You are on page 1of 2

18 Section A AUGUST 2007 The Woodside News

THE BIBLE AND SCIENCE BY WILLIAM T. PELLETIER, PH.D [WOODSIDE NEWS COLUMNIST]

Extreme Makeover: of the flood waters, how so was my later journey to God.” too long to cool, leaving no halos. This
Noah fit animals (including Strobel confronts eight eminent scien- evidence caused Gentry to abandon his
Library Edition dinosaurs) on the ark, and tists and philosophers with an atheist’s evolutionary beliefs. Gentry believes

D ozing in the sun last


week waiting for your
swimsuit to dry, did you ask
the age of the earth.

The Lie: Evolution—Ken Ham


tough questions. The cross-examina-
tions build a strong scientific case that
the universe was intelligently designed,
the halos are some of the Creator’s
“fingerprints.” His investigations show
evidence for a global flood and earth’s
yourself, “How’s my Bible- Founder of Answers in and they show the logical and eviden- age in thousands rather than billions of
Science bookshelf shaping Genesis with its newly-built tial weaknesses of Darwinism. His years. Evolutionists call Gentry’s halos
up?” School’s approaching, so Creation Museum, Ham says questions involve cosmology, astrono- a “tiny mystery” but have proposed no
here’s a Bible-Science WILLIAMPH.D.
T. PELLETIER
Genesis is foundational to all my, physics, cellular biology, biochem- other explanation.
Starter Library to help you Christian doctrine and must istry, and DNA. The story is absorb-
get ready. These dozen books be interpreted literally. ing. The arguments are compelling. Darwin on Trial—Phillip Johnson
are rich brain food on Creation, Doctrines like sin and salvation, Evolutionism is no longer scientifically Johnson is a law professor at UC
Evolution, Intelligent Design, Rock institutions like marriage and govern- or logically tenable. Science and the Berkeley and one of the founders of
Layers, Fossils, Dinosaurs, and ment, the beginnings of culture and Bible give consistent testimony of a the Intelligent Design movement. He
Noah’s Flood. Reading them will industry—all have their foundation in Creator. A student edition is available looked at the evidence for evolution
boost thinking skills, strengthen Bib- Genesis. for younger readers. from a lawyer’s perspective—analyz-
lical convictions, and superbly pre- Ham argues that if God does not ing arguments, identifying assump-
pare you for some great conversations really mean what He says in Genesis, Creation’s Tiny Mystery—Robert tions, and seeking proof. His devas-
with unbelieving friends or question- why should we trust the rest of the Gentry tating critique of Darwinism exposes
ing believers. Bible? The religion of Evolutionism is Having discovered riveting evi- the lack of evidence and the Swiss-
Authors include a physical a lie from the pit and is the root cause dence for creation, Gentry struggled cheese logic patching the theory
chemist, hydraulic engineer, bio- of most of the world’s problems against the scientific establishment together. It also reveals Darwinism as
chemist, law professor, geneticist, because it denies God the Creator. that strove to suppress it. Originally an a philosophical belief system, not a

To believe that complex biological systems were


gradually built up by small random changes is a
“flagrant denial of common sense…an entirely unsub-
stantiated belief for which there is not the slightest
evidence whatsoever.” – DR. MICHAEL DENTON, AGNOSTIC AND GENETICIST
molecular biologist, journalist, chess Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! — ardent evolutionist, Gentry found scientific theory. Johnson unleashes
champion, educator, medical doctor, Duane Gish radioactive polonium halos in earth’s an argumentative knock-out punch.
theologian, and computer consultant. Dr. Gish, a biochemist and pre- basement rocks. The half-life is so
Not all are creationists, Christians, or mier creationist debater, annihilates short (three minutes) that the rocks Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical
even theists. Some accept the Big the supposed primary evidence for had to solidify rapidly for halos to Challenge to Evolution—Michael Behe
Bang, stellar evolution, a long age for evolution—the fossil record. Darwin form. Molten rock would have taken Biochemistry professor Michael
the universe, and even aspects of bio- himself realized the Behe from Lehigh
logical evolution. Nevertheless, all strongest objection to University is one of the
distinctly contribute to a Biblical evolution was that fathers of the Intelligent
understanding of science. None is fossils did not support Design movement. He
infallible. Always measure everything it, asking, “If species argues that living cells are
you read by the Bible. have descended from too complex to have gradual-
These books are high-school level other species by ly evolved through random
and up. For balance and variety, I insensibly fine grada- changes. He gives examples
selected only one book per author, tions, why do we not of “irreducibly complex” cel-
even though several authored multiple everywhere see innu- lular subsystems. These are
books that could be on this list. Most merable transitional systems that require multiple
are available through Woodside’s forms?” Gish shows components to be function-
bookstore or library. the fossil record is ing in place for the system to
characterized by work—the removal of any
The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record abrupt appearance of component disables the sys-
and Its Scientific Implications—Henry life forms, absence of tem. Such systems cannot be
Morris and John Whitcomb transitional forms, incrementally constructed,
Dr. Morris, hydraulic engineering and constancy of life yet work during construc-
professor and founder of the Institute forms. Thus fossils tion. Behe believes these
for Creation Research, is the father of support creation but complex systems are definite
modern scientific Biblical creationism, undermine macroevo- evidence of an Intelligent
and this book laid the foundation. Dr. lution. Designer, because complexi-
Whitcomb is a seminary professor. ty, design and order never
This book is the best resource for The Case for a happen by chance.
Noah’s Flood. First published in 1961, Creator—Lee Strobel
it’s been reprinted 32 times and is still Strobel, a Yale Evolution, A Theory in
a must-read. In 2006 Christianity Law School graduate, Crisis—Michael Denton
Today ranked it #22 among “The Top journalist, legal editor, In 1985 Dr. Denton, an
50 Books That Have Shaped and pastor, was a spir- Australian geneticist and
Evangelicals” in the last half-century. itual skeptic well into medical doctor stunned aca-
It argues for a worldwide flood and his career. He said, demia with his comprehen-
explains how rock layers, fossils, and “My road to atheism sive critique of evolution
Ice Age resulted from Noah’s Flood. It was paved by sci- and his solid case for intelli-
addresses the sources and disposition ence…But, ironically,
SCIENCE continued on page 19
The Woodside News AUGUST 2007 Section A 19

