Schiller Park Police Department

1. DATE/TIME OF REPORT: 2. DATE/TIME OF ORIGINAL REPORT 3. CASE Nl'MBER

30 Oct 06/1530 5 May 06/0947 06-3219
I. ORIGINAL OFFENSE OR INCIDENT 5. CT-ASSIFICATION 6. OFFENSE CHANGED TO
Computer Tampering Felony Same
7. VICTIMS NAJVIE 8. VICTIMS ADDRESS. _ 9. P H O N E ( H O M E )
Save-A-Life Foundati 9950 Lawrence Av. #300 SP. 847-928-968.1
10. DEFENDANTS NAME I I . DEFENDANTS ADDRESS 12. PHONE (HOME)
Melongo, Annabel K. 1218 Long Valley Dr. 630-220-4132 Unk
13. IF ARREST MADE PHOTO COI'RT DATE/LOCATION
□ LQ. 16. LEADS Nl'MBER
U PROPERTY RF.CO\ ERED lS.AMOl'NT

17. CLEARED 18. RADIO OPERATOR 19. DATE AND TIME

20. STATl'S
CLEARED E l I'NFOl'NDEPQ ADMIN CLEARED □ FAIL TO PROSECT'TE Q FURTHER ACTION Y'ES □ NO |
121 N V R R A T I Y E R«oidhae»Bdrtdii|miakUu*1iKca«inb«qoealto)ht«fc«MottoMlBUatltpoil l > ^ n l * u>di«c<d vahw of any piopaty itcovcied. rianies Mid aiinl muiit-eii i>f
any pei&ona utesled If offense classification u dunked. explain why Indicate dead}' disposition of piopeily lecoveted and show piopeity wvenloiy mNubcf if in police
("■iSCSSlOll

ignecLthe initial case report 06-3219 reporting an incident o f Computer

[Tampering R/I received copies o f the emails that had Keen sent t o and from I _
account The headers o n the emails showed that the offender had forwarded the sin
from M s Spi7.?irri's account «o the Yahoo email account o f melongo
contacted Yahoo Subpoena Compliance Department and left them a message to contact R/T in
iefeience_10-this investigation.

8 M a y 06- I lit, who advised R / l t o fax

a-px i Y a h o o asking for a snapshot o f the Yahoo account at the time the fay was
received and t o advised them that a suhpoena w i l l he forthcoming

9 M a y 0 6 - Pet Henn #77 fayed the preservation letter t o Yahoo asking Yahoo to preserve the
t r d s o f melongoannahellglyahoo c o m and take a snapshot o f the account for the last
thirty days and all days that f o l l o w until they receive the suhpoena

06-RZL w i t h Comcast Cahle Services 1 egal department ahoiit how t o obtain the
rmatinn related to the I P address that was found in the header o f thq emails
ed t o the Y a h o o account in question and was_assigned t o the offender's computer at
■the time o f the intrusion t o Save-A-I.ife's computer R/T was advised that R/I would need t o fay them
a preservation letter also and then a subpoena t o f o l l o w in order f o r Comcast t o release
information to R/I

16 May 0 6 - R/I and I t Schnbe #30, met with Kyle French o f the Illinois Attorney
in reference t o this investigation M r French advised that he was available t o
investigation and JiajLalr£ajdy_seiiLpresejvaiiQn requests to Y a h o o ^ C o
ic Internet found that the snspcciyMs. Annabel Melongo,-

Iniversity M r French felt that it may he necessary for R/I t o send another preservation letter t o
t t o Comcast-
R/I and I t Sr.hu for M s Melongo 1718 F«st L o n g 1
Apt #3 A , in Palatine IT. M s Melongo's name was on the mailbox hut her vehicle was j
assigned-parking space.

