You are on page 1of 50

REC4 6100_ETI 2.

2 20/07/05 15:24 Page 1

Economic and Technological Intelligence


(ETI) projects for SMEs – 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contract number Project Acronym

CT-2004-508563 DETECT-IT Big companies are opening their doors

CT-2004-508533 ECTIST Integrating clusters with similar needs

CT-2004-508559 FASHION NET A dedicated follower of fashion

CT-2004-508519 FASTER Fast-track access to European transport research

CT-2004-508547 FISH Fishing for information on FP6

CT-2004-508564 ITE Human factor brings hope to ailing textiles

CT-2004-508476 LINK A unique web of public and private networks

CT-2004-508507 MISMEC Multifaceted mechatronics

CT-2004-508695 NANOMAT Big help for nanotech

CT-2004-508505 NAoMITEC Small scale but high tech

CT-2004-508583 NATIBS Getting off to a good start in biotech

CT-2004-508520 PATENT Towards the multimedia future

CT-2004-508566 PLASTEAM Moulding plastics SMEs into European research

CT-2004-508683 PRODESTS Wasting away

CT-2004-508513 PRO-KNOWLEDGE Promoting joined-up European research

CT-2004-508500 RURAL-ETINET Widening the horizons of rural SMEs

CT-2004-508562 SHOES5000 Finding a better fit for EU footwear

CT-2004-508589 SMESFORFOOD A feast of innovation

CT-2004-508527 SMES GO LIFESCIENCES Matchmaker, matchmaker, make me a match

CT-2004-508721 STIMULATE Harnessing the power of trade associations

CT-2004-508508 SYNERGY The power of SYNERGY

CT-2004-508510 TALENT SCOUT A helping hand for biotech innovators

CT-2004-508590 WOMEN2FP6 FP6 for the other half

CT-2004-508617 WOODISM Stronger links for better business


REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 2

Big companies are opening their doors


DETECT-it

“The project puts SMEs in a ‘club’ An ETI project is bringing together extensive
where they can find qualified, on-the- European networks of intermediaries for small and
spot intermediaries.” medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and fostering transnational
links amongst all the parties. Under the leadership of EBN (European
Business and Innovation Centre Network), a network of business innovation
centres (BICs) across Europe is developing clusters of SMEs to prepare them for
participation in European research. Corporate leaders from mainstream industry are also taking
part to mentor the clusters.

The DETECT-it project encourages SMEs in specific sectors of indus- never been active in research. Therefore, as specialists in FP mech-
try to participate in European research, especially the Sixth anisms, they can offer powerful insights into how these innovative
Framework Programme (FP6). It targets technology-based SMEs in small businesses that would otherwise stay off the radar screen might
three sectors – IT, renewable energy, and food quality and safety. join in FP6 research activities.
It is mobilising a network of 30 BIC incubators in 15 EU countries
to foster SME participation in FP6, and especially in Integrated Perhaps the project’s most innovative contribution lies in the inte-
Projects and Networks of Excellence, with the support of appropri- gration of FP6 instruments, SME support bodies, and the SMEs them-
ate National Contact Points (NCPs) and Innovation Relay Centres selves, and the way different organisations are being involved. This
(IRCs). They are developing clusters of SMEs with similar technol- applies in particular to sizeable corporations since the project
ogy profiles and innovation needs corresponding to the designat- assumes that mentoring schemes from the large corporate partners
ed FP6 research areas, and identifying opportunities for participa- like British Telecom, Procter & Gamble, and Gaz de France can real-
tion in new and existing projects. ly provide the leverage to propel SMEs forward into research
activities. This makes sense, however, since most large corporations
The project consortium consists of 42 partners from 17 different coun- – whether technology-based or not – are increasingly outsourcing
tries, including the 30 BICs, and is coordinated by the EBN. During many of their research requirements. SMEs now have an opportu-
the course of the project, more than 1 000 SMEs will be screened nity to position themselves in the value chain of corporate outsourc-
and assessed for clustering. SMEs with well-defined research and ing mechanisms. This ‘network networking’ effect also applies to
technological innovation requirements and capabilities are preferred. the clever way EC intermediaries are co-operating for the benefit
The BIC partners oversee the clusters, while corporate leaders of SMEs and FP6 stakeholders.
from the private sector in each of the industry sectors offer them men-
toring services. Since SMEs generally find it difficult to fund research Long-term effects
activities, a number of financial support organisations are commit- The big company partners are opening up to all kinds of collabo-
ted to assisting the clusters. It is expected that these developed clus- rative ventures proposed by the SMEs. Many of the large corpo-
ters will eventually generate high-tech SME start-ups, building on rations are already involved in advanced DG Research instru-
the foundation of results from FP6 research projects. ments, such as technology platforms. It
appears that they do indeed
Forward propulsion provide a link to even
A network of FP6 experts in each of the three industry sectors, includ- the most recently
ing NCPs and technology brokers, guides the clusters of SMEs formed policy
towards appropriate FP6 research projects. At the beginning, this instruments. For
pool of experts concentrated on training and educating the BICs example, the
on all aspects of the current Framework Programme. The empha- presence of a
sis now is on identifying appropriate Integrated Projects (IPs) and
Networks of Excellence (NoEs) for SME participation.

This is a large and ambitious project, bringing together two exten-


sive networks – the leaders of IPs and NoEs, and the locally-based
innovative businesses organised by the BICs. The BICs’ core mis-
sion is to incubate small businesses and make them more innova-
tive. They have expanded over the last 20 years supporting inno-
vative businesses of all kinds. Many of their SME clients have
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 3

ETI–1

major multinational in the chemical industry has visibly cemented “Big companies are betting on
the commitment to the project of BICs, companies and technology clusters as the best way for
platforms in that field.
small businesses to move
A long-term goal of the project is to set up a sustainable mecha-
forward.”
nism to channel the BICs’ SME clients towards appropriate research
opportunities, with the help of the relevant NCPs as intermediaries.
In fact, improving NCP-BIC co-operation is seen as an important Project website
outcome of the project that will further benefit SMEs in the future. www.detect-it.org

Another important facet of DETECT-it is the development of region- Participants


al networking models for research in the new accession countries. 1 European Business and Innovation Centre Network (BE)
The project aims to overcome many of the obstacles preventing SMEs 2 Innovatie- en Technologiecentrum Kempen (BE)
in the new EU Member States from participating in FP6. This will 3 Société de Création d’Activités Nouvelles (BE)
be achieved by networking with FP6 experts, corporate players, 4 BIC Brno spol. s.r.o. (CZ)
financial support instruments, and NCPs and other SME interme- 5 BIC Ostrava s.r.o. (CZ)
diaries. The consequent research results will help create high-tech 6 BIC Plzen (CZ)
start-ups in these countries. 7 Hermia Business Development (FI)
8 CICOM Organisation (FR)
Project title 9 Thésame (FR)
A dedicated network of incubators to detect and favour SME par- 10 BIC Business and Innovation Centre Frankfurt (DE)
ticipation in FP6 (DETECT-it) 11 WISTA-MANAGEMENT GMBH (DE)
12 Business and Innovation Centre of Attika (EL)
Contract number 13 INNOSTART National Business and Innovation Centre (HU)
CT-2004-508563 14 Dublin Business Innovation Centre (IE)
15 South East Business & Innovation Centre Ltd (IE)
Duration 16 BIC LAZIO spa (IT)
30 months 17 Eurobic Abruzzo e Molise scrl (IT)
18 Promofirenze – Special Agency of the Chamber of Commerce
Global project cost of Florence (IT)
€ 1 985 000 19 Tecnopolis CSATA Scrl (IT)
20 Foundation Business Innovation Centre Twente (NL)
EC contribution 21 NET – Novas Empresas e Tecnologias, S.A. (PT)
€ 1 286 250 22 BIC Bratislava, spol. s.r.o. (SK)
23 CASSOVIA BIC s.r.o. (SK)
Contact person 24 BIC EURONOVA, S.A. (ES)
Mr Philippe Vanrie 25 Centro Europeo de Empresa e Innovacion de Ciudad Real (ES)
European Business and Innovation Centre Network (EBN) 26 CENTRO EUROPEO DE EMPRESAS INNOVADORAS DE VALEN-
168 Avenue de Tervuren CIA (ES)
1150 Bruxelles – Belgium 27 Cimtec – Valais (CH)
Tel: +32 2 772 8900 28 Birmingham Technology Ltd (UK)
Fax: +32 2 772 9574 29 Technology Enterprise Kent (UK)
pva@ebn.be 30 Pronovus Limited (UK)
www.ebn.be 31 Culminatum Ltd Oy (FI)
32 Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (FR)
33 Ubifrance (FR)
34 The Brussels Enterprise Agency (BE)
35 ZUPA PAOLO (IT)
36 Pôle Européen Agro alimentaire pour la Communication, la
Recherche, L’innovation et le Transfert de Technologies (FR)
37 Centro Sviluppo Spa (IT)
38 EuroScan Services ApS (DK)
39 INBIS Group PLC (LU)
40 British Telecom (UK)
41 Procter & Gamble Eurocor (BE)
42 Gaz de France (FR)
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 4

Integrating clusters with similar needs


EcTIST

“Competitiveness and business growth A German-led group of seven Euro Info Centres
will save jobs in the future.” (EICs) is helping small and medium-sized enterprises
(SMEs) in the field of surface technology to become involved
in European research projects. It encourages compatible SMEs to work
in clusters, and networks incubators that can foster their progress. It also assists
large companies and research organisations in finding project partners among SMEs
in this field. The EICs provide an extensive range of services to SMEs, most notably a large
pool of potential project partners throughout Europe. Other services include company visits,
workshops, screening project material, and help with submission of a written project proposal.

Surface technology is a leading-edge approach with applications ing countries that focus on successful research projects in surface
in many industrial sectors and, as such, is a popular subject for technology so as to provide SMEs with examples of best practice.
research. It is fast becoming very important to the competitiveness This whole exercise should give a better understanding of the
of SMEs in Europe. The major objective of the EcTIST (Economic and need for innovation between researchers, businesses, policy-mak-
Technological Intelligence in the field of Surface Technologies) ers and society in general.
project is to help SMEs participate in European research projects.
Therefore, it targets businesses and research institutes that are Extensive services
linked to surface technologies. Even very small SMEs can benefit, The broad experience of the EIC partners in helping SMEs of all
for example, by working as testers and implementers of research kinds allows them to take a many-sided view of a potential project.
project results. They can help SMEs and research organisations build their consor-
tia in a balanced way, using the most suitable partners. The EIC
The submission of a successful research proposal involves working network ranges widely across Europe, so EICs in other countries
through complex procedures, for which SMEs have neither sufficient may be able to find likely partners amongst their contacts. Thus, the
time nor resources. This ETI project can help them to become part- project could suggest potential SME partners to project coordina-
ners in projects, by providing all the relevant information as it tors of Specific Support Actions (SSA) and SME- led Integrated
becomes available and taking them, step by step, through the var- Projects (IPs).
ious search and application procedures. The smaller the SME, the
more this assistance is needed. EcTIST also aims to find SMEs that The EICs also help the research institutes – often the best sources of
have already been involved in previous Framework Programme (FP) good ideas for projects – by looking for SMEs to become partners
research projects to promote the current Sixth Framework Programme for projects. They take the profile of a company, which details its main
(FP6) to other SMEs in their region. business areas and know-how, and work out ways in which it might
participate. The profiles are entered in a database which is then dis-
Clustering together tributed through other SME-intermediary networks, such as the IRCs
The seven EcTIST consortium members are all EICs, a primary and CORDIS. Widely advertised, the profiles have a better chance
European information and problem-solving network for SMEs. The of catching the attention of a
partners are from France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Poland, Slovenia large company or
and Sweden. The host structures in which they are based are var- research institute
ied – Chambers of Commerce, research institutes, universities and looking for proj-
banks – so they offer a variety experience and ways of dealing with ect partners.
problems. They also operate simultaneously within other regional
and national networks, such as Innovation Relay Centres (IRCs).

The consortium aims to facilitate the creation of clusters of SMEs


with similar innovation needs. Therefore, EcTIST tries to identify suit-
able candidates for clusters as well as identifying and networking
incubators in various fields of surface technology. Expert groups will
study the national multipliers for SMEs in the appropriate industri-
al sectors. After this initial groundwork, the EcTIST team plans reg-
ular visits to SMEs to determine their needs, so that they can either
recommend appropriate instruments within FP6 or national and
regional programmes. Various events will be held in the participat-
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 5

ETI–1

“If a project is performed well, partners


At the beginning of EcTIST, the EIC partners made an overview of tend to keep in touch afterwards.”
relevant research programmes in the field of surface technology.
They now monitor relevant calls for proposals and are trying to estab-
lish a pool of potential project partners in Europe. They publish a
regular info-letter for SMEs giving the latest project developments,
and will hold workshops and information and partnering events to
consolidate the project’s progress. Eventually, once an SME decides
to join a research project, they advise on how to write a success-
ful proposal.

SMEs will benefit immediately from participating in FP6 projects,


since the development costs and risks undertaken are shared
among all the partners. International links to companies and
research institutions with similar interests generally pay off.
Experience in European projects often leads to long-term co-oper-
ation with the project partners. The research results should lead to
innovative improvements among SMEs, boosting their growth and
competitiveness.

Project title Contact person


Economic and Technological Intelligence in the field of Surface Ms Antje Schmerwitz
Technologies – EcTIST NBank- Investitions- und Förderbank Niedersachsen GmbH
Günther-Wagner-Allee 12-14
Contract number 30177 Hanover
CT-2004-508533 Germany
Tel: +495 113 0031-373
Duration Fax: +495 113 0031 11-373
36 months antje.schmerwitz@nbank.de
www.eic-hannover.de
Global project cost
€ 1 133 131 Project website
www.ectist.com
EC contribution
€ 906 504 Participants
1 Investitions- und Förderbank Niedersachsen GmbH (DE)
2 Azienda speciale CCIAA Milano – Euro Info Centre IT 351 (IT)
3 Agderforskning, EIC Kristiansand (NO)
4 The Upper Silesian Regional Development Agency Co. (PL)
5 UP-SRC Koper (SI)
6 CRCI of Upper Normandy (FR)
7 Euro Info Centre Jönköpings län AB (SE)

The EcTIST project partners.


REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 6

A dedicated follower of fashion


FASHION NET

”We want to include all sectors of the Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in
industry. Wider integration offers many the European fashion industry face a growing threat
possibilities.” from global competition, and need to innovate rapidly to add
value to their businesses. The Economic and Technological Intelligence
(ETI) project, Fashion Net, with 16 partners in eight countries, aims to
consolidate and extend the existing networks of intermediaries. The extended
networks should greatly facilitate the participation of SMEs in FP6 research projects. Fashion
Net promotes the formation of clusters of intermediaries Europe-wide, and also supports clusters of
SMEs at a local level. There are already two other ETI projects – Shoes5000 and ITE (Intelligent Textile
Environment) – networking in synergy with Fashion Net.

The fashion industry contributes strongly to the European economy, during the duration of the project. The actions of SMEs will also be
giving employment to about 3 million people. However, SMEs integrated and coordinated once they have joined up to an FP6
throughout the industry need to undergo dramatic innovative project proposal.
change if they are going to compete successfully on a global
scale. They already suffer from severe competition from Asian One of Fashion Net’s objectives is to promote transnational activ-
companies, and will face a major challenge in 2005 when a new ities and relationships by creating an effective European network
WTO agreement comes into force. From January 1, all EU quotas of intermediaries. At the same time, the project will operate at local
will be removed. This will mean that European trade protection in level, organising events close to individual clusters of SMEs.
the fashion industry will disappear completely, opening the way to
competition from international imports. This was a main motivation Shared opportunities
for setting up the Fashion Net project. It is intended to strengthen the various networks for exchanging
expertise and best practice, which will help boost the competitive-
Fashion Net aims to facilitate the access of SMEs in this sector to ness of small businesses. Therefore, networks are being linked
Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) research projects. It ranges among all the different intermediaries – industrial associations, incu-
greatly in scope, covering all types of business, from design to pro- bators, research organisations, and national contact points, as well
duction of clothing materials of all kinds. It also addresses SMEs as between clusters of SMEs themselves. This network of SME-
involved in associated activities, such as supply-chain management intermediaries forms the core of Fashion Net. Its primary role is to
and business development. Its main targets are those SMEs which encourage transnational innovation and technology transfer among
are already innovative to some degree – roughly half of the total European SMEs operating in the fashion business.
involved in the fashion business.
The wider the network, the greater number of activities will be car-
There are good reasons why SMEs need to participate and bene- ried out resulting in more benefits for those SMEs involved. This is why
fit from this ETI project. First, they are generally short of personnel the networking activities in Fashion Net have focused on clustered
who need to dedicate virtually all their time to coping with daily collaborations. There are already two other ETI projects networking
activities. Secondly, it is difficult for them to obtain information about with SMEs in clusters from Fashion Net –
potential research partnerships and how they might gain access to Shoes5000 (in the footwear
them. Fortunately, intermediary organisations can help greatly by industry) and ITE, both
taking their innovative ideas and formalising them in proposals for within FP6. This exten-
specific transnational collaborative projects. sive co-operation
should net many
Effective networks more SMEs
The idea behind Fashion Net was to promote the benefits of SME and intermedi-
involvement in FP6 projects right across Europe. This project is being
carried out by 16 partners in eight countries – Czech Republic,
France, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Romania, Spain and Turkey. The
tools used to analyse and disseminate information include a web-
based computer platform which contains four separate databases.
An information campaign is planned that will target 4 500 SMEs.
It will be implemented through two conferences, eight innovation
workshops and eight training sessions. In addition, 155 technolo- Luminex®, a non-reflective
gy audits and a number of best practice cases will be collected new fabric. © Luminex
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 7

ETI–1

“The first benefit is putting people in


ary organisations, even in countries not directly involved in the touch with each other.”
Fashion Net project. In fact, altogether there are 40 partners from
18 different countries involved in the three projects.

