Orly Taitz – Reply to Opposition… USDC DC Case #10-151 RCLhttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=8667 Page 3 of 10
punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15years.
US attorneys’ actions in not prosecuting this matter goes beyond mere negligence, it falls within therealm of misprision of felony, compromising of felony and aiding and abetting commission of felony,predicate acts, which will tie in the above US attorneys to Mr. Obama and sufficient for RICO legalaction.These actions of Obama and US attorneys have exposed me to further severe emotional distress,assaults, insults, death threats, and numerous hate crimes relating to my legal actions, representing myclients and myself and trying to protect the public at large from this massive fraud committed byObama and currently aided and abetted by US attorneys.
2. As felonies were reported, the court itself cannot ignore those issues andobligated to investigate
Evidence reported in the complaint and the application for preliminary injunction provides affidavits of licensed investigators as well as Selective service official printout, which clearly indicate use of multiple social security numbers, social security fraud, identity theft, fraud as well as high likelihoodof a number of other white color crimes by the defendant. At this point if the court does not grant theapplication or dismisses the complaint, the court itself will be guilty of aiding and abetting all of theabove crimes and misprision of felonies. As such the court has no other alternative, but to proceed withthe discovery, and proceed expeditiously.3.
The court is entitled to obtain Defendant’s Records.
The defendant intentionally misrepresents the complaint by claiming that the plaintiff is not entitled tothe Defendant’s records quoting Freedom of Information Act.This is a case of Quo Warranto. The defendant is an attorney, who during the campaign representedhimself as a constitutional scholar and a constitutional professor. As such he is surely aware of the factthat Quo Warranto has existed for some 700 years before the Freedom of Information act was everenacted.I have requested that the Attorney General and US attorney fulfill their duties and verify Obama’squalifications under Quo Warranto. As they breached their duties, I am asking the court to grant me ExRelator Status, step in the shoes of these derelict US attorneys, who didn’t do their job, which we, thetax payers, have paid them to do. As the court grants me Ex Relator status, I will be entitled to obtainall the necessary records to prove or disprove Obama’s legitimacy. This shows that the Defendantsassertion that I have no Entitlement to records is an absurd and was brought to confuse Your Honor.
4. Defendant’s claim that my complaint is a non-justiciable political question, is acomplete absurdity and was brought to mislead Your Honor.
About a third of the brief, 4-5 pages is completely irrelevant, as those are devoted to the mechanismsof the elections and removal of the president from office. I have
never asked your Honor to removeMr. Obama from office.
All I have asked for, is discovery, and based on this discovery, a declaratoryrelief, declaring whether Mr. Obama has indeed qualified to office or not per Quo Waranto and per