Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
Submitted to:
Prof. Shalini Singh
Submitted by:
Akriti Agarwal
CFT08_007
Abhishek Singh
CFT08_
Aanad kumar
CFT08_
Gaurav Awasthi
CFT08_
Neha Shekhawat
CFT08_
1
Richa Garg
CFT08_111
PGDM 2008-10
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thank you
2
INTRODUCTION
3
comparable populations, India’s low mobile
penetration offers huge scope for growth.
4
In 1990s, telecommunications sector benefited from
the general opening up of the economy. Also,
examples of telecom revolution in many other
countries, which resulted in better quality of service
and lower tariffs, led Indian policy makers to initiate
a change process finally resulting in opening up of
telecom services sector for the private sector.
National Telecom Policy (NTP) 1994 was the first
attempt to give a comprehensive roadmap for the
Indian telecommunications sector. In 1997, Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was created.
TRAI was formed to act as a regulator to facilitate the
growth of the telecom sector. New National Telecom
Policy was adopted in 1999 and cellular services
were also launched in the same year.
5
Communications (GSM) and Code Division Multiple
Access (CDMA). The GSM sector is dominated by
Airtel, Vodfone-Hutch, and Idea Cellular, while the
CDMA sector is dominated by Reliance and Tata
Indicom. Opening up of international and domestic
long distance telephony services are the major
growth drivers for cellular industry. Cellular operators
get substantial revenue from these services, and
compensate them for reduction in tariffs on airtime,
which along with rental was the main source of
revenue. The reduction in tariffs for airtime, national
long distance, international long distance, and
handset prices has driven demand.
Cellular Service
Overview
6
Growth Drivers
Subscribers
7
has increased to 21.20% in August 2007 as
compared to 20.52% in July 2007.
In the wireless segment, 8.31 million subscribers
have been added in August 2007 while 8.06 million
subscribers were added in July 2007. The total
wireless subscribers (GSM, CDMA & WLL(F)) base
reaches 201.29 million at the end of August 2007.
8
PROBLEM STATEMENT
• Services qualities
• Network coverage
• Family/group/peer influence
• Value added services
• Internet protocol television services
9
• Gender, age and residential region
• Consistency of services
• Frequent changing nature of people
• Influence of promotional activities
• Mobile termination rates(the cost per minutes of
terminating the call).
• Faith in brand
• Variety of tariff plan
10
RESEARCH DESIGN
• Secondary literature
CONCLUSIVE DESIGNS
11
• Under descriptive research we will be using multi
cross sectional where we will be analyzing
different segments on the basis of age group,
income and standard of living.
SAMPLING
Population
Target population
Sampling frame
12
Sample size
Sampling design
13
fulfills their needs (Mowen & Minor, 1998).
Understanding why a consumer choose a product
based upon its attributes helps marketers to
understand why some consumers have preferences
for certain brands (Gwin & Gwin, 2003). In the study
by Gwin and Gwin (2003), the Lancaster model of
consumer demand (1966, 1979), also reffered to as
the product attributes model,was used to evaluate
brand positioning.This model assumes that consumer
choice is based on the characteristics (or attributes)
of a
brand.Each product is abundle of attributes and that
choice is based on maximizing utility/satisfaction
from the attritubes subject to budget constraints.
However there were two limitataions of the model:
(1) the model is static and deterministic and (2) the
model does not explain how the preferences for
attributes were formed.This article also also didi not
mention if experience with the product played a part
in influencing attributes preferences. Both tangible
nad intangible attributes of a product are equally
important in choosing a product or brand (Myers,
2003). There is no evidence that certain attributes
are more related to customer loyalty than others
(Romariuk & Sharp, 2003). It was, found
though, that the more attributes (non-negative)
associated with a brand, the more loyal the customer
(Romariuk & Sharp,2003).Romariuk and Sharp (2003)
suggested that marketers should focus more on how
many attributes the brand should be associated with
and not what attributes. However, this study did not
specify what sort of attributes marketers should
14
associate the brand with; i.e. whether they should be
relevant or irrelevant attributes, tangible or
intangible etc.This is because it is important that
consumer accurately lean about product attribute
performances since it would influence their
interpretations of product performance by causing
memory encode and retrieval bias.Unfounded
product attribute relationship beliefs can mislead
them into expecting something that is not there.
(Mason & Bequette, 1998). Hence if products fall
short of customer expectataions,then dissactisfaction
would result.Nevertheless, it was found that
through irrelevant, some attributes may still be
important in influencing consumer
choice.Persistent preferences for product attribute
soccurs when there is low ambiguity in the initial
potential choice for salient attributes coupled with
experience,although those attributes maybe
irrelevant (i.e. an attributes usually not associated
with favourable brand outcomes (Muthukrishnan &
Kardes, 2001). Consequently, Mason and Bequette
(1998) also said that perceptions on product
performance based on salient attributes are more
important in influencing the consumer purchase
behaviour than actual product attribute
performances. Similarly, Myers (2003) concluded
that brand equity may be more influenced by
attribute knowledge more than consumer preference.
