Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
Hearing impairment is the most frequent sensory deficit in human populations, affecting more than
250 million people in the world. Consequences of hearing impairment include inability to interpret
speech sounds, often producing a reduced ability to communicate, delay in language acquisition,
economic and educational disadvantage, social isolation and stigmatisation. It may be worsened by
some medical conditions such as hypothyroidism, diabetes, and possibly hyperlipidemia, among
others.
Most congenital and childhood onset hearing loss is included as sequelae to various disease and
injury causes already included in the Global Burden of Disease Study. Examples include otitis media,
memingitis, rubella, congenital anomalies and non-syndromal inherited hearing loss. Adult-onset
hearing loss was not separately analysed in the original Global Burden of Disease for 1990 (1). The
leading causes of adult-onset hearing loss are presbycusis (age related hearing loss) followed by
noise-induced hearing loss. This paper reviews global data on hearing loss among children and
among adults, and estimates the global burden of adult-onset hearing loss. In addition, it provides
estimates of the prevalence of hearing loss among children and adults at various levels of severity.
In the Version 1 estimates for the Global Burden of Disease 2000 study, published in the World
Health Report 2001 (2), adult-onset hearing loss was the 2nd leading cause of YLDs at global level,
accounting for 4.6% of total global YLDs. This paper summarises the data and methods used to
produce the Version 3 estimates of adult-onset hearing loss burden for the year 2000, as published
in the World Health Report 2003.
Table 2.2 GBD 2000 case and severity-level definitions for adult-onset hearing loss
Hearing loss, adult onset Cases of adult onset hearing loss due to ageing or noise exposure. Excludes
hearing loss due to congenital causes, infectious diseases, other diseases or
injury.
Moderate hearing loss Hearing threshold level in the better ear is 41-60 dBHTL (averaged over 0.5, 1,
2, 4kHz). (Not able to hear and repeat words spoken in normal voice at 1
metre). Person may or may not use a hearing aid
Severe hearing loss Hearing threshold level in the better ear is 61-80 dBHTL (averaged over 0.5, 1,
2, 4kHz). (Not able to hear and repeat words using raised voice at 1 metre).
Person may or may not use a hearing aid
Profound hearing loss Hearing threshold level in the better ear is 81 dBHTL or more (averaged over
0.5, 1, 2, 4kHz). (Not able to hear words when shouted into better ear). Person
may or may not use a hearing aid
Thailand 17 provinces (31) 1988-90 41 dBHL, better ear 7,499 All ages
Thailand Bangkok + 5 (31) 1986-87 41+, 61+, 81+ dBHL, 1,797 All ages Total only
provinces better ear (0.5, 1, 2 kHz
bilateral/better ear)
Indonesia Bandung (23- 1997-98 26+, 41+, 61+ 81+ dBHL, 5,604 All ages Age (41+ only)
municipality & 24) (1,2,4 kHz bilateral/better
district ear)
Myanmar Yangon (23- 1997-98 26+, 41+, 61+ 81+ dBHL, 5,604 All ages Age (41+ only)
24) (1,2,4 kHz bilateral/better
ear)
Vietnam 6 selected (32) 26+, 41+, 61+ 81+ dBHL, 13,120 6 months Age x sex
provinces (3 (1,2,4 kHz bilateral/better and older
north, 3 south) ear)
Nigeria 3 states: Akua (33) 2000- 26+, 41+, 61+ 81+ dBHL, 8,975 All ages Age (41+ only)
Ibom, Benue, 2001 (1,2,4 kHz bilateral/better
Katsina ear)
Prevalence
Study Sample
Country population Ref. Years Definition used size Age range %
Developed Review (34) Review 41+ dBHL better ear Childhood 0.05 – 0.23
UK Trent region (35) 1985-1993 40+ dBHL better ear at 552,558 0-9 0.133 birth
0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz prevalence4
USA Atlanta (36) 1991-93 40+ dBHL better ear at 255,742 3-10 0.11
0.5, 1, 2 kHz
USA NHANES II (37) 1982-1984 31+ dB HL better ear 7,888 6-19
and Hispanic African-Am. 0.78
HANES Cuban Am. 1.21
Mexican Am. 0.60
White, non-H.
