Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Starbucks at West Coast Plaza, Singapore
Starbucks in zmir, Turkey
One Starbucks location in Hong Kong uses a retro Bing Sutt design.
Starbucks in Angeles City, Philippines
Starbucks in Mumbai, India
Starbucks in Lima, Peru
Starbucks in San Salvador, El Salvador
Starbucks in Beirut
Starbucks in formerOrange Daily Newsbuilding, Orange, California
Sign outside Starbucks location in Chinatown (Washington, D.C.)
Starbucks in Shunde District, China
Starbucks in Bonifacio Global City, Philippines
Starbucks in Canada
Starbucks in Australia
StarBucks Morocco Mall, Morocco
Former[edit]
In 2003, after struggling with fierce local competition, Starbucks closed all six of its locations
in Israel, citing "on-going operational challenges" and a "difficult business environment."
[88][89]
The Starbucks location in the former imperial palace in Beijing closed in July 2007. The coffee shop
had been a source of ongoing controversy since its opening in 2000 with protesters objecting that
the presence of the American chain in this location "was trampling on Chinese culture."
[90][91]
In July 2008, the company announced it was closing 600 under-performing company-owned stores
and cutting U.S. expansion plans amid growing economic uncertainty.
[92][93]
On July 29, 2008,
Starbucks also cut almost 1,000 non-retail jobs as part of its bid to re-energize the brand and boost
its profit. Of the new cuts, 550 of the positions were layoffs and the rest were unfilled jobs.
[94]
These
closings and layoffs effectively ended the company's period of growth and expansion that began in
the mid-1990s.
Starbucks also announced in July 2008 that it would close 61 of its 84 stores in Australia in the
following month.
[95]
Nick Wailes, an expert in strategic management of theUniversity of Sydney,
commented that "Starbucks failed to truly understand Australia's cafe culture.".
[96]
In May 2014
Starbucks announced ongoing losses in the Australian market which resulted in the remaining stores
being sold to the Withers Group
[97]
In January 2009, Starbucks announced the closure of an additional 300 under-performing stores and
the elimination of 7,000 positions. CEO Howard Schultz also announced that he had received board
approval to reduce his salary.
[98]
Altogether, from February 2008 to January 2009, Starbucks
terminated an estimated 18,400 U.S. jobs and began closing 977 stores worldwide.
[99]
In August 2009, Ahold announced closures and rebranding for 43 of their licensed store Starbucks
kiosks for their US based Stop & Shop and Giant supermarkets. However, Ahold has not yet
abandoned the licensed Starbucks concept; they plan to open 5 new licensed stores by the end of
2009.
[100][101]
In July 2012, the company announced that they may begin closing unprofitable European stores
immediately.
[102]
Unbranded stores[edit]
In 2009, at least three stores in Seattle were de-branded to remove the logo and brand name, and
remodel the stores as local coffee houses "inspired by Starbucks."
[103][104]
CEO Howard Schultz says
the unbranded stores are a "laboratory for Starbucks".
[105]
The first, 15th Avenue Coffee and Tea,
opened in July 2009 on Capitol Hill. It served wine and beer, and hosted live music and poetry
readings.
[106]
It has since been remodeled and reopened as a Starbucks-branded store. Another is
Roy Street Coffee and Tea at 700 Broadway E., also on Capitol Hill. Although the stores have been
called "stealth Starbucks"
[103][107]
and criticized as "local-washing",
[108]
Schultz says that "It wasn't so
much that we were trying to hide the brand, but trying to do things in those stores that we did not feel
were appropriate for Starbucks."
[105]
Automated locations[edit]
Starbucks has automated systems in some areas. These machines have 280 possible drink
combinations to choose from. They have touchscreens and customers can play a game while they
wait for their order.
[109]
Facilities[edit]
Starbucks in Dortmund, Germany
Free Wi-Fi Internet access varies in different regions. In Germany customers can get 2-hours of free
Wi-Fi through BT Openzone, and in Switzerland and Austria customers can get 30 minutes with a
voucher card (through T-Mobile).
Since 2003, Starbucks in the UK rolled out a paid Wi-Fi based on one-time, hourly or daily payment.
Then, in September 2009, it was changed to a 100% free Wi-Fi at most of its outlets. Customers with
a Starbucks Card are able to log-on to the Wi-Fi in-store for free with their card details, thereby
bringing the benefits of the loyalty program in-line with the United States.
[110]
Beginning in July 2010,
Starbucks offers free Wi-Fi in all of its US stores via AT&T and information through a partnership
with Yahoo!. This is an effort to be more competitive against local chains, which have long offered
free Wi-Fi, and against McDonald's, which began offering free wireless internet access in
2010.
[111]
On June 30, 2010, Starbucks announced it would begin to offer unlimited and free Internet
access via Wi-Fi to customers in all company-owned locations across Canada starting on July 1,
2010.