et-with Robert Barnes and-Vincent Davis of Save-A-Life

Name Star 2 9 Date/Time 30 Oct 06/1530

Schiller Park Police 2000 Case# 06-3219 Page I
 Schiller Park Police Department ■Supplementary Case # 06-3219
able to give RZLmQreJnfDrmatioji abouLSav
stem Mr Rames informed R/I that the, limes noted Qnthcserver logs areJoc
[thai the system has automatic daylight savings time adjustment M L Barnes also gaye R/I more
suspect, Ms Melnngo Mr Barnes stated that Ms Melongo had no_prior
ilnyment was terminated, M s
Melongo had no further ar. the computers from within the hnilding and that an emr.
named Christian changed all of the pass codes in eacJLQf-lhe servers after she left the hnilding Mr
Rarnes stated he had no knowledge nf Ms Melnngn having any_olher email accounts other that the
hut stated that she does have a laptop that she uses from time to time Mr
[Rarnes also stated that he knew the suspect was aatudentat Roostivelt.IJniversity Mr Barnes also,
believed the intrusion-lo-the come iw_through theweLviaihe_c
email server hut he wa^uriSUI£aaiaJlOW.thisJIiay.Jiav Lbecause
the DSI. lines from the servers after | sit^minateiLl
that the computer system's auto hackiip program was : to begin at 03?5
[hayeJricked the suspect out of the server jiLthatJime
I tliat S A L F i s
olved in wjth Robert Half and that the suspect was not one of them that he knew of Mr
Davi s believed the suspect had heen monitoring SALF management's email for some time. Mr Davia
also gave R/l the name nf the person who they called to repair 1
Technology Solutions

rilical Technology Solutions and spoke with Don Peters,.

the. pry rsstatedJhat on 1 May 06, he was contracted hy SAI F t o
attempt t o perform data es on SAIF's two computer servers Mr Peters advised
hy Ms. ile personnel attempted recovery on the drives prior t o |
ould be questionable due
was to move forward with the
mplete or missing. R/T asked

[Mr. Peters also sent an email to R/T documenting the conversation he liad with Ms .Spizzirri and her
employe :covery.vs. evidence preservation^

R/I then contacted Roosevelt University R/I .spoke with the. C1Q of the I Jni versify, who
advised R/I that the suspect is a student there and that she does have an email account
amelQngQ@roosevelf edu He did state.thaLhe could notpmvideJI/Lwithany_Qlher information
about theirj

[advised to speak to.Mike, the owner of the company. MilainfhrmedJ£ZIihat the company should
have the IP addresses.o£any.computer accessing his company's servers and that he would send R/I
the information collected for the dates.oflheintru.sions

18 MayD6-_R/I received the.fax from Mr.feters, whichwaaa copy of the recovery overview that he

Dell server and described the reasons for the inability to recoveranyJiles from the Sony server

Alii 'I was contacted hy Ms Spi?7irn wh

iinauthor] j m i h e company's American Express t_ MsJipizzirri advised H/L
card account information: itainedxm ihe_server priorjoJiie

Star 29 Date/Time 30 Oct 06/1 5 3 0

Schiller Park Police 2000 Case #06-3219 Page 2
 Schiller Park Police Department Supplementary Case # 06-3219
atrol officer to S Al F lr> take the report from Ms Spizzirri Refer
8Qfi=3714_

19 May OftnJB/Lrftceived a copy of the report made hy Ms Spizzirri on I8 May 06 R/I then.
contacted American Express fraud J i R n h Cnn-an w h o stated he w f
R/I a ropy of the account activity for the dates of 13 May 06 to 18 Mav 06.

R/I then contacted EBay's Fraud Investigation Team ahont the charge tc F AmEx account.
R/I was advised that M s Melongo did have an ac i them .but there been no purchases
QvexJil4 made on the account.

_R/Iihen.sentanj r information about. J

lion thaloccurred-on 18 May i .R/I .was later
of the transaction record which showed all of the information the offender had to enter in order to
opletelhe transaction, along with, the j attemptedta purchase from
Amazon com

.R/I_theaattemptedin chants listed On the AmEx account activity

LthatRZLreceiyedfrom Mr Curran. R/I was ahle.to reach a c
ay Inr The representative Amanda advised R/I that she_had
-.nnt niimher dating hack to 7003 R/I J| to T.
stomer research department Tasha was al J£/I_with the ship to name and
address of lonLSmilly 1QQ£ynthia L a , GlendaleJieights, IT,, and a phone niimher of 630-369-S489
The hill to name was Carol Spizzirri with a phone number of 847-829-2968 Tasha stated that the
■offender purchased 13 items that were expedited via Fed Ex and according to Old Navy's records thfil
package was left at the door for pickiip and not signed for Tasha fiirfher stated that four of the i t e m „
nrchased were gift cards that for some unknown reason were never activated hy the shipper and will
le toJje activated Tasha stated that if R/I needed more information about the transaction
R/T would have to fax a snhpoena to the charge hack department of Old Navy

R/I then contacted United Airlines, hut got ho answer at their fraud department R/I then
[attempted to contactTriple CrownPuhlishing, GifLCertifk Itants,
BakersEootwear, and Carson Pirie Scottin refere Lanly able!
to leave messages with these merchants

R/I_ihenconIa£led M s .Spizzirri and asked if she knew a Toni Smith in Glendale Heights which she
did not, • or not she recognized a n y n f j e numbers that were associ ththe
IraudulenLtransactions.