The enhanced networking activities will involve the exchange and


sharing of information via each other’s websites, communication
materials, workshops and seminars, and promotional activities.
Intermediary organisations are in contact with many potential proj-
ect partners for SMEs – for instance, this might be a relatively
unknown fashion department in a technical university in one of the
new Member States. The human element is emphasised in this net-
work-building exercise, since the mutual trust built up over time in
personal contacts between the respective parties and an interme-
diary greatly assists in welding a new partnership.

Project title Contact person


Network of intermediaries to foster transnational research and Dr Silvia Grandi
innovation in SMEs in the fashion industry system (FASHION NET) Istituto per la Promozione Industriale
Viale Maresciallo Pilsudski, 124
Contract number 00197 Rome
CT-2004-508559 Italy
Tel: +39 068 097 2215
Duration Fax: +39 068 097 2443
24 months grandi@ipi.it
www.ipi.it
Global project cost
€ 930 466 Project website
www.fashionnet.org
EC contribution
€ 697 589 Participants
1 Istituto per la Promozione Industriale (IT)
2 Hellenic Organisation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
and Handicraft (EL)
3 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
4 Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (FR)
5 ADEI Agencia de Desarrollo Económico e Innovación, S.L. (ES)
6 Small and Medium Industry Development Organisation (TR)
7 Initiative, Cité & Développement (FR)
8 CITER-Centro Informazione Tessile dell’Emilia Romagna (IT)
9 Tecnotessile-Società Nazionale di Ricerca Tecnologica r.l. (IT)
10 Lithuanian Apparel and Textile Industry Association (LT)
11 INOTEX Ltd (CZ)
12 Institut Français Textile Habillement (FR)
13 Clothing Textile and Fibre Technological Developments (EL)
14 Institutul National de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Textile si
Pielarie (RO)
15 Asociación para la Incorporación de las Nuevas Tecnologías
en la Empresa (ES)
16 Asociación de Investigación de la Industria Textil (ES)

Luminex® integrates luminous fibres developed using knowledge


gained in the field of sub-nuclear physics. © Luminex
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 8

Fast-track access to European transport research


FASTER

“Europe is keen for SMEs to get involved in Transportation is one of the pillars of
research and technological development. Europe’s internal trade, so it must remain competitive
Faster will really help them to access through innovation and business growth. Europe supports
the many opportunities.”
research in this area, but SMEs struggle to participate. The Faster project
aims to increase their involvement. Faster will inform SMEs of research and
technological development opportunities, assess their suitability for participation and
match their needs and skills to suitable projects and partners – all for free. Greater SME
representation on projects should stimulate innovation and technology transfer throughout the
entire transport community, and ensure that it continues to play a key role in Europe’s economy.

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the transport sector The Faster consultants will analyse companies’ research ideas and
and related business areas need to be at the forefront of innova- suggested topics and identify suitable themes for future European
tion, yet they do not have the resources – financial or human – to projects. Where projects appear viable, Faster can match compa-
embark on ‘risky’ research projects. They even find it hard to tap nies to potential partners, give advice on the best FP6 instruments
into European research funding, and tend to be poorly represent- for their proposals, and help SMEs develop their funding applica-
ed in European Union Sixth Framework Projects (FP6) projects, espe- tions. This level of service could not be achieved without Faster which
cially the large-scale Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence. gathers experts from across Europe who, by working together, are
Consequently, these SMEs risk losing a competitive edge or becom- able to see ‘the big picture’ and identify links between SMEs in
ing a weak link in the transportation value chain. different Member States.

Fast forward SME ambassadors


The FASTER project intends to correct this situation and help Faster hopes to integrate appropriate companies into existing or
increase SME representation in projects towards the Commission’s soon-to-launch FP6 research projects. The incorporation of SMEs into
target level of 15%. Faster brings together a variety of actors up-and-running projects is a particular challenge, but the Faster
involved in the transport sector. They include port authorities, trans- assessment methodology is designed to identify ‘SMEs of excellence’
port industry associations with access to a large pool of target SMEs which have a lot to offer and will be able to meet their commitments.
from across Europe, and specialist consultancy organisations offer-
ing the small firms free, core advisory and coaching services. The These companies, at the forefront of innovation, stand to gain
consortium also includes a number of agencies involved in support- tremendous competitive and business advantage and will consequent-
ing SME involvement in R&D, and a marketing and communications ly invigorate their local transport environment. Furthermore, by mix-
company which is coordinating the project’s entire communications ing with complementary and competitive companies from around
and dissemination strategy. Europe they may also find ways to expand their markets, form
alliances, and develop a vision beyond the immediate worries of
In order to help SMEs get actively involved in European RTD initia- cash flow and survival.
tives, the project will follow a step-by-step methodology which
aims to integrate leading SMEs into appropriate FP6 projects. But the impact of Faster will
Initially, the partners intend to contact a large number of SMEs and go far beyond the ‘select
inform them about FASTER and the availability of its free services. few’. For the majori-
This should stimulate interest from a significant number of compa- ty of SMEs, Faster
nies which the Faster experts will profile to get a clearer picture of will simply raise
each company’s RTD needs, capabilities and ideas. Such profiling awareness of
will highlight the SMEs with the greatest potential to participate in the impor-
FP6 projects – often those companies with prior experience of
conducting research, or with strong university links. They will also
undergo a technology audit to assess whether they have the nec-
essary infrastructure and resources to participate in FP6 research.

The European
transportation sector
is a pillar of internal
trade – and must innovate
to remain competitive.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 9

ETI–1

“Thanks to our network and combined


tance of innovation – and the possibility of research participation. expertise, we are able to match SMEs to
Some of these companies will go away, refine their ideas, and come
European projects and to partners
back stronger, ready to face the challenge of FP6 collaboration.
with whom they might
In the meantime, those firms that do become FP6 project partners collaborate in
through Faster will give a voice to all European SMEs in the trans- the future.”
port sector and related business areas. Their research needs will
be heard and projects will begin to take them into account. As a
result, SMEs will be strengthened, preserving employment for mil-
lions of employees and ensuring that European transportation
remains competitive for the future.

Project title Project website


Fostering Alliances for Sustainable Transport in European Research www.fasterproject.org
(FASTER)
Participants
Contract number 1 Horama Marketing and Engineering Services (EL)
CT-2004-508519 2 Innova (IT)
3 Mediterranean Ports Community (ES)
Duration 4 The Alliance of Maritime Regional Interests in Europe (BE)
30 Months 5 Central European Initiative (IT)
Global project cost 6 TUHH-Technologie GmbH (DE)
€927 316 7 Agend bruxelloise pour l’entreprise (BE)
8 AID Marketing and Communication (BE)
EC contribution
€702 846

Contact person
Mauro Bianchi
Technical Support for European Organisations Sprl
8, Avenue Paul Vanden Thoren
1160 Brussels
Belgium
Tel: +32 2 230 1090
Fax: +32 2 230 1377
screening@fasterproject.org

The transportation sector and related business areas involves many SMEs struggling
to access European research funding.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 10

Fishing for information on FP6


FISH

“Demonstration activities give SMEs a Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in


taste of what R&D is all about.” the fisheries and marine resources industries are
constantly looking for ways to be competitive. They search
internationally, visiting suppliers, business associates and trade fairs to
seek out new strategies and technologies. But what they rarely do is participate
in research projects which offer them sustainable innovative improvements to their
businesses. In the FISH project, a consortium of 12 SME intermediaries is raising awareness among
SMEs about EC-funded large-scale research projects. Partners promote examples of the successful
integration of SMEs from this industrial sector into FP6 proposals, which should encourage others to try.

The FISH project is targeting the majority of SMEs within the fish- took place in November, in France, where FISH partners met with
ing industry and its ancillary services, even those with minimal tech- representatives from approximately 20 companies, leading to
nological development. The first objective is to increase their under- intensive discussions among them to identify their needs and take
standing and acceptance of applied research as a means of their profiles.
improving their core business over the longer term. Such awareness-
raising is carried out in collaboration with national contact points Some SMEs in the fishing and allied industries, especially certain
and national organisations for fisheries and marine resources. more innovative firms, are already involved in FP6 Integrated
Through national and European stimulation activities, project part- Projects (IPs). However, the majority of SMEs should at least be aware
ners inform as many SMEs as possible about Sixth Framework of research projects. One FISH initiative is designed to convince
Programme (FP6) research activities. some firms to take part in the demonstration activities of IPs – a rel-
atively easy first step. Many of them could qualify for these demon-
The project takes this informative stage a big step further, with per- stration tasks, and thereby experience a first taste of what transna-
sonal visits to companies that express interest in order to identify tional research projects really entail. This would set them off on a
and analyse their technology needs. The aim is to visit a total of learning curve leading them to a greater awareness of the possi-
480 SMEs, make detailed assessments of 125 of them, and even- bilities and eventually, it is hoped, to involvement in a full-scale
tually to have a total of 24 participating in EU research projects. research project.
The emphasis is on taking positive action to find the right SMEs and
the right project concepts. The pan-European dimension of FISH is Imaginative innovation
important because it means that the SMEs have a much better chance There is a good deal of technical know-how required in the fisheries
of finding optimal research partners than if they had restricted their and allied industries – particularly in relation to exporting, logis-
search to domestic organisations. tics, processing, filleting and freezing. The SMEs are generally aware
that they need to innovate to remain competitive. To do so, they are
Established networks forced to think internationally which means tapping into a reliable
FISH is linked to other national innovation programmes, and to the network of contacts in the industry. An SME in fish processing, for
EC-funded Innovation Relay Centres (IRCs) across Europe. The example, has a great deal of knowledge to
idea was to collaborate in particular with the IRC network so that share with others. Through a
a project can start from a base of considerable experience and good network of contacts, very
contacts amongst SMEs in this industrial sector. In fact, nine of the innovative solutions
12 partners are IRCs – the remaining three are consulting compa- can be found. For
nies with their own contacts among SMEs. The consultancies offer instance, a fish
expertise in facilitating the entry of SMEs into project consortia. processor in
Norway has
The numerous face-to-face meetings between project partners and
SMEs are enabled by the extensive IRC networks. The SME profiles
developed at these meetings are entered into databases for analy-
sis and matching with possible partners. Personal contact with
potential project coordinators is also very important as it is an oppor-
tunity to actively promote those SME profiles and to foster mutual
trust. One FISH national stimulation action was held in Norway in
November 2004. Over 100 people attended the meeting, 72 of
whom came from SMEs. A FISH European stimulation action also A Norwegian salmon farm.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 11

ETI–1

“Personal contact is very important if you


found it worthwhile to send freshly caught frozen cod to be fillet- want to sell company profiles to
ed in China where labour costs are much lower than in the Europe.
prospective project partners.”
The fish are then returned for distribution and sale in Europe.
Naturally, this has meant introducing major logistical and techno-
logical innovative changes in the company to ensure that overall
costs remain low, and that the schedules between continents are
maintained.

The biggest area of potential innovation that remains largely unex-


plored is probably research. The problem is generally one of
access, which is why FISH aims to break down the barriers between
SMEs and research-led organisations. This will be done through var-
ious analyses and auditing schemes based on earlier EC-funded proj-
ects and national technology transfer programmes.

Project title Contact person


Facilitating Innovation for Sustainable Fisheries and Marine Mr John A. Bjorgen
Resources (FISH) SINTEF
S.P. Andersens vei 5
Contract number 7465 Trondheim
CT-2004-508547 Norway
Tel: +47 7359 6958
Duration Fax: +47 7459 1299
24 months john.a.bjorgen@sintef.no
www.sintef.no
Global project cost
€ 688 384 Participants
1 SINTEF (NO)
EC contribution 2 The Technological Institute of Iceland (IS)
€ 516 291 3 National Documentation Centre (EL)
4 Cyprus Institute of Technology (CY)
5 INNOVA S.p.A. (IT)
6 Inovamais SA (PT)
7 Innovación, Desarrollo y Transferencia de Tecnologia, S.A.
(ES)
8 Bretagne Innovation (FR)
9 Osrodek Przetwarzania Informacji (PL)
10 ALMI Företagspartner Uppsala AB (S)
11 SENTER (NL)

Farming salmon in Norway.


REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 12

Human factor brings hope to ailing textiles


ITE

“ITE is about breaking down the barriers Fierce global competition and the recent
that limit innovation.” abolition of import quotas have left Europe’s textile
industry in a fragile state. Increasing its competitiveness calls
for continued innovation – to improve efficiency, add value and access
markets. But limited awareness of new developments and a basic preoccupation
with the daily grind of earning a living are restricting the sector’s willingness and ability
to innovate. The ITE (Intelligent Textile Environment) project combines expertise from 22 partners
across 16 countries to promote both innovation per se, and the opportunities offered to small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by the European Union’s R&D programmes. The project hopes to reach
some 9 000 textiles enterprises across Europe.

Employing around 2 million people in some 177 000 enterprises Shifting priorities
– most of which are small and medium-sized enterprises – Europe’s While BenTex proved a success in many ways, it also identified a
textile industry is a critical one. But, like any sector dominated by critical barrier to its approach: the human factor. The ITE project
SMEs, the business of facilitating informed management decisions aims to capitalise on these findings to improve future project
across a large number of small companies is a big one. Can we achievements. Recognising that it is people who develop and
improve quality without adding to costs? How do we deal with new absorb knowledge, and people who adopt and adapt innovations,
legislative demands? How can we increase market penetration? the new project will target SME personnel. Through seminars and
Small businesses with limited capacity really need to know what workshops, as well as by visiting companies, the ITE consortium will
works elsewhere – because reinventing the wheel is not a compet- engage real people – not just companies – in the issue of innova-
itive option. tion. By raising awareness of relevant EU-funded projects, and by
training individuals to participate in such projects, the ITE group
SMEs need two things: better ways to address common concerns, hopes to increase awareness of – and openness towards – new
and greater access to the scientific, technical and commercial developments.
intelligence that allows them to develop more successful business
strategies. The ITE project hopes to contribute to textile SMEs in both To do this, the ITE consortium is bringing together experts in areas
respects – by improving information flows on the latest innovations, ranging from quality control and product certification to cross-bor-
and by engaging more enterprises in relevant research and devel- der technology and knowledge transfer. Networking activities will
opment initiatives. be used to attract SMEs and link them with researchers working on
the technological or business solutions that they need. They will also
The ITE consortium plans to build on the legacy of the earlier help to improve dissemination of current benchmarking methods and
BenTex project. Also funded by European Union Framework best practices. The hope is that by improving links between enter-
Programmes, BenTex focused largely on benchmarking as a key deci- prise and research, European R&D can benefit from the SMEs’ expert-
sion-making tool. Addressing criteria such as size, production ise, networks and perspectives, while the companies themselves can
processes, distribution channels, markets, management issues and become more receptive to taking up the new developments emerg-
competitive tactics (including innovation, quality, service and cost), ing from ongoing research.
BenTex attracted participation from around 300 European SMEs.
Managers exchanged their experiences and methodologies, iden-
tified and shared best practices, and many took on new innovations
to help improve production. The project also opened the way to
developing 18 co-operative research proposals to address key issues
identified by SMEs.

The ITE consortium


brings research and
business together to break
down barriers to innovation.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 13

ETI–1

Building bridges “Scientists learn from business and vice


ITE is basically about breaking down barriers – to communication, versa. Research becomes more
to the exchange of ideas and information, and to innovation. The pro-
targeted and the uptake of
ject’s organisers are certainly hoping to overcome these hurdles in
the textile sector, but they are also hoping to actually cross bound-
findings improves.”
aries between sectors. One key goal is to stimulate the development
of a cross-sectoral network of experts able to act as advocates and
brokers for new ideas throughout Europe’s SME community.