[112]
In October, 2012, Starbucks and Duracell Powermat announced a pilot program to install Powermat
charging surfaces in the tabletops in selected Starbucks stores in the Boston area.
[113]
Further more,
Starbucks announced its support in the PMA (Power Matters Alliance) and its membership in the
PMA board, along with Google and AT&T, in order to create a real-world ecosystem of wireless
power, by creating a universal standard for wireless charging, and to help the customers to recharge
their smart phones.
[114]
Advertising[edit]
200px
Starbucks sign in Naga City,Philippines
Starbucks at Ibn Battuta Mall, Dubai
The store in Insadong, Seoul, South Korea with Hangeul script sign
Starbucks Coffee () inXi'an, China
Starbucks coffee in Nicosia, Cyprus
Logo[edit]
In 2006, Valerie O'Neil, a Starbucks spokeswoman, said that the logo is an image of a "twin-tailed
mermaid, or siren as she's known in Greek mythology".
[115]
The logo has been significantly
streamlined over the years. In the first version, which was based on a 16th-century
"Norse"woodcut,
[116]
the Starbucks siren was topless and had a fully visible double fish tail.
[117]
The
image also had a rough visual texture and has been likened to a melusine.
[118]
In the second version,
which was used from 198792, her breasts were covered by her flowing hair, but hernavel was still
visible. The fish tail was cropped slightly, and the primary color was changed from brown to green, a
nod to the Alma Mater of the three founders, the University of San Francisco.
[119][120]
In the third
version, used between 1992 and 2011, her navel and breasts are not visible at all, and only vestiges
remain of the fish tails. The original "woodcut" logo has been moved to the Starbucks' Headquarters
in Seattle.
At the beginning of September 2006 and then again in early 2008, Starbucks temporarily
reintroduced its original brown logo on paper hot-drink cups. Starbucks has stated that this was done
to show the company's heritage from the Pacific Northwest and to celebrate 35 years of business.
The vintage logo sparked some controversy due in part to the siren's bare breasts,
[121]
but the
temporary switch garnered little attention from the media. Starbucks had drawn similar criticism
when they reintroduced the vintage logo in 2006.
[122]
The logo was altered when Starbucks entered
the Saudi Arabian market in 2000 to remove the siren, leaving only her crown,
[123]
as reported in
a Pulitzer Prize-winning column by Colbert I. King in The Washington Post in 2002. The company
announced three months later that it would be using the international logo in Saudi Arabia.
[124]
In January 2011, Starbucks announced that they would make small changes to the company's logo,
removing the Starbucks wordmark around the siren, enlarging the siren image, and making it
green.
[125]
Original brown logo, used from 19711987.
Green logo used from 19922011, still being used as a secondary logo.
Redesigned logo used from 2011present.
Partnerships[edit]
Starbucks has agreed to a partnership with Apple to collaborate on selling music as part of the
"coffeehouse experience". In October 2006, Apple added a Starbucks Entertainment area to
the iTunes Store, selling music similar to that played in Starbucks stores. In September 2007 Apple
announced that customers would be able to browse the iTunes Store at Starbucks via Wi-Fi in the
USwith no requirement to login to the Wi-Fi networktargeted at iPhone, iPod touch, iPad,
and MacBookusers. The iTunes Store will automatically detect recent songs playing in a Starbucks
and offer users the opportunity to download the tracks. Some stores feature LCD screens with the
artist name, song, and album information of the current song playing. This feature has been rolled
out in Seattle, New York City, and the San Francisco Bay Area, and was offered in limited markets
during 20072008.
[126]
During the fall of 2007, Starbucks also began to sell digital downloads of
certain albums through iTunes. Starbucks gave away 37 different songs for free download through
iTunes as part of the "Song of the Day" promotion in 2007, and a "Pick of the Week" card is now
available at Starbucks for a free song download. Since 2011 Starbucks also gives away a "Pick of
the Week" card for app downloads from the App Store. A Starbucks app is available in the
iPhone App Store.
Starting on June 1, 2009, the MSNBC morning news program Morning Joe has been presented as
"brewed by Starbucks" and the show's logo changed to include the company logo. Although the
hosts have previously consumed Starbucks coffee on air "for free" in the words of MSNBC
president Phil Griffin, it was not paid placement at that time.
[127]
The move was met with mixed
reactions from rival news organizations, viewed as both a clever partnership in an economic
downturn and a compromise of journalistic standards.
[128]
Starbucks and Kraft Foods entered into a partnership in 1998 to sell Starbucks products in the
Mondelez grocery stores owned by the latter. Starbucks claimed that Kraft did not sufficiently
promote its products and offered Kraft US$750 million to terminate the agreement; however, Kraft
declined the offer, but Starbucks proceeded with the termination anyway. Starbucks wanted to
terminate the agreement because at the time, single coffee packs were beginning to become
popular. In their agreement, Starbucks was confined to selling packs that only worked in Kraft's
Tassimo machines. Starbucks didn't want to fall behind in the market opportunities for k cups.
