From Local Police to Occupying Army, or

LESO: The Greater of Many Evils

by William Norman Grigg
by William Norman Grigg

There are Peacekeepers deployed in US cities, but they're not

under UN command.
They're armored personnel carriers supplied to “local” police
agencies for little or no cost through the Pentagon's Law
Enforcement Support Office (LESO), established in 1995 as
part of the Defense Logistics Agency.
Well, it sure ain't an RV: This
Since that time, the LESO has made huge amounts of military "Peacekeeper" Armored Personnel Carrier
hardware – from boots to helmets to ammo to helicopters and is listed by the Charleston, S.C. Police
the “Peacekeeper” APCs – available to local and state police Department as a "Patrol Vehicle."
agencies, often at little or no cost.
If you're interested in watching the Pentagon's promotional video for the LESO's campaign to militarize
“local” police, go to this page maintained by the DLA. At the bottom of the links you'll find one
leading to “LESO Get With The Program Video.” Follow that link, and – assuming you can withstand
the barrage of really obnoxious whitebread canned pseudo-funk PSL music – you will have the entire
program explained to you.
Fred Baille, a boileplater-spewing spokesdrone for the
DLA's Distribution Realization Policy Directorate (a
suitably Soviet title for a police-state agency), explains that
through the LESO program, “local” law enforcement
agencies can receive “excess” military gear of practically
any description “as if they were a DoD organization.”
What this means, in practical and tangible terms, is that
your local police has the same access to military hardware
as any branch of the armed services. In everything but
brand name, they're domestic appendages of the Pentagon.
The “Get With The Program” video demonstrates how easy
it is for police agencies to snag the swag: Simply call up the
LESO website, fill out a form “justifying” the order, and
send it in. And getting “surplus” Pentagon equipment is
depicted as a civic-minded thing to do, since getting the
federally subsidized military gear actually helps keep taxes
low.
Not discussed in the video are hidden costs of that subsidy.
The monetary costs are borne by taxpayers nation-wide.
But a much larger price is paid when communities no longer control their own police agencies.
When local police are supported by local tax funds, they are locally accountable. When those police are
materially and financially supported by Washington – to any extent – the locus of control and
accountability shifts there. That is the principle recognized in the Supreme Court's 1942 Wickard v.
Filburn decision.
The Bush Regime is trying to expand that principle in the case of Joshua Wolf, a videoblogger
imprisoned on federal contempt charges last fall for refusing to surrender videotape sought by federal
prosecutors.
The Feds claimed that Wolf's video contained footage of an attack by rioters on a San Francisco Police
Department squad car during a July 2005 protest. Wolf maintained that he didn't have the footage
sought by prosecutors – which allegedly showed the squad car being put on fire – and that under
California's shield law, he didn't have to surrender the tape. The Feds countered that because the SFPD
receives federal subsidies (for counter-narcotics and “homeland security” efforts, among other things),
the damaged squad car is federal property, and so the matter belongs in federal court, where California's
shield law doesn't apply.
That claim has yet to be resolved in the courts, but given that claims of this sort have been consistently
vindicated since, oh, about 1937, the suspense isn't exactly killing me.
Which leaves us here:
Any police agency that receives so much as a particle of federal aid is no longer a local police
force. It is, in principle, a federal army of occupation.
Yes, most policemen (including those seen in LESO's promotional video) are decent and honorable
people who honestly believe that they are serving and protecting their communities. But the people
who fund and control them are neither decent, nor honorable, and at a time of their choosing they can
execute Order 66 (if you'll pardon the allusion) and turn that army against us.
For decades, since the Kennedy administration unveiled its Freedom From War program for UN-
administered “general and complete disarmament,” many observers have wondered when the blue
helmets of the UN “Peace Force” would be dispatched to disarm Americans and put down patriotic
resistance. It's not impossible that such a scenario could eventually be played out, however unlikely it
is at present.
People who focus on the UN as the source of the immediate threat, however, are preoccupied with the
wrong threat vector.
January 31, 2007
William Norman Grigg [send him mail] writes the Pro Libertate blog.
Copyright © 2007 William Norman Grigg
William Norman Grigg Archives