Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effects of Incorporating a Word Processor Into a Year Three Writing Program
Camille Maydonik
36428084
determine if the use of word processing can assist the writing process with young
children, specifically seven Year Three students in Australia. Beck and Fetherston
(2003) state that, “Learning to write in the primary classroom is essential if young
children are to become literate members of society” (p.140) and this argument forms the
are used?
The study took place over a period of six weeks and the students, who were
pencil and paper writing activities as well as using the word processor, more specifically,
Story Board Weaver Deluxe software. Beck and Fetherston (2003) completed a case
study for each student in their study using interviews and observations as their main
research methodology.
Beck and Fetherston (2003) conclude that their study proves that the use of word
processing improves students’ writing overall and benefits their overall creativity and
motivation during writing activities. They report their results by answering the three
guiding research questions and present findings related to other results such as the effect
of prior computing experience, keyboard skills, the use of pictures for writing, changes in
INCORPORATING A WORD PROCESSOR 3
neatness, creativity, time management, the software package and gender differences.
research methods, presents a logical argument and is well organized, clear, and easy to
read. However, there are some discrepancies. The most important term in their article is
“word processor” and unfortunately they do not define it clearly and, furthermore,
consider a software package to function in the same way. In addition, they use the terms
sufficient evidence for Beck and Fetherston’s arguments and findings. First of all,
because the group of students they observed was so small, I do not believe that their
findings could be correlated to other similar groups of students in the western world.
Secondly, I presume that the audience of their article would be other primary years
teachers, such as myself. However, they do not present and refute opposing points of
view, which had me wondering if there was an ulterior motive to the purpose of their
study. These questions aside, this article helped me to understand the subject, students
contribution to the field of primary years education. Beck and Fetherston’s (2003)
statement, “A word processor, if implemented into the curriculum should not be used
merely in isolation to perform unrelated tasks, or used as a reward tool” (p. 141) evokes a
response from me in that technology, and word processors in this case, hold the potential
Reference:
Beck, N., & Fetherston, T. (2003). The effects of incorporating a word processor into a
Annual, 139-161.