22_May 06- R/I spoke with Susan Rnstick of Bakers Shoes ahont the frai ctionlhat had
occurred onlineiuU7.May.Q6 at 18 38 05 POT on their website Ms Bostick stat
Lof.the order-detail form showing the items.piirchased-alaag-witb. hilling and snipping
on. Ms._Bostick also advised R/I that the shipment had not yetheeashippedlQ thexustomer
because her fraud departmenLflagged the order as possibly being fraudulent R/I then asked for her J
not to ship ihfLilems so that R/I could contact E e d E x i n a n attempiio set up a controlled delivery
Ms.. Bostick stated that she would have tospeak to her superiors before she could authorize the use
of the merchandise for the delivery
JR/I then railed fonsiimerinfo corn's customer service department and spoke with 3_
^aliy£jiajned Rose Rose, advised R/l that the $1 charge otiihe SALE AmEx a,

Star 2 9 Date/Time 3 0 Oct 06/1 5 3 0

Schiller Park Police 2000 Case #06-3219 Page 3
 Schiller Park l'olice Department -Supplementary Case # 06-3219
|preanthori7ation charge and the $5 charge was for a credit score for a particular individuaLilQSE
not give R/I any fiirther information hut she could give it t o the customer (i e
1-SAT.F) without a siihpoena R/T then left a message for Ms Spizzirri requesting that she contact
Consumer Tnfo asking for any and all information that was disseminated to the offender
R/I again left messages with the other merchants requesting they, contact R/l in reference tn
the fraudulent charges involving SAT F's AmFx account R/I, using varJQus.dataha.ses, was able to
research the address of 700 Cynthia I n in Glendale Heights, along with the phone numbers giventQ_
Amazon and Rakers Shoes as contact numbers and the name Toni Smith R/l found no connection to
SAI.F at that time

23 May 06- R/T received an email from Mr French that contained the Grand Jury Subpoena.request
Comcast and Yahoo com R/l then converted the
[so that R/L could fax them to the state's-attoraey'

an investigator for-Experian Credit Bureau _Mr Henry.

Ms Spizzirri who had contacted Fxperian in reference
is owned by Fxperian Mr Henry explained the charges to R/T
also gave R/l the name of the person whose
credit R/l the name of Saquan fiholar and advised R/l that the
snhject lives in Illinois Mr Henry could not give R/I any fiirther information without a siihpoena Mr
Henfy explained that with a siihpoena, R/I could ohtain more demographic
addresyphysical address, his mother's_maiden name and his actual date of hirth
YS and was able to ohtain a photo of Mr Gholar

May 06- R/T received the response to R/I's request for the Grand Jury subpoenas R/l then faxed |
|the subpoena to Comcast cahle services requesting information on the assigned Internet account of
[two of their IP addresses for the dates of the intrusion and the purchase fc
siihpoena was sent to Comcast requesting any account information for Ms Melongo and her address |
p»f I21R Fast I onp Valley Dr Apt #3 A in Palatine II
^t of TuHge Tohin who signed a request for a search warrant to he served
on Yahoo com requesting; JUIIII aniJ t
search warrant to Yahoo legal compliance

5 J u n 06- R/l received a response '

records for the IP address of 74 IS 20? 102 for the dates and tiinesj* iinplete
or contained an error associated with the cahle modem or other device Therefore. they couldjiot-
11 anyinfbnnation.as.ta which of their customers had that IP address at the times of the
into -SAIFs servers : lalhe_subpoena.fbr account i
Long Valley Palatine, IL, Comcast.slated.
responsive.to R/I's request In response t : inforrnatiorifhrJILaddress
af.HJ)7 72 196 on 17 May 06_at20 1 eR/l thenaineonil
Andrea Sr acLaddress of 229 S 14th Ave. Apt #J, Maywood, n . 60153, a telephone
number of 7Q8r269_-_2968_ Along with J idresses ofttspears4@comcast.net and
wookie91@comcast net, anda-Comcast account number of 8798200010470727,