ITE hopes that focusing on the human element in innovation – and Contact person
on best practices for maximising human potential in all aspects of Nena Malliou
innovation – can help to break down conventional cultural, sectoral Clothing Textile and Fibre Technological Developments SA
and geographic divides. It is looking to cross the boundaries 4 El. Venizelou
between industry and science; between old and new EU members, 17676 Kallithea/Athens
and between one sector and another. It is planning to encourage Greece
transnational and trans-sector learning. And it is hoping that break- Tel: +30 210 923 4932
ing down these divisions can eventually contribute to widespread Fax: +30 210 923 5603
economic success by stimulating more and better jobs and creat- nmalliou@etakei.gr
ing greater social cohesion. In a region of such great diversity in
culture and experience, this is an ambitious project – but one that Project website
could fundamentally change the way that European SMEs are www.etakei.gr/ite
able to compete in an increasingly global market.
Participants
Project title 1 Business and Project Management (EL)
Intelligent Textile Environment (ITE) 2 Tecnotessile – Società Nazionale di Ricerca Tecnologica r.l. (IT)
3 Centro d’Informazione Tessile dell’Emilia Romagna (IT)
Contract number 4 Asociación de Investigación de la Industria Textil (ES)
CT-2004-508564 5 The Research – Development National Institute for Textile and
Leather (RO)
Duration 6 Institut fuer Textil und Verfahrenstechnik Denkendorf der
24 months Deutschen Institute fuer Textil und Faserforschung Stuttgart (DE)
7 Istituto per la Promozione Industriale (IT)
Global project cost 8 Lietuvos Inovaciju Centras (LT)
€1 154 558 9 Inotex Ltd. (CZ)
10 Institute of textile Architecture (PL)
EC contribution 11 Innovatext Textile Engineering and Testing Institute (HU)
€895 751 12 Applied Research and Communications Fund (BG)
13 Latvian Technological Centre (LV)
14.Firenze Tecnologia – Azienda speciale della Camera di
Commercio di Firenze (IT)
15 Turkish Textile Employer’s Association (TR)
16 Cyprus Institute of Technology (CY)
17 Vutch-Chemitex (SK)
18 Integrated Resources Management Company Ltd. (MT)
19 Centro Tecnologico das Industrias Textil o do Vestuario de
Portugal (PT)
20.Steinbeis Europa Zentrum des Steinbeis Stiftung für
Wirtschaftsforderung (DE)
21 Agencia de Inovação – Inovação Empresarial e
Transferencia de Tecnologia (PT)

New textiles with novel


properties.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 14

A unique web of public and private networks


LINK

“Unitl now the European intermediaries A consortium of small and medium-sized


have tended to work in isolation.” enterprise (SME) intermediaries from both the public and
private sectors is collaborating in the LINK project. It is offering
SMEs in the plastics and electronics industries a range of support
services to facilitate their access to the Sixth Framework Programme’s
Integrated Projects and Specific Targeted Projects (IPs and STREPs). LINK identifies high
and medium technology SMEs then matches them with the right project. It also shows project
coordinators how these particular SMEs can fulfil project needs by bringing in additional expertise. Thus,
the SME and its project partners meet in a relationship based on their mutual best commercial interests.

LINK partners undertake to promote the benefits of IP and STREP be hard to understand how an SME-national contact point could
projects to SMEs, and the positive attributes of SMEs as potential communicate freely with a private consulting firm, due to the pos-
partners to the project coordinators. There are 20 participants in sible conflicts of interest. But consulting firms are important as they
total in LINK, from 14 different Member States and one Associated have their own networks and are often in contact with large num-
State. About two-thirds come from the public sector and one-third bers of SMEs. Despite the difficulties, the organisation of LINK enables
from the private sector. They are all experienced and effective a representative from each of the main networks to oversee vari-
European SME intermediaries – National Contact Points, Innovation ous smaller networks operating under its umbrella. Regular meet-
Relay Centres, business and innovation centres, trade associa- ings are held in small groups at first, then the agreements and under-
tions, registered trade organisations, as well as private consulting standings reached are disseminated to the other networks. This
firms. scheme has been found to work very well so far, and it is hoped
that it will expand a lot further.
The so-called ‘broad-band’ support LINK offers is actually the
awareness-raising of mutual benefits SMEs and its project partners Bright future
can expect from co-operation. ‘Narrow-band’ support refers to very SMEs are bombarded with information from all kinds of network
detailed, one-to-one assistance provided in the all-important match- services, each offering something different but, by necessity, limit-
ing and integration processes required to set up the project part- ed in choice, scope and support. Now that this significant network
nerships. Project proposals can be registered, together with SME of networks has been set up, life is becoming much easier for the
needs, on the LINK database and matched against profiles of all SMEs. By using this Economic and Technological Intelligence (ETI)
LINK-registered SMEs to find the best fit. The next step is for a LINK project as a stepping stone into FP6, they will be able to develop
partner to help the SME identified as an optimal partner through their own IPR-protected technology, enabling them to add value to
the required project participation procedures while, at the same time, their products and services. It should help to make them more
liaising with the project coordinator. The SME is thus integrated in competitive with their counterparts outside the European Union, in
the project with a minimum of difficulty, and can function immedi- countries with low labour costs.
ately as a direct participant in core research activities.

A successful start
It would normally be very difficult for SMEs to gain access to IPs –
and to a lesser extent STREPs – in FP6, since these are large proj-
ects with multinational companies as partners. SMEs generally
have very few contacts with major companies, which do not usu-
ally recognise them as potential project partners. In any case,
small businesses rarely have enough time or resources available to
search around and create their own projects. This is where LINK
comes in. To begin with, its website offers SMEs automatic profil-
ing and matching facilities that tap into the resources of this large
web of networks. Enterprises can either log on and feed in data them-
selves, or ask a project assistant to help them enter their data.

One of LINK’s major initial achievements was to establish a com-


Advanced injection
mon understanding of how project partners from both the public
moulding technology.
and private sectors could work well together. For instance, it might © Pera
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 15

ETI–1

“We have already agreed ways of


Another novelty, an ‘intelligent data system’ which makes use of maximising our effectiveness for our
dynamic profiling techniques, helps to implement the LINK objec-
SME customers.”
tives. This network aims to generate a significant number of SME
participants in IPs/STREPs. The final target is to enable the partic-
ipation of at least 65 additional SMEs in IPs and STREPs – for exam-
ple, 5% of additional SME participation in such projects, each with
a value typically around € 20 million.

Plastics and electronics are the two areas of industry selected as


prime targets for LINK because they complement each other in many
ways, including innovation potential. In fact, together they are
covered by five of the seven FP6 priority thematic areas. In future,
it is expected that LINK will become the foundation for an even more
widespread web of networks that will benefit SMEs across a wide
range of industries.
Contact person
Project title Mr Mick Parmar
Leverage SME Intermediary NetworK Integrating Private and Public Pera Innovation Limited
Sector Intermediary Networks to More Effectively LINK SMEs into Pera Innovation Park, Nottingham Road
Integrated Projects (LINK) LE13 0PB Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire
United Kingdom
Contract number Tel: +44 168 4501 501
CT-2004-508476 Fax: +44 166 4501 589
mick.parmar@pera.com
Duration www.pera.com
24 months
Project website
Global project cost www.link-eu.org
€ 877 890
Participants
EC contribution 1 Pera Innovation Ltd (UK)
€ 845 402 2 Pro Support B.V. (NL)
3 Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (FR)
4 The Brussels Enterprise Agency (BE)
5 European Business and Innovation Centre Network (BE)
6 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angerwandten
Forschung (DE)
7 AIMPLAS – Instituto Tecnologico del Plastico (ES)
8 Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus (FI)
9 Innovages Fomento de la Innovacion (ES)
10 ALMA Consulting Group Ltd (IL)
11 HLP Developpement (FR)
12 Agência de Inovaçao S.A. – Inovação Empresarial e
Transferencia de Tecnología (PT)
13 Hungarian Science and Technology Foundation (HU)
14 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
15 Latvian Technological Centre (LV)
16 Cracow University of Technology (PL)
17 CATT Innovation Management GmbH (AT)
18 D’Appolonia S.p.A. (IT)
19 Fédération Plasturgie Activités (FR)
20 Fachverband Elektronik-Design e.V. (DE)

Resin fibres being pushed, rather


than pulled as in extrusion. © Pera
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 16

Multifaceted mechatronics
MISMEC

“We can help SMEs seeking projects, or Innovation in mechatronics relies on bringing
projects that need SMEs – it works both together a wide range of skills in mechanics, electronics
ways.” and information technology. Some of the key requirements for
innovation can be found in a variety of small companies which may
be unaware that their expertise could be useful in mechatronics research. The
MISMEC project is locating SMEs that could make contributions to mechatronics
research and helping them to become involved in larger research projects funded by the Sixth
Framework Programme. As part of this work, MISMEC is developing some new working practices to
help widely dispersed SMEs to work together and maintain the networks that can drive innovation.

When mechanical engineering combines with electronics and extensive network of research and commercial contacts the partners
computing it forms the field of ‘mechatronics’, a diverse sector cov- have developed over the years.
ering a vast range of applications. Industrial and domestic appli-
ances, aircraft, motor vehicles and all those applications where com- SMEs that are candidates for assistance are being identified
puter software controls moving parts can have elements of through a series of awareness actions, including seminars, work-
mechatronics at their core. Therefore, it is considered as a central shops and web-based promotions designed to instruct SMEs about
aspect of modern technology, so research in mechatronics is cru- the services available and get them thinking about the possibilities
cial for building the technology of the future. of becoming involved. The partners then conduct technology audits
to identify SMEs with clear potential to participate in FP6 research
The MISMEC project is helping European small and medium-sized programmes. This involves assessing their existing technological
enterprise (SMEs) with expertise in this area to understand and take capacities, as well as future needs. The partners are also working
advantage of research opportunities within the Sixth Framework pro- directly with the coordinators of new and ongoing FP6 projects to
gramme (FP6), especially those being offered by the new Integrated explore the opportunities for drawing SMEs into existing projects
Projects and Networks of Excellence. Such large collaborative or new project proposals.
projects create high hurdles for SMEs wishing to join in, so the kind
of help offered by MISMEC can be crucial. By their very nature, Once MISMEC has identified an SME with good potential for get-
many SMEs are isolated companies working in their own small geo- ting involved in a research programme, one of the partners will work
graphical and technological niches. There is an important job to closely with the SME to explain how the Framework Programme
be done in introducing them to the wider picture and adding their works and give them the help they need to become part of a well-
needs and ideas for innovation to the work of European research structured proposal. The SMEs have very different experiences
programmes. and needs, so the help the project provides must be carefully tai-
lored to each company’s specific requirements.
The SMEs being targeted by the MISMEC project are largely those
that use mechatronics in their work, or can input expertise into the The project goal is to assist at least 270 SMEs, leading to partici-
mechatronics sector, rather than being pure mechatronics compa- pation by some of them in at least 70 FP6 project proposals. They
nies. The sector is so wide and varied that it depends on the skills can participate in research projects as coordinators and main driv-
of many different types of enterprise. So the project is trying to bring ers, research partners, partners to influ-
a range of companies involved in information technology and ence long-term objectives within
electronics together into larger mechatronic research projects. a specific research theme,
and/or as partners for
Mix and match take-up measures.
The seven MISMEC partners are all designated European Innovation
Relay Centres. These are companies, associations or other institutes
that spend a great deal of their time trying to match up requirements
for innovation in their local region with innovative technologies across
Europe, while also helping to distribute innovations developed in
their own regions. Their time is devoted to matching technological
problems with solutions.
Simulation and
visualisation are among the
The process of identifying who is writing FP6 proposals and which
many cross-border areas
SMEs may be able to participate in them draws heavily on the involving mechatronics.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 17

ETI–1

Best practice “For an SME new to research it is a big


A key part of the MISMEC project is to develop new working prac- step – that’s why we are there to help
tices to assist in the general process of networking SMEs together
them.”
into collaborative groups. One of these comprises a new internal
management tool. This is a web application for following up proj-
ect results, activities, company and FP6 project profiles, and the sta-
tus of and interlinkage between these profiles. The tool is particu-
larly helpful for large consortia working with numerous clients who
are involved in many projects. Other practices involve the use of
wide-ranging web-based conferencing and events that enable
SMEs to meet and talk in ways that can throw up new ideas and
opportunities for collaboration.

The work of the project will assist the participating SMEs to become
more competitive and give them opportunities to develop and cre-
ate the jobs and new technologies Europe requires. By bringing var-
ious SMEs with different expertise together, these small players can
become involved in larger research projects that they could never
manage alone.

Project title Contact person


New Methods for Involving SMEs in Mechatronics sectors in FP6 Mr Max Maupoix
(MISMEC) IVF Industrial Research and Development Corporation
Argongatan 30
Contract number 431 53 Mölndal
CT-2004-508507 Sweden
Tel: +46 3170 66193
Duration Fax: +46 3127 6130
36 months max.maupoix@ivf.se
www.mismec.nu
Global project cost
€ 1 160 244 Participants
1 IVF Industrial Research and Development Corporation (SE)
EC contribution 2 Steinbeis Stiftung für Technologie Transfer (DE)
€ 972 224 3 Welsh Development Agency (UK)
4 MATIMOP, Israeli Industry Center for R&D (IL)
5 MSI – Institute of the Lithuanian Scientific Society (LT)
6 CECCP – Centro Estero Camere Commercio Piemontesi (IT)
7 Help-Forward Network/Diktyo PRAXI (EL)

Mechatronics is a union of
overlapping sectors. © IVF
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 18

Big help for nanotech


NANOMAT

“We are putting western know-how and The Nanomat project provides training and
experience at the service of the eastern innovation services to help SMEs working with
countries.” nanotechnologies to become more innovative and involved in
EU-funded programmes. It is especially targeted at small companies
from the new Member States and associated candidate countries. The size
of EU projects and the administrative aspects can seem daunting to these SMEs. The
key role of Nanomat is to show them the potential advantages of collaborative EU research
and help them link into good projects that suit them. In addition to the direct benefits coming from
any research they get involved in, SMEs can gain commercial advantages by becoming part of networks that
were previously closed to them.

Nanotechnology is technology at the very small scale – the scale The Nanomat project has three main areas of activity, which can
of atoms, molecules and tiny multi-molecular structures. The sector be described as training, technology-watch and Sixth Framework
takes its name from the nanometre which is one billionth of a Programme (FP6) participation.
metre (10-9 m). This technology of the very small is predicted to have
a very big future, with potential applications across the full spec- The first of these is providing tailor-made training in economic
trum of technology from healthcare to manufacturing, and comput- and technological intelligence activities to selected SMEs. More
ing to cosmetics. However, as with any technology in its infancy, specifically, the training covers three topics: technology watch and
it is hard to predict what the most useful applications will be and business intelligence; innovation management and benchmarking;
where they may come from. It is important to draw small and and technology exploitation and technology marketing. The train-
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from across the expanded European ing sessions are being held in each of the five Eastern European
Union into Europe’s nanotechnology research effort. The Nanomat countries in the partnership. The local partner hosts these events which
project is designed to help SMEs, especially from the new and can- are usually spread over two days. Overall, this training is helping
didate Member States, to become involved in collaborative research to make SMEs from NMS and the ACC more aware of the oppor-
programmes. tunities for funding, collaborative research and commercial activ-
ity in the EU at large.
The ten project partners comprise five institutions from new Member
States and associated candidate countries, and five from Western A careful watch
European Member States. This allows the Western partners with con- The second activity is to provide technology watch services and tech-
siderable experience of EU research programmes to transfer their nology audits to selected SMEs. This involves assessing the specif-
knowledge to the other five. SMEs from countries without a long tra- ic needs and abilities of each company and providing ongoing
dition of involvement in the EU can thus begin to gain the benefits research to identify opportunities for collaboration with other com-
on offer and also contribute their own specialist expertise. The knowl- panies and institutions across the EU. In assessing the current sta-
edge transfer is two-way, with the new Member States and asso- tus of each company, the project can also give advice on how to
ciated candidate countries helping the Western partners to learn develop best practices and respond to future development needs.
about the expertise and opportunities available outside their usual
sphere of operation. The third activity is to pro-
mote the participation
Inside information of SMEs directly,
The partners include a broad range of specialised companies, train- especially from
ing institutions, consultancies, universities and enterprise promotion the new
specialists. Each has an extensive database of SMEs in their local- Member States
ity that might benefit from participation in EU-funded research pro-
grammes, and may have specific skills to bring to new projects. The
partners use this inside knowledge to identify a range of SMEs to
offer the project’s services to. The incentive for the SMEs, in addi-
tion to the eventual benefits of any research, is that the EU offers
many potential business partners with whom they might never
make contact without Nanomat or similar initiatives. Joining EU-wide
networks can be the first and most important stage of significant- Nanotechnology
manipulates matter at
ly broadening the range of such SMEs’ commercial opportunities. the scale of individual
atoms. © IBM
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 19

ETI–1

“FP6 offers SMEs in the new Member


and the associated candidate countries, in FP6 research and tech- States great opportunities for putting
nological development activities. SMEs with particularly good
their good ideas into practice.”
ideas are offered a consultation service guiding them on how to
participate in a wide range of RTD projects, including Cooperative
Research Projects, Collective Research Projects, Specific Targeted
Research Projects, Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence.
The partnership can offer support from the stage of having a gen-
eral idea, right through the process of finding appropriate partners
and drawing up a finished project proposal.

During the project, which lasts for 30 months, the partners plan to
disseminate information to 500 SMEs, train a selected 300, pro-
vide 200 of these with customised technological intelligence serv-
ices, perform 120 company technology audits, and help up to 100
SMEs become part of new project proposals for EU RTD funding.

