You are on page 1of 152

Point-to-Point Wireless Communication (I):

Digital Basics, Modulation, Detection, Pulse


Shaping

Shiv Kalyanaraman
Google: “Shiv RPI”
shivkuma@ecse.rpi.edu

Based upon slides of Sorour Falahati, A. Goldsmith,


& textbooks by Bernard Sklar & A. Goldsmith
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
1 : “shiv rpi”
The Basics

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


2 : “shiv rpi”
Big Picture: Detection under AWGN

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


3 : “shiv rpi”
Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN)
‰ Thermal noise is described by a zero-mean Gaussian random process,
n(t) that ADDS on to the signal => “additive”
‰ Its PSD is flat, hence, it is called white noise.
‰ Autocorrelation is a spike at 0: uncorrelated at any non-zero lag

[w/Hz]

Power spectral
Density
(flat => “white”)

Autocorrelation
Function
Probability density function (uncorrelated)
(gaussian) Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

4 : “shiv rpi”
Effect of Noise in Signal Space
‰ The cloud falls off exponentially (gaussian).
‰ Vector viewpoint can be used in signal space, with a random noise vector w

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


5 : “shiv rpi”
Maximum Likelihood (ML) Detection: Scalar Case

“likelihoods”

Assuming both symbols equally likely: uA is chosen if

Log-Likelihood => A simple distance criterion!


Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
6 : “shiv rpi”
AWGN Detection for Binary PAM

pz (z | m2 ) pz (z | m1 )

s2 s1
ψ 1 (t )
− Eb 0 Eb

⎛ s1 − s 2 / 2 ⎞
Pe (m1 ) = Pe (m2 ) = Q⎜ ⎟
⎜ N /2 ⎟
⎝ 0 ⎠
⎛ 2 Eb ⎞
PB = PE (2) = Q⎜⎜ ⎟

⎝ N0 ⎠
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
7 : “shiv rpi”
Bigger Picture
General structure of a communication systems
Noise
Transmitted Received Received
Info. signal signal info.
SOURCE
Source Transmitter Channel Receiver User

Transmitter

Source Channel
Formatter Modulator
encoder encoder

Receiver

Source Channel
Formatter Demodulator
decoder decoder
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
8 : “shiv rpi”
Digital vs Analog Comm: Basics

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


9 : “shiv rpi”
Digital versus analog
‰ Advantages of digital communications:
‰ Regenerator receiver
Original Regenerated
pulse pulse

Propagation distance

‰ Different kinds of digital signal are treated


identically.
Voice
Data A bit is a bit!
Media
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
10 : “shiv rpi”
Signal transmission through linear systems

Input Output
Linear system
‰ Deterministic signals:
‰ Random signals:

‰ Ideal distortion less transmission:


All the frequency components of the signal not only arrive with
an identical time delay, but also are amplified or attenuated
equally.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


11 : “shiv rpi”
Signal transmission (cont’d)
‰ Ideal filters:

Non-causal!
Low-pass

Band-pass Duality => similar problems occur w/


High-pass
rectangular pulses in time domain.

‰ Realizable filters:
RC filters Butterworth filter

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


12 : “shiv rpi”
Bandwidth of signal
‰ Baseband versus bandpass:

Baseband Bandpass
signal signal
Local oscillator

‰ Bandwidth dilemma:
‰ Bandlimited signals are not realizable!
‰ Realizable signals have infinite bandwidth!
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
13 : “shiv rpi”
Bandwidth of signal: Approximations
‰ Different definition of bandwidth:
a) Half-power bandwidth d) Fractional power containment bandwidth
b) Noise equivalent bandwidth e) Bounded power spectral density
c) Null-to-null bandwidth f) Absolute bandwidth

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
(e)50dB
14 : “shiv rpi”
Formatting and transmission of baseband signal

Digital info.

Textual Format
source info.
Pulse
Analog Transmit
Sample Quantize Encode modulate
info.

Pulse
Bit stream waveforms Channel
Format
Analog
info. Low-pass
Decode Demodulate/
filter Receive
Textual Detect
sink
info.

Digital info.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


15 : “shiv rpi”
Sampling of Analog Signals
Time domain Frequency domain
xs (t ) = xδ (t ) × x(t ) X s ( f ) = Xδ ( f ) ∗ X ( f )
x(t )
| X(f )|

xδ (t ) | Xδ ( f ) |

xs (t )
| Xs( f )|

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


16 : “shiv rpi”
Aliasing effect & Nyquist Rate

LP filter

Nyquist rate

aliasing

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


17 : “shiv rpi”
Undersampling &Aliasing in
Time Domain

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


18 : “shiv rpi”
Nyquist Sampling & Reconstruction:
Time Domain

Note: correct reconstruction does not draw straight lines between samples.
Key: use sinc() pulses for reconstruction/interpolation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
19 : “shiv rpi”
Nyquist Reconstruction: Frequency Domain

The impulse response of the


reconstruction filter has a classic 'sin(x)/x
shape.

The stimulus fed to this filter is the series


of discrete impulses which are the
samples.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


20 : “shiv rpi”
Sampling theorem

Analog Sampling Pulse amplitude


signal process modulated (PAM) signal

‰ Sampling theorem: A bandlimited signal with no spectral


components beyond , can be uniquely determined by
values sampled at uniform intervals of

‰ The sampling rate,

is called Nyquist rate.

‰ In practice need to sample faster than this because the receiving


filter will not be sharp. Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

21 : “shiv rpi”
Quantization
‰ Amplitude quantizing: Mapping samples of a continuous amplitude
waveform to a finite set of amplitudes.

Out

In
ƒAverage quantization noise power
Quantized

ƒSignal peak power


values

ƒSignal power to average


quantization noise power

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


22 : “shiv rpi”
Encoding (PCM)

‰ A uniform linear quantizer is called Pulse Code Modulation


(PCM).
‰ Pulse code modulation (PCM): Encoding the quantized signals
into a digital word (PCM word or codeword).
‰ Each quantized sample is digitally encoded into an l bits
codeword where L in the number of quantization levels and

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


23 : “shiv rpi”
Quantization error
‰ Quantizing error: The difference between the input and output of a
quantizer
e(t ) = xˆ (t ) − x(t )

Process of quantizing noise


Qauntizer
Model of quantizing noise
y = q( x)
AGC x(t ) xˆ (t )
x(t ) xˆ (t )
x
e(t )

+
e(t ) =
xˆ (t ) − x(t )
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
24 : “shiv rpi”
Non-uniform quantization
‰ It is done by uniformly quantizing the “compressed” signal.
‰ At the receiver, an inverse compression characteristic, called “expansion” is
employed to avoid signal distortion.

compression+expansion companding

y = C ( x) x̂
x(t ) y (t ) yˆ (t ) xˆ (t )

x ŷ
Compress Qauntize Expand
Transmitter Channel Receiver
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
25 : “shiv rpi”
Baseband transmission
‰ To transmit information thru physical channels, PCM
sequences (codewords) are transformed to pulses (waveforms).
‰ Each waveform carries a symbol from a set of size M.
‰ Each transmit symbol represents k =log2 M bits of the PCM words.
‰ PCM waveforms (line codes) are used for binary symbols (M=2).