0.38
USA NHANES III (38) 1988-94 16+, 26+ dB HL at 0.5, 6,166 6-19 0.7 (16+)
1, 2 kHz better ear 0.4 (26+)
Developing Review (34) Review 41+ dBHL better ear Childhood 0.2-0.42
Thailand Bangkok (31) ? 41+ dBHL better ear 10,242 School age 3.9
schools 2,153 Children 6.1
Rural schools
Sierra Leone Panguma (39) 1992 26+, 41+, 61+ dBHL 2,015 5-15 2.58 (26-40)
better ear 0.65 (41-60)
0.50 (61+)
Angola Luanda (40) 1992? 31+ dBHL better ear at 1,030 Schoolchildren 2.0
.5, 1, 2 kHz
Zimbabwe (41) 1970s 31+ dBHL better ear 885 Schoolchildren 3.3
Kenya Kiambu (42) 1990? 31+ dBHL better ear at 5,368 Primary 2.2
district 2 & 4 kHz school age
Tanzania Northern (43) 31+ dBHL either ear at 854 Primary 3.0
inland district .5, 1, 2 kHz school age
Severe/profound 0.35
South Poor rural (44) 1990? 21+, 31+, 41+ dBHL 401 6-13 2.0 (31+)
Africa district in better ear 0.5 (41+)
Western Cape
Swaziland 1st year (44)
school-
children
Saudi Riyadh (45) 1997 20+dBHL, Air cond at 6421 2m – 12y 7.7
Arabia .25-.8kHz & .5-4kHz
bone cond, unilateral or
better ear bilateral
4 This figure refers to what the authors call “permanent childhood hearing impairment”– that is
sensorineural hearing loss and includes 16% who had post-natally acquired loss. The prevalence rate
for congenital hearing impairments was 0.112%. The figures are not directly comparable with data from
the WHO studies which include conductive loss.
China (1) 4.0 2.8 1.3 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Korea (8) 15.5 2.8 0.3 0.2 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.0
India
Vellore (1) 7.6 4.4 2.5 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0
Vellore 2 (1) 8.0 1.5 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lucknow Urban (9) 9.8 6.2 3.1 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.0
Lucknow Rural (9) 7.3 5.6 3.5 2.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Nepal (10) 15.3 8.7 4.5 2.5 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.0
Oman (11) 11.2 6.2 3.0 1.5 1.1 1.1
Indonesia (1) 7.1 1.4 0.1 1.5 1.0 1.0
Myanmar (1) 8.6 2.7 0.0 1.2 1.0 1.0
SriLanka (1) 21.7 10.0 3.4 0.5 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0
Thailand (12) 11.6 2.9 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.1
Nigeria (1) 4.5 1.1
Notes:
(1) Overall sex ratio at each threshold assumed to apply for each age group.
(2) Odds ratio for measured and self -reported hearing loss by sex 1.0; but around 2 for noise exposure which is greater in manual
occupations - so possibly a male excess. UK sex ratios used as proxy.
(3) Prevalences for missing age groups estimated using Finnish and Australian age patterns.
(5) Prevalences extrapolated to all ages 15+ using UK age patterns and sex ratio of 1.56. Prevalence ratio of 26+/41+ assumed to be the
same as in the Beaver Dam study.
(6) Prevalences extrapolated to all ages 15+ using Australian age patterns.
(7) Prevalence estimates based on sample-weighted average of prevalences for Mexican and Cuban born Americans. Prevalence of hearing
impairment in better ear estimated using ratio for better ear to worse ear from Beaver Dam study. Prevalence adjusted for exclus ion of
4kHz frequency using data from the Framingham study.
