describing both
peptides and unnatural foldamers. This gives a vast range of
possible products, NM for N types of monomers and the
ability to link M of them in sequence. The disadvantage is
that the 1D sequence is chosen, but the 3D structure is
difficult to predict and may not be a unique, stable structure
at all.
3.3 Atomically Precise Self-Assembly

Although scientific studies can benefit from a focus on small, simple
structures (which better reveal differences in elementary binding
interactions), where atomically precise self-assembly (APSA) is
concerned, design principles favor larger structures (which better
conceal errors in estimating elementary binding interactions). Larger
structures with larger interfaces enable a designer to control more
features, offering more opportunities for strengthening or disrupting
selected binding interactions. Larger interfaces also increase the
For larger DNA strands
tolerance for modeling errors: when adding multiple interactions, each
expected to be stabilizing, cumulative errors in the total binding energy and proteins, genetic
grow as the square root of area, while the expected binding energy engineering methods can
increases linearly. This reduces sensitivity to modeling errors and be used. The problem of
enables more reliable design of strong binding. fabricating atomically
precise 3D structures with
Constructing a system via APSA requires two steps: these biopolymers largely
reduces to the design
1. Covalent synthesis of either components or of the primary problem of choosing the
structure of the system.
right monomer sequence to
2. Assembly or folding of the system via non-covalent interactions. self-assemble into the
desired 3D structure.
For two major systems, DNA and peptides, the covalent assembly step is
routine and automated. For larger DNA strands and proteins, genetic
engineering methods can be used. The problem of fabricating
atomically precise 3D structures with these biopolymers largely reduces
to the design problem of choosing the right monomer sequence to self-
assemble into the desired 3D structure.

Figure 3-1. Examples of Self-Assembly. Left, DNA triangle motif structures self-assemble into hexagonal
arrays. Courtesy of Nadrian Seeman. Right, Shape programmable bis-peptide molecules
made from self-assembling subunits. Courtesy of Christian Schafmeister.
3.3.1 DNA Atomically Precise Self-Assembly

Self-assembly of DNA into non-linear structures (cages, decorated
sheets) has enabled the design and fabrication of the most complex
atomically precise structures yet made. DNA is unique in that its
secondary structure is dependent on its primary structure, the order of
the nucleotide bases, in a very well understood way. DNA provides
precise and well-understood molecular recognition properties because
the nucleotide base A specifically pairs with the base T and the
nucleotide base G specifically pairs with C—termed Watson-Crick base
pairing. Thus, a DNA double helix forms from the hybridization of two
strands of complementary nucleotide bases. DNA base-pairing allows
for a large number of specific interactions to be scripted—4N possible
sequences for a DNA strand N deoxynucleotides long. Even using short
olignucleotides a large number of specific interactions can be
programmed. The simplest use of this library of precise pairings is as
‘smart glue’ to assemble networks of defined structure. In this way
materials and devices with unique and useful properties have been
created. Additional benefits of building with DNA include (i) the
existence of a well-developed infrastructure of reagents and
technologies provided by the biotechnology industry—especially the
automated synthesis of single-strand DNA oligonucleotides of more
than 100 nucleotides, (ii) the fact that the base sequence of a DNA can
be read even when the double helix is intact by 'reading' the grooves
along the outside of the helix, enabling in theory the determination of
absolute position along the DNA helix, and (iii) a variety of synthetic
molecules are available as alternative bases and alternative backbone
structures that may be chemically more useful for certain functions.
Although the base pairing between the two complementary strands of

DNA can be used to assemble molecules or nanoparticles into clusters
of known composition that have useful properties and functions,
further modification is needed to build nanostructures with predictable
geometry. The key innovation that enabled structural DNA nano-
technology was the design and implementation of stable branched
structures of DNA that could be combined to form larger covalent and
non-covalent structures, of diverse three dimensional geometry and
with nanomechanical functionality, using base-pairing between
overhanging single strand ends of DNA (or sticky ends, overhangs of
several unpaired nucleotides at an end of a helix).
The capacity to construct three-dimensional addressable molecular

networks began with the demonstration that small DNA tiles (for The key innovation that
example, 2 x 4 x 16 nm) can be constructed from branched DNA enabled structural DNA
molecules that are rigid enough to form crystalline arrays several nanotechnology was the
microns in extent (Winfree et al., 1998). These tiles were built from design and implementa-
double-crossover (DX) molecules of DNA, in which two 4-arm
tion of stable branched
branched junctions are joined at two adjacent double helical arms. The
structures of DNA that
result is two side-by-side double-stranded helices linked by two
could be combined to form
crossovers. Further, sticky ends on the corners of the tiles provide
larger covalent and non-
intermolecular interactions that can be programmed to specify how
several tiles with different structures will assemble, thus forming covalent structures
periodic nanometer-scale patterns in micron-scale arrays. In addition, it
is possible to incorporate into a tile a third junction that forms a DNA
hairpin roughly perpendicular to the plane of the other two helices. This
extra structural domain provides a topographic marker that can be
detected by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and so easily mark tiles in
an array that have the extra domain. A useful tile can also be made from
DNA triple-crossover (TX) motifs, which contain three coplanar double
helices linked at each of four crossover points (that is, with each
neighboring pair of helices linked by two crossovers), fitted with sticky
ends at the corners to program assembly into two-dimensional arrays
(LaBean et al., 2000).
In addition to the planar tiles formed from DX and TX motifs, it is

possible to build DNA nanotubes from motifs designed to not be planar.
By properly designing the crossovers between helical domains, a six-
helix bundle can be formed from six DNA double helices that are
connected to each other at two crossover sites (Mathieu et al., 2005).
The six helices form a DNA nanotube with a hexagonal cross-section
and a central hole about the diameter of the DNA double helix—2.0 nm.

If these motifs are designed so that overhangs on the two ends of each
helix are complementary to each other, then the six-helix bundles self-
assemble to form one-dimensional arrays—rather stiff wires more than
7 μm long, Such stiff nanostructures might be useful as nanomechanical
struts. For productive nanosystems development, the surfaces of six-
helix bundles could be used to mount other motifs and nanodevices that
could be oriented in specified directions. Theoretical analysis of
minimally strained nucleic acid nanotubes reveals that a wide variety of
DNA-based nanotubes can serve as tubes with specific inner and outer
radii and with multiple lobes (Sherman and Seeman, 2006). Such tubes
could be useful as both scaffolding and custom-shaped enclosures for
other nanostructures.
Two-dimensional ‘nanogrids’ have been shown to template the

formation of periodic protein arrays (Yan et al., 2003). The large cavity
size and the bulge loops, which can be chemically functionalized, at the
center of each 4 x 4 tile provide each square with a potential site for
Because it is possible to conjugating a molecule so that the lattice could direct the periodic
develop DNAzymes with assembly of desired molecules. This capability was demonstrated by
diverse catalytic activities, incorporating biotin to one loop on each tile and to produce a periodic
and because it is possible array of streptavidin molecules—a protein widely used in molecular
to arrange DNA tiles in biology because of its extremely strong binding to the vitamin biotin,
complex patterns, both one of the strongest non-covalent interactions known.
periodic and aperiodic, it
seems likely that much Proteins are not the only potentially useful molecular machines that
more complex patterns of
have been organized in two-dimensional arrays constructed from DNA
(Garibotti et al., 2006). Through a combination of in vitro selection and
catalytic functions can be
trial and error, a DNA enzyme was developed—a bi-molecular complex
developed.
in which a 29-nucleotide catalytic strand will, in the presence of Cu2+,
cleave a specific position in a 22-nucleotide substrate strand. This self-
cleaving DNAzyme was incorporated into a two-dimensional array
formed from four DX-tiles. Because it is possible to develop DNAzymes
with diverse catalytic activities, and because it is possible to arrange
DNA tiles in complex patterns, both periodic and aperiodic, it seems
likely that much more complex patterns of catalytic functions can be
developed. Two-dimensional arrays of DNA tiles can also be used to
organize patterns of more than one component, including the
patterning of gold nanoparticles (Pinto et al., 2005).
Rigid nanostructures make possible nanomechanical devices because a

rigid object can respond to an external signal by moving in a predictable
fashion, and this behavior can be observed reliably in an ensemble of
molecules. Multiple crossover motifs were first used to demonstrate a
DNA nanomechanical device based on the transition of the normal,
right-handed B form of the DNA helix to the left-handed helix of Z-

DNA (Keren et al., 2002). Subsequent nanomechanical devices have
demonstrated rotary motion and biped walking.
Structural DNA nanotechnology provides the ability to construct

molecularly precise structures based upon the well-understood
molecular recognition properties of DNA. Numerous molecularly
precise DNA nanostructures have been demonstrated. Micron-scale
and larger two-dimensional periodic arrays of DNA nanostructures
have been built. At the scale of 100 to several hundred nanometers,
DNA nanostructures can be arranged in an arbitrary aperiodic pattern
in two dimensions, and there is reasonable optimism that this ability
can soon be extended to three dimensions. Molecular biology and the
biotechnology industry provide a well developed infrastructure for the
technology: a wide range of DNA molecules, reagents, and methods
useful for creating and characterizing DNA nanostructures. The most
recently developed and perhaps the most promising approach to
structural DNA nanotechnology—scaffolded DNA origami—enables
quick and inexpensive implementation with ~5 nm resolution and lends
itself to automated design and manufacture.
DNA Structures.
• Are now straightforward to design to a target atomically
precise 3D structure
• Provide more than an order of magnitude more design
choice than other available alternatives
• Produce atomically precise structures two orders of
magnitude more massive than other alternatives.
DNA Limitations.
• DNA provides excellent topological control, and has
substantial bending stiffness, but the flexibility of the DNA
molecule is substantial and the grid size is set by base pair
spacing (~0.3 nm) and the helix diameter (~2 nm), which for
many applications is relatively coarse.
• DNA is not, in itself, a chemically versatile material. It is built
from four nucleotides, all with similar sizes and chemical
properties. In order to provide highly functional atomically
precise structures, it must be linked to more highly
functional components.
• Chemical synthesis is currently limited to a modest number
of base pairs (<150), and biologically produced DNA strands
must be used in conjunction with shorter designed strands to
create larger structures. The number of base pairs that can be
chemically synthesized towards a target application is
currently dependent on the project’s tolerance for limited
yields and for impurities, rather than only being dependent
on the underlying chemistry.
• DNA is a single material with a particular set of properties.
Many desirable products will require a variety of material
properties that DNA does not provide and will be difficult to
achieve with DNA as the primary “glue” or framework of the
product.
The first and second of these items can be addressed by linking DNA to
functional components.
Atomically precise self-assembly requires atomic-level complementarity

between surfaces. However, many potentially useful components
(magic-size quantum dots, nanotube segments, crystal-surface
features...) have fixed surface structures that cannot be expected to fit
other surfaces of interest. This highlights the need for linking structures
of kinds that enable design of surfaces with a wide range of shapes and
A research target
properties. Biopolymers, and proteins in particular, can serve this role
would be to build up
in many instances. Many DNA binding proteins are known, and zinc
either a library of such
fingers, in particular, can be designed to recognize and bind to specific
proteins or an efficient
sites without breaking the inter-base pairing.
process for designing
them – or at least for In particular, the binding domains of restriction enzymes can link on
efficiently varying the the DNA side to paired DNA strands. The targets of these enzymes are
relative positioning of DNA sequences 4 to 12 base pairs long. Examples binding to hundreds
the functional of different sequences are known.
component and the
DNA sequence. A protein designed to bind to a DNA sequence on one side and to a
functional component on the other can also be used to adjust the
positioning of the functional component. Here, the higher density of
design points within the protein and the greater irregularity of protein
secondary structure are a help, allowing adjustment of the positioning
of the functional component on a finer grid than that of DNA base pair
spacing.
A research target would be to build up either a library of such proteins

or an efficient process for designing them – or at least for efficiently
varying the relative positioning of the functional component and the
DNA sequence.
A related option, for DNA structures containing relatively short

sequences from solid phase synthesis is to insert covalent bonds to at
least some functional units. This technique has been routinely used to
link nanoscale particles to DNA, and then to use the DNA to join
particles with complementary DNA strands.

Options for increasing structural stiffness include
• Adding extra DNA strands
• Applying links to functional components to pieces which are
themselves stiff, notably SWCNTs – but there are
complications to avoid links to random parts of the SWCNT.
For example, if one wants to use two sections of nanotube to
reinforce a structure, one needs to add two linkers, then one
tube, then add two linkers, then add a second nanotube. If all
four linkers were active at the same time, then the identical-
looking sections of the two nanotubes might get linked to the
wrong places.
• Using the DNA structure as a template for stiffer materials.
Metals have been deposited on DNA strands to form
nanowires, e.g., DNA nanowire fabrication (Gu et al., 2006).
3.3.2 Protein Atomically Precise Self-Assembly

Proteins, like nucleic acids, have a primary structure that is built of
covalent bonds that link monomer, amino acid subunits together. As
with DNA, building the primary structure is routine. Proteins are
comprised typically of 20 amino acids. They can have predictable, three-
dimensional arrangements of atoms due to their well-defined secondary
and tertiary structure, making them well-suited for atomically precise
manufacturing. Proteins are also inherently highly functional due to the
wide range of amino acid side chains. This combination of structural
and side chain variability is responsible for the wide range of functions
that proteins carry out in living organisms, ranging from catalysis, to
mechanical motion, to structural components of cells and tissue. Hence,
proteins are natural candidates as both building blocks and active
working components of productive nanosystems.
New advances in biotechnology offer exciting prospects for custom-

made proteins. Biological processes can be harnessed to construct novel
structures and to tailor binding properties to other materials. For
example, combinatorial libraries of short peptide sequences can be used
to identify peptides with desired specificity. This is typically accom-
plished by manipulating an organism’s DNA sequence (e.g., virus,
bacteria, or yeast) to produce random peptides on the exterior of the
organism. This process can be automated to create libraries containing
up to a billion different peptide sequences. Through repeated exposure
and selection of the biologically based library, peptides with desired
affinities to chosen structures can be identified.
As researchers strive to develop new protein sequences for

nanomanufacturing by employing methods such as combinatorial
selection, others are working with modified versions of existing
proteins, protein fragments and de novo designed sequences. Computer
aided, de novo design offers a useful approach to identifying tailored
protein structures. The process of de novo design starts with a general
structural description and then designs a sequence that will fold to
produce that result. Researchers using this technique have managed to
improve upon natural protein-protein interactions and to design
proteins for improved biosensors.
Extending the capabilities of protein engineering is a strategic objective

due to the range of functions that proteins serve, and the utility of
proteins as an atomically precise “glue.” The specific binding properties
can be used to create self-assembled functional nanosystems that
incorporate a wide range of non-protein components. These capabilities
have applications to areas including (early on) catalysis for
pharmaceutical production, and (with more advanced capabilities) self-
assembled “circuit boards” for molecular electronics. The ability of
many proteins to aggregate or self-assemble into precise, longer-range
structures is extremely useful for preparing larger scale structures. Viral
coat proteins and bacterial surface layer proteins are well known
examples of self assembling, two-dimensional protein lattices. Genetic
engineering of such proteins enables the precise placement and
integration of these lattices with other structures.
The self-assembly and organizational properties of proteins stem from

the specific binding properties that proteins can possess. Fusions of
different peptide sequence enable multiple binding capabilities in a
single polypeptide sequence. Additionally, peptide sequences can be
identified that specifically bind inorganic materials, including metals,
semiconductors and various nanomaterials, allowing for the directed
assembly of structures other than proteins.
Proteins can have significantly different mechanical properties and can

be designed for intended applications. Examples include spider silk,
which can be strong and elastic, and collagen, a fibrous protein used for
supporting biological structures. Further stiffness and structural
support can be accomplished through mineralization of inorganic
materials, as observed in marine shells, teeth, and bone. Self-assembled
protein structures are observed to template and catalyze the formation
of inorganic structures. Silicatein, a protein found in marine sponges,
templates silica deposition and catalyzes bond formation. Silaffin
peptides are thought to serve a similar function in diatoms. Synthetic
peptide constructs have been shown to crystallize hydroxyapatite. In
addition to control over nanometer and greater length scales,
biomineralized structures can be crystalline, such as hydroxyapatite or
calcium carbonate, and atomically precise. Biomineralization

approaches offer the possibility to stiffen protein subsystems by growing
semiconductor lattice backbones around them, to link atomically
precise protein components of nanostructures to functional
semiconductor nanocrystals, or to link atomically precise protein
components of nanostructures to extended (possibly lithographed)
semiconductor crystal surfaces.
Protein engineering is a maturing technology for designing and

fabricating complex, atomically precise objects several nanometers in An important goal of
size. The ability to specifically engineer proteins to bind in a defined biotechnology is to develop
way to other molecules, to build larger structures, and to bind biological protein engineering
and non-biological functional molecules presents a rich toolbox for the methods to create new
creation of productive nanosystems. From this perspective, an proteins or modifications
important goal of biotechnology is to develop protein engineering of existing proteins for
methods to create new proteins or modifications of existing proteins for integration into hybrid
integration into hybrid nanodevices. nanodevices.
3.3.3 Alternative Shape Programmable Oligomers