Project title Contact person


A targeted action to encourage the participation of SMEs in FP6, Mrs Paula Galvão
in the nanotechnologies and nanomaterials fields (NANOMAT) Inova Europe Sarl
15 Rue de la Chapelle
Contract number 1325 Luxembourg City
CT-2004-508695 Luxembourg
Tel: +352 269 23755
Duration Fax: +352 269 23762
30 months p.galvao@innova-europe.lu
www.innova-europe.lu
Global project cost
€ 1 116 710 Project website
www.innova-europe.lu/nanomat
EC contribution
€ 911 321 Participants
1 Innova Europe Sarl (LU)
2 Steinbeis Europa Zentrum (DE)
3 EUROQUALITY (FR)
4 BIC Bratislava Ltd (SK)
5 Puskas Tivadar Alipitvany – Institute of International Technology
(HU)
6 Politechnika Wroclawska – Centre for Technology Transfer (PL)
7 Inova Pro, s.r.o. (CZ)
8 Politehnica University of Bucharest – Centre for Advanced
Technologies (RO)
9 Fundación para el Conocimiento Madrimasd (ES)
10 SENTER/EG-Liaison (NL)

Silicon fabrication technology is already


approaching the nano-scale. © CEA-LETI
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 20

Small scale but high tech


NAoMITEC

“Networking is the key to the success of The NAoMITEC project is working with small and
NAoMITEC.” medium-sized enterprises in the micro- and
nanotechnology arena in 12 countries to identify those most
suitable to participate in Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence.
The ETI partners can give selected SMEs the advice and support required to
join in these large transnational projects. This opens up new opportunities for
collaboration and commercialisation that SMEs would otherwise find it difficult to break into
if left to do it alone. The project team is keeping track of developments in a very fast-moving field,
gaining vital expertise to help promote European innovation in the future.

The NAoMITEC Project is focusing on SMEs working in micro- and By the end of the project’s 30 month duration, the partners intend
nanotechnologies which exploit the properties of materials on very to have identified 385 candidate SMEs, and to have actively
small scales. The partners are addressing five sectors: aerospace, assisted 95 of these to consider the options for participating in select-
automotive technology, the environment, health, and information ed IPs and NoEs. The final target is to facilitate the entry of 48 SMEs
and communication technologies (ICT). Expertise in micro- and into these two kinds of FP6 projects.
nanotechnologies in these sectors is one of Europe’s key strengths,
and is crucial for European competitiveness. A wealth of experience
The project brings together 16 partners from Austria, Belgium,
The basic objective of the NAoMITEC project is to promote the par- Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Poland, Switzerland,
ticipation of SMEs in the new instruments of the Sixth Framework The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. They comprise a mix-
Programme (FP6). These are primarily the large Integrated Projects ture of research and development agencies, enterprise agencies,
(IP) and Networks of Excellence (NoE). academic research centres and business consultancies. Together,
they have the combination of expertise in business, research and
Five-point plan technology required to help SMEs make the sometimes difficult step
The partners are tackling their work through a five-point plan. The towards participating in large European projects. Three of the
first stage is to review the current situation in the partnership coun- partners are based outside of the EU, adding to the inclusive
tries, as it affects SMEs in the targeted sectors. The partners then transnational character of NAoMITEC.
go on to identify the most active and best qualified SMEs and assess
both their technological needs and their existing development Each partner is undertaking a variety of technology audits of SMEs
plans. in their region. This generates profiles of selected SMEs which are
posted on the NAoMITEC website, alongside a growing list of the
Stage three is a matching-up process identifying existing or planned most relevant IPs and NoEs. This will enable the website to evolve
IPs and NoEs which fit with the needs and plans of the selected SMEs. into a central resource, where SMEs and IPs and NoEs can iden-
Next, the NAoMITEC partners establish the necessary contacts that tify one another and then approach the most appropriate NAoMITEC
allow national and transnational networks to develop in a way that project partners for further assistance.
can help the SMEs to become incorporated into IPs and NoEs.
All members of the proj-
Finally, all the necessary assistance is given to actually allow the ect team have a long
selected SMEs to join IPs and NoEs that have been identified as history in dissemi-
appropriate to their needs. Overall, the small companies gain sig- nating informa-
nificant benefits from becoming part of large-scale transnational tion, contacting
research and development projects, while the larger partners in these research insti-
projects are able to draw on the very specialised expertise found tutions and
in European SMEs. industries,

Micro- and nanotech-


nologies are at the
heart of European innovation.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 21

ETI–1

both large and SMEs, and in assisting them in their quest for innova- “We work as ‘talent scouts’, discovering
tion. Many also have relevant experience and competence acquired the great potential and skills in
through their participation in the earlier Minatech project which was
European SMEs.”
funded by FP5. The primary objective of Minatech was the promotion
of the use of micro- and nanotechnologies among European SMEs.

Looking forward Contact person


The effects of a successful NAoMITEC project should serve to pro- Piero Bufalini
mote European competitiveness by helping to maximise the effec- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca Industriale
tiveness of the new initiatives in FP6. The project will increase the Viale Gorizia 25/C
contribution of SMEs to high-tech research and applications signif- 00198 Rome
icantly, and promote the clustering of enterprises with similar aims Italy
for co-operation both at national and transnational level. These end Tel: +39 0688 48831
results should yield a clear increase in transnational technology trans- Fax: +39 0685 52949
fer and a higher return for the EU funding involved.
Project website
The micro- and nanotechnology sector is characterised by rapid tech- www.airi.it/NAOMITEC
nological innovation and a fast-changing business environment.
Companies come and go and merge very rapidly. NAoMITEC will Participants
help in the difficult task of keeping track of this fast-moving field, 1 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
deepening the knowledge on the state of art. This will generate a 2 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche – Istituto per lo Studio
valuable knowledge base that will also help the partners to look dei Materiali Nanostrutturati – Gruppo Tecnologico (IT)
beyond FP6 and prepare for the fresh challenges of the future. 3 Bureau for International Research and Technology
Cooperation (AUT)
Project title 4 Agence bruxelloise pour l’entreprise (BE)
NAno and MIcro -TEC SMEs in Integrated Projects (IPs) and 5 Eureco Oy (FI)
Networks of Excellence (NoE) (NAoMITEC) 6 Chambre régionale de commerce et d’industrie de
Bourgogne (FR)
Contract number 7 Commissariat à l’énergie atomique (FR)
CT-2004-508505 8 Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (EL)
9 VDI/VDE – Innovation + Technik GmbH (DE)
Duration 10 Iserd – Matimop (IL)
30 months 11.Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish
Academy of Sciences (PL)
Global project cost 12 Euroresearch – Réseau suisse d’innovation (CH)
€1 811 019 13 Swiss Foundation for Research in Microtechnology (CH)
14 SenterNovem/EG-Liaison (NL)
EC contribution 15 Beta Technology Ltd. (UK)
€1 381 654
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 22

Getting off to a good start in biotech


NATIBS

“There are benefits available for SMEs in The NATIBS project is helping newly created
the short, medium and long term.” biotechnology companies to become involved in Sixth
Framework Programme (FP6) research activities. These start-
up companies would find the complexity of the proposal process and
other administrative hurdles very challenging, and thus would be unlikely to
join FP6 research without significant assistance. They are being encouraged to
become involved in order to reap the benefits of access to the resulting innovations, and the
commercial advantages of being introduced to trans-European networks. The project is also identifying
best practices in project development and will disseminate these through a formal report.

The biotechnology industry is one of the fastest growing and most It can be difficult persuading some of these SMEs of the advantages
exciting sectors of 21st century commerce. Biotechnology is a of becoming involved in large collaborative research programmes.
very challenging arena to be starting business in, with many com- An important part of the work of the NATIBS partners is to explain
panies falling by the wayside or being swallowed up in waves of the long-term benefits, in terms of access to the results of research,
consolidation. Young small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) including patents; and the medium- and short-term benefits that
usually have more pressing demands on their attention than the include fast incorporation into trans-European networks. The proj-
opportunities offered by participating in FP6 research, but NATI- ect is encouraging and helping the SMEs to look outwards, to a wider
BS can give a helping hand. Europe, at a time in their commercial lives when there is a danger
they may become too preoccupied with the shorter-term demands
The FP6 instruments being targeted by NATIBS are the Integrated for survival. One factor making it easier to draw in SMEs from the
Projects and Networks of Excellence, although the NATIBS consor- biotechnology sector is that most of these companies already have
tia can also be very useful as regards the traditional instruments. a strong culture of research, although on a smaller scale than the
The partners’ first task is to identify existing and planned projects large IPs and NoEs.
that would welcome and benefit from SME involvement. The part-
ners are achieving this by using their extensive networks of contacts, Audits and assessments
as well as appraising the forthcoming calls for proposals in order The project is analysing 240 biotechnology SMEs across Europe,
to be ready to help suitable SMEs to join in. in the six countries where the partners are based, namely France,
Germany, Spain, Sweden, Estonia and Israel. During their work of
Guiding lights identifying and assessing suitable SMEs, the project partners are
The complementary aspect of the project is to identify good biotech- conducting 170 technology audits for the companies, assessing
nology SMEs that might be willing to become part of a new proj- exactly what they do and what research programmes they might
ect proposal, or to join an existing project. Most of the NATIBS part- be suited to.
ners are organisations which exist to ‘incubate’ innovative companies
by providing guidance and helping in the search for funding. In most The partners are also acquiring useful information about best prac-
cases, the partners are publicly funded bodies, although sometimes tices in project and proposal development.
private finance from venture capitalists and other sources can be This knowledge will be used
involved. The project is being coordinated by the Essonne Chamber to write a best practice
of Commerce and Industry in France, using valuable general expe- report in collabora-
rience of the business environment in Europe. Most of the partners tion with another
have considerable experience in EU Framework Programmes, ETI project
making them ideal for giving guidance to novice companies. (Talentscout)
which is
The expertise held by many of the partners includes substantial knowl-
edge of which new biotechnology companies exist in their region
of operation, what they are doing, and which FP6 projects they might
be suited to. Attention is focused mainly on companies that are less
than three years old, are still reliant on outside sources of funding,
and are very busy with the problems of starting out on commercial
life in a very competitive sector.
Lab bench medical science increasingly involves
biotechnology. © J.Grison/Rapho Photo
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 23

ETI–1

“We hope to integrate 40 SMEs into new


focusing on more mature biotechnology firms. This joint report or existing projects, including 12 into
will review the bigger picture in this area, involving a wider range
Integrated Projects or Networks of
of companies than NATIBS could cover on its own. The lessons
learned will be available to promote good practice across Europe.
Excellence.”
The project website and a series of newsletters are also disseminat-
ing guidance from the NATIBS partners more widely.

The great advantage for Europe as a whole in drawing start-up


biotechnology SMEs into FP6 is that it allows the ideas and expert-
ise within very young companies to feed into wider European
research immediately. This happens long before it might occur if the
SMEs were left to rely on their own initiative. In the large FP6 proj-
ects that result, the SMEs can expect to be working with some long-
established universities, commercial companies and other organisa-
tions, creating a good blend of commercial youth and experience.

Project title Contact person


New approaches and tools for incubated biotechs smes (natibs) to Mr Jérôme Billé
enhanced participation in the 6th FP (NATIBS) Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Essonne
2, cours Monseigneur Roméro
Contract number 91004 Evry
CT-2004-508583 France
Tel: +33 1607 99147
Duration Fax: +33 1607 99071
30 months j.bille@essonne.cci.fr
www.essonne.cci.fr
Global project cost
€ 810 377 Project website
www.natibs.net
EC contribution
€ 607 497 Participants
1 Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Essonne (FR)
2 Inno-TSD (FR)
3 TBS-Technologiestiftung Innovationszentrum Berlin (DE)
4 BBB Management GmbH Campus Berlin-Buch (DE)
5 Parc Cientific de Barcelona (ES)
6 Incubator Novum Research Park (SE)
7 Tallinn Technology Park Development Foundation (EE)
8 Biomedical Incubator Rad Ramot (IL)
9 Genopole Evry-Île de France (FR)

Biomolecules are at the heart


of biotechnology.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 24

Towards the multimedia future


PATENT

“We are gathering the cream of the The PATENT project is a platform of professional
SMEs and feeding them into suitable and high-added-value services for European SMEs in
research projects.” the digital and cross-media sectors, helping them to tap into
new research opportunities. PATENT matches innovative SMEs with
suitable Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) projects. Expert consultants
assist the SMEs in all the phases of developing a research idea, tailoring it to the
Framework Programme’s instruments, finding appropriate partners and helping their
involvement in high-quality proposals. The SMEs gain the technological and commercial opportunities
that come from participating in research programmes with partners they might otherwise never have
teamed up with.

Some of the most influential innovations of recent years have Once suitable SMEs have been identified, the PATENT consultants
involved multimedia and information communication technologies then guide them through the process of refining their ideas, linking
(ICT), greatly affecting everyday life. Many small and medium-sized up with suitable partners and selecting an appropriate FP6 instru-
enterprises (SMEs) in the ‘digital and cross-media’ sector have the ment from which to apply for funding. Project experts provide
potential to develop the innovations that will keep it at the forefront timely information on European programmes and related current
of modern technology. and future calls for projects, while assessing the ‘EU-relevance’ of
ideas and technologies. They also advise on the drafting and con-
The PATENT project is helping small companies with innovative ideas solidation of project proposals.
but limited resources to become partners in FP6 Integrated Projects
(IPs) and Networks of Excellence (NoE). This is drawing suitable Pooling ideas
SMEs into wider networks and providing business opportunities they PATENT is a 30-month project, which began on 1 October 2003.
could not have developed on their own. Several workshops have already taken place in various countries
across Europe, including some of the new Member States. Some
The SME target group for the PATENT project includes content SMEs have already been linked into IP proposals, working towards
owners and aggregators, hardware and software providers, net- a target of 50 SMEs to be introduced into European R&D projects
work operators, broadcasters, telecommunication service providers over the duration of the project.
and multimedia centres.
Without the type of assistance offered by PATENT, it is sometimes
A broad spectrum difficult for SMEs to make contact with and talk to the coordinators
The research needs and opportunities in this field are very varied, of big IPs and NoE, often established in large organisations. The
and comprise new ways to use multimedia technology and ICT to gen- project is acting as an intermediary to help the big players in the
erate innovative processes for industry, the health sector, commerce, sector work with the small ones, to their mutual advantage.
education and individuals. Examples of areas ripe for research
include new approaches to language-recognition technologies, By helping SMEs to realise their strategies and ‘dreams’, through
analysis of semantics in different languages, and logistics systems. appropriate research, PATENT is helping the
exploitation of the pool of
The PATENT partners are specialist European associations and con- research ideas within
sultancy companies with wide experience in the sector. Each part- SMEs to the benefit
ner acts as the local contact in a region, inviting SMEs to participate of Europe as a
in ‘mentoring workshops’ which are conducted in two key phases. whole. Such
invaluable
The first phase outlines the opportunities in FP6 in the context of the SMEs’ assistance is
individual specialities. The second stage consists of one-to-one confiden-
tial meetings between PATENT experts and each SME that might ben-
efit from the project’s services. During these meetings the specialist con-
sultants can review company competences and assess any ideas they
have about research work they might wish to develop. This process of
technological audit and idea review is essentially a selection procedure
that establishes whether or not an SME is well-suited to becoming a part-
ner in an FP6 activity. In this way, the local partners in the project filter Information and
out the best SMEs in their region for further assistance. communication technologies
are everywhere.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 25

ETI–1

“Many SMEs have great ideas, but lack


providing SMEs with the opportunity to develop into much bigger resources. We can help them find the
generators of European wealth, jobs and economic growth in the
partners they need.”
future. PATENT will undoubtedly increase the participation of SMEs
in FP6.

By bringing different SMEs together, the project is also contribut-


ing to a ‘clusterisation’ of SMEs which can allow them to identify
areas in which they might benefit from becoming allies rather than
competitors.

Although the final overall objective is to link the most suitable


SMEs into new or existing IPs or NoE, many more SMEs will gain
other benefits from the advice they receive. In its final phase,
PATENT will deliver concrete suggestions for post-project activities
for the benefit of SMEs, beyond EU funding. These will include con-
solidating and developing further the inter-SME networks that have
developed during the course of the project.