[129]
In
mid-November 2013, an arbitrator awarded ordered Starbucks to pay a fine of US$2.8 billion to
Kraft spin-off Mondelez International for its premature unilateral termination of the
agreement.
[130][131][132]
In June 2014, Starbucks announced a new partnership with Arizona State University(ASU) that
would allow Starbucks employees to complete four years of college at Arizona State University's
online program for only around 23K. Starbucks employees admitted into the program will receive a
scholarship from the college that will cover 22% of their freshman and sophomore year's tuition. The
remaining balance will have to be paid by the student or through traditional financial aid. During their
junior and senior years, employees receive a 44% scholarship from ASU and then pay the rest
through student loans which Starbucks pays off after students complete each semester.
[133]
Parodies and infringements[edit]
Starbucks has been a target of parodies and imitations of its logo, and has used legal action against
those it perceives to be infringing on its intellectual property. In 2000, San
Francisco cartoonist Kieron Dwyer was sued by Starbucks for copyright and trademark infringement
after creating a parody of its siren logo and putting it on the cover of one of his comics; later placing
it on coffee mugs, t-shirts, and stickers that he sold on his website and at comic book conventions.
Dwyer felt that since his work was a parody it was protected by his right to free speech under U.S.
law. The case was eventually settled out of court, as Dwyer claimed he did not have the financial
ability to endure a trial case with Starbucks. The judge agreed that Dwyer's work was a parody and
thus enjoyed constitutional protection; however, he was forbidden from financially "profiting" from
using a "confusingly similar" image of the Starbucks siren logo. Dwyer was allowed to display the
image as an expression of free speech, but he can no longer sell it.
[134]
In a similar case, a New York
store selling stickers and T-shirts using the Starbucks logo with the phrase "Fuck Off" was sued by
the company in 1999.
[135][136]
An anti-Starbucks website, starbuckscoffee.co.uk, which encouraged
people to deface the Starbucks logo
[137]
was transferred to Starbucks in 2005,
[138][139]
but has since
resurfaced at www.starbuckscoffee.org.uk. Christian bookstores and websites in the US are selling a
T-shirt featuring a logo with the siren replaced by Jesus and the words "Sacrificed for me" around
the edge.
[140]
Other successful cases filed by Starbucks include the case won in 2006 against the chain Xingbake
in Shanghai, China for trademark infringement, because the chain used a green-and-white logo with
a name that sounded phonetically similar to the Chinese for Starbucks.
[141]
Starbucks did not open
any stores after first registering its trademark in Russia in 1997 and in 2002 a Russian lawyer
successfully filed a request to cancel the trademark. He then registered the name with a Moscow
company and asked for $600,000 to sell the trademark to Starbucks, but was ruled against in
November 2005.
[35]
In 2003, Starbucks sent a cease-and-desist letter to "HaidaBucks Coffee House" in Masset, British
Columbia, Canada. The store was owned by a group of young Haida men, who claimed that the
name was a coincidence, due to "buck" being a Haida word for "young man" (a claim that cannot be
substantiated). After facing criticism, Starbucks dropped its demand after HaidaBucks dropped
"coffee house" from its name.
[142]
Sam Buck Lundberg, who owns a coffee store in Oregon, was
prohibited from using "Sambuck's Coffee" on the shop front in 2006.
[143]
In 2005 Starbucks lost a trademark infringement case against a smaller coffee vendor in South
Korea that operates coffee stations under the name Starpreya. The company, Elpreya, says
Starpreya is named after the Norse goddess, Freja, with the letters of that name changed to ease
pronunciation by Koreans. The court rejected Starbucks' claim that the logo of Starpreya is too
similar to their own logo.
[144]
A bar owner in Galveston, Texas, USA won the right to sell "Star Bock
Beer" after a lawsuit by Starbucks in 2003 after he registered the name, but the 2005 federal court
ruling also stated that the sale of the beer must be restricted to Galveston, a ruling upheld by the
Supreme Court in 2007.
[145]
"Rat City Rollergirls logo"
Ongoing cases include a dispute over the copyright application for Seattle's Rat City Rollergirls logo
in 2008
[146]
The company claimed the roller derby league's logo by a Washington artist
[147]
was too
similar to its own. Starbucks requested an extension to further examine the issue and possibly issue
a complaint, which was granted by the Trademark Office. The July 16, 2008 deadline passed without
action by the corporation.
[148]
Starbucks launched action against an Indian cosmetics business run by Shahnaz Husain, after she
applied to register the name Starstruck for use with coffee and related products. She said her aim
was to open a chain of stores selling coffee and chocolate-based cosmetics.