Protein design is advancing; nonetheless, considerable effort is still
necessary to choose a sequence of amino acids which will fold into a
desired 3D structure. An alternative approach to this problem is to use a
less flexible polymer system which requires less work to deduce its 3D
structure once the 1D sequence of monomers is chosen.
The work of Christian Schafmeister at Temple University demonstrates

the use of chemical synthesis in an algorithmic fashion to produce
specific structures with well controlled 3D shapes. It uses a set of
modular building blocks called bis-amino acids that can be strung
together in a linear chain where two covalent bonds connect each
modular building block to the next. The linear chains that are formed
are rigid ladder-like molecules called bis-peptides. Using building
blocks of different sizes, with spatial (angular and distance) relation-
ships between the two sets of binding sites, allows the creation of large
molecules that have a rigid structure that can be predicted very rapidly.
Schafmeister has developed a computer aided design tool that can select
a synthesis sequence that will best fit a particular design structure. The
synthesis of bis-peptides is carried out on commercially available
automated peptide synthesizers. Schafmeister’s group is developing
building blocks that carry an additional functional group like natural
amino acids do. These functionalized bis-amino acids will be incor-
porated into bis-peptides to create catalysts that function the way that
enzymes do and to carry out complex, atomically precise self-assembly.
Bis-peptides could be used in nanotechnology in several ways. In a first

generation nanotechnology they could serve many of the functions

envisioned for proteins and serve as larger building blocks and adaptors
within complex nanoscale devices and machines. They could also be
used to create catalysts that could assemble large, complex nano-
machines from small molecules. A proposal for how bis-peptides could
be used to create a second-generation nanotechnology wherein bis-
peptides act as catalysts to assemble new bis-peptides under external
computer control is presented in a Paper in Part 3 of the
Nanotechnology Roadmap, Working Group Proceedings. The central
idea is to mimic the cytoplasm of a cell using complex bis-peptide
enzymes. The proposal outlines a system of bis-peptides that are
controlled externally using an electronic reduction/oxidation based
computer interface that would allow the rapid construction and testing
of new bis-peptide based nanostructures to develop even more
sophisticated nanotechnology.
More generally, a large range of foldamers systems have been examined

over the years (beta-peptides, peptide nucleic acids). Roughly speaking,
proteins have the advantage that
• They can be produced by genetic engineering methods
• They are more mature technologies
− Their folding process has been intensively investigated
for decades, including extensive work on modeling and
design algorithms.
− There are large databases of known tertiary structures.
Several unnatural foldamers have been developed that adopt well
defined secondary structures with sequences consisting of very few
monomers. The development of unnatural foldamers that can adopt
well defined folded tertiary structures is yet to be developed.
Bis-peptides, by contrast, do not require folding to attain their

structures and bis-peptide structures by virtue of their ladder-like
covalent structure are much more robust than those of proteins.
A key requirement for stable and specific APSA using designed DNA,
protein or other oligomeric molecules is that matching surfaces must be
large enough to display multiple molecular features with distinct
properties (of shape, charge, polarity, hydrogen bonding, etc.). These
features enable the design of complementary surfaces that exhibit
strong cooperative binding, while disrupting binding among other, non-
complementary surfaces. This constrains the designed molecules to
have a minimum size, on the order of a few nanometers along two or
three of their dimensions. This means that the molecules must be at
least 5 kD to 10 kD. In addition the molecules must be complex,
information rich and asymmetric. Satisfying these criteria

simultaneously is difficult with organic synthesis and can only be
achieved economically using solid phase oligomer synthesis or
production methods that exploit the productive nanosystems found in
bacteria.
The chemical variety of oligomers built with solid phase synthesis

(including peptides) can exceed that achievable using only the 20
standard amino acids found in nature. An intermediate case is the
addition of unnatural amino acids to the natural set, achieved by
reprogramming unused codons.
3.3.4 Chemical Atomically Precise Self-Assembly

Most self-assembly processes discussed in the literature today are not
atomically precise. The term is used to refer to the spontaneous
aggregation of molecules (or particles) to form partially ordered films,
fibers, and clusters. Self-assembly can be used to create sheets, ribbons,
helixes and complex three-dimensional architectures, based on the
nature and orientation of the contributing intermolecular forces. These
structures are occasionally atomically precise, but often are not.
Partially ordered systems are discussed in a later section. Examples of Scanning probe micro-
atomically precise self-assembly (APSA) of small chemical entities often scopes offer a basis for
exploit attractive intermolecular interactions like those found in self- APM of several kinds,
assembled biological systems. These include van der Waals and some of which are
Coulombic attraction, dipole-dipole interactions, hydrogen bonding, accessible to current
acid-base interactions, and binding of metal atoms. Metal-ligand self laboratory techniques.
assembly, often involving non-biological motifs, has been extensively
studied and sometimes used to organize structures of substantial size.
3.4 Scanning-Probe-Based Fabrication

Scanning probe microscopes can image individual atoms and molecules,
manipulate them, and effect chemical reactions between them to form
atomically precise structures. They offer a basis for APM of several
kinds, some of which are accessible to current laboratory techniques.
3.4.1 Background
Starting with the Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) in 1982
(Binnig and Rohrer, 1982) and the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) in
1986 (Binning et al., 1986), scanning probe microscopy has proven
capable of atomically precise manipulation for approximately two
decades. This generally involves direct manipulation techniques that
move atoms or molecules on surfaces. These operations use mechanical
positioning to direct the making and breaking of strong bonds, and thus

provide examples of mechanosynthesis (as to ribosomes in biology, but
by very different means).
Direct manipulation of an atom was demonstrated in 1987 (Becker et

al., 1987), using voltage pulses on an STM tip to pluck a single
germanium atom from the Ge(111) surface of a sample. The first
experimental demonstration that individual atoms could be
manipulated into patterns was performed by IBM scientists in 1989
when they used an STM to precisely position weakly bound 35 xenon
atoms on a nickel surface to spell out the corporate logo “IBM” (Eigler
and Schweizer, 1990). Also using STMs, the Aono Group (working from
1989-1994) removed individual silicon atoms from a crystal surface and
deposited them in different locations, and deposited hydrogen atoms.
Atom removals were mediated by electric field rather than current. The
group also demonstrated the ability to detect atom
extraction/deposition in real time.
Figure 3-2. Example of Scanning Probe Fabrication. An atomically precise

nanopore is one possible product made by Patterned Atomic
Layer Epitaxy process. Courtesy Zyvex Corp.
In 1999, an STM was used to pick-and-place individual carbon

monoxide (CO) molecules via electron tunneling (Ho and Lee, 1999).
Individual iron (Fe) atoms were evaporated and coadsorbed with CO
molecules on a silver (110) surface, after which a CO molecule was
transferred from the surface to the STM tip and bonded with an Fe
atom to form Fe(CO), then a second CO molecule was similarly
transferred and bonded with Fe(CO) to form Fe(CO)2 at the same
surface site. In 2000, all steps of a chemical reaction induced on a
copper surface via STM (Hla et al., 2000), including the separation of
iodine from iodobenzene by using tunneling electrons, bringing
together two resultant phenyls mechanically by lateral manipulation
and, finally, their chemical association to form a biphenyl molecule
mediated by excitation with tunneling electrons. In 2003, a near-contact
AFM (Oyabu et al., 2003) was used for the vertical removal of a selected
silicon atom, and subsequently for depositing an Si atom into a selected
Si atom vacancy on the Si(111)-7x7 surface using only mechanical
forces.
3.4.2 Summary of Current Approaches

In order to construct three-dimensional atomically precise structures, a
top-down nanopositioning system would have to direct bond making
and bond breaking processes with atomic precision. The range of
approaches that has been considered includes placement of reactive
molecules of various kinds in various environments.
In solution-phase mechanosynthesis, these include placement and

transfer of conventional monomers or of species involved in solution-
phase crystal growth of oxides and semiconductors. Analogous
mechanosynthetic placement and transfer operations taking place in
inert or ultra-high vacuum environments could employ highly reactive
chemical species. The latter approach would offer perhaps the widest
scope, but would present the greatest difficulty, and is widely viewed as
a long-term objective at best.
Alternatively, synthesis can be directed by selective deprotection, using

this to create reactive sites which then react with and bind molecules
(or molecular fragments) from an ambient gas or liquid. This approach
to mechanosynthesis has the advantage that it avoids the need for
binding and transporting reactive molecules, because the
deprotection/reaction sequence requires no molecular placement and
transfer operation. This deprotection-based approach is a
comparatively recent innovation, and has drawn substantial commercial
investment.
3.4.3 Selective Deprotection and Patterned Atomic Layer

Epitaxy (PALE)
This concept employs scanning probe technology for positional control
to depassivate specific atomic sites on a surface, in combination with
atomic layer epitaxy (ALE) to add a single atomic layer of a second
material from the vapor phase at the depassivated sites. Repeating this
process can allow atomically precise three-dimensional structures to be
built up one atomic layer at a time. This process is referred to as
Patterned ALE or PALE.
PALE Challenges and Successes. This process has been developed by
Lyding’s group at the Beckman Institute. Silicon nanostructures
(Lyding, 2004) and copper phthalocyanine (Cu(Pc)) and norbornadiene
(Hersam et al., 1999a) were successfully grown by selectively
depassivating a hydrogen-terminated silicon surface at atomically
precise locations using Feedback Controlled Lithography, then
depositing the atoms or molecules by adsorption onto the sites from the
gas phase.
The selective deprotection processes have some significant advantages:

• The tool does not need to acquire or bind the atomic or
molecular building block.
• The tool does not need to capture the atom or molecule that
is the passivating species.
• The deprotection process is serial, but the delivery of
building blocks either in the gas or liquid phase may proceed
in parallel.
• The deprotection process, involving breaking a single
chemical bond to free a passivating species, is a more general
process than direct placement of building blocks and may be
more easily adapted to a variety of material systems.
• Tools using deprotection by transfer of electron energy can
avoid all physical contact.
• Electron tunneling and/or field emission tooltips have simple
structures.
The work by Lyding and Hersam(Hersam et al., 1999b) demonstrates

that atomic precision deprotection is possible with an STM tip that is
not atomically precise, but is simply capable of atomic resolution
imaging. However, reliable manufacturing will require a reproducible
tooltip. Fortunately several technologies have emerged recently that can
yield stable, reproducible atomically precise structures at the apex of a
very sharp metal probe (PC-01, 2007).
PALE Objectives and Milestones.
Phase 1: Single STM Si Patterned ALE – Low Throughput
Phase 1 of Patterned ALE will be a single crystalline material process (Si

is a leading candidate) that will be patterned with a single Scanning
Tunneling Microscope (STM). The ALE process is likely to have a
moderately long cycle time. The process will have a very low
throughput but will be able to create products of value that take
advantage of the atomic precision of the structures that are created.
Phase 2: Pattern Once Turn ALE crank – Dual Material ALE (Si/Ge)
Phase 2 will significantly improve the throughput of patterned ALE by

removing the requirement of depassivating every bond where an atom
or molecule is to be added. This can be accomplished by at least two
different methods.
The first involves using two different passivating species, where one
may be selectively removed without disturbing the other. For instance,
both Cl and H will successfully passivate Si (100) surfaces. H will desorb
from the Si surface at lower temperatures than Cl. By using the
patterned Cl layer to first passivate a Si surface, ALE may be used to
grow Si in that patterned area. If the ALE process is one that uses
hydrogen as the passivating chemistry, then the ALE process may be
continued without additional patterning by using temperature as the
depassivating process for the H passivated Si. Because the Cl will remain
in place, then the ALE process will only grow Si in the area that was
originally patterned in the Cl passivation layer. The process may be
continued for as many deposition cycles as desired for that pattern.
Control of the growth on the sidewalls of the ALE grown structure may
be an issue.
A Dual Material ALE process could also have a reduced patterning

requirement as well as a number of other advantages. Consider an
atomically flat section of Ge (100) that was passivated with some species
that can be patterned. An ALE process is used to deposit a monolayer of
Si in the patterned layer. (Heteroepitaxy of Si on Ge and Ge on Si has
been established with ALE processes.) At this point a dual material ALE
process could be used to selectively deposit Si on Si and Ge on Ge
where the cyclic process would alternatively deposit a monolayer of Si
and a monolayer of Ge. In this way the growth surface would stay
atomically flat and there would be no sidewalls to contend with. After a
designed number of deposited monolayers, the pattern could be
changed and complex 3D hetero structures could be created. Since
there are very selective etches to remove Ge, the Ge material could be
used as a sacrificial layer, allowing for releasable structures.
Phase 3: Parallel STM (Modest Parallelization)– Si/Ge, C, Dopants, ALE

(Metal, Insulator, ALD)
Phase 3 of patterned ALE would include a modest number of STM type

tips operating in parallel to do the atomically precise patterning. In this
context, a modest level of parallelization would be on the order of 1000
or less. A dual material ALE process such as Si/Ge would be available to
create releasable complex 3D structures. Other materials such as
diamond, one or more metals, and one or more dielectrics might be

available with patterned ALE or ALD if epitaxial registration could not
be maintained, although there are as yet no known processes for
diamond ALE. The ability to add impurity atoms (dopants) to modify
the properties of the ALE deposited materials could also be exploited.
Phase 4: Moderate Parallel STM— Nanoimprint Replication
In Phase 4 of patterned ALE there would be moderate parallelism with

an array of STM tips to do the atomic precision patterning. In this
context moderate parallelism would mean greater than 1000 tips – up
to about 1,000,000 tips. The ability to replicate atomically precise
templates created by these arrays would be developed via some form of
nanoimprint technology.
Phase 5: Template Based Patterning—Epitaxial Metals and Insulators
Phase 5 patterned ALE would use templates to passivate or depassivate

surfaces to dramatically speed the patterning process. The atomically
precise templates will be created by patterned ALE using the arrays of
STM tips available in Phase 4. Phase 5 would also have developed metal
and insulator deposition that was epitaxial with the other materials
being deposited. Maintaining a continuous crystalline structure would
have benefits for a number of applications.
Phase 6: Functional Nanosystem—Atomically Precise Nanoscale Pico

Positioner Assembled from Atomically Precise Parts
Atomically precise parts made with patterned ALE can be used to

assemble more complex and useful mechanisms, assuming that the
atomically precise parts produced with patterned ALE will be
sophisticated with respect to range of materials that can be integrated
and freedom to design arbitrary 3D structures. The assembly could be
handled in early stages by macroscale positioners. However, the
mechanisms produced by this process could be designed to assemble
these atomically precise parts into larger and more sophisticated
systems.
Phase 7: Productive Nanosystems Based on Programmable Nanoscale

Pico Positioner
Phase 7 is a productive nanosystem that is based on complex

nanoscaled machinery built from Phase 6 capabilities. One of the most
useful of these productive nanosystems is a programmable instrument
that can do patterned ALE or some other form of atomically precise
manufacturing. If it is programmable, it can be used to build parts for
other programmable nanoscaled machines that can produce more
programmable nanoscaled manufacturing machines. Through
exponential assembly, a very large number of these productive
nanosystems could be produced. Once a significant quantity of these are
produced, they can be programmed to produce other atomically precise
articles of value.
3.4.4 Placement-Based Scanning Probe Mechanosynthesis

Mechanosynthesis by means of placement and transfer of reactive
molecules or molecular fragments embraces a wide range of approaches
with varying levels of capability and difficulty.
Perhaps the most accessible approaches would use binding sites at the
active tip to capture reactive species from solution, eliminating the need
for motions or transport systems to acquire them. This approach could
be applied to a range of structures of kinds compatible with synthesis in
a solution-phase environment. These include highly cross-linked
polymers, oxide ceramics (ZnO, TiO2), some semiconductors (CdSe, The combination of mild
CdS) and metals (Cu, Ni), and, perhaps surprisingly, graphite. Many of conditions and processing
these materials have attractive properties, such as fine-grained simplicity of these
regularity, high rigidity, and excellent chemical and thermal stability. approaches suggests their
Many are compatible with synthesis in an aqueous environment, utility as targets for
facilitating the exploitation of atomically precise tools derived from scanning-probe-based, tip-
biopolymers. directed mechanosynthesis,
as well as their suitability
The combination of mild conditions and processing simplicity of these
for early-generation
approaches suggests their utility as targets for scanning-probe-based,
implementations of
tip-directed mechanosynthesis. It likewise suggests their suitability for
early-generation implementations of productive nanosystems that productive nanosystems
employ tip-directed mechanosynthesis. that employ tip-directed
mechanosynthesis.
This range of approaches has received too little attention relative to
some of the earlier concepts for mechanosynthesis. Complexity and
difficulties increase with the reactivity of the species to be positioned
and with requirements for additional operations and mechanisms to
effect feedstock acquisition, activation, and transport. All of these
problems arise with synthetic approaches based on high-energy species,
such as radicals and carbenes, of kinds ordinarily considered to be
fleeting reactive intermediates. The use of these species appears to
entail all of the technical difficulties of experimentation under ultra-
high vacuum conditions. That initial explorations of the upper limits of
what can be accomplished by mechanosynthesis have inadvertently
focused attention on this class of systems to the near exclusion of others
that appear more suitable for practical development may have imposed
artificial bounds on progress.

