Digitally signed

by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2010.11.06
21:45:40 +02'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-11-06 Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923): California Attorneys Subjected to Extortion by

‘Corrupt Courts’ – a Legal Ethics Question
Los Angeles, November 6 – Human Rights Alert and Joseph Zernik, PhD, forwarded to legal experts a
California Legal Ethics questions, pertaining to duties and responsibilities of California attorneys facing
extortion by ‘corrupt courts’. The matter arose from litigation of Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923) –
Petition for marriage dissolution at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, where Receiver
was appointed under conditions deemed as extortion by the Court, and Counsel for Respondent, although
fully informed of the extortionist nature of the Receiver, stated that he would “tread lightly” in the matter,
since he was intimidated by the treatment accorded to former US prosecutor Richard Fine, who stood up to
corruption of the Los Angeles Court, and was imprisoned in solitary confinement for 18 months, with no
warrant and no judgment/conviction or sentencing ever entered in his case.
A recent United Nations Human Rights Council report referred to “corruption of the courts and the legal
profession” in California. [a] However, regardless of voluminous evidence of operation of an enterprise by the
LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket), the US Justice Department refuses to take action.
The two common features of the LA-JR noted in previous complaints to the US Department of Justice
included large-scale false imprisonments and financial fraud, including, but not limited to the installment of
pretense receiverships, involving Attorney David Pasternak (former President of the Los Angeles County Bar
Association, former Member of the California Judicial Council, and former President of Bet Tzedek), and
others, falsely acting as Receivers with no valid and effectual Appointment Order ever entered.
Regarding David Pasternak’s conduct, fraud expert – an FBI veteran, who was decorated by US Congress, by
US Attorney General, and by FBI Director - opined “fraud being committed” (linked below). Numerous
judges and commissioners were named as involved in the alleged racketeering, including, but not limited to
JACQUELINE CONNOR, ALAN GOODMAN, GREGORY O’BREIN, JOHN SEGAL, TERRY
FRIEDMAN, PATRICIA COLLINS, LISA HART-COLE, GERALD ROSENBERG, JAMES D
ENDMAN, CHARLES MCCOY, J STEPHEN CZULEGER, AND DAVID YAFFE, (see links to
complaints filed with the US Attorney Office below). Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE is opined as
central figure in the LA-JR. [b]
In a previous communication with a California Attorney, who was apparently involved in pretense litigations
at the court, the explanation offered by the Attorney for his conduct was in the need to provide for his wife
and children. [c] However, in Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923), Attorney Christopher G. Weston explicitly
stated that his decision to “tread lightly on this issue” was guided by “considering what happened to Richard
Fine” (copied below).
The names of the judges involved, as well as David Pasternak’s name were concealed from the “Case
Summary” of Hanassab v Hanassab - published by the Court online and deemed as false and deliberately
misleading records, [d] while the Court denies access to the Registers of Actions – the California civil
z Page 2/4 November 6, 2010

dockets. However, based on the departments listed, the Judges involved included AMY M PELLMAN
(CE65), MARJORIE S STEINBERG (CE2), THOMAS T LEWIS (CE79).
Request was forwarded to Attorney Weston for copies of key records in the case, for filing a complaint with
US Department of Justice regarding racketeering by Attorney David Pasternak and judges of the Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles involved in the case.
Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human
Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles,
California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management
systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system.
LINKS:
[a] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for
the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[b] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/
[c] 10-11-03 California Legal Ethics Question: What Are the Duties and Responsibilities of an Attorney
When Appearing in Pretense Court Proceedings Before a Corrupt Judge?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40844606/
[d] 10-11-06 Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923) – online Case Summary

CORRESPONDENCE pertaining to Hanassab v Hanassab (BD478923)

1) Note by Nasrin Hanassab, Nov 3, 2010

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:33:04
From: nasrin hanassab
Subject: Re David Pasternak
To: jz12345@earthlink.net

Hello,

My name is Nasrin Hanassab case number BD478923, I would like to speak with as I am currently facing a
difficult court battle and the receivership is under David Pasternak. I ask that if you would kindly contact me as I
have few questions regarding your complaint and I wish to know if there is anything that I can do to help myself
in this matter.

I did try to reach you at the phone number that is publicized on the web however, it appears not to be in service.
I ask you to please contact me.

My phone number is [redacted].

Attentively,
Nasrin Hanassab

2) Note by Joseph Zernik, Nov 4, 2010

Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:31:11
To: nasrin hanassab
From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Re David Pasternak

Thanks for contacting me.

