Professional Documents
Culture Documents
html
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the UN in 1948
as a response to the Nazi holocaust and to set a standard by which the human rights
activities of all nations, rich and poor alike, are to be measured.
Preamble: Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights
of all members of the human family is the foundation of the freedom, justice and peace in the
world.
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in
fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal
rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards
of life in larger freedom.
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United
Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and
fundamental freedoms.
Now, therefore The General Assembly proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights
1 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every
individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive
by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive
measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and
observance.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall deem most
likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution also protects prisoners
against cruel and unusual punishment, specifically banning excessive bail and fines.
The Drug War has created Draconian prison sentences and asset forfeitures that are
disproportionate to the offense. Federal mandatory minimum sentences put first-time,
nonviolent, low-level drug offenders in prison for five, 10, 20 years or even life, without
parole - often for longer terms than violent criminals convicted of murder, rape or robbery,
2 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
felons who are eligible for parole. Urine testing without probable cause is an insidious
example of degrading treatment that has become a familiar routine in American schools and
the corporate work place.
Sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum penalty laws tie judges hands when it comes
to dispensing justice. Physical evidence is replaced with exaggerated estimates. In a group
offense, each person is liable for the whole amount instead of their actual level of
involvement. Back room plea bargaining has replaced public hearings. Furthermore, under
federal civil asset forfeiture law, a person's entire life savings can be seized, without a prior
hearing, and without even being charged with a crime. If the property has a value of less than
$500,000 it can be forfeited administratively, without any judicial proceedings unless the
owner posts a cost bond. Even if he pays the cost bond, the owner can still be deprived of the
right to a jury trial through summary judgment, if the judge is not satisfied with the amount of
proof he submits on paper. Since most judges have come up the ranks as hard-nosed
prosecutors, they are often biased against the accused.
3 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
The Fifth Amendment further adds the right to a speedy trial and right to legal
counsel and forbids the use of secret witnesses by requiring their testimony in court.
In Drug War criminal cases, anonymous informants can reduce or work off charges and even
receive payment and commissions to provide "evidence" for search warrants, and lawyers refer
to a de facto "drug war exception" to the Bill of Rights. Police use entrapment to lure people
to break the law under a system that creates a conflict of interest due to the seizure of property
for law enforcement use. These problems are compounded by prosecutorial misconduct, vague
and overly broad conspiracy charges, changes of venue, biased judicial instructions, limits
placed on defense evidence and motivation, etc.
The Fourth Amendment protects the people from "unreasonable searches and
seizures" by requiring that "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported
by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized."
In recent years, people in the U.S. have suffered increasing intrusions on their privacy,
including phone taps, invasive urine testing, infra-red scanning of homes, garbage and mail
searches, computer searches of bank records and utility bills. Employees are routinely
subjected to random urine testing, with neither probable cause nor warrant, as a job
requirement. Police sweep neighborhoods and block public roadways to search people,
sometimes with dogs. If your appearance fits one of the stereotypical "profiles," you may be
singled out for special harassment. Having $100 cash on your person is all it takes for police to
seize your money as suspected drug income, even when you can prove otherwise. And when
4 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
warrants are still issued, they are often based on hearsay evidence, high-tech surveillance and
monitoring systems even the amount of electricity a home or business uses in a month or gauge
the amount of heat it gives off.
The Fourth Amendment lists "The right of the people to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects".
What happens to the children when narcotics police take the family car and home, and send
Mommy and Daddy to prison for decades at a time under mandatory minimum sentences?
How does it affect children to see their parents tied up face down on the floor while armed
men in dark suits tear the house apart? How can a person support their family from prison,
financially or emotionally? How can an inner city community survive with a quarter of its
adult male population stigmatized by a criminal record? Indeed, the family is a primary target
of the Drug War.