‰ M-ary pulse modulation are used for non-binary symbols


(M>2). Eg: M-ary PAM.
‰ For a given data rate, M-ary PAM (M>2) requires less bandwidth than
binary PCM.
‰ For a given average pulse power, binary PCM is easier to detect than M-
ary PAM (M>2).

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


26 : “shiv rpi”
PAM example: Binary vs 8-ary

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


27 : “shiv rpi”
Example of M-ary PAM
Assuming real time Tx and equal energy per Tx data bit for
binary-PAM and 4-ary PAM:
• 4-ary: T=2Tb and Binary: T=Tb

• Energy per symbol in binary-PAM: A = 10B


2 2

Binary PAM 4-ary PAM


(rectangular pulse) (rectangular pulse)

3B
A.
‘11’
‘1’ B
T
T T ‘01’
T ‘00’ T T
-B
‘0’ ‘10’
-A. -3B
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
28 : “shiv rpi”
Other PCM waveforms: Examples

‰ PCM waveforms category:


ƒ Nonreturn-to-zero (NRZ) ƒ Phase encoded
ƒ Return-to-zero (RZ) ƒ Multilevel binary

+V
1 0 1 1 0 +V
1 0 1 1 0
NRZ-L -V Manchester -V

Unipolar-RZ +V Miller +V
0 -V
+V +V
Bipolar-RZ 0 Dicode NRZ 0
-V -V
0 T 2T 3T 4T 5T 0 T 2T 3T 4T 5T

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


29 : “shiv rpi”
PCM waveforms: Selection Criteria
‰ Criteria for comparing and selecting PCM waveforms:
‰ Spectral characteristics (power spectral density and
bandwidth efficiency)
‰ Bit synchronization capability
‰ Error detection capability
‰ Interference and noise immunity
‰ Implementation cost and complexity

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


30 : “shiv rpi”
Summary: Baseband Formatting and transmission
Digital info. Bit stream Pulse waveforms
(Data bits) (baseband signals)
Textual Format
source info.
Pulse
Analog Sample Quantize Encode modulate
info.

Sampling at rate Encoding each q. value to


f s = 1 / Ts l = log 2 L bits
(sampling time=Ts) (Data bit duration Tb=Ts/l)

Quantizing each sampled Mapping every m = log 2 M data bits to a


value to one of the symbol out of M symbols and transmitting
L levels in quantizer. a baseband waveform with duration T

‰ Information (data- or bit-) rate: Rb = 1 / Tb [bits/sec]


‰ Symbol rate : R = 1 / T [symbols/sec]

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rb = mR Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


31 : “shiv rpi”
Receiver Structure & Matched Filter

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


32 : “shiv rpi”
Demodulation and detection
mi Pulse g i (t ) Bandpass si (t ) M-ary modulation
Format
modulate modulate i = 1, K, M
channel
transmitted symbol hc (t )
estimated symbol n(t )
Demod.
Format Detect
m̂i z (T ) & sample r (t )

‰ Major sources of errors:


‰ Thermal noise (AWGN)
‰ disturbs the signal in an additive fashion (Additive)
‰ has flat spectral density for all frequencies of interest (White)
‰ is modeled by Gaussian random process (Gaussian Noise)
‰ Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI)
‰ Due to the filtering effect of transmitter, channel and receiver, symbols
are “smeared”. Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

33 : “shiv rpi”
Impact of AWGN

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


34 : “shiv rpi”
Impact of AWGN & Channel Distortion

hc (t ) = δ (t ) − 0.5δ (t − 0.75T )

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


35 : “shiv rpi”
Receiver job
‰ Demodulation and sampling:
‰ Waveform recovery and preparing the received signal for
detection:
‰ Improving the signal power to the noise power (SNR)
using matched filter (project to signal space)
‰ Reducing ISI using equalizer (remove channel distortion)
‰ Sampling the recovered waveform

‰ Detection:
‰ Estimate the transmitted symbol based on the received sample

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


36 : “shiv rpi”
Receiver structure

Step 1 – waveform to sample transformation Step 2 – decision making

Demodulate & Sample Detect

z (T ) Threshold m̂i
r (t ) Frequency Receiving Equalizing
comparison
down-conversion filter filter

For bandpass signals Compensation for


channel induced ISI

Received waveform Baseband pulse


Baseband pulse Sample
(possibly distorted)
(test statistic)

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


37 : “shiv rpi”
Baseband vs Bandpass
‰ Bandpass model of detection process is equivalent to baseband
model because:
‰ The received bandpass waveform is first transformed to a
baseband waveform.

‰ Equivalence theorem:
‰ Performing bandpass linear signal processing followed by
heterodying the signal to the baseband, …
‰ … yields the same results as …
‰ … heterodying the bandpass signal to the baseband ,
followed by a baseband linear signal processing.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


38 : “shiv rpi”
Steps in designing the receiver

‰ Find optimum solution for receiver design with the


following goals:
1. Maximize SNR: matched filter
2. Minimize ISI: equalizer

‰ Steps in design:
‰ Model the received signal
‰ Find separate solutions for each of the goals.

‰ First, we focus on designing a receiver which maximizes the


SNR: matched filter

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


39 : “shiv rpi”
Receiver filter to maximize the SNR
‰ Model the received signal
si (t ) hc (t ) r (t ) r (t ) = si (t ) ∗h c (t ) + n(t )

n(t )
AWGN

‰ Simplify the model (ideal channel assumption):


‰ Received signal in AWGN

Ideal channels
hc (t ) = δ (t )
si (t ) r (t ) r (t ) = si (t ) + n(t )

n(t )
AWGN

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


40 : “shiv rpi”
‰ Problem:
Matched Filter Receiver
‰ Design the receiver filter h(t ) such that the SNR is
maximized at the sampling time when si (t ), i = 1,..., M
is transmitted.
‰ Solution:
‰ The optimum filter, is the Matched filter, given by

h ( t ) = hopt ( t ) = s i (T − t )
*

H ( f ) = H opt ( f ) = S i ( f ) exp( − j 2π fT )
*

which is the time-reversed and delayed version of the conjugate of the


transmitted signal
si (t ) h(t ) = hopt (t )

0 T t 0 T t
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
41 : “shiv rpi”
Correlator Receiver
‰ The matched filter output at the sampling time, can be realized
as the correlator output.
‰ Matched filtering, i.e. convolution with si*(T-τ) simplifies to
integration w/ si*(τ), i.e. correlation or inner product!

z (T ) = hopt (T ) ∗ r (T )
T
= ∫ r (τ )s i (τ ) d τ =< r ( t ), s ( t ) >
*

Recall: correlation operation is the projection of the received


signal onto the signal space!

Key idea: Reject the noise (N) outside this space as irrelevant:
=> maximize S/N Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

42 : “shiv rpi”
Irrelevance Theorem: Noise Outside Signal Space

‰ Noise PSD is flat (“white”) => total noise power


infinite across the spectrum.
‰ We care only about the noise projected in the finite
signal dimensions (eg: the bandwidth of interest).
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
43 : “shiv rpi”
Aside: Correlation Effect

‰ Correlation is a maximum when two signals are similar in shape, and are in phase (or
'unshifted' with respect to each other).
‰ Correlation is a measure of the similarity between two signals as a function of time shift
(“lag”, τ ) between them
‰ When the two signals are similar in shape and unshifted with respect to each other, their
product is all positive. This is like constructive interference,
‰ The breadth of the correlation function - where it has significant value - shows for how long
the signals remain similar.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
44 : “shiv rpi”
Aside: Autocorrelation

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


45 : “shiv rpi”
Aside: Cross-Correlation &Radar

‰ Figure: shows how the signal can be located within the noise.
‰ A copy of the known reference signal is correlated with the unknown signal.
‰ The correlation will be high when the reference is similar to the unknown signal.
‰ A large value for correlation shows the degree of confidence that the reference signal is
detected.
‰ The large value of the correlation indicates when the reference signal occurs.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
46 : “shiv rpi”
• A copy of a known reference signal is correlated with the unknown signal.
• The correlation will be high if the reference is similar to the unknown signal.
• The unknown signal is correlated with a number of known reference functions.
• A large value for correlation shows the degree of similarity to the reference.
• The largest value for correlation is the most likely match.