(8) Chinese aetiology data from Liu et al. found that presbyacusis was 54% of non-infectious causes. Reported prevalences for
presbyacusis adjusted upwards accordingly.
(9) Assumed same proportion bilateral as in rural study: For 15+ dBHTL, 74.3% had bilateral deafness. Unilateral tended to be mild deafness.
In the rural study, for unilateral deafness, 96% mild-moderate, while 90% for those with bilateral deafness
(11) Prevalences adjusted for difference in prevalence for 1,2,3 and 0.5,1,2,4 kHz using data from Duijvestijn et al 1999
(12) No age distributions given in Thai study. Age pattern based on average for 4 SEARO countries (Sri Lanka, India, Indonesia, Myanmar).
Korea
Italy
Denmark
Finland
AUS
USA NHANES1
BeaverDam
Hispanic
China
Korea
India (Vellore)
India (Vellore 2)
Nepal
OMAN
Indonesia
Myanmar
SriLanka
Thailand
Nigeria
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Age-standardised prevalence (%) at 41+ dBHLT
Italy
Denmark
Finland
AUS
USA NHANES1
BeaverDam
Hispanic
China
Korea
India (Vellore)
India (Vellore 2)
Nepal
Indonesia
Myanmar
SriLanka
Thailand
Hispanic
USA NHANES1
Denmark
AUS
China
China
India (Lucknow Rural
India (Lucknow Urban)
India (Vellore 2)
India (Vellore)
OMAN
Myanmar
SriLanka
Thailand
Nepal
Indonesia
Korea
Nigeria
Years lived with disability (YLDs) were calculated for the boxes shaded in grey.
Available treatment includes hearing aids, cochlear implants, and lip reading. Cochlear implants5 are
used by people with severe and profound hearing impairments who obtain negligible benefit from
hearing aids. While cochlear implants result in remission from hearing loss, the use of these is
negligible at the population level, and we assume a remission rate of zero. The effect of hearing aid
use is modelled as a reduction in the severity of hearing loss, and hence a lower disability weight.
YLD for hearing loss are calculated from estimated incidence, average duration and disability weight
(1). Disability weights for hearing loss used in the GBD 1990 study (1) and the Netherlands disability
weights study (47) are shown in Table 4.1. The Australian Burden of Disease study (48) used
modified Dutch weights together with Australian survey information on severity distribution in the
population. The resulting average disability weight is shown in the last column of Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 Disability weights for adult-onset hearing loss
The global coverage of hearing aid use has been estimated to be no more than 10%, skewed
towards developed countries (49). Less than 1% of hearing impaired individuals use hearing aids in
developing countries, while in developed countries the rate ranges from 10% to 40% (see Section 5
below). It is thus important to take into account the average prevalence of hearing aid use by region
in calculating the average disability weight for hearing loss. Little information is available on the
impact of hearing aid use on hearing disability. We provisionally assume that hearing aid use reduces
the disability weight to the next lower severity level as shown in Table 4.2. While we give zero
Disability
Stage/sequela weight Comment
Table 5.2 Estimated regional prevalence of hearing aid use among those with hearing loss, by severity level, age
and sex, GBD 2000 (Version 3)
Severity Other
(dBHTL) AMRO A AMRO B AMRO D EURO A EURO B1 EUR B2 EUR C WPRA regions
41-60 Male
15-29 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0
30-44 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 20 0
45-59 20 3 3 10 10 3 3 30 0
60-69 20 3 3 10 10 3 3 30 0
70-79 20 3 3 10 10 3 3 30 0
Female
15-29 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 0
30-44 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 10 0
45-59 20 3 3 10 10 3 3 20 0
Table 5.3 Estimated average disability weight for ages 15+, by subregion and sex
Table 6.1 Data and assumptions used to estimate regional prevalence rates for child-onset hearing loss
AFRO D and E From Nigeria study. Prevalences for 26+ dB assumed similar to SEARO D
AMRO A Based on prevalences estimated for WPRO A and NHANES III data
AMRO B and D Based on prevalences estimated for WPRO A, NHANES III and HHANES
EMRO B and D Prevalences from Oman study. For 81+ dB, assume similar to other regions
EURO A Based on study prevalences, plus other studies of congenital deafness and
childhood deafness
EURO B1 and C Assumed the same as Euro A
EURO B2 Based on average of prevalences for Euro B1 and Emro B
SEARO B Average for India, Indonesia and Vietnam. Prevalences for 26+ dBHTL based on
application of India ratios 26+/41+to average for 41+ from the three studies
SEARO D Based on India (Vellore 2). Prevalences for 26+ dBHTL based on average of India
(urban) and India (rural) ratios of 26+/41+ applied to 41+ prevalences
WPRO A Based on Australian study
WPRO B1 Weighted average of China, Korea and Vietnam data. Inclusion of Vietnam to
represent southern and rural areas of China.
