ON CLARIFYING APPLICATIONS OF OUR IC75-2R8 SOCIAL-POLITICAL EXPERIMENT

OPENING PREMISE: I'm getting keen interest in this venture by making claims that i know are right
and as expected and as in, i've been experiencing scepticism all along; they say can you put that in
writing; which i have, and with this writing and my present situation, they're now saying 'way to go' and
'so can you get something in writing from them now. As i see it, we are in a ongley loophole situation
where, we're in a one on one situation of answering their !uestions where i explain the hoops, results
where they get it, but they still don't believe it's that easy.
"ow on this matter of asking, 'can you get something in writing from authority# I explain the catch$%%
situation that i placed authority in, in order to get this far, and they get it, when i asked to approve my
I&'($%)* ticket for example. A"+ this brings up the fact that the ticket attached in App$, is correctly
worded with wording that has proper syntax, for a I&'($%)*-,. application. /his said, we really have
no reason to argue over the ticket; it's legal as to form and content 0period1 Also when i file the I&'($
%)*-,, form for approval, please accept that it will be correct in form. As i see it, form$,. is for public
events, and form$,, is for handling transactions in 0our case1 a +ispensary 23A+!uarters, and form$
,% applies later, when 0not if1 some body takes this sales tax 4o, let's move on to the next step.
MAJOR POINT OF OUR PREMISE: 5hat we are pushing is a challenge to the fundamental values
expressed in the definition of the phrase '6ree and +emocratic 4ociety' 0+&7 under positive law, and
our goal is to shake the very foundation of what negative law did thru tort law that was deliberately
done in order to distort our &onstitution, which was easily achieved by distorting the definition of
words, and in so doing, right the wrong created by fixing a ma8or erroneous wrong in the law society
that actually has enslaved everyone, including themselves. and with this fundamental challenge of tort
law, we hope to create a ways and means out of these insane traps that tort law forces onto everyone.
I CAN EASILY SHOW THIS NOTION OF EXPRESSING FACT AS FICTION that tort law created9
A"+ what must be accepted is that if you accept this fiction as fact, this mindset becomes your reality
A"+ i can show you that the definition of a handful of key words changed our entire &onstitution up
side down, and in fact they did it better than 2itler, and because of this facade of distorted reality, we
live in a society that's sees it as legal, because that's the way it is, yet totally unlawful A"+ frankly tort
rulings created it all as perfectly legal, :3&A;43 the very function of tort law is the distort reason.
All kinds of legal experts will agree that the definition of all kinds of words, and 'key phrases' especially
in the +&, are actually what everyone agrees is what they perceive as the real set of values /2A/ we
all accept as their law society''s set of values, when we use any &harter right, in our defence;
MY CONTENTION IS THAT: the case law precedent$set case that uphold these definitions are 'cast
as the exact opposite' to this beautiful definition :3&A;43 tort law rulings chi<<led these rights away,
and then bent this rule, and twisted it to 'be' reality, when it actually is not, and 0the effect of it all1 is
that we all live in a big fat lie, and we want to believe it, so we contribute to and put up with misery in
the hope of a better tomorrow, and as =efferson warned9 we have become automatons of misery
THE FACT IS: the big print gave us all these rights and the small backroom print of tort rulings took it
all away, . /o show this, I chose the word1 >)34&)I:3+ :? A5, and they site this 0) v /herens1
case, as the case$law precedent. At face value, it's all good, 3@&3>/ every tort law application since
then, 0like1 the legal team for Aothers Against +runk +rivers 0AA++1 has abused this ruling so badly
that it's the genesis of why we have an overbearing >BI&3 4/A/3 on our roads, and ridiculous
bylaws to enforce road crimes that simply are not crimes. /he &harter was intentionally used to screw
we the people, :3&A;43 the case law precedent that some 'tort'ured 8udges used was designed to
screw us. :3&A;43 the case law they say is precedent has been twisted to the point where police
won a right to be tyrants under this 'special exemption' in 4ec C, as no$name -no badge law enforcer
under the ,CC* >olice Act, and because of tort 'law enforcers' must be able to do things 0break laws1
that we the people cannot do 0like1 torture peaceful protesters, who ob8ect to this corporate tyranny.