• Same principle in communications: reference signals corresponding to


symbols
• The ideal communications channel may have attenuated, phase shifted the
reference signal, and added noise

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


47 : “shiv
Source: Bores Signal rpi”
Processing
Matched Filter: back to cartoon…

‰ Consider the received signal as a vector r, and the transmitted signal vector as s
‰ Matched filter “projects” the r onto signal space spanned by s (“matches” it)

Filtered signal can now be safely sampled by the receiver at the correct sampling instants,
resulting in a correct interpretation of the binary message

Matched filter is the filter that maximizes the signal-to-noise ratio it can be
shown that it also minimizes the BER: it is a simple projection operation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
48 : “shiv rpi”
Example of matched filter (real signals)
y (t ) = si (t ) ∗h opt (t )
si (t ) h opt (t ) A2
A A
T T

T t T t 0 T 2T t

y (t ) = si (t ) ∗h opt (t )
si (t ) h opt (t ) A2
A A
T T

T/2 T t T/2 T t 0 T/2 T 3T/2 2T t


−A −A − A2
2
T T

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


49 : “shiv rpi”
Properties of the Matched Filter
1. The Fourier transform of a matched filter output with the matched signal as input
is, except for a time delay factor, proportional to the ESD of the input signal.

Z ( f ) =| S ( f ) |2 exp(− j 2πfT )
2. The output signal of a matched filter is proportional to a shifted version of the
autocorrelation function of the input signal to which the filter is matched.

z (t ) = Rs (t − T ) ⇒ z (T ) = Rs (0) = Es
3. The output SNR of a matched filter depends only on the ratio of the signal energy
to the PSD of the white noise at the filter input.

⎛S⎞ Es
max⎜ ⎟ =
⎝ N ⎠T N 0 / 2
4. Two matching conditions in the matched-filtering operation:
‰ spectral phase matching that gives the desired output peak at time T.
‰ spectral amplitude matching that gives optimum SNR to the peak value.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


50 : “shiv rpi”
Implementation of matched filter receiver
Bank of M matched filters

z1 (T )
s (T − t ) ⎡ z1 ⎤
*
1
Matched filter output:
r (t ) ⎢ M ⎥=z z Observation
⎢ ⎥ vector

⎢⎣zM ⎥⎦
sM (T − t )
*
zM (T )

zi = r (t ) ∗ s ∗i (T − t ) i = 1,..., M
z = ( z1 (T ), z 2 (T ),..., z M (T )) = ( z1 , z 2 ,..., z M )
Note: we are projecting along the basis directions of the signal space
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
51 : “shiv rpi”
Implementation of correlator receiver
Bank of M correlators
s ∗1 (t )
T z1 (T )
∫0
⎡ z1 ⎤ Correlators output:
r (t ) ⎢M⎥ =z
z Observation
⎢ ⎥

s M (t ) vector
T ⎢⎣zM ⎥⎦
∫0 z M (T )

z = ( z1 (T ), z 2 (T ),..., z M (T )) = ( z1 , z 2 ,..., z M )
T
zi = ∫ r (t )si (t )dt i = 1,..., M
0
Note: In previous slide we “filter” i.e. convolute inShivkumar
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
the boxesKalyanaraman
shown.
52 : “shiv rpi”
Implementation example of matched filter receivers

s1 (t )
A
Bank of 2 matched filters
T

0 T t A z1 (T )
T ⎡z1 ⎤
r (t )
0 T
⎢ ⎥ =z
z
s2 (t ) ⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣z2 ⎥⎦
0 T
z 2 (T )
0 T t
−A −A
T T

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


53 : “shiv rpi”
Matched Filter: Frequency domain View

Simple Bandpass Filter:


excludes noise, but misses some signal power

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


54 : “shiv rpi”
Matched Filter: Frequency Domain View (Contd)
Multi-Bandpass Filter: includes more signal power, but adds more noise also!

Matched Filter: includes more signal power, weighted according to size


=> maximal noise rejection!

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


55 : “shiv rpi”
Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) viewpoint
‰ Generalization of this f-domain picture, for combining
multi-tap signal

Weight each branch

SNR:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
56 : “shiv rpi”
Examples of matched filter output for bandpass
modulation schemes

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


57 : “shiv rpi”
Signal Space Concepts

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


58 : “shiv rpi”
Signal space: Overview
‰ What is a signal space?
‰ Vector representations of signals in an N-dimensional orthogonal space

‰ Why do we need a signal space?


‰ It is a means to convert signals to vectors and vice versa.
‰ It is a means to calculate signals energy and Euclidean distances
between signals.

‰ Why are we interested in Euclidean distances between signals?


‰ For detection purposes: The received signal is transformed to a received
vectors.
‰ The signal which has the minimum distance to the received signal is
estimated as the transmitted signal.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
59 : “shiv rpi”
Schematic example of a signal space
ψ 2 (t )
s1 = (a11 , a12 )

ψ 1 (t )
z = ( z1 , z 2 )

s 3 = (a31 , a32 )

s 2 = (a21 , a22 )
s1 (t ) = a11ψ 1 (t ) + a12ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ s1 = (a11 , a12 )
Transmitted signal
s2 (t ) = a21ψ 1 (t ) + a22ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ s 2 = (a21 , a22 )
alternatives
s3 (t ) = a31ψ 1 (t ) + a32ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ s 3 = (a31 , a32 )
Received signal at
z (t ) = z1ψ 1 (t ) + z2ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ z = ( z1 , z 2 )
matched
Rensselaerfilter output
Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
60 : “shiv rpi”
Signal space
‰ To form a signal space, first we need to know the
inner product between two signals (functions):
‰ Inner (scalar) product:

< x(t ), y (t ) >= ∫ x t y (t )dt
*
( )
−∞
= cross-correlation between x(t) and y(t)

‰ Properties of inner product:


< ax (t ), y (t ) >= a < x(t ), y (t ) >
< x(t ), ay (t ) >= a * < x(t ), y (t ) >
< x(t ) + y (t ), z (t ) >=< x(t ), z (t ) > + < y (t ), z (t ) >
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
61 : “shiv rpi”
Signal space …
‰ The distance in signal space is measure by calculating the norm.
‰ What is norm?
‰ Norm of a signal:

x(t ) = < x(t ), x(t ) > = ∫ x(t ) dt = E x
2
−∞
= “length” of x(t)
ax(t ) = a x(t )

‰ Norm between two signals:

d x , y = x(t ) − y (t )

‰ We refer to the norm between two signals as the Euclidean distance between
two signals.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
62 : “shiv rpi”
Example of distances in signal space
ψ 2 (t )
s1 = (a11 , a12 )

E1 d s1 , z
ψ 1 (t )
E3 z = ( z1 , z 2 )
d s3 , z E2 d s2 , z
s 3 = (a31 , a32 )

s 2 = (a21 , a22 )

The Euclidean distance between signals z(t) and s(t):


d si , z = si (t ) − z (t ) = (ai1 − z1 ) 2 + (ai 2 − z 2 ) 2
i = 1,2,3
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
63 : “shiv rpi”
Orthogonal signal space
‰ N-dimensional orthogonal signal space is characterized by N
linearly independent functions {ψ j (t )}j =1 called basis functions.
N

The basis functions must satisfy the orthogonality condition

T
0≤t ≤T
< ψ i (t ),ψ j (t ) >= ∫ψ i (t )ψ (t )dt = K iδ ji
*
j
0
j , i = 1,..., N
where
⎧1 → i = j
δ ij = ⎨
⎩0 → i ≠ j

‰ If all K i = 1 , the signal space is orthonormal.


