Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 96 |Likes:
Published by outdash2

More info:

Published by: outdash2 on May 25, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Naso 5774
Download thousands of audio shiurim and articles at www.yutorah.org 
The Marcos and Adina Katz
Naso 5774
ying Tings ogether
Rabbi Shmuel Goldin
arsha Naso, he larges single parsha in he orah, is also one o he mos ragmened. Cenral o he parsha is a secion consising o disparae legal hemes, including:1. Te emporary exile o individuals affliced wih specific orms o uma rom various secions o he camp2. Laws concerning hef and alse denial o financial obligaion3. Te regulaions governing a Soa, a married woman suspeced o adulery 4. Te laws o a Nazir, an individual who vows o underake more rigorous religious observance5. Te rules o Birka Kohanim, he priesly blessing
 Wha, i any, uniying hread connecs he seemingly disparae laws ound in Parsha Naso? Why are hese regulaions specifically commanded now, as he Israelies prepare or heir monumenal deparure rom Moun Sinai?
 Approaches A:
 While, a firs glance, a global heme uniing all o Parsha Nasos laws remains elusive, connecions beween specific secions o he ex are suggesed by radiional sources.Te almud, or example, noes ha he laws concerning hef close wih an admoniion o respec he legal righs o he Kohanim. Immediaely hereafer he ex records he regulaions governing a Soa. Inerpreing his exual flow midrashically in “cause and effec” ashion, he rabbis proclaim ha anyone who holds back he porions mean or a Kohen will be punished wih amily srie and will ulimaely require he services o a Kohen a he riual rial o his suspeced wie.Te almud likewise explains he posiioning o he laws o neziru immediaely ollowing he regulaions governing a Soa. Te irresponsible, licenious behavior ha can be caused by inoxicaion is sarkly highlighed  by he specacle o he Soa. “Anyone who personally  winesses he degradaion experienced by a Soa,” he rabbis mainain, “will be moved o separae himsel [like a Nazir] rom wine.”Numerous commenaries address he poenial link  beween he exual secion concerning neziru and he secion immediaely ollowing, delineaing he laws o Birka Kohanim. Te Ibn Ezra simply saes ha afer discussing he Nazir, an individual o sancified saus, he orah urns is atenion o anoher sancified group, he Kohanim. Te Abravanel and, cenuries laer, he Alshich, mainain ha he exual message srikes deeper. Te pah owards sanciy need no be inheried, as in he case o he kehuna, bu can be earned, as in he case o neziru (see  Vayikra: zav 2). Adding our voice o he mix, a analizing addiional approach can be suggesed o explain he flow beween he regulaions o neziru and he laws o Birka Kohanim. Perhaps he orah means o highligh he criical overall similariies and disincions beween he caegories o neziru and kehuna.On he one hand, boh he Nazir and he Kohen are  bound by srikingly similar rules. Each, o a varying exen, is commanded o rerain rom conac wih deah, and each, again o a varying exen, is governed by regulaions concerning he consumpion o wine (see Vayikra: Shmini 2 or an analysis o he exual passage resricing he Kohen’s consumpion o inoxicaing beverages).
Naso 5774
Download thousands of audio shiurim and articles at www.yutorah.org 
On he oher hand, hese wo spiriual caegories rise rom conrasing origins.Te Nazir is moivaed by a desire o separae, o move away rom he surrounding sociey (see Naso 3 or a uller discussion o neziru). His religious search is inherenly isolaing.Te Kohen, in conras, gains his spiriual power specifically rom connecion o he communiy. One canno, afer all, be a pries wihou consiuens,  wihou hose who are dependen upon his services as a represenaive beore God. Tere can be no kehuna in isolaion.More han any oher riual associaed wih he kehuna, he Priesly Blessing underscores his undamenal connecion beween pries and communiy. By commanding he Kohen o bless he naion on God’s  behal muliple imes daily, he orah lierally orces each pries o regularly and direcly conron he rue source o his own sanciy: he people hemselves. Te Kohen’s kedusha emanaes ou o his role as a represenaive o he naion beore God. Absen he people, here would simply  be no need or he Kohen.No by coincidence, hereore, he orah places he laws o Birka Kohanim direcly afer he regulaions governing neziru. In sharp conras o wha many see as he flawed, isolaing religious atiude o he Nazir, he Kohen mus always recognize ha his role ress upon his connecion o – and his need or – he people.
Numerous oher commenaries sruggle o discern addiional hemaic and even linguisic associaions  beween he various legal passages o Parsha Naso. As insrucive as hese and oher links may be, however, hey ail o answer he wo global quesions raised a he  beginning o our sudy.On he level o psha, is here one uniying hread ha somehow connecs all o he laws o his secion o Parsha Naso? Will he discovery o his uniying hread help us undersand why hese laws are commanded specifically a his pivoal momen in ime, as he preparaions or he naions momenous journey rom Sinai near heir end?