Systems of this sort do have technical advantages in their control of
reaction environments, and advantages in their potential capacity to
synthesize strong covalent solids (structures with local bonding
environments like those of silicon carbide, silicon nitride, and
diamond). Further, the products of such systems lend themselves to
analysis using standard tools in computational chemistry. Molecular
mechanics was developed to model structures with covalent bonds
among first- and second-row elements, and this circumstance has made
it comparatively easy to design and characterize a wide range of
components that combine high performance with synthetic
inaccessibility. These properties are advantageous for exploring of the
potential of advanced mechanosynthesis, but as was recognized in early
work (Drexler, 1992), they are less advantageous as guides for research
targeted on next-generation APM and early-generation productive
nanosystems.
Atomically precise
nanoparts produced with
3.4.5 Scale-up of APM Production
scanning probe technology
A major limitation of scanning-probe-based APM systems will be the
could be used for more extremely low mass throughput that can be achieved by individual
sophisticated nanodevices that perform synthetic operations in a serial manner, when
machines capable of high productivity is measured by the metric of output per unit time per unit
volume production. These mass. However, initial applications that exploit the atomic precision of
productive nanosystems the fabricated structures and need only nanoscopic quantities of high
could then provide the value products will generate the resources to scale up manufacturing
massively parallel product efficiencies. Such applications are discussed in more detail elsewhere,
throughput to make but will include metrology standards, structures designed for specific
macroscopic objects via molecular interactions, quantum computing, and nanoimprint
mechanosynthesis, templates for producing near atomic precision structures with much
selective depassivation, or greater throughput capabilities.
some other process.
Current scanning probe instruments are macroscopic, but
microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) could provide a path to micro
scanning probes and significantly improved manufacturing throughput
via parallelism. Perhaps most importantly, atomically precise nanoparts
produced with scanning probe technology could be used for more
sophisticated nanomachines capable of high volume production. These
productive nanosystems could then provide the massively parallel
product throughput to make macroscopic objects via mechano-
synthesis, selective depassivation, or some other process.
3.4.6 Summary
Scanning probe fabrication is one of many viable pathways to
productive nanosystems. Underscoring the promise of scanning-probe
based fabrication approaches, DARPA has recently issued a Broad
Agency Announcement (BAA) soliciting proposals on Tip-Based
Nanofabrication to make nanowires, nanotubes, or quantum dots using
functionalized scanning probe tips (Foley et al., 1998).
For progress to be made in these approaches to APM, improvements in

the automated systems that provide accuracy and stability of
positioning, and improvements in atomically precise control of probe-
tip structures, will be of central importance.
At this point in development, theory will be a central tool in developing

the different experimental paths leading toward the realization of
scanning probe based APM. For example, computational resources are
now fast enough to enable the high-level study of tooltips, workspaces,
and reactive intermediates in a mechanosynthetic assembly process
(Sattin et al., 2004). Single atom and reactive molecule studies can be
performed based on tooltip or workspace designs that are currently
unachievable experimentally due to current limitations on available
tooltips, workspaces, building blocks, probe stability, and other factors.
Research targets in this area include:

• Atomically precise tooltips
• Multiple degree of freedom nanopositioning
• Improved repeatability and reproducibility of positioning
devices
• Increased total area over which higher precision repeatability
and reproducibility limits can be met
• Manipulator tip designs for improved positioning of
individual molecules and nanostructures (including gripping
ability or selective stickiness, more degrees of freedom and
wider ranges of motion)
• Multi-tip manipulators.
Positional assembly methods that can achieve atomic resolution such as

these scanning probe fabrication pathways have the distinct advantage
of being able to generate a wide variety of output structures with the
same process, simply by changing the design of the structure and having
the automated mechanisms generate that part. These methods avoid
most of the limitations of self-assembly as detailed elsewhere in this
roadmap. As noted by the 2006 NMAB/NRC Review Committee
(NMAB, 2006): “For the manufacture of more sophisticated materials
and devices, including complex objects produced in large quantities, it
is unlikely that simple self-assembly processes will yield the desired
results. The reason is that the probability of an error occurring at some

point in the process will increase with the complexity of the system and
the number of parts that must interoperate.”
Atomically precise self-assembly and protein engineering methods can

and should be pursued as an early potential pathway to achieve
productive nanosystems. However, scanning probe based fabrication as
described above will provide APM capabilities that are unlikely to be
provided with APSA techniques alone. Scanning probe fabrication
provides greater flexibility for assembling small numbers of complex
structures, while APSA promises the ability to produce a more limited
range of atomically precise structures – but in high volume.
In their current forms, none of these scanning probe approaches has

demonstrated sufficient maturity for immediate application by
themselves. The set of building blocks used in any one experiment has
been small and the error rates in fabrication operations have been high.
The technological advances identified above will certainly improve this
situation, as they emerge. In the meantime, hybrid techniques that take
Scanning probe fabrication
advantage of positional assembly, lithographic technology, self-
provides greater flexibility
assembly, and bulk synthesis have provided some spectacular advances.
for assembling small These are described in Subsection 3.5 Hybrid Fabrication.
numbers of complex
structures, while APSA 3.5 Hybrid Fabrication
promises the ability to
produce a more limited A wide variety of atomically precise structures and reagents might
range of atomically precise usefully be incorporated as components into atomically precise
structures – but in high structures. It is difficult to survey the possibilities without sliding into a
volume. survey of large parts of the science of chemistry, and to survey the
techniques for constructing them without exploring large fractions of
synthetic chemistry. Moderate sized components that have been added
fairly recently to the chemical repertoire, that have useful electronic and
mechanical properties, and that are reasonably stable under conditions
that allow binding the DNA/protein nanostructures include:
• Graphene-based structures, C60 and CNTs
• Semiconductor nanocrystals, e.g., CdSe
• Metal clusters, e.g., Au55
These materials generally have specialized synthetic conditions which

are not compatible with DNA/protein nanostructure formation (e.g.,
laser plama techniques for graphene nanoparticles), so near-term
techniques for exploiting them would involve separate synthesis prior to
incorporation into the overall system.
Hybrid fabrication takes advantage of different methods of synthesis to

make atomically precise components, and then employs techniques
such as lithography, nanomanipulation, and electron microscopy to
maneuver, shape, and join the components. Of particular note are the
successes of the research teams of Prof. Alex Zettl and Prof. Carlo
Montemagno in integrating atomically precise structures with bulk
structures using lithographic and nanomanipulation techniques,
highlighted below. In addition, the past efforts of researchers such as
those at Zyvex and Northwestern have resulted in significant advances
in the manipulation, joining, and mechanical testing of carbon
nanotubes (Skidmore et al., 1999; Yu et al., 2000b).
Figure3-3. Example of Hybrid Fabrication. Left, schematic of molecular motor. Right, SEM image of the
working motor. A 250-500 nm rotor was suspended on a double-walled carbon nanotube
(the atomically precise part in the assembly). Electrodes were lithographically fabricated on
either side of the rotor, underneath the rotor (not shown), and around the ends of the
nested nanotube. Varying the voltage differences between electrodes caused the rotor to
spin. Courtesy Zettl Research Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University
of California at Berkeley.
3.5.1 Zettl Group: Synthetic Molecular Motor

In 2003, the Zettl Group at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories and UC
Berkeley fabricated the smallest-known non-biological nanomotor
(Fennimore et al., 2003). The device employed a multi-walled carbon
nanotube (the atomically precise component), which served as both a
bearing for the rotor and as an electrical conductor.
This breakthrough is highly relevant because motors based on this

concept could be used to drive systems of molecular mechanical
components. If the outer nanotube were fractured at the far ends rather
than right next to the rotor (as in this experiment), then the motor-
driven outer shaft could be connected (e.g., by molecular gear teeth) to
other components such as a drive belt, rack and pinion, or other rotary
gears. The technology to attach gear teeth at specific positions has not
yet been developed, but is one potentially important application of
SPVM.
Zettl’s accomplishment is additionally significant because the operation

of the motor is controlled with electrical circuitry, offering precise
control from the desktop. Most importantly, the device is individually
addressable from the desktop as opposed to broadcast architectures
where light or chemical signals trigger operations on a large array of
devices.
In order to fabricate this device new technologies were developed:

• A method for peeling off successive layers of nanotubes
(Cumings et al., 2000).
• Precision cutting of, and selective damage to, nanotubes
(Yuzvinsky et al., 2005).
• A manipulator capable of pulling out the inner nanotube in a
MWNT (Cumings and Zettl, 2000). This spawned a
commercial product (HBS, no date).
3.5.2 Montemagno Group: Biomotor

In 2000, Soong, et al. in Montemagno's group reported the successful
integration of a F1-FTPase biomotor with a nickel substrate and a nickel
propeller (Soong et al., 2000). The motor, which measured ~8 nm in
diameter x 14 nm in length, was able to move the propellers (150 nm
diameter x 750 to 1400 nm long) at a mean velocity of 4.8 rps. The
calculated torque was about 20 pN-nm, and the energy usage was 119 to
125 pN-nm/revolution with an estimated efficiency of ~80%. In this
study, the yield of working propellers was low—five out of 400
propellers in the array were able to turn when the ATP fuel was
introduced into the surrounding environment.
Fabrication involved first creating Ni posts on a SiO2 substrate using e-

beam lithography. The posts measured 50 to 120 nm in diameter and
200 nm high. The F1-ATPase biomotors (the atomically-precise
components) self-attached to the nickel posts by diffusion and binding
through a buffered solution. Nickel propellers measuring 150 nm in
diameter and 750 to 1400 nm long were fabricated separately on silicon
wafers using electron beam lithography. They were then coated with a
biotinylated His-rich peptide (also atomically-precise) and then self-
attached to the gamma unit of the biomotors, also by diffusion and
binding through a buffered solution.
3.5.3 Hybrid Systems As a Pathway to APM
Productive nanosystems, such as those described in Nanosystems
(Drexler, 1992), will utilize molecular motors and actuators that drive
components to perform useful work. The conversion of electrical,
electromagnetic, and chemical energy into mechanical motion is
facilitated by the use of gears, bearings, drive shafts, springs, and other
parts, to direct the motion of components and minimize energy losses.
Thus, research efforts dedicated to produce and integrate these sorts of
components are considered to be a direct pathway in this Roadmap.
Drexler (1981) observed that biological molecular machines and devices

were functionally equivalent to macroscopic parts such as motors,
bearings, pipes, drive shafts, and so forth. Table 3-2 provides a listing of
existing biological nanomechanical devices. Below we highlight research
on two particularly useful machine components: nanobearings and
nanosprings.
Molecular bearings. Nested carbon nanotubes are a natural choice for

a sleeve bearing, because they can rotate freely against each other.
Measurements of the intershell friction show that the static (0.2 to 0.85
MPa) and dynamic (0.43 MPa) friction are very low (Cumings and Zettl,
2000; Yu et al., 2000a; Bourlon et al., 2004). The utility of a nested
carbon nanotube bearing was proven in a working device—the
molecular motor cited earlier (Fennimore et al., 2003). While there have
been proposals to use nested carbon nanotubes as molecular oscillators
and telescoping arms (Kang and Hwang, 2004; Kang et al., 2005; Kang et
al., 2006), to date there have not been any experimental realizations of a
method to drive the motion of the inner or outer tubes.
Nanosprings. As shown by Cumings and Zettl (2000), there is a

restorative force between shells in carbon nanotubes due to Van der
Waals forces. In the case of one nanotube on which they performed
experiments, the force was calculated to be 9 nN when they used a
manipulator to pull an inner nanotube out of its nested environment.
Thus, a nested carbon nanotube can provide a spring-like force, but
unlike a traditional Hookean spring, the nanotube force is constant
(except for at the rest position) and does not increase with the length of
extension.
Multi-wall carbon nanotubes can act as torsional springs, as well

(Williams et al., 2003). They used lithographic methods to fabricate
paddles, or torsional levers, onto nanotubes suspended at each end.
From AFM measurements, for a 7.8 nm, 10 wall nanotube, they
determined that the torsional spring constant was 1.5×10-13 N-m. The
shear modulus, G, was estimated to be 600 GPa—close to the

theoretical value of 541 GPa. Subsequently, they used an applied voltage
to impart an oscillating motion to ~600 x 500 nm paddles (Papadakis,
2004). The paddles were oscillated at various frequencies up to about 9
MHz. Intershell coupling varied considerably between the nanotubes,
resulting in torsional spring constants ranging from 0.37×10-14 to
7.4×10-14 N-m.
We have seen from the range of examples above that some types of
components that would be useful in advanced nanosystems have
already been either fabricated or isolated from biological systems. This
is significant with respect to the often contentious issues of both
feasibility and timeline: groups are building molecular machines now.
The motors are powerful enough, and the machine components are
While there has been efficient enough, to drive complex systems of molecular mechanical
considerable progress in devices and perform useful operations at the nanoscale.1 Carbon
the fabrication and study nanotubes have proven to be quite versatile as both structural and
of individual components, multi-functional materials, however, variability due to structural defects
significantly more progress could potentially cause significant variations in the performance of
toward the integration of nanotube devices. While there has been considerable progress in the
various types of fabrication and study of individual components, significantly more
components into more progress toward the integration of various types of components into
complex systems is needed.
more complex systems is needed. For example, a useful advance would
be the introduction of gear teeth onto carbon nanotubes to convert
For example, a useful
rotary motion into linear motion, and to transfer rotary motion from
advance would be the
one nanotube to another.
introduction of gear teeth
onto carbon nanotubes to More advanced manipulation and construction tools are required to
convert rotary motion into achieve this level of sophistication: the increased complexity means
linear motion, and to moving from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional architecture.
transfer rotary motion (For example, a simple rack and pinion operates on two separate
from one nanotube to planes.) Multiple manipulators, or some form of three-dimensional
another. scaffolding, will likely be required to hold components in place on these
multiple planes during the construction process.
1
This includes mechanical operations of the types illustrated on the NanoRex website,
http://nanoengineer-1.com/content/
Table 3-2. Representative Molecular Motors, Actuators, and Mechanical Devices.
Device Function Representative Reference
Nanotube Motor with MWNT serving as a A. M. Fennimore, T. D. Yuzvinsky, Wei-Qiang Han,
Nanomotor bearing for the rotor and as an M. S. Fuhrer, J. Cumings, and A. Zettl, “Rotational
electrical conductor actuators based on carbon nanotubes,” Nature 424
(July 24, 2003): 408-410
Molecular Molecular actuator able to reversibly B.C. Regan, S. Aloni, K. Jensen, R.O. Ritchie and A.
Actuator push apart two carbon nanotubes Zettl, "Nanocrystal-Powered Nanomotor," Nano
Letters 5 (2005): 1730-1733.
Molecular Nanoseal that can be opened and Nguyen TD, Liu Y, Saha S, Leung KC, Stoddart JF,
Seal closed at will to trap and release Zink JI., “Design and optimization of molecular
molecules – can be triggered and nanovalves based on redox-switchable bistable
reversed by redox chemistry or rotaxanes” J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Jan 24;129(3):626-
changes in pH 34
Molecular Nearly frictionless bearing made from Cumings, J.; Zettl, A. " Low-Friction Nanoscale Linear
Bearings two co-rotating nested nanotubes Bearing Realized from Multiwall Carbon
Nanotubes," Science 289 (2000): 602-604.
Nanosprings Lithographic methods were used to P. A. Williams, S. J. Papadakis, A. M. Patel, M. R.
fabricate paddles or levers onto multi- Falvo, S. Washburn, and R. Superfine, "Fabrication of
wall carbon nanotubes acting as nanometer-scale mechanical devices incorporating
torsional springs individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes as
torsional springs," Applied Physics Letters, v. 82, no.
5 (3 Feb 2003): 805-807.
Telescoping Manipulator capable of extending the Cumings and Zettl, “Low-Friction Nanoscale Linear
Arms inner nanotube in a MWNT Bearing Realized from Multiwall Carbon
Nanotubes”. Science 289, 602-604 (2000)
Biomotors Molecular motors evolved by nature Montemagno, C. D., and Bachand, G. D.,
that perform a variety of mechanical "Constructing nanomechanical devices powered by
tasks biomolecular motors." Nanotechnology 10 (1999):
225-331
“Nanocar” Molecular Feringa motor rotates and Shirai Y, Morin JF, Sasaki T, Guerrero JM, Tour JM,
pushes a protruding molecular group “Recent progress on nanovehicles”. Chem Soc Rev.
against a substrate, propelling a 2006 Nov;35(11):1043-55
molecular chasis forward along an
atomically flat surface, powered by 365
nm wavelength light
DNA-based DNA-based robot arm inserted into a Ding B, Seeman NC., “Operation of a DNA robot
robotic arm 2D array substrate and verified by arm inserted into a 2D DNA crystalline substrate.”
atomic force microscopy to be a Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1583-5
functional nanomechanical device
with a fixed frame of reference
Molecular A molecule called 9,10- Wong KL, Pawin G, Kwon KY, Lin X, Jiao T, Solanki
carrier dithioanthracene (DTA) with two U, Fawcett RH, Bartels L, Stolbov S, Rahman TS., “A
“feet”. Activated by heat or mechanical molecule carrier” Science. 2007 Mar
force, DTA will pull up one foot, put 9;315(5817):1391-3.
down the other, and walk in a line
across a flat surface w/o tracks. Can
carry molecular payloads of CO2.
Molecular A STM tip drives a single 1.8-nm- Franco Chiaravalloti, Leo Gross, Karl-Heinz Rieder,
rack and diameter pinion molecule functioning Sladjana M. Stojkovic, André Gourdon, Christian
pinion as a six-toothed wheel interlocked at Joachim, Francesca Moresco, “A rack-and-pinion
the edge of a self-assembled molecular device at the molecular scale,” Nature Materials 6,
island acting as a rack. The rotation of 30–33 (2007);
the pinion molecule is monitored by a http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v6/n1/abs/n
chemical tag on one cog. mat1802.html