Project title Contact person


Partnership for Telecommunication New Technologies for SMEs Mr Mauro Bianchi
(PATENT) Technical Support for European Organisations Sprl
32/34 Avenue de Tervuren
Contract number 1040 Brussels
CT-2004-508520 Belgium
Tel: +32 2 230 1090
Duration Fax: +32 2 230 1377
30 months www.teseo.be

Global project cost Project website


€ 1 132 061 www.patentproject.org

EC contribution Participants
€ 665 658 1 Technical Support for European Organisations Sprl (BE)
2 INNOVA S.p.A. (IT)
3 The Brussels Enterprise Agency (BE)
4 The Open Group (UK)
5 GAIA-The Basque County Telecommunication Cluster (ES)
6 SwissMedia – Swiss Multimedia Association (CH)
7 Magyar Tartalomipari Szövetség (Hungarian Association of
Content Industry) (HU)
8 MMC KIBLA (Association for Culture and Education) (SI)
9 Dmmv e.V. – Deutscher Multimedia Verband (DE)
10 IKT- Norge – Multimedia Centre (NO)

Multimedia is the preferred


method for many presentations.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 26

Moulding plastics SMEs into European research


PLASTEAM

“The networking opportunities alone can The European plastics industry faces a growing
be of great benefit to the SMEs.” challenge from its American and Asian competitors, and
the gap between Europe and the competition is widening. The
two-year PLASTEAM project is finding SMEs with something to contribute
to addressing this challenge, and much to gain by participating in the task.
Once identified, the SMEs are being helped to participate in suitable Integrated
Projects or Networks of Excellence. Small companies in this field, operating largely in their
own localities, can be unaware of what is going on across Europe as a whole, and of the EU-wide
opportunities that are out there. PLASTEAM is giving SMEs a place in the bigger picture.

Plastics are everywhere in the modern world, in everything from the matched ‘problem holders’ and ‘problem solvers’, allowing them to
simplest domestic appliances to the most sophisticated high-tech work together in appropriate FP6 research projects.
machines and medical implants. It is more difficult to think of tech-
nologies that do not rely on plastics in some way, than it is to list The project is participating in a series of events across Europe to
those that do. A continuous research effort is devoted to finding new make SMEs aware of the opportunities presented by FP6, and also
and improved applications for plastics, and new chemical technolo- to educate them about the challenges which make participation in
gies to make plastics with better and more useful properties. Much large research projects important for them. In some cases the proj-
of this research takes place in large multinational companies and ect simply distributes printed information for SMEs, while at other
in academic research laboratories, but small companies also have events they make formal presentations to meet SMEs and encour-
a lot to contribute. Many small and medium-sized enterprises are age them to become involved.
at the front line of applying plastics technology to a great variety
of new uses, and have many good ideas and much expertise to feed Full assistance
into plastics research. Once identified, suitable SMEs are in some cases being fitted into
FP6 projects that are already up and running, while in others they
There are problems, however, in that the plastic processing supply are becoming part of a project proposal at the formulation stage.
chain in Europe is very fragmented. Many small companies are com- The PLASTEAM project partners can perform technology audits to
peting with each other in restricted local markets, unable to bene- assess an SME’s technological capabilities and needs, and can pro-
fit from or contribute to the wider European arena, and often not vide full assistance in becoming part of the most appropriate FP6
able to appreciate the benefits of working together. The SMEs are project. The SMEs have expertise allowing them to contribute to the
also under pressure to comply with the demands of the larger development of innovative applications for existing plastics, or
companies in the sector. new kinds of plastic materials, in a wide range of fields including
the automotive industry, electronics, medicine and aeronautics.
Fitting together
The PLASTEAM project is working to alleviate these problems by Through involvement in these European Research projects SMEs can
assisting SMEs to use the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) as a access two main things. First, a means to
means of linking up for mutual benefit, and of becoming more fully bring their innovative ideas to
engaged in research on a European scale. As small companies, the attention of a wider
each of the SMEs may specialise in a particular aspect of the plas- European market,
tic processing supply chain, such as plastic part design in a spe- giving them the
cialised area or a very specific manufacturing process. The PLAS- commercial
TEAM project is trying to help these small players fit into a much advantages of
larger frame. increased vis-

The work of the project is focused on three key objectives, charac-


terised as knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing and knowledge
exploitation. The knowledge acquisition phase involves gathering
information on challenges and opportunities relevant to SMEs in the
sector. The knowledge sharing phase is creating a network of SMEs
among whom this knowledge can be shared, for their benefit and
for the benefit of the European plastics industry in general. The knowl-
edge exploitation phase involves establishing the links between
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 27

ETI–1

“Knowledge-engineering can help


ibility and ultimately greater commercial success. Second, the SMEs to access the skills they need to
SMEs can make direct contact with other companies in the sector
solve problems and exploit
that may become potential clients and collaborators, rather than com-
petitors.
opportunities.”

The 12 PLASTEAM partners come from across Europe and as far


afield as Israel, bringing a wide range of expertise in different spe-
cialities and localities. The project also benefits from the fact that
one partner, The European Plastics Converters Federation, has
links with most of the large industrial associations in the European
plastics industry. So the blend of partners gives the project access
to many specialised local SMEs but also to the big players in the
multinational plastics industry.

By the end of the project the PLASTEAM partners expect to have


worked with at least 1 000 SMEs in awareness-raising and infor-
mation events, performed more than 300 technology audits, and
linked up to 100 SMEs into the Integrated Projects or Networks of
Excellence being launched under FP6.

Project title Contact person


Competitive Research and Innovation for the European Plastics Mr Ricard Jimenez
Processing Supply Chain (PLASTEAM) Ascamm Foundation
PTV Av. Universitat Autonoma, 23
Contract number 08290 Cerdanyola del Valles
CT-2004-508566 Spain
Tel: +34 9359 44700
Duration Fax: +34 9358 01102
24 months rjimenez@ascamm.com
www.ascamm.es
Global project cost
€ 1 221 252 Project website
www.plasteam.org
EC contribution
€ 1 099 126 Participants
1 Ascamm Foundation (ES)
2 Fundacion Gaiker (ES)
3 University of Warwick (UK)
4 European Plastics Converters (BE)
5 Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation
(AT)
6 Agencia de Inovacao, s.a. (PT)
7 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
8 Matimop, Israeli Industry Center for R&D (IL)
9 Elkede – Technology & Design Centre sa (GR)
10 RTD Talos (CY)
11 Slovenian Tool and Die Development Centre (Sl)
12 Plastiasite s.a. (ES)

Moulded plastic components


are everywhere.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 28

Wasting away
PRODESTS

“We will provide easier access to EU Too much best practice in sustainable industrial
funding in technology development and processes does not reach the audience it should.
demonstration.” Advances in developing clean technologies tend to remain
confined to the geographical location where they were conceived, when
they could be put to good use across Europe. The Prodests consortium
aims to change this. Creating Europe-wide networks, breaking down barriers that impede
information dissemination, and developing technology and market road maps, the team will
define business areas and research needs that will enable SMEs to broaden their markets, and become
players at the European level. This 27-member project is also going to create a virtual market place for technology
providers and end-users.

Good news: throughout Europe, national governments are support- Bringing it all together
ing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the development The team’s task is complex but can be briefly summarised by look-
and implementation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing ing at its six work packages (WPs): first, increase SME visibility with-
technologies and waste treatment. Bad news: these initiatives are in the sector; second, overcome the barriers to SMEs; third, create
mostly regional and, consequently, expertise tends to lie in a spe- connectivity; fourth, develop a technology-driven road map; fifth,
cific geographical area. Valuable technology spreads slowly – if develop a market-driven road map; and sixth, define integrated
at all – to other Member States. Clearly, there is a case for dissem- projects with SME involvement.
inating this information and a good reason to blend individual coun-
tries’ research efforts into a pan-European whole. The next critical stage is to link all these tasks together. Starting with
WP2, barriers that inhibit SME participation include such factors
What is required is a facilitating vehicle to integrate European know- as language and lack of available staff, but to analyse this thorough-
how and future research efforts, within a framework of the current and ly, the team has developed a questionnaire which will identify the
future legislative requirements. Synergy is essential so that the result is main obstacles. This done, the team will develop strategies to
greater than the sum of its individual components, and valuable overcome them. WP3 concerns networking and, using the results
research results are not simply left to gather dust. This is where Prodests from WP2, will define the individual networks most suited to SMEs.
– an FP6 Economic and Technological Intelligence (ETI) project – WPs 4 and 5 highlight business or research opportunities, based
comes in. It is designed to create the framework that will promote the on both state-of-the-art and future projections. In particular, the
involvement of SMEs throughout Europe in EC integrated RTD projects. technology road map will give insight into emerging problems, cur-
rently being studied at the university and research institute level, which
Different language, same thoughts will become mainstream issues in the years to come. These forecasts
It is common knowledge that managing a small team of creative are for between five to ten years and, when they are compared,
people can be a difficult task. Keeping them all focused on specif- will show areas where there is a technology requirement to solve
ic objectives and working as a unit can be a challenge. So, trying a specific problem.
to coordinate a grouping of 27 research institutes, universities, com-
panies specialising in technology transfer, and trade associations As for WP1 – the WP2-6 results will feed
– all representing separate SME clusters – is no mean feat. Add to into this area which is effec-
that the cultural and language difficulties arising because the par- tively the knowledge
ticipants come from a total of 17 countries and the problem seems management infra-
even greater. Nevertheless, this consortium has focused objec- structure, a data-
tives, knows exactly how it is going to achieve them, and all the base restricted
team members are pulling in the same direction. to members
but with a lim-
A crucial part of this project is the way the partners regard waste man-
agement. Too often, for example, an ‘end-of-pipe’ mentality dominates.
Many production engineers take the view that as long as the waste
generated by an industrial process is treated, everything is fine. But
this is not so. A much better approach is to improve the process so
that it creates much less pollution to start with. As in medicine, preven-
tative is better than curative – better and, in the long term, cheaper.
And it is technology providers and end-users who share this opinion
the consortium is seeking out. We have to stop this...
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 29

ETI–1

“The project will link environmental


ited public interface. As it grows in size, and the number of hits technologies suppliers with new market
increases, the partners predict it will develop into a virtual market
opportunities.”
place for environmental technology suppliers and users. Further, it
should become an ‘organic’ growing source of information on future
trends. It will give a feeling of the kind of problems that both mem-
bers and non-members have in mind, and will help to keep the two Contact person
road maps up to date. Ms Helen De Wever
Vito
Reluctantly, the partners admit that they must limit the scope of the Boeretang 200
project because resources are finite. They have confined themselves 2400 Mol
to the areas of water, air and waste. Regrettably, energy is just too Belgium
big to handle at this stage, so they cannot claim universality. Tel: +32 1433 6932
Nevertheless, the Prodests network has the potential to make a sig- Fax: +32 1432 6586
nificant impact concerning the integration of Europe-wide know-how info@prodests.org
into future EU research efforts. www.vito.be

Project title Project website


Set-up of a Market-Oriented Methodology for joining SMEs with- www.prodests.org
in Integrated EU research Projects on Innovative Clean and
Environmental Technologies (PRODESTS) Participants
1 Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (BE)
Contract number 2 Centre Technique des Industries Mecaniques (FR)
CT-2004-508683 3 Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten
Forschung e.V. (DE)
Duration 4 Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH (AT)
24 months 5 Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford (UK)
6 ELKEDE – Technology and Design Centre SA (EL)
Global project cost 7 Queen’s University Belfast Environmental Science and Technology
€ 1 501 200 Research Centre (UK)
8 Cork Institute of Technology (IE)
EC contribution 9 Centro de Apoio Tecnológico à Indústria Metalomecãnica (PT)
€ 1 125 000 10 Association pour la recherche et le développement des méth-
odes et processus industriels (FR)
11 D’Appolonia S.p.A. (IT)
12 Centre Technique des Industries de la Fonderie (FR)
13 Fundacion Inasmet (ES)
14 INNOTERM Energetikai es Koernyezetvedelmi Fejlesztoe Kft (HU)
15 Ceramics and Refractories Technological Development Company
(EL)
16 BLUEWATERS Project development and environmental egineer-
ing (AT)
17 Findacion Leia C.D.T. (ES)
18 Asociación de Investigación de la Industria Metalmecanica,
Afines y Conexas (ES)
19 TMBK Partners (PL)
20 Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade (PT)
21 Bogazici University (TR)
22 Business Innovation Centre of Latvian Electronic Industry (LV)
23 Institute for Structural Policies (SK)
24 Czech Cleaner Production Centre (CZ)
25 Verein zur Förderung des Technologie Transfers an der
Hochschule Bremerhaven e.V. (DE)
26 Association of Managers for Cleaner Production (CZ)
27 Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
... if we want to see more of this.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 30

Promoting joined-up European research


PRO-KNOWLEDGE

“With the European Federation, Far too few SMEs are taking part in important
the national associations and the RTD work being carried out in the welding and joining
other partners, we have coverage field. So say the consortium members of Pro-Knowledge
from the ground up.”
project who think that more should be done to bring SMEs into the
European research arena. So this seven-member partnership is organising
technology audits, technology brokerage events and workshops to spread the word
about SME participation. For those who take up the offer, the group provides cradle-to-grave
help at the project application stage, ensuring that, whenever possible, funding is made available to
those who qualify. Even those who do not acquire financial aid have found unexpected benefits arising from
their contacts with the consortium.

Welding is one of the oldest engineering technologies. Whether you The overall result will be a gradual build-up of information in those
are driving your car, sailing or flying as a passenger, or simply sit- technology areas where there are needs, and others where there
ting on a metal-framed chair, you are relying on the welder's skill. is relevant expertise. Then, the team will merge the individual part-
An old technology, yes, but it is one that is still evolving rapidly. Plenty ner networks into a single pan-European data source. When this
of research is being carried out in the field and more small and medi- has been done, technology availability and need can be overlaid
um-sized enterprises (SMEs) should be participating in such work. to match users looking for technology with suppliers potentially capa-
ble of developing it.
That is the view of the partners in the Pro-Knowledge ETI project.
In their opinion, there are opportunities for SMEs to become Although this is an excellent starting point, there is a long haul between
involved in EU-funded research which are simply not being taken a bright idea for a project and its acceptance for funding. This is
up. There are a number of reasons for this: lack of access to infor- where the Pro-Knowledge team’s second layer of expertise kicks in.
mation, or knowing where to find it; little communication between Questions will be asked about how to start the application, eligibil-
companies across Europe which – unknowingly – may need a tech- ity, the financial aspects, intellectual property rights issues, how the
nical answer to exactly the same problem; the administrative com- projects are administered, and so on. The members of this team are
plexity of applying for, and being granted, funding. And so on – experts and have the answers to all these questions and more.
the list is long.
The endgame
By pooling their expertise in the fields of joining processes and sur- So what will the end results be? The partners are confident that by
face technologies, the consortium believes it can contribute signif- the end of the project they will have been instrumental in involving
icantly to the level of SME participation in research projects, par- around 100 SMEs in various EC Framework Programme instruments
ticularly under the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6). They want such as IPs, STREPs, CRAFT and Collective Research Projects.
to break down the walls between SMEs and RTD players using
methodologies developed in earlier projects and their individual The team members stress that there is also added value to this proj-
national experience, to assess SME needs and increase their capa- ect which is not measurable. SMEs with similar profiles across Europe
bilities to adopt new technologies, by participating in EU initiatives. have started talking to each other as a
result of the Pro-Knowledge
Who and how? network. Even if an EU-
The seven members of this five-country team are different in char- funded project is not
acter: a European federation representing the welding communi- an option, they
ty, five companies and a non-profit organisation specialising in tech- are still in con-
nology transfer, and a research centre. Quite a mix although they tact and able
do have two things in common: they all have an intimate knowl- to exchange
edge of their local markets, and they all either possess, or have
access to, technology sources.

The first stage of the plan is to continue the current schedule of com-
pany visits and technology audits. This will then be complemented
by a series of Pro-Knowledge brokerage events that include brain-
storming sessions involving researchers and SME representatives.
Workshops and personal contacts will also play an important part. Not quite seamless, but
getting there.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:25 Page 31

ETI–1

“Our networks will significantly increase


information. This has led to discussions on the various industrial SME awareness of the opportunities
processes in use in different countries and how and why they dif-
offered in FP6.”
fer. The advantages and disadvantages of doing something a cer-
tain way are being informally analysed as never before. People are
seeing how their techniques could be improved by incorporating
elements of someone else's expertise in their own, and vice versa.
This is leading, it seems, to a small but perceptible trend towards
a degree of pan-European harmonisation.

Given that there is a growing number of large European initiatives


– the Airbus A380 and the Eurofighter Typhoon, to name just two
– which rely on components from different countries all made to uni-
form specifications, this can be no bad thing. It could be the only
way that SMEs can get a slice, albeit a small one, of these huge
business opportunities.

Project title Contact person


Promoting SME participation in the ‘Knowledge-based Multifunctional Prof. Susana Escala
Materials’ activity area of FP6 (PRO-KNOWLEDGE) European Federation for Welding, Joining and Cutting
Av. Prof. Covaco Silva, 33 – Taguspark
Contract number 2780-994 Porto Salvo – Oeiras
CT-2004-508513 Portugal
Tel: +351 2142 11351
Duration Fax: +351 2142 28122
24 months siescala@isq.pt
www.ewf.be
Global project cost
€ 548 456 Participants
1 European Federation for Welding, Joining and Cutting (PT)
EC contribution 2 Steinbeis Europa Zentrum (DE)
€ 471 787 3 INNOVA S.p.A. (IT)
4 Fundacion Inasmet (ES)
5 Inovamais S.A. (PT)
6 BIC Bratislava, spol. s.r.o. (SK)
7 ESACT, consultoría S.L. (ES)

No more 'Friday afternoon' cars.


REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 32

Widening the horizons of rural SMEs


RURAL-ETINET

“RURAL-ETINET is an outstanding Economic and Technological Intelligence (ETI)


opportunity to put rural areas back on projects have a general remit to support SMEs in their
the industrial map.” efforts to become involved in EU-supported research. Many
of these firms are based in urban areas, technology parks, or industrial
areas, although there is also a large community of them located in rural areas.
They play a large part in lessening the effects of downturns in agriculture, and are equally
deserving of EU support. The RURAL-ETINET project aims to see that they get it. The 12-member
consortium is developing a rural SME expertise database, and holding promotional, workshop and
network events to encourage small rural firms to get on board.

Ever since human society changed from being based on hunting Opening up
and gathering to one relying on agriculture, there have been rural The open database is an especially useful tool, allowing researchers
SMEs – the blacksmith, the butcher, the woodman. Then came the and project managers requiring rural SME expertise to find poten-
Industrial Revolution which saw the majority of industry being con- tial partners. They can either consult it directly on the website, or con-
centrated in and around cities. However, there is still a significant tact their nearest RURAL-ETINET partner for help and advice. A part-
number of rural small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – nership search form, which is currently under development, will save
changed in nature, of course, as technology has developed – and time wasted trawling the database. When submitted, it will allow
they qualify for membership of EU-supported research projects the Europe-wide network created by RURAL-ETINET to find appro-
just as much as their urban counterparts. Historically, however, their priate potential SME partners quickly and effectively. Conversely, SMEs
uptake of these opportunities has been very low. contacted as a result can call upon the project team for free advice
on complex issues such as intellectual property rights and the finan-
The RURAL-ETINET project members want to change all this. Broadly, cial implications of joining an ongoing or proposed consortium –
the initiative aims to involve SMEs in European research within the areas where SMEs lack knowledge and experience.
Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) by helping them along the
sometimes tortuous route that leads to approval for funding. It is doing The consortium is focusing on three of the FP6 Thematic Priorities,
this by using the technical expertise and local knowledge of SME namely TP5 (food quality and safety), TP6 (sustainable development,
capabilities of 12 organisations in 11 European countries. The part- global change and ecosystems), and TP8 (research for policy sup-
ners are organisations or private companies that consult in-depth port), all of which are of particular relevance to rural regions. As
on EU R&D and technology co-operation activities. They have a such, RURAL-ETINET differs slightly from other ETI efforts in that it
wealth of experience in identifying and contacting individuals and covers a wide area of technical fields, rather than taking the nor-
organisations which could be interested in participating. Once this mal ‘single-issue’ approach. But resources are finite, and the part-
has been achieved, they offer their expertise on issues of eligibil- ners know they cannot be active in every technical field, so they
ity, evaluation, and administrative and legal aspects. have adopted a thematic approach, developing five sub-networks
they believe will cover the majority of their requirements. These
Keeping a high profile address the areas of novel crops, on-farm
They are getting the message across in a number of ways includ- food processing, forestry and
ing events such as conferences, seminars and workshops. To com- the wood chain, waste
plement these services, they are contacting people active in RTD management, and
across a wide range of subjects, within their individual geograph- ecosystems.
ic areas.

The project deliverables comprise the creation of a huge ‘European


rural SME expertise directory’ database (recently made open-
access), and the development of a number of case studies which
demonstrate exactly how SMEs can successfully become involved
in FP6 activities, despite the complexities. These will form the basis
of a number of promotional, workshop and networking events. Far
too often, it seems, perfectly good SME candidates are frightened
off by what they perceive as a prohibitive amount of bureaucratic
requirements that they simply do not know how to handle. Part of
Combining expertise, the
the project team’s job is to allay these fears. way forward for rural SMEs.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 33

ETI–1

The overall success of the RURAL-ETINET partnership will be meas- “Some of these areas have been
ured in terms of the number of consortia it manages to help con- neglected for too long. We have a
struct which include high levels of SME involvement. This is a
chance to put this right.”
tough ask, particularly against a background of rural industries hav-
ing the lowest membership rate in Framework Programmes of any
sector. When the first year of this three-year initiative drew to a close
last December, the signs were good – it is on track. There are def-
inite signs that the initiative can raise, and continue to raise, the
level of rural SME participation in EU-supported research
programmes.

Project title Project website


Economic and Technological Intelligence Project to Facilitate SMEs www.rural-sme.net
in Rural Areas to Participate in the Sixth Framework Programme
(RURAL-ETINET) Participants
1 Beta Technology Ltd (UK)
Contract number 2 Bureau for International Research and Technology
CT-2004-508500 Co-operation (AT)
3 Agenzia Per La Promozione Della Ricerca Europea (IT)
Duration 4 The Swedish EU-R&D Council (SE)
36 months 5 Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TR)
6 University of National and World Economy (BG)
Global project cost 7 RTD Talos Ltd (CY)
€ 1 247 317 8 Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (EL)
9 Food Industrial Research and Technological Development
EC contribution Company S.A. (EL)
€ 979 453 10 Rannsoknamidstod Islands (IS)
11 S.C. Temagon Romania S.R.L. (RO)
Contact person 12 Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of
Mr Roberts Roze Sciences (SK)
Beta Technology Ltd
Barclay Court, Doncaster Carr
DN4 5HZ Doncaster
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 130 232 2633
Fax: +44 130 238 8800
rroze@betatechnology.co.uk
www.betatechnology.co.uk

Many industrial SMEs are ‘hidden’


in the countryside.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 34

Finding a better fit for EU footwear


SHOES5000

”The industry can only move forward by Europe’s shoe and shoe component
pooling individual SME expertise.” manufacturing industries are facing severe threats
from international competitors. The pressure is on to develop
products which will meet current and future requirements. A concerted
approach is required but the industry is dominated by thousands of SMEs which
are spread across the continent and have no history of working together. The
SHOES5000 project is adapting the tools required, such as Integrated Projects and Networks
of Excellent. SMEs are being encouraged to join European initiatives and, by 2007, 5 000 of them
will be involved in producing new products that will safeguard the industries’ future.

The European shoe and shoe component industries are highly gathering, analysis and dissemination of information on science and
regarded throughout the world, particularly in terms of setting technology developments, applications and markets”. Secondly, it
fashion trends. They are, however, suffering ever-stiffer internation- aims to “promote the participation of SMEs and SME groupings in
al competition, and are losing ground both in European and glob- FP6, particularly in Integrated Projects (IPs) and Networks of
al markets. One reason for this is that the industries are dominat- Excellence (NoE) of potential interest to the shoe and auxiliary
ed by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – many thousands industries”.
of them – scattered throughout Europe, resulting in fragmented
responses to this competition and to the need to develop new Planning the route
products for the future. One of the core elements in the partners’ ambitions is to develop
a ‘technology road map’, setting out future technical requirements
But if the industries are to prosper in the future, they must respond and how development projects, or clusters of projects, could
in a concerted and integrated manner. What is needed is an effi- achieve them. This is, in fact, quite a radical change in the way things
cient, networked approach that enables manufacturers of similar are done at the moment. In essence, it involves moving away from
products, wherever they may be, to form strategic alliances, share the current philosophy of providing solutions then looking for a prod-
information, work together on product improvements, and place them- uct to apply them to, towards a culture of identifying current and
selves in a much stronger market position. Enter the SHOES5000 future problems and reacting accordingly. Responding to the real-
ETI initiative which is developing the methodology to identify, sys- ity rather than to the imagined will make technical developments
tematise and formalise development initiatives and ideas within the much more marketable.
shoe industry.
To achieve this, the individual partners will work closely with SMEs
Take your partners in their respective countries, and combine their knowledge and
To achieve this, SHOES5000 has built a consortium of internation- experience with their fellow project members, allowing the results to
ally recognised organisations. It is a five-country, nine-member be disseminated throughout Europe. The requirements of different sec-
alliance made up of centres with a wealth of industry experience tors of the footwear and footwear supply industries will, by definition,
and expertise. Led by Spain’s Insituto Tecnologico del Cazado y vary, but the team believes that it has the
Conexas (Institute for Footwear and Related Industries), the partners expertise needed to cover the
from France, Italy, Portugal and Spain all offer sophisticated majority of urgent require-
research and marketing services dedicated to the future of the ments.
European footwear industry. Between them they have vast knowl-
edge of both components and final shoe manufacturing process-
es, and the companies involved.

The Slovenian participant does not share this profile, but still qual-
ifies as a team member – it is deeply involved in business incuba-
tion programmes for transition countries. This initiative comprises
a number of schemes supporting SMEs, including those firms in the
footwear sector, plus the company has intimate knowledge of the
industry and its individual players.

The two formal objectives of the project are, first, “to stimulate Footwear can be
technological innovation by supporting activities concerning the a fashion statement...
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 35

ETI–1

“SHOES5000 is developing a
The partners are developing methodologies to enable this approach methodology for the systematic
to work at the European level. Their tools include technology
development of initiatives new
audits, and encouraging SMEs to join Sixth Framework Programme
instruments such as IPs and NoE. One – known as the C212
initiatives and ideas.”
Economic Interest Grouping – is already under construction, and
links are being developed with the Fashion-net ETI. To put some fig-
ures on their targets, before the project ends in February 2003 the
partners plan to carry out 200 technology audits, and to encour-
age 150 SMEs to join NoE or IPs. In addition, they plan to have
submitted ten proposals for Co operative Research and Collective
Research projects, and five for STREPs. And that is just the tip of
the iceberg – the team’s overall target calls for the involvement of
5 000 SMEs in various actions, hence the project name. It should
all be a major boost to the European footwear industry creating both
jobs and wealth for the EU economy.

Project title Contact person


Promotion of Footwear and Components Industry Participation in Prof. Enrique Montiel
the Sixth Framework Programme (SHOES5000) Instituto Tecnologico del Calzado y Conexas
Pica
Contract number 03600 Elda
CT-2004-508562 Spain
Tel: +34 96 539 5213
Duration Fax: +34 96 538 1045
30 months emontiel@inescop.es
www.inescop.es
Global project cost
€ 1 842 046 Participants
1 Instituto Tecnologico del Calzado y Conexas (ES)
EC contribution 2 Asociación Española de Empresas de Componentes oara el
€ 1 382 295 Calzado (ES)
3 Innovages Fomento de la Innovacion S.L. (ES)
4 Render Multimedia S.L. (ES)
5 Centre Technique du Cuir, Chaussure et Marroquinerie (FR)
6 C.G.S. di Coluccia Michele & C. S.A.S. (IT)
7 BIC Toscana SCpA (IT)
8 Business Support Centre KRANJ. LTD. (SI)
9 Centro Tecnologico do Calcado (PT)

... or purely functional.


REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 36

A feast of innovation
SMESforFOOD

The importance given to food quality and


safety under FP6 makes this a natural area for
Economic and Technological Intelligence (ETI) projects.
SMEsforFOOD involves a large consortium that aims to help at least
150 SMEs find places in collaborative research projects. Much of the demand
identified from project leaders is for SMEs in the biotech sector, but sensors and
diagnostic techniques are also needed. The SMEsforFOOD database contains many SMEs with
other competences, ranging from agriculture to information technology, that are relevant to modern
food production. SMEsforFOOD has held a large and successful brokerage event, and has already helped several
companies to find projects to join.

With a total EU budget of nearly €700 million, the Sixth Framework The project’s database now contains details of around 200 SMEs
Programme’s Thematic Priority 5 – Food Quality and Safety – has that are actively interested in joining FP6 projects. The spread of
great potential for innovation. While much of the food industry is activities is wide with more than a third of the companies in food
traditionally somewhat conservative in its outlook, recent scientif- processing, food technology and equipment, while a further 20%
ic progress has created many opportunities for new technology, specialise in analysis and detection, and 10% in biotech. The
explains Michel Ganoote of Agence Nationale de Valorisation de remaining third of the companies include agriculture and aquacul-
la Recherche (ANVAR), a French government agency that pro- ture, nutrition, traceability, and services including software.
motes and supports research and innovation within small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and acts as the National Contact High on the menu
Point (NCP) for French SMEs. SMEsforFOOD was launched with a bang at the second Food Safety
and Quality trade fair in Toulouse. One SME that the organisers met
To increase SME participation in FP6 Integrated projects (IPs) and at the launch, a sensor company researching into electronic noses,
Networks of excellence (NoE), ANVAR coordinated the creation of is currently negotiating to join an FP6 collaborative research project.
an ETI project known as SMEsforFOOD. Launched in December
2003, SMEsforFOOD will run for three years. As befits a project Since this excellent start, SMEsforFOOD has maintained a high pub-
with such wide coverage, SMEsforFOOD has a large budget lic profile. October 2004 saw a brokerage event in Lille, which
(€1.7 million) and a consortium to match: 19 partners from 16 coun- SMEsforFOOD organised alongside an important European confer-
tries, including four new Member States, one candidate country and ence on food safety and nutrition. The two-day brokerage event
two Associated Countries. The partners include ten SME national attracted around 110 participants from 20 countries. Presentations cov-
contact points (NCPs), four food NCPs and several technical ered 19 FP6 projects, ranging from those in progress to those under
centres specialising in the agri-food sector. preparation for the third and fourth calls for proposals, and more than
120 meetings were organised between SME representatives and
The six work packages of SMEsforFOOD cover three main actions. current or future FP6 projects.
First, the consortium members act as a general source of SME-relat-
ed information about food matters under FP6. Secondly, the proj- An example of a cur-
ect will identify and audit both potential SMEs and coordinators of rent IP that was
IPs and NoEs who are looking for SME partners. Thirdly, it will give able to locate
practical assistance to both SMEs and IP/NoE coordinators to three SME
help turn opportunities into real Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) partners
projects. The aim is for at least 150 SMEs to join IPs or NoEs through
SMEsforFOOD.

Wide range of opportunities


The first call for proposals under the Food Quality and Safety pro-
gramme yielded a budget allocation of less than 8% for SMEs, com-
pared to the Commission’s target of 15%. Yet many of the pro-
gramme’s themes, especially methods of analysis, detection and
control, are very suitable for high-tech SMEs. For instance a great
deal of the demand from project leaders is for biotechnology,
which is an ideal area for SMEs. Analysis and detection is anoth-
Ciabata production line
er important area where SMEs can make a significant contribution. © Oséo-Anvar/Studio Pons
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 37

ETI–1

through SMEsforFOOD is QualityLowInputFood (QLIF). This project aims


to improve food quality and safety, while simultaneously reducing cost,
in the European organic and ‘low-input’ food chains. A Greek SME
which has developed a pheromone-based crop protection system is
working with QLIF partners to create a nationally funded project. A
French SME producing herbal supplements for animal feed may be
included in a QLIF work package, and another feed supplement
manufacturer – this time an Austrian SME which makes probiotics –
is preparing a CRAFT proposal with QLIF partners.

Another current IP working closely with SMEsforFOOD is


SEAFOODplus, a 70-partner project to create safe and healthy
farmed seafood that is also of high eating quality. And for the future,
SMEsforFOOD is building links between SMEs and projects being Contact person
prepared for the third and fourth calls. One example of such is a Mr Michel Ganoote
Turkish SME in vegetable oils production, which SMEsforFOOD is ANVAR – Agence Française de l’Innovation
helping to join an IP concerned with detection methods. 43, rue de Caumartin
75436 Paris
Project title France
Specific Support action to improve the participation of SMEs in Tel: +33 1401 78538
Integrated projects and Networks of Excellence in the Food Quality Fax: +33 1492 49621
and Safety sector (SMESforFOOD) smesforfood@anvar.fr
www.anvar.fr
Contract number
CT-2004-508589 Project website
www.smesforfood.org
Duration
36 months Participants
1 ANVAR – Agence Française de l’Innovation (FR)
Global project cost 2 HLP Developpement (FR)
€ 1 674 620 3 Association de Coordination Technique pour l’Industrie Agro-
alimentaire (FR)
EC contribution 4 Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation
€ 1 227 150 (AT)
5 Euresearch/Schweizer Netzwerk für Innovation – Réseau Suisse
d’Innovation SNI-RSI (CH)
6 Gabinete de Relações Internacionais da Ciência e do Ensino
Superior (PT)
7 SENTER (NL)
8 Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TR)
9 Fundación AZTI – AZTI Fundazioa (ES)
10 ISERD – MATIMOP (IL)
11 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
12 The Brussels Enterprise Agency (BE)
13 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
14 RTD TALOS LTD (CY)
15 Food Industrial Research and Technological Development
Company S.A. (EL)
16 Danish Agricultural Council (DK)
17 Hungarian Science and Technology Foundation (HU)
18 Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy
of Sciences (PL)
19 Technology Centre of the Academy of Sciences CR (CZ)

In vitro multiplication for the production of a


new onion variety © Oséo-Anvar/Coop D’or
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 38

Matchmaker, matchmaker, make me a match


SMEs go
LifeSciences
“This project represents a golden Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are
opportunity for SMEs to influence the under-represented in the field of life sciences in the EU’s
future of Life Sciences.” Sixth Framework Programme. The 28 members of the SMEs
go LifeSciences ETI consortium are doing something about this. They
have initiated training services for SMEs wanting to get involved in this
European research sector and are helping with proposal documents for research funding.
This, combined with a ‘matchmaking’ service, provides an integrated strategy. The group aims
to contact 2 500 SMEs during project and to encourage as many as possible to benefit from the support.
They will also expand their networks to interact with other European organisations concerned with international
co-operation and technology transfer.