 An approach o hese issues can perhaps be suggesed  by reflecing on he overall placemen o Parsha Naso isel in he ex.Unil his poin, he narraive o Seer Bamidbar has ocused mainly upon he physical srucure o he Israelie encampmen in he deser and upon he place o each amily and ribe wihin ha camp. Now, however, he orah urns is atenion o he harmony mean o reign  wihin he camp’s boundaries.Trough a series o sharp legal srokes, he ex addresses poenial sources o spiriual and social disrupion, oulining he response o each. While each o he examples cied by he orah is case specific, hey are mean o serve as paradigms as well. Te ex hus purposely addresses, as he naion’s journey is abou o begin, a series o lie arenas  wihin which peace and harmony mus be coninually and assiduously culivaed:1. Spiriual disrupion will be addressed hrough he emporary expulsion o individuals affliced wih specific orms o uma rom various secions o he camp. Only once hese individuals have regained he saus o ahara can hey reurn o ull uncioning  wihin Israelie sociey (see Vayikra: azria-Mezora 1–3 or discussions concerning he conceps o uma and ahara, riual impuriy and puriy).2. Te social abric o he camp will be preserved hrough adherence o he laws prohibiing hef and dishonesy.3. Te srucure o he amily – criical ye a imes ragile – will be addressed hrough he laws o Soa (see Naso 2 or a discussion as o how hese laws are designed o help salvage a amily in exremis, suffering rom he devasaing orces o suspicion and jealousy).4. Te poenially divisive desires o hose wishing o move beyond he religious norm will be addressed and conrolled hrough he laws o neziru.5. Finally, his enire secion o ex concludes wih he laws o Birka Kohanim, a blessing ha culminaes in he prayer or God’s mos precious gif o shalom, peace.Trough he inerplay o law and prayer, he orah hus communicaes ha rue peace wihin he Israelie encampmen will be dependen boh upon he naion’s conscious effors and upon God’s coninuing blessings.
Naso 5774
Download thousands of audio shiurim and articles at www.yutorah.org 
Te Uniqueness of Each Nasi’s Korban
Rabbi Shlomo Drillman z”lWriten by Rabbi Benjamin Kelsen based on a shiur fom Rabbi Drillman z”l
amidbar 7:1-3: “
 I came o pass, on he day Moshe  finished erecing he Mishkan, and he anoined i and consecraed i and all o is uensils, and he Alar and all is uensils, and he anoined hem and consecraed hem. Te leaders o Israel brough, [hose who were] he heads o heir ahers’ houses; hey were he leaders o he ribes, hey sood by during he couning. Tey brough heir offerings...” 
One o he main occurrences in Parshas Naso is ha o he Chanukkas HaMizbeach, he consecraion o he alar, in he Mishkan. Wha is mos ineresing abou he way in which his even is relaed is ha even hough he Nasi, leader, o each o he ribes brough an idenical sacrifice o commemorae he hisoric occasion, he orah repeas each and every one o he deails o each offering. Why was i necessary or he orah o repea he specifics o each korban? Would i no have been enough o say ha each Nasi brough he same offering, o wha he offering was comprised, and which Nasi brough his offering on which day o he esiviies? Furhermore, should we accep ha here is a reason or he orah having done so, we mus sill ask why he orah summarizes he oal number o he sacrifices ha were brough during he consecraion period a he end o he Parsha?Te Ramban offers us wo answers or our quesions.  According o he Ramban, he orah waned o besow honor upon each Nasi and his respecive Sheive by appoining a specific day or each ribe o bring is gif o he Mishkan. Since i was an impossibiliy or each Nasi o  be he firs o offer his korban, each was honored insead  wih his own day o bring his ribes’ offering. Te second reason ha he orah liss each and every offering, says he Ramban, is ha each Nasi, simulaneously and ye sill on heir own, decided o bring he same sacrifice in honor o he consecraion. Te Ribbono Shel Olam agreed, k’vayachol, wih his idea. Similar cases can be ound in several places wihin he orah. One such example is ha o he episode o he daughers o zlochad rom which  we learn ha a daugher inheris he propery o her aher should here be any male offspring. Anoher example is ha o he mizvah o Pesach Sheini.However, while he physical sacrifice may have been idenical, according o he Ramban each leader had a differen Hashkafic approach o his sacrifice. Examples o his concep are ha o Sheive Yehudah which brough heir korban wih noions o Malchus in mind, Sheive Zevulun which sough financial success, and Sheive  Yissochar which prayed o he Ribbono Shel Olam or success in he learning o orah. Tough ouwardly i  would appear ha each Nasi brough he same offering on behal o his people we find ha he Korban Sheb’lev, a closer look a he inernal perspecive and approach associaed wih each offering reveals ha each Korban was, in ac, unique in is own way.I one examines oher insances o korbanos being  brough in he orah one would find ha he name o HKB”H usually associaed wih sacrifices is he eragrammaon as opposed o “Elokim” which is he name  which is associaed wih he divine atribue o jusice, he Middas HaDin. Uilizing a sric applicaion o he concep o he Midas HaDin, i would appear ha Man should have o offer himsel as aonemen or his sins. Only due o he implemenaion o he Middas HaChessed v’HaRachamim, he divine atribue o Kindness and Mercy, is Man able o aone or his sins by bringing an animal in his place. An example o his concep in ound in he parsha o Akeidas  Yizchok when HKB”H ells Avraham Avinu o bring  Yizchok as a sacrifice. Jus as Avraham is abou o ake his son’s lie, HKB”H appears o Avraham wih he name Elokim, connoing Middas HaDin. Only afer Avraham shows his readiness o give up his son as a demonsraion o his commimen o HKB”H, does he Ribbono Shel Olam call ou o Avraham, using he name ha denoes he Middas HaChessed v’Rachamim. According o Chazal he passuk “Adam ki yakriv mikem...” means ha Man mus be prepared o sacrifice himsel as required by Middas HaDin. I is only hrough he Midas Hachesed o HKB”H ha man may subsiue a differen offering in his place o his own lie.Te Kavanah HaLev associaed wih a person’s sacrifice is ranserred o his subsiue Korban making i unique and ruly his own. In he Midbar, each Sheive had a separae ideniy wih unique alens and srenghs symbolized by he unique device depiced upon heir flag and he color associaed wih each ribe. ogeher, he

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->