Under US civil asset forfeiture laws, police agencies and informants get to keep the proceeds
of their confiscations. Inherent conflicts of interest arise from forfeiture laws. Property of
innocent parties has often been seized by police agencies without even a conviction. Forfeiture
victims do not have to be charged with a crime to lose their homes, cars or life savings. Often
they are deprived of their right to trial. Although the US Supreme Court held in 1993 that
5 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
The government has prosecuted every effort to formulate and establish new religions that
involve the use of mind expanding drugs. When Drug War zeal even infringed on the Native
American Church by forbidding the use of peyote in its ceremonies, Congress created a
special, narrow exemption for its practitioners through the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
of 1993, but the Supreme Court in 1997 overturned the law. And what about other religions?
The Drug War has effectively outlawed traditional cannabis-based religions such as the
Rastafari, Coptic Christians, Sufi Moslem, Sadhu Hindu, etc. Members of these churches are
singled out and prosecuted for practicing their religions by partaking of their sacraments.
Frequently they are targeted for harassment, surveillance and entrapment, and courts routinely
exclude any testimony or reference to their religious motives when "the facts" of a case are
presented to a jury. Once members of a congregation are convicted felons, as a condition of
parole after serving a prison sentence, they are forbidden to associate, congregate or worship
together, or even remain in contact.
6 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
Hemp is a raw material used for at least 10,000 years for making food, clothing, housing,
paper and other consumer goods. The U.S. once had laws requiring farmers to grow hemp, and
Presidents Washington and Jefferson, among others, would today be sentenced to death for
growing their acreage of this rugged and versatile crop. Every President since Franklin
Roosevelt, including Bill Clinton in 1994, has listed hemp as an essential strategic material for
the national defense. But it is illegal to grow here and all hemp must be imported. Banning
hemp suppresses domestic jobs and enterprise in the hemp industries, at an estimated cost of a
million jobs and tens of billions of dollars in business. The Drug War deprives patients of
medical marijuana, an effective, natural healing agent. The Drug Enforcement Administration
forbids health care professionals from administering or even recommending cannabis, even
when they know it will help.
7 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
Monetary incentives of up to $100 are offered to students who snitch on fellow students,
teaching them young that it pays to betray. But is that what schools are supposed to be
teaching our children?
"Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
of the right of the people peaceably to assemble," states the US Constitution First
Amendment.
The Drug War targets specific subcultures identified as having an interest in illicit substances.
The Rastafari, hippies, and musical fans of jazz, reggae, hip-hop, the Grateful Dead (known as
Deadheads), and certain other persuasions are singled out for persecution. Police barricade the
roadways leading to political rallies and annual events, such as the Rainbow Family
Gathering. Participants are systematically harassed, intimidated and provoked by authorities
instigating trouble. Similarly, political groups are infiltrated by police provocateurs who try to
incite violence and undermine the legitimate activities of these organizations. People who take
advantage of scientific advancements in the medical use of cannabis face criminal prosecution.
The same bureaucrats who insist we need more research are the very ones who block such
studies. Federal agencies such as National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) substitute
propaganda for science to manipulate research data. They publish biased reports to prop up
prohibition. Researchers who produce accurate data tend to have their funds cut and permits
8 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM
Universal Declaration on Human Rights http://www.hr95.org/Udhr.html
revoked. Those who support the Drug War with unsubstantiated theories of bizarre risks are
likely to receive funding increases and gain easy access to news media and lawmakers. Long
after spurious claims have been proven false, such as marijuana inducing "brain damage" and
"male breasts," or LSD causing "chromosomal mutation," these hysterical charges continue to
appear in government publications.
We hereby declare that the Drug War violates many of the most fundamental tenants of human
rights, and call on the U.S. government and all international human rights agencies to review
this record with an unbiased and objective eye on the human rights issued involved.
Contingent with this investigation, we request an immediate remedy and redress of grievances
through the release of those wrongly or unfairly imprisoned and the full restoration of human
rights to all Americans.
Home
Prisoners Photo Gallery
9 of 9 01/07/10 2:37 PM