The resulting overall global prevalences of hearing loss at various threshold levels are shown below in
Table 6.3. There are an estimated 588 million persons (including children) with mild or greater
hearing loss globally, an estimated 248 million with moderate or greater hearing loss, and 53 million
with severe or profound hearing loss. Figure 6.1 shows the resulting regional prevalences for
moderate or greater hearing loss and the age-specific prevalence rates by regional groupings.
Table 6.3 Estimated global prevalence of hearing loss, GBD 2000 (Version 2)
Child-onset 89 86 175
Moderate or
greater (41+)
Adult-onset 94 93 187
Child-onset 31 31 61
Severe or
greater (61+)
Adult-onset 21 25 46
Total 24 29 53
Profound (81+)
Adult-onset 3 5 8
Child-onset 3 3 6
Total 6 8 14
AFRO D - 1 AFRO D - 1
AFRO E - 2 AFRO E - 2
AMRO A - 3 AMRO A - 3
AMRO B - 4 AMRO B - 4
AMRO D - 5 AMRO D - 5
EMRO B - 6 EMRO B - 6
EMRO D - 7 EMRO D - 7
EURO A - 8 EURO A - 8
EURO B1 - 9 EURO B1 - 9
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000
70000 60000
A Regions Males A Regions
Females
AMRO BD AMRO BD
60000
50000 EURO BC
EURO BC
EMRO EMRO
50000 SEARO
SEARO
40000 WPRO B
Prevalence/100,000
WPRO B
Prevalence/100,000
30000
30000
20000
20000
10000 10000
0
0
0-4 5-14 15-29 30-44 45-59 60-69 70-79 80+
0-4 5-14 15-29 30-44 45-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age groups Age groups
Figure 6.1. Estimated adult-onset hearing loss prevalence rates, 41+ dBHTL, by region and sex, GBD 2000
Version 2.
Table 7.1. Adult-onset hearing loss: YLD, YLL and DALY estimates by subregion, 2000.
8. Conclusions
These are version 3 estimates for the GBD 2000 as published in the World Health Report 2003.
Apart from uncertainty analysis, updating estimates to reflect revisions of mortality estimates and any
new or revised epidemiological data or evidence, it is not intended to undertake any major addition
revision of these estimates.
We welcome comments and criticisms of these draft estimates, and information on additional sources
of data and evidence.
World
OAI - SEARB+WPRB2/3
CHI - WPRO B1
IND - SEARO D
EME - A regions
World
GBD 2000
MEC - EMRO B+D
GBD 1990
LAC - AMRO B+D
OAI - SEARB+WPRB2/3
CHI - WPRO B1
IND - SEARO D
EME - A regions
Figure 7.1. Adult-onset hearing loss YLD rates, by sex, broad regions, 1990 and 2000.
GBD 1990
12.00
GBD 2000
10.00
YLD/1000
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 7.2. Global adult-onset hearing loss YLD rates, by age and sex, 1990 and 2000.