7 lun 06- R/I contacted Comcast IP Services ahout them not having any information for Ms
I two separate s
in order fo earch just the name and/or just the address_R/Llheii.|

Star 2 9 Date/Tiiue 30 Oct 06/1 5 3 0

Schiller Park Police 2000 Case #06-3219 Page 4
 Schiller Park Police Department .Suppiememary Case # 06-3219
requested and faxed them tr le's-Attorney's ilH go in front of the
Grand Jury on 8 Jim 06. .
R/I, along with Pet Koch
■^jtm*...,,.
#11 went to ??9- ,S. 14th
. , , » . ■ ■ . . . . > . . . — . - >w ■ ■
Ave— .in. . ■Maywood, TT. and ranga the hell
■ — } - . — ■■-.-■■

IhuLgol no answer R/I wrote down several license plates of .vehicles parkedJn front of the I
ran those plates hut none came hark to AnHrea Smith ft/I did a check of Andrea E
[through various databases and found a photo of an F/R that had an address o£U4_S. 12th St in—
Maywood, IT. The phone number gjyenJw Comcast came hack to a cell phone owned hy^BeltyL
Spears.
R/I was contacted hy Mr Barnes from SALP Mr Barnes stated that the compa
nil was _miim.icu \iy mi—umui;,i mini j n i . r ITII—uni nt.,i ,-iimi.ii mm tin. ni"ii|'u"j iirimii nu
inanthorized automated clearing house (ACH) debit on the company's Chase Rank account monthly
statement The ACH dehit was to Comcast in the amount of S20Q.0Q on 22 May 06 Mr. Barnes then
faxed R/I a ropy of the hank statement showing the dehit in question along with the form sent to him
wingjhf deputed charge R/I contacted Chase Rank's Fraud Department in order to
e information ahont the transaction R/I spokeio IerjyJWQiking_who advised R/l that she 1
tell for sure whether ■* was a rher.lr hy phone transaction or if the o
[the payment in person at the Comcast Rill Payment Center Ms Working ditLstate that the hank was_\
in the process of refunding the money to S A I F s account
RZI then contacted Comcast Customer Service The representative that R/I spoke
khat she too could not give an indication how the hilLwas paid hut did State.lhe_acCQunLthat the
payment was applied to was in the i LS 14th Ave, in May

9 J u n 06- R/I went hack to Ms Melongo's address in Palatine but again got naanswer at the door
andlhere wa 1 parking space

14 Inn 06- R/I and Pet Koch went to 77Q S 14th Ave in Maywood TT. hut again got no answer at
the door.

'I and Del Koch went to the address of 700 Cynthia l.n , in Glendale. Heights R/I wrot<
|down several license plates of the vehicles in the driveway at that location and parked in front of the
home

20 Jim 06^011 again went to Ms Melongo's apartment hnilding in an attempt to speak with her, hut
again got no answer

\2\ Jun 06-AZI did_a_check^oflhe Jicejise^platesobtained from ihe^address in Glendale Heights One of
the plates registered to a Reachelle Spears at that address Ms Spears has ;
background!
R/I also contacted the State's Aiioriiey'^-Qfliceinjeference to the last siihpoena reqi.
[were faxed.to them on 7 Tun 06 R/I was advised that they never_received thoscjioxuments and.
therefore R/I had to resend them
'I received the response
|lP_address for Ms Melongo's Yahoo tJogin at 71 46 03 GMT on 27 Apr 06 as.hfiirjg_
24 15.2Q2.1Q2. EachJime Ms Melongo's yahoo acco
at 16:47:23 GMTJUiadlhaLspecific JJrladdress.
JYahoo's account management tool showed all Ms Melongo's.
lh.Jts_creauQndate,..7May 2QQ0yAnd the dates and times thai passwonLwas-