WHAT IM DOING IS CREATING A TRAP THAT TAKES DOWN TORT LAW o!" #$ %o& #''(
In my case, my defence is basic9 'tort law' twisted the definition of '>)34&)I:3+ :? A5' and a
'6)33 A"+ +3AB&)A/I& 4B&I3/? 0to name % specific words in our case1 to the point where if
anyone used them in a court of law would mean that we would have to be found guilty, because of all
the torture that's been done by negative law 0aka tort law1 on the original case law precedent
- In law, the BAR is supposed to rise, and in Law, the BAR is floating, and in LAW the BAR is sinking.
A) * )"" *+, *-. /0)1*2 +1" FACT THAT: As a &6B of DEA> that 'tort law simply has no authority to
distort our right to be governed and to govern ourselves under common law rules and practices, A"+
in fact, we are offering the only way left for anyone to defend that by saying "B under common law.
IN OUR CASE: &) and 3& both agree that the tort law that's been applied to ) v 4mith does
not prohibit me as a &6B from benefiting from cannabis edibles being legal 0for example1.
/herefor issuing tickets for cannabis cookies is legal, by conforming to I&'($%)* protocol.
I" 6A&/ this form is a vessel that offers a perfectly legally ways and means to
peacefully force positive law down authority's throat, thru +emocratic means
"B5, 0not if1 since tort on ) v 4mith does not apply to me, then the tort applied to ) v Bakes
clearly does not apply to me, and that means the tort applied against :oris 4t Aaurice does not
apply to me, because as &6B of a recogni<ed party, we can nullify this tortured right. A"+ all
the tort apply to >arker and 2it<ig +B "B/ A>>? /B A3 or anyone who belongs to the
Aari8uana >arty for that matter either, A"+ 523" 0not if1 the ordinary residents see the real
empowerment that's being offered will result in making the Aari8uana >arty the 'best suited'
>arty that could win a landslide ma8ority in the next 6ederal 3lection, on this issue of having
restored common law 8urisdiction to the people, once and for all. :3&A;43 it's understood
that any body that can attract the youth and the disenfranchised to vote will win by a landslide
3OTTOM LINE TO THIS ELECTION PLATFORM IS THAT: :y challenging ) v Bakes in this manner
will mark the course of events for this &entury. It actually is a process called 'civili<ation', and it 8ust
might be the last chance to undertake the burden of accepting a >ublic /rust &hallenge in order to
take the best and disregard the rest, in order to orderly undertake the makeover 0 A &ox ,CF*1
$ i firmly believe that 'there is a love that lies behind the walls of illusion that never speak the truth,
$ i'm driven, by a peculiarly sense that what i'm doing must be done and it's 'shame on me' if i shrink
from persevering with this one$word solution to this mess. I'm saying flat out that i'm challenging the
Grand daddy of all torts, "AA3?9 the torts placed on the Act of 4upremacy of ,((C -,(F% on the
founding principle of +emocracy itself "AA3?9 no one is above the law 0these torts don't apply to me1
$ it's impossible for any learned law expert to deny that my challenge of ) v Bakes will do exactly
what it says it's supposed to do 0impact society regardless of it's effect on society1 and it's supposed to
be undertaken in order to right a wrong 0regardless of how big1. A"+ it really is impossible for any
learned scolar to not accept that the solution to tort law distortion lies in the phrase 'no body is above
the law'. this leaflet explains it well, http9--www.scribd.com-doc-,%.,H,(*(-"o$:B+?$is$Above$the$aw
I-M CERTAIN THAT THIS IC75-2R8 %o&. is the ticket to do set this huge case law precedent, and the
worst the 4&& can say is '"B' $ All i'm doing is using a clever loophole that the architects of our
archetypal form called +emocracy set 0like =ohn ocke, ord :lackstone etc..1 they built into the
structure itself, the potential to fix the biggest flaw to +emocracy itself. A"+ I'm driven by a peculiarly
sense of urgency to press for 'a ?34', in the 4&&, because it's prescribed by law and their lore holds
dear that these =ustices must defend a 6ree and +emocratic society, without the application of tort, in
my case, because they are duty bound to uphold the 4upremacy of the law, when given a chance.