For low-involvement products, consumers have more
objective view of the nature of the attrinutes (eg.
food, cosmetics) because they are constantly being
15
advertised and promoted.Similarly Rioo, Vasquez and
Iglesias (2001) sugggeated that consumer
16
deliver certain impressions to other people in their
environment (del Rio,Vasquez & Iglesiaz, 2001),
Therefore the brand name benefits perceived by
consumers is highly interrelated to the product-
based benefits. Big brand means a better image and
a better product (del Rio,Vasquez & Iglesiaz, 2001),
Howevwer, as mention earlier, Mason and Bequette
(1998) suggested that perceived product
performance is more important than actual attribute
performance. Similarly Myers (2003) concluded that
brand equity might be influenced by attribute
knowledge more than consumer preference. This
may be due to consumer biasness and prejudice,
Consumers’ product evaluations are influenced by
memory. The biasness can be reduced by having
current information, experience and knowledge
(Mason and Bequette ,1998). Therefore, it’s not
surprising that brands that consumers believe offer
superior value are most preferred brands chosen
often (Myers, 2003). Brands with higher equity
resulted in greater preferences and high market
shares. Price is another form of attribute used by
consumers to evaluate a product.Price can
sometimes be an indicator of quality; with a higher
price indicating higher quality (Mowen & Minor, 1998;
Siu & Wong, 2002). Consumers perceive that a
higher price can be attributed to the higher cost of
quality control (Siu & Wong, 2002). Some consumers
are highly price sensitive (elastic demand),whereby a
high prices may shift consumers to competitive
brands (Mowen & Minor, 1998). Therefore price can
have a positive or negative influence on customers
17
selection criteria & Brand Mobile Service Preference
Provider
Service Quality
Traditionally, service quality has been conceptualized
as the difference between customer expectations
regarding a mobile service to be received and
perceptions of the service being received (Grönroos,
2001; Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988). In
some earlier studies, service quality has been
referred as the extent to which a service meets
customers’ needs or expectations (Lewis & Mitchell,
1990; Dotchin & Oakland, 1994
18
(e) Responsiveness - willingness to help customers
and provide prompt service. After a comprehensive
review of service quality studies, Asubonteng,
McCleary, and Swan (1996) concluded that the
number of service quality dimensions varies in
different industries. For example, Kettinger and Lee
(1994) identified four dimensions in a study of
information systems (IS) quality, which did not have
tangible dimension. Cronin and
Taylor (1992) developed a one-factor measurement
instrument instead of the five-factor measures
proposed by Parasuraman et al. (1988). Besides
SERVQUAL, Sureshchandar,
Rajendran, and Anantharaman (2003) have identified
five factors of service quality from the customers’
perspective. Those are:
a) Core service or service product
b) Human element of service delivery
c) Systematization of service delivery: non- human
element
d) Tangibles of service
e) Social responsibility.
After a close inspection it could be safely concluded
that the newly defined construct of service quality by
Sureshchandar et al. (2003) has some resemblance
with the definition provided by Parasuraman et al.
(1988). For this study the researchers have
employed the
five dimensions of service quality proposed by
Parasuraman et al. (1988).
19
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY :
20
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
200
180
160
140
120
MALE
100
FEMALE
80
60
40
20
0
NUMBER %AGE
21
INTERPRETATION: The graphical representation of the
table shows that out of 300 respondents 120 were male and
180 were female.
350
300
250
200
Yes
150 No
100
50
0
NUMBER %AGE
INTERPRETATION:
All the respondents had mobile connections.
22
2. How many mobile connections do you have?
No. of respondents
300
243
250
200
100
57
50
0 0
0
1 2 3 >3
INTERPRETATION:
out of 300 respondents 243 says that they had 1 connection
while 57 were having 2 connections.
23
3. Which service are you using?
Particulars No. of respondents
Prepaid 187
postpaid 113
No. of respondents
200 187
180
160
140
113
120
100 No. of respondents
80
60
40
20
0
Prepaid postpaid
INTERPRETATION:
Out of 300 respondents 187 were using prepaid connections
while 113 respondents were using postpaid connections.
24
4. Which Mobile connection are you currently using?
PARTICULARS NO.OF
RESPONDENT
S
AIRTEL 154
VODAFONE 98
BSNL 19
SPICE 19
RELIANCE 6
TATA INDICOM 4
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
180
160
140
120
100
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
80
60
40
20
0
M
E
O
L
C
L
IC
E
IC
N
N
T
D
S
F
A
IR
IN
A
LI
S
A
A
O
T
V
A
T
INTERPRETATION:
25
Out of 300 respondents 154 were using airtel, 98 were using
Vodafone, 19 were using BSNL and spice, 6 were using
reliance while 4 were using tata indicom.
PARTICULARS NUMBER
Yes 237
No 63
NUMBER
250 237
200
150
NUMBER
100
63
50
0
Yes No
INTERPRETATION:
Out of 300 respondents 237 respondents were satisfied with
the services of there particular service providers while only
63 were not satisfied.
