Table Games Will NotSolve Pennsylvania’sFinancial Problems
Earlier this year, the Legislature passed a bill to allowPennsylvania’s casinos to offer table games like black jackand poker. I was firmly opposed to the legalization of slotmachine gaming in our Commonwealth and I was equallyopposed to this expansion of gambling.Since the inception of slot machine gaming inPennsylvania, we have seen many serious problems withhe licensing and oversight of casinos. Pennsylvania’sgaming industry is in need of significant reform and muchgreater regulation. Until those reforms are implemented,it would be the height of irresponsibility to even consider expanding this industry.Even with reforms, I have serious doubts about whether expanded gaming will have the effect its advocates promise.hen slot machine gaming was legalized, we heard promisesof significant property tax relief, but so far, the property taxrelief we have seen is well below expectations. Given thatfact, it is foolish to rely on revenue from expanded gamingo help resolve our budget problems.Beyond those concerns, I am deeply troubled by thenegative impact legalized gambling is already having on our communities. This expansion of the gambling will almostcertainly increase that impact.Given the significant regulatory problems, as well as thequestionable fiscal impact and negative societal effects fromlegalized gaming, I do not believe expanding the industry washe right decision for Pennsylvania.
State Budget Process inNeed of Reform
The extended delay in passing the state budget for the 2009-10 fiscalyear had a negative impact on many worthwhile and important entities,causes, and missions across Pennsylvania including organizations thathelp the homeless, Pennsylvanians with disabilities, public school districts,county governments, child care services, and veteran services. Someschool children were even deprived of basic educational materials becausethe governor chose to veto funding for them even though it was availablein a bridge budget that reached his desk. As lawmakers, it is our responsibility to pass a balanced state budgetby the June 30 deadline, and we must take steps to ensure that whathappened last year will never happen again. Two legislative proposalshave been offered to help us avoid this type of impasse in the future.While they may not be the total solution to our problems, I believe theywould be a tremendous step in the right direction and we should beginexploring them immediately.Many legislators, including myself, did not accept pay until the budgetwas passed and I believe this was the right thing to do. House Bill 1629,of which I am a co-sponsor, would apply that concept to every lawmaker and the governor. This legislation would deny pay and per diem paymentsfor all lawmakers and the governor if the June 30 deadline passes withouta new state budget in place. It would continue denying them pay until anew budget is enacted.One of the most troubling aspects of the recent budget impasse is thenegative impact it had on schools and social services that rely on statefunding to operate. If there is no state budget in place, these servicescannot function. With that in mind, I have co-sponsored House Bill 2014which would require that if a budget is not passed by the end of the fiscalyear on June 30, the previous year’s budget will become the budget for theupcoming year. This scenario is not an attractive one, but it does offer apowerful incentive to lawmakers to accomplish a very basic responsibilityto complete a spending and revenue plan by July 1.I am very interested in your views on how we can fix the budgetprocess. Please feel free to contact my district office or visit my Web siteat
RepMurt.com.
Helping Families with Special Needs Children
As an educator and an elected official, I have always had a strong interest in the care and quality of life of adults with special needs andheir parents. These individuals have been in the care of their parents all of their lives. Now, they are in their 50s or 60s, and they are in thecare of a parent who is in their 70s or even 80s.I believe we are not doing enough to help these families and I continue to be an outspoken advocate on their behalf. A number of mycolleagues from both sides of the aisle share that view, and together, we formed the Intellectual Disability Caucus to advocate legislationrelating to Pennsylvanians with intellectual disabilities.We agreed that since the issue of intellectual disabilities crosses party lines, so should lawmakers as we try to help individuals with thesedisabilities and the families who care for them.In the current legislative session, there are several pieces of legislation which would provide help to these families:
House Bill 1
would expand the number of eligible adults in the adultBasic program by accepting approximately 130,000 newpeople into the program. While not designed solely for adults with disabilities, it is available to any disabled adult who meetsthe eligibility requirements. This bill passed the House last year and is now awaiting action in the Senate.
Senate Bill 189
while not designed solely for adults with disabilities, would provide protection for eligible young adults withdisabilities. This bill was signed into law on June 10, 2009, as Act 4 of 2009. It allows a parent to retain a child on a health care policyup through and including the age of 29.
House Bill 245
would expand the scope of the Family Caregiver Support Program to include reimbursements for non-relativecaregivers and increases reimbursement levels.
House Bill 1319
would establish an Adult Protective Services program to be administered by the Department of PublicWelfare. This program would be designed to protect abused, neglected, exploited or abandoned adults between 18 and 59 yearsof age who have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
House Bill 1361
would establish a Family Caregiver Support Advisory Board within the Department of Public Welfare.
House Bill 826
would increase the reimbursement provided to caregivers under the Family Caregiver Support Act. Another bill,
House Bill 1247
introduced by Rep. Kate Harper (R-Montgomery), would eliminate the waiting list for housing and communityservices and establish a Bill of Rights for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. House Bill 1247 calls on the Department of Public Welfare to develop an action plan that will eliminate the emergency and critical segments of the waiting list by 2012.I sincerely believe caring for Pennsylvanians with intellectual disabilities is a legitimate and vital function of our state government. Thefact that these families do not have the political strength of the gaming or tobacco industries only makes them more worthy of my efforts.
Add a Comment