I have reviewed numerous cases involving Mr Pasternak, and in my opinion he is a central figure in organized
z Page 3/4 November 6, 2010

crime at the court. [1] [2] [3] My opinion in that regard is supported by opinion letter of Mr James Wedick, a fraud
expert and FBI veteran, who was decorated by US Congress, US Attorney General, and FBI Director. [4]
I will review the Case Summary and other records that are provided online in the caption that you provided.
I do not need to speak with you by phone at this point. However, I need some basic records:
1) The Order Appointing David Pasternak Receiver, together with its Proof of Service.
2) The minutes issued by the court on the same day that the Order was signed by a judge, as served on you or
your attorney (alternatively - state that no Minutes were ever stated).
Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
LINKS
[1] http://www.scribd.com/doc/33354641/
10-06-21-Dr-Zernik-s-Complaint-Filed-with-Us-Attorney-Office-Los-Angeles-against-Mr-David-Pasternak-for-
Public-Corruption-Deprivation-of-Civil-Rights
[2] http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/
10-07-19-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-against-Judge-John-Segal-Clerk-John-Clarke-Attorney-
David-Pasternak-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-i
[3] http://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/
10-08-13-RE-Karimi-v-Mithawaila-BD518503-Complaint-against-Attorney-David-Pasternak-and-the-Superior-
Court-of-California-County-of-Los-Angeles
[4] 07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly
Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/

3) Note by Attorney Weston, Nov 4, 2010

From: WLCONNECTION@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:15:20 EDT
Subject: re: DAVID PASTERNAK
To: jz12345@earthlink.net

Dear Mr. Zernik:

I am the attorney for Ms. Hanassab who contacted you yesterday regarding the receiver David Pasternak. I am
interested in your case and investigation based on some unusual circumstances in Ms. Hanassab case. First in
that the parties stipulated to vacate the receiver and a few days later, David Pasternak went to court with nunc
pro tunc order without giving any notice to the parties and the judge in the case signed it. At my client's request
I will be sending you a writ of supercedes. However, this document and its exhibits are too large to email.

I would be interested in your opinion but I intend to tread lightly on this issue considering what happened to
Richard Fine.

Sincerely,

Christopher G. Weston
4) Note by Joseph Zernik, Nov 5, 2010

Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:39:13

To: WLCONNECTION@aol.com,
From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: re: DAVID PASTERNAK
Cc: nasrin hanassab

Dear Mr Weston:
z Page 4/4 November 6, 2010

I would be most interested in seeing copies of the following records, which I believe are relatively short:

1) Order signed by the judge in response to the nunc pro, as served on you by Mr Pasternak, together with the
Proof of Service, and
2) Minutes issued by the Court on the day that the judge signed the Order, as served on you by the Clerk of the
Court, together with Certificate of Mailing and Notice of Entry.

In case either or both were not served, it would be sufficient to state so.

Thanks,

Joseph Zernik
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…

Case Summary

Case Number: BD478923

JACK HANASSAB VS NASRIN HANASSAB

Filing Date: 01/16/2008

Case Type: Dissolution of Marriage (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending

Future Hearings

11/23/2010 at 08:30 AM in department CE79 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012
OSC-Order to Show Cause

02/10/2011 at 08:30 AM in department CE79 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012
OSC-Court's

Documents Filed | Proceeding Information

Parties

HANASSAB JACK - FORMER Petitioner in Pro Per

HANASSAB JACK - Petitioner in Pro Per

HANASSAB NASRIN - FORMER Respondent in Pro Per

HANASSAB NASRIN - Respondent

LANDAU STEPHEN RICHARD - FORMER Attorney for Petitioner

MCCREARY NEDA S - FORMER Attorney for Petitioner

MOSKALENSKY ORIT - Attorney for Respondent

NEHORAY SIAMAK E - FORMER Attorney for Petitioner

REGHABI ROSS K. - FORMER Attorney for Respondent

SANDLER BRADLEY STEPHEN - FORMER Attorney for Respondent

SHELIAN MEHRSHAD - Claimant

WESTON CHRISTOPHER G - Attorney for Respondent

Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date
indicated:
05/05/2010 12/10/2009 05/28/2009 09/09/2008

10/19/2010 Opposition

lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 1/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…
10/04/2010 Notice-Atty in re-Ntc of Appeal