‰
Constructing Orthonormal basis from non-orthonormal set of vectors:
‰ Gram-Schmidt procedure

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


64 : “shiv rpi”
Example of an orthonormal bases
‰ Example: 2-dimensional orthonormal signal space
⎧ 2
ψ
⎪ 1 (t ) = cos(2πt / T ) 0≤t <T ψ 2 (t )
⎪ T

⎪ψ (t ) = 2 sin( 2πt / T ) 0≤t <T
⎪⎩ 2 T
T
ψ 1 (t )
0
< ψ 1 (t ),ψ 2 (t ) >= ∫ψ 1 (t )ψ 2 (t )dt = 0
0

ψ 1 (t ) = ψ 2 (t ) = 1

‰ Example: 1-dimensional orthonornal signal space


ψ 1 (t )
1 ψ 1 (t ) = 1
T ψ 1 (t )
0
0 T t
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
65 : “shiv rpi”
Sine/Cosine Bases: Note!
‰ Approximately orthonormal!

‰ These are the in-phase & quadrature-phase dimensions of


complex baseband equivalent representations.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
66 : “shiv rpi”
Example: BPSK

‰ Note: two symbols, but only one dimension in BPSK.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


67 : “shiv rpi”
Signal space …
‰ Any arbitrary finite set of waveforms {si (t )}iM=1
where each member of the set is of duration T, can be expressed
as a linear combination of N orthogonal waveforms
where {ψ .(t )}N N≤M
j j =1

N
si (t ) = ∑ aijψ j (t ) i = 1,..., M
j =1 N≤M
where
T
1 1 j = 1,..., N
aij =
Kj
< si (t ),ψ j (t ) >= ∫
Kj 0
si (t )ψ *j (t )dt
i = 1,..., M
0≤t ≤T

N
Ei = ∑ K j aij
2
s i = (ai1 , ai 2 ,..., aiN )
j =1
Vector representation of waveform Waveform energy
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
68 : “shiv rpi”
Signal space …
N
s i (t ) = ∑ a ijψ j (t ) s i = (ai1 , ai 2 ,..., aiN )
j =1

Waveform to vector conversion Vector to waveform conversion

ψ 1 (t ) ψ 1 (t )
T ai1 ai1
∫ ⎡ai1 ⎤ ⎡ai1 ⎤
⎢M⎥
0 sm
si (t ) ⎢ M ⎥ = sm si (t )
ψ N (t ) ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ψ N (t )
T ⎢⎣aiN ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣aiN ⎥⎦
∫0 aiN aiN

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


69 : “shiv rpi”
Example of projecting signals to an
orthonormal signal space
ψ 2 (t )
s1 = (a11 , a12 )

ψ 1 (t )

s 3 = (a31 , a32 )

s 2 = (a21 , a22 )

s1 (t ) = a11ψ 1 (t ) + a12ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ s1 = (a11 , a12 )


Transmitted signal
alternatives s2 (t ) = a21ψ 1 (t ) + a22ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ s 2 = (a21 , a22 )
s3 (t ) = a31ψ 1 (t ) + a32ψ 2 (t ) ⇔ s 3 = (a31 , a32 )
T

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute aij = ∫ si (t )ψ j (t )dt j = 1,..., N 0 ≤ t ≤ TKalyanaraman


i = 1,..., M Shivkumar
0
70 : “shiv rpi”
Matched filter receiver (revisited)
(note: we match to the basis directions)
Bank of N matched filters

z1
ψ (T − t )

⎡ z1 ⎤
1 Observation
vector
r (t )
⎢ ⎥=z z
⎢ ⎥
ψ ∗ N (T − t ) ⎢⎣zN ⎥⎦
zN
N
si (t ) = ∑ aijψ j (t ) i = 1,..., M
j =1
z = ( z1 , z 2 ,..., z N ) N≤M
z j = r (t ) ∗ψ j (T − t ) j = 1,..., N
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
71 : “shiv rpi”
Correlator receiver (revisited)
Bank of N correlators

ψ 1 (t )
T z1
∫0
⎡ r1 ⎤
r (t ) ⎢M⎥ =z
z Observation
ψ N (t ) ⎢ ⎥ vector
T ⎢⎣rN ⎥⎦
∫0 zN
N
si (t ) = ∑ aijψ j (t ) i = 1,..., M
j =1
z = ( z1 , z 2 ,..., z N ) N≤M
T
z j = ∫ r (t )ψ j (t )dt j = 1,..., N
0 Institute
Rensselaer Polytechnic Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
72 : “shiv rpi”
Example of matched filter receivers using
basic functions
s1 (t ) s2 (t ) ψ 1 (t )
A 1
T T
0 T t
0 T t −A 0 T t
T

1 matched filter
ψ 1 (t )
r (t )
[z1] = z
1
T z1 z

0 T t

‰ Number of matched filters (or correlators) is reduced by 1 compared to


using matched filters (correlators) to the transmitted signal!
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
73 : “shiv rpi”
White noise in Orthonormal Signal Space
‰ AWGN n(t) can be expressed as
n(t ) = nˆ (t ) + n~ (t )
Noise outside on the signal space
Noise projected on the signal space
(irrelevant)
(colored):impacts the detection process.
N
nˆ (t ) = ∑ n jψ j (t ) nˆ (t )
Vector representation of
j =1
n j =< n(t ),ψ j (t ) > j = 1,..., N n = (n1 , n2 ,..., nN )

< n~ (t ),ψ (t ) >= 0


j
j = 1,..., N {n } N
independent zero-mean
j j =1
Gaussain random variables with
variance var(n j ) = N 0 / 2

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


74 : “shiv rpi”
Detection: Maximum Likelihood &
Performance Bounds

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


75 : “shiv rpi”
Detection of signal in AWGN
‰ Detection problem:
‰ Given the observation vector z , perform a mapping from z
to an estimate m̂ of the transmitted symbol, mi , such that
the average probability of error in the decision is
minimized.

n
mi si z m̂
Modulator Decision rule

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


76 : “shiv rpi”
Statistics of the observation Vector
‰ AWGN channel model: z = si + n
‰ Signal vector s i = (ai1 , ai 2 ,..., aiN ) is deterministic.
‰ Elements of noise vector n = ( n1 , n2 ,..., nN ) are i.i.d Gaussian
random variables with zero-mean and variance N 0 / 2 . The
noise vector pdf is
1 ⎛ n
2

pn (n) = exp⎜− ⎟
(πN 0 )N / 2 ⎜⎝ N 0 ⎟⎠
‰ The elements of observed vector z = ( z1 , z 2 ,..., z N ) are
independent Gaussian random variables. Its pdf is
1 ⎛ z − s
2

pz ( z | s i ) = exp⎜ − i ⎟
(πN 0 )N /2

⎝ N 0


Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
77 : “shiv rpi”
Detection
‰ Optimum decision rule (maximum a posteriori probability):

Set mˆ = mi if
Pr( mi sent | z ) ≥ Pr(mk sent | z ), for all k ≠ i
where k = 1,..., M .