Research into life sciences, broadly defined as those areas, such of being found and identified as potential research partners for EU-
as biomedicine, genomics, biochemistry, biotechnology, botany and funded projects. Numerous SMEs have already registered to take
genetics, covering living organisms has, for too long, been predom- advantage of this service. Secondly, research consortia that are
inantly in the domain of large organisations. That is the opinion of preparing FP6 project proposals and are looking for SME partners
the 28 partners in the SMEs go LifeSciences initiative. Their belief can register and enter their project idea into the database. Forty-
is that SMEs can make a significant contribution in these fields, and two project ideas were prepared for the third call in the FP6 Life
that the goal of 15% SME participation in this thematic priority of Sciences Programme (Thematic Priority 1), and requests for SME
the Sixth Framework Programme can be achieved. partners were available in the database. Thirdly, through the
proactive matchmaking activities of the consortium, researchers have
How? Well, the overall objectives of this Economic and Technological been, and will continue to be, introduced to suitable SMEs. Finally,
Intelligence (ETI) partnership are to promote two major lines of activ- interested SMEs and research consortia can actively search the pub-
ity: first, training and capacity-building for SMEs, SME groupings, lic database independently.
and researchers, on how to involve small and medium-sized firms
in this kind of research; secondly, to provide a consortium-building The Baltic connection
and ‘matchmaking’ service for SMEs preparing proposal documents The project also acts as a helpdesk that is highly focused on
for research project funding. Throughout the course of this three-year informing and training SMEs and researchers on FP6 issues. The
project, the partners plan to contact no fewer than 2 500 European focus lies mainly on the legal and financial aspects, but issues such
life science-related companies. They will place particular empha- as proposal writing and the importance of SME involvement are also
sis on enabling SMEs and SME groupings to join highly Integrated dealt with. During the first six months, the joint efforts of the proj-
Projects (IPs) and Networks of Excellence (NoE). ect partners resulted in the organisation of 39 national and sever-
al transnational training sessions. The highlight of these activities
Weaving the web was a transnational training session, organised for the Baltic
Naturally, a partnership setting itself these goals must comprise Dynamics Conference in Riga, Latvia, on 10 September 2004. After
experts in the scientific field who also have strong links with rele- three presentations focusing on information about currently open
vant SMEs in their own geographic area, involvement in interna- calls in FP6, tips for preparing a good
tional networks, and a thorough knowledge of the structure and mech- project proposal were given
anisms involved in EU-supported research, including issues such as and the financial aspects
intellectual property rights, financial implications, and EU manage- of FP6 were dis-
ment structures. The SMEs go LifeSciences consortium has those qual- cussed. The event
ities. The members – coming from 20 Member States, three candi-
date countries, and three Associated States – are spreading the
networking web across Europe.

The initiative’s deadlines called for a rapid set-up of the network,


in particular, to cover the third major call for proposals for life sci-
ences within FP6 in November 2004. At the same time, the con-
sortium has created a website, and established a comprehensive
database which provides several services to its SME clients. First,
it gives SMEs the opportunity to display their companies’ expert-
ise and know-how. This increases their visibility among Europe’s
DNA is the starting point
research community in life sciences and maximises their chances for life sciences...
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 39

ETI–1

“We have set demanding goals but we


served as a forum for SMEs interested in international RTD co-oper- have the team to achieve them.”
ation in Framework Programmes and research consortia looking for
SME partners. The feedback from participants demonstrates that this
kind of event is considered extremely valuable.

Further such events are planned – a total of 160 national and six
transnational – but the consortium is not stopping there. The mem-
bers plan to continue collaboration with the European Commission
and related entrepreneurial networks such as Europabio (the
European Association for Bioindustries) and the Innovation Relay
Centres to ensure their ongoing success.

Project title Project website


Activities supporting SME participation in the instruments – partic- www.smesgolifesciences.org
ularly Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence – in the
areas of Life Sciences in the 6th Framework Programme (SMEs go Participants
LifeSciences) 1 FFG-Austrian Research Promotion Agency (AT)
2 Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy
Contract number of Sciences (PL)
CT-2004-508527 3 The Swedish EU-R&D Council (SE)
4 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
Duration 5 Euro Top Cooperation Partners (BE)
36 months 6 Israel-Europe R&D Directorate for FP6 (IL)
7 Hungarian Science and Technology Foundation (HU)
Global project cost 8 The Brussels Enterprise Agency (BE)
€ 2 557 855 9 Emerging Technologies Network Agency Ltd (UK)
10 Latvian Technological Centre (LV)
EC contribution 11 EuroCenter – Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation
€ 1 734 025 (DK)
12 Malta Council for Science and Technology (MT)
Contact person 13 Small Business Development Centre Ljubljana (SI)
Ms Birgit Steininger 14 Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TR)
FFG-Austrian Research Promotion Agency 15 Research Promotion Foundation (CY)
Donau-City-Straße 1 16 National Documentation Centre (EL)
1220 Vienna 17 German Aerospace Centre, Project management organisation
Austria on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (DE)
Tel: +435 7755 4101 18 Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (BG)
Fax: +435 7755 94011 19 Agency for International Science and Technology Development
birgit.steininger@ffg.at Programmes (LT)
www.bit.ac.at 20 SenterNovem (NL)
21 SNI-RSI Verein Euresearch (CH)
22 Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (FR)
23 SC Temagon Romania SRL (RO)
24 Centre for Advancement, Science and Technology (SK)
25 Gabinete de Relações Internacionais da Ciência e do Ensino
Superior (PT)
26 University-Enterprise Foundations Network (ES)
27 The Research Council of Norway (NO)
28 Beta Technology Ltd (UK)

... and should not just be the domain of the ‘big boys’.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 40

Harnessing the power of trade associations


STIMULATE

“SMEs want to exploit results outside Groups of SMEs operating as single partners
the project’s core area. Large in FP6 collaborative research projects can achieve
companies don’t.” things that are too difficult for SMEs acting individually. A
mechanism for this existed in principle, but had never been properly
defined. StiMulatE is a cross-sectoral project that set out to create a legal
framework, known as an Enterprise Grouping (EG), allowing SMEs to work together
in this way. Using national trade associations as starting points, the project partners are now
in the process of setting up EGs and getting them into real projects in the NMP and IST thematic areas.
Dissemination of research results is one area where EGs are expected to do well.

Getting more small and medium-sized (SMEs) into transnational col- National associations are generally the most suitable vehicles for
laborative research projects is an admirable goal, but not one that EGs because pan-European organisations often see their main job
individual SMEs always find easy to achieve. Mark Wells, Secretary- as lobbying at European level, and are less interested in individ-
General of the Brussels-based European Association of Innovating ual research projects. Five of the consortium partners are based in
SMEs (EurExcel), explains that when an SME is trying to work along- the new Member States, and Mr Wells is particularly impressed with
side a giant corporation, both parties can sometimes become frus- their enthusiasm. EGs can also be formed from groups of small
trated by differences in culture and expectations. research performers.

Another option could be to allow a group of SMEs to act as a sin- The next step, which is the current work of the consortium, is to build
gle partner in the project. With more resources at their disposal, EGs across Europe and incorporate them into existing and new
members of such a group would stand a better chance of holding Integrated Projects (IPs) and Specific Targeted Research Projects
their own against the big names. They would also be well placed (STREPs) under FP6. A key role for EGs is spreading the knowledge
to take on a part of the project that many large companies try hard developed by a project beyond the boundaries of the original core
to avoid: disseminating the research results and applying the new industry.
knowledge in areas beyond the scope of the original project.
Large companies in, for example, the aerospace sector do not take
EurExcel realised that back in 2002 the Commission had pro- well to applying their research results elsewhere, even though they
posed a mechanism that would allow groups of SMEs to operate may technically be obliged to do so. An EG that helps the existing
in this way. The problem was that the arrangement, known as an project dissemination and exploitation manager, or takes over this
Enterprise Grouping (EG), had never been properly specified. So, role completely, can often do the job with much more enthusiasm.
EurExcel set up a project, known as StiMulatE, with the aim of cre- This will benefit the owners of the project’s intellectual property, who
ating a legal framework for EGs, setting them up and getting them will gain licensing revenue, and the SMEs themselves who will
on board existing and new Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) col- profit from new products and customers.
laborative research projects. StiMulatE started in January 2004 and
will finish in April 2006. Real projects emerge
So far, around 15 EGs formed as a
Frameworks and opportunities result of StiMulatE have put
An obvious place to find ready-made groups of SMEs, explains Mr forward project propos-
Wells, is in trade bodies. Accordingly, the StiMulatE consortium is als, and Mr Wells
made up of 12 industry associations, two of which operate at expects one or two
European level and ten at national level. The focus is on the NMP of these to evolve
(Nanotechnologies, Multifunctional Materials, New Processes) and
IST (Information Society Technologies) thematic areas of FP6, with
the electronics and automotive industries strongly represented.

SAFEHOSE, an
The consortium’s first task was to set up a legal framework for EGs. Integrated Project
It turns out that most industry associations have constitutions that are that includes an
Enterprise Grouping
surprisingly flexible, allowing new member companies – even of SMEs formed
from other industries – to join the association if the board agrees. under the StiMulatE
project, aims to improve
StiMulatE has now created the necessary legal framework and know-
automotive hydraulic
how to allow EGs to be set up as required. hoses and fittings.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 41

ETI–1

“The enthusiasm of trade


into real projects. Another project, an IP named SAFEHOSE, is associations from the new Member
already off the ground with EG participation. This €5 million proj-
States is a real pleasure.”
ect aims to develop new technologies for automotive hydraulics, and
is a classic example of R&D with tremendous potential outside its
core area. Without the EG to take the results into other areas, this
work might end up confined to the automotive industry, although
hydraulic systems are used in almost every area of engineering.

The third and final task of StiMulatE is to create financial and other
strategies that will allow the EGs and their SME members to turn
good ideas into new businesses. The problem here is that by the
time the current projects start to yield results, around 2007,
StiMulatE will no longer exist. The coordinator hopes to find more
funding so that he can set up a successor project that can help to
finish the job begun by StiMulatE.

Project title Contact person


An SME Technology & Innovation Multiplier Using Leveraged Mr Mark Wells
Associations, Trade Bodies & Enterprise Groupings (STIMULATE) The European Association of Innovating SMEs
Rue Breydel 40
Contract number B-1040 Brussels
CT-2004-508721 Belgium
Tel: +32 2 235 8622
Duration Fax: +32 2 235 8686
27 months mark.wells@eurexcel.org
www.eurexcel.org
Global project cost
€ 1 693 256 Project website
www.stimulate.org
EC contribution
€ 1 219 837 Participants
1 The European Association for Innovating SMEs (BE)
2 Nederland~ICT (NL)
3 Hungarian Federation for Electronics and Infocommunication
(HU)
4 Fachverband Elektronik-Design e.V. (DE)
5 Latvian Electrical Engineering and Electronics Industry Association
(LV)
6 National Metals Technology Centre Ltd (UK)
7 Polska Izba Konstrukcji Stalowych (PL)
8 The Danish Plastics Federation (DK)
9 Magyar Vegyipari Szövetség (HU)
10 Spanish Association of Equipments and Components
Manufacturers for the Automotive Industry (ES)
11 Automotive Industry Association of the Slovak Republic (SK)
12 European Association of Research and Technology Organisation
(BE)
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 42

The power of SYNERGY


SYNERGY

“Distributed energy offers a superb Although the traditional electricity-generating


opportunity for technology-based SMEs.” market is dominated by a few large companies, recent
deregulation offers excellent opportunities for SMEs. This is
particularly true in ‘distributed energy’ – small-scale, local, generating
and CHP systems often based on renewable energy, where technology is evolving
rapidly. Yet many SMEs in this sector are reluctant to make the leap into transnational
research, so this is an ideal target for an ETI project. The SYNERGY project aims to create practical
mechanisms that will get more SMEs into FP6 research proposals and projects, to create networks of
small energy firms, and to disseminate best practice in both technology and management.

The liberalisation of the energy market has brought great oppor- and most of the other partners have specific experience in the ener-
tunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The open- gy sector. The project has seven partners, in Spain, France, Germany,
ing up of areas formerly reserved for state-run electricity companies Austria and Finland, and will run for 18 months from May 2004.
has created new markets for equipment and services, and nowhere
has this been more apparent than in the distributed energy resource The SYNERGY partners offer SMEs in the distributed energy sec-
(DER) sector. tor face-to-face technical and management audits with experi-
enced consultants. Also available are networking opportunities –
‘Distributed energy’ simply means producing or storing energy, espe- with large energy companies and independent energy experts, and
cially electricity, at or near its point of consumption. Electricity is tra- between SMEs themselves. The partners will aim to use this network-
ditionally produced in a relatively small number of large power sta- ing to produce easily assimilated chunks of information, or “knowl-
tions, each rated at hundreds or thousands of megawatts. This power edge pills”, on best practices to support SMEs in their strategic plan-
travels over long distances, first via major transmission systems and ning, explains Mr Peña. In this politically sensitive area, these
then through local distribution networks serving customers. firms need the best available information on economic, legal,
social and political as well as technical issues.
Most renewable energy plants – including wind, solar and biomass
– are smaller than their fossil-fuel counterparts, so the trend towards Finally, the partners will help SMEs prepare proposals for new FP6
renewables implies distributed energy. So too does combined heat projects: Integrated Projects (IPs), Networks of Excellence (NoE),
and power (CHP) in which waste heat from a small thermal gen- Specific Targeted Research Projects (STREPs) and CRAFT projects.
erating plant is used directly for space heating, hot water or They will also match likely SMEs to other project proposals, follow-
process steam. And fuel cells, the next big thing in power genera- ing requests from existing consortia.
tion, are ideal for distributed energy systems.
Learning and growing
Neglected opportunities The SYNERGY database lists
DERs thus bring SMEs a whole range of opportunities to develop companies with
technologies for power generation and management of distribution expertise in
grids. Unfortunately, according to Carlos Peña, many small com- many differ-
panies in the energy sector are not making the most of the oppor- ent fields
tunities open to them. Experience from the Fifth Framework
Programme (FP5) shows that many SMEs in the energy sector do
not see the need for collaboration at European level, he says, pre-
ferring to work with local partners – often because they are wary
of giving away information to their competitors.

Mr Peña is the coordinator of an ETI project called SYNERGY


which aims to increase the participation of distributed energy SMEs
in FP6 projects. SYNERGY is led by Fundación Labein, a technolo-
gy research centre near Bilbao, in the Basque region of Spain. Labein
has strong links with Iberdrola, Spain’s largest electricity supplier,

Solar thermal energy. The SYNERGY project is promoting innovation among


SMEs, which have enormous potential in the distributed energy field.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 43

ETI–1

of distributed energy, including fuel cells; hydrogen production, stor- “We will information on economic, legal,
age and distribution; CHP (cogeneration); wind power; solar social and political issues, as well as
power; geothermal energy; biomass and waste as fuels for power
technical ones.”
generation; and integration and grid issues surrounding the effec-
tive use of distributed energy resources.

So far, the SYNERGY partners have identified and gathered details


from more than 100 SMEs, some of which are now involved in EU-
supported research projects as a direct result of their links with this
ETI. The aim to create eight new project proposals, involving at least
50 SMEs, is well on the way to being achieved.

Difficulties include the rush to get project proposals in to meet the


December 2004 deadline, limited openings in existing projects, and
reluctance on the part of both large and small companies to work
alongside their competitors. With a whole year to work towards
the next round of project proposals, however, Mr Peña is confident
that the future will bring success to SYNERGY.

One key objective is to carry on expanding the database of inter-


ested companies on the basis that the bigger the network, the greater
the added value for everyone. The new Member States should pro-
vide a rich hunting ground in which to find SMEs. The end result
will be cheaper, more secure and more environment-friendly ener-
gy for everyone.

Project title EC contribution


Strengthening the competitive intelligence of the European Distributed € 933 818
Energy Resources Sector (SYNERGY)
Contact person
Contract number Mr Carlos Peña
CT-2004-508508 Fundación Labein
C/Geldo – Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia
Duration Edificio 700 – 48160 Derio
18 months Spain
Tel: +34 9460 73300
Global project cost Fax: +34 9460 73349
€ 1 447 780 carlos@labein.es
www.labein.es

Project website
www.synergy-project.org

Participants
1 Fundaciòn LABEIN (ES)
2 Cluster de Energia (ES)
3 Institut für Solare Energieversorgungstechnik Verein an der
Universitat Kassel E.V. (DE)
4 Österreichisches Forschungs- und Prüfzentrum Arsenal GmbH
(AT)
5 Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
6 TECHNOFI (FR)
7 Oy Merinova Ab (FI)

Wind energy.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 44

A helping hand for biotech innovators


TALENT SCOUT

“High-tech SMEs know the value of Small biotechnology companies – often


transnational research – they just need academic spin-offs – are the innovators behind the big
more visibility.” business of diagnostic kits for healthcare, food and
environmental monitoring. But while these companies know the
value of collaborative research, they can be as reluctant to join FP6 projects
as more traditional firms. Often with just two or three people, it is not surprising they
lack the time to investigate all the options. The TALENT SCOUT project will give them a gentle
push towards new research, new funding and new customers – essential if Europe’s biotech SMEs
are to flourish. Targets include 80 new members of IPs and NoE.