Therefore, high priority targets for new and ongoing research initiatives
are:
• Device uniformity and standardization. Methods to reduce
defects in carbon nanotubes would enable devices with more
consistent performance. In addition, the development of
standard devices and interfaces would enable
experimentation with systems of devices.
• Component integration. Ongoing research to improve
actuators and motors should be coupled with research to
integrate these devices with other components to perform
more complex nanomechanical operations.
• Three-dimensional fabrication. Instrumentation to
manipulate and fabricate devices in three dimensions is
critical to this pathway. New methods to section and join
nanomaterials in 3D structures are needed, and 3D
scaffolding (to support nanotubes, in particular) would be
important advances.
3.6 Atomically Imprecise Techniques

The current largest atomically precise structures are roughly 500 nm in
size.
This is well above the size of the finest features that can be created by
top-down methods.
Some of the advantages that have been suggested for hybrid systems
include:
• Bringing multiple electrical connections to atomically precise
systems
• Exploiting the long-range positional control of top-down
pattern generation, e.g., positioning many instances of an
atomically precise system in a lattice with coherent spacing
over centimeters – e.g., for X-ray diffraction studies to refine
structures, or to make structures like zone plates for X-ray
optics.
3.6.1 Background
Sometime before the year 2000 critical dimensions (CDs) of state-of-
the-art silicon integrated circuit products crossed below 100 nm and, in
doing so, entered the size realm usually associated with
nanotechnology. This industry is currently at the 45 nm technology
node and is encountering significant technology and cost-of-ownership
(COO) hurdles as it works towards future technology nodes at 32 nm,
22 nm, and below. The International Technology Roadmap for
Semiconductors (ITRS) organization maintains and continuously
updates a comprehensive roadmap for lithography for the silicon
integrated circuit manufacturing community, and as a result no such
roadmap will be repeated here. A summary of next-generation
lithography (NGL) technologies that are addressed in that roadmap is:
• Immersion – optical lithography performed in a fluid
medium that serves to reduce the effective wavelength by a
factor of 1/n, where n is the refractive index of the fluid;
• EUV – extreme ultraviolet lithography using 13.5 nm
radiation, usually in conjunction with reflective optics;
• Imprint – nanoimprint lithography, in which a patterned
hard mold is mechanically stamped into a resist using
pressure, temperature and illumination;
• ML2 – Next-generation maskless lithography, a category that
includes a number of maskless technologies such as electron
beam direct patterning as well as maskless optical
lithography.
A summary of possible lithography exposure tool solutions for future

technology nodes is given in the 2006 ITRS update for lithography
available at www.itrs.net.
3.6.2 Optical Lithography

The current limit for optical lithography stands at 30 nm (Hand, 2006).
This would allow roughly 25 separate electrical contacts to a 500 nm
diameter atomically precise system.
3.6.3 Electron Beam Lithography

The availability of new aberration-corrected electron optical columns
for transmission electron microscopes (TEM) and scanning electron
microscopes (SEM), plus the development of sample stages based on
technologies developed for AFM applications, have refreshed the
possibility of extremely high resolution electron beam lithography in
the sub-5 nm regime. However, the lack of resist development in this
area, and especially the importance of resist proximity effects in the
ultimate resolution of electron beam lithography, have limited the
discussion of this technology in APM. Recent activity in the local e-
beam deposition of metals using carboxyl-based chemistries, and the
possible hybridization of e-beam with atomic layer deposition (ALD)

technologies, may make this an interesting area of research and
development for APM as well as semiconductor applications.
3.6.4 Ion Beam Lithography

Since the advent of the first practical liquid metal ion sources more than
20 years ago, the ability to form and focus beams of ions has found great
utility in the semiconductor and related industries. The liquid metal ion
source can produce a wide variety of ions that can be focused to fine
beams, but requires a low melting point metal to form the “Taylor
Cone” from which ions are emitted. There was significant work to
produce ions of a wide variety by alloying them with Ga, and to use an
EXB filter to mass separate the ions, but the brightness of these sources
was impractically low. Most focused ion beam (FIB) microscopes use Ga
as the ion of choice. The Ga ions do generate secondary electrons, and
so can be used to image much like a scanning electron microscope.
However, the Ga ions are heavy and have the advantage, and
disadvantage, of transferring considerable energy to the sample which
typically results in sputtering of the sample. This allows an FIB to ion
mill samples, thereby directly patterning them. In addition the Ga beam
in conjunction with gasses introduced into the FIB instrument can do
both ion beam enhanced etching, and ion beam induced deposition of
materials. However, the resolutions of these processes are limited to a
few nms and are relatively slow processes. FIBs are extremely important
for a number of relevant processes in the IC industry including
photomask repair, circuit edit, and TEM and SEM sample preparation.
It is unlikely that FIB tools will be able to do atomically precise
fabrication because they lack the resolution to do so. In principle an FIB
could be used to expose resists similar to e-beam lithography, but the
heavy ions offer no significant advantages, and in fact several
disadvantages compared to electron beams. They are not typically used
to expose resist. However, the advent of gaseous ions sources may
change this situation. See the following section for the possibilities for
He ion beam lithography.
3.6.5 Helium Beam Lithography

A stable gaseous field He ion source has recently come available and has
been commercialized by ALIS Corp. which was acquired by Zeiss. The
import of the He beam tool is a significantly smaller spots size: ~0.25
nm for the He beam vs. 1 to 1.5 nm for electron beams. The more
efficient and spatially confined manner in which light ions deposit their
energy is also a significant advantage. Although no serious attempts
have yet been made to produce a lithography tool with a focused He
beam from this new type of source, this will surely happen and will
almost surely achieve higher resolutions than possible with e-beams.
3.6.6 Nanoimprint Lithography
Nanoimprint lithography was initially developed by Chou’s research
group in 1996 (Chou et al., 1996a; Chou et al., 1996b) and has since
evolved into several related methods with different approaches. In all
cases, the fine features on a template are mechanically transferred into a
resist which is then cured to retain these features. The resist pattern is
then applied to metal wafers in the semiconductor manufacturing
process. Nanoimprint machines with a resolution better than 50 nm (at
3-sigma) and alignment capability better than 10 nm are commercially
available (Molecular Imprints, no date). Microfluidic channels
measuring 100 nm wide have been fabricated for DNA stretching
experiments (Tegenfeldt, 2004).
3.6.7 Dip Pen Nanolithography™

Dip-pen nanolithography, or DPN. This is a technology based on the
dispense of liquid material into specialized atomic force microscope
(AFM) cantilever/tip assemblies and the deposition of that material at a
tip/substrate interface. The combination of the material volume
dispensed, the dwell time of the tip at a location, and interactions of
humidity and the material/substrate interface can result in the writing
of fine lines. While the technique is quite slow and limited to specific
chemistries, recent demonstration of limited parallel tip writing and
plans for future large parallel tools might make this technology
attractive for APM.
3.6.8 Partially Ordered Chemical Self-Assembly

When intermolecular forces combine to create a single layer of
molecules on a surface or interface, the product formed is called a self-
assembled monolayer (or SAM). These are among the most widely
studied self-assembled system, but they characteristically lack atomic
precision.
SAM formation typically involves a favorable interaction between the

molecule’s head group and the surface (e.g., the gold surface and a
thiol). The stability of the monolayer is often dictated by the strength of
this interaction – weakly held molecules produce monolayers that are
easily disrupted, strongly held molecules produce monolayers that are
more robust. The kinds of applications that a monolayer can be applied
towards are dictated by the stability of that monolayer under those
particular conditions. For example, one of the most widely studied types
of self-assembled monolayers is the organothiol on gold. These
monolayers are very easy to make and a wide variety have been made
and characterized. They have been widely used in a variety of sensing
devices such as chemically modified electrodes, SAW devices, and
QCMs. However, the thiolate head group is subject to oxidation and
these monolayers are thermally labile above about 70°C, making these
materials unsuitable for sensing applications that might encounter these
conditions (e.g., exhaust gas monitoring). In addition, while these
monolayers are locally atomically precise, even well-annealed
monolayers contain grain boundaries and more complex defects. In
alkylthiol layers in particular, the alkyl moiety is tilted by 30 degrees
from the normal to the surface, so the SAM has a directionality, and
therefore a lower symmetry than the gold (typically (111)) surface to
which it is bound. This symmetry breaking allows equally stable
monolayer grains to form with the alkyl groups aligned in any of several
different directions, and therefore allows grain boundaries to form.
Another class of molecules that have been widely used to form self-
assembled monolayers is the organosilanes. In this case, they must first
be hydrolyzed to form the hydroxysilane intermediate, which is the key
component that undergoes the self-assembly process. In this case, the
attractive interaction between the head group and the surface is a
hydrogen bond between the hydroxysilane and the oxide surface. As the
hydroxysilanes aggregate, making a macromolecular aggregate, the
hydroxysilanes slowly start to undergo condensation chemistry, both
among themselves and with the oxide surface, ultimately resulting in a
covalently anchored, and crosslinked monolayer system.
Self-assembly is not only useful in the synthesis of organized

macromolecular arrays, but also in the formation of templates to make
complex three-dimensional architectures. Self-assembly forces are also
responsible for the formation of micelles and vesicles when surfactant
molecules are dissolved in water. Micelles and vesicles can be used as
templates in the synthesis of nanostructured materials (e.g., ceramic
oxides, phosphates, etc.). For example, when certain types of micelles
are exposed to silicate sol-gel reaction conditions, it is possible to wrap
the ceramic phase around the micelle structure and make a highly
porous silicate product. The pore structure of these materials is directly
related to the original micelle diameter, and since these dimensions are
between those commonly encountered for zeolites (15 Å or less) and
macroporous materials (300 Å or more), these materials are commonly
referred to as “mesoporous” materials. Polydispersity of micelle
diameter is on the order of 15% (Hayter and Penfold, 1983).
The silicate coated micelle can also participate in a self-assembly

process. As these macromolecular assemblies precipitate out of
solution, they commonly form an ordered, organized array. Depending
on reaction conditions, it is possible to make hexagonal, cubic, lamellar,
or bicontinuous phase products. Thus, the first generation of self-

assembly is the orderly aggregation of the surfactant molecules to form
the micelle, and the second generation of self-assembly is the
aggregation of the silicate coated micelle to form the mesostructured
greenbody. The surfactants are generally removed via calcination, which
simultaneously serves to rigidify the ceramic backbone, exposing the
latent pore structure.
This provides a very high surface area support for catalyst, sorbent and
sensing/detection applications. Because these pores are generally larger
than simple organosilanes, it is possible to functionalize these internal
pore surfaces using a third generation of self-assembly by installing a
self-assembled monolayer on this mesoporous framework. If these
organosilanes are terminated with chemically specific binding sites, it is
possible to create an ordered hierarchical array of binding sites that
have high chemical affinity for a wide variety of target species. For
example, if we line the pores with alkylthiols, we create a nanoporous
sorbent that has exceptionally high affinity for “soft” heavy metals like
Hg, Cd, Ag and Pb. Heavy metal sorption kinetics are quite fast (often
complete in a few minutes) and selectivity in the presence of common
ions (like Na, Ca, Fe, etc.) is excellent. These self-assembled monolayers
on mesoporous supports (SAMMS™) are thus arrived at via three
successive generations of self-assembly (surfactants to micelles, sol-gel
micelles to mesostructured greenbody, and functionalization via self-
assembled monolayers), and have been tailored for effective separations
of a wide variety of environmentally problematic species (e.g., heavy
metals, radionuclides, oxometallate anions, cesium, iodine, etc.).
Additional self-assembly motifs include electrostatic repulsion of

particles dispersed in a dielectric medium. The “double-layer” repulsion
thus provided allows for three-dimensional arrays of variable scale
periodicity. Such is the case for simple systems where monodispersed
polystyrene spheres are allowed to assemble in water or water dispersed
polymer or prepolymer networks. Colloidal crystalline arrays of this
kind have been known for decades, yet only recently were they exploited
as effective photonic band-gap materials or photonic cystals (see Jiang
et al., 2005). These photonic band-gap composites present unique
polymeric materials with discrete diffraction based upon the inter-
particle spacing and dielectric contrast of the two phases thereby
provide sensing and optical communication platforms based on
attenuation of the matrix or particle distances.

Becker, R. S.; Golovchenko, J. A.; and Swartzentruber, B. S. 1987.
"Atomic-scale surface modifications using a tunneling microscope,"
Nature 325(1987):419-421.
Binnig, G.; and Rohrer, H. 1982. "Scanning tunneling microscopy," Helv.
Phys. Acta 55(1982):726-735.
Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; and Gerber, Ch. 1986. "Atomic Force
Microscopy," Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(3 March 1986):930-933.
Bourlon, Bertrand; Glattli, D. Christian; Miko, Csilla; Forro, Laszlo; and

Bachtold, Adrian. 2004. "Carbon Nanotube Based Bearing for
Rotational Motions," Nano Letters, Vol. 4, No. 4 (2004): 709-712.
Chou, Stephen Y.; Krauss, Peter R.; and Renstrom, Preston J. 1996. J.
Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14(6), Nov/Dec 1996: 4129-4133.
Chou, S.Y. ; et al. 1996. Science 272, 85 (1996).
Cumings, J.; Collins, P.G.; and Zettl, A. 2000. "Peeling and sharpening
multiwall nanotubes," Nature 406 (2000): 586.
Cumings, John; and Zettl, A. 2000. “Low-Friction Nanoscale Linear

Bearing Realized from Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes,” Science 289, 602-
604 (2000)
Drexler, K. Eric. 1981. "Molecular engineering: An approach to the

development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation,"
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, September 1, 1981,
Vol. 78, No. 9, pp. 5275-5278.
Drexler, K.E. 1986. Engines of Creation, Doubleday, New York.
Drexler, K.E. 1992. Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing,

and Computation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York (1992).
Eigler, D. M.; and Schweizer, E. K. 1990. “Positioning Single Atoms with

a Scanning Tunnelling microscope,” Nature 344 (5 April 1990): 524-
526.
Fennimore, A. M.; Yuzvinsky, T. D.; Han, Wei-Qiang; Fuhrer, M. S.;

Cumings, J.; and Zettl, A. 2003 “Rotational actuators based on carbon
nanotubes,” Nature 424 (July 24, 2003): 408-410. See also http://www.
berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/23_motor.shtml;
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/video/nano_bb
and.mov; http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Research-
Review/Magazine/2001/Fall/features/02Nanotubes.html
Foley, E. T.; Kam, A. F.; Lyding, J. W.; and Avouris, P. H. 1998.

"Cryogenic UHV-STM Study of Hydrogen and Deuterium Desorption
from Si(100)," Physical Review Letters, 80/6 (1998): 1336-1339.

Freitas, R.A. Jr. 2005. “A Simple Tool for Positional Diamond
Mechanosynthesis, and its Method of Manufacture,” U.S. Provisional
Patent Application No. 60/543,802, filed 11 February 2004; U.S. Patent
Pending, 11 February 2005; available on line at
http://www.MolecularAssembler.com/Papers/DMSToolbuildProvPat.h
tm
Garibotti, Alejandra V.; Knudsen, Scott M.; Ellington, Andrew D.; and
Seeman, Nadrian C. 2006. “Functional DNAzymes organized into two-
dimensional arrays,” Nano Letters 6, 1505-1507 (2006). Available on line
at http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl0609955
Gu, Qun; Cheng, Chuanding; Gonela, Ravikanth; Suryanarayanan,

Shivashankar; Anabathula, Sathish; Dai1, Kun; and Haynie, Donald T.
2006. “DNA nanowire fabrication,” Nanotechnology 17, R14-R25.
Available on line at http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0957-
4484/17/1/R02/.
Hand, Aaron. 2006 “High-Index Lenses Push Immersion Beyond 32

nm,” Semiconductor International, 4/1/2006. Available on line at
http://www.semiconductor.net/article/CA6319061.html.
Hayter, J. B.; and Penfold, J. 1983. “Determination of micelle structure

and charge by neutron small-angle scattering,” Colloid & Polymer
Science, Volume 261, Number 12, pp. 1022-1030 (December 1983).
Available on line at
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l75g25576w884860/
HBS. no date. Available on line at

http://www.hummingbirdscientific.com/ In addition, nanomanipulators
are available from NanoFactory Instruments
(http://www.nanofactory.com/), Omicron (http://www.omicron-
instruments.com/), and Zyvex (http://www.zyvex.com).
Hersam, Mark C.; Guisinger, Nathan P.; and Lyding, Joseph W. 1999a.
“Silicon-Based Molecular Nanotechnology,” Seventh Foresight
Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology, 15-17 Oct. 1999, Santa
Clara, CA.
http://www.foresight.org/conferences/mnt7/Papers/Hersam/index.html
Hersam, M.C.; Abeln, G.C.; and Lyding, J.W. 1999b. “An approach for
efficiently locating and electrically contacting nanostructures fabricated
via UHV-STM lithography on Si(100),” Microelectronic Engineering
47(June 1999):235-237.
Hla, Saw-Wai; Bartels, Ludwig; Meyer, Gerhard; and Rieder, Karl-

Heinz. 2000. "Inducing All Steps of a Chemical Reaction with the
Scanning Tunneling Microscope Tip: Towards Single Molecule
Engineering," Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(September 2000):2777-2780.
Ho, Wilson; and Lee, Hyojune. 1999. “Single bond formation and
characterization with a scanning tunneling microscope,” Science 286(26
November 1999):1719-1722.
Jiang, P.; Smith D. W. Jr.; Ballato, J. M.; and Foulger, S. H. 2005.