‰ Applying Bayes’ rule gives:


Set mˆ = mi if
pz (z | mk )
pk , is maximum for all k = i
pz ( z )
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
78 : “shiv rpi”
Detection …
‰ Partition the signal space into M decision regions,
such that Z1 ,..., Z M

Vector z lies inside region Z i if


pz (z | mk )
ln[ pk ], is maximum for all k = i.
pz ( z )
That means
mˆ = mi

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


79 : “shiv rpi”
Detection (ML rule)
‰ For equal probable symbols, the optimum decision rule
(maximum posteriori probability) is simplified to:

Set mˆ = mi if
pz (z | mk ), is maximum for all k = i

or equivalently:

Set mˆ = mi if
ln[ pz (z | mk )], is maximum for all k = i

which is known as maximum likelihood.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


80 : “shiv rpi”
Detection (ML)…
‰ Partition the signal space into M decision regions, Z1 ,..., Z M
‰ Restate the maximum likelihood decision rule as follows:

Vector z lies inside region Z i if


ln[ pz (z | mk )], is maximum for all k = i
That means
mˆ = mi

Vector z lies inside region Z i if


z − s k , is minimum for all k = i

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


81 : “shiv rpi”
Schematic example of ML decision regions
ψ 2 (t )
Z2
s2

Z1
s3 s1
Z3 ψ 1 (t )

s4

Z4
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
82 : “shiv rpi”
Probability of symbol error
‰ Erroneous decision: For the transmitted symbol s i or equivalently signal
vector mi , an error in decision occurs if the observation vector z does not
fall inside region Z i.
‰ Probability of erroneous decision for a transmitted symbol

Pr(mˆ ≠ mi ) = Pr(mi sent)Pr(z does not lie inside Z i mi sent)

‰ Probability of correct decision for a transmitted symbol

Pr(mˆ = mi ) = Pr(mi sent)Pr(z lies inside Z i mi sent)

Pc (mi ) = Pr(z lies inside Z i mi sent) = ∫ p (z | m )dz


Zi
z i

Pe (mi ) = 1 − Pc (mi )
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
83 : “shiv rpi”
Example for binary PAM

pz (z | m2 ) pz (z | m1 )

s2 s1
ψ 1 (t )
− Eb 0 Eb

⎛ s1 − s 2 / 2 ⎞
Pe (m1 ) = Pe (m2 ) = Q⎜ ⎟
⎜ N /2 ⎟
⎝ 0 ⎠
⎛ 2 Eb ⎞
PB = PE (2) = Q⎜⎜ ⎟

⎝ N0 ⎠
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
84 : “shiv rpi”
Average prob. of symbol error …
‰ Average probability of symbol error :
M
PE ( M ) = ∑ Pr ( mˆ ≠ m )
i =1
i

‰ For equally probable symbols:

M M
1 1
PE ( M ) =
M

i =1
Pe (mi ) = 1 −
M
∑ P (m )
i =1
c i

M
1
= 1−
M
∑ ∫ p (z | m )dz
i =1 Z i
z i

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


85 : “shiv rpi”
Union bound

Union bound
The probability of a finite union of events is upper bounded
by the sum of the probabilities of the individual events.

M M M
1
Pe (mi ) ≤ ∑ P2 (s k , s i ) PE ( M ) ≤ ∑∑ P (s 2 k , si )
k =1 M i =1 k =1
k ≠i k ≠i

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


86 : “shiv rpi”
Example of union bound
ψ2
Z2 r Z1
Pe (m1 ) = ∫ p (r | m )dr
r
Z 2 ∪Z3 ∪Z 4
1 s2 s1

ψ1
Union bound: s3 s4
4 Z3 Z4
Pe (m1 ) ≤ ∑ P2 (s k , s1 )
k =2

ψ2 ψ2 ψ2
A2 r r r
s2 s1 s2 s1 s2 s1

ψ1 ψ1 ψ1
s3 s4 s3 s4 s3 s4
A3 A4
P2 (s 2 , s1 ) = ∫ p (r | m )dr
A
r 1 P2 (s 3 , s1 ) = ∫ p (r | m )dr
A3
r 1 P2 (s 4 , s1 ) = ∫ pr (r | m1 )dr
2 A4
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

87 : “shiv rpi”
Upper bound based on minimum distance
P2 (s k , s i ) = Pr(z is closer to s k than s i , when s i is sent)

1 u2 ⎛ d ik / 2 ⎞
= ∫ exp(− )du =Q⎜ ⎟
πN 0 N0 ⎜ N /2 ⎟
d ik ⎝ 0 ⎠
d ik = s i − s k

1 M M ⎛ d min / 2 ⎞
PE ( M ) ≤
M
∑∑ P2 (s k , s i ) ≤ ( M − 1)Q⎜
⎜ N /2 ⎟

i =1 k =1
k ≠i
⎝ 0 ⎠
d min = min d ik
Minimum distance in the signal space: i ,k
i≠k

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


88 : “shiv rpi”
Example of upper bound on av. Symbol error prob.
based on union bound
s i = Ei = Es , i = 1,...,4 ψ 2 (t )

d i ,k = 2 Es
i≠k Es s2
d min = 2 Es d 2,3 d1, 2
s3 s1
ψ 1 (t )
− Es Es
d 3, 4 d1, 4

s4
− Es

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


89 : “shiv rpi”
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
90 : “shiv rpi”
Eb/No figure of merit in digital
communications
‰ SNR or S/N is the average signal power to the average noise
power. SNR should be modified in terms of bit-energy in
digital communication, because:
‰ Signals are transmitted within a symbol duration and hence,
are energy signal (zero power).
‰ A metric at the bit-level facilitates comparison of different
DCS transmitting different number of bits per symbol.

Eb STb S W Rb : Bit rate


= =
N 0 N / W N Rb W : Bandwidth

Note: S/N = Eb/No x spectral efficiency


Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
91 : “shiv rpi”
Example of Symbol error prob. For PAM signals

Binary PAM
s2 s1
ψ 1 (t )
− Eb 0 Eb

4-ary PAM
s4 s3 s2 s1

Eb E 0 E Eb ψ 1 (t )
−6 −2 b 2 b 6
5 5 5 5

ψ1 (t )
1
T

0 T t
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
92 : “shiv rpi”
Maximum Likelihood (ML) Detection: Vector Case
Nearest Neighbor Rule:
By the isotropic property of the Gaussian noise, we expect the error
probability to be the same for both the transmit symbols uA, uB.

Error probability:

Project the received vector y along the


difference vector direction uA- uB is a
“sufficient statistic”.

