Professional Documents
Culture Documents
|
.
|
\
|
+ |
.
|
\
|
d
h
N
d
a
V
f
u u
y
1
(PCI Eq. 4.6.3)
where
= 0.85
a = shear span, in., measured from load to center of
sh
A
h = depth of the member above the dap, in.
d = distance from top to center of the reinforcement
s
A , in.
y
f = yield strength of the flexural reinforcement, psi
From Fig. 2,
a = 4
1
/
8
in. + 1
1
/
2
in. +
1
/
2
6
/
8
= 6 in.
d = 12
3
/
8
in. + 3
1
/
8
in.
1
/
2
7
/
8
= 15.06 in.
a/d =
06 . 15
6
= 0.4 (since less than 1.0, OK)
h = 12
3
/
8
+ 3
1
/
8
+
3
/
8
= 15.875 in.
f
y
= 60 ksi
88 . 0 44 . 0 2 = =
vh
A in
2
N
u
= 0.2
u
V = 0.2( )
y vh
f A 85 . 0 = 0.2( ) 60 88 . 0 85 . 0 = 8.98 kips
A
s
= 0.6 in
2
s
A =
(
|
.
|
\
|
+ |
.
|
\
|
d
h
N
d
a
V
f
u u
y
1
0.60 =
(
|
.
|
\
|
+ |
.
|
\
|
06 . 15
875 . 15
98 . 8
06 . 15
6
60 85 . 0
1
u
V
14
V
u
= 53.05 kips
V
n
= 53.05/0.85 = 62.41 kips
Direct shear
s
A =
n
e y
u
A
f
V
+
3
2
(PCI Eq. 4.6.4)
n
A =
y
u
f
N
ksi
psi
V
V u
u
V
u
= 51.40 kips
15
V
n
= 51.40/0.85 = 60.47 kips
Check
1000 40 . 51
05 . 1 875 . 15 75 . 5 85 . 0 1000
=
e
=1.58 (since less than 3.4, OK)
Diagonal reinforcement at reentrant corner
y
u
sh
f
V
A
0.88 =
60 85 . 0
u
V
V
u
= 44.88 kips
V
n
= 44.88/0.85 = 52.8 kips Controls
Shear reinforcement in the extended end
c y h y v n
f bd f A f A V + + = 2 ( ) (PCI Eq. 4.6.8)
n
A =
y
u
f
N
\
|
+ + =
u
V kips
V
n
= 53.43/0.85 = 62.86 kips
Anchorage of reinforcement
According to ACI R12.2
For No. 6 bar
c
y
b
d
f
f
d
l
=
25
0 . 1 = , 0 . 1 = , 3 . 1 = , 60 =
y
f ksi, 6000 =
c
f psi, =
b
d
6
/
8
in
( )( )( )
21 . 30
8
6
6000 25
3 . 1 1 1 60000
= |
.
|
\
|
=
d
l in. (OK, 30 in. provided)
For No. 7 bar
17
c
y
b
d
f
f
d
l
=
20
0 . 1 = , 3 . 1 = , 3 . 1 = , 60 =
y
f ksi, 6000 =
c
f psi, =
b
d
7
/
8
in
( )( )( )
27 . 57
8
7
6000 20
3 . 1 1 3 . 1 60000
= |
.
|
\
|
=
d
l in. (OK, 60 in. provided)
18
List of Tables
Table 1. Concrete Properties
Table 2. Properties of Reinforcing Bars
Table 3. Properties of Mild Steel
Table 4. Summary of Calculations and Test Results
19
Table 1. Concrete Properties
Transfer Strength,
ci
f (psi)
3,095
Compressive Strength,
c
f (psi)
6,000
Modulus of Elasticity at Time of Initial Prestress,
ci
E (ksi)
2,264
Modulus of Elasticity,
c
E (ksi)
3,152
Note: 1 ksi = 1,000 psi = 6.89 MPa
Table 2. Properties of Reinforcing Bars
Strand Type
Low Relaxation
Strand Tensile Strength (ksi)
270
Nominal Diameter (in) 0.5
Strand Area (in
2
) 0.153
0.7
ps pu
A f (kip)
28.9
Modulus of Elasticity,
ps
E (ksi)
28,322
Note: 1 ksi = 6.89 MPa; 1 kip = 4.45 kN; 1 in = 25.4 mm
Table 3. Properties of Mild Steel
Modulus of Elasticity,
mild
E (ksi)
29,000
Yield Strength,
y
f (ksi)
60
Permissible Tensile Stress,
s
f (ksi)
30
Note: 1 ksi = 6.89 MPa
20
Table 4. Summary of Calculations and Test Results
Theoretical
*
Experimental
Code
Shear Span
(ft)
V
n(cal)
(kip)
V
cr
(kip)
V
test
(kip)
Failure Mode
SP I
8 52.80 28.22 45.68 Shear-Flexure
SP II
5 52.80 29.10 57.40 Shear-Flexure
Note: 1 kip = 4.45 kN; 1 ft = 0.3048m
Legend:
1) V
c
= shear resisted by the concrete
V
n(cal)
= calculated nominal shear capacity at reentrant corner
V
cr
= shear at first crack at the reentrant corner
V
test
= maximum shear at failure
2) There is no vertical component of prestress along each stem of tested
specimens, therefore V
P
= 0.