26
6. Which facility attracts you most?
PARTICULARS No. of
respondents
COVERAGE 182
CALL CHARGES 63
ROAMING CHARGES 5
G.P.R.S. 44
OTHERS 6
No. of respondents
200 182
180
160
140
120
100 No. of respondents
80 63
60 44
40
20 5 6
0
COVERAGE CALL ROAMING G.P.R.S. OTHERS
CHARGES CHARGES
27
INTERPRETATION:
Out 300 respondents 182 respondents were attracted by the
coverage facility, 63 by call charges, 5 by roaming charges,
44 by G.P.R.S while 6 were attracted by others.
7. Which advertisement media puts more impact on
your buying decision?
PARTICULARS NO. RESPONDENTS
T.V. 92
MAGAZINES 7
NEWSPAPERS 65
INTERNET 88
OTHERS 48
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
100
80
60
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
40
20
S
0
T
S
S
E
E
R
N
IN
.
P
.V
E
R
A
Z
TH
T
E
P
A
T
S
G
O
IN
W
A
E
M
INTERPRETATION:
Out of 300 respondents 92 gets aware of cellular services by
T.V, 88 by internet,65 by news papers, 48 by others while 7
by magazines.
28
8. How much is your monthly expenses on mobile
phones?
PARTICULARS NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
Less than 150 88
150-350 157
350-500 34
Above 500 21
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
180
160
140
120
100
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
80
60
40
20
0
Less than 150 150-350 350-500 Above 500
INTERPRETATION:
Out of 300 respondents most of the respondents monthly
expenses were 150-350, 88 had monthly expenses of less
29
than 150, 34 had 350-500 while only 21 were having
monthly expenses of above 500.
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
160 143
140
120
100 92
80 NO. OF RESPONDENTS
60 50
40
15
20
0
1 year 2 years 3 years More than 3
years
INTERPRETATION:
30
Out of 300 respondents 165 were availing the services of
there particular service providers since 2 years, 80 since 1
year, 40 since 3 years while only 15 were availing the
services from more than 3 years.
No. OF RESPONDENTS
250 233
200
150
No. OF RESPONDENTS
100
67
50
0
Yes No
INTERPRETATION:
31
Out of 300 respondents 233 did not want to change there
current service providers while only 67 respondents want to
change there current service providers.
32
• In our survey we found that maximum people
have a single mobile connection (270 out of
302).
33
(151 out of 302) and the respondents who said
yes were around 148
34
• Schemes were rated slightly important by the
maximum respondents.
35
• Distribution centres in the prepaid connections
are considered to be the most important by the
19.2% of the respondents.
36
• International direct dialing in post paid
connections is rated as most important by the
12 respondents out of 35.
37
We find out that maximum respondents have only
single connection and the most preferred brand used
by customers is airtel and reliance.
38
FINDINGS
39
• T.V. and internet are the best media
advertisements that put more impact on the
students buying decisions
RECOMMENDATIONS
40
are the most prefered factors by the
respondents.
41
they were using there connections since 10
months.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:
• Marketing Research – G. C. Beri
• Research Methodology – C.R Kothari
• Principles of Marketing – Philip Kotler
Web Resources:
• www.trai.gov.in
• http://www.tataindicom.com/t-aboutus-ttsl-
organization.aspx
• http://www.rcom.co.in/webapp/Communications/
rcom/Aboutus/aboutus_home.jsp
42
• http://www.ideacellular.com/IDEA.portal?
_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=IDEA_Page_AboutIdea
• http://www.bsnl.co.in/about.htm
QUESTIONNAIRE
1 2 3 more than 3
43
3. Which mobile connection you are currently using?
Yes No
6. For how long you are availing service of this particular service
provider?
8. Would you like to switch from your current service provider in the
future?
yes no
44
9. Please rate your preference in selecting a service provider on the
following scale :-
o 1 – not important
o 2 – slightly important
o 3 – average
o 4 – important
o 5 – most important
Parameters
1 2 3 4 5
1.Voicemail
2. 3 way calling
3.Call waiting
4.Call Forwarding
5.Call Hold
6. Call Restriction
7. Intercity call Transfer
8.caller tunes
9.Call drop
10.Voice clarity
11. CLIP(Caller tune identity presentation)
12. set related schemes
13.Roaming charges
14.Internet Facility
Parameters
1 2 3 4 5
1. Availability of Recharge Vouchers
2.Mode of Recharge
3. Balance expiry/inquiry
45
4.Special messages and tones
5.Distribution Centers
6. tariff vouchers
7.Periodic reviews
8.Customer service
Parameters 1 2 3 4 5
1.Accuracy of the bill
2.Timeliness
3.Flexibility on mode of Payment
4.Infoshop
5. International direct dial
6.Itemized billing
7. one touch GPRS(MMS)
8.Remind billings
9.Detailed billing facilities
46
47
48
+
49