Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: Scope
Procter & Gamble Co. have large company markets around the world. There are
many brands name under P&G Co. and their products can be found in more than 140
countries in the world. Scope brand of mouthwash product are one of them.
Their purpose are to provide branded products and services of superior quality and
value that improve the lives of the world's consumers for now and next generation. From
that, they can get reward from customer for leadership sales and leading brand name in
market.
It has 5 main operating division that organized by product category. They are Paper
product, Food& beverage, Beauty care, Health care and Laundry &cleaning.
This mouthwash product has been around for well over hundred years. It has good
reputation as notable brand that kills the germs that cause the bad breath. It also can be
successful although it not as old as Listerine product in mouthwash market.
Scope products have serves same function like another mouthwash product but it has
been proven to kill more germs. Otherwise it also well knows as bad breath remedy.
Scope product are just not available in original mint flavor (green), but also in a citrus
(orange), peppermint (blue), cinnamon (red) flavors & new Scope White. Its major
competitor in mouthwash market is a Listerine brand.
Define Problems
From the case, there are two main problem that has be faced by Scope brand from Procter
and Gamble Company.
The first is a how is the way for P&G to develop a strategy that would ensure the
continued profitability of scope in the face of these competitive threats? This mean that their
old strategies are not suitable with the customer needs. The innovations from other brand
competitors make their brand are decrease in customers satisfaction.
The second is a how to maintain their profit and make sure the Scope brand is always
be the 1st in mouthwash product ranking? This means that the Scope ranking is decrease
from the first choice to second choice of customer. Listerine be the popular and the first
choice of customers.
SWOT analysis
STRENGTHS
• Scope was long experience in the oral hygiene industry since 1967.
• The taste or flavor of Scope better than other mouthwashes.
• High-quality product, quality processes and procedures.
• Have a first rating in mouthwash market share.
WEAKNESSES
• Not enough make a distribution channel.
• Lack of canning or packaging.
• Undifferentiated products or services with other competitor.
OPPORTUNITIES
• Brand which it concentrate for a healthy oral.
• Move into new market segment that offer improves profit.
• A developing market such as in the Internet.
• Place more distribution channel such as more drugstore and food store
THREAT
• Too many competitor in this industry.
• Price wars with other competitor.
• Not patentable , competitor can attempt to duplicate a product
Canadian Mouthwash Market Shares
Units
Brand / Year 1988 1989 1990
Scope 33.0% 33.0% 32.3%
Listerine 15.2 16.2 16.6
Listermint 15.2 9.8 10.6
Cepacol 13.6 10.6 10.3
Colgate oral rinse 1.4 1.2 0.5
Plax 1.0 10.0 10.0
Store brand 16.0 15.4 16.0
Miscellaneous other 4.6 3.9 3.7
Total 100% 100% 100%
Retail sales (000,000) $60.2 $65.4 $68.6
According to Canadian mouthwash market shares, scope was have a first rating in
mouthwash market share in 3 years. There is 33.0% in 1988 and 1989, 32.3% in 1990. While
under the Scope is Listerine, followed by Listermint, Cepacol, Colgate oral rinse, Plax, and
others.
For the consumer perception of brand images, attributes of Scope has many scores lower than
average. That’s means Scope has reduced bad breath only than other product which more
better perception from consumer such as Listerine, which this brand can reduces bad breath,
kill germs, removes plaque, healthier teeth and gums , good for preventing colds and most of
As we know, P&G had created a mouthwash product called Scope. The function of
the Scope emphasizing more to reduces bad breath rather than kills germs, removes plaque
and to have healthier teeth like others mouthwash products. In order to sustain their
credibility as a good healthcare product, P&G should come out with new product which is
more functioning and innovative.
An innovation could be implemented by trying to create a new dimension of
performance which includes the process of making an improvement of the product available.
For examples; produce a product that closely functioning like a mouthwash products such as
dental gums. Dental gums are promoted to reduced plaque, whiten teeth, and reduce the risk
of tooth decay.
Unlike a mouthwash product, chewing gum is associated with increased salivary flow
which apparently produces a beneficial buffering effect against acids in the oral cavity.
Actually these products are not present to be a substitute to the others oral hygiene products.
It is another healthcare product which is easier for those who are unable to brush their teeth.
Instead of that, P&G had implementing a product extension which is versions of the
same parent product that serve a segment of the target market and increase the variety of an
offering. For examples in November 2004, P&G come out with their new mouthwash
product called Crest Pro-Health which present as their product extension. This product is in
the same product category of the mouthwash products. The effort is intended to draw
Listerine users who've resisted P&G's Scope.
Crest Pro-Health Rinse will be positioned as a germ-killer. Unlike Listerine, Pro-
Health does not use alcohol. More function has been added to meet the customers demand
with the improved mouthwash formula. Crest Pro-Health Rinse is effective against a broad
range of bacteria commonly associated with plaque and gingivitis which it is provides 12-
hour protection. Thus, it gives customer greater choice besides it can helps to protect the
company against the competitors.
Develop a plan for implementing the chosen alternative
Establish a R& D (research and development) group which able to make a new innovation of
Scope products
To form a research group (means to have a research group which will do market research and
analysis on their product as well as comparison with other products) who can improve the
existing product and can develop a market research or analysis.
Removes plaque - + + - + -
+ = scores higher than average (- ) = scores lower than average (…) = scored about average
• Was the decision appropriate, given the situation identified in the case setting?
Yes, the decision was appropriate. As u know that the Listerine has done this and
grown up by doing this in the last few years. Examples can be cited from cross
functional industries where investment in marketing the product has proven
successful like Pepsi, Sony, Nokia, etc