10/01/2010 Notice-Appeal

09/30/2010 Proof of Service

09/28/2010 Miscellaneous

09/27/2010 Declaration

09/24/2010 Declaration

09/24/2010 Proof of Service

09/22/2010 OSC-Declaration for Contempt

Filed by Respondent

09/22/2010 Application-Ex Parte

09/22/2010 Notice-Change of Address

09/21/2010 Motion

09/21/2010 Order-Show Cause

09/21/2010 Motion-Vacate
Filed by Respondent

09/08/2010 Notice

09/07/2010 Motion-Consolidate
Filed by Respondent

09/07/2010 Notice

08/06/2010 Notice

08/04/2010 Notice

08/02/2010 Declaration

08/02/2010 Miscellaneous

07/29/2010 Order

07/22/2010 Proof of Service-Mail

07/09/2010 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

07/09/2010 Notice

07/08/2010 Proof of Service-Mail

07/02/2010 Substitution of Attorney

06/29/2010 Notice-Unavailablity-Counsel

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 05/05/2010 12/10/2009 05/28/2009 09/09/2008

05/05/2010 Answer

lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 2/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…
Filed by Claimant

05/04/2010 Stipulation-Continuance

04/30/2010 Substitution of Attorney

04/16/2010 Miscellaneous

04/16/2010 Oath of Receiver

04/15/2010 Notice

04/08/2010 Proof of Service-Mail

04/02/2010 Notice-Motion
Filed by Respondent

03/29/2010 Miscellaneous
Filed by Respondent

03/29/2010 Reply
Filed by Respondent

03/24/2010 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

03/23/2010 Proof of Service

03/19/2010 Miscellaneous

03/19/2010 Receipt
Filed by Claimant

03/19/2010 Complaint
Filed by Petitioner

03/10/2010 Proof of Service

02/18/2010 Order-Show Cause

Filed by Respondent

02/16/2010 Order-Show Cause

Filed by Respondent

02/05/2010 Order-After Hearing

02/02/2010 Order-After Hearing

01/15/2010 Reply

01/15/2010 Proof of Service

01/06/2010 Order

01/06/2010 Declaration-Income & Expense

01/06/2010 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

01/06/2010 Substitution of Attorney

12/17/2009 Answer

12/17/2009 Proof of Service-Mail

lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 3/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…
12/15/2009 Declaration-Income & Expense

12/15/2009 Application-Reissuance of OSC & Or

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 05/05/2010 12/10/2009 05/28/2009 09/09/2008

12/10/2009 Notice-Motion & Decl for Joinder

12/03/2009 Proof of Service

12/03/2009 Notice-Ruling

12/03/2009 Proof of Service-Mail

12/01/2009 Order-Show Cause

12/01/2009 Proof of Service-Mail

11/09/2009 Order-After Hearing

11/02/2009 Notice-Continuance

10/27/2009 Miscellaneous

10/23/2009 Declaration-Income & Expense

10/23/2009 Schedule of Assets & Debts

10/22/2009 Order-After Hearing

10/20/2009 Schedule of Assets & Debts

10/20/2009 Declaration-Income & Expense

09/29/2009 Objection

09/29/2009 Substitution of Attorney

09/29/2009 Reply

09/23/2009 Notice re: Payment of Support

09/17/2009 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

09/17/2009 Notice-Receipt

08/28/2009 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

08/12/2009 Order-After Hearing

Filed by Respondent

07/09/2009 Notice-Motion
Filed by Petitioner

07/07/2009 Stipulation & Order

07/06/2009 Proof of Service

07/01/2009 Notice-Motion
Filed by Respondent
lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 4/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…

06/12/2009 Declaration-Serv Pre Dec Dis Inc

06/12/2009 Declaration-Income & Expense

06/01/2009 Order

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 05/05/2010 12/10/2009 05/28/2009 09/09/2008

05/28/2009 Declaration
Filed by Petitioner

05/28/2009 Declaration-Income & Expense

Filed by Petitioner

05/28/2009 Order-Show Cause

Filed by Petitioner

04/13/2009 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

04/01/2009 Notice

03/11/2009 Notice-Continuance

03/11/2009 Proof of Service-Mail

03/10/2009 Proof of Service

02/04/2009 Motion-Reconsideration
Filed by Petitioner

02/04/2009 Declaration-Income & Expense

Filed by Petitioner

02/04/2009 Notice-Motion
Filed by Petitioner

02/02/2009 Request-Trial Setting Long Cause

Filed by Respondent

01/21/2009 Proof of Service

01/21/2009 Declaration-Serv Pre Dec Dis Inc

01/20/2009 Declaration-Serv Pre Dec Dis Inc

01/16/2009 Order-After Hearing

12/19/2008 Notice-Unavailablity-Counsel

12/08/2008 Proof of Service

12/08/2008 Substitution of Attorney

12/08/2008 Declaration-Income & Expense

12/08/2008 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

11/14/2008 Declaration

lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 5/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…
11/14/2008 Substitution of Attorney