“Multicolor Pattern Generation in Photonic Bandgap Composites,”
Adv. Mater. Vol 17, No. 2, pp. 179-184 (January 2005).
Kang, Jeong Won; and Hwang, Ho Jung. 2004. "Gigahertz actuator of

multiwall carbon nanotube encapsulating metallic ions: molecular
dynamics simulations," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 96, No. 7 (1 Oct
2004): 3900-3905.
Kang, J. W.; Song, K. O.; Kwon, O . K.; and Hwang, H. J. 2005. "Carbon
nanotube oscillator operated by thermal expansion of encapsulated
gases," Nanotechnology 16 (2005): 2670 – 2676.
Kang, J. W.; Song, K. O.; Hwang, H. J.; and Jiang, Q. 2006. "Nanotube
oscillator based on a short single-walled carbon nanotube bundle,"
Nanotechnology 17 (2006): 2250-2258.
Keren, Kinneret; Krueger, Michael; Gilad, Rachel; Ben-Yoseph,

Gdalyahu; Sivan, Uri; and Braun, Erez. 2002. “Sequence-specific
molecular lithography on single DNA Molecules,” Science 297, 72-75
(2002). Available on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1071247
LaBean, Thomas H.; Yan, Hao; Kopatsch, Jens; Liu, Furong; Winfree,
Erik; Reif, John H.; and Seeman, Nadrian C. 2000. “Construction,
analysis, ligation, and self-assembly of DNA triple crossover
complexes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 122, 1848-1860
(2000). Available on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja993393e
Lyding, Joseph. 2004. “Silicon-Based (Carbon) Nanotechnology,”

seminar presented at the University of Sheffield, 27 January 2004.
http://www.shef.ac.uk/sheffield/jsp/polopoly.jsp?a=15946
Mathieu, Frederick; Liao, Shiping; Kopatsch, Jens; Wang, Tong; Mao,

Chengde; and Seeman, Nadrian C. 2005. “Six-helix bundles designed
from DNA,” Nano Letters 5, 661-665 (2005). Available on line at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl050084f
Molecular Imprints, no date. Available on line at

http://www.molecularimprints.com/Products/I250page.html.

NMAB. 2006. Committee to Review the National Nanotechnology
Initiative, National Materials Advisory Board (NMAB), National
Research Council (NRC), A Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the
National Nanotechnology Initiative, The National Academies Press,
Washington DC, 2006.
Oyabu, N.; Custance, O.; Yi, I.; Sugawara, Y.; and Morita, S. 2003.
“Mechanical vertical manipulation of selected single atoms by soft
nanoindentation using near contact atomic force microscopy,” Phys.
Rev. Lett. 90 (2 May 2003):176102.
Papadakis, S. J.; Hall, A. R.; Williams, P. A.; Vicci, L.; Falvo, M. R.;
Superfine, R.; and Washburn, S. 2004. "Resonant Oscillators with
Carbon-Nanotube Torsion Springs," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 93,
No. 14 (1 Oct 2004): 146101.
PC-01. 2007. Personal communication from John Randall, 2007.
Pinto, Yariv Y.; Le, John D.; Seeman, Nadrian C.; Musier-Forsyth, Karin;
Taton, T. Andrew; and Kiehl, Richard A.2005. “Sequence-encoded self-
assembly of multiple-nanocomponent arrays by 2D DNA scaffolding,”
Nano Letters 5, 2399-2402 (2005). Available on line at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl0515495.
Sattin, B. D.; Pelling, A. E.; and Goh, M. C. 2004. “DNA base pair
resolution by single molecule force spectroscopy,” Nucleic Acids Res.
32(14 September 2004):4876-4883.
Sherman William B.; and Seeman, Nadrian C. 2006. “Design of

minimally strained nucleic acid nanotubes,” Biophysical Journal 90,
4546–4557 (2006) http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.080390
Skidmore, George D.; Ellis, Matthew; and Von Ehr, Jim. 1999. "Free
Space Construction with Carbon Nanotubes," Science and Application
of Nanotubes, edited by David Tománek and Richard Enbody, Kluwer
Academic Publishers (1999), pages 373-386.
Soong, Ricky K.; Bachand, George D.; Neves, Hercules P.; Olkhovets,
Anatoli G.; Craighead, Harold G.; Montemagno, Carlo D. 2000.
"Powering an Inorganic Nanodevice with a Biomolecular Motor,"
Science Vol. 290. No. 5496 (24 November 2000): 1555 – 1558.
Tegenfeldt, J. O. ; et al. 2004. “Micro- and nanofluidics for DNA

analysis,” Anal Bioanal Chem (2004) 378 : 1678–1692. Available on line
at www.prism.princeton.edu/Sturm_publications/JP.131.pdf

Williams, P. A.; Papadakis, S. J.; Patel, A. M.; Falvo, M. R.; Washburn, S.;
and Superfine, R. 2003. "Fabrication of nanometer-scale mechanical
devices incorporating individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes as
torsional springs," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 82, No. 5 (3 Feb 2003):
805-807.
Winfree, Erik; Liu, Furong; Wenzler Lisa A.; and Seeman, Nadrian C.
1998. “Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals,”
Nature 394, 539-544 (1998). Available on line at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/28998
Yan, Hao; Park, Sung Ha; Finkelstein, Gleb; Reif, John H.; and LaBean,
Thomas H. 2003. “DNA-templated self-assembly of protein arrays and
highly conductive nanowires,” Science 301, 1882-1884 (2003). Available
on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1089389
Yu, M. F.; Yakobson, B. I.; and Ruoff, R. S. 2000a. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000,
104, 8764.
Yu, Min-Feng; Lourie, Oleg; Dyer, Mark J.; Moloni, Katerina; Kelly,
Thomas F.; and Ruoff, Rodney S. 2000b. “Strength and Breaking
Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load,
Science, 287, 28 Jan. 2000, p. 637-640.
Yuzvinsky, T.D.; Fennimore, A.M.; Mickelson, W.; Esquivias C.; and

Zettl, A. 2005. "Precision cutting of nanotubes with a low-energy
electron beam," Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 , (2005): 053109. and Erratum, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 87, (2005): 069902.

Topic 4 Modeling, Design, and Characterization
4.1 Introduction
The processes of modeling, design, and characterization apply the
discoveries of basic scientific research to support the cycles of
development that drive advances in technological capabilities. These
processes are interwoven and mutually supportive.
Modeling and design guide fabrication by providing a theoretical

framework for generating and testing structures, devices, and entire
systems by means of computational experiments. Modeling and design
help choose targets for fabrication, and have proven to be valuable in
areas as different as automobiles and molecules.
The characterization of raw materials and complex systems provides

data with which to assess not only the utility of a design, but the
accuracy of models used to derive it. The iterative comparison of theory
and experiment is important because many computational models of
nanoscale systems (e.g., molecular mechanics and dynamics methods)
are based on adjustable parameters, and the quality of the model and its
results benefit from better experimental data. Thus, the
characterization process, aided by continued advancements in imaging
and measurement technologies, provides the data needed to validate or
drive revision of both proposed designs and the underlying physical
models that describe their properties and operation.
4.2 Characterization Background

Improvements in characterization and in the computational resources
vital to modeling and design have greatly advanced developments in the
scientific disciplines that provide the foundations for nanoscience and
nanotechnology. The available characterization methods span the range
of familiar molecular study, from the investigation of bulk materials at
the macroscale (refraction/reflection studies, stress and stiffness
measurements, tribology), to the study of molecules in periodic systems
(crystallography, electronic spectroscopy, vibrational spectroscopy), to
the study of individual molecules at defined positions (atomic force
microscopy, scanning tunneling microscopy). As in modeling and
design, the choice of characterization method is highly dependent on
the desired property to be measured, and currently available techniques
can far exceed the level of detail required for the characterization and
testing of materials. Currently available techniques for the characteri-
zation of nanostructures are sometimes bottlenecks in development,
but are adequate to support ongoing progress in AP nanosystems and
APM: the complete characterization of atomic scale properties is not on
the critical path.
Some commonly
modeled properties In self-assembled structures, the subunits are multi-atomic and are
important to AP typically independently characterized. In many instances, knowledge of
components and their relative positions in a larger structure immediately provides
systems:
atomic-scale information based on the prior characterization of the
subunits themselves. With the structure and properties of individual
• Ground and excited
system components defined during their initial fabrication, characteri-
state geometries
zation can focus on properties at the device and component levels.
• Molecular dynamics
behavior
• Energy of reactants, 4.3 Modeling and Design Background
products
• Energy of transition Nanoscience and nanotechnology are on the verge of tremendous
state barriers advances in modeling and design that originate in macroscale
• Alternative chemical engineering, chemistry, and computer science. The modeling and
reaction products design infrastructure that has developed around macroscale engi-
• Protein folding and neering, including computer aided design-based mechanical and
unfolding electrical engineering, provides a solid foundation of protocols and
• Electrostatic design interfaces that are now being extended to software for molecular
interaction energies
modeling and design. The fields of quantum chemistry, molecular
• Dynamic friction,
thermalization
dynamics simulation, and molecular visualization combine to provide
• Transport of thermal
the modeling and design tools that enable the study of matter at the
energy atomic scale, from molecular orbital calculations of small molecules to
• Transport of the study of binding interactions between biomolecules, such as DNA
electron, holes and proteins, that span well into the nanoscale regime.
• Molecular transport
through proteins, Nanoscale modeling and design merge macroscale engineering prince-
zeolites, and pores ples with quantum mechanical and classical mechanical models of
• Electrostatic dipoles matter, all the while driving demand for more data, more accurate
and higher models, faster algorithms, and improved computational resources. Just
multipoles
as modeling and design will set the pace of development for many
• Vibrational and
atomically precise technologies, developments in computers and
electronic transition
states and energies algorithms are driving the extension of atomistic models, the modern
• Optical refraction, basis for our understanding of matter, into the nanoscale regime.
absorption
• Nonlinear optical The validity of a design and the predictive power of a theory-driven
coefficients design process are heavily dependent on the accuracy of the theoretical
• Spin-spin interaction model(s) being used. The choice of quantum mechanical, classical
dynamics mechanical, or hybrid descriptions for the study of molecular and
nanoscale systems is one determined by both theoretical necessity and
available resources. While quantum mechanical methods exist that can
approach the absolute limits of accuracy achievable by modern
computational chemistry, the use of these methods is currently limited
to diminutive chemical systems (< 20 atoms) because of computational
cost.

The selection of a quantum mechanical or classical mechanical descrip-
tion of a system is one driven, within the limits of available resources, by
the properties being considered, with decades of both molecular mech-
anics and quantum chemical developments available from which a More commonly
researcher can consider a system for their properties. The difference modeled properties
between modeling and design for the study of both chemical and nano- important to AP
components and
scale systems is clear: while the field of molecular modeling is one that systems:
has readily accepted a formal division between quantum and classical
methods for the study of materials, the field of design is not naturally
• Magnetic domain
subject to that constraint. While molecular modeling studies occur dynamics
within the limitations of each theoretical method, the goal of nanoscale • Donor/acceptor
design is to produce the best structures or systems possible according to group geometries
a set of value metrics, making the use of multiple modeling approaches • Enzyme, catalysis
(because of their known limitations) an integral part of the design binding modes
process. • Solvent-based
dependences of
molecular properties
4.3.1 Atomically Precise Technologies Span the Range of
• Atomic/molecular
Available Modeling Techniques ionization energies
• Atomic/molecular
The modeling and simulation of materials, devices, and systems within electron affinities
the nanoscale regime (1 to 100 nm) requires atomistic or near-atomistic • Molecular orbital
(“reduced model”) methods. In systems that are designed to perform energies, diagrams
chemical or mechanosynthetic operations, processes involving funda- • Chemical reaction
mental changes to the electronic structure of materials, the modeling heats of formation
and design process requires quantum chemical methods or “reactive • Conformational
energy differences
potential” methods, empirical approaches that include as part of their
parameterization process terms that account for the relative energies of • Molecular volumes,
surface areas
chemical bonds. In systems or assemblies that do not undergo chemical
• Molecular self-
reactions but instead maintain fixed atomic connectivity in the course assembly processes
of a series of operations, classical mechanical approaches have proven • Geometries,
to be effective. Nowhere has this division in modeling techniques been electrostatics at
more relevant to the study of structure and function in nanoscale surfaces
systems than in the modeling of the enzymatic (quantum mechanical) • Crystal energies,
and conformational (classical mechanical) properties of proteins. While dynamics
the broad range of molecular modeling techniques enable the complete • Solvent-accessibility
atomistic representation of matter across the nanoscale, the application in macromolecules
of many techniques is limited by computational resources. • Stabilities of
aggregates and
ordered arrays
Computational chemistry must balance the advantages of accurate
• Homology models,
theoretical models to describe the properties of atoms and molecules geometric
against the limitations of available computational resources. Molecular relationships
mechanics and semi-empirical quantum chemical methods have far
lower computational demands than rigorous ab initio methods and
density functional theory. Their formulation is largely pragmatic,
implemented for the interpretation, then prediction, of chemical data

during the decades when room-sized computers had a fraction of the
power of the most modest personal computers today.
Improvements in resources and algorithms to reduce the computational

cost of calculations have made all theoretical tools more available, yet
the most exact methods are barely capable of property prediction in the
nanoscale regime due to the cost of computation. Thousand-atom
classical dynamics simulations and ten-atom ab initio calculations
tested the limits of computational resources at the beginning of the
personal computer revolution, yet today, entire nanoscale devices and
complex biological systems (>106 atoms) can be simulated by classical
mechanics methods, while hundred-atom systems can be readily treated
by ab initio methods and density functional theory on computer
clusters employing commodity hardware. Developments in computing
power and algorithms have pushed the tools of computational
chemistry into the nanoscale regime, with each new generation of
processor extending the speed, scale, and accuracy of calculations.
4.3.2 Atomically Precise Technology Design

Requires Multi-Level, Multi-Scale Modeling
By their nature, atomically precise technologies and their operations
require atomistic models. The dependence of the properties on
atomistic structure is particularly important when considering
structures whose dimensions are in the nanoscale (1 to 100 nm) regime,
as the atomic building blocks of these objects are within only two orders
of magnitude of the size of the structures themselves. Beyond this,
however, domain-specific requirements, including quantum
mechanical, atomistic classical mechanical, and “reduced model”
approaches, vary widely. Processes that involve bond rearrangement,
unusual structures, electron transport, or electronic state transitions
typically demand quantum-mechanical modeling of electron distri-
butions and energies. Processes that involve atomic motion, molecular
displacement and deformation, or any types of structural analyses that
preserve the atomic connectivity of the system under investigation are
typically addressed by molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics
methods. To reduce computational burdens in chemically massive
structures that do not require consideration of all atoms, reduced
models are common, treating groups of atoms as single bodies, or (in
the limiting case) subsuming them into non-atomistic models of elastic
or even rigid solid bodies. At this level, the techniques are those familiar
to macroscale modeling and design.
Choosing a specific model always involves trade-offs of the speed of

computation, the size or amount of structures modeled, and the
required accuracy of the results. Quantum methods in particular
embrace a range of models (levels of theory) that differ widely in their
computational tractability: some allow dynamical studies of thousands
of atoms; others strain available computational resources in order to
provide great precision in describing small molecules. Molecular
mechanics and dynamics models rely on direct approximations to the
forces among atoms, and currently scale to systems with up to millions
of atoms. The accuracy of the latter methods (for suitably chosen classes
of systems) can be judged by the fact that they are used to gain insights
into the balance of weak interatomic forces responsible for the
geometry and dynamics of proteins and other biomolecules. The
development of combined quantum mechanical and molecular
mechanics methods for the study of chemical systems (QM/MM
methods) is founded in the realization that the local changes to
electronic structure (bond breaking, formation) in macromolecules or
molecular aggregates can be dependent on the larger system. This is
readily apparent in the simulation of protein function, where enzymatic
activity is confined to a specific location but the geometry and dynamics
Integrating atomistic and
of that location are a function of the protein structure as a whole. The
further reduction of atomic detail, through the use of subsumed non-atomistic models at
detail/rigid body models for molecules or continuum models (such as different scales is key to
implicit solvent models and non-atomistic surface models) enable the enabling practical design
removal of a further level of detail that would otherwise require and simulation of large,
tremendous increases in atom count and, therefore, computational cost. complex atomically precise
nanosystems.
Extending the scale, scope, and accuracy of atomistic modeling
techniques is a high priority and can greatly facilitate atomically precise
technology design and implementation. Integrating atomistic and non-
atomistic models at different scales is key to enabling practical design
and simulation of large, complex atomically precise nanosystems. This
is an area of ongoing research activity, driven by areas related to, but
developed in parallel with, nanotechnology, including biochemistry,
supramolecular chemistry, and materials science.
4.3.3 Atomically Precise Technology Developments Demand