Star 29 Date/Time 30 Oct 06/1 5 3 0

Schiller Hark Police 2000 Case #06-3219 Page 5
 Schiller Park Police Department Supplementary Case # 06-3219
Qccurred.on A MayJ MJ5-2Q2-IQ2.
response (on CD-R) was the contents of the account's briefcase and a snaps!
■ontenls at the time the preservation letter was received
overed from the Yahoo hriefcase was Ms Melongo's resume, showing
5 . Another file recovered was a letter that appeared tn he written]
to some X-rated emails heing sent to aProfessor Oguz. The
tion m e d hy a 7anyah Waite The letter was signed
Iwroteihat i-JWaite for heing bias and personality conflicts
sending Professor
_RZL elt I Jniver
staffLR/L !iat name R/T tr
'ity. where Ms Melongo's resume stared she
12000 to Marrh 700? R/T spoke with Sgt leach at the 11 of M-KC Campus Police Department Sgt. |
I each arlvised R/I that the university HiH have a Professor Oguy and he was somewhat familiar wil
theinves fax R/T a copy of the
reports for the incident and also have the professor contact R / I for further information-,
1910 ho z. Professor Oguz
rememher the Melongo was not charged, j
hei nt the i
and herxoommate. re both signed in to the University's email server at the exact time
that the emails wi [le professor

28 Inn 06- R/l faxed Y to the search warr;

to Mr. Fxench_w iad_sent him
reviewing the he anrl his hoss believed that with this new information, men
enough evidence against Ms Melongo. for a search warrant for her home could he issued Mr French |
varrant I so that R/I co
signed hy a judge on S Till 06 If the warrant was signed Mr French would ax
accompanied hy Immigration Customs Enforcement and personneLfri
•tying the warrarrtmJuar.2JuLQ_6.

the subpoenas signed hy the Grand Jury on 29 Tun 06-RZLlhen faxed them to
[Tomcast requesting account information for the ACH debit transaction
R/l also had not received t
him a message to contact R/I

lQJuLQ.6- R/I called Mr-Jrench in reference to the search warrant for Ms.-.Melongo.'s apartment Mr
Erenchjjtated that his hoss reviewed his initial draft and stated thaLiineededmorairdbrj
R/I then emailed Mr. French a copy of this report for him to refer to for the required information Mr
that lie would attempLlnget R/l the search warrant hy 14 Jul 06

2 Jiilfl6-R/ljEceived-axall from Sharma Austin at ComcasLCable.Ms, Austin stated thatlhere

ardashowed the date of the ACH debit A }6_and not 22 May as stated in the_
subpoena she received R/l explained to her that t statement showed
posted to the account OIK22 May and that v in on the subpoena M s I

r^?i Star 29
Schiller Park Police 2000
Date/Time 3 0 Oct 06/1 5 3 0
Case #06-3219 Page 6
 Schiller Park Police Department Supplementary Case # 06-3219
dlsforup to tv
to. 14 May 06 after her exit interview OXLZZ Apt Q6. Ms. Jaimed she was cliec
il account and did nnt change any settingsrmsystem isswords Ms. Melongo also
|admitted In viewing Ms Spjyyirri's emails in which Ms. Spizzixj jlamed.Ms Melongo for the
i computer_systcms_After she viewed
inse emails t o

that SAI.F was in the process of.

and thai they no longer needed her si May Q6 M" Melongo stated
M s Spizyirri in response tn M s S Ms Melnngn fnr the system px
Melnngn stated. that "he had access tn .SAT.F's entire computer sysiem_and was responsih
[everything computer related Ms Melongo stated that hei.replac,ement,-Ciirisiian, was hired thre
weeks hefnre she was fired She helieves that she was_fited because Christianagre
money to do the same jnh as she hut that he did not have the same networking skills as she did.
When asked about her residency she claimed that she has lived in Palatine for app
until i
[she switcher! tn SRC Yahon DSL as hex current ISP. Prior to moving to Palatine,.she lived in
ad_Naperville_
fsheJcnew a Tanya Spears, Ms. Melongo stated for
|S AT .Fat the front desk Ms Melongo also stated that she had spoken with Ms. Spears
two weeks ago in reference to a computer problem Ms Spears had at her
M s , Spears hack about assisting hex
ed ahnnt SAI.F and their company purchases, Ms Melongo stated ncednre
made through requisitions to Ms Spiyyirri and nn _else. Ms Melongn [
[stated that SAT.F's servers contained hnsiness forms, pictures etc , and that lip_
Oy department. Fven though she was the system administrator, she claimed
ig or executive file tree Ms Melnngn stated lhat
[designed the file security system fnr SAI.F from input and aiithnriyatinn nf Ms Spi/.zirri Ms
Melongo_also staled. SAI F hank accounts nr credit
That information yees in the accounting de
stated rmationwere Dane, Ms Snirairri,
Nawaxa^fjllNawara F; &X7Q8r4J8r71 QQ).iyfc_MelongQ showed R/I a hiis.ines,s_card.„.
from Mx„Nawaja and cla was told by Ms. Spizzirri to give him
W F servers: vas; iy.accesslhe servers for the
.Melongo i imenshel i remotely
L immediately SpizzirrL
When asked if she knew a Saqnan fiholar Ms Melnngn stated that Mr Ghnlar was an employee at
SAI.F in the education department Ms Melr
she had no contact with him since she had heen fired
After R/I concluded theioie ider arrest at that time
and that R/L wouldJiexn^contact wiihJ the evidence had heen processed All of ihe
had heen seized wa placed in the