SCIENCE continued from page 18 interesting and understandable. Dr.


gent design. Although not a creation- Huse’s three-fold purpose is to expose
ist, he challenged macroevolution with scientific fallacies of evolution, to
logic and scientific evidence from tax- present scientific evidence for Biblical
onomy, fossils, embryos, molecular creation, and to demonstrate that
biology, biochemistry, and probability. evolution and creation are contradic-
Denton, an agnostic, calls it a “flagrant tory and irreconcilable. Huse, an edu-
denial of common sense” to believe cator and computer consultant builds
that complex biological systems were his case with examples from geology,
gradually built up by small random paleontology, physics, astronomy,
changes. This is an “entirely unsub- mathematics, biology, and anthropol-
stantiated belief for which there is not ogy. Huse concludes, “Evolution is an
the slightest evidence whatsoever.” unreasonable and unfounded hypoth-
This book influenced intelligent esis that is riddled with countless sci-
design proponents Phillip Johnson entific fallacies…There is an abun-
and Michael Behe to reject dance of impressive and convincing
Darwinism. scientific evidence which can be used
to justify an intelligent faith in bibli-
Refuting Evolution—Jonathan Sarfati cal Christianity.”
Dr. Sarfati is a physical chemist
and former New Zealand chess cham- Of Pandas and People: The Central
pion. This insightful critique of mod- Question of Biological Origins—
ern evolutionary theory was in Percival Davis and Dean Kenyon
response to "Teaching about Evolution Davis, author of several biology
and the Nature of Science", distributed textbooks, and Kenyon, biology pro-
to schools nationwide by the National fessor at San Francisco State
Academy of Sciences. Sarfati’s sequel, University and ex-evolutionist, have
Refuting Evolution 2, responded to the written a supplementary biology text-
PBS-TV series: Evolution. Sarfati’s book that presents origins informa-
books constitute an excellent summary tion from six areas of biology. It dis-
of rational arguments for creation— cusses pros and cons of two compet-
and logical rebuttals to current argu- ing interpretations of this biological
ments for evolution. data—evolution and intelligent
design. The authors distinguish
Icons of Evolution: Why Much of What between hard data and interpreta-
We Teach about Evolution Is Wrong — tions of data. To develop thinking
Jonathan Wells skills, they encourage students to
Textbooks are full of deliberate draw their own conclusions about
misinformation about evolution. These how well data fits each explanatory
include the 1953 Miller-Urey origin- model. The book is interesting and
of-life experiment, Darwin’s tree of accessible with material presented at
life, Haeckel’s embryos, archaeopteryx, 2 levels—a light overview and an in-
the fossil horse series, peppered moths, depth treatment.
Darwin’s finches, and ape-to-human This starter library documents
drawings. Dr. Wells, a molecular and the paucity of evidence for
cell biologist, debunks these infamous Darwinism and the plethora of evi-
“proofs” of evolution which still litter dence for Creation. Evolutionism is
textbooks. Wells asks, “If the icons of not science, but atheistic naturalism
evolution are supposed to be our best masquerading as science. True sci-
evidence for Darwin’s theory, and all of ence points to God. Biblical
them are false or misleading, what does Creationism is soundly supported by
that tell us about the theory? Is it sci- scientific evidence, logical reasoning,
ence or myth?” and Scripture.

The Collapse of Evolution—Scott Huse Dr. Pelletier may be contacted by email


This book is well-organized, at BibleScienceGuy@WoodsideNews.org
©2000 070 William T. Pelletier

You might also like