11/12/2008 Notice-Motion
Filed by Respondent

10/15/2008 Affidavit-Prejudice-Peremptory

10/15/2008 Stipulation & Order

10/15/2008 Application-Ex-Parte-Mo-Request fo

10/10/2008 Request

10/07/2008 Declaration (by respondent )

10/07/2008 Reply

09/29/2008 Response-Decl-OSC/Ntc of Motion

09/29/2008 Declaration-Income & Expense

09/18/2008 Notice-Continuance (by petitioner )

09/15/2008 Agreement-C/C-stip ord-cust&parent

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 05/05/2010 12/10/2009 05/28/2009 09/09/2008

09/09/2008 Substitution of Attorney

09/04/2008 Request
Filed by Petitioner

09/02/2008 Substitution of Attorney

08/25/2008 Declaration-Serv Pre Dec Dis Inc

08/22/2008 Proof of Service-Mail (by respondent )

08/19/2008 Declaration-Income & Expense

08/19/2008 Notice-Motion
Filed by Respondent

08/04/2008 Notice-Ruling

07/23/2008 Substitution of Attorney

07/18/2008 Substitution of Attorney

04/21/2008 Substitution of Attorney

04/15/2008 Application-Ex-Parte-and Order

04/14/2008 Declaration-Uniform Custody Minor'

Filed by Respondent

04/14/2008 Proof of Service-Mail

Filed by Respondent

04/14/2008 Response
lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 6/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…
Filed by Respondent

01/16/2008 Summons-Family Law

Filed by Petitioner

01/16/2008 Declaration-Uniform Custody Minor'

Filed by Petitioner

01/16/2008 Petition
Filed by Petitioner

Click on any of the below link(s) to see documents filed on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 05/05/2010 12/10/2009 05/28/2009 09/09/2008

Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

Click on any of the below link(s) to see proceedings held on or before the date
indicated:
5/4/2009

11/01/2010 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion-to Consolidate - Denied

09/29/2010 at 14:00 PM in Department CE79

Motion - Held-Order made

09/22/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

Ex Parte Motion - Completed

07/14/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

Motion - Granted

05/20/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

Ex Parte -OSC - Denied

05/14/2010 at 09:30 AM in Department CE79

Ex Parte -OSC - Off calendar-No appearance

05/13/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

Ex Parte -OSC - Held-Continued

04/06/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Order to Show Cause - Held-Order made

03/10/2010 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion - Granted

01/25/2010 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion-for Joinder - Not held-Continued

01/13/2010 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion-for Joinder (cont to 1/25/10 mptgn) - Continued

01/06/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Modification - Held-Order made

12/15/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 7/8
11/6/2010 Los Angeles Superior Court - Civil Case…
Ex Parte Motion - Held-Order made

12/01/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Modification - Held-Continued

10/28/2009 at 10:30 AM in Department CE79

Motion - Granted

10/06/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Modification - Held-Continued

09/02/2009 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion - Held-Continued

08/12/2009 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion-for Joinder - Granted

08/06/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

Conference-Trial Setting - Off calendar

07/01/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Modification - Not held-Continued

Click on any of the below link(s) to see proceedings held on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 5/4/2009

05/04/2009 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion-for Reconsideration - Denied

05/01/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

Conference-Trial Setting - Held-Continued

03/25/2009 at 08:45 AM in Department CE79

Motion-for Reconsideration (cont to 4/22/09 ptgn; osc for modto follow Note: 4-22-
09 continuance set in error by relief clerk. Court is dark 4-22 through 24, 2009) -
Not held-Continued

12/08/2008 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Costs,Supp,Attn Fees - Held-Order made

10/15/2008 at 08:45 AM in Department CE65

Motion-for Attorney Fees - Transfer-Other department

10/15/2008 at 08:30 AM in Department CE79

OSC-Costs,Supp,Attn Fees - Not held-Continued

10/15/2008 at 08:30 AM in Department CE2, Sandoz, John H, Presiding

Hearing-Transfer to Another Court - Reassigned-Case for all purposes

05/07/2008 at 08:30 AM in Department CE65

Ex Parte -OSC - Off calendar-No appearance

Click on any of the below link(s) to see proceedings held on or before the date
indicated:
TOP 5/4/2009

Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed | Proceeding Information

lasuperiorcourt.org/…/casesummary.as… 8/8