UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
, ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) No. 1:10-cv-0897-RJL)LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR a/k/a “Larry Sinclair”, )
, ))Defendants. ))
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO BOOKS-A-MILLION MOTION TO STRIKE
Plaintiffs, Daniel Parisi (“Parisi”), Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC(“WNL”), and White House Communications Inc. (“WCI”) (collectively referred to as“plaintiffs”), oppose the motion to strike filed by defendant Books-A-Million, Inc. (“BAM”).Paragraphs 4-17 and 20-24 of the Declaration of Richard J. Oparil and Exs. 1-14 and 17-21 arematerial to the issues raised in BAM’s motion to dismiss the claim, including the assertion, basedon an allegation in another case, that BAM had nothing to do with the synopsis of the defamatorybook BAM sold. Motions to strike are generally disfavored.
New York City Employees Retirement Sys. v. Berry
, 667 F. Supp. 2d 1121, 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2009).Moreover, the facts set forth in the Declaration and the exhibits are relevant to plaintiffs’argument that if the Court were to find that some or all of the claims are subject to dismissal,plaintiffs should be granted leave to file a amended complaint. BAM’s reply did not set forthany argument as to why such leave should not be granted, let alone make any showing as to thefive factors that are taken into account to assess the propriety of a motion for leave to amend:bad faith, undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, futility of amendment, and whether the
Case 1:10-cv-00897-RJL Document 54 Filed 09/22/10 Page 1 of 3