[149]
A cafe in Al-Manara
Square,
[150]
Ramallah, Palestine, opened in 2009 with the name "Stars and Bucks" and a logo using
a similar green circle and block lettering.
[151]
Like Starbucks, the Stars and Bucks serves
cappuccinos in ceramic cups, and offers free Wifi. According to speculation cited in the Seattle Post
Intelligencer, the cafe's name and imitation Starbucks style may be a political satire of American
consumerism. Starbucks is not known to have taken action against this business.
Others have used the Starbucks logo unaltered and without permission, such as a caf in Pakistan
that used the logo in 2003 in its advertisements
[152]
and a cafe in Cambodia in 2009, the owner
saying that "whatever we have done we have done within the law".
[153]
Environmental and social policies[edit]
Environmental impact[edit]
Grounds for your Garden
In 1999, Starbucks started "Grounds for your Garden" to make their business environmentally
friendlier. This gives leftover coffee grounds to anyone requesting it for composting. Although not all
stores and regions participate, customers can request and lobby their local store to begin the
practice.
In 2004, Starbucks began reducing the size of their paper napkins and store garbage bags, and
lightening their solid waste production by 816.5 t (1,800,000 lb).
[154]
In 2008, Starbucks was ranked
No.15 on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's list of Top 25 Green Power Partners for
purchases of renewable energy.
[155]
In October 2008, The Sun newspaper reported that Starbucks was wasting 23.4 million liters (6.2
million US gal) of water a day by leaving a tap constantly running for rinsing utensils in a 'dipper well'
in each of its stores,
[156]
but this is often required by governmental public health code.
[157]
In June 2009, in response to concerns over its excessive water consumption, Starbucks re-
evaluated its use of the dipper well system. In September 2009, company-operated Starbucks stores
in Canada & the United States successfully implemented a new water saving solution that meets
government health standards. Different types of milk are given a dedicated spoon that remains in the
pitcher and the dipper wells were replaced with push button metered faucets for rinsing. This will
reportedly save up to 150 US gal (570 l) of water per day in every store.
[158][not in citation given]
A bin overflowing with Starbucks cups
Recycling[edit]
Starbucks began using 10% recycled paper in its beverage cups in 2004the company claimed that
the initiative was the first time that recycled material had been used in a product that came into direct
contact with a food or beverage.
[159]
Allen Hershkowitz of the Natural Resources Defense
Council called the 10% content "minuscule,"
[159]
but Starbucks received the National Recycling
Coalition Recycling Works Award in 2005 for the initiative.
[160]
In a 2008 media article, Starbucks' vice president of corporate social responsibility acknowledged
that the company continued to struggle with environmental responsibility, as none of its cups were
recyclable and stores did not have recycling bins. At the time that the article was published,
Starbucks gave customers who brought in their own reusable cup a 10-cent discount, in addition to
using corrugated cup sleeves made from 85 percent post-consumer recycled fiber, which is 34
percent less paper than the original. During the same period, Starbucks entered into a partnership
with Conservation Internationalpledging US$7.5 million over three yearsto help protect the
natural environment of coffee-growing communities in Mexico and Indonesia.
[161]
Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) practices[edit]
Starbucks began drafting plans for corporate social responsibility in 1994.
[162]
Since, Starbucks has
partnered with Conservation International to draft plans and audit its Coffee and Farmer Equity
program.
[163]
Starbucks C.A.F.E. practices are based on a rating system of 249 indicators. Farmers
who earn high overall scores receive higher prices than those who achieve lower scores. Ratings
categories include: economic accountability, social responsibility, environmental leadership in coffee
growing and processing. Indicators for social responsibility have evolved and now include zero
tolerance indicators that require workers to be paid in cash, check, or direct deposit, ensure that all
workers are paid the established minimum wage, that workplaces are free of harassment and abuse,
that workplaces are nondiscriminatory and do not employ persons under the age of 14, and several
more.
[164]
Starbucks has moved 90% of its coffee purchases to preferred C.A.F.E. certified providers,
and the company is approaching its stated goal to purchase 100% of its coffee through C.A.F.E or
other 'ethically sourced' certification systems.
[163]
" Washington State University Assistant Professor
Daniel Jaffee argues that Starbucks' C.A.F.E. practices merely 'green wash' "to burnish their
corporate image."
[165]
Additionally, Professor Marie-Christine Renard of Rural Sociology of Chapingo
University in Mexico wrote a case study of Starbucks, Conservation Internationals(CI), and Agro-
industries United of Mexico (AMSA) joint conservation effort in Chiapas, Mexico in which she
concluded that [w]hile the CI-Starbucks-AMSA Alliance paid better prices, it did not allow the
producers to appropriate the knowledge that was necessary for the organizations to improve the
quality of their coffee.