Innovations in Computer-Aided Design
Design and molecular modeling are, at their cores, indirect tools for the
prediction of chemical properties and phenomena. The process of
design at the atomic level connotes the application of models, be they
physical or mathematical, for the generation of new structures with
desired properties. As such, design and molecular modeling are
formally distinct areas within theoretical chemistry that have evolved
towards tight integration, with design now commonly a process of the
application of the predictive powers of the computational methods
within molecular modeling for the in silico generation and testing of
structures or whole systems. The design process for molecules and
nanosystems exploits physical descriptions based on diverse molecular
modeling and continuum model techniques, with the results and
interpretation of generated data subject to their approximations and
computational restrictions.
The utility of design at the nanoscale depends on the adequacy of the

theoretical model(s) used to describe the physical system. In many
instances, potential designs can be tested and modified at timescales
and expenses far below those of physical experiments. These modeling
and design exercises can be of great value provided that they are
accurate enough to provide guidance that yields even moderate
improvements in the success rate of the more expensive physical
experiments. Accordingly, even highly imperfect models can play a
valuable role.
Each domain of atomistic modeling (e.g., quantum mechanical,

atomistic classical mechanical, reduced model methods) creates distinct
demands on computer aided design (CAD) tools. Some of these
demands involve data visualization, while others involve data
representation, and its integration with methods employed in
subsequent analyses that may or may not be atomistic in nature.
(Examples include the study of electrostatic interfaces or molecular
lock-and-key binding, both of which can employ surface analyses based
on previous calculations of atomic positions).
At all but the largest scales, conventional approaches to design are

An important objective is inapplicable because of the discrete nature of component structures:
to expand multi-level one must drop the assumption that dimensions, electrical properties,
modeling and design tools, etc., can be varied in a continuous way. This is in many ways more
as has been achieved for fundamental than differences in the applicable device physics.
enzyme systems, to mixed
models of diverse kinds. Multi-level modeling is motivated by the great differences in scope and
computational cost associated with different modeling techniques, and
this will need to be integrated into CAD tools and the design process in
two distinct ways. The first is the application of different techniques to
different parts of systems, for example, applying quantum methods to
describe reactions, while applying molecular mechanics methods to
describe the structures that support and constrain the reacting com-
ponents. This has been achieved, for example, in modeling structure/
property/function relationships in enzymes. Expanding this principle to
mixed models of more kinds is an important objective. The second role
for multi-level modeling is design refinement. In this application, less-
accurate, lower-cost techniques are used for exploratory purposes to
identify systems that are worth further investigation using more-
accurate, higher-cost techniques, a process that maximizes throughput
of designs by leveraging the speed of computation with a priori

knowledge of the limitations of the employed models. It will be
important to provide smooth integration of this methodology into CAD
tools for developing atomically precise technology systems.
4.3.4 Characterization Methods Enable Refinement of

Models, Designs, and Fabrication Methods
The development cycle in systems engineering proceeds through
modeling and design (for example, computational simulation) iterations
until an apparently satisfactory result is achieved. Fabrication and
physical testing then provide the ultimate feedback on the success of a
design. The quality of this feedback determines its effectiveness in
guiding any necessary revisions in the fabrication method, the model, or
the design. It is crucial to know, for example, whether a failure results
from a difference between what was designed and what was made (a
fabrication problem), or from a difference between the properties
predicted and the properties observed (a modeling problem).
In nanoscale modeling and design processes that employ the quantum

and classical mechanical tools of computational chemistry, issues based
on modeling accuracy are either straightforward (classical mechanics)
or difficult (quantum mechanical) to overcome. As an entirely empirical
class of tools, classical mechanical models of atomic motion are readily
capable of being refined based on the results of experimental
observation, subject to either the modification of the underlying
parameters or to the increase in computational resources required to
accommodate additions to the force field model used to define all
atomic interactions. The same is not true of ab initio methods or
density functional theory. In the case of ab initio methods, the benefits
and limitations of Hartree-Fock and post-Hartree-Fock (MPn, CI, CC,
CASSCF, etc.) methods are inherent to the mathematical
approximations used to describe the quantum nature of chemical
systems. For density functional theory, where the density functionals
used to model the static correlation of electrons are empirically derived,
the procedure of density functional optimization is far from trivial
because, unlike the nearest-neighbor(s) parameter-based molecular
mechanics methods, changes to density functionals are not limited to
local changes in structure. Within each quantum chemical theoretical
model, improvements to ab initio and density functional theory
calculations largely come through improvements in the description of
electronic wavefunctions, made possible by the selection of larger and
more computationally demanding basis sets.
Improved characterization methods generally will aid in the develop-

ment of atomically precise nanosystems, but the needs and ingenuity of
the scientific community have already provided remarkably capable
tools that can help to refine those computational models that use
experimental data in of their parameterization process. Nanoscale and
atomic-scale sensing, imaging, and metrology have immense capabilities
and are growing rapidly. Improved tools for characterizing atomically
precise nanosystems will be of great value, but the present state of the
art provides an adequate basis for progress.
4.3.5 Advances in Atomically Precise Fabrication

Technologies Can Simplify Modeling Requirements
Advances in atomically precise fabrication will enable practical applica-
tions of an increasing range of structures and phenomena even beyond
the nanoscale. This will, in turn, increase demands on modeling
techniques by driving expansion of their scope and increasing the
demand for faster and more routine methods that are applicable in the
context of nanosystem design.
In one important respect, advances in atomically precise fabrication can

make successful modeling less demanding by reducing the design space
that must be modeled to test proposed systems. Advanced fabrication
techniques can, in many instances, make components with improved
stability, rigidity, and performance. These improvements tend to make
the structural behavior of components less sensitive to small errors in
model energies, and they can also be used to increase the margin of
safety by which components satisfy design requirements. This again
reduces sensitivity to errors. Constraints within the fabrication process
can also be included in the modeling process and used to, for instance,
remove possible degrees of freedom from a simulation. Such simplifi-
cations are difficult to incorporate into chemical simulations, where the
system is inherently chaotic, but are readily included in mechano-
synthetic, epitaxial, or various programmable processes at the nano-
scale, where systems can be constrained to operate in a more controlled
manner.
As a consequence, currently accessible products of AP fabrication may

require more advanced modeling techniques, while analogous advanced
products may not. This inverse relationship is illustrated by molecular
machine systems, where protein-based devices remain a great challenge
to modeling, but not to fabrication, while machines made of rigid
atomically precise components can be easy to model despite being
inaccessible to current and near-term fabrication techniques. This
relationship facilitates, to an unexpected degree, the use of current
modeling techniques to explore and evaluate the general properties of
classes of systems in order to weigh their potential value as longer-term
development objectives.

4.3.6 Atomically Precise Technology Development Can
Succeed Despite Deficiencies in Modeling Techniques
In assessing the near-term potential for the design and fabrication of
atomically precise systems, it is necessary to assess the adequacy of
existing modeling techniques for supporting the design process. This is
a matter of particular concern because there exist many physical
systems of interest for which the predictive power of existing tools
capable of modeling structures and properties at nanoscale dimensions
is very poor, often giving qualitatively incorrect results. For instance,
many quantum chemical methods are inadequate for predicting bond
dissociation energies, electronic transition energies, or the association
of weakly interacting molecules or structural motifs. Molecular
mechanics methods are extremely susceptible to errors in atomic
geometry and connectivity in the absence of algorithms to confirm the
chemical accuracy of starting structures, a limitation that affects both
the accuracy of calculations and the usability of such methods by
untrained users across nanoscience disciplines.
For design problems, the adequacy of a model cannot be assessed

without considering the practical question it must answer. Design can
succeed, and even be reliable, in domains where models have substantial
inaccuracy and can give qualitatively incorrect results. What is required
for success is not universal predictive accuracy, but instead the ability to
identify a suitable class of systems within the domain. To be suitable for
the purpose of design, members of this class must be sufficiently well-
behaved to be insensitive to modeling errors, and the class must include
members that satisfy the relevant set of design requirements. What
constitutes sufficient insensitivity, however, typically depends on
whether these requirements are stringent or loose, hence the impor-
tance of knowing the practical design question before judging the
adequacy of a model.
Even a very incomplete knowledge can aid a technology development

program. Even a weakly predictive model can speed development by Even a weakly predictive
directing experimental research away from likely failures and toward model can speed
systems that are viable candidates for success. While the Edisonian development by directing
efforts of experimental trial and error alone can be an acceptable experimental research
development method (provided that success is sufficiently common and away from likely failures
that trials are not prohibitively slow or expensive), model-based and toward systems that
approaches even with limited tools provide a level of rational design are viable candidates for
that can aid in the application of experimental precedent and chemical success.
intuition.

4.4 Design Considerations for Self-Assembled and
Directly Assembled Nanostructures
The availability of both self-assembly and directed (mechanical,
programmable) approaches at the nanoscale for the generation of new
materials or complex systems provides both considerable flexibility in
possible fabrication routes and considerable challenges for
computational modeling and design techniques.
For structures to be made by means of tip-directed atomically precise

mechanical processes, product geometry results directly from a
programmed sequence of motions of a tool with respect to a workspace.
This directness applies both to current and next-generation atomically
precise technologies based on scanning probe instruments and to
envisioned advanced-generation productive nanosystems. Domain-
specific CAD requirements in this area are driven chiefly by the need to
model discrete structures with appropriate device and process physics.
Design tools with improved In atomically precise self-assembled systems, by contrast, structure and
combinatorial search fabrication become related in a far more intimate way. At every stage of
algorithms can aid assembly, at least one component must be free to diffuse in a solvent,
“supramolecular enabling it to explore all possible positions and orientations to find its
mechanosynthesis”, in unique, intended binding site. This process requires that the
which blocks could be component be soluble, that it has a surface complementary to that of its
designed with comple- intended binding site, and that all other surfaces of the workspace and
mentary surfaces that the component be sufficiently non-complementary that stable binding
strongly favor desired is precluded. These requirements are added on top of functional
binding. requirements. The available materials and environmental conditions in
nature favored complex structure generation by way of self-assembly
methods, a general process that has been exploited with tremendous
success in the field of supramolecular chemistry and, increasingly, the
control of molecular crystallization.
Identification of designs in which components have appropriate

surfaces and matching interfaces characteristically requires an
automated computation search mechanism. In many DNA structures,
"sticky ends" serve as complementary interfaces, while in proteins,
folding requirements can be viewed as extending self-assembly
constraints to the interior of the molecule. In both instances, design
tools today rely on searches in the combinatorial space of alternative
monomer sequences. Improving success rates and product performance
will likely require improvements in this class of algorithms, chiefly in
the definition of suitable objective functions. Such tools will also serve
useful roles in the design of much larger nanoscale systems based on
self-assembled components, where complementary surface interactions
can be combined with control of the sequence of assembly. With
suitable nanomechanical systems, blocks with complementary surface
interactions could be guided to the region where they are to bind,
relying on complementarity to select a precise position and orientation
within the looser, imposed constraint. By analogy with Lehn’s concept
of “supramolecular chemistry”, in which chemists exploit non-covalent
binding interactions, this might be termed “supramolecular
mechanosynthesis”.
Future-generation atomically precise self-assembled systems, perhaps

exploiting components produced by new classes of atomically precise
productive nanosystems, appear likely to share this requirement for
integrating search-based operations in CAD tools and design processes.
A similar need for searches will arise when tip-based atomically precise
mechanical systems are used to manufacture structures that satisfy
surface-defined constraints by means of structures that depart greatly
from crystalline order.
4.4.1 Modeling Challenges at the Nanoscale

Modeling and design at the nanoscale is on a leading edge of
developments in computational chemistry, pushing research in
algorithms, visualization, and theoretical models. Nanostructures and
nanoscale devices often challenge our ability to study matter by
atomistic (both classical and quantum chemical) methods. Nanoscale
modeling and design, like nanoscale materials and devices themselves,
often straddle classical and quantum mechanical descriptions. Larger-
scale models may straddle the boundary between atomistic and
continuum models, where the latter are adopted because of their great
computational economy.
The use of classical atomistic or even continuum approximations for

modeling and design is largely pragmatic, founded in computational
necessity. The cost in computational resources to handle even
moderately-sized molecular systems using quantum mechanical
descriptions is beyond what even the largest computational facilities can
provide. The challenges of large, atomistic models can be enormous
even in classical approximations, as shown by the scale of resources
applied in the supercomputer and distributed computing studies of the
protein fold-prediction problem.
4.4.2 Molecular Graphics Developments and the

Visualization of Nanoscale Structures and Information
The visualization of chemical information is as important to the
researcher as the underlying physics is to the validity of the model.
Advances in molecular graphics, like advances in the scales of molecular
modeling, have a long history of expansion and improvement as a result
of advances in general computational technology. While the
visualization of molecules and their interactions by way of graphical
molecular modeling programs have greatly aided the experimentalist in
chemical research by diminishing the conceptual barriers to theoretical
methods, the same graphical implementations have also aided
theoreticians by providing a rapid means to identifying errors in models
that can result from fundamental limitations in the theoretical methods
themselves.
An important aspect of molecular graphics relevant to nanoscale design

and simulation concerns the relevance of atomistic representations of
chemical information. Considerable information can be obtained from
non-atomistic visualizations, for example, of the DNA helix and base
pairing. This reduction in model complexity extends to all areas of
visualization, where the properties deemed relevant to a single
calculation or simulation can be defined purely by the shape of a
molecule and not its atomic constituents. Many properties important to
nanoscale design, such as charge distribution, dipole moment,
molecular volume, and surface geometry, need not be defined with
respect to individual atoms. In the case of surface renderings for the
identification of binding regions, possible interfaces for assembly, or the
determination of molecular volumes, suppression of atomistic detail can
provide a more useful display of the important physical properties.
Again, computational biochemistry provides excellent examples: the

reduction of protein to secondary structure (ribbons and geometric
objects for representing alpha helix and beta sheet motifs) or surface
renderings (charge analyses, binding pocket visualization) has been vital
both for understanding structure and function and for presenting this
information to other researchers. Similar representational strategies will
be widely applicable in the design and evaluation of AP nanosystems.
4.4.3 Smart Design Methodologies and Issues Related to

Model-Based Chemical Knowledge
The visualization of molecular information has driven both open source
and commercial software development that has broadly expanded the
utility of molecular modeling programs to researchers that need not be
familiar with the underlying theory to apply the methodologies to
chemical design. The advantages and limitations of molecular modeling
techniques extend into the design process, with atomistic design
processes subject to both constraints imposed by the modeling
limitations and an absence of “chemical knowledge” on the part of
graphical programs. Simply, atom-derived properties, such as chemical
reactivity and stability, are not readily accounted for within molecular
design and CAD systems, leaving proposed designs subject to critical
evaluation by researchers even with exhaustive computational studies
completed at high levels of theory.
A major obstacle to accurate atomistic design within the nanoscience

community as a whole is also to be found in the incomplete Efforts to expand the
incorporation of chemical bonding and atomic geometry information in usability of computational
visual molecular modeling packages. This aspect of visual molecular modeling and design
modeling packages has less to do with limitations of the molecular systems for
modeling methods available in the program and more to do with the nanofabrication must
chemical knowledge of the user. Any effort to greatly expand the include the ability to
usability of computational modeling and design systems for identify flaws in atomic
nanofabrication must include, as part of its functionality, the ability to connectivity and
identify, if not correct, flaws in atomic connectivity and geometries geometries from standard
from “standard models,” both for those users unfamiliar with the models, for a diverse range
complexities of chemical bonding (a likely situation as the tools of
of users.
interdisciplinary research become available in advance of
knowledgeable users) and for chemists and biologists fully
knowledgeable in chemical bonding but unable to readily visualize
problematic locations in chemical structures due to the shear size of the
structures being designed.
In the absence of intelligent systems capable of comparing calculated

geometries against databases of all known molecular motifs or
theoretical models of atomic geometry and chemical bonding, the final
validation of any design still lies with the researcher. The extent to
which chemical knowledge can be programmed, or rules governing
chemical bonding and non-covalent interactions can be developed to
obviate the need for intensive pre- and post-processing by researchers,
into a graphical design system to simplify nanoscale design is an
important area of future study that extends from molecular modeling
packages, themselves still developing such functionality.
4.5 Modeling
The predictive modeling of mechanical and electronic phenomena in
the 1 to 100 nm range is being extended through improvements both in
computational algorithms and computer technology. The rapid
improvements in processor performance have driven theoretical work
in all fields of science and are well known. However, while processor
performance alone could drive the extension of theoretical studies to
new size regimes, the development of efficient, scalable software has
also had tremendous impact on the field of molecular modeling by
enabling independent researchers to use commodity hardware in
individual laboratories to approach the computational speeds of
dedicated supercomputers.
Nanoscale science presents new challenges to both experimentalists and
theoreticians. While experimentalists are exploring novel properties of
materials at this scale, theoreticians are exploiting computational
resources powerful enough to study nanoscale systems using molecular
modeling tools developed for small systems in computational chemistry.
Theory and computation become useful in an area of science when their

predictions become reliable enough to help improve the success rate of
experiments, and they become essential to an area of technology design
when their accuracy is sufficient to guide the selection of system-level
implementation targets. The balance of theoretical accuracy and
computational cost frequently motivates molecular researchers to
perform survey-style studies of model systems using lower-quality
computational methods, followed by final studies of candidate systems
by high-level methods. The growth in computational resources has
made this approach less important for structures of the sort to which it
had been applied, but extension of molecular modeling approaches into
the nanoscale reintroduces the benefits and limitations of low-accuracy
models as a screening mechanism for design, and as a guide to the
requirements for applying more accurate and expensive methods.
Models with substantial inaccuracies and limited applicability can

nonetheless provide effective tools for system-level design in suitably
selected domains. There are several reasons for this:
• System-level designs can in some instances be restricted to
employ only relatively well-understood components
(consider the role of DNA oligomers in structural DNA
nanotechnology).
• Designs may incorporate margins of safety, making them
insensitive to small errors in predicted geometry or energy.
• A system-level design may permit many alternative
component-level implementation options, and modeling may
strongly suggest that one or more will work, yet not specify
which.
This is a particularly important realization regarding the relationship

between nanoscience in general and the emerging technologies of
nanosystems engineering.
4.5.1 Computational Infrastructure