Diagnostic kits based on biotechnology are big business in the food, begins with a thorough survey of the entire biotech sector. The part-
healthcare and environmental industries. Generally low in cost ners aim to target as many SMEs as possible, offer training in best
and easy to use, diagnostic kits can identify dangerous micro-organ- practices for sharing knowledge and finding funds, and to build up
isms or screen for diseases more quickly and accurately than is pos- a database listing each firm’s competences so as to increase their
sible with older laboratory-based methods. visibility to European biotech stakeholders.

Developing new diagnostic kits is scientifically challenging, but far Next, the TALENT SCOUT team wants to help existing FP6 Integrated
less capital-intensive than, for example, creating a new drug. For Projects (IPs) and Networks of Excellence (NoE) find suitable SME
this reason, many diagnostic and detection systems are devel- partners. At the same time, it will encourage the SMEs to join exist-
oped by small biotech firms, often with just a handful of staff. Many ing transnational projects and even to set up new ones, as well as
are set up to develop a single product or line of research, often as networking with one another. The result will be a more-effective and
an academic spin-off. Successful products can be licensed to the less-fragmented European biotech industry, better visibility for the inno-
big pharmaceutical firms, so these little research-intensive biotech vative SMEs at the core of diagnostics development, and faster, stead-
companies may not even need to do their own manufacturing. ier, growth for those able to tap into more sources of finance.

The snag is that small biotech companies suffer from many of the None of this is intrinsically difficult, Ms Torrisi says, because unlike
problems common to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) many of those in more traditional industries, the SMEs in question
in general. With only a few staff, the temptation is to get on with can immediately see the advantages of collaborative research. The
research rather than investigate unfamiliar and perhaps complex problem is that when time and money are in short supply, it is eas-
funding mechanisms. There may also be issues with lack of com- ier to carry on working with the people you know than to seek new
munication between the research SMEs and the large pharmaceu- partners, especially abroad. As a result, many biotech SMEs work
tical companies which will ultimately be responsible for marketing. closely with a single large company. Although they can survive like
This can result in duplication of effort, while other important this, many could grow faster if they had other customers.
research is neglected.
Squaring up to targets
Bridging the gaps The TALENT SCOUT partners
The TALENT SCOUT project aims to ease these difficulties by get- have set themselves some
ting what it calls dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs) involved in impressive numerical
collaborative research projects under the Sixth Framework targets, including
Programme (FP6). The three-year project, which began in January the profiling and
2004, brings together 12 partner organisations from eight coun- technical audit-
tries. All have experience in the management of innovation and EU-
supported transnational research projects, and some, such as
Innova, the Italian company coordinating the project, have specif-
ic expertise in biotech-based diagnostics.

Cristina Torrisi of Innova explains how TALENT SCOUT has already


made initial approaches to nearly 1 000 small biotech firms, out
of a previously mapped total of around 2 000 in Europe. The plan

Biotechnology creates opportunities for SMEs in diagnostic kits.


REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 45

ETI–1

“With one large customer you can


ing of 220 SMEs, 80 SMEs placed in IPs or NoE, and a further 50 survive. With more than one, you can
in alternative innovation initiatives such as CRAFT, STREP, Collective
think about growth.”
Research, and Transnational Technology Transfer actions. As many
SMEs as possible will be encouraged to develop their entrepreneur-
ial skills in areas such as finance, access to venture capital, technol-
ogy transfer, and intellectual property management.

The original step-by-step plan has been somewhat modified in the


light of the need to meet the deadlines for FP6 project proposals,
Ms Torrisi notes, but progress along a more parallel route has been
good so far. Work started with those SMEs that were easiest to reach
and the partners are now ‘fishing’ for more elusive companies.

Cash flow is important for all firms but especially for high-tech start-
ups, and the TALENT SCOUT project has not neglected this angle.
Promoting innovative research is all very well, says Ms Torrisi, but
if a company needs money now, that is an issue that cannot be put
off. As a result, the project is taking a holistic approach that
includes finance plans right from the start.

Project title Contact person


Talented SMEs for EU competitiveness in biotech diagnostic Ms Cristina Torrisi
applications (TALENT SCOUT) Innova S.p.A.
Via della Scrofa 117
Contract number 00186 Rome
CT-2004-508510 Italy
Tel: +39 0667 80071
Duration Fax: +39 0667 80091
36 months c.torrisi@innova-eu.net
www.innova-eu.net
Global project cost
€ 1 249 349 Project website
www.ts4biotech.net
EC contribution
€ 953 319 Participants
1 Innova SpA (IT)
2 Zentrum für Innovation und Technik in NRW GmbH (DE)
3 Instituto Andaluz de Tecnologia (ES)
4 Oxford Innovation Limited (UK)
5 Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (EL)
6 Alma Consulting Group SA (FR)
7 Inova Pro, sro (CZ)
8 Consorzio per l’Area di Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica di
Trieste (IT)
9 Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea (IT)
10 Gdansk Technology Transfer Centre (PL)
11 Cybion SrL (IT)
12 Invent SAS Innovation Ventures (FR)

A helping hand.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 46

FP6 for the other half


WomEn2FP6

“Women very rarely ask about European Women who own or manage SMEs are
research. We aim to change that.” essential contributors to Europe’s economic
competitiveness. And, while SMEs in general could do more
to increase their intellectual capital, women entrepreneurs are especially
lacking from collaborative research programmes. The WomEn2FP6 project is
tackling this shortfall, plugging into existing networks favoured by women and
approaching them in environments that help them to feel confident. The project partners are
creating an on-line database listing the capabilities of female-run firms, and aim to get around 50 women
entrepreneurs into FP6 projects they would not otherwise have considered.

Helping women entrepreneurs to get the most out of the Sixth There are three particular areas in which the WomEn2FP6 partners
Framework Programme is the aim of the WomEn2FP6 project. hope to create clusters of excellence. The first is in life sciences and
According to project coordinator Petra Püchner of the Steinbeis- healthcare, an area in which there are many self-employed women.
Europa-Zentrum in Germany, the way women go about setting up The second is the Information Society Technologies (IST) Work
and running businesses, gathering information and networking, often Programme of FP6. The third, known as ‘social economics’, is
differs from the way their male counterparts approach the same tasks. designed to attract the many women with skills in areas such as train-
The result, she says, is that women are less likely than men to take ing and transnational project management. Such ‘soft skills’ can be
advantage of the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6), even when very useful in running Integrated Projects (IPs) under FP6.
they are already running successful companies.
These clusters will give IP coordinators a wide choice of internation-
Dr Püchner is confident that WomEn2FP6 will make a difference by al partners in particular subject areas. They will also encourage con-
ensuring that women get information about FP6 through existing, tact among the women themselves – with luck, to the extent that they
familiar networks. There are plenty of successful female entrepre- will want to set up their own research projects.
neurs and scientists, so their relative absence from collaborative
research projects must mean that information about these oppor- Training the trainers
tunities is not reaching them. The organisations responsible for WomEn2FP6 meet three or four
times a year to share experiences. The partners can learn a lot from
Using the right language each other, even when they also decide to bring in outside experts.
Networking comes naturally to women, Püchner points out, but One of the two Swedish partners, for instance, is the National
often in a different way from men. Instead of meeting at the local Federation of Resource Centres for Women – an excellent source
Chamber of Commerce, women are more likely to form women-only of information on working with women. Most of the organisations
networks based around motherhood, self-employment or career have worked together before, in two FP5 projects – ProWomEn and
development. Accordingly, the first of WomEn2FP6’s eight work pack- WomenCraft – providing a strong foundation for WomEn2FP6.
ages has established a network of 15 regional partners in 11 coun-
tries. Many of the partners are used to working with women entre- The two-year project
preneurs, and all are accustomed to navigating the intricacies of FP6. did not get its for-
mal go-ahead
The next step was to use these existing networks to introduce women until May
to the funding opportunities available through FP6. Clear, jargon-free 2004, so
explanations are essential, Dr Püchner believes – the jungle of schemes match-
and programmes is confusing enough for newcomers, but non-English-
speakers in particular can be baffled by English-based acronyms.

This is followed by training sessions with regionally-based consultants.


As well as helping the women decide which FP6 programmes and
projects might be of use to them, the consultants collect information
about the women’s expertise. The plan is to publish this as a web data-
base that will make it easier to match potential project partners.

Women scientists and managers often prefer to network with other women.
© Hydrotox GmbH
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 47

ETI–1

ing the FP6 timescale has meant that many activities have had to be “Our target is to get 55 women
done in parallel, rather than in the orderly sequence originally entrepreneurs into FP6 project
planned. Nevertheless, the partners are confident that the project will
proposals.”
be able to meet its goals – more than 1 750 women entrepreneurs
contacted, 450 women trained, 175 co-operation profiles drawn up,
125 profiles matched as likely project candidates, and 55 women
entrepreneurs enrolled in FP6 project proposals.

In the end, says Püchner, what is important is to approach women


in the right way. Women entrepreneurs are already an essential part
of Europe’s economy, but many of them lack the self-confidence to
grow their businesses through international collaboration. Once they
realise the potential of FP6, experience shows that they are just as
likely as men to succeed.

WomEn2FP6’s bright idea is to tap into existing women’s networks


and to emphasise the benefits while avoiding the jargon.

Project title Contact person


Promotion of Women Entrepreneur Participation to FP6 Projects Dr Petra Püchner
(WomEn2FP6) Steinbeis-Europa-Zentrum der Steinbeis Stiftung für
Wirtschaftsförderung
Contract number Haus der Wirtschaft, Willi-Bleicher-Str. 19
CT-2004-508590 70174 Stuttgart
Germany
Global project cost Tel: +497 111 234012
€ 1 221 057 Fax: +497 111 234011
women2fp6@steinbeis-europa.de
EC contribution www.steinbeis-europa.de
€ 931 892
Project website
Duration www.women2fp6.net
24 months
Participants
1 Steinbeis-Europa-Zentrum der Steinbeis Stiftung für
Wirtschaftsförderung (DE)
2 Wirtschaftsministerium Baden-Württemberg (Ministry of Economic
Affairs for the state of Baden-Württemberg) (DE)
3 THATI GmbH – IRC (DE)
4 Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
5 IVF Industrial Research and Development Corporation (SE)
6 Swedish National Federation of Resource Centres for Women (SE)
7 Beta Technology Ltd (UK)
8 Bretagne Innovation (FR)
9 Instituto tecnológico de Aragón (ES)
10 INNOVA SpA (IT)
11 Regione dell’Umbria (IT)
12 Information Processing Centre/Osrodek Przetwarzania Informacji (PL)
13 The Brussels Enterprise Agency/Agence Bruxellois pour
l’Entreprise asbl (BE)
14 Coordination, Etudes et Recherche Action (BE)
15 TMB Hungary Technology Transfer and Software Development
Engineering Ltd (HU)

Many women entrepreneurs and scientists could benefit from collaborative


research if they knew what was available. © Ökotox GmbH
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 48

Stronger links for better business


WOODISM

“The Woodism project will help Employing more than 3 million workers across
thousands of SMEs – right across Europe Europe, industries based on forest products make up
– to link up with the best possible one of the region’s key manufacturing sectors. But, with its
partners.”
large number of highly diverse SMEs and its broad geographical
range, the sector’s success has sometimes been hindered by limited
information on new technologies and services which can improve the competitive edge
in a global market. The Woodism project – a consortium of 17 consultancies, research institutes
and technology transfer specialists from 12 EU countries – aims to benefit thousands of European
SMEs by linking them with relevant R&D projects funded under the EU’s Sixth Framework Programme.

Any competitive business needs to know what is going on in the Knowledge is power
sector. Is there an easier or cheaper way to get hold of raw mate- Throughout Europe, many SMEs in forest-based industries face
rials? What are the latest innovations in processing? And how can similar problems – cutting costs, improving products, or meeting oblig-
waste be reduced, or markets expanded? Success depends on a atory environmental standards – but limited co-operation leaves them
number of critical factors such as developing or accessing cutting- searching for their own solutions. This is time-consuming and waste-
edge developments which can improve efficiency and allow inno- ful, and ultimately affects the overall competitiveness of the whole
vative product design; taking advantage of logistical advances that sector.
reduce distribution costs or facilitate bulk buying; and accessing the
latest market intelligence to prepare for changes and fluctuations However, the EU offers plenty of opportunities to help these SMEs
in demand. But for many businesses – particularly SMEs (small and to improve their performance – including the new funds for Integrated
medium-sized enterprises) with limited resources – filling informa- Projects and Networks of Excellence which are designed to gen-
tion gaps can be tricky. This is where the new Woodism project plans erate new intelligence while overcoming the fragmented nature of
to help out. European research. Whether it is through funding R&D into a spe-
cific problem, or facilitating information flows on relevant solutions,
The project’s basic aim is to help SMEs contribute to, and stay on top these opportunities are key to helping SMEs perform well in an
of, new developments in their sector by helping them to access the increasingly competitive global market.
opportunities available to them under FP6. Offering an ‘easy way to
access co-operation’, the project hopes to link SMEs with each other, By creating functional groupings of SMEs, the Woodism project
and with the relevant research community. This, in turn, will stimulate hopes to facilitate cheaper, more efficient production, development and
and facilitate SME participation in new and ongoing EU-funded distribution of wood and fibre products. By linking SMEs directly
R&D projects that specifically address their existing research needs. with researchers, it expects to improve knowledge transfer – on prod-
ucts, processes, services and markets – and by collecting and storing
Building on the earlier success of the Inwood project, also funded feedback in a highly accessible form, its aim is to improve the EU’s
by the European Union Framework Programmes, the Woodism con- research programmes to better meet their users’ needs. The anticipat-
sortium brings together industry and science to combine expertise ed result is a dramatic improvement in the
in business advice and innovation transfer, wood products research development, exchange and
and education. By offering a range of complex services which iden- assimilation of process
tify knowledge gaps and improve research collaboration and infor- and business innova-
mation flows, the project is geared towards promoting innovation tions which
within the sector, improving co-operation throughout Europe, and improve business
strengthening links between the research and business communi- success across
ties. The overall goal is to use the opportunities on offer under FP6 Europe.
to ensure effective research and information exchange which will
allow European SMEs to maintain and improve their competitive
edge.

Silver birch is the


most important hardwood
species in Fenno-Scandia and
is used for high-quality paper,
furniture and construction.
REC4 6100_ETI 2.2 20/07/05 15:26 Page 49

ETI–1

The project will offer a number of services to achieve these goals. “The project will help SMEs get the best
These include: carrying out technology audits which identify SME out of Europe – and Europe to get the
needs and solutions; developing an overview of FP6 projects rele-
best out of its SMEs.”
vant to forest-based industries; providing an interface for matching
SMEs with research projects; disseminating information across the
sector; and training SME personnel to participate in FP6 projects.

Stimulating change Contact person


In addition to the direct benefits of linking problems (faced by SMEs) Prof. Tarmo Luoma
with solutions (provided by R&D), the Woodism project team is hop- Työtehoseura ry
ing that improved innovation within the wood-based industries Melkonkatu 16 A
leads to increased wood use in the construction, energy and other Helsinki 28
key sectors. Such changes could have significant implications for 00211 Finland
Europe. Greater use of wood in the construction industry could be Tel: +358 9 2904 1200
important in terms of carbon storage while reducing the impacts gen- tarmo.luoma@tts.fi
erated by alternative construction materials. Meanwhile, innovations
in technologies using bio-fuels could help to address the urgent issue Participants
of Europe’s ever-increasing energy demand. Given their potential 1 Silicon Fibres (FI)
significance in relation to climate change, such developments 2 Bureau for International Research and Technology
could lead to enormous benefits for Europe in the long term. Cooperation (AT)
3 RDT Talos Ltd (CY)
Project title 4 Archimedes Foundation (ET)
Improving competitiveness of the forest-wood chain by support- 5 Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten
ing SME participation in FP6 projects (WOODISM) Forschung (DE)
6 Zentrum für Innovation und Technik in Nordrhein Westfalen
Contract number GmbH (DE)
CT-2004-508617 7 Elkede Technology and Design Centre (EL)
8 Hellenic Organization of SMEs and Handicraft (EL)
Duration 9 Innovawood (IE)
36 months 10 Agenzia per la promozione della ricerca europea (IT)
11 Innova SpA (IT)
Global project cost 12 Europarama UAB (LT)
€1 461 397 13 Cracow University of Technology (PL)
14 Wood Industry Cluster (SV)
EC contribution 15 Euroresearch / Réseau Suisse d’innovation (CH)
€1 046 691 16 Berner Fachhochschule – Hochschule für Architektur, Bau und
Holz (CH)

You might also like