[166]
Nevertheless, Starbucks' Corporate Social Responsibility plan has benefited the environment in
increasing biodiversity and quality shade in important biodiversity hotspots around the world. For
instance, in Jalapa, Guatemala, 69% of C.A.F.E. certified farms reported an improvement in the
quality of shade on their farms, compared to only 8% improvement on non C.A.F.E. certified
farms.
[167]
Fair trade[edit]
Starbucks coffee beans
In 2000, the company introduced a line of fair trade products.
[168]
Of the approximately 136,000
metric tons (300 million pounds) of coffee Starbucks purchased in 2006, only about 6% was certified
as fair trade.
[169]
According to Starbucks, they purchased 2,180 metric tons (4.8 million pounds) of Certified Fair
Trade coffee in fiscal year 2004 and 5,220 metric tons (11.5 million pounds) in 2005. They have
become the largest buyer of Certified Fair Trade coffee in North America (10% of the global
market). Transfair USA,
[170][broken citation]
a third-party certifier of Fair Trade Certified coffee in the
United States, has noted the impact Starbucks has made in the area of Fair Trade and coffee
farmer's lives:
Since launching its FTC coffee line in 2000, Starbucks has undeniably made a significant
contribution to family farmers through their rapidly growing FTC coffee volume. By offering FTC
coffee in thousands of stores, Starbucks has also given the FTC label greater visibility, helping to
raise consumer awareness in the process.
[attribution needed]
All espresso roast sold in the UK and Ireland is Fairtrade.
[171]
Questions have been raised regarding the legitimacy of the Fair Trade designation.
[172]
Groups such as Global Exchange are calling for Starbucks to further increase its sales of fair trade
coffees.
[173]
Beyond Fair Trade Certification, Starbucks argues that it pays above market prices for all of its
coffee.
[citation needed]
According to the company, in 2004 it paid on average $1.42 per pound ($2.64 kg)
for high-quality coffee beans, 74% above the commodity prices at the time.
[174]
After a long-running dispute between Starbucks and Ethiopia, Starbucks agreed to support and
promote Ethiopian coffees. An article in BBC NEWS,
[175]
states that Ethiopian ownership of popular
coffee designations such as Harrar and Sidamo is acknowledged even if they are not registered. The
main reason Ethiopia fought so hard for this acknowledgement was to allow its poverty-stricken
farmers a chance to make more money. Unfortunately, this has not been the case. In 2006
Starbucks says it paid $1.42 per pound for its coffee. At, the coffee Starbucks bought for $1.42 per
pound had a selling price, after transportation, processing, marketing, store rentals, taxes and staff
salary and benefits of $10.99 per pound.
[176]
As of August 2010, Starbucks sells only one Ethiopian
coffee on its website and it is proclaimed by the website to be new.
In addition, Starbucks is an active member of the World Cocoa Foundation.
Ethos water[edit]
Ethos, a brand of bottled water acquired by Starbucks in 2003, is sold at locations throughout North
America. Ethos bottles feature prominent labeling stating "helping children get clean water", referring
to the fact that $.05 from each $1.80 bottle sold ($.10 per bottle in Canada) is used to fund clean
water projects in under-developed areas. Although sales of Ethos water have raised over
$6,200,000 for clean water efforts, the brand is not incorporated as a charity. Critics have argued
that the claim on the label misleads consumers into thinking that Ethos is primarily a charitable
organization, when it is actually a for-profit brand and the vast majority of the sale price (97.2%)
does not support clean-water projects.
[177][178]
The founders of Ethos have stated that the brand is
intended to raise awareness of third-world clean water issues and provide socially responsible
consumers with an opportunity to support the cause by choosing Ethos over other
brands.
[179]
Starbucks has since redesigned the American version of the Ethos water bottles, stating
the amount of money donated per bottle in the description.
Controversy[edit]
This section's images may require adjustment of image
placement, formatting, and size. Please see the picture
tutorialand the image placement policy for further
information. (February 2013)
A local coffee shop in New York'sEast Village claiming it had to close because Starbucks is
willing to pay higher rent for the space
Market strategy[edit]
Starbucks footprint in the United States, showing saturation of metropolitan areas
Some of the methods Starbucks has used to expand and maintain their dominant market position,
including buying out competitors' leases, intentionally operating at a loss, and clustering several
locations in a small geographical area (i.e., saturating the market), have been labeled anti-
competitive by critics.
[180]
For example, Starbucks fueled its initial expansion into the UK market with
a buyout of Seattle Coffee Company, but then used its capital and influence to obtain prime
locations, some of which operated at a financial loss. Critics claimed this was an unfair attempt to
drive out small, independent competitors, who could not afford to pay inflated prices for premium real
estate.
[181]
While relations with independent coffeehouse chains have been strained, some owners have
credited Starbucks with educating customers on coffee.