Efforts in computational nanoscience span the range of resources and
facilities, from individual researchers performing computational studies
at academic institutions to major national laboratory investigations and
method development projects using (or designing) state-of-the-art
computational resources. Further model refinements and improved
computing resources will increase the reliance of researchers on
theoretical methods for the design and testing of materials and complex
devices.
Providing researchers with computing resources powerful enough to

address their questions with the highest or most appropriate levels of
theory available has been addressed at the US national level through the
establishment of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications
(NCSA), the support for major computational facilities at many of the
national laboratories, and the provision of funding through many of the
national agencies (such as NIH, NSF) for computational facilities at
individual universities. A benefit of concentrating resources at national
facilities is the development of communities of computational chemists
familiar with the many programs available for theoretical study and the
knowledge of the strengths and limitations of various theoretical
methods with respect to research projects proposed by applicants.
4.5.2 Information Provided by Molecular Modeling Methods

Within the field of molecular modeling are the mathematical
foundations for the property calculation of any atomic assembly,
including both static properties (geometry, potential energy surfaces)
and dynamic properties (excitations, transition states, electron
transport). Molecular mechanics/dynamics methods, while providing
the least realistic descriptions of atomistic matter by their neglect of
electronic structure, have proven instrumental in computational
chemistry by enabling the study of macromolecules and their
interactions, the dynamics of classes of molecules in their crystal cells,
and the thermal transport properties of materials, to name only a few
applications.
The clearest division between the available methods in molecular

modeling is between methods that provide electronic structure
information and those that do not. This division separates classical and
quantum mechanical descriptions of matter, a recurrent theme in much
of the discussion of modeling and design. Neglecting computational
demands, higher levels of theory are generally capable of calculating the
properties of lower levels of theory. In the case of post-Hartree-Fock
methods capable of predicting electronic transitions and excited state
geometries, these same methods can also be used to calculate the
ground state geometries of molecules to very high levels of accuracy.
Quantum chemical methods not only can perform the same geometry
and dynamics calculations as molecular mechanics methods, but
provide the foundations for many molecular mechanics methods. These

derive their force field parameters from ab initio and density functional
theory calculations.
A brief summary of some of the properties available from molecular

modeling techniques are provided below. The division between classical
and quantum mechanical methods, as well as quantum chemical
methods suited for “static” (ground state) and “dynamic” (excited state,
transition state) electronic processes, are used to divide the property
prediction of the available techniques.
Non-Electronic Structure Property Prediction (Molecular

Mechanics/Molecular Dynamics). Ground state geometries,
dynamical behavior, conformational energies, self-assembly processes
(such as protein folding and unfolding), electrostatic binding and
repulsion energies, transport of thermal energy, molecular transport
through materials, ligand binding geometries and positions, molecular
volumes and surface areas, steric and electrostatic surface interactions,
crystal dynamics and phonon energies, solvent-accessibility in
macromolecules…
Static (Ground State) Electronic Structure Property Prediction

(Hartree-Fock and post-HF Methods, Density Functional Theory).
(Including the above non-electronic properties) energies of reactants
and products in chemical reactions, energies of alternative/side
products, rigorous electrostatic dipoles and multipoles, energies and
intensities of vibrational transitions (IR, Raman, neutron), nonlinear
optical coefficients, solvent dependences on molecular properties,
ionization energies, electron affinities, occupied molecular orbital
energies (and approximate unoccupied orbital energies), chemical
reaction heats of formation, rigorous electron density and charge
distributions (Mulliken, Löwdin, Hirshfeld, Bader, Weinhold, etc.),
force constants/parameters for molecular force field calculations…
Dynamic (Excited State, Transition) Electronic Structure Property

Prediction (Time-Dependent DFT, CC, CI, CASSCF, MCSCF).
(Including the above properties) energies of transition state barriers,
transport of electrons/holes, electronic transition energies and spectral
predictions, oscillator strengths of electronic transitions, spin-spin
interaction dynamics, geometries and relative energies of transition
states, modeling of catalytic pathways…
4.5.3 Molecular vs. Solid-State Molecular Modeling

The defining characteristic of molecular-based modeling, as it applies to
nanoscale modeling, is that the environment within which the
calculation is being performed is finite. Molecular-based methods are

concerned primarily with the “system” and not the “surroundings,”
although some variants on molecular theory can address how a
molecule/system might behave in a medium (such as through solvent
modeling or the application of external electric/magnetic fields). In
single molecules or discrete clusters of interacting molecules,
molecular-based methods provide a wealth of information, including
the relative binding energies of intermolecular interactions. When the
surroundings (such as solvent) do not interact appreciably with the
system, molecular-based methods can provide excellent agreement with
experiment.
The isolated-molecule approximation breaks down when the system

under study is bound within a periodic framework (such as a molecular
crystal), as the system and surroundings are now one and the same.
Solid-state theory, the application of periodic boundary conditions to
include the surroundings within a calculation, is the “infinite”
counterpart to molecular theory. Solid-state theory is the theory of
materials, be it atomically-pure materials, mixed atomic lattices of
insulating/conducting/semiconducting materials, amorphous solids, or
molecular crystals. Solid-state theory provides means for studying the
macroscopic properties of materials, such as those important to
materials scientists and engineers.
Solid-state methods have only recently reached the level of detail and
accuracy of molecular methods through the introduction of density
functional theoretical implementations of solid-state code and the
availability of computational resources capable of performing the
calculations. Periodic boundary conditions can now be employed for the
study of crystalline materials, amorphous materials modeled with
periodic boundary conditions in order to artificially impose
environmental constraints in a more physically realistic manner (as
opposed to the solvent shell methods of molecular quantum theory),
and idealized structures that exploit the spatial restrictions of the
periodic boundary conditions (such as by fixing the separations of
interacting structures bound along lattice planes).
4.5.4 The Multiple Levels of Modeling and Design

Theory-driven design at the nanoscale is subject to the strengths and
limitations of the many methods available in computational chemistry
for the study of matter. It is important to understand the limitations of
each level of theory due to their approximations, as some of these
limitations make the theories wholly inadequate for answering some
questions. The strengths, limitations, and some of the likely future
directions of many molecular modeling methods are summarized in
Tables 4-1 through 4-5.
Table 4-1. Modeling, Design, and Characterization Using Empirical Methods
Projected Typical Projected
Capabilities Limitations Advances Applications Applications
Subsection: Molecular Mechanics — >106 Atoms
Energy minimiza- Most force field The continued Molecular structure Rapid prototyping of
tion and optimiza- development and generalization of force rectification prior to structural motifs and
tion of ground state available parameters fields to many types of quantum chemical mechanical processes
geometries are biased to biology chemical systems studies at the nanoscale
Molecular surface Final structures and Computational develo- Binding and steric Provides the
generation for relative energies of pments, algorithm interaction studies for computationally
electrostatic maps, conformations are only developments to push supramolecular feasible basis for
binding geometries as accurate as the force these methods into the complexes, biological atomistic mesoscale
field being used mesoscale regime molecules representations
Subsection: Molecular Dynamics — >106 Atoms
Simulation of Dynamics simulations Continued extension to Rapid prototyping of Studies of thermal
molecular motion and conformational larger and systems small molecule stability of non-
and the sampling of energies are only as (beyond a complete designs covalent structures
conformational accurate as the force virus)
space field being used
Bases for explicit Absence of libraries of Scaling methods and Thermal, vibrational, With QM/MM
solvent models, parameters for non- analyses to extend over steric, and structural implementations,
periodic boundary biological systems various chemically studies of molecules, modeling of covalent
conditions (crystals), means some systems relevant time scales intermolecular bond assembly
amorphous solids, cannot be studied or (vibrations to protein interactions and processes in
and molecular are treated using folding); multiscale macromolecules macromolecular,
aggregates approximate modeling integration nanoscale systems
parameters
Linear scaling of Inorganic clusters, solid- Environmental Simulation of Simulations of
bonded state species are dependence of molecular/ion transport phenomena
interactions, insufficiently accounted transition state transport mechanisms in nanofabrication
quadratic scaling of for in most current geometries with within processes
non-bonding implementations quantum mechanical macromolecules
interactions integration
Structural accuracy Electronic structure Enzymatic activity, Ligand docking Docking/interaction
achievable through properties (excited bond simulations, design studies of self-
parameterization of states, transition formation/breaking, strategies for assembling
relevant terms structure) cannot be structural changes computational drug macromolecules,
(covalent and accurately modeled due upon optical excitation design synthetic proteins
electrostatic) to lack of electron- with quantum
dependent data mechanical integration
New force fields or False minima prediction The continued Coarse grain, reduced Steric, electrostatic
modifications to and the absence of generalization of force model simulations design basis for
existing force fields structural/chemical fields to many types of that classically pseudo-real-time
can be generated knowledge bases can chemical systems, parameterize non- modeling and design
rapidly using result in the generation periodic solids, etc. atomistic of macromolecules,
experimental or of physically unrealistic representations of surfaces
theoretical methods minimum energy forms atomic systems
Subsection: Reactive Potentials (REBO, AIREBO, BEBOP)
Capable of No differentiation Parameterization across Surface interactions Extension to larger
modeling bond between spin a larger range of the and atomic systems, solvent-solute
breaking, bond multiplicities; no Periodic Table, modes deposition, or surface simulations
formation inclusion of electron- of atom binding mechanosynthetic of chemistry
electron repulsion simulations
Uses experimental Extremely limited range Extension to larger MD-based simulations Simulations of
parameters (such as of parameterized unstable/metastable of chemical (solution- atomistic nanoscale
ionization energies) atoms, least element- structures beyond phase) phenomena mechanical processes,
as parameters complete MD-based quantum chemical (bond breaking, including tribological
method feasibility formation) studies

Table 4-2. Modeling, Design, and Characterization Using Semi-Empirical Methods
Subsection: General Types — >1000 Atoms
Semi-empirical methods are fast and far more computationally reasonable than ab initio calculations
Subsection: CNDO, INDO, MNDO, MINDO/3, ZINDO, AMI, PM3, MNDO/d, OM1,OM2, PM5, RM1
Computational cost The many limitations Application in solid- Most every Stepping-stone
of integral and known failures of state chemistry for the commercial molecular computational
evaluation in ab semi-empirical methods property prediction of modeling package approaches to higher-
initio methods is are inherent to the molecular and atomic includes semi- level calculations, dry-
replaced by approach. Their utility in solids (phonons and empirical methods run methodological
parameter-based chemical design is thermochemistry, because of their studies in combined
evaluation, saving dependent on the nonlinear optical speed and molecular QM/MM studies
considerable properties being properties) accuracy, making
computation time considered. them broadly applied
Non-nearest- As a parameterized Linear-scaling Rapid prototyping of In the absence of
neighbor approach based on sets implementations molecules, transition MM/MD methods that
interactions are of common molecules, (MOZYME) for initial states, excited state have parameters for
neglected, yielding molecules that deviate quantum chemical geometries, functional constituent atoms,
significant speed- significantly from these optimizations and groups, and some semi-empirical
ups in calculations sets (non-common property prediction of classes of aggregate methods become the
of large systems organics, non-biological macromolecules and intermolecular route to energy
(with many molecules, etc.) are (proteins and beyond) interactions minimization and
electrons) subject to greater errors structural studies
Lowest level of Molecular properties Implementation of Prediction of Application to
quantum chemical that were not addressed methods that consider electronic spectra quantum chemical
theory to provide in the parameterization transition metals for (ZINDO), molecular studies of entire
chemically relevant process are not (or are organometallic studies, vibrations, heats of proteins and DNA
information for poorly) accounted for inorganic solid studies formation, structures (already
molecules (such as excited states) conformational possible)
energies
More recent semi- Each semi-empirical Implementation as the Structure prediction Tool for solid-state
empirical methods level of theory is limited quantum mechanical and optimization crystal predictions,
account for to regions of the component of (geometry study of
intermolecular Periodic Table (with QM/MM studies for beautification) prior to polymorphism in
interaction energies transition metals rapid prototyping of more molecular solids,
and geometries neglected in many nanoscale processes computationally- assembly processes at
parameterization sets) demanding ab initio surfaces
studies

Table 4-3. Modeling, Design, and Characterization Using ab initio (Hartree-Fock) Methods
Subsection: Hartree-Fock (RHF), Unrestricted HF (UHF), R-Open-Shell HF (ROHF), >100 Atoms
Chemically logical The lack of static The use of HF theory Reasonable level of First, most likely level
interpretation of electron correlation as a tool for theory for survey-type of theory for first-
electronic structure (beyond the Pauli computational computational studies principles quantum
calculations is exclusion principle) chemistry is dependent of molecules and chemical calculations
possible via orbital- results in inaccurate on algorithms and strongly interacting of nanoscale
based methods predictions of spin states computational molecular clusters structures
and energies resources at large
scales
Isodesmic energy The lack of dynamic The key improvement As no parameters are Stepping-stone
calculations of electron correlation to HF application in used and classes of computational
chemical systems means dispersion nanoscience is basis sets do exist that approaches to higher-
(direct comparisons energies are predicted extension of the account for most level calculations, dry-
of conformations, to be too low, affecting calculations with larger every element in the run methodological
reactants, and the calculated strengths basis sets (Slater-type periodic table, studies in combined
products with of intermolecular orbitals, all-electron property prediction is QM/MM studies
identical basis sets) interactions sets for metals, possible for nearly all
effective core molecules
potentials for transition
metals, etc.)
Reasonable scaling When electronic states As the foundation for The HF solution In the absence of
(N3 possible. As are close in energy at post-HF methods, any (wavefunction) is the MM/MD methods that
implemented in certain atomic developments in non- formal basis for have parameters for
many programs, N4 geometries, the Born- DFT electron numerous electron constituent atoms, HF
scaling; N = number Oppenheimer correlation methods correlation methods, methods become the
of basis functions) approximation breaks will involve variational methods route to energy
compared to post- down, requiring the use developments in HF minimization and
HF methods. of “ non-adiabatic” (scaling of systems, structural studies
(nuclear/electronic) parallelization of
wavefunctions calculations)
Most fundamental Unoccupied orbital As the basis for hybrid Rapid generation of In the absence of
and theoretically energies are not HF-DFT methods molecular orbital semi-empirical
sound quantum predicted well due to (“B3LYP”), extension of descriptions for methods that have
chemical treatment absence of electron these DFT approaches interpretive, predictive parameters for
of molecules correlation, making will follow from studies of chemical constituent atoms, HF
excited state and general improvements systems, organic methods become the
transition state in HF algorithms chemistry reactions fastest route to
calculations suspect energy minimization
and structural studies
The foundation for Chemical bond Advances in scaling Common quantum Nanoscale simulations
all post-HF breaking and molecular and parallelization will chemical method for that do not involve
quantum chemical dissociation are not enable HF application use in QM/MM changes in electron
methods accurately modeled in macromolecule studies of enzymatic spin as part of
studies and, eventually, activity, chemical structural changes
nanoscale studies assembly processes