I dream :IG dreams, and it's said that even old men will have them too; it's actually an offer where the
eyes of the imaginer really will become our reality; it's called the Grand Awakening A"+ i wish you all
God's speed in figuring it out. /he key to your Golden Age resides in our heart, and all i'm doing is
preparing a path for this mindset called >aradise, in order to return the harmony of the lost accord. .
NOW 3ACK TO THE HERE AND NOW 3RASS TACKS OF IMPLEMENTING THIS TAX CREDIT(
I hear some very good !uestions that 3& brass can answer, tho $ I'll start with a brief preamble and
please answer the !uestion with A ?34 or "B response. 0after all tort law does not apply, right#1
,1 It seems like all kinds of professions and all kind of institutions use the phrase ' we can't help you,
because you're doing illegal activities' as their excuse to not serve our needs. 4o please answer this9
a. 5hile in election season, as a candidate, they are not doing a 'criminal activity', when that
shingle goes up :3&A;43 they are actually now doing a 'political activity'; that means professionals
like &hartered Accountants can now do the books for this candidate 0a yes or no1
ai. in fact &) cannot pursue any alleged criminal activity, on the premises, before this single goes
up, as long as this &ampaign electioneering is properly done on this new 36) program. 0a yes or no1
b. 5hile in this F months prior before any provincial election means, we 0our candidates1 can
campaign and use I&'($%)* protocol and forms to protect our Aari8uana >arty );:)I&, 0a yes or no1
c. In our case, this means that the day any of our candidate across &anada 0who also operate a
dispensary or grow$op1 can instantly make their premises their campaign 23A+!uarters, by simply
hanging a sign in their window saying 'Dote for me for this &ity Bffice' 0a yes or no1
ci. 5ith this caveat they can hang this sign after the F$month season is open A"+ if they do not
get on the ballot, before the poles close, means they must take the sign down. 0a yes or no1

d. 0this point is important for many candidates1 $ in the event that a candidate was signed up to
remit a G4/ or a 24/ or 64/ to &)., means they can walk away from remitting this tax, when they
hang this sign A4 B"G A4 they start remitting taxes thru their 3+A agent's 36). 0a yes or not1
di. &) cannot retaliate in any way against the old premises, while complying with 0d.1 0a yes or no1
dii. the AG or anyone under their employ cannot use the excuse of charging these candidates with
any criminal activity done, even if charges were pending, prior to this shingle going up. 0a yes or no1

%. /here are several :ands that want to cut to the chase by specifying how big the !uaram needs
to be, to vote on accepting such a sales tax 0like we are offering1 and what percentage of the ma8ority
voting must they get to pass this measure to answer this %$part !uestion can be done by addressing
i. /he percentage of the members at the &ouncil Aeeting must be, what9 IIIIIIIIIII
ii. /he percentage of vote needed to carry the acceptance of our offer, is what IIIIIIIIIIII
J. I'm sure there will be lots more !uestions to address in the near future, and due to the fact /hat
&) has no fax or email, means I can entrust 3& senior agents to communicate with )& &harities, and
a. )espect the opening premise and respond to the points KaL tru Kfi1 before you leave work on
6riday =une ,J
th, %.,H
. by email M increationwetrustMgmail.com
forwarded to the &ommisioner's office of 3lections &anada
/he referral series of !uestions need to be addressed on short leave and this burden in place to
respond onto the Assistance ;nit Aanager and the +eputy &hief 3lectoral Bfficer, >olitical 6inancing.
In order for it to be then sent to the &ommissioner of &anada 3lections, before any of you sign off for
the day "AA3? tomorrow =une ,J
th
%.,H. 0in other words by midnight tomorrow, our time <one1
/hank you $ marc boyer &6B of DEA>
email increationwetrustMgmail.com or call ''*$'.'$'HF,
#%+"& #'' 4" !# "5/"!+ )+&#*21+ %o&4#&$ #)4"&) +o )+&#*21+ %o&4#&$ 60")+*o), 41*'" +1*)
"'"!+*o *) 0$"& 4#7 - #$ o !o./'*#!" &"#''7 *) o+ # o/+*o) #+ +1*) +*."