[182]
Labor disputes[edit]
Baristas work inside the Seattle store at 1912 Pike Place.
Starbucks workers in seven stores have joined the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) as
theStarbucks Workers Union since 2004.
[183]
According to a Starbucks Union press release, since then the union membership has begun
expanding to Chicago and Maryland in addition to New York City, where the movement
originated.
[184][185]
On March 7, 2006, the IWW and Starbucks agreed to a National Labor Relations
Board settlement in which three Starbucks workers were granted almost US$2,000 in back wages
and two fired employees were offered reinstatement.
[186][187][188]
According to the Starbucks Union, on
November 24, 2006, IWW members picketed Starbucks locations in more than 50 cities around the
world in countries including Australia, Canada, Germany, and the UK, as well as U.S. cities including
New York, Chicago, Minneapolis and San Francisco,
[189]
to protest the firing of five Starbucks
Workers Union organizers by Starbucks and to demand their reinstatement.
The Reverend Billy leading an anti-Starbucks protest in Austin, Texas in 2007
Some Starbucks baristas in Canada,
[190]
Australia and New Zealand,
[191]
and the United
States
[192]
belong to a variety of unions.
In 2005, Starbucks paid out US$165,000 to eight employees at its Kent, Washington, roasting plant
to settle charges that they had been retaliated against for being pro-union. At the time, the plant
workers were represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers. Starbucks admitted no
wrongdoing in the settlement.
[183]
A Starbucks strike occurred in Auckland, New Zealand, on November 23, 2005.
[191]
Organized
by Unite Union, workers sought secure hours, aminimum wage of NZ$12 an hour, and the abolition
of youth rates. The company settled with the Union in 2006, resulting in pay increases, increased
security of hours, and an improvement in youth rates.
[193]
In March 2008, Starbucks was ordered to pay baristas over US$100 million in back tips in a
Californian class action lawsuit launched by baristas alleging that granting shift-supervisors a portion
of tips violates state labor laws. The company plans to appeal. Similarly, an 18-year-old barista in
Chestnut Hill, MA has filed another suit with regards to the tipping policy. Massachusetts law also
states that managers may not get a cut of tips.
[194][195]
A similar lawsuit was also filed in Minnesota on
March 27, 2008.
[196]
Opening without planning permission[edit]
Starbucks has been accused by local authorities of opening several stores in the UK in retail
premises, without the planning permission for a change of use to a restaurant. Starbucks has argued
that "Under current planning law, there is no official classification of coffee shops. Starbucks
therefore encounters the difficult scenario whereby local authorities interpret the guidance in different
ways. In some instances, coffee shops operate under A1 permission, some as mixed use A1/A3 and
some as A3".
[197]
In May 2008, a branch of Starbucks was completed on St. James's Street in Kemptown, Brighton,
England, despite having been refused permission by the local planning authority, Brighton and Hove
City Council, who claimed there were too many coffee shops already present on the
street.
[198][199]
Starbucks appealed the decision by claiming it was a retail store selling bags of coffee,
mugs and sandwiches, gaining a six month extension,
[200]
but the council ordered Starbucks to
remove all tables and chairs from the premises, to comply with planning regulations for a retail
shop.
[201]
2500 residents signed a petition against the store,
[202]
but after a public inquiry in June
2009 a government inspector gave permission for the store to remain.
[203]
A Starbucks in Hertford won its appeal in April 2009 after being open for over a year without
planning permission.
[204]
Two stores in Edinburgh,
[205]
one in Manchester,
[206]
one in Cardiff,
[207]
one
in Pinner and Harrow, were also opened without planning permission.
[197]
The Pinner cafe, opened in
2007, won an appeal to stay open in 2010.
[208]
One in Blackheath, Lewisham
[209]
was also under
investigation in 2002 for breach of its licence, operating as a restaurant when it only had a licence for
four seats and was limited to take away options. There was a considerable backlash from members
of the local community who opposed any large chains opening in what is a conservation area. To
this date, the Starbucks is still operating as a takeaway outlet.
Protests[edit]
There have been calls for boycott of Starbucks stores and products because it has been wrongly
claimed that Starbucks sends part of its profits to the Israeli military,
[210]
but such allegations are
based on a hoax letter attributed to the President, Chairman and CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz,
who is Jewish
[211]
and supports Israel's right to exist.
[212]
He is a recipient of several Israeli awards
including "The Israel 50th Anniversary Tribute Award" for "playing a key role in promoting a close
alliance between the United States and Israel."
[213]
The hoax letter claiming that Schultz had donated money to the Israeli military was actually written
by an Australian weblogger, Andrew Winkler, who has admitted fabricating the
document.
[212][214]
Starbucks responded to these claims, widely circulated on the internet, stating that
"Neither Chairman Howard Schultz nor Starbucks fund or support the Israeli Army. Starbucks is a
non-political organization and does not support individual political causes."