Qet Koch #11, cnllected the electronic/computer eviri

h Chicago, Tl. The Reginnal Computer Forensics I ah tn he pre
ter evidence recovery technician R/I's rnelJwilLM^Monge and_Ms Haqqani there,

N a m c ^ ^ - ^ ^ r SUr 2 9 Date/Time 30 Oct 06/1 5 3 0

Schiller Park Police 20(X) Case #06-3219 Page i
 Schiller Park Police Department Supplementary Case #
anrLreleasexLthe items tn Ma M n n g e so Mini she could process the item
this incident R/f harl her sign the Schiller Park Property Inventory ConlroLSheetshnM
o f custody n f the evidence

?R Sep 06- R/I was contacted hy Ms

gnhmitteH was complete and the report and the items were_teady to hy returned ta R/l R/T and B e t —
(Cnch went to t h e R T F I in Chicago and recovered the items frnrn M s M r n i y R/T's then hronght the
evidence hack- to SPPD where it was returned laihe_eviileiice locker for safe keeping
R/l then made fl_mnjL»f_Ms-Monge^LCQ¥ejiletter and forensic report.summary frnni_
the m she provided R/l The summary showed that M s Melongo did access.tlte RAT.F s s u e i
remotely had a Comcast TP address o f ?4 1^ 9(1? 103 on ?R Apr 06 having access t i l M s . Spimirri's.
;wojrd^emails.OU her Roosevelt University email account with references to
F a w o r d document containing the name Sarjtian Ghnlar, IP addn
with SAI.F Scantron System images from the SAT F wehsite,.database items f r o n i l l i e , S A t . F server

11 D e l 0 6 - R/T spoke with M r French from the Illinois A f f s Office. M r . French advised that he has
coordinated a meeting helween himself, ASA Riestek, and R/l, sn that ASA Riesiek could review all
n f t h e evidence and t o determine if there is enough evidence tn charge M s Melnngo w i t h a felony in
tllis case

V) Oct 0 6 - R / I along with M r French and Ms Monjse, met w i t h ASA Riestek i n reft
case After reviewing all p f the evenl.s related tn this case, ASA Riestek approved t w o
Computer Tampering against M s Melongo ,

fvf.s M e l o n g o which were reviewed for aCCUracyhy.ASA Riestek ASA Riestek advised R/l t o
attempt f o make contact w i t h M s Melongo some lime today I f R/T is nnahle to make contact w i t h
her, ASA Riestek a otified and he would make arraignments tn have an arresl warrant
sworn out against Ms Melongo on 3 I Oct 06
R/T and D e l K o c h then went tn I nnahle to make co
there R/t's did however sp r landlord Th in Ring C whn stated that M s Melongo had .
recently informed him that she I I al the end i
three._month& hehind on her rent M r Chin.alsfl J stated.that.hfi.kiie.w_lhal M s Melongo had a part . t i m e
joh at a place called Children's W o r l d in Harrington R/I's attempted to locale Children's W o r l d hut
re unsuccessful R/l then contacted ASA Riestek and informed him o f R/I's results A S A Ripstek
advised R / l l o hring M s SpiT-jim to coirrl on 11 Oct 06 in order for Ms Spi?7Jm io sign the
complaints and have an arrest warrant issued for M s Melongo R/l then contacted Ms Spi?7Jrri and
made arraignments w i t h h e r to go hefore a judge Oil 11 Oct On" t o sign the complaints

Cas£.clased_

s 29
^^J-^/^r '" " Date/Time 30 Oct 06/1 5 3 0
Pagev
Schiltet Park Police 2000 Case # 0 6 - 3 2 1 9