Noise outside these finite dimensions is


irrelevant for detection. (rotational
invariance of detection problem)
ps: Vector norm is a natural extension of “magnitude” or length
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
93 : “shiv rpi”
Extension to M-PAM (Multi-Level Modulation)

‰ Note: h refers to the constellation shape/direction

MPAM:

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


94 : “shiv rpi”
Complex Vector Space Detection

Error probability:

‰ Note: Instead of vT, use v* for complex vectors (“transpose and conjugate”)
for inner products…
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
95 : “shiv rpi”
Complex
Detection:
Summary

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


96 : “shiv rpi”
Detection Error => BER

‰ If the bit error is i.i.d (discrete memoryless channel) over the sequence of bits,
then you can model it as a binary symmetric channel (BSC)
‰ BER is modeled as a uniform probability f
‰ As BER (f) increases, the effects become increasingly intolerable
‰ f tends to increase rapidly with lower SNR: “waterfall” curve (Q-function)

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


97 : “shiv rpi”
SNR vs BER: AWGN vs Rayleigh
Need
diversity
techniques
to deal with
Rayleigh
(even 1-tap,
flat-fading)!

‰ Observe the “waterfall” like characteristic (essentially plotting the Q(x) function)!
‰ Telephone lines: SNR = 37dB, but low b/w (3.7kHz)
‰ Wireless: Low SNR = 5-10dB, higher bandwidth (upto 10 Mhz, MAN, and 20Mhz LAN)
‰ Optical fiber comm: High SNR, high bandwidth ! But cant process w/ complicated codes,
signal processing etc
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
98 : “shiv rpi”
Better performance through diversity

Diversity Ù the receiver is provided with multiple copies


of the transmitted signal. The multiple signal copies
should experience uncorrelated fading in the channel.
In this case the probability that all signal copies fade
simultaneously is reduced dramatically with respect to
the probability that a single copy experiences a fade.
As a rough rule:

1 Diversity
Diversity of
Pe is proportional to of
γ 0L L:th
L:th order
order

BER
BER Average
Average SNR
SNR

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


99 : “shiv rpi”
BER vs. SNR (diversity effect)

BER
( = Pe )

Flat fading channel,


Rayleigh fading,
AWGN L=1
channel
(no fading)

SNR (= γ0)
L=4 L=3 L=2

We will explore this story later… slide set part II


Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
100 : “shiv rpi”
Modulation Techniques

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


101 : “shiv rpi”
What is Modulation?
‰ Encoding information in a manner suitable for
transmission.
‰ Translate baseband source signal to bandpass signal
‰ Bandpass signal: “modulated signal”

‰ How?
‰ Vary amplitude, phase or frequency of a carrier

‰ Demodulation: extract baseband message from carrier

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


102 : “shiv rpi”
Digital vs Analog Modulation
‰ Cheaper, faster, more power efficient
‰ Higher data rates, power error correction, impairment
resistance:
‰ Using coding, modulation, diversity
‰ Equalization, multicarrier techniques for ISI
mitigation
‰ More efficient multiple access strategies, better
security: CDMA, encryption etc

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


103 : “shiv rpi”
Goals of Modulation Techniques

• High Bit Rate

• High Spectral Efficiency (max Bps/Hz)

• High Power Efficiency (min power to achieve a target BER)

• Low-Cost/Low-Power Implementation

• Robustness to Impairments

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


104 : “shiv rpi”
Modulation: representation
• Any modulated signal can be represented as
s(t) = A(t) cos [ωct + φ(t)]

amplitude phase or frequency

s(t) = A(t) cos φ(t) cos ωct - A(t) sin φ(t) sin ωct

in-phase quadrature

• Linear versus nonlinear modulation ⇒ impact on spectral efficiency


Linear: Amplitude or phase
Non-linear: frequency: spectral broadening
• Constant envelope versus non-constant envelope
⇒ hardware implications with impact on power efficiency
(=> reliability: i.e. target BER at lower SNRs)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
105 : “shiv rpi”
Complex Vector Spaces: Constellations

MPSK

Circular Square
‰ Each signal is encoded (modulated) as a vector in a signal space

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


106 : “shiv rpi”
Linear Modulation Techniques
s(t) = [ Σ an g (t-nT)]cos ωct - [ Σ bn g (t-nT)] sin ωct
n n
I(t), in-phase Q(t), quadrature

LINEAR MODULATIONS

Square M-ARY QUADRATURE M-ARY PHASE Circular


Constellations AMPLITUDE MOD. SHIFT KEYING Constellations
(M-QAM) (M-PSK)

M≠4 M=4 M≠4


(4-QAM = 4-PSK)

CONVENTIONAL OFFSET DIFFERENTIAL


4-PSK 4-PSK 4-PSK
(QPSK) (OQPSK) (DQPSK, π/4-DQPSK)

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


107 : “shiv rpi”
M-PSK and M-QAM

M-PSK (Circular Constellations) M-QAM (Square Constellations)


bn bn
4-PSK
16-QAM
16-PSK
4-PSK

an an

Tradeoffs
– Higher-order modulations (M large) are more spectrally
efficient but less power efficient (i.e. BER higher).
– M-QAM is more spectrally efficient than M-PSK but
also more sensitive to system nonlinearities.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


108 : “shiv rpi”
Bandwidth vs. Power Efficiency

MPSK:

MQAM:

MFSK:

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


Source: Rappaport book, chap 6 : “shiv rpi”
109
MPAM & Symbol Mapping
Binary PAM
‰ Note: the average energy s2 s1
ψ 1 (t )
per-bit is constant − Eb 0 Eb

‰ Gray coding used for


4-ary PAM
mapping bits to symbols s4 s3 s2 s1

‰ Why? Most likely error is to Eb Eb 0 Eb Eb ψ 1 (t )


−6 −2 2 6
confuse with neighboring 5 5 5 5

symbol.
‰ Make sure that the
Gray coding
00 01 11 10
neighboring symbol has only 4-ary PAM
s4 s3 s2 s1
1-bit difference (hamming
distance = 1) Eb E 0 E Eb ψ 1 (t )
−6 −2 b 2 b 6
5 5 5 5

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


110 : “shiv rpi”
MPAM: Details

Unequal energies/symbol:

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


Decision111
Regions : “shiv rpi”
M-PSK (Circular Constellations)
MPSK: bn
4-PSK
16-PSK

an

‰ Constellation points:

‰ Equal energy in all signals:


01
01 00
‰ Gray coding 00
11

10
11 Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 10
112 : “shiv rpi”
MPSK: Decision Regions & Demod’ln
Z3
Z2 Z4
Z2

Z3 Z1 Z5 Z1

Z6 Z8
Z4 Z7
4PSK 8PSK
4PSK: 1 bit/complex dimension or 2 bits/symbol
m=1

si(t) + n(t) Z1: r > 0 m = 0 or 1


X g(Tb - t)
Z2: r ≤ 0
m=0
cos(2πfct)
Coherent Demodulator for BPSK.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
113 : “shiv rpi”
M-QAM (Square Constellations)
MQAM: bn
16-QAM

4-PSK
an

‰ Unequal symbol energies:


Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4
‰ MQAM with square constellations of size is L2
equivalent to MPAM modulation with
constellations of size L on each of the in-phase Z5 Z6 Z7 Z8
and quadrature signal components

‰ For square constellations it takes approximately Z9 Z10 Z11 Z12


6 dB more power to send an additional 1
bit/dimension or 2 bits/symbol while
maintaining the same minimum distance Z13 Z14 Z15 Z16
between constellation points

‰ Hard to find a Gray code mapping where all


adjacent symbols differ by a single bit 16QAM: Decision Regions
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
114 : “shiv rpi”
Non-Coherent Modulation: DPSK
‰ Information in MPSK, MQAM carried in signal phase.
‰ Requires coherent demodulation: i.e. phase of the transmitted signal carrier φ0 must
be matched to the phase of the receiver carrier φ
‰ More cost, susceptible to carrier phase drift.
‰ Harder to obtain in fading channels

‰ Differential modulation: do not require phase reference.