[213]
The protests against
Starbucks derived from the Winkler letter were not the first; earlier protests occurred in June 2002 in
Cairo, Dubai and Beirut universities in response to Schultz's criticism of Yasser Arafat.
[214]
Starbucks
has been a regular target of activists protesting against Israel's role in the Gaza War over the claims.
Organizations have urged a boycott of Starbucks, accusing Starbucks of serving as an ally of Israeli
militarists.
[215][216]
Starbucks was forced to close a store in Beirut, Lebanon due to demonstrators
shouting anti-Israel slogans and causing customers to flee.
[217]
Demonstrators hung several banners
on the shop's window and used white tape to paste aStar of David over the green-and-white
Starbucks sign. They also distributed a letter saying Schultz "is one of the pillars of the
American Jewish lobby and the owner of the Starbucks," which they said donates money to the
Israeli military.
[218]
A store on Piccadilly with its windows boarded up after being smashed by protesters
A damaged front window of a Starbucks coffee shop in Toronto
On January 2009, two Starbucks stores in London were the target of vandalism by pro-
Palestinian demonstrators who broke windows and reportedly ripped out fittings and equipment after
clashes with riot police.
[219][220][220][221][222][223][224]
"The Way I See It"[edit]
Quotes by artists, writers, scientists and others have appeared on Starbucks cups since 2005 in a
campaign called "The Way I See It".
[225]
Some of the quotes have caused controversy, including one
by writer Armistead Maupin and another by Jonathan Wells that linked 'Darwinism' to eugenics,
abortion and racism.
[226]
Disclaimers were added to the cups noting that these views were not
necessarily those of Starbucks.
[citation needed]
US military viral email[edit]
A US Marines Sergeant emailed ten of his friends in August 2004 having wrongly been told that
Starbucks had stopped supplying the military with coffee donations because the company did not
support the Iraq War. The email became viral, being sent to tens of millions of people. Starbucks and
the originator sent out a correction,
[227]
but Starbucks' VP of global communications, Valerie O'Neil,
said in September 2009 that the email was still being forwarded to her every few weeks.
[228][229][230]
Gun controversy[edit]
As gun laws in many US states have become more relaxed, and more states have adopted open
carry or concealed carry statutes, some gun owners have begun carrying guns while performing
every day shopping or other tasks. Many stores and companies have responded by banning the
carrying of guns on their premises, as allowed by many states local laws. Starbucks has not
instituted a policy banning guns in their stores.
In 2010, the Brady Campaign proposed a boycott of Starbucks due to their gun policy.
[231][232]
At that
time, Starbucks released a statement saying "We comply with local laws and statutes in all the
communities we serve. That means we abide by the laws that permit open carry in 43 U.S. states.
Where these laws don't exist, openly carrying weapons in our stores is prohibited. The political,
policy and legal debates around these issues belong in the legislatures and courts, not in our
stores."
[233][234]
In 2012, the National Gun Victims Action Council published an open letter to Starbucks, asking them
to revise their policy, and also proposed a "Brew not Bullets" boycott of the chain until the policy is
changed, with Valentine's Day selected as a particular day to boycott the chain.
[235][236][237]
In response, gun rights advocates started a counter "Starbucks Appreciation Day" buycott to support
Starbucks stance, and suggested paying for products using two-dollar billsas a sign of Second
Amendment support.
[238][239][240]
On July 29, 2013, the organization, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, initiated a
petition demanding a ban on guns in Starbucks stores.
[241]
On September 17, 2013, founder and CEO Howard Schultz asked customers to no longer bring
guns into its stores. He made the comments in an open letter on the company's website. Schultz
said he was not banning guns, but making a request.
[242]
Same-sex marriage[edit]
In January 2012, a Starbucks executive stated it supports the legalization of same-sex marriage.
This resulted in a boycott by the National Organization for Marriage, a political organization that
opposes same-sex marriage, who received 22,000 signatures in favor of their boycott.
[243]
In
response, CEO Howard Schultz had this to say: "If you feel, respectfully, that you can get a higher
return than the 38 percent you got last year, its a free country. You can sell your shares of
Starbucks and buy shares in another company. Thank you very much."
[244]
In addition, 640,000
people also signed a petition thanking Starbucks for its support.
[245]
European tax avoidance[edit]
In October 2012, Starbucks faced criticism after a Reuters investigation found that the company
reportedly paid only 8.6 million in corporation tax in the UK over 14 years, despite generating over
3 billion in salesthis included no tax payments on 1.3 billion of sales in the three years prior to
2012.
[246][247]
It is alleged that Starbucks was able to do this by charging high licencing fees to the UK
branch of the business, allowing them to declare a 33 million loss in 2011.