Table 4-4. Modeling, Design, and Characterization Using Density Functional Theory
Subsection: LAD (PWC, VWN)— >100 Atoms
LDA - local density approximation, uses the density at points for evaluation of matrix elements
Subsection: GGA (such as LYP, P86, B88, BP, BLYP, BOP, HCTH) — >100 Atoms
GGA - generalized gradient approximation - uses both position and gradient of density at that position (corrects LDA over-
binding)
Subsection: Hybrid HF-DFT (such as B3LYP, B3P86) — >100 Atoms
DFT electron correlation based on HF wavefunctions
Static electron Static-only electron The most important Virtually all molecular Better property
correlation is correlation means DFT limitation is the properties are prediction than HF
included in DFT dispersion forces are not absence of dispersion obtainable by DFT methods for
calculations, accounted for correctly, forces. Numerous calculations, with nanoscale
recovering more of leading to the under- modeling efforts are accuracy limited by simulations, far faster
the real energy of prediction of binding directed at including the absence of than post-HF methods
molecules than HF energies for weak these forces into dispersion and the for studies in the same
methods complexes calculations lack of classes of size regime
excited state density
functionals
Implementations for Density functionals are Dispersion force Solid-state property Continued extension
atom-centered derived empirically. inclusion by way of the prediction, including to the study of solid-
(atomic basis sets) Therefore, dozens of addition of empirical geometries, phonon state materials,
and planewave density functionals exist dispersion terms, calculations, binding including molecular
(periodic boundary that all have strengths inclusion within energies, general crystals and
condition) codes and weaknesses. pseudopotentials, thermodynamics amorphous solids
hybrid DFT/MPn properties
methods
The most cost- The molecular property Linear scaling Implementations of Greater accuracy of
effective (resource- in question determines approaches to reduce time-dependent DFT deposition processes
based) electron the best choice of the computational cost for property than HF methods,
correlation method density functional at a of macromolecular prediction (electron meaning the
available for a given given level of theory system and transport through complete and
level of accuracy and choice of basis set nanostructure studies molecules, excited accurate modeling of
states, mechanosynthetic
electron/molecule systems is possible
scattering)
As commonly Density functionals are Development of new Car-Parrinello With fully
4
implemented, N developed for ground density functionals for molecular dynamics implemented time-
scaling achievable state systems. Excited- excited electronic state implmentations dependent DFT,
(N = number of state DFT calculations studies of molecules already allow for DFT- photophysical studies,
basis functions) are fundamentally and nanostructures MD studies of solids, dynamical studies,
suspect because of this. aggregates, molecular electronics
conformational space design and simulation
sampling becomes possible

Table 4-5. Modeling, Design, and Characterization Using Post Hartree-Fock Methods
Capabilities and Limitations, Method Summary Scaling
Subsection: Moeller-Plesset Perturbation Theory (MPn)
Inclusion of dynamic electron correlation means dispersion forces are accounted for in the optimization of n = 2, M5
weak intermolecular complexes and some intramolecular interactions n = 3, M6
80% to 95% of the electron correlation of a system is recoverable depending on the order of the calculation n = 4, M7
(80% at n = 2; 95% at n = 4)
Non-variational method, leading to greater basis set superposition error (BSSE) and reduced accuracy of
intermolecular interaction energies, over-binding of some systems, over-stabilization of free radicals
Subsection: Configuration Interaction (CI)
Static and dynamic electron correlation method based on the expansion of a reference wavefunction into
excited-state electronic configurations
Complete CI calculations can achieve the exact solution to the non-relativistic Born-Oppenheimer
approximation Schrodinger equation at considerable computational cost.
Various levels of CI can be implemented in a calculation, including:
CI with single electron configurations (CIS, excellent basis for electronic spectra prediction) M5
6
CI with single and double electron configurations (CISD) M
7
Quadratic CI, all single and double configurations and perturbative inclusion of triple excitations (QCISD(T)) M
Multi-Reference CI (MRCI) M8
CI with single, double, triplet, quartet configurations (CISDQT) M10
Subsection: CBS/Extrapolation Methods
Complete basis set/extrapolation methods are excellent for the accurate calculation of reaction barriers, M7
depositions
Subsection: G2, G3
Used to calculate thermodynamic quantities such as enthalpies of formation, atomization energies, ionization M7
energies, and electron affinities
Subsection: Multi-Configuration Self-Consistent Field (MCSCF)
Full CI and orbital optimizations, used for bond breaking, forming, ground-excited state calculations, M7
Recovers much of the static correlation energy (dynamic correlation energy obtained from CI)
The choice of the active space to include in the calculation is not always obvious (not a black box approach,
you still have to know some quantum theory)
Subsection: Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field (CASSCF)
Excellent reference calculations for recovering dynamical correlation energy M7
The “active space” of the calculation is defined by the user, requiring testing or considerable understanding of
the system and method
Subsection: Coupled Cluster (CC)
Possible to achieve the exact solution to the Schrodinger equation for a given basis set at high enough levels
CC including double excitations only (CCD) M5
CC including single and double excitations (CCSD) M6
CC including single and double excitations with triple excitations treated approximately (CCSD(T)) M7
CC including single, double, and triple excitations (CCSDT) M8
Subsection: Generalized Valence Bond (GVB)
A limited form of MCSCF, multi-reference method
GVB-Perfect Pairs (GVB-PP)
GVB-Restricted Configuration Interaction (GVB-RCI)
Subsection: Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC)
Evaluation of integrals with correlated basis functions numerically using Monte Carlo methods Indet.
Scaling values are approximate, highly method-dependent, and provided as the information is available. Provided values are
only for estimation purposes; M = number of electrons

4.6 Instrumentation and Characterization
Instrumentation and characterization techniques are being driven
forward by scientific research requirements, and their applications in
developing AP nanosystems chiefly add to this existing demand. This
section offers a few remarks regarding the relationship between this
area and the requirements for AP nanosystem development. The take-
away message is that existing techniques are broadly adequate, but that
improvements in some areas could be of great value.
Characterization of structure and functional properties is critical to

developing components and systems on any scale, including the
nanoscale. Individual high-spatial-resolution methods typically provide
a subset of the total structural information desired, and artifacts and
ambiguities are a pervasive vulnerability, commonly addressed by
applying multiple methods to a single problem. Improvements in
breadth, robustness, and precision of characterization tools are
important because they can speed acquisition and improve the quality
of information about products. This, in turn, can improve models and
enable faster cycles of design and testing in the development process.
For example, characterization is often the bottleneck in design cycles
for both DNA and protein engineering. Some of these challenges could
be addressed by improvements in the capabilities and the availability of
cryoelectron tomography instruments.
4.6.1 Atomic-Scale Characterization

Methods that provide lower-resolution information about the nature
and distribution of properties in a collection of nanoscale objects Complete characterization
sometimes provide the necessary answers for a design process. For of atomic scale properties
example, in structural DNA nanotechnology, overall geometry at or is not on the critical path
near the helix level often suffices to indicate success or failure in making to development of, or
a structure, and most of the atomic-scale detail is then implied by utilization of, productive
general knowledge of DNA structures. nanosystems. Rather,
targeted characterization
Nontheless, atomic-scale characterization is of obvious importance to of desired aggregate
atomic-scale technologies, and a wide range of methods exist. Table 4-6 properties on the device-
provides an overview of techniques and instruments. and component-levels are
needed.

Table 4-6. Characterization Methods, Sample Requirements, and Information Obtained
Method Sample Requirements Information Gained Comments and Caveats
Scanning Electron Placement/deposition Particle size, morphology, Must be conductive or coated (e.g., with Gold);
Microscopy on substrate; high component segregation Sample must be stable in the electron beam
(SEM) vacuum compatible
method
Environmental SEM Placement/deposition Particle size, composition, Lower resolution in wet mode; Same general
on substrate; high hygroscopicity issues as SEM
vacuum compatible
method
Focused Ion Beam Typically up to 1” thick, Topography, 3-D Excellent for TEM sample preparation as well
SEM up to 8” diameter composition,
crystallography
Transmission Placement/deposition Phase and structure, Excellent spatial resolution; Sample must be
Electron on substrate; high composition, chemical stable in the electron beam
Microscopy/High vacuum compatible state in some cases
Resolution TEM method
< ~150 nm thick
Cryo-Electron < ~100 nm thick 3-D structure Can be chemically specific (for example, a gold
Tomography (tomography) nanoparticle label)
X-ray Diffraction, On substrate (film Crystalline phase, average -193 to +1000 °C temperature range; Inert
Powder X-Ray ~20nm), as a powder crystallite size, amorphous atmosphere or rough vacuum sample
Diffraction (~0.1g), or as single content, crystal lattice environment
crystals constants (space group),
molecular geometry
3-D Atom Probe Conductive, needle 3-D reconstruction of Very high resolution;
shaped sample including minor Sample preparation is often challenging
UHV compatible elements to 0.1 atom %
Scanning Helium Vacuum compatible Topography, chemical Early stage commercialization
Ion Microscopy method contrast
Secondary Ion Mass Flat, <9mm thick Atomic/isotopic Usually coat sample with gold; ~50 nm
Spectrometer UHV compatible distribution resolution
(NanoSIMS)
Scanning Probe Placement/deposition Topography, nanoparticle Excellent spatial resolution; low sample
Microscopy1 on substrate; Requires a size, shape, electrostatic, numbers; slow scan speeds; air, liquid or
fairly flat sample magnetic and mechanical vacuum environment
properties
Auger Electron Placement/deposition Size, shape, surface Conductive sample
Spectroscopy/Scann on substrate; high composition, 3-D ~20 nm resolution
ing Auger vacuum compatible composition
Microscopy method
X-ray Photoelectron Placement/deposition Average surface Modeling of complex systems improves
Spectroscopy on substrate; high composition, chemical understanding
vacuum compatible state
method
Time of Flight Placement/deposition Average surface Molecular information; good at measuring
Secondary Ion Mass on substrate; high composition, molecular trace contaminants
Spectrometry vacuum compatible state ~100 nm resolution
method
Small Angle X-ray Particles in liquid Local chemical Requires synchrotron sources
and Neutron environment, geometry
Scattering and size of nanoparticles,
clustering of nanoparticles
X-ray Absorption Particles in liquid Oxidation state, solvation Requires synchrotron sources
Fine Structure structure
Proton Induced X- Placement/deposition Elemental composition Sample must be stable in the particle beam
ray Emission on substrate; high
vacuum compatible
method

Table 4-6. Characterization Methods, Sample Requirements, and Information Obtained (Continued)
Method Sample Requirements Information Gained Comments and Caveats
Terahertz (THz) Solid-state, in liquid, Low-frequency vibrational Many solvents are good THz absorbers (limits
Spectroscopy ambient conditions modes, inter- and utility); resolution currently limits use
intramolecular interactions
Raman Airborne, in solution, as Energies of vibrational Low signal/noise; optical selection rules make
Spectroscopy solid-state samples, or modes, molecular for partial determination of molecular
deposited/mounted on conformation, inter- and vibrations
substrate intramolecular interactions
Fluorescence Ambient, in liquid Intermolecular distance Fluorescent tag required
Resonant Energy
Transfer
Fluorescence Return Ambient, in liquid Diffusion, clustering using Used in biological systems
After fluorescent probes or
Photobleaching auto-fluorescent species
Fourier Transform Airborne, in solution, as Energies of vibrational Low signal/noise; optical selection rules make
Infrared solid-state samples, or modes, molecular for partial determination of molecular
Spectroscopy deposited/mounted on conformation, inter- and vibrations
substrate intramolecular interactions
Ultraviolet-Visible Airborne, in solution, as Electron transition states, Important characterization tool for molecular
Spectroscopy solid-state samples, or survey of potential electronics applications
deposited/mounted on photochemistry, optical
substrate properties
Coherent and Solid-state and powder Normal modes of Absence of optical selection rules means all
incoherent inelastic samples vibration, phonon vibrations are observed; resolution limits at
-1
neutron scattering (intermolecular) modes, higher energies (>1000 cm )
spectroscopy (CINS, molecular geometry via
IINS) selective deuteration (IINS)
Nuclear Magnetic Molecules, Inter- and intra-molecular Experiments can take hours to days for high
Resonance (NMR) macromolecules in structure, atomic quality spectra; Two-dimensional methods
solution; selective for connectivity, geometry of available (COSY, EXSY, HSQC, HMQC, HMBC,
many isotopes (such as secondary structure, NOESY, TOCSY, J-spectroscopy)
1
H, 10B, 11B, 13C, 14N, 15N, monitoring progress of
17
O, 19F, 23Na, 29Si, 31P, chemical reactions
35
Cl, 195Pt)
Solid State NMR Solid-state samples; Molecular structure, Disordered solids, interfaces can be analyzed;
selective for many local chemical and operando monitoring is a possibility
isotopes magnetic environment
Dynamic Laser Light Particles in liquid Size distribution down to 5
Light must not be absorbed by liquid; Typically
2
Scattering nm very low ionic strength liquid
Phase Analysis Light Particles in liquid Charge state of particle
Large ionic strength dynamic range
Scattering
Disc Centrifuge Particles in liquid Size distribution down to 3 Broad range of particle size determination in
Photosedimentation nm complex mixtures
1
Atomic Force Microscopy, Non-Contact AFM, Scanning Tunneling Microscopy, many
derivatives.
2
Also Photon Correlation Spectroscopy
4.6.2 Operando Characterization

Many nanoscale characterization methods cannot probe samples in
native-like or desired operating-like (operando) environments.
Expanding the capability to analyze nanoscale materials under such
realistic conditions in real-time is a critical need. Further, many studies
have demonstrated that the physical and chemical characteristics of

nanoscale materials may change over time and under varying
environments. Providing the capability to image or measure these
changes in real time under realistic environments would speed the rate
at which new information regarding, for example, the chemical and
physical structure of catalytic active sites could be determined.
Observation of interactions between nanosystems and living cells
presents challenge of a similar kind.
Operando nanomaterial characterization needs include monitoring the

following: in situ particle size and shape, in situ composition or function
(including charge; surface energy; functionalization, magnetic,
electrical, or optical properties, etc.); surface chemistry at the nanoscale
including fractional coverage and thickness of coatings on
nanoparticles, and quality of particle dispersion in a solid phase.
4.6.3 Quality Control

There is a need to develop deployable process-monitoring tools that can
Access to existing tools is be used to ensure nanomaterials and nanoproduct consistency on a
on the critical path. manufacturing scale. Such instruments would include real time, on-line
Current characterization characterization tools and rapid quality control (QC) tests for samples.
tools provide a broad Real-time, in-line measurement techniques are needed to provide
spectrum of capabilities reproducible control of properties such as particle size and distribution.
(ranging in resolution from Improved analytical tools and process control will go a long way to
the unnecessarily high to achieving zero defects in final materials, reducing waste, and turning
the somewhat low. nanomaterials manufacturing into a commodity.
4.6.4 Access to Tools and Multidisciplinary Effort

The need to apply multiple analysis methods stretches the ability of
many researchers and students and should encourage collaboration and
the use of centralized user facilities. Examples in the US include the
DOE Nanotechnology User Facilities and the DOE Environmental
Molecular Sciences Laboratory.
The R&D effort as a whole must closely interweave developments in

fundamental understanding of nanoscale properties, new materials
synthesis methodologies, new manufacturing techniques, new
characterization and control techniques, and new modeling tools.
Progress in nanosystems development requires iterative cycles of
design, modeling, fabrication, and characterization. All these steps are
necessary, and each step and field of application presents a rich and
diverse set of multi-disciplinary challenges.

Nanotech Roadmap 2007 Main

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nanotech Roadmap 2007 Main

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2 0 0 7

Notice for Content Prepared by Staff Employed at DOE National Laboratories

Technical Leadership Team

Project Management Team

Front Cover Design

Nanotechnology Roadmap Participants i

* Provided material for inclusion in this Nanotechnology Roadmap.

ii Participants Nanotechnology Roadmap

* Provided material for inclusion in this Nanotechnology Roadmap.

Nanotechnology Roadmap Participants iii

Supported through grants to the Foresight Nanotech Institute by the

iv Participants Nanotechnology Roadmap

Atomically precise technologies (APT) hold the potential to meet many

Recently identified approaches for using products of today's APM to

Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary v

APM Products Will Have Broad and Growing Applications

Call to Action for APT Advancement

Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary vii

Close cooperation between government, academia, and industry is

As a foundation for action, establish research objectives and

• Develop a broad technology base for APT and apply this to

viii Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

Support work on modeling and design software that facilitates AP

• Prioritize modeling and design software as critical elements • Essential feature:

Develop tools and processes to support tip-directed APM.

• Develop stable, reproducible, atomically precise scanning

• Extend and exploit the recent development of configurable,

x Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

Explore objectives for system development. • Structural DNA

Looking forward, we see both incremental payoffs and grand challenges

Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary xi

Development Area Horizon I

• Bio-based productive nanosystems

• Biomolecules (DNA- and protein-

• 3D DNA frameworks, 1000

xii Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

• Artificial productive nanosystems • Scalable productive subsystems in

• Composite structures of ceramics, • Nearly reversible spintronic logic

• Casings, “circuit boards” to • Complex systems of advanced

• Artificial immune systems • Artificial organ systems

Nanotechnology Roadmap Executive Summary xiii

xiv Executive Summary Nanotechnology Roadmap

Acronyms and Abbreviations................................................................ xix

Part 1—The Road Map

Atomic Precision: What, Why, and How? .......................................... 4

Atomically Precise Manufacturing....................................................... 8

Atomically Precise Components and Systems ................................... 14

Modeling, Design, and Characterization ............................................ 17

Agenda for Research and Call to Action ............................................ 45

Part 2—Topics in Detail

Topic 1 Components and Devices ..................................................... 63

Topic 2 Systems and Frameworks ...................................................... 87

Topic 3 Fabrication and Synthesis Methods .................................... 113

Topic 4 Modeling, Design, and Characterization ........................... 151

Part 3—Working Group Proceedings

Nanotechnology Roadmap Contents xv

xvi Contents Nanotechnology Roadmap

xviii Contents Nanotechnology Roadmap

3DAP 3-D Atom Probe

Nanotechnology Roadmap Acronyms xix

xx Acronyms Nanotechnology Roadmap

Leadership provided by Battelle and access to conference facilities at

About the Roadmap Document