‰ More general: modulation w/ memory: depends upon prior symbols transmitted.
‰ Use prev symbol as the a phase reference for current symbol
‰ Info bits encoded as the differential phase between current & previous symbol
‰ Less sensitive to carrier phase drift (f-domain) ; more sensitive to doppler
effects: decorrelation of signal phase in time-domain

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


115 : “shiv rpi”
Differential Modulation (Contd)
‰ DPSK: Differential BPSK
‰ A 0 bit is encoded by no change in phase, whereas a 1 bit is encoded as a
phase change of π.
‰ If symbol over time [(k−1)Ts, kTs) has phase θ(k − 1) = ejθi , θi = 0, π,
‰ then to encode a 0 bit over [kTs, (k + 1)Ts), the symbol would have
‰ phase: θ(k) = ejθi and…
‰ … to encode a 1 bit the symbol would have
‰ phase θ(k) = ej(θi+π).

‰ DQPSK: gray coding:

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


116 : “shiv rpi”
Quadrature Offset
‰ Phase transitions of 180o can cause large amplitude transitions (through
zero point).
‰ Abrupt phase transitions and large amplitude variations can be distorted
by nonlinear amplifiers and filters

‰ Avoided by offsetting the quadrature branch pulse g(t) by half a symbol


period
‰ Usually abbreviated as O-MPSK, where the O indicates the offset
‰ QPSK modulation with quadrature offset is referred to as O-QPSK
‰ O-QPSK has the same spectral properties as QPSK for linear
amplification,..
‰ … but has higher spectral efficiency under nonlinear amplification,
‰ since the maximum phase transition of the signal is 90 degrees

‰ Another technique to mitigate the amplitude fluctuations of a 180 degree


phase shift used in the IS-54 standard for digital cellular is π/4-QPSK
‰ Maximum phase transition of 135 degrees, versus 90 degrees for offset
QPSK and 180 degrees for QPSK
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
117 : “shiv rpi”
Offset QPSK waveforms

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


118 : “shiv rpi”
Frequency Shift Keying (FSK)
• Continuous Phase FSK (CPFSK)
– digital data encoded in the frequency shift
– typically implemented with frequency
modulator to maintain continuous phase
s(t) = A cos [ωct + 2 πkf ∫ d(τ) dτ]
t
−∞

– nonlinear modulation but constant-envelope


• Minimum Shift Keying (MSK)
– minimum bandwidth, sidelobes large
– can be implemented using I-Q receiver

• Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying (GMSK)


– reduces sidelobes of MSK using a premodulation filter
– used by RAM Mobile Data, CDPD, and HIPERLAN

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


119 : “shiv rpi”
Minimum Shift Keying (MSK) spectra

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


120 : “shiv rpi”
Spectral Characteristics
10
0 QPSK/DQPSK
GMSK
Power Spectral Density (dB)
-20

-40

-60
B3-dBTb = 0.16
0.25
-80
1.0

-100 (MSK)

-120
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Normalized Frequency (f-fc)Tb
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
121 : “shiv rpi”
10-1
Bit Error Probability (BER): AWGN
5

2
10-2
5 -3
For Pb = 10
2 DBPSK BPSK 6.5 dB
10-3 BPSK, QPSK QPSK 6.5 dB
5 DBPSK ~8 dB
Pb DQPSK ~9 dB
2
DQPSK
10-4
5 • QPSK is more spectrally efficient than BPSK
with the same performance.
2
10-5
• M-PSK, for M>4, is more spectrally efficient
but requires more SNR per bit.
5

2
• There is ~3 dB power penalty for differential
detection.
10-6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
γb, SNR/bit, dB

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


122 : “shiv rpi”
Bit Error Probability (BER): Fading Channel
1
5

2
10-1
5

2
10-2
5 DBPSK
Pb • Pb is inversely proportion to the average SNR per bit.
2
BPSK
10-3 • Transmission in a fading environment requires about
5 AWGN 18 dB more power for Pb = 10-3.

2
10-4
5

2
10-5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
γb, SNR/bit, dB
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
123 : “shiv rpi”
Bit Error Probability (BER): Doppler Effects
• Doppler causes an irreducible error floor when differential
detection is used ⇒ decorrelation of reference signal.

100
QPSK
DQPSK
10 -1
Rayleigh Fading
• The irreducible Pb depends on the data rate and the Doppler.
10 -2 For fD = 80 Hz,
data rate T Pbfloor

Pb 10
-3
10 kbps 10-4s 3x10-4
fDT=0.003
100 kbps 10-5s 3x10-6
No Fading 1 Mbps 10-6s 3x10-8
10 -4 0.002
The implication is that Doppler is not an issue for high-speed
0.001 wireless data.
10 -5 [M. D. Yacoub, Foundations of Mobile Radio Engineering ,
0 CRC Press, 1993]
10 -6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
γb, SNR/bit, dB

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


124 : “shiv rpi”
Bit Error Probability (BER): Delay Spread
• ISI causes an irreducible error floor.
10-1
Coherent Detection
+ BPSK
QPSK
OQPSK Modulation
x MSK
• The rms delay spread imposes a limit on the
x
10-2 maximum bit rate in a multipath environment.
Irreducible Pb

x
For example, for QPSK,
x τ Maximum Bit Rate
+
Mobile (rural) 25 μsec 8 kbps
x
+ Mobile (city) 2.5 μsec 80 kbps
Microcells 500 nsec 400 kbps
+ Large Building 100 nsec 2 Mbps
10-3
+ [J. C.-I. Chuang, "The Effects of Time Delay Spread on Portable Radio
x Communications Channels with Digital Modulation,"
IEEE JSAC, June 1987]

10-4
10-2 10-1 100
rms delay spread τ
=
symbol period T
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
125 : “shiv rpi”
Summary of Modulation Issues
• Tradeoffs

– linear versus nonlinear modulation


– constant envelope versus non-constant
envelope
– coherent versus differential detection
– power efficiency versus spectral efficiency

• Limitations

– flat fading
– doppler
– delay spread
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
126 : “shiv rpi”
Pulse Shaping

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


127 : “shiv rpi”
Recall: Impact of AWGN only

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


128 : “shiv rpi”
Impact of AWGN & Channel Distortion

hc (t ) = δ (t ) − 0.5δ (t − 0.75T )

Multi-tap, ISI channel

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


129 : “shiv rpi”
ISI Effects: Band-limited Filtering of Channel
‰ ISI due to filtering effect of the communications
channel (e.g. wireless channels)
‰ Channels behave like band-limited filters

jθ c ( f )
Hc ( f ) = Hc ( f ) e

Non-constant amplitude Non-linear phase

Amplitude distortion Phase distortion

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


130 : “shiv rpi”
Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI)
‰ ISI in the detection process due to the filtering effects
of the system
‰ Overall equivalent system transfer function