[248]
The UK subsidiary
pays patent fees to the USA subsidiary, purchases coffee beans from the Netherlands subsidiary
(where corporation tax is lower than in the UK), and uses the Swiss subsidiary for other
"miscellaneous services".
[249]
A YouGov survey suggested that Starbucks' brand image was
substantially weakened by the controversy surrounding how much tax it pays in the UK several
weeks after the allegations surfaced.
[250]
Starbucks' chief financial officer (CFO) appeared before the Public Accounts Committee in
November 2012 and admitted that the Dutch government granted a special tax rate to their
European headquarters, which the UK business pays royalties to.
[251]
Dutch law permits companies
to transfer royalties collected from other countries to tax havens without incurring taxes, unlike in the
rest of the EU.
[252]
The CFO denied that they chose the Netherlands as their European headquarters
to avoid tax, explaining that the company's Dutch coffee roasting plant was the reason for the
decision.
[251]
Until 2009, the royalty rate was 6% of UK sales, but after being challenged by UK tax
authorities it was reduced to 4.7%.
[252]
The CFO told the committee this reflected costs such as
designing new stores and products, but admitted that there was no detailed analysis by which the
rate is decided. The coffee they serve in the UK is purchased from the Swiss subsidiary, which
charges a 20% markup on the wholesale price and pays 12% corporation tax on profits.
[251]
Coffee is
not transported to Switzerland but the 30 people who work in the subsidiary assess coffee quality.
Regarding Starbucks' frequent reports of loss in the UK, the CFO told the committee that Starbucks
are "not at all pleased" about their financial performance in the UK.
[251]
MPs replied that it "just
doesn't ring true" that the business made a loss, pointing out that the head of the business had been
promoted to a new post in the USA and they consistently told shareholders that the business was
profitable.
[246][253]
In Ireland, Starbucks' subsidiary Ritea only paid 35,000 in tax between 2005 and 2011 and the
subsidiary recorded losses in every year other than 2011. Ritea is owned by Dutch-based Starbucks
Coffee Emea.
[254]
Their French and German subsidiaries make large losses because they are
heavily in debt to the Dutch subsidiary, which charges them higher interest rates than the group pays
to borrow. Reuters calculated that without paying interest on the loans and royalty fees, the French
and German subsidiaries would have paid 3.4 million in tax. The Dutch subsidiary that royalties are
paid to made a 507,000 profit in 2011 from revenues of 73 million, while the company that roasts
coffee made a profit of 2 million in 2011 and paid tax of 870,000.
[252]
Protesters, who were unimpressed by the company's offer to pay 20 million in tax over the next two
years, staged demonstrations in December 2012 in affiliation with UK Uncut.
[255]
In June 2014 the European Commission anti-trust regulator launched an investigation of the
company's tax practices in the Netherlands, as part of a wider probe of multi-national companies' tax
arrangements in various European countries.
[256]
Windfall profit in China[edit]
In October 2013, China Central Television reported about the windfall profit in Chinese Starbucks
Restaurants. The report said reporters compared Starbucks Latte (354 ml)'s price
in Beijing, Chicago, London and Bombay. The price in Beijing is highest and in Bombay is cheapest.
The reported also said, Latte costs only 4 Yuan (USD 0.67) but the sell price is 27 Yuan (USD 4.5),
so Starbucks's profit margin in China is higher than other countries.
[257][258]
Awards and honors[edit]
The firm was named by Fortune magazine as one of the top 100 companies to work for in 2013,
listing reasons that employees of the company were offered stock rewards for working 20
hours/week, and that "There is potential for anyone to move up the ladder."
[259]
Music, film, and television[edit]
Main article: Hear Music
Starbucks' second Hear Music Coffeehouse at the South Bank development adjacent to
the River Walkin downtown San Antonio, Texas.
Hear Music is the brand name of Starbucks' retail music concept. Hear Music began as a catalog
company in 1990, adding a few retail locations in the San Francisco Bay Area. Hear Music was
purchased by Starbucks in 1999. Nearly three years later, in 2002, they produced a Starbucks opera
album, featuring artists such as Luciano Pavarotti, followed in March 2007 by the hit CD "Memory
Almost Full" by Paul McCartney, making McCartney the first artist signed to New Hear Music Label
sold in Starbucks outlets. Its inaugural release was a big non-coffee event for Starbucks the first
quarter of 2007.
In 2006, the company created Starbucks Entertainment, one of the producers of the 2006
film Akeelah and the Bee. Retail stores heavily advertised the film before its release and sold the
DVD.
[260]
Parent company relationships[edit]
Starbucks maintains control of production processes by communicating with farmers to secure
beans, roasting its own beans, and managing distribution to all retail locations. Additionally,
Starbucks Coffee and Farmer Equity Practices require suppliers to inform Starbucks what portion of
wholesale prices paid reaches farmers.
[261][262]