Professional Documents
Culture Documents
City of Greensboro
September 7, 2010
FROM: Captain C.E. Cherry, Commanding Officer, Patrol Bureau, Eastern Division
On or about August 9, 2010, Officer M.D. Royal was suspended without pay by then Interim
Chief D.K. Crotts. This suspension is based upon Officer Royal supposedly being untruthful
during a polygraph test.
On August 27, 2010, Officer R. Reyes, who had also been suspended without pay, had a General
Board of Inquiry. Officer Reyes had been charged with a possible violation of Greensboro Police
Department Directive 1.5.3, Truthfulness.
Officer Reyes was reinstated on August 30, 2010. Officer Reyes was cleared of the allegation of
Truthfulness against him. Information in Officer Reyes’ General Board of Inquiry, in addition to
Officer Reyes’ reinstatement, clearly shows that Officer Royal should have been reinstated on
August 30, 2010, along with Officer Reyes. That information is as follows:
• Officer D.A. Pinson was found to be unequivocally lying during Officer Reyes’ General
Board of Inquiry. The subsequent investigation of Officer Pinson that newly appointed
Chief Miller should order, resulting in Officer Pinson’s termination, will also confirm
information found in Officer Reyes’ General Board of Inquiry.
• The fact that Officer Pinson was found to be unequivocally lying clearly confirms
Officer Reyes and Officer Royal were being truthful.
• The polygraph given to Officer Royal was in violation of a number City Policies,
Departmental Directives and Departmental Policies, procedurally, morally and ethically.
The polygraph was discriminatory, retaliatory, harassing, intimidating, hostile and unfair.
Corporal Oligmueller and Sergeant Isom did the following:
1
Lied to Officer Royal in an attempt to get Officer Royal to change his statement
Gave Officer Pinson a polygraph, knowing that Officer Pinson had taken medication
approximately an hour before the test because Officer Pinson was feeling anxious
• After newly appointed Chief Miller views Officer Royal’s polygraph recording and
investigates all supervisory personnel (especially Assistant Chief Crotts) involved with
this mistreatment of Officer Royal, proper action should be taken.
Mr. Young, please understand that on September 1, 2010, Chief Miller was officially installed. It
is now September 7, 2010. Officer Royal should have been reinstated relating to his unwarranted
suspension at least on August 30, 2010.
You ignored my warning to not bring in a new Chief of Police until these discriminatory,
retaliatory, harassing, intimidating, unfair practices were properly investigated and redressed.
Chief Miller, has now become complicit in these matters as of September 1, 2010. I spoke to
Officer Royal on September 7, 2010, at approximately 1:00pm. Officer Royal informed me that
he had not yet been reinstated. Please have Chief Miller immediately reinstate Officer Royal by
5:00pm on Wednesday September 8, 2010. Please have his full back pay check available as
Officer Royal has a two (2) month old child.
It is my belief that Assistant Chief Crotts understands the dilemma of reinstating Officer Royal
without a General Board of Inquiry, after Officer Royal has been suspended over two (2) weeks
without pay. The diabolically sinister Assistant Chief Crotts will soon place newly appointed
Chief Miller in an untenable situation if you do not address these and other matters immediately.
2
• Direct Chief Miller to view the INHUMANE video recording of Officer Royal’s
polygraph and investigate all individuals involved to include ultimately, the
diabolically sinister Assistant Chief Crotts.