H ( f ) = Ht ( f )H c ( f )H r ( f )
‰ createsechoes and hence time dispersion
‰ causes ISI at sampling time

ISI effect

z k = sk + nk + ∑ α i si
i≠k

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


131 : “shiv rpi”
Inter-symbol interference (ISI): Model
‰ Baseband system model
x1 x2
zk
{xk } Tx filter Channel r (t ) Rx. filter {x̂k }
ht (t ) hc (t ) hr (t ) Detector
t = kT
T Ht ( f ) Hc ( f ) Hr ( f )
x3 T n(t )

‰ Equivalent model
x1 x2
zk
{xk } Equivalent system z (t ) {x̂k }
h(t ) Detector
t = kT
T H( f )
x3 T nˆ (t )
filtered noise
H ( f ) = Ht ( f )H c ( f )H r ( f )
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
132 : “shiv rpi”
Nyquist bandwidth constraint
‰ Nyquist bandwidth constraint (on equivalent system):
‰ The theoretical minimum required system bandwidth to
detect Rs [symbols/s] without ISI is Rs/2 [Hz].
‰ Equivalently, a system with bandwidth W=1/2T=Rs/2 [Hz]
can support a maximum transmission rate of 2W=1/T=Rs
[symbols/s] without ISI.

1 Rs Rs
= ≤W ⇒ ≥ 2 [symbol/s/Hz]
2T 2 W
‰ Bandwidth efficiency, R/W [bits/s/Hz] :
‰ An important measure in DCs representing data
throughput per hertz of bandwidth.
‰ Showing how efficiently the bandwidth resources are used
by signaling techniques. Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

133 : “shiv rpi”


Equiv System: Ideal Nyquist pulse (filter)
Ideal Nyquist filter Ideal Nyquist pulse
H( f ) h(t ) = sinc(t / T )
T 1

0 f − 2T − T 0 T 2T t
−1 1
2T 2T
1
W=
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 2T Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
134 : “shiv rpi”
Nyquist pulses (filters)
‰ Nyquist pulses (filters):
‰ Pulses (filters) which result in no ISI at the sampling time.
‰ Nyquist filter:
‰ Its transfer function in frequency domain is obtained by
convolving a rectangular function with any real even-
symmetric frequency function
‰ Nyquist pulse:
‰ Its shape can be represented by a sinc(t/T) function multiply
by another time function.
‰ Example of Nyquist filters: Raised-Cosine filter

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


135 : “shiv rpi”
Pulse shaping to reduce ISI
‰ Goals and trade-off in pulse-shaping
‰ Reduce ISI
‰ Efficient bandwidth utilization
‰ Robustness to timing error (small side lobes)

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


136 : “shiv rpi”
Raised Cosine Filter: Nyquist Pulse Approximation
| H ( f ) |=| H RC ( f ) | h(t ) = hRC (t )
1 r =0 1

r = 0. 5
0.5 0.5 r =1
r =1 r = 0.5
r =0

−1 − 3 −1 0 1 3 1 − 3T − 2T − T 0 T 2T 3T
T 4T 2T 2T 4T T

Rs
Baseband W sSB= (1 + r ) Passband W DSB= (1 + r ) Rs
2

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


137 : “shiv rpi”
Raised Cosine Filter
‰ Raised-Cosine Filter
‰ A Nyquist pulse (No ISI at the sampling time)

⎧1 for | f |< 2W0 − W


⎪⎪
2 ⎡ π | f | +W − 2W0 ⎤
H ( f ) = ⎨cos ⎢ ⎥ for 2W0 − W <| f |< W
⎪ ⎣4 W − W0 ⎦
⎪⎩0 for | f |> W
cos[2π (W − W0 )t ]
h(t ) = 2W0 (sinc(2W0t ))
1 − [4(W − W0 )t ]2
W − W0
Excess bandwidth: W − W Roll-off factor r =
W0
0 ≤ r ≤1
0

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


138 : “shiv rpi”
Pulse Shaping and Equalization Principles
No ISI at the sampling time

H RC ( f ) = H t ( f ) H c ( f ) H r ( f ) H e ( f )
‰ Square-Root Raised Cosine (SRRC) filter and Equalizer

H RC ( f ) = H t ( f ) H r ( f )
Taking care of ISI
H r ( f ) = H t ( f ) = H RC ( f ) = H SRRC ( f ) caused by tr. filter

1
He ( f ) = Taking care of ISI
Hc ( f ) caused by channel

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


139 : “shiv rpi”
Pulse Shaping & Orthogonal Bases

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


140 : “shiv rpi”
Virtue of pulse shaping

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


PSD of a BPSK signal Shivkumar Kalyanaraman
Source: Rappaport book, chap 6 : “shiv rpi”
141
Example of pulse shaping
‰ Square-root Raised-Cosine (SRRC) pulse shaping
Amp. [V]

Baseband tr. Waveform

Third pulse

t/T
First pulse
Second pulse

Data symbol

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


142 : “shiv rpi”
Example of pulse shaping …
‰ Raised Cosine pulse at the output of matched filter
Amp. [V]

Baseband received waveform at


the matched filter output
(zero ISI)

t/T

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


143 : “shiv rpi”
Eye pattern
‰ Eye pattern:Display on an oscilloscope which sweeps the system
response to a baseband signal at the rate 1/T (T symbol duration)

Distortion
due to ISI
Noise margin
amplitude scale

Sensitivity to
timing error

Timing jitter
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
timeShivkumar
scale Kalyanaraman
144 : “shiv rpi”
Example of eye pattern:
Binary-PAM, SRRC pulse
‰ Perfect channel (no noise and no ISI)

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


145 : “shiv rpi”
Example of eye pattern:
Binary-PAM, SRRC pulse …
‰ AWGN (Eb/N0=20 dB) and no ISI

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


146 : “shiv rpi”
Example of eye pattern:
Binary-PAM, SRRC pulse …
‰ AWGN (Eb/N0=10 dB) and no ISI

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


147 : “shiv rpi”
Summary
‰ Digital Basics
‰ Modulation & Detection, Performance, Bounds
‰ Modulation Schemes, Constellations
‰ Pulse Shaping

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


148 : “shiv rpi”
Extra Slides

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


149 : “shiv rpi”
Bandpass Modulation: I, Q Representation

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


150 : “shiv rpi”
Analog: Frequency Modulation (FM) vs
Amplitude Modulation (AM)
‰ FM: all information in the phase or frequency of carrier
‰ Non-linear or rapid improvement in reception quality beyond a minimum
received signal threshold: “capture” effect.
‰ Better noise immunity & resistance to fading
‰ Tradeoff bandwidth (modulation index) for improved SNR: 6dB gain for 2x
bandwidth
‰ Constant envelope signal: efficient (70%) class C power amps ok.

‰ AM: linear dependence on quality & power of rcvd signal


‰ Spectrally efficient but susceptible to noise & fading
‰ Fading improvement using in-band pilot tones & adapt receiver gain to
compensate
‰ Non-constant envelope: Power inefficient (30-40%) Class A or AB power amps
needed: ½ the talk time as FM!

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


151 : “shiv rpi”
Example Analog: Amplitude Modulation

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Shivkumar Kalyanaraman


152 : “shiv rpi”

You might also like