* Calculated shear strength of dapped end based on nominal yield strength of
reinforcing bars.
21
List of Figures
Fig. 1. Lay-Out of Prestressing Strands
Fig. 2. Layout of Mild Reinforcement
Fig. 3. Potential Failure Modes and Required Reinforcement in Dapped-End
Connections
Fig. 4. Test Setup of Specimen SP I (8 ft. span)
Fig. 5. Test Setup of Specimen SP II (5 ft. span)
Fig. 6. Failed Side Instrumentation of Specimen SP I (8 ft. span)
Fig. 7. Failed Side Instrumentation of Specimen SP II (5 ft. span)
Fig. 8. Shear-Flexure Failure of Specimen SP I
Fig. 9. Crack Propagation of Specimen SP I
Fig. 10. Shear-Flexure Failure of Specimen SP II
Fig. 11. Crack Propagation of Specimen SP II
Fig. 12. Load vs. Strain at the Reentrant Corners of Specimen SP I
Fig. 13. Load vs. Crack Width at the Reentrant Corners of Specimen SP II
Fig. 14. Load vs. Net Deflection of Specimen SP I
Fig. 15. Load vs. Net Deflection of Specimen SP II
22
Fig. 1. Lay-Out of Prestressing Strands
Section A-A
A
A
A
A
A
, 270 k
strands
12.125
15.875
0.5 25.33
3
3
/
4
2
4
6
2
2
2
4
1
/
4
C.G.C.
19.261
5
3
/
8
4
1
/
2
12.125
13.875
2
9 7 54 7 9
A
1 in. = 2.54cm
23
Fig. 2. Layout of Mild Reinforcement
1
1
/
2
1
1
1
/2
7
1
7
/8 4
1
/8
3
5
3
/
8
3
/
8
6
2 4
5
2
11
/16
2
11
/16
1
1
/
2
7
3
1
/
8
1
/
4
3
5
3
/
8
1 1
1
7
/
8
4
1
/
8
30
5
3
/
8
4
1
/
2
12
1
/
8
3
1
/
8
12
3
/
8
2
(2) - #6 BNT.
(GR.60 A706)
(1) - #7 5-6
3
/
8
1
11
/16
2
1
11
/16
1 in. = 2.54cm
24
Notations:
1 Flexure and Axial Tension in the Extended End, which cause the Nibs
Flexure Crack
2 Direct Shear Crack
3 Re-entrant Corner Crack
4 Nib Inclined Crack
5 Diagonal Tension Crack
A
s
= Area of flexural and axial tension reinforcement
A
sh
= Area of vertical reinforcement for diagonal cracks
A
v
= Area of diagonal tension reinforcement
Fig. 3. Potential Failure Modes and Required Reinforcement in Dapped-End
Connections
25
Fig. 5. Test Setup of Specimen SP II (5 ft. span)
Fig. 4. Test Setup of Specimen SP I (8 ft. span)
26
Fig. 6. Failed Side Instrumentation of Specimen SP I (8 ft. span)
Inclinometer
Load Cell #17
#11
#7
#16 #15 #14 #13
#1
#8 #3 #4 #5
#6
11 23 25 22.5 14
12
8 15.5 26 24 22
20 #22
#23
LVDT
Strain Gage
Fig. 7. Failed Side Instrumentation of Specimen SP II (5 ft. span)
#5
Load Cell #17
#4
#7
12
20
#5 #6
#11 #6
Inclinometer
20 16
8 28 24
#8
Extensometer #1
27
45.68 kips
40 kips
40 kips
28.22
kips
28.22
kips
Fig. 9. Crack Propagation of Specimen SP I
Fig. 8. Shear-Flexure Failure of Specimen SP I
28
57.40 kips
50 kips
40 kips
29.10 kips
Fig. 11. Crack Propagation of Specimen SP II
Fig. 10. Shear-Flexure Failure of Specimen SP II
29
21
23
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
-250 -150 -50 50 150 250 350 450 550 650 750 850
Strain(microstrain)
L
o
a
d
(
k
i
p
)
21
20
23
22
Fig. 12. Load vs. Strain at the Reentrant Corners of Specimen SP I
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02
Cracking Width (in.)
L
o
a
d
(
k
i
p
)
EX2
EX1
Fig. 13. Load vs. Crack Width at the Reentrant Corners of Specimen SP II
East
West
EX 2
EX 1
1 in. = 25.4mm
1 kip = 4.448kN
1 in. = 25.4mm
1 kip = 4.448kN
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Net Deflection (in)
L
o
a
d
(
k
i
p
)
5
LVDT #8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Net Deflection (in)
L
o
a
d
(
k
i
p
)
8
LVDT #11
Fig. 14. Load vs. Net Deflection of Specimen SP I
Fig. 15. Load vs. Net Deflection of Specimen SP II
Experimental
Experimental
1 in. = 25.4mm
1 kip = 4.448kN
1 in. = 25.4mm